Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 6380 05/21/2018 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 6380 (GENERAL) AN ORDINANCE INCORPORATING SPRINGFIELD ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES MANUAL APPENDIX 1A INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 3.4-200, GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT MIXED-USE PLAN DISTRICT, TO IMPLEMENT GLENWOOD REFINEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES; ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FINDS THAT: WHEREAS, the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan (GRP) was adopted by Springfield on June 18, 2012 (Ordinance No. 6279) and Lane County on September 5, 2012 (Ordinance No. PA1288 and No. 3-12); and WHEREAS, Springfield amended the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) on December 3, 2012 (Resolution No. 2012-23) to incorporate Appendix 1A, Glenwood Riverfront Street Cross-Section Standards, in order to implement Phase I GRP street design policies and implementation strategies; and WHEREAS, the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan and the Springfield Development Code were amended by Springfield on April 7, 2014 (Ordinance No. 6316) and Lane County on April 14, 2014 (Ordinance No. PA1306 and No. 13-7) and acknowledged by the Department of Land Conservation and Development on May 9, 2014; and WHEREAS, staff initiated the proposed amendments for consideration of the Springfield Planning Commission and the City Council; and WHEREAS, the proposed text amendments to Springfield Development Code Section 3.4-200 would locate the Glenwood Riverfront street design standards currently comprising Appendix 1A of the EDSPM in the Development Code with other applicable Glenwood Riverfront land use regulations; and WHEREAS, Section 5.6-100 of the Springfield Development Code sets forth procedures for the amendment of the Development Code; and WHEREAS, notice was sent to the Department of Land Conservation and Development on February 13, 2018, not less than 35 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing in compliance with OAR 660-018-0020; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2018, the Springfield Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the text amendments. The public hearing was conducted in accordance with Springfield Development Code Sections 5.2-120 through 5.2-145; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2018, after review of the staff report, evidence in the record, written comments, and testimony of those who spoke at the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the text amendments based on the findings of fact set forth in the Commission's Order and Recommendation; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2018, the Springfield City Council conducted a first reading and held a duly noticed public hearing on the recommended text amendments; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2018, the City Council conducted a second reading of the ordinance, reviewed the evidence and testimony already in the record as well as the evidence and testimony presented at the Council's public hearing and is ready to approve the text amendments in Exhibit B based on the findings of fact in Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Staff Report and Findings attached as Exhibit A are incorporated herein by reference and adopted. Section 2. The Springfield Development Code is amended as shown in Exhibit B. Section 3. Severability Clause. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion hereof. Section 4. Effective Date of Ordinance. Notwithstanding the effective date of ordinances as provided by Section 2.110 of the Springfield Municipal Code 1997, this ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of passage by the City Council and approval by the Mayor or upon the date of acknowledgement as provided in ORS 197.625, whichever date is later. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 21 day of MAY , 2018 by a vote of 6 for and 0 against. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 21 day of MAY 2018 Lsa� Mayor REVIEWED : PPROVED City Recorder ASo FT' DATE: . MAW OFFICE OF Y AT +RNEY ORDINANCE NO. 6380 SPRINGFIELD ltigimili IV* OREGON Type IV Amendment to the Springfield Development Code Exhibit A - Staff Report & Findings Project Name: EDSPM Land Use Regulation Amendment Nature of Application: Move text and images from Appendix 1A of EDSPM to Development Code by Council Ordinance. Case Number: 811-17-000137-TYP4 Project Location: Glenwood Refinement Plan Phase I legislative action Date of Initiation: October 20, 2017 Date of DLCD Notice of Proposed Amendment: February 13, 2018 Date of Newspaper Notice: February 28, 2018, April 27, 2018 Date of Mailed Notice: February 28, 2018 Date of Hearings: March 20, 2018 (Planning Commission), May 7, 2018 (City Council) Executive Summary In 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) diagram, Glenwood Refinement Plan (GRP) text and diagram, Springfield Development Code, and Springfield Zoning Map for the Glenwood Riverfront. The Glenwood amendment package was ultimately acknowledged by the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) in 2014. To implement the GRP policies, the Council approved amendments to the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM), including specific design standards for the Glenwood Riverfront internal street network (Resolution 2012-23). These Glenwood-specific street standards comprise Appendix 1A of the EDSPM. In adopting the ordinance and resolution, Council is relocating the Glenwood Riverfront Street Cross- Section Standards from the EDSPM into the Springfield Development Code so that future changes to provisions in the EDSPM can be made by Council Resolution instead of through the amendment process required for land use regulations under ORS 197.610 et seq. Thus, the text and images in Appendix 1A of the EDSPM are relocated to Springfield Development Code (SDC) Section 3.4-200, Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District. SDC Section 5.6-115 includes the following criteria to be used in approving an amendment to the SDC: "In reaching a decision on the adoption or amendment of refinement plans and this Code's text, the City Council shall adopt findings that demonstrate conformance to the following: The Metro Plan; applicable Page 1 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 State statutes; and, applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules. Based on findings found later in this report in response to these criteria, the amendments to SDC Section 3.4-200 are consistent with these criteria. Nature of Request The Springfield Development Code (SDC) is the acknowledged land use implementation ordinance for Springfield. The SDC and its development review provisions are periodically reviewed, updated, or revised to meet changing circumstances and conditions. City staff initiated this request pursuant to the City Attorney Office's recommendation to adopt Appendix 1A of the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) into the Springfield Development Code by ordinance in accordance with the Post-Acknowledgement Plan Amendment procedures outlined in Oregon Revised Statutes 197.610- 197.620. In accordance with SDC 5.6-110, amendments of the Development Code are reviewed under Type IV procedure as a legislative action. Type IV procedures as defined in SDC Section 5.1-140 require: 1) review and a recommendation by the Springfield Planning Commission; and 2) adoption of ordinance by the Springfield City Council. Springfield City Council approves the subject amendments to SDC Section 3.4-200, Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District, to relocate the text and images from Appendix 1A of the EDSPM to the Springfield Development Code so that they may be acknowledged as a land use regulation. Overview of Text Amendment The Springfield Development Code (SDC) provides the following role for Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District (Section 3.4-200): "The Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District