HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication PLANNER 1/14/2008 (2)
. I ,
PRE-SUBMITTAL
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
/- J 5 -()f:
Date Distributed:
,/ Dave Puent - Building
v Gilbert GordonlMelissa Fechtel- Fire
v Gary McKenney - Traffic
2 Matt Stouder- Public Works/Engineering
Les Benoy - Public Works/Engineering
Dennis Ernst/Jon Driscoll, Surveying
Planner, J;t;J~
City of Spnngfield
. Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Spnngfield, OR 97477
541-725-3753 Phone
541-726-3689 Fax
PRE.SllBMlTI~L REC'D
JAN 1 4 200B
Pre-Submittal Meeting
Case Number Assigned: PRE2008-00006
Date Submitted: 1/14/2008
PrOJect Name' RIVERBEND MANOR PART 255 DEADM
PrOject DeSCriptIOn. Pre-Submittal meetmg for tentative Partition for creatIOn of 2 duplex lots
ApplIcatIOn Type: PartitIOn Tentative
Job Address: 255 DEADMOND FERRY RD
Assessor's & Tax Lot #: 1703154001500
DISCLAIMER ApplicatIOns wIll nol be exempl from Developmenl Code or procedural amendments Ihal may occur
beiween Ihe tIme of Ihe Pre-SubmIttal Meetmg and SubmIttal of Ihe ApphcallOn for Developmenl ReVIew Please contact our
office at 541-726-3753 wllh any quesllOns or concems
A Planner will be aSSIgned the followmg busmess day and will contacl you to confirm the meetmg date and !lme
PlanJobPrmt rpt
1114/2008
2 36 09PM
PRE-SllBMITT6,l REC'D
JAN 1 4 200B
Pre-Submittal Meeting
Development Services Department
Room 615/616
PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, January 22,2008
1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2008-00006 (pART TENT) BERRY $336
Assessor's Map: 17-03-15-40 TL 1500
Address: 255 Deadmond Ferry Road
Existing Use. ResIdential
Applicant submItted plans to partItion one lot into two MDR duplex lots
Meeting Dateffime: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 nsn 616 10:00 -11:00 a.m.
Planner Steve Hopkins
2. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2008-00004 (SITE TENT) CLEARSPAN TRUSS
Assessor's Map. 17-02-31-21 TL800
Address. Commercial Avenue
Existing Use: Vacant
Applicant submitted plans to construct two new industnal buildings for Clearspan Truss
A 12,600 sq ft truss manufacturing plant, 1,500 sq ft office and lumber storage bUIldmg.
Meeting Date/Tune Tuesday, January 22, 2008 nsn 616 11:00 - noon
Planner. Steve Hopkins
City of Spnngfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Spnngfield, OR 97477
PRE.SlIBMlml RECD
JAN 1 4 ZOOB
Land Division Application, Type II
SubdiVISIon Tentative, PartitIOn TentatIve
. .-
Applicant Name:
Company:
Address:
Countr Manor No 3 LLC
462 S nn dale Ave, S nn field OR 97477
'" "'" ~
, k'
302-9790
485-3253
,,,,_cdWfPJl1lt&
Applicant's Rep.:
Company:
Address:
Pam Clark
Olson & Morns
380 Street SUite 200
Phone:
Fax:
OR 97477
" ~~!'S'0~-_i:"*i;tW~;n",,,,:::,,,,,
, I ,"",,%V:::'t~ tyfu,.,.j^'1it:M gjb,,_~' Y-v..4~
Ploperty Owner:
Company:
Address:
Harold & Earlene Ber
Countr Manor No 3, LLC
462 S nn dale Ave, S nn field, OR 97477
Phone: 541 968-0317
Fax:
A %~ <7,dg);JiWj;(dWf'&Q2_fll =. ^,,,,J_:::_<:<<f'~1L,(S"'!
,,,,, "
k"
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-15-4 TAX LOT NO(S): 1500
Property Address: 255 Deadmond Ferr Rd
Size of Property: 15,184 Acres 0 Square Feet ~
Proposed Name of Subdivision: \J a. 64__ J A-tA...>>o I~
~~ ~) ~ _ ___ 4U_~ ~, -, 1
Description of
Proposal: To partition 1 tax lot Into 2 duplex lots
dujacre
.
.
. , ~ .
Zoning:
Applicable Refinement Plan:
Location: City Limits 0
Associated Applications: ~'?'
'\<'''''7~ 'Rf(:l2'L~iUlli'JiV~draM: ~ ~ 1:
Pre-Submittal
Case No.: (1.1: 7<-\))~ f\Dt\&Date:
Case No.: Date:
Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $
TOTAL
Overlay District:
Plan Designation:
Urban Growth Boundary 0
I e-,~ s.
