HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 1/24/2006
TYPE II TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION,
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
SPRINGFIELD
Project Name: Dove Estates SubdivIsion
Project Proposal: Subdivide 2 1 acres Into 14 lots with private street, proposed density 6
du/acre
Case Number: PRE 2006-00007
PrOject Address: 1057 Anderson Lane
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-33-11 TLl01
Zoning: UF-10 w/LDR
ApplIcable Refmement Plan: NA
Refmement Plan Designation:
Metro Plan Designation: LDR
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 24, 2006
A~tion Submittal Deadline: July 24, 2006
"~i~ted Applications: LRP 2005-00040 (Annexation), ZON 2005-00011 (DIM)
&Kh?5/ he-- ajljf rrrt'/ 7~t7 /tJ&
,"
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE
Planner Land Use Plannlnq Linda Paulv 726-4608
TransDortatlon Plannlnq Enqlneer TransDortatlon Garv McKennev 726-4585
Public Works CIvil Enqlneer Utilities Steve Barnes 736-1036
Public Works EIT Sanltarv & Storm Sewer Matt Stouder 736-1035
DeDutv Fire Marshall Fire and Life Safetv Gilbert Gordon 726-2293
Communltv Services Manaqer Buildlnq Dave Puent 726-3668
APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Applicant:
Vern Benson
949 Hwy 99 N
Eugene, OR 97401
Applicant's Rep:
Dave Collier
Pacific SurveYing
75506 Blue Mountain School Rd
Cottage Grove, OR {7421
1/24/06
Dat", Rerelved
Planner AL
I ~ '1/ ffJOb
. I
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees
o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11"
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ D D
8 V," x 11" Copy of Land DIVISion Plan
o Copy of the deed and a prelIminary title report Issued within the past 60 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances If the applicant IS not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner IS required
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ D D
o Tentative Land DiVision Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
[g] D D
[g] D D
D ~ D
[g]
D
D
D
~
D
~
D
D
D
D
~
1/24/06
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor In
accordance with ORS 92
All eXisting and proposed easements
DimenSions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimenSions of each bUilding site
indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Location, widths and names of all eXisting and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land diVISion
Location of eXisting and required traffic control
deVices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
nelQhborhood mailbox units and Similar public facIlities
Location and width of all eXisting and proposed
sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways
and bike trails
Location, size and type of plantlngs and street trees In
any required planter strip
Dat€'I ReceIved
Planner AL
;/2'1 hoot
/ /
2
[;0:l
If!J
[g]
l?f]
Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on
and adJacent to the site Including sanitary sewer
mainS, stormwater management systems, water
mainS, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV Indicate
the proposed connection pOints
o Phased Development Plan required If redlvlslon IS proposed. The plan must Include
the boundanes and sequencing of each proposed redlvlslon Any redlvlslon must
progress In a sequence promoting street connectivity between the vanous phases of the
development and accommodating other reqUired public Improvements
Complete
Incomplete See
Notes
CEl ~
Phased Development Plan
[!j
Notes:
1 Applicant has submitted this SubdivISion Tentative Plan Pre-submittal pnor to
completion of staff's review and analYSIS of the concurrent annexation application To
approve the annexation request, all key urban services and facilities must be
Immediately available to serve the property or must be provided through an annexation
agreement Thus, additional information and/or revIsions may be reqUired for review of
the SubdivISion Tentative Plan The applicant can submit the SubdivISion application for
review after annexation Issues are finalized, OR may submit the ap'plicatlon together
With a request for extension of the 120-day penod ' ~1I! foj ~":'31C- - M
"5 tWn1ittz.,e I\/~ AY\ ~. A7rta1'Y\.tMit' 1'5 t-U 'd.
2 Show setbacks for bUilding to be moved'dnto Lot 14 . r
3 Proposed bUilding sites must be shown which address SDC 16 040 Lot Coverage
Standards, all applicable setbacks re SDC 16 050 and off-street parking SDC 16 070
4 If applicant chooses to revise the plan to Cluster Development, SDC 16 100 (3)
standards must be addressed
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
1/24/06
Date Received
Planner. AL
, "
1/.;'1/1006
I I
3
,P~&Z,/)~- 00007 9eN~ (:t::>dvlff 6t173 J
'/Z4/tJ(; ~/. tvIe'KENNGiY
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
TRANSPORTATION
N . P /Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
/'" frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facIlity.
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ Gill [!] Copy of ROW approach Permit Application
rJ . ~ ~raffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer In
/ accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c) Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to
analyze and evaluate the traffic Impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system In terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and Immediate and adJoining street systems. A TIA must also
address, If needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
obJectives
Complete Incomplete
See
Notes
n:1
D
Traffic Impact Study
lSE 0
o Tentative land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete
See
Notes
LI
Location and type of eXisting and proposed street
IIghtmg
IB- [II
o
l2l
fi(j U)
Ct.)