takes policies from the Glenwood Refinement Plan and establishes and implements development standards and building design standards specifically applicable to this Plan District." Thus, Section 3.4-200 is the appropriate location for the Glenwood Riverfront street design standards. The subject amendment modifies SDC Section 3.4-200 (specifically Subsections 3.4-230 and 3.4-270), as depicted in Exhibit B, to incorporate the street design standards text and images previously located in Appendix 1A of the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual into the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District. Notification and Written Comments In accordance with the Oregon Administrative Rules 660-018-0020, prior to adopting a change to an acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation, local governments are required to notify the state Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) at least 35 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing. A Notice of Proposed Amendment was submitted electronically to the DLCD on February 13, 2018, which is more than 35 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing on the matter. In accordance with Springfield Development Code Section 5.2-115.B, Type IV legislative land use decisions require notice in a newspaper of general circulation. Notification of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the legal notices section of The Register Guard on February 28, 2018. Notice of the City Council public hearing on the proposal was published in the legal notices section of The Register Guard on April 27, 2018. Page 2 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 r In accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 227.186, Ballot Measure 56 notice was mailed to all landowners within the Glenwood Riverfront (Phase I) boundary on February 28, 2018, which is more than 20 days but less than 40 days before the first public hearing. Brief History of Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan • On February 25, 2008, the Springfield City Council directed staff to proceed with updating the Glenwood Refinement Plan in phases. • For the Phase I (Glenwood Riverfront) update, City staff, along with partner agencies and a 20- member Citizen Advisory Committee, developed a package of amendments to the Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) diagram, Glenwood Refinement Plan diagram and text, Springfield Development Code, and Springfield Zoning Map. • On June 18, 2012, the Phase 1 Update was adopted by the Springfield City Council, Ordinance 6279. • On September 5, 2012, the Phase 1 Update was co-adopted by the Lane County Board of Commissioners, Ordinances PA 1288 and No. 3-12. • On September 28, 2012, Shamrock Homes, LLC filed a Notice of Intent to Appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). • On July 12, 2013, LUBA rendered its decision. LUBA required Springfield and Lane County to take additional action with regards to Goal 9 (Economic Development); Goal 10 (Housing); Goal 12 (Transportation); and Goal 15 (Willamette River Greenway). • On April 7, 2014, the response to the LUBA Remand by Springfield was adopted by the Springfield City Council, Ordinance 6316. • On April 14, 2014, the response to the LUBA Remand by Lane County was adopted by the Lane County Board of Commissioners, Ordinances PA 1306 and No. 13-07. • On May 9, 2014, the Phase 1 Update, including all adopted Ordinances, was acknowledged by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. Criteria of Approval Springfield Development Code (SDC) Section 5.6-115A. describes the criteria to be used in approving an amendment to the SDC. It states that in reaching a decision, the Planning Commission and the City Council must adopt findings that demonstrate conformance with 1) the Metro Plan, 2) applicable State statutes, and 3) applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules. Findings of Fact Conformance with the Metro Plan The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) is Springfield's prevailing comprehensive plan. The Springfield 2030 Residential Land Use and Housing Element was adopted in 2011 through Springfield Ordinance 6268 and Lane County Ordinance No. PA. 1274 as a refinement to the Metro Plan. Amendments to the Development Code must be considered within the context of Springfield's adopted policies. Thus, any amendments must be consistent with the Metro Plan and the Springfield 2030 Residential Land Use and Housing Element. The Springfield 2035 Transportation System Plan adopted in 2014 by Springfield Ordinance 6314 and Lane County Ordinance No. PA 1303 is a Page 3 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 functional plan of the Metro Plan. Applicable policies and findings of fact showing compliance with those policies are presented below. Finding: The street design standards that are the subject of the Development Code amendment implement the adopted and acknowledged policies of the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan (GRP) Transportation Chapter, which were found to be in conformance with the Metro Plan and Springfield 2030 Residential Land Use and Housing Element through the Phase I GRP adoption process. The following Metro Plan policies from the Environmental Design Element are implemented by the subject amendments to the Development Code and therefore provide substantive confirmation that the proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan. E.4. Public and private facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that preserves and enhances desirable features of local and neighborhood areas and promotes their sense of identity. Finding: The street design standards support the design and construction of a local street network in the Glenwood Riverfront that meets Springfield's adopted vision and policies for riverfront redevelopment. E.6. Local jurisdictions shall carefully evaluate their development regulations to ensure that they address environmental design considerations, such as, but not limited to, safety, crime prevention, aesthetics, and compatibility with existing and anticipated adjacent uses. Finding: In developing specific street type design standards for the Glenwood Riverfront, the City considered the future land use context and environmental design considerations, as outlined in the Phase I GRP. E.B. Site planning standards developed by local jurisdictions shall allow for flexibility in design that will achieve site planning objectives while allowing for creative solutions to design problems. Finding: The Development Code amendments include street design standards that provide design options for meeting the Phase I GRP transportation policies in the design and construction of the Glenwood Riverfront local street network. The following Springfield 2035 Transportation System Plan policies under the System Design goal are implemented by the subject amendments to the Development Code and therefore provide substantive confirmation that the proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan (refinements of and functional plans to the Metro Plan are elements of the Metro Plan therefore implementing ordinances must achieve the same consistency with these documents as provided to the Metro Plan.). 3.2 Expand and enhance Springfield's bikeway system and provide bicycle system support facilities for both new development and redevelopment/expansion. Finding: The street design standards included in the Development Code amendment require the provision of bike lanes on collector streets and the installation of shared-roadway facilities, on-street pavement markings, and traffic calming measures along local streets with slow vehicle traffic. Page 4 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 3.3 Street design standards should be flexible and allow appropriate-sized local, collector, and arterial streets based upon traffic flow, geography, efficient land use, social, economic, and environmental impacts. Finding: The Development Code amendment includes street design standards that provide design options. In conformance with the Phase I GRP transportation policies,the street designs are intended to reduce vehicular speeds while encouraging safe bicycle and pedestrian travel, allow for provision of mid- block pedestrian crossings, incorporate traffic calming measures, and integrate pedestrian amenities and environmentally sensitive street design. 