I / /4 ( u ~
I
Reviewed by:
Reviewed by:
Posta e Fee:
~
$
\ "!\.Qe;;R-2; l/2 '-/ UC
ReVIsed 12/4/2006 Brenda Jones
10' 0J~
~ 1 -!' ~ '"
Pf,~ --zee;'2; - $bCl'6
Steps in the Process:
PRE-SlIBMITTAL REC'D
JAN 1 4 ZOOB
1. The Applicant Submits a Pre-Submittal Meeting Application
The Pre-Submittal Application IS mandatory Please refer to the Spnngfield Fee Schedule for
the Pre-Submittal Application fee The submittal package must conform to the application
completeness checklist attached to this form You are required to submit 7 copies of the
submittal requirements packet for pre-submittal review Pre-submittal meetings will be
conducted every Tuesday and Fnday between 10 00 am and noon We will stnve to conduct
the Pre-Submittal meeting within five to seven working days of receiving the application
2. Applicant and the City conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
We strongly encourage you, the owner and design team to attend the Pre-Submittal meeting
The meeting will be held with representatives from Public Works Englneenng and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
DIvIsion The meeting will be scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes The Planner will provide you
with a Pre-Submittal Checklist at the end of the meeting specifying the Items required to
make the application complete-If It Isn't already complete You will then have 180 days to
make the application complete for submittal and acceptance by the City
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application
When you have addressed all of the Items on the Pre-Submittal Checklist, please submit 18
copies of the complete application to the City A fee will be collected at that time and the 120
day calendar review penod will begin When the Planner has prepared a draft land use
decIsion, the draft will be mailed/faxed to the applicant/owner/design team for their review
At the applicant's request, the planner will schedule a meeting to review the draft with
appropnate staff If certain Issues need resolution before the final land use deCISion IS Issued
Owner's Signature
This application will be used for both the required Pre-Submittal Meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal Owner's signatures are required at both stages In the application
process An application without the Owner's signature will not be accepted.
--:>,sc.'6 - (J;J:DCl::- Date Submitted'
The undersigned acknowledges that the information In this application IS correct and accurate for
scheduling of the Pre-Submittal Meeting
Owner ~ 4 lli....... Date. / ~ g'~ Or;
Signature ( C::J--
JftPi?ld h, ~J
r nt
ReVIsed 11/20/2006 Brenda Jones
Land Division Submittal Requirements Checklist
PRE-SlIBMITTAl REC'D
JAN 1 4 ZOOB
*If you feel an Item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to
this form
1. Application fee-refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropnate fee
calculation formula A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services
Department The application fee and current postage fee IS collected at the time of
complete application submittal
2. Copy of the deed and a prelimmary title report-one copy Issued within the past 30
days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances If the applicant IS not the
property owner, wntten permission from the property owner IS required
3. One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11", which will be
mailed as part of the required nelghbonng property notification packet
4. Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) factllty
S. Stormwater Management System Study-four copies of the study with the completed
Storm water Scoping Sheet attached The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual
6. Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer In accordance
with SDC Section 32 020(1)(c) Traffic Impact Studies (TlA) allow the City to analyze and
evaluate the traffic Impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation
system In general, a TlA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects
the transportation system In terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and
Immediate and adJoining street systems A TlA must also address, If needed, City, metro
plan and state land use and transportation policies and obJectives
7. Seven copies of the following plan sets for the Pre-Submittal Meeting
OR
Eighteen copies of the following plan sets for Complete Application Submittal
All of the following plans must Include the scale (appropriate to the area Involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 3D', 1" = 50' or 1" =
100'), north arrow, and date of preparation All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11"
and bound by rubber bands for submittal
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
[8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
[8J VIcinity Map
[8J The name, location and dimensions of all eXisting site features including butldlngs, curb
cuts, trees and ImperVIOUS surface areas, clearly Indicating what IS remaining and what
IS being removed
[8J Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for eXisting structures to remain
on site
[8J The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and reqUired riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality limited Watercourse
Map on file In the Development Services Department
ReVIsed 11/20/2006 Brenda Jones
PR!: ClH'l' "r'''l'rC'D
..-" IDllil, 1M It!:
C8J The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as spec~ h!:rU'Q~test
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map RevIsion
C8J The Time of Travel Zones, as specified In Article 17 of the Springfield Development
Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file In the Development
Services Department
C8J PhYSical features Including, but not limited to trees 5" In diameter or greater when
measured 4 '/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcrop pings
C8J Soil types and water table Information as mapped and specified In the Soils Survey of
Lane County A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently If the SOils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
sOils and/or a high water table
b. Tentative Land Division Plan
C8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor In accordance with ORS 92
C8J Location of all eXisting and proposed easements
C8J DimenSions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each bUilding
site Indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
C8J Location and type of eXisting and proposed street lighting
C8J Location, widths and names of all eXisting and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or
other rlght-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land divIsion
C8J Location of eXisting and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and Similar public facilities
C8J Location and width of all eXisting and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
C8J Location, size and type of plantlngs and street trees In any required planter strip
C8J Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site Including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV Indicate the proposed connection pOints
Phased Development Plan required If redlvlslon IS proposed. The plan must Include
the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redlvlslon Any redlvlslon must
progress In a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of
the development and accommodating other required public Improvements
c. Grading and Paving Plan
C8J Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer
C8J Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
C8J Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
C8J PervIous and Impervious area drainage patterns
C8J The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds, stormwater
quality measures, and natural dralnageways to be retained
C8J EXisting and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot Intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot Intervals)
C8J Amount of proposed cut and fill
,
Revised] 1/20/2006 Brenda Jones
8. Additional materials that may be required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES OR
THE PRE-APPLICATION REPORT AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 31.030:
~ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's ASSOCIation Agreement
~ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster SubdivIsion proposal as
specified In SDC Section 16 100(3)
~ Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top
of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
~ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently If
there are unstable sOils and/or a high water table present
~ Where the development area IS within an overlay district applicable, address the
additional standards of the overlay district
~ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified In
SDC Article 38
~ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon DIVISion of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there IS a wetland on the property
~ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or eVidence the
permit application has been submitted for review
~ Where any grading, filling or excavating IS proposed with the development, a Land and
Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application
~ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of ProvIsions as
specified In SDC Article 10 or 11
PR~-SUBMfn4l REC'D
JAN 1 4 ZOOB
Revised 11/20/2006 Brenda Jones
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
PRE2008-00006
255 Deadmond Ferry Road
I I
D FERRY RD
J
;::=~~
:.":-.~.e-:
~:&;;
~~::,,~....~~
:::=::~~~0-~
~:.":,,:1~~":.
