Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 1/24/2006 TYPE II TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST SPRINGFIELD Project Name: Dove Estates SubdivIsion Project Proposal: Subdivide 2 1 acres Into 14 lots with private street, proposed density 6 du/acre Case Number: PRE 2006-00007 PrOject Address: 1057 Anderson Lane Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-33-11 TLl01 Zoning: UF-10 w/LDR ApplIcable Refmement Plan: NA Refmement Plan Designation: Metro Plan Designation: LDR Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 A~tion Submittal Deadline: July 24, 2006 "~i~ted Applications: LRP 2005-00040 (Annexation), ZON 2005-00011 (DIM) &Kh?5/ he-- ajljf rrrt'/ 7~t7 /tJ& ," CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE Planner Land Use Plannlnq Linda Paulv 726-4608 TransDortatlon Plannlnq Enqlneer TransDortatlon Garv McKennev 726-4585 Public Works CIvil Enqlneer Utilities Steve Barnes 736-1036 Public Works EIT Sanltarv & Storm Sewer Matt Stouder 736-1035 DeDutv Fire Marshall Fire and Life Safetv Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 Communltv Services Manaqer Buildlnq Dave Puent 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Applicant: Vern Benson 949 Hwy 99 N Eugene, OR 97401 Applicant's Rep: Dave Collier Pacific SurveYing 75506 Blue Mountain School Rd Cottage Grove, OR {7421 1/24/06 Dat", Rerelved Planner AL I ~ '1/ ffJOb . I TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ D D 8 V," x 11" Copy of Land DIVISion Plan o Copy of the deed and a prelIminary title report Issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances If the applicant IS not the property owner, written permission from the property owner IS required Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ D D o Tentative Land DiVision Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes [g] D D [g] D D D ~ D [g] D D D ~ D ~ D D D D ~ 1/24/06 Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor In accordance with ORS 92 All eXisting and proposed easements DimenSions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimenSions of each bUilding site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale Location, widths and names of all eXisting and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed land diVISion Location of eXisting and required traffic control deVices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, nelQhborhood mailbox units and Similar public facIlities Location and width of all eXisting and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Location, size and type of plantlngs and street trees In any required planter strip Dat€'I ReceIved Planner AL ;/2'1 hoot / / 2 [;0:l If!J [g] l?f] Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on and adJacent to the site Including sanitary sewer mainS, stormwater management systems, water mainS, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV Indicate the proposed connection pOints o Phased Development Plan required If redlvlslon IS proposed. The plan must Include the boundanes and sequencing of each proposed redlvlslon Any redlvlslon must progress In a sequence promoting street connectivity between the vanous phases of the development and accommodating other reqUired public Improvements Complete Incomplete See Notes CEl ~ Phased Development Plan [!j Notes: 1 Applicant has submitted this SubdivISion Tentative Plan Pre-submittal pnor to completion of staff's review and analYSIS of the concurrent annexation application To approve the annexation request, all key urban services and facilities must be Immediately available to serve the property or must be provided through an annexation agreement Thus, additional information and/or revIsions may be reqUired for review of the SubdivISion Tentative Plan The applicant can submit the SubdivISion application for review after annexation Issues are finalized, OR may submit the ap'plicatlon together With a request for extension of the 120-day penod ' ~1I! foj ~":'31C- - M "5 tWn1ittz.,e I\/~ AY\ ~. A7rta1'Y\.tMit' 1'5 t-U 'd. 2 Show setbacks for bUilding to be moved'dnto Lot 14 . r 3 Proposed bUilding sites must be shown which address SDC 16 040 Lot Coverage Standards, all applicable setbacks re SDC 16 050 and off-street parking SDC 16 070 4 If applicant chooses to revise the plan to Cluster Development, SDC 16 100 (3) standards must be addressed Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 1/24/06 Date Received Planner. AL , " 1/.;'1/1006 I I 3 ,P~&Z,/)~- 00007 9eN~ (:t::>dvlff 6t173 J '/Z4/tJ(; ~/. tvIe'KENNGiY TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST TRANSPORTATION N . P /Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has /'" frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facIlity. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Gill [!] Copy of ROW approach Permit Application rJ . ~ ~raffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer In / accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c) Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic Impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system In terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and Immediate and adJoining street systems. A TIA must also address, If needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and obJectives Complete Incomplete See Notes n:1 D Traffic Impact Study lSE 0 o Tentative land Division Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes LI Location and type of eXisting and proposed street IIghtmg IB- [II o l2l fi(j U) Ct.) Location, widths and names of all eXisting and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of- ways within or adJacent to the proposed land diVISion fa o o Location of eXisting and reqUired traffic control deVices Notes: (i) ~pc.- 3 z,.. . 0 ~ 0 ""DO t?J 'jl.P't' $c \''f\Z.l~ I\~ "l~e'" J4 ~f'tllT ?~[) '1 {4;> . (oz,)~., "to .A fo.l~~SOt-l. LklolE:. W-ILL. ~t?(Ll ~l;- L.,.. N,," 60.10.1.. -ry 'f8Utl1 T 7/21/04 Dat", f'ler.el'Jed Planner AL 1/2'1/L<J(Jb I I 4 TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existmg Conditions 1/24/06 Complete Incomplete See Notes I0iil ~ ~ ~ !2Q !2Q ~ !2Q ~ ~ !2Q ~ ~ !2Q ~ !0nl lSfJ !2Q ~ ~ !2Q I0iil t:.!J I0iil l!1J !2Q IT! IT! !2Q Ij<l I!'!:!'.I ~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer VICinity Map The name, location and dimenSions of all eXisting site features including bUildings, curb cuts, trees and ImpervIous surface areas, clearly indicating what IS remaining and what IS being removed ReqUired setbacks to the proposed new property lines for eXisting structures to remain on site The name, location, dimenSions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required npanan setback that are shown on the Water Quality limited Watercourse Map on file In the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundanes on the Site, as speCified In the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map ReVISion The Time of Travel Zones, as speCified In Article 17 of the Spnngfield Development Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file In the Development Services Department PhYSical features including, but not limited to trees S" In diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, Significant clusters of trees and shrubs, npanan areas, wetlands and rock outcropplngs Soil types and water table information as mapped and speCified In the Soils Survey of Lane County A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently If the Soils Survey Indicates the proposed development area has unstable SOils and/or a high water table Date RecE'lVed' Planner AL 1/.;1(;00DO I I 5 0 Tentative Land Division Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 ~ 0 ~ All eXisting and proposed easements ~ 0 0 DimenSions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ~ 0 0 Location and type of eXisting and proposed street lighting ~ 0 0 Location, widths and names of all eXisting and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed land divIsion ~ ~ ~ Location of eXisting and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities 0 ~ ~ Location and width of all eXisting and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails 0 ~ ~ Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip ~ 0 0 Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mainS, stormwater management systems, water mainS, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV Indicate the proposed connection pOints 0 Gradmg and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed CIvil Engineer ~ 0 0 Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ~ 0 0 Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ~ 0 0 Pervious and ImperVIOUS area drainage patterns 1/24/06 Date ~ecelved Planner. AL I p'{ ltt'Po I I 6 IZl ~ IZl The size and location of stormwater management -- systems components, Including but not limited to drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds, stormwater quality measures, and natural dralnageways to be retained IZl ~ jg] EXisting and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot Intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot Intervals) IZl ~ ~ Amount of proposed cut and fill 24. o Stormwater Management System Study provide four (4) caples of the study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached (See attached for Stormwater Scoplng Sheet) The plan, calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Englneenng Design Standards and Procedures Manual Complete Incomplete See Notes ... ~ l8J Scoplng Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Notes: ] A pflvate street wIth no SIdewalks or street hghts IS proposed to serve 13 new lots 2 The US Postal ServIce has been reqUlflng a commumty mallbox umt for sImIlar new SUbdlvlslOns, especJally III the case of a pnvate road Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 3 A SIdewalk IS requlfed on developmg lots adjacent to a fully 1ll1proved street The Anderson Lane frontage reqUIres a Sidewalk, as shown on the plans The Vlcmlty Map on Sheet] of] should show PlOneer Parkway and I-51 Eugene border to be of dlfectlona1 value You have to know where the site IS to use the Map that 15 shown S t",' M\.V.