3.4 Provide for a continuous transportation network with reasonably direct travel routes to destination points for all modes of travel. Finding: The street design standards included in the Development Code amendment support the implementation of a connected grid network in the Glenwood Riverfront and require provision of wide, setback sidewalks on all streets. 3.5 Address the mobility and safety needs of motorists, transit users, bicyclists, pedestrians,freight, and the needs of emergency vehicles when planning and constructing system improvements. Finding: The development of the street design standards that are the subject of the Development Code amendment was coordinated with traffic engineers, fire and life safety personnel, and public works operations staff. Conclusion: The code amendment complies with applicable policies from the Metro Plan, including the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan Residential Land Use and Housing Element and the Springfield 2035 Transportation System Plan, and therefore meets Criterion A.1. Conformance with Applicable State Statutes Finding: Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 197.175(2) states that ... "each city and county in this state shall: (a) Prepare, adopt, amend and revise comprehensive plans in compliance with goals approved by the commission; (b) Enact land use regulations to implement their comprehensive plans;..." Finding: The amendment to SDC 3.4-200 implements the Phase I GRP Transportation Chapter policies and implementation strategies as required by ORS 197.175(2)(b). Finding: ORS 227.186 requires local governments to mail individual notices ('Ballot Measure 56 Notice') to real property owners of pending land use changes that could limit or prohibit previously allowed uses. Finding: As noted on p.2, Ballot Measure 56 Notice was mailed to all landowners within the GRP Phase I boundary on February 28, 2018 in compliance with ORS 227.186. Finding: ORS 197.250 requires local government land use regulations to comply with Statewide Planning Goals. Finding: This application can be deemed in compliance by adoption of findings relating how the application conforms to each of the Statewide Planning Goals, as outlined in the following section. Page 5 of 11 ORDINANCE NO.6380 Finding: ORS 197.610 requires local jurisdictions to submit proposed comprehensive plan or land use regulation changes to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). Finding: As noted on p.2, notice of the proposed amendment was provided to DLCD more than 35 days in advance of the first evidentiary hearing concerning the amendments. Conclusion: The preceding findings demonstrate this code amendment complies with applicable statues,therefore Criterion A.2. is met. Conformance with Applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules Finding: Goal 1—Citizen Involvement—calls for"the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process". The public has been given extensive opportunities to be involved in the street design standards that comprise the subject Development Code amendment, including the development and adoption of the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan (GRP), the adoption of the standards into the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM), and, more recently, through the public process to incorporate these same standards into the Springfield Development Code (SDC). Finding: The adopted and acknowledged Phase 1 GRP incorporated an extensive citizen involvement process over the course of the 61/2-year work task, including the formation of a Citizen Advisory Committee, mailed (Ballot Measure 56) and newspaper notice, and numerous public hearings at the Planning Commission, Springfield City Council, and Lane County Board of Commissioners. Finding: The development and adoption of the 2012 EDSPM amendments to incorporate the subject street standards into Appendix 1A, provided opportunities for citizen engagement. Specifically, the updates were posted on the City's website and three emails were sent to nearly 50 members of the engineering and development community asking for input. A duly noticed Council public hearing was also held on the EDSPM amendments. Finding: Springfield's Committee for Citizen Involvement reviewed and approved a Citizen Engagement Plan for the subject land use action on March 6, 2018. This plan builds upon prior citizen involvement opportunities for Glenwood planning efforts and encourages and maintains open channels of communication between the City and affected parties. Finding: The Development Code amendment is the subject of a legislative decision-making process with public hearings before the City's Planning Commission and Council. Finding: The Planning Commission public hearing was advertised in the legal notices section of the Register-Guard on February 28, 2018, and notification of the City Council public hearing was published in the Register-Guard newspaper on April 27, 2018. Finding: Public hearing notice and responses to Frequently Asked Questions were mailed to all residents and property owners in the Glenwood Riverfront on February 28, 2018. Planning staff was available to answer additional questions at a general Glenwood Open House sponsored by the City at Roaring Rapids Pizza Company in Glenwood on March 13, 2018. Page 6 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 Finding: Information concerning the subject amendment and the dates of the public hearings were posted on the City of Springfield website. This website routinely includes information about upcoming and continuing planning matters. Finding: Agenda notice and/or agenda packets are routinely provided (primarily by e-mail) to interested parties who have asked for such notification. Those notified include local media outlets and newspapers, local utilities, school districts and partner agencies, local state representatives, the Eugene and Springfield Chambers of Commerce, the Lane Homebuilders Association, as well as various neighborhood groups and leaders. Finding: City staff received four emails and three phone calls in response to the hearing notice. In addition to clarification regarding the proposal, comments were submitted that were forwarded to the Planning Commission as part of the record. Finding: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject amendment on March 20, 2018; two individuals submitted written testimony, and four people presented oral testimony. The Planning Commission determined that the testimony did not directly relate to the Development Code amendment and referred those present to applicable City staff and partner agencies. Finding: The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 7, 2018. A summary of the written and oral testimony submitted to the Planning Commission and City staff response was presented to the Council at their May 7, 2018 public hearing. No additional written or oral testimony was presented at the Council public hearing. Finding: Goal 2 — Land Use Planning — outlines the basic procedures for Oregon's statewide planning program. In accordance with Goal 2, land use decisions are to be made in conformance with a comprehensive plan, and jurisdictions are to adopt suitable implementation ordinances that put the plan's policies into force and effect. Finding: The Springfield Development Code is a key mechanism used to implement the goals and policies of the City's adopted comprehensive plans, particularly the Metro Plan. The purpose of this amendment is to move the street design standards, adopted into the EDSPM in 2012 to implement the Phase I GRP Transportation Chapter polices, to the Development Code. As demonstrated for Criterion A.1. above, the amendment is consistent with the Metro Plan and does not affect City ordinances, policies, plans, and studies adopted to comply with Goal 2 requirements. Finding: Goal 3 — Agricultural Land — applies to areas subject to farm zoning that are outside acknowledged urban growth boundaries (UGBs). The City has an acknowledged UGB and therefore consistent with the express language of the Goal, does not have farm land zoning within its jurisdictional boundary. Consequently, and as expressed in the text of the Goal, Goal 3 is not applicable. Finding: Goal 4 — Forest Land — applies to timber lands zoned for that use that are outside acknowledged UGBs with the intent to conserve forest lands for forest uses. The City has an acknowledged UGB and does not have forest zoning within its incorporated area. Consequently, and as expressed in the text of the Goal, Goal 4 is not applicable. Page 7 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 Finding : Goal 5—Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources—applies to more than a dozen natural and cultural resources such as wildlife habitats and wetlands, and establishes a process for each resource to be inventoried, evaluated and protected as applicable. Finding: At the March 20, 2018 Planning Commission public hearing, two individuals raised concerns relating to Goal 5. Specifically, concerns were raised regarding a public utility entity complying with environmental protection regulations in developing an electric substation in Glenwood and consideration of the natural environment in developing the GRP and Glenwood Riverfront Street Cross- Section standards. Finding: The public utility property referenced in the aforementioned oral testimony for a future electric substation is owned by the Springfield Utility Board and is annexed. The property contains an approximately .86-acre wetland that has been delineated, and the City's wetland inventory has determined is not locally significant. The need for a future substation in Glenwood is identified in the Phase I GRP and the regional Public Facilities and Services Plan. Development of the substation requires Site Plan Review and thus will be required to conform to the City's tree felling and natural resource protection standards. The Development Code amendments do not alter the City's acknowledged land use regulations regarding public utility facilities or the development of wetlands. The amendments also do not impact the Development Code's acknowledged compliance with Goal 11 requirements regarding Public Facilities and Services as discussed further below. Finding: Public testimony provided to the Planning Commission also expressed general concerns with the proposed amendments' impact on environmental quality in Glenwood, including concerns related to the Willamette Greenway setback line. One of the overarching GRP goals is to: Restore, enhance, and protect the ecological function of natural resources, and increase public awareness of these resources. The restoration and protection of Glenwood's natural resources were of paramount consideration in the development of the GRP and implementing regulations, as documented in the Statewide Planning Goal findings associated with their development. The subject amendments do not alter the acknowledged Plan District standards for the Willamette Greenway Overlay District in SDC 3.4-280. Finding: The amendment would not alter any existing code provisions for the protection of natural resources.Therefore,this action does not alter the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 5. Finding: Goal 6—Air, Water and Land Resources Quality—applies to local comprehensive plans and the implementation of measures consistent with state and Federal regulations on matters such as clean air, clean water, and preventing groundwater pollution. The amendment to SDC Section 3.4-200 does not repeal, replace or void existing Metro Plan policy or Development Code regulations with respect to any identified air, water or land resource issues. Therefore, this action does not alter the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 6. Finding: Goal 7 — Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards — applies to development in areas subject to natural hazards such as floodplains and potential landslide areas. The City has inventoried areas subject to natural hazards, and the amendment to SDC 3.4-200 does not remove or exempt compliance with Code standards that apply to development within these hazard areas. Therefore, this action has no effect on the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 7. Finding: Goal 8 — Recreational Needs — requires communities to evaluate their recreation areas and facilities and to develop plans to address current and projected demand. The provision of recreation Page 8 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 services within Springfield is the responsibility of Willamalane Park & Recreation District. Willamalane has an adopted 20-Year Comprehensive Plan for the provision of park, open space and recreation services for Springfield which the City has co-adopted. The amendment to SDC 3.4-200 does not alter or conflict with the policies or provisions in the Park and Recreations Comprehensive Plan or with Willamalane's responsibility to plan for or provide recreational programs or facilities. Therefore, this action has no effect on the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 8. Finding: Goal 9— Economic Development—addresses diversification and improvement of the economy. The amendment to SDC 3.4-200 does not have an impact on the City's supply of industrial or commercial lands, and the amendment does not affect City policies, plans, and studies for economic development. Therefore, this action is consistent with the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 9. Finding: Goal 10—Housing—applies to the planning for and provision of needed housing types. Finding: At the March 20, 2018 Planning Commission public hearing oral and written testimony was submitted regarding concern over the uncertain future of manufactured home parks in Glenwood, that the proposed street standards and other future actions to implement the GRP would cause gentrification, result in the loss of affordable housing, and not comply Statewide Planning Goal 10 (Housing). Finding: The future of manufactured home parks in Glenwood and the GRP's conformance with Goal 10 was explored in depth at the time the Phase I GRP was developed and adopted, through the subsequent land use appeal, remand by the Land Use Board of Appeals, and ultimate acknowledgement by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. The adopted GRP manufactured home park policies are: ■ D.2.a. Allow existing residential uses in manufactured home parks to continue under the pre-existing non-conforming use provisions of the Springfield Development Code. ■ D.2.b. Rely on State laws and regulations, while responding with applicable referrals to applicable services, to address the needs of individual manufactured home park tenants. ■ D.2.c. Consider providing financial assistance for mandated expenses of relocation or displacement of residents from potentially closed manufactured home parks through Springfield Economic Development Agency's tax increment-funded programs, as funding becomes available. • D.2.d. Explore the feasibility of partnering with a non-profit or for-profit entity to acquire land and develop a new manufactured home park in Springfield or other affordable housing opportunities for relocating potentially displaced manufactured home park tenants. Finding: The Glenwood Riverfront street standards have no impact on, and are consistent with,the above-listed GRP policies regarding manufactured home parks in the Plan District. Finding: Goal 10 requires the City to maintain an adequate supply of buildable land to meet the need for housing at all income levels. The Glenwood Riverfront street standards do not alter the City's acknowledged supply of residential buildable lands. Page 9 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 Finding: The amendment does not alter City ordinances, policies, plans, and studies adopted to comply with Goal 10 requirements. Therefore, this action is consistent with the city's acknowledged compliance with Goal 10. Finding: Goal 11 — Public Facilities