~~~-....~~~~
~ f5t;~~":.;-~
SITE
Map 17-03-15-40
Tax Lot 1500,
North
...
PRE sum:I\;r~,l KEC'D
JAN lyOOB
~
~
:111: I
:111:
:1111
I'~
III
III
'll
1II1
;~
II ,
"I --
II
"I
11-
Ilf /--
III
1/1':'1
A I
1"1
I"
1"1
I: :1
III
1''1
I"
1II1
III
~
~
~
\,
~
\,
REVISIONS,
~
i~!1 ...aIJ+. mUk ~ -
alIi-
11111,
: :,; II I III ~ --z J
~ .~ IHmllIHIU
n~ IljlUmplil . ~
A ~~U i i
" I i II i -
.
DAT" ."... Site Development Plan Olson &
PllOJEIT"-.IIn....--, I'f!!\
"-..'-"-~~~ for Morns
--
orvini'm." River Bend ManDT ~ ...0$1.....
"."11:"""'"" _a_ Consultmg
nEv=,,,_ Spnngftetd Lcme Coun.ty ar.g= -'1:101)_ Engmeen;
w' EXP""~S '''''''' '''"'CloI'I.....mJ &Sur;eycl'S
(fJ
J:
Gl 8,0 r1
'"
...J
OLSON &
MloRRllS
A divIsion of
L BOlson & Associates Inc
Consultmg Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
SUite 200
Spnngfleld, Oregon 97477
(541) 302-9790
Fax (541) 485-3253
olsonandmorns com
t , J; ~ ,
. ~\.b. .-\..\.: h t I . ~
- , I)'
-"-'
TENTATIVE PARTITION APPLICATION FOR
COUNTRY MANOR NO 3, LLC
JAN 1 4 ZOOB
Date
January 14, 2008
Property Owner/ApplIcant
Country Manor No 3, LLC
2815 Wayside Lane
Sprmgfield, OR 97477
ProJ ect Coordmator/
Applicant's Representative
Olson & Morns
c/o Scott Morns, PE
380 Q Street, SUite 200
Spnngfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302-9790
Plannmg
Metro Plannmg, Inc
c/o Robert Stevens, AICP
370 Q Street
Spnngfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302-9830
Assessor's Map/Tax Lot
17-03-15-40/ TL 1500
Area of Request
Approximately 14,800 Square Feet
EXlstmg ZOlling
MDR (MedIUm-Density ReSidential)
Number of Parcels Proposed
2
Area of Parcel I
6,108 Square Feet
Area of Parcel 2
9,076 Square Feet
Backlrround
ThIS applicatIOn IS for a tentative partition at 255 Oeadmond Ferry Road wlthm
the Spnngfield CIty limits The site was annexed mto the City of Sprmgfield m
2005 ThiS property IS located Wlthm an MDR (medIUm-densIty reSIdential) zone
that has a mmlmum density of 10 umts per acre and a maximum of 20 umts per
acre per SDC (Spnngfield Development Code) SectIOn 3 2-205 The proposed
partition Will create two parcels (one bemg a panhandle lot) out of one eXlstmg
lot
Country Manor No 3, LLC TentatIve Partition
January 14, 2008
Page I
PRE-SClSMlmll REeD
JAN 1 -t 2008
There are eXlstmg Improvements on the subject property, mcludmg a smgle-farmly house and
oversized garage Both of these structures have been removed and will be replaced m the future
with multIple-family Ulllts The total number of UnIts wIll comply with the denSIty ranges set by
the SDC for an MDR zone
With thiS proposed partition plan, the applicant IS submlttmg a conceptual site plan showmg how
the development site could be developed m the future With duplex UnIts m compliance With the
minImum density for an MDR zone This conceptual plan, and the dISCUSSIOn m thIS wntten
statement, IS a the mtended development proposal for the two proposed parcels
In 2005 there was an earlier SIte plan review applicatIOn submitted for the subject site that
proposed a seven-plex multiple-family development (see DRC2005-0003l) The development
proposal from 2005 IS no longer bemg pursued, as the ongmal plan IS not financially feasible to
construct
All supplemental mformatlOn (I e stormwater scopmg sheet) IS mcluded m the submittal package
along With thiS wntten statement and the tentative partitIOn drawmgs The cntena of approval per
Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) 5 12-125 are addressed below as well
SDC 5.12-125 - Tentative Plan CrIterIa for Approval
(A) The request conforms to the provISIons of thIS Code pertammg to lot/parcel SIze and
dImenSIOns.