Location, widths and names of all eXisting and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of-
ways within or adJacent to the proposed land diVISion
fa
o
o
Location of eXisting and reqUired traffic control deVices
Notes:
(i) ~pc.- 3 z,.. . 0 ~ 0 ""DO t?J 'jl.P't'
$c \''f\Z.l~ I\~ "l~e'" J4
~f'tllT
?~[) '1 {4;> .
(oz,)~., "to .A fo.l~~SOt-l. LklolE:. W-ILL.
~t?(Ll ~l;- L.,.. N,," 60.10.1.. -ry 'f8Utl1 T
7/21/04
Dat", f'ler.el'Jed
Planner AL
1/2'1/L<J(Jb
I I
4
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existmg Conditions
1/24/06
Complete
Incomplete
See
Notes
I0iil
~
~
~
!2Q
!2Q
~
!2Q
~
~
!2Q
~
~
!2Q
~
!0nl
lSfJ
!2Q
~
~
!2Q
I0iil
t:.!J
I0iil
l!1J
!2Q
IT!
IT!
!2Q
Ij<l
I!'!:!'.I
~
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
VICinity Map
The name, location and dimenSions of all eXisting site
features including bUildings, curb cuts, trees and
ImpervIous surface areas, clearly indicating what IS
remaining and what IS being removed
ReqUired setbacks to the proposed new property
lines for eXisting structures to remain on site
The name, location, dimenSions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required npanan
setback that are shown on the Water Quality limited
Watercourse Map on file In the Development Services
Department
The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundanes on
the Site, as speCified In the latest adopted FEMA
Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter
of Map Amendment or Letter of Map ReVISion
The Time of Travel Zones, as speCified In Article 17 of
the Spnngfield Development Code and delineated on
the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file In the
Development Services Department
PhYSical features including, but not limited to trees S"
In diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet
above the ground, Significant clusters of trees and
shrubs, npanan areas, wetlands and rock
outcropplngs
Soil types and water table information as mapped
and speCified In the Soils Survey of Lane County A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must
be submitted concurrently If the Soils Survey
Indicates the proposed development area has
unstable SOils and/or a high water table
Date RecE'lVed'
Planner AL
1/.;1(;00DO
I I
5
0 Tentative Land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
~ 0 ~ All eXisting and proposed easements
~ 0 0 DimenSions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of each building site
indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
~ 0 0 Location and type of eXisting and proposed street
lighting
~ 0 0 Location, widths and names of all eXisting and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land divIsion
~ ~ ~ Location of eXisting and required traffic control
devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
0 ~ ~ Location and width of all eXisting and proposed
sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways
and bike trails
0 ~ ~ Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in
any required planter strip
~ 0 0 Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mainS, stormwater management systems, water
mainS, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV Indicate
the proposed connection pOints
0 Gradmg and Paving Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed CIvil Engineer
~ 0 0 Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
~ 0 0 Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
~ 0 0 Pervious and ImperVIOUS area drainage patterns
1/24/06
Date ~ecelved
Planner. AL
I p'{ ltt'Po
I I
6
IZl ~ IZl The size and location of stormwater management
--
systems components, Including but not limited to
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds, stormwater quality measures, and natural
dralnageways to be retained
IZl ~ jg] EXisting and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot Intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
Intervals)
IZl ~ ~ Amount of proposed cut and fill
24.
o Stormwater Management System Study provide four (4) caples of the study with
the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached (See attached for Stormwater
Scoplng Sheet) The plan, calculations and documentation must be consistent with the
Englneenng Design Standards and Procedures Manual
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
... ~ l8J
Scoplng Sheet and attached Stormwater
Management System Study
Notes:
] A pflvate street wIth no SIdewalks or street hghts IS proposed to serve 13 new lots
2 The US Postal ServIce has been reqUlflng a commumty mallbox umt for sImIlar new SUbdlvlslOns, especJally III the
case of a pnvate road
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
3
A SIdewalk IS requlfed on developmg lots adjacent to a fully 1ll1proved street The Anderson Lane frontage
reqUIres a Sidewalk, as shown on the plans
The Vlcmlty Map on Sheet] of] should show PlOneer Parkway and I-51 Eugene border to be of dlfectlona1 value
You have to know where the site IS to use the Map that 15 shown
S t",' M\.V.( "e~ L LV ,I" -r-;)
Sfu"""",,,,,,.'l-ev ,f<./& j
4
5
b
1-
~
i11 '1 'I- f) I f<IV
r
1/24/06
Date Received
Planner AL
(/u /2(JD(
, I
7
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THE APPLICANT
SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION
Applicable Not ~
Applicable
E!J Ii]
[j] E!J
<<
[j] E!J
"
Ii]
[j]
E!J
[j]
Proposed deed restnctlons and a draft of any Homeowner's
Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster
SubdiVIsion proposal as specified In SDC Section 16 100(3)
Rlpanan Area Protection Report For properties located Within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited
Watercourses (WQLW) or Within 100 feet of the top of bank of
any direct tnbutanes of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently If there are unstable soils and/or a high
water table present
Where the development area IS Within an overlay dlstnct
applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay
dlstnct
~ E!J If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified In SDC Article 38
[[] [[] A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon DIVISion of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there IS a wetland
on the property
[[] [8 Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or eVidence the permit application has been
submitted for review
~ [[] Where any grading, filling or excavating IS proposed With the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted pnor to development
[[]- fIJ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Vanance or
E
Modification of ProvIsions as specified In SDC Article 10 or 11
1/24/06
Date Received,
Planner AL
IPrf/.;006
, I
10
PReUX-J(P- c0007
I os! ~ sv-v---
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION ~
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST '/;7lf/DL.