and Services — addresses the efficient planning and provision of public services at the appropriate type and level to support planned development. The amendment does not reduce any requirements for the extension or provision of public facilities or services during development review procedures and will have no effect on adopted and acknowledged public facilities plans. Therefore,this action has no effect on the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 11. Finding: Goal 12 — Transportation — applies to the provision of a "safe, convenient and economic transportation system". The Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) requires that amendments to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation consider potential impacts to existing or planned transportation facilities "unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule." Finding: OAR 660-012-0060 (10) states that a local government may amend a land use regulation without applying performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic congestion, delay, or travel time if the amendment affects only land entirely within a multi-modal mixed-use area (MMA) and is consistent with the definition and function of the MMA. Finding: A key objective of the Phase I GRP is to create a highly pedestrian-oriented environment to support future mixed-use development and increase the ease and convenience of walking. Associated policies and implementation strategies to foster this pedestrian-friendly environment are through decreasing automobile speeds in neighborhoods, focusing most through-traffic on arterials, aligning streets to reduce the distance that pedestrians have to walk to a crosswalk to safely cross a street, allowing sight lines and connections to destinations that attract pedestrian activity, and minimizing the real and perceived distances between development, parks, and greenway amenities. Policies also include features such as wide setback sidewalks with minimal interruptions in the flow or grade of pedestrian travel, interesting street furniture and public art, pedestrian-scale lighting, street trees, and other green street elements that also make the pedestrian experience safe, comfortable, and attractive. Finding: In addressing the LUBA Remand of the Phase I GRP, the City established the MMA designation for the Glenwood Riverfront (Springfield Ordinance 6316), which was acknowledged by DLCD on May 9, 2014. The subject Development Code amendment applies to the streets in the Glenwood Riverfront and thus falls entirely within the MMA boundary. Further, the subject street standards are intended to support the development of an interconnected multi-modal grid network that supports high-density mixed-use development. This street grid will enhance multi-modal circulation, disperse traffic, and facilitate walking and biking with wide, setback sidewalks, bike facilities, pedestrian-oriented street crossings, street trees, pedestrian scale lighting, on street parking. Therefore, the amendment is consistent with the definition and function of the MMA. Finding: The level of development currently permitted through existing zoning regulations will remain the same as a result of this amendment. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 12. Finding: Goal 13 — Energy Conservation — states that "land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy, based upon sound Page 10 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 economic principles". The text amendment does not affect the City's ordinances, policies, plans, or studies adopted to comply with Goal 13 requirements. Therefore, this action has no effect on the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 13. Finding: Goal 14 — Urbanization — requires cities to estimate future growth rates and patterns and to incorporate, plan, and zone enough land to meet the projected demands. The amendment to SDC Section 3.4-200 does not repeal, replace, or void existing Metro Plan policy or change land use designations or Development Code regulations with respect to Springfield's growth management or annexation. Therefore, this action has no effect on the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 14. Finding: Goal 15 —Willamette River Greenway—establishes procedures for administering the 300 miles of greenway that borders the Willamette River. The text amendment does not change or nullify the requirement for development proposals to comply with the City's existing Willamette River Greenway regulations. Therefore, this action has no effect on the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 15. Finding: Goals 16-19 — Estuarine Resources; Coastal Shorelands; Beaches and Dunes; and Ocean Resources — these goals do not apply to land within the Willamette Valley, including Springfield. Therefore, Goals 16-19 do not apply in Springfield or to land use regulations adopted in Springfield. Conclusion: The code amendment complies with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and therefore meets Criterion A.3. Conclusion and Recommendation Based on the findings above and the criteria of SDC 5.6-115 for approving amendments to the Springfield Development Code, the subject text amendment to Section 3.4-200 is consistent with these criteria, and based on these findings, the City Council may approve the amendment. Page 11 of 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 Exhibit B Amendment to Springfield Development Code The amendments are shown in legislative format (deleted text with strike-thru red font and new text with underline red font). Commentary is shown in purple italics font. Chapter 3 Land Use Districts 3.4-200 Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Commentary: Remove references to the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual(EDSPM) and replace with Development Code references. 3.4-230 Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Modifications J Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District modifications shall be categorized as Minor and Major. A. A Minor Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District modification shall be subject to a Director's decision under either a Type I or a Type II review procedure. Minor Modifications are those that result in any of the following: 1. Type I Review Procedure. a. Changes related to the streetscape, the visual elements of a street, including, but not limited to: the street surface; adjacent buildings; street furniture; and trees and open spaces that combine to form the street's character in a manner consistent with the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter policies and implementation strategies and the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. b. A change in the design of a street in a manner consistent with the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter policies and implementation strategies and the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual Subsection 3.4-270A.3. ...[no intervening amendments]... E. Major and Minor Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Plan modification criteria. The proposed modification shall: 1. Maintain the integrity of the north/south east-west street grid that provides multi- modal internal circulation in the Franklin Riverfront and the future internal street layout in the McVay Riverfront established by the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter policies and implementation strategies, or the proposed modification shall be necessary to adjust to physical constraints evident on the property including, but not limited to: Page 1 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 a. Hillsides; b. Protecting significant natural features such as trees, rock outcroppings, wetlands, or similar natural features; or c. Adjusting existing property lines between proposed development area boundaries. 