( "e~ L LV ,I" -r-;) Sfu"""",,,,,,.'l-ev ,f<./& j 4 5 b 1- ~ i11 '1 'I- f) I f<IV r 1/24/06 Date Received Planner AL (/u /2(JD( , I 7 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION Applicable Not ~ Applicable E!J Ii] [j] E!J << [j] E!J " Ii] [j] E!J [j] Proposed deed restnctlons and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster SubdiVIsion proposal as specified In SDC Section 16 100(3) Rlpanan Area Protection Report For properties located Within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or Within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tnbutanes of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently If there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area IS Within an overlay dlstnct applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay dlstnct ~ E!J If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified In SDC Article 38 [[] [[] A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon DIVISion of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there IS a wetland on the property [[] [8 Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or eVidence the permit application has been submitted for review ~ [[] Where any grading, filling or excavating IS proposed With the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted pnor to development [[]- fIJ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Vanance or E Modification of ProvIsions as specified In SDC Article 10 or 11 1/24/06 Date Received, Planner AL IPrf/.;006 , I 10 PReUX-J(P- c0007 I os! ~ sv-v--- SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION ~ PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST '/;7lf/DL. FIRE If-l1-r o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ On-site vehicular circulation ~ ~ o Improvement and Public Ut,litles Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ LocatIOn of eXisting and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities ~ ~ Notes: Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application: ~ ~O"- lJ-::, ~ ~WL~ rL..? ~~- 4/6/04 Date Received Planner AL r/:l'I/zooo . I 11 THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE NOTE The applicant can submit the SubdivIsion application for review after annexation Issues are finalized, OR may submit the application together with a request for extension of the 120-day penod ~-fl y Planne~ ~ j-Z4-/;} Date This IS not a decision on your applIcatIOn. Spnngfield Development Code Sections 3 050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227 178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decIsion within 120 days after the application IS deemed complete The 120- day processing penod for this application begins when all the missing Information IS submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the Information You must Indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a wntten response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provIsion of the missing information If you indicate herein or In your wntten response that the missing Information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal ReView to provide the City with the missing information If you refuse to submit the missing Information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- day clock and begin processing the application No new Information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day penod unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time Upon receipt of a request for extenSion, the City may extend the 120-day penod for a reasonable penod of time The City may also require additional fees If the new Information IS submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners IS sent out and a second notification IS reqUired or If the new Information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review IS reqUired I, the owner/applicant, mtend to submit all missing Items indicated herein to the City within the iSO-day timehne. ___~ 2> Owner/Applicant's Signature 1/24/06 DatA ReceIved I/.Z.'I/2tJt16 ,i' --.. I Planner Al II City of Spflngfield Development ServIces Department 225 FIfth Street Spflngfield, Oregon 97477 Phone (541) 726-3759 Fax (541)726-3689 WaIver and Request for Extension SPRINGFIELD Planrung Journal # '" _. _._~~_ ~_- ,~- (Today's Date) I/We unde;~ it.. fr ,!!:", :i~~f;:;~~", ~8) requIres the City to take final achon on the above referenced _ 1f77/~t.lVll 'If .}i:{.r'':t of all appeals, wlthm 120 days after the apphcatlon IS deemed cc 5"1Jh I iA,u /h..:- .{~>1~ ~ II ;.7"1 I~ ~ ~~~ I/We unde 'll - LA ~ ~ :~~ ;~t':::,;:~, ed above was deemed complete by the CIty of Spnngfield Planmng I ~ '7/-i.~ _ 'i':5,c -'" _ ~_;;;;:-" , Accordmgly, the I20-day penod WIll elapse on !- ~ ~~ ~~":..:::_ :i""l. z; ........~: ..<............b-1=-~ Spflngfield staff has explamed that the addlhonal tune IS needed for the followmg conSideratIOn In order to allow Spnngfield Planmng Staff more hme to address those conslderahons, we hereby waive that 120-day reqUIrement and request an extensIOn until This extensIOn IS gIVen freely and WithOUt compulSIOn by the CIty, and----;,, - I, - - --- ---I the taking of any actIOn on the above referenced apphcatlOn I' /;K . 1 Smcerely, &/t~m/~1 \ Date tf ;1~~ - fttltmjl/U' i I Date .- -- - - Owners ACCEPTED Date Cay of Spnngfield Planmng DIVISion THE EXTENDED PERIOD GRANTED BY THIS REQUEST AND WAIVER WILL ELAPSE ON //;'I/zoot / I Date Received Planner AL