FIRE If-l1-r
o Site Plan
Complete Incomplete
See
Notes
~
On-site vehicular circulation
~ ~
o Improvement and Public Ut,litles Plan
Complete Incomplete
See
Notes
~
LocatIOn of eXisting and required fire hydrants and
similar public facilities
~ ~
Notes:
Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application:
~ ~O"- lJ-::, ~
~WL~
rL..? ~~-
4/6/04
Date Received
Planner AL
r/:l'I/zooo
. I
11
THIS APPLICATION IS:
o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
NOTE The applicant can submit the SubdivIsion application for review after annexation
Issues are finalized, OR may submit the application together with a request for extension of
the 120-day penod
~-fl
y Planne~ ~
j-Z4-/;}
Date
This IS not a decision on your applIcatIOn. Spnngfield Development Code Sections
3 050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227 178 require the City take final action on a
limited land use decIsion within 120 days after the application IS deemed complete The 120-
day processing penod for this application begins when all the missing Information IS
submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the Information You must
Indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a wntten response to the City within
seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provIsion of the
missing information If you indicate herein or In your wntten response that the missing
Information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was
submitted for Pre-Submittal ReView to provide the City with the missing information If you
refuse to submit the missing Information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and
processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-
day clock and begin processing the application No new Information may be submitted after
the start of the 120-day penod unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the
120-day processing time Upon receipt of a request for extenSion, the City may extend the
120-day penod for a reasonable penod of time The City may also require additional fees If
the new Information IS submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners IS
sent out and a second notification IS reqUired or If the new Information substantially affects
the application proposal and additional review IS reqUired
I, the owner/applicant, mtend to submit all missing Items indicated herein to the
City within the iSO-day timehne.
___~ 2>
Owner/Applicant's Signature
1/24/06
DatA ReceIved I/.Z.'I/2tJt16
,i' --.. I
Planner Al
II
City of Spflngfield
Development ServIces Department
225 FIfth Street
Spflngfield, Oregon 97477
Phone (541) 726-3759
Fax (541)726-3689
WaIver and
Request for Extension
SPRINGFIELD
Planrung Journal #
'" _. _._~~_ ~_- ,~- (Today's Date)
I/We unde;~ it.. fr ,!!:", :i~~f;:;~~", ~8) requIres the City to take final achon on the above
referenced _ 1f77/~t.lVll 'If .}i:{.r'':t of all appeals, wlthm 120 days after the apphcatlon IS
deemed cc 5"1Jh I iA,u /h..:- .{~>1~
~ II ;.7"1 I~ ~ ~~~
I/We unde 'll - LA ~ ~ :~~ ;~t':::,;:~, ed above was deemed complete by the CIty of Spnngfield
Planmng I ~ '7/-i.~ _ 'i':5,c -'" _ ~_;;;;:-" , Accordmgly, the I20-day penod WIll elapse on
!- ~ ~~ ~~":..:::_ :i""l. z; ........~: ..<............b-1=-~
Spflngfield staff has explamed that the addlhonal tune IS needed for the followmg conSideratIOn
In order to allow Spnngfield Planmng Staff more hme to address those conslderahons, we hereby waive
that 120-day reqUIrement and request an extensIOn until
This extensIOn IS gIVen freely and WithOUt compulSIOn by the CIty, and----;,, - I, - - --- ---I
the taking of any actIOn on the above referenced apphcatlOn I' /;K . 1
Smcerely, &/t~m/~1 \
Date tf ;1~~ -
fttltmjl/U' i
I
Date
.- -- - -
Owners
ACCEPTED
Date
Cay of Spnngfield
Planmng DIVISion
THE EXTENDED PERIOD GRANTED BY THIS REQUEST AND WAIVER WILL ELAPSE ON
//;'I/zoot
/ I
Date Received
Planner AL