2. Not significantly affect the landscaping, stormwater management, design, circulation and access policies and implementation strategies in the applicable chapters of the Glenwood Refinement Plan, Subsection 3.4-270A.3, or the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Commentary: Remove references to the EDSPM and replace with Development Code references and insert text from EDSPM Appendix 1A into Development Code. 3.4-270 Public and Private Development Standards A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks. 1. Public Streets, alleys and sidewalks in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Chapter and designed and constructed as specified in Subsection 3.4-270A.3 and the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. The following is an overview of the Glenwood Riverfront street network: a. Franklin Riverfront Arterial Street. Franklin Boulevard shall be designed and constructed as a hybrid multi-way boulevard. b. Franklin Riverfront Local Street Network. A grid street pattern shall be designed and constructed to include north-south through streets, park block streets, a riverfront street, east-west service streets and alleys as specified in Subsection 3.4-270A.2.d. c. Franklin Riverfront Block Length. Block length and width shall range from 250 to 350 feet. EXCEPTION: Park block width (east-west) shall be a minimum of 150 feet. However, the City and Willamalane will seek to minimize park block width prior to the submittal of development applications as specified in Subsection 3.4- 270J.4.b. d. Franklin Riverfront Mid-block Connectors/Alleys. Mid-block connectors or alleys shall be designed and constructed either mid-way or every 250 to 350 feet in Page 2 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 those larger blocks that exceed the block length standard specified in Subsection 3.4-270A.2.c. In addition, alleys shall be limited to the grid street pattern area described in Subsection 3.4-270A.2.b., and shall be used as specified in Subsection 3.4-270G.11. e. In the Franklin Riverfront, the developer shall coordinate with the City to allow temporary access to properties prior to the establishment of the required grid street system. Temporary access will be reviewed and approved during the Site Plan Review process. As the grid system is established, the developer shall be required to remove the temporary access at their own expense, while establishing the required grid street system as specified in the Glenwood Refinement Plan and Subsection 3.4-270A.3the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. f. McVay Riverfront Arterial Street. McVay Highway shall be designed and constructed as a multi-modal facility. In consideration of significant infrastructure improvements required along the frontage of McVay Highway and the uncertainty as to the timing of these improvements, an Improvement Agreement may be accepted in lieu of completing frontage improvements at the time of development approval. In the case of property requiring annexation to the City, the terms of making the improvements shall be described in the Annexation Agreement. g. McVay Riverfront Local Street Network. Primary access from McVay Highway shall be from east-west streets in the vicinity of East 19th Avenue, Nugget Way and the south end of Glenwood. ii. A grid street pattern may be accomplished by incorporating north-south streets as specified in Subsection 3.4-270A.2.b. or by shared private driveways. 3. Construction and design of Ppublic streets, alleys, and sidewalks shall be designed and constructed as specified in the following street cross-section standards and in the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual_: a. Riverfront Street Page 3 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 VII I j . I ...., .rte - a � 11 eye i. Riverfront Street with Parallel Parking it. tits - - ' , . t $ .. .. — it. i, \ _ Y. 1 , 44444 ' tt -mar._ Image Source`.City o pnn iel' (a) The street shall be two way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk on each side of Ithe street. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone (elements in an amenity zone are street trees, plants, parking meters, street lights, street furniture, art, etc.) between the curb and sidewalk on the south side of the street. (d) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the travel way and sidewalk on the north side of the street. (e) There shall be decorative street lighting. (f) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (g) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (h) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. Page 4 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 (i) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2'out from the parking striping. (i) Parallel parking stall widths shall be 7' wide. (k) Parking shall be installed on the south side of the street. (I) Parking shall not be installed on the north side of the street. (m) Travel lanes shall be 10' wide. Page 5 of 26 ORDINANCE NO.6380 Zi W )51X 1 H y y r U ,i� W r.. spark : (n • . " r iylr4...at ' .! A .211- i'' 'A tirri i---1 T r 9' 10' 10' r 7 ala �1 .� ` `� 417 Y ' W ._ o Z 0 it - es t Si i1 Q 4.... •,_1 T, Figure 3.4-Al Page 6 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 Riverfront Street with Angled Parking fir ;c: Photo Source:Corvallis Riverfront,Google Maps (a) The street shall be two way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk on both sides of the street. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone (elements in an amenity zone are street trees, plants, parking meters, street lights, street furniture, art, etc.) between the curb and sidewalk on the south side of the street. (d) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the travel way and sidewalk on the north side of the street. (e) There shall be decorative street lighting. (1) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (g) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (h) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (i) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' out from the angled parking striping. (I) The angled parking dimensions from the Springfield Development Code shall be used. (k) Parking shall be installed on the south side of the street. (I) Parking shall not be installed on the north side of the street. (m) Travel lanes shall be 10' wide. Page 7 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 C...) Wr I—+ 0 "''i z 0 — -'4-, . `lk-1,i k « �W n 17— td AL . r ® c T r 10' 10' T T Cure) . '::1";* ',.,', 111 1: , - ' .' NA '''' V it+, 0. - _ _ ir ,W - H .; '0 • f (f t z H ALA. :� t' —':L.'414 V W — tt.41 h i. g+- : dam' ili 4 4111 > • i 6g i Jf 6�U/ 1 F• Figure 3.4-A2 Page 8 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 iii. Riverfront Street with Reversed Angled Parking - Atom • • !r x Photo Source:David Dewitte,The Gazette (a) The street shall be two way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk on both sides of the street. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the curb and sidewalk on the south side of the street. (d) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the travel way and sidewalk on the north side of the street. (e) There shall be decorative street lighting. (f) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (g) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (h) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (i) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' out from the reverse angled parking striping. (I) The reverse angled parking dimensions from the Springfield Development Code shall be used. (k) Parking shall be installed on the south side of the street. (I) Parking shall not be installed on the north side of the street. (m) Travel lanes shall be 10' wide. Page 9 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 - . I] c.1.1 1-4 0 co) X P' 11 4. •--i 70 • .... *. 30 1i4C• - U ... • 4.1444:": - ''.. •44.0",0 ^".. `,.. )'.4.1r.r.,10 ' -4liti.--•- W ''''r•1111.7j.- _ . . -, )...-,/ e. cr) 4•J ::. • . .... ...- .. - f .:,:'., .• " ' ' . . ,. ..,.,..*-* t• •• - . . i r I -. , ii.,..4.ii. Cro) 'al IV(7 , .3 qP A , Z V dqp . . : T 7' 10' 10 T T 44.41 4J -.1 •;- ,-' ',anus_ 4,4,4110.. •• law .;„, • Ai,,,, 1 J I t4 * ›. I ig...! -?.. INIi. it,. '1!1? =••••. ;Oak NI,. -r.".:' mar ••-e_..- A. ; i3V ' A ‹i- Ulla, A, v cit ' 'WIM I BISEP•41b. .. WM,'7u", .... • leavao...,•_-.1wriaah. ' 12 . wmnaummmwcmnnnmM"MML437WVSiUs..AANWtfappdg.. ,. .