The proposed partitIOn complies With all reqUirements of the Spnngfield Development Code
(SDC) pertammg to parcel Size and dimenSIOns as demonstrated below
Parcel Size and Street Frontage
SDC 3 2-215 reqUires that lots or parcels on east-west streets be a mmlmum of 4,500 square feet
m area and have 45 feet of frontage Deadmond Ferry Road IS an east-west street Parcell will
have about 78 feet of frontage on Deadmond Ferry Road and be 6,108 square feet m area Parcel
2 IS proposed as a panhandle lot Per the same code sectIOn reference above, a smgle panhandle
lot must be at 4,500 square feet exclUSive of the panhandle and have 20 feet of frontage Parcel
2, exclUSive of the pole portIOn, Will be 9,076 square feet and have about 44 feet of frontage
Based on these facts, both proposed parcels Will meet the parcel size and dimenSIOn standards of
SDC 32-215
Setbacks
SDC 3 2-215 reqUires a 10 foot setback for front and rear yards ReqUired mtenor yard setbacks
are 5 feet per the same code sectIOn These setback standards Will be evaluated dunng a future
site plan review applicatIOn when a speCific development proposal IS planned Given that the
eXIstlllg structures are proposed for removal, the setbacks to the proposed property lllles WIll not
apply However, If the eXlstlllg Improvements are not removed pnor to final plat approval than a
deed restnctlOn IS proposed as an alternative that will allow the Improvement to remam, but
Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn
January 14, 2008
Page 2
Pm~.;;1 ~:' i\(,:TTi'l rr-("D
H,b 1Jl'i.h~ldr,", I:t..r ~
'both parcels would be reqUired to remam m common ownership until the structures are
removed' JAN 1 <1 Z008
(B) The zomng IS consistent With the Metro Plan diagram and/or appltcable Refinement Plan
diagram, Plan DlstTlct map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
The plan designatIOn for the subject site and adjacent properl1es m the Metro Plan IS medlUm-
density reSidential In addition, the subject property IS zoned MDR (medIUm-density reSIdential)
This zorung deSignatIOn IS consistent With the Metro Plan Land Use Diagram
In addition, the Metro Plan reqUires medIUm-density reSidential developments to be developed
With a mlmmum of 10 and a maximum of 20 umts per acre To demonstrate that It IS feaSible to
develop the proposed parcels With enough umts to meet the denSity reqUirement, a conceptual
site plan IS bemg submitted This IS not an actual development plan The subject site IS about
034 acres m area Below IS a table that shows the mlmmumlmaxlmum number ofumts that
would be reqUired to meet denSity range
Total Site Area 0 34 Acres
DenSity Calculation Units DIVided By Area
4 Units I 0 34 Acres = 12
MInimum Units (4) Units Per Acre
7 Units I 0 34 Acres = 20
MaXimum Units (7) Units Per Acre
The mlmmum number ofumts needed to meet or exceed the mlmmum 10 umt per acre standard
would be four (4) The conceptual sIte plan mcluded With thiS applicatIOn shows that two umts
could be constructed on each parcel for a total of four umts that would proVide a denSity of 12
umts per acre and be consistent Wlth the SDC and Metro Plan
The followmg dIscussIOn IS a review of the dimensIOnal standards (I e setbacks) to demonstrate
that conceptual umts would comply With the SDC and thus be feaSible SDC 3 2-215 reqUires a
10 foot setback for front and rear yards ReqUired mtenor yard setbacks are 5 feet per the same
code sectIOn The closest umt to Deadmond Fel1)' Road on Parcel I would have a front yard
setback of 10 feet and an mtenor yard setback of 5 feet to the property Ime between Parcel I and
2 The umts on Parcel 2 would have mtenor yard setbacks of 10 8 feet and 5 feet, as well as, a
rear yard setback of 10 feet Based on these facts, the proposed umts would comply With the
dImenSIOnal standards Regardmg other standards, SDC 4 6-125 would reqUire a mmlmum of
two (2) parkmg spaces for each duplex umt The conceptual plan shows that there would be 12
parkmg spaces, which would four more spaces than IS reqUired for four umts SDC 4 6-
150(A)(6) allows that bicycle parkmg for multiple-family developments may be proVided m
mdlVldual garages Each ofthe conceptual umts would have a garage that could proVide a secure
area for bicycle storage In additIOn, the conceptual site plan shows that there IS ample area for
the reqUired landscapmg standards to be met Given the mformatlon presented above, It IS
feaSible to develop the subject site With four umts and meet the mlmmum denSity of 10 umts per
acre
(C) Capacity requirements of publtc and private fact/ltles, mcludmg but not Itmlted to, water
and electricity; samtary sewer and stormwater managementfacllttles; and streets and
Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn
January 14, 2008
Page 3
FDC.C[~'I-?\"r~-!'N fJf:r"D
hf. tJv.~ 4;Jn~ ,-t h~...~
traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the publtc Improvements shall gA,ltl'vql~ttI108
to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by thiS Code fInd
other appltcable regulations. The Publzc Works Director or a utility provider shall