- . - ., - . atin.._alxv-,61altaatialarVesoitiailaat.aas:-viar ltingit..*.4,,--. .-- 1.,-,, - Ii!Aciimit I r- ....smilioni ommiteas m sour - - 1 ii, ISMINCENNIGP101161117" 'IN, .Mg:.•;',..t.,,-,... ..-- .,... •.. W vassaiemenaiaar • -azOlajaajima: :--...-• ... 4 .... . .„.„.0.........., . . , ... . , Vt.. -.,WU, :111M1121111III131116 . ''• '•-• .. Is.,•'• -.41.011t-: . 4.-] -- lair- milEPPECEOMNISKSI. ....• --.:: .... --.. ,• W . - MI WINAIMMIN236,. .." •-:• .;..(-.._ , ',;.•',' * H 1I E, 4 di Cn a ak...*:.a, ::,:-:•-• 2, - )-1 . • -1112:100111,1141=1:1111010, A. NINICIESE2finlii561, .. . ..... ..... _, P-4 Ell 41. 'W 4`=„19161RISZINIONEERIA .''.• ' Ai. ‘II591101regiiiliklilintl •• v14111. vAmgkilklitlitiZZIVIIMISititel Azirmoggigite, .... - A..... ..-•:ti.... ..naultataitnallawksia -imp•• -• '• •ii..i......:irnacalimatakiirlaia6seautectwairm I. .•1 - .ttAkA •.••: '',..,,,•'• MIErleglegtaCMagiNROMMOIMIENONMMLNiq L ARROAk41112113:-''''''.!1d111. (:) ciaaaalstafg;eSaigaloranattmdiftlaiavvr-• - I- ---.'."' '''' . . __. _Tanna,-.4:r , OIENEERM9 fear" Wilk & '.",. It • ' A isszia.... iA. lus.ti V dit ---,•••--- MWRE: INIF•4! .. OfieldtV 'f‘' ZINN Er : • - 111M1512.. .-".W' ... ..' 111_6Elitilaf -• 4•J .. .. .4 •. - u..... ...-4 . . . ..,.. IMP • 1—i ,•• , ., A . ......,::„ „.. r.„,..., At ...... ,. _ Figure 3.4-A3 ORDINANCE NO.6380 I b. Park Block Street 416' 1 a 1144-41YrS •1 • Sired ; :.,itte i. Park Block Street with Angled Parking on One Side of the Street a 1 , �7 t t. Photo Source:Corvallis Riverfront,Google Maps (a) The street shall be one way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk adjacent to the development. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone on the Development side of the street between the curb and sidewalk. Appurtenances may include trees in tree wells, bicycle parking, tables, benches, street lights, landscaping, public art, etc. (d) There shall be decorative street lighting. (e) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (f) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (g) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. Page 11 of 26 ORDINANCF NO. 6380 (h) The park block from curb to curb shall be a minimum of 150'. (i) The angled parking dimensions from the Springfield Development Code shall be used. (j) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' out from the angled parking striping. (k) Angled parking shall only be on one side of the street. (I) Storm water treatment shall be installed between the curb and sidewalk. It shall treat all impervious surfaces that are in the public right of way and shall be sized accordingly. (m) There shall be a minimum 8' sidewalk between the stormwater treatment and park block. (n) The travel lane shall be 10' wide. Page 12 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 ,„•,4',',,,,,,•:!,;,--. -. 4.11:0„,:, 1.',,,T.,„ •'--",-0.k-* ,-'••,, tc. W ;4_3., `'.1,''''''f'•''; -"4 -41. .•'''''s Pi.0 CZ 0e-;'.'I` •A - ' 4; . y -•-. • . –..,, . . -- _ . , Ii—.4 _ _ t.-...."•__,,./'.N. -:-, '''''' • • .. •,t . ---, -- • ,, ;.•i I cf) , 0 it a• T 7' 17 197 10 7' 7'! W ,iii."..Y.:;•'.79. ,i' . ... " -e', "e z .. .„.„ . i:,•-t,..N., r - --414,--,- 0 •*-0-,0 --;:. — ......,-,s. . -...,_ ...1.r..„4.,,, ,;‘,-,•••., '.0-*-11 -' - - 0 4.. , . , ... .s•6., 0, . .. , •. , • ,,,,,, 6 9 .IF '1 r• M..--—n rt7".- . SECTION VIEW' ,,,, 41eS11.---0 a 7;'-''''..: 14'1 )—( V es .,,,--- , .--„,‘• ... ar - (ft, ...- v, 4s, ,...----",_A INEL• </ IRM 1111'' ,--- tit. 1, Mk , , rqpill.. ,,,_,...-41111E1 -tiff Ii /v-" 00. .2 % in '.liblit Z : . et..4%. -••• NE. . ' .'" --;•;-museigt.t.tott.o.....--...i.tani immt........ ot... •..t...V -.1' I --71,tlil. MC'- 1::' • ,.. Jr . .,.. ... _ Als! ,. J 'Plogr 1% r. -,,-' I r... st . ,----" Ilk,. _.---- 1 0 ' Of 14 im fli, „; ,-,,, .:., A .v. -— I 4' 0•_.:,: .4Nlia A. 44-,kor v Ir 41.51< ..-li 00,0,00*- rf % ..... -4 := •:„. 0,A.-..•....44 E'l liffitA 111 .§ to,- 1\"••• 11 A. ... ..itaiNt --frN. am C.) *1 Mr11:-.,; ligitil 0 r .... SISIY q. 77.110 /41 la .4 1 .1.e T - .ti IIC Ilialrk ',-"-- !K._ • -.-''- .,...,-._ PLAN VIEW .1 Figure 3.4-131 Page 13 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 ii. Park Block Street with Parallel Parking on Both Sides of the Street L • ' • • b 1sz I �Y• .i ' • * Photo Source:Portland,Google Maps (a) The street shall be one way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk adjacent to the development. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone on the Development side of the street between the curb and sidewalk. Appurtenances may include trees in tree wells, bicycle parking, tables, benches, street lights, landscaping, public art, etc. (d) There shall be decorative street lighting. (e) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (f) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (g) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (h) The park block from curb to curb shall be a minimum of 150'. (i) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' out from the parking striping. (I) Bulb-outs should be staggered to create the narrow travel way. (k) Parallel parking stall widths shall be 7' wide. (I) Storm water treatment shall be installed between the curb and adjacent sidewalk. It shall treat all impervious surfaces that are in the public right of way and shall be sized accordingly. (m) There shall be a minimum 8' sidewalk between the storm water treatment and park block. (n) The travel lane shall be 10' wide. (o) A 2' paved pedestrian travel way shall be between the parking lane and the storm water treatment. Page 14 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 .. cr) [J,... • , . ,.....". -.. ...---' 't)L-3.-9- :... ' ..... is... ) ,.1 • .s 4 .- lle Un ,.. . 1 0 ..-, ..,.„.. .. it 141 . . ...1 .... • at,,,,,,h .11.1 A it rTii-4 -•• ' i 41 r______ ,-,-, 11,..a, .1 1 •=•,' , ,' . • 0 IL, Tie, v 8. T TI 9. 1O 9: 9' T T -.... E-1 -+ SECTION VIEW - - --- .- - ii Of, 1"--- 4f; .15 tal (ft -aim P-i ir ' ISM FE EZS Mil .. ,. -time ... .. k, -s - .. :111.1111111111E- 'Mr — , 512 g --or low 1 6T4 ;21 GP • 'iii.ali " ". .4!. .!','''.:111, .3 MIN ✓ 1.•' :ex. 11111r . 2 -"IN 1-.1 .., 0 tl r, i - ' — — t. IIIIIIIIL - 4.-:it . _ 14 -alluummintittewl.-- -ifIl gs ....:._ 11 A A - • ...ir .1- . ,,, , X ti , _. i .: • -2, 1.1111331‘ ask MEM '44 '11 . .,...,,..-•••••••••• _.4 AM PE liN 0• Ns di gis..,-, .i.....„,... 4„,, INISPI:%•.:.•.•"terifig:f ar .••,, i „ 0. iiall A. . 73 H ,,,, g_ _ 31 ,.. . Ci a iii 1 __Iii 4331 N •Pill. -,.„''• -.:-',,,.- 0,.=, fi ii! 141111 W ri. Fiii --7r. 2t .. 0.10 Ilinii 0.0 '§itni no,i.,,, ALic, kir ,iii .. . -,q 5 Lim§ Rh, .:,, • _03 El , 2 JE___ -513121 C.f) '''',I.r4 8' k El; Fc, .;issege IN Rip 9 , s. k... IN Gh. l';'' $6p '. R 9 nr I g iti .8;:13 0 Pia - • —2- 2 -(%-• — '.'• :Ma f 7 '' Si 5 '.6dIfitl 22• — 2, :,, . -....,.......,.- • - - • - PLAN VIEW Figure 3.4-B2 Page 15 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. b38U iii. Park Block Street with Parallel Parking on One Side of the Street i _<, ':- e 1 3:-X� yti Photo Source:Hillsboro,Google Maps (a) The street shall be one way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk adjacent to the development. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone on the Development side of the street between the curb and sidewalk. Appurtenances may include trees in tree wells, bicycle parking, tables, benches, street lights, landscaping, public art, etc. (d) There shall be decorative street lighting. (e) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (f) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (g) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (h) The park block from curb to curb shall be a minimum of 150'. (i) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' from the parking striping. (I) Parallel parking stall widths shall be 7' wide. (k) Storm water treatment shall be installed between the curb and sidewalk. It shall treat all impervious surfaces that are in the public right of way and shall be sized accordingly. (I) There shall be a minimum 2' paved walking width between the parking and storm water treatment area. (m) There shall be a minimum 8' sidewalk between the storm water treatment and park block. (n) The travel lane shall be 10' wide. Page 16 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 . I- I- WJ 1-i ... v• i ri 1 c Cf1—i 1 ,.,d , 1..•:' . . 1.f-4,. 641 t.1-. :•.:Pt. I 'LI; 4t_I .., a ,t°:.--4,-• - . • i'•'.. . .'. W , f,W, .r 4=e — 8. ?, • "7"... (CI ct r T 7 10 150 10' 0 7 7 t .4. C.) .-... .,., z '-- t . . . . .. ,. ' - `-- i--,---- SECTION VIEW i...6-.L' - •' '. ...... . . , _ .',.. . ,,--,,--4..p ,{ • 7 - -• . :._ ' ' • -. - .,,,..• :---: rr' :/-, - \ . ,... -- • " E___,' i ..., 'AN - • • ; . , r f, .,— ai• _..._:c '. ."0-- , _,<'. - .. — 1 r.,.•11)-... g , ...... 1 t . • , allitlelt 4 itZ ..• . . .y . Riprevv: I Ar A...4._ 1 .. .,-4,4111tit' 1111.Vir il C . ' - 1• I' 'T:- r'.. LI ..,If .. ,. f.I " W.J i pt . . i 1 i . I . . A 1,.1 f .1 t lit . A...i.i... -- .-,,.. --r .: - .; ,1, .-....:. CP la 8' I . Tr . • .... i -„. .A Co) I i ...., ma 0 . i ...:,.. pa go IL Er :. PLAN VIEW Figure 3.4-B3 Page 17 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. b38U r C. Collector Street gig 111. L'i1 r , i. Collector Street with Buffered Bike Lane Photo Source:Friends of Holgate (a) The street shall be two way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk adjacent to the development. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the curb and sidewalk. Appurtenances may include trees in tree wells, bicycle parking, tables, benches, street lights, landscaping, public art, etc. (d) There shall be decorative street lighting. (e) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (f) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (g) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (h) Parking bulb-outs shall be a minimum of 9' wide. Page 18 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 dam (i) Parallel parking stall widths shall be 7' wide. (j) Travel lane shall be 10'wide. (k) Bicycle lanes shall be 6'wide with a striped 2' buffered area between the bicycle lane and the travel lane and a striped 2' buffered area between the bicycle lane and parking lane. Page 19 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 SECTION VIEW W k.r �r-. a} 4 11 _ . .., . 1 __,,..,.. . .. ,,,,• , "'+. .=-74.= Lam.. ii W Sp cab T T 9' 6' 2 10' 10' 6' 9' 7' T ii . 1. / :Ia� / F EV $ ' EIE " ' i _ Nil Clise IN 0 I • ■■■■:■■■ :. lig 111N , ..■ _ __ii•. r■ ■■ P ,•! R ' : / t .om.S'r.;41-___ i rtz NZ 4P, rko it g : to—N., 1E 0 r ti:. r u c..T It4:-. V 3 MI al —� , rwr. El 0 l+ )5 ... ,...., 40_ y i k ifil 0 I ; / N DE U rE d 4r0 it , s _ a ,......• ! 4 • ._,..,,..c.. g ..&, g Figure 3.4-C1 PLAN VIEW ii. Collector Street with Separated Bike Lane r ; .. + r X'44v. A t F r.wa :: • • f N.00, 1' ",,,, r Photo Source:www.bikelongbeach.org (a) The street shall be two way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk adjacent to the development. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the curb and sidewalk. Appurtenances may include trees in tree wells, bicycle parking, tables, benches, street lights, landscaping, public art, etc. (d) There shall be decorative street lighting. (e) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (f) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (g) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (h) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' out from the parking striping. (i) Parallel parking stall widths shall be 7' wide. (j) Travel lane shall be 10' wide. (k) Bicycle lanes shall be 6' wide with a 3' buffered area between the bicycle lane and the parking lane and elevated to the same elevation as the sidewalk to not be at the same grade as the parking lane. Page 21 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 1 ih, '''' .J•:4 -. SECTION VIEW i., lli pIII ..:-,.Ai A--•-.,- X 1 — '1,...-.0 •-. 1 •• . -...., • • -. !‘rr-i-'1.147?..4t.„, <I* 1r. •• . .0.'..... ." Me F....J 4•1 cif v A 7' 7 6' 3. 6 ur la Fr 3' 6. 7 7 I t , I .._ ,...,„•-, tiv.. 1 ,,,, :. .... . .IL + (:•.::,) . . i •* "".., - '7 .. . ...,, H — -',• 77--- •. , . i'41.1.. -- fler. -':.;::;44''.i- ..'...'-'•f • ..,4, clmr.si in, ' . 1-1-0,,,„ I _,,,., tlin i 1 1 I 1 i jig ..S.'..... Ewa - -r.- 1 . ,. ,1 SI BIM .:-..,.• Pmi re i I I s+4tet ilt$41 til totAii ti t4kikAg!' 6 4!id ge I ht.1.1404/9 .'. -:.- m7rr: .4 - , ipiellir 1, , • 1210,.;..;,L.":.•-:"• 1I ,,..,::.,:. A :1 x i / i Ilk . inn iiii011011111 , _ • • i..s.... • EWE EL '''--2.1. EOM Mar' i. . r..1"-.1.'::. ..7.-- • '-z.:•• 114 .1r4. t"'"" viLe'''' •---' ."'",,, :::,;...ri: i,'..,.:,, i fir I H .." .1 Pi 111111 (4,,i .. .. . U II .,,, : , 1.-- ....„4, .„ A• 45.„, 0 .,_. - • 1-7 .. PO.•-.. :;till I 1. • - . 44. Figure 3.4-C2 PLAN VIEW ORDtNANCE NO. 6380 d. Typical Street 1 r wrm-.+eewr ,F� r. .................. ,. --....1..,i 'J� � s . ITYPcareei 1 \ a ,; , _..2 S I Typical Street with Parallel Parking ° , 1 a • :j : anti • :41'17 'I' `�= .►i�iar. r" imbil , 6 , N � Photo Source:Kristi Krueger at Orenco Station (a) The street shall be two way. (b) There shall be a minimum 7' setback sidewalk on each side of the street. (c) There shall be a minimum 7' amenity zone between the curb and sidewalk. Appurtenances may include trees in tree wells, bicycle parking, tables, benches, street lights, landscaping, public art, etc. (d) There shall be decorative street lighting. (e) All intersections shall be raised with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. (f) Decorative bollards shall be used at the curb returns of the raised intersections. (g) All pedestrian crosswalks shall be raised crosswalks with a distinctive stamped pattern and vibrant color. Page 23 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 (h) Parking bulb-outs shall extend 2' out from the parking striping. (i) Parallel parking stall widths shall be 7' wide. (j) Travel lanes shall be 10' wide. Page 24 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380 SECTION VIEW 1 r. I ; I I Li) I Z .. aI 6 (io A O r T 9' 10' 10' 9' T T . •V. . < Altilii Iii . I L 3 .... - Ili )...] sis E,,, 1 !i '■i ..-.,...,..„: . s:. � E. 1i , , _ . illi '' ' I n ■ ■ • l . _ ®� � � � Sr '1 kill mem!is` A .ilY n...3.- < fps' 1 1 1 iI Y !1.0 : 411, —t , u --..4Ari ' . 10,.,,, r : _ 1 i IL' - s iIv:am 1 NSF t. — : 'v..' . inl 1 PLAN VIEW Figure 3.4-D1 ORDINANCE NO. 638U Commentary: Incorporate references to the Development Code standards proposed for adoption through the TSP Implementation Project. ...[no intervening amendments]... D. Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be required: off-street as part of the multi-use path as specified in Subsection 3.4-270E.; on-street; or as part of a mid-block connector. 1. Bicycle facilities in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and Open Space Chapters. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. 3. Bicycle facilities including, but not limited to: mid-block connectors and on-street markings, shall be designed and constructed as specified in Subsection 4.2-150, the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Springfield Standard Construction Specifications. 4. Bicycle parking shall be as specified in Table 3.4-2. E. Multi-Use Path. The multi-use path shall be part of the riverfront linear park along the entire length of the Willamette River in the Glenwood Riverfront. The multi-use path shall provide opportunities for active and passive recreation activities, including but not limited to: walking; jogging; running; cycling; inline skating; and nature watching. The multi-use path shall be located at the outermost edge of the 75 foot-wide Greenway Setback Line/Riparian Setback to the maximum extent practicable. 1. The multi-use path shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and Open Space Chapters. 2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and Open Space Chapter policies and implementation strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3. 3. The multi-use path shall be designed and constructed as specified in Subsection 4.2-150, the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Springfield Standard Construction Specifications. Page 26 of 26 ORDINANCE NO. 6380