determine capacity Issues
The eXIstmg pubhc Improvements and proposed pnvate faclhtles have a very adequate capacity
to accommodate multl-farmly development and a pOSSible four umts m the future based on the
conceptual site plan The facts below and the attached plans demonstrate that the public and
pnvate faCIlities have an adequate capacity to handle the proposed development on thiS site
Wastewater
There IS an eXlstmg 10" wastewater Ime that runs east-west m the Deadmond Ferry Road nght-
of-way There IS an eXlstmg 6" wastewater Ime to stubs to the subject site The proposed plans
prepared by the project engmeer demonstrate that there IS a large enough capacity m these
eXlstmg public Imes to accommodate the type of development anticipated on thiS site
Water
There IS one eXlstmg water meter located adjacent to the development site The eXlstmg 12"
water mam IS located on the north Side of Deadmond Ferry Road The additIOnal water meters
necessary to serve at least four umts are shown on the attached plans The eXlstmg water mam
adjacent to thiS proposed partition IS very adequate to accommodate between 3 and 6 additIOnal
umts that WIll each have mdlvldual water services
Stormwater Dramage
There IS an eXlstmg 21" storm Ime wlthm Deadmond Ferry Road Tlus 21" Ime has pretty of
capacity to handle runoff from between four and seven umts The roof dramage from both
parcels Will be conveyed towards the eXlstmg public system Via a proposed dram pipe (as
mdlcated on the attached storm dramage plan) In addition, the locatIOn of a blO-swale to pre-
treat the ImpervIOUS surface runoff IS shown on the conceptual site plan The project engmeer
has prepared a storm dramage study to demonstrate that the proposed Imes could handle runoff
from certam storm events
Traffic CapaCIty
Per the Institute of TransportatIOn Engmeers (ITE) Tnp GeneratIOn (7th EdItIOn), the average
number of vehicle tnps per day per unit for smgle-family detached housmg IS 9 57 (10%
occumng dunng any peak hour) WhIle the conceptual development plan would be for multiple
umts, the smgle-family trip generatIon number would seem to be the most conservative to
estimate potential tripS from thiS development site The total number of unitS m the conceptual
development plan IS four ThIS means that the average number of dally vehicle tnps for tlus
entire development would be 38 WIth only 4 occurrmg dunng any peak hour ThiS would be a
mmlmal amount of traffic entenng onto Deadmond Ferry Road There IS a mlmmal amount of
additIOnal traffic that could be antiCipated from tlus development site Deadmond Ferry Road IS
paved With curbs/gutters and setback SIdewalks and can very safely accommodate the mlmmal
mcrease m traffic
Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative Partition
January 14,2008
Page 4
["" I't ~;G -Tf'" ~"C'D
rr'i,.bLtJ\ tghtlH~l. l~\~
JM 1 ~ Z008
(D) The proposed land divIsIOn shall comply with all appltcable publtc and private design and
constructIOn standards con tamed m thIS Code and other appltcable
There are no proposed publIc Improvements With thiS land dIVISIOn The applIcant's project
engmeer has carefully prepared the pnvate utilIty plans to ensure that all pnvate design and
constructIOn standards can and will be met In addition, durmg constructIOn all pnvate utilIties
will be mstalled accordmg to all applIcable City standards
(E) PhYSical features, mcluding, but not ltmlted to: steep slopes With unstable sot! or geologiC
conditIOns, areas With susceptiblltty offloodmg; Significant clusters of trees and shrubs;
watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their aSSOCiated riparian areas, wetlands;
rock outcroppmgs, open spaces; and areas of hIStoriC and/or archaeological Significance,
as may be specified m SectIOn 3.3-900 or ORS 97. 740-760,358.905-955 and 390 235-240,
shall be protected as specified m thIS Code or m State or Federal law.
There IS a waterway located to the west of the subject development site The centerlIne of the
waterway/ditch IS shown on the plans The area on the subject property that could be susceptible
to floodmg IS mcluded m an eXIstmg, van able width publIc dramage easement The pubhc
dramage easement IS delmeated on the attached plans No future development will occur wlthm
the easement area to ensure that the area around the creek IS not Impacted and thus protected
There are no other phYSIcal features located on the subject property, mcludmg steep slopes,
slgmficant clusters of trees or shrubs, wetlands, rock outcroppmgs, or hlstonc features By
aVOidance of the dramage easement area, thiS cntenon IS met
(F) Parkmg areas and mgress-egress pomts have been deSigned to' facllttate vehicular traffic,
bicycle and pedestrian safety to aVOid congestIOn; prOVide connectIVIty wlthm the
development area and to adjacent reSidential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity
centers, and commerCial, mdustrlal and public areas, mmlmlze curb cuts on arterial and
collector streets as specified m this Code or other appltcable regulatIOns and comply With
the ODOT access management standards for state highways.
There IS no speCific development plans proposed WIth thiS applIcatIOn, thus the parkmg areas
cannot be fully evaluated for complIance With thiS cntenon Such a review of the parkmg area
will be conducted With a future site plan review apphcatlOn However, the conceptual site plan
shows that a parkmg area could be constructed that would allow easy site circulatIOn for all
vehicles Velucles would be able to back up WIthout backmg mto the nght-of-way Vehicles
also would have qUick and easy access to Deadmond Ferry Road Via a proposed 24 dnveway
(mgress-egress pomt)
The mgress-egress location will be establIshed through tlus partition applIcatIOn There will only
be tlus one mgress-egress pomt to mmlmlze curb cuts From the mgress-egress pomt, velucles
and pedestnans/blCyclIsts will have qUick and safe access to Deadmond Ferry Road Deadmond
Ferry Road proVides street connectIOns With InternatIOnal Way and Game Farm Road Game
Farm Road then connects With Beltlme Highway and Martm Luther Kmg Jr Parkway These
latter two artenals proVide access to the Gateway, Eugene, and the City center of Spnngfield
With easy access to these artenals from Deadmond Ferry Road there IS safe and convement
,
access to nearby reSidential, commerCial, and mdustrlal developments, as well as, transit stops
Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn
January 14,2008
Page 5
eli, rpf'" nl", ~ ~ -"'D
rh~o>J~1:JIt'il ~f/""a~, l;;~l,.
This proposed partitIOn will prOVide good street connectIOns for pedestnans, blcyclist~,A.Ji\.ctl <<! Z008
vehicular traffic
(G) Development of any remamder of the property under the same ownership can be
accomplished m accordance With the prOVISIOns of this Code.
The property owner (Country Manor No 3, LLC) does not own any adjacent land Further, the
entue area of the subject property Will be fully developed as a result of this proposed partition,
thus there will be no remamder that could be further dlVlded later
(H) Adjacent land can be developed or IS prOVided access that Will allow ItS development m
accordance With the provISIons of this Code.
Accordmg to 2004 Aenal Photography from LCOG (Lane Council of Governments), there are
areas around the subject site that are not fully developed All development activity proposed
under tlus applicatIOn or any future site review applicatIOn Will occur on the subject property
Adjacent land can be further developed m accordance With all applicable SDC reqUirements
There Will be no off-SIte Impacts from development on the subject site that would !under adjacent
propertIes from bemg fully developed
(I) When no concurrent annexatIOn applicatIOn IS submitted With a PartitIOn Tentative Plan
on property that IS outSide of the City limits but wlthm the City's urballlzable area, the
standards specified below shall also apply.
(a) The mmlmum area for the partltlOnmg of land m the UF-10 Overlay DIStrict shall be
10 acres
(b) EXCEPTIONS'
1. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future
Development Plan as specified m SectIOn 29.070(I)(c) for ultimate development
With urban densities as reqUired m this Code.
2. In addition to the standards of SubsectIOn (9)(b)l, any proposed new parcel that
IS less than 5 acres shall meet one of the followmg standards:
a. The property to be parlltlOned shall be owned or operated by a governmental
agency or public utility; or
b. A majority of parcels located wlthm 100 feet of the property to be partitIOned
shall be smaller than five acres.
3. No more than three parcels shall be created while the property remams wlthm the
UF-10 Overlay District, unless permitted by SectIOn 34 040(2).
The subject property was annexed mto the City of Spnngfield III 2005, thus thiS cntenon
IS not applicable
(J) Where the SubdiVISIOn of a manufactured dwellmg park or mobile home park IS proposed,
thefollowmg approval criteria apply:
1. The park was approved before July 2, 2001 and IS m compliance With the standards m
SectIOn 3 2-235 or other land use regulatIOns m ejJect at the lime the sUe was approved as
a manufactured dwellmg park or mobile home park, or the park IS an approved non-
conformmg use. In the latter case, a park IS m compliance if the City has not ISsued a
notice of noncompliance on or before July 2,2001.
Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn
January 14,2008
Page 6
j-_,[-I I -j f'"1 - ---'r Ii r~-,
, ~","',J 1Ft ~ ~ r
hb tIt.~","I~~il' l r I , ~ _ ;}
.., I' "'...." tJ
JAN 1 .1 2008
2. The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home
spaces prevIOusly approved or legally exIsting In the park.
3 The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed.
4. The use of lots, as shown on the TentatIve Plan, shall be limIted to the installatIOn of
manufactured dwellings, I.e., "stIck-built" houses are prohIbIted.
5. Any other area In the SubdIVIsion other than the proposed lots shall be used as common
property, unless park streets have prevIOusly been dedIcated to the CIty or there are publIC
utilities In the park. All common property shall be addressed In a Homeowner's
AssociatIOn Agreement.
a. Areas that are usedfor vehIcle cIrculatIOn (streets), drIveways that serve more than
two lots/parcels or common parking areas, shall be shown in a Tract or easement on
the TentatIve Plan
b All other servIces and utIlitIes that serve more than one lot shall be In a Tract or
easement. Where a servIce or utIlity serves only one lot, but crosses another, that
servIce or utility shall also be In an easement shown on the TentatIve Plan.
Springfield Development Code, Chapter 5 Page 56 of 118
c EXIsting buildings In the park usedfor recreatIOnal, meetings or other purposes for
the park resIdents shall be In a Tract shown on the TentatIve Plan
6. Any public utIlities shall be WIthin a public utilIty easement.
7. If public utllmes or servIces are requIred to serve the SubdlVlslOn, the park owner shall
sIgn and execute a waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formatIOn of a local
Improvement dIstrict to provIde the public utIlItIes or servIces.
The subject applicatIOn IS not for a subdiVISIOn of a manufactured dwelling park, thus thiS
cntenon IS not apphcable
If there are any quesl10ns about thiS wntten statement, please do not heSitate to contact me at
Metro Planmng Via emml (robe11(mmetroplann1l1g com) or phone (302-9830) For al! other
questIOns about the proposed partll1on, please contact Scott Moms (project coordmator) at Olson
& Moms
Respectful! y,
Scott Moms, PE
Olson & Moms
(Project Coordmator)
Robert Stevens, AICP
Metro Plannmg
Country Manor No 3, LLC Tental1ve PartitIOn
January 14,2008
Page 7
SENT BY SPRINGFIELD PW,
01/04/2005 16 31 FAX 541 48 253
541 7361021,
OLSON & IIUHRI1>
JAN-5-05 9 25,
\:.[
PAGE 2/3
~UU.1.
,~- "'=' J
PIJBL.1C WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering tJlvision
Phone. (541) 726-3753 FBx (541) 736-1021
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
------- (AT... below III" lmeJiIIt.d OUI by App/kalrJ) -.-
(P1eafe return 10 Mall Slouder@Cltyo/SprmgfieldruMc Works UlgJneumg, FaJI II 7J6-/07.1, Phone # 736-/01:);,
emall fMlOUIiu@jcI.prln11fUld. or u.
PrOject Name: lec.~~.... iK...1 L: . F.....:lr ~ Applicant:
ABsessorsParcel 11-01 -1".0'1. Tl I~OC!o Date:
Land Use(s): Mllll Phone #:
ProJeetSize(Acres): I o. H. 4(, I Fax 1#'
Approx. Impervious Arell. <'. I j ... (, Emsi"
Project DescriptloD (lm:!lude a copy of Assessor's map).
p. 1tG <:o"S~ \''''0 fo..~ "Ie" 'l,~,.t.......i bl4:lrl:""s ~ /:"<-
f",of'tAy
Sc.o~ 1..&:.,4-1.4"",
~- "I~O~.
I O~ . 9 10
-3-:> - J 2.fl
~ clflJ",..~J _""':s. ,,,_
[
DraInage Proposal (pubhc connechon(s), dIscharge locatton(s), etc, Attach additional sheet(s) If necessary'
CD"'I1.eA ~Cl e,,:S\:'" ~....b J- ,~.... y:.. Wet( Aa'''r
1_ ...--.... %!,M.~..' Pnon-.
(Arm b.Jow //Iii 1I,,~ fiUd out bolll#! CUv 11114 Rt!:/u"",d 10 Ihe AtJlllical/Jl
(AI a mmlmUM, all boXt!8 chuklld by the City O1llhefronr and back o/tJn.r .heel shall be .ubm"IM
or an Ircahon 10 be com leJe submll/al, allh h other re ulre/n.rr4 be treee..
DraID31!e Study ]'vpe (EDSPM SectIOn 4.03.2): (Note. VB mav be substituted for RatIOnal Method)
o all Site Study - (uso Rallonal Method for calculations)
o -Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
~ Ful Drainage Development Study - (u.o Unit Hydrograph Method for calculation.)
ICoDs
fil Wellhead Zone
lM WetlandlRiparian
ji:J Sod Type
Jl-~ 't"'...M- r~ ""'M~
Mt"I '( 1.:JM..r- T\) G;.o:, Iii... n;;
:JJ" - M..14~1>J
JM Hlllslde Development
:':.elI FloodwaylFloodplam
~ Other JurlsdictlollB
~;o
yu
.r_ n..J4TlM'\
4!- .,u oft:
Downstream Analvsis:
~
o
o
N/A
Flow line for startmg water surface elevation
Destgn HGL to use for startmg water surface elevation'
Manhole/Junction to take analysis to.
Ratum to Matt Stoudar@ City of Sprlngflald, emall fTlstouderl1licl sorlnaf/ald or us. FAX (541) 736-1021
. NT BY SPRINGFIELD PW,
541 7361 D21 ,
JAM-5-D5 9 25,
PAGE 3/3
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
I ForOfliOlolU..OnIy ~5:
'" Based lJ{1On the l11forma/lOn provuied on the fr0111 of thu sheel, the following represenJs a minimum of what IS needed for an
application 10 be complete for .uhmlttal Wllh respect to drOlnage, h(Jl9ever, this list should not be used In l,eu of the Springfield
D=elopm.nt Code (SI>C) or the CIty'S Engmeenng DesIgn ManuaL Compliance WIth these requirements does not const/rute sUe
approval, Addlhonal SIte specific l1l[ormahon may be required. Note Upon scopmg shea submittal. ensure completedform has been
SIgned '" the space prOVided below
r I,
r"
~J
fi
loterim Design StandardsIW ater Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3)
&q'd N/A JAN 1 " 2008
if 0 All non-bwldmg rooftop (NBR) IIDpeTVlous surfaces sball be pre-treated (c g multl-chmnbcred catchbB9m w70il filtrallon
melha) for stOJIDwater quality Additionally, a rowlmum of 50% of the NBR rrnpervlOUS surface shall be treated by
vegeWed methods
o Where required, vegetal1ve stonnwater deSIgn shall he consIstent wrth mtenm design slandards (EDSPM SectJ.on 3 02), set
forth by the Bu.reau of EnvmmmentaJ SeJ'VIces (BES) or Clean Water SeTVIceS (CWS)
o For new NBR unpervlOus area less than 15,000 square teet, a srrnpltfied des,gn approach may be followed as speclfied by the
BESfOTvege1:attvetreatment -t-'<'.'( ~'(
o If a stormwater treatment swale IS proposed, submtt calculatlonslspeclficatJ.ons far s~ velOflty, flow, S'eU. slopes, botlo11t
slt>pe, and seed llllX consIStent Wlth e,ther BES OT CWS reqwrements - /JAY NP ~ - <I~ oV r....rvc,(
o Water QuaIrty caJculanons as required III SectJ.OII 3 03 t of the EDSPM
o All bwldmg rooftop mOWlled equipment, or other flmd conlJ1inmg equtpment located outsIde of the buIldmg, sba.ll
be proVlded WIth se<:ondary contamment or weather resIStant enclosure
lil
Iil
!fa
General Study Requirements (EDSPM SectIOn 4.03)
I 0 Dramage stUdy prepared by a ProresSlOnaJ Civil Engmeer bcensed III the state of Oregon
D A complete dnunage study, IlII requued m EDSPM Sectlon 4 03 I, mc1udtng a hydrolOgical study map
o Calculattons showmg system capacIty for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-ycar stoml. evenL
o ~ The lime of concentnl1lon (Tc) shall be detenmned uslllg a 10 mmute start 1:Jme for developed baSIIIS
Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Secl10ll 4.03 4 C)
o ~ A downstream drnmage analYSIS as descnbed m EDSPM Section 4 03 4 C On-srte dramage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbmg SpecIalty Code (OPSC).
o @Elevatlons of the HGL and flow Imes for boib city and pnvllU: systems where applicable
Design of Storm System.s (EDSPM Section 4 04)
fiJ 0 Flow Imes, slopes. run elevat.ons, ptpe type and stzeS clellTly mrncated on the plan set
o J4;I Mnumum pipe cover shall be 18 mohes for remfbrced pipe and 36 Inches for plam concrete and plastic pIpe matenals, or
proper engmeenng calculattons shall be proVIded when less 1be cover ,hall be suffiCient to support an 80,000 lb load
without futlure of the pIpe slruCture
~ 0 Mamung's "n" values for pIpes shall be conslstentwrth Table 4--1 of the EDSP All storm PIP.S shall be deSIgned to aclueve
a mmmJum veloClty of three (3) feel per second litO 5 pIpe full based on Table 4-1 eo well
OtherlM.sc
~ 0 Extstmg iDld proposed contOtml, located at one foot interVal Inclnde spot eleVatlons and srte grades showmg bow SIte drams
IaJ D Pnvate stormwater eascmtmlS shall be clearly depIcted on plans when pnvate stormwater flows frum one property to anaiher
o ~ Drywells shall not receIve nmoff frum any surface w/o bemg treated by one or more BMPs, with the exceptlon of reSIdential
hwldmg roofS (EDSP SectJ.on 3 03 4 A) Awlltional proVl&lOOS apply to thts as requll"ed hy the DEQ Refer to the webs1le
www deo state or IL"'wa/l!1'OundwalUlcbome hcm for more mformlll1on
o ~DeWDtJon ponds shall be dcslgned to lim1l nmoffto pre-development rales far the 2 through 25-year storm events
*Thls form s"all b~ lnc/JI.ded ... till attach,.,,,,,t, i1rsld~ ",~ frollt cover, of t1r1! stor",,,,aler $hilly
I 'IMPORTANT. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SlGM
Date /-10- 01'
As the engmccr of record, J hereby ce:rt1fY the above requJred Items arc
complete and mc\uded wlib the subIl!rtled stormwater study and plan set Signature
Form Version 2 Man:h 2004