The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication PLANNER 1/14/2008 (2) . I , PRE-SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION LIST: /- J 5 -()f: Date Distributed: ,/ Dave Puent - Building v Gilbert GordonlMelissa Fechtel- Fire v Gary McKenney - Traffic 2 Matt Stouder- Public Works/Engineering Les Benoy - Public Works/Engineering Dennis Ernst/Jon Driscoll, Surveying Planner, J;t;J~ City of Spnngfield . Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 541-725-3753 Phone 541-726-3689 Fax PRE.SllBMlTI~L REC'D JAN 1 4 200B Pre-Submittal Meeting Case Number Assigned: PRE2008-00006 Date Submitted: 1/14/2008 PrOJect Name' RIVERBEND MANOR PART 255 DEADM PrOject DeSCriptIOn. Pre-Submittal meetmg for tentative Partition for creatIOn of 2 duplex lots ApplIcatIOn Type: PartitIOn Tentative Job Address: 255 DEADMOND FERRY RD Assessor's & Tax Lot #: 1703154001500 DISCLAIMER ApplicatIOns wIll nol be exempl from Developmenl Code or procedural amendments Ihal may occur beiween Ihe tIme of Ihe Pre-SubmIttal Meetmg and SubmIttal of Ihe ApphcallOn for Developmenl ReVIew Please contact our office at 541-726-3753 wllh any quesllOns or concems A Planner will be aSSIgned the followmg busmess day and will contacl you to confirm the meetmg date and !lme PlanJobPrmt rpt 1114/2008 2 36 09PM PRE-SllBMITT6,l REC'D JAN 1 4 200B Pre-Submittal Meeting Development Services Department Room 615/616 PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, January 22,2008 1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2008-00006 (pART TENT) BERRY $336 Assessor's Map: 17-03-15-40 TL 1500 Address: 255 Deadmond Ferry Road Existing Use. ResIdential Applicant submItted plans to partItion one lot into two MDR duplex lots Meeting Dateffime: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 nsn 616 10:00 -11:00 a.m. Planner Steve Hopkins 2. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2008-00004 (SITE TENT) CLEARSPAN TRUSS Assessor's Map. 17-02-31-21 TL800 Address. Commercial Avenue Existing Use: Vacant Applicant submitted plans to construct two new industnal buildings for Clearspan Truss A 12,600 sq ft truss manufacturing plant, 1,500 sq ft office and lumber storage bUIldmg. Meeting Date/Tune Tuesday, January 22, 2008 nsn 616 11:00 - noon Planner. Steve Hopkins City of Spnngfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 PRE.SlIBMlml RECD JAN 1 4 ZOOB Land Division Application, Type II SubdiVISIon Tentative, PartitIOn TentatIve . .- Applicant Name: Company: Address: Countr Manor No 3 LLC 462 S nn dale Ave, S nn field OR 97477 '" "'" ~ , k' 302-9790 485-3253 ,,,,_cdWfPJl1lt& Applicant's Rep.: Company: Address: Pam Clark Olson & Morns 380 Street SUite 200 Phone: Fax: OR 97477 " ~~!'S'0~-_i:"*i;tW~;n",,,,:::,,,,, , I ,"",,%V:::'t~ tyfu,.,.j^'1it:M gjb,,_~' Y-v..4~ Ploperty Owner: Company: Address: Harold & Earlene Ber Countr Manor No 3, LLC 462 S nn dale Ave, S nn field, OR 97477 Phone: 541 968-0317 Fax: A %~ <7,dg);JiWj;(dWf'&Q2_fll =. ^,,,,J_:::_<:<<f'~1L,(S"'! ,,,,, " k" ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-15-4 TAX LOT NO(S): 1500 Property Address: 255 Deadmond Ferr Rd Size of Property: 15,184 Acres 0 Square Feet ~ Proposed Name of Subdivision: \J a. 64__ J A-tA...>>o I~ ~~ ~) ~ _ ___ 4U_~ ~, -, 1 Description of Proposal: To partition 1 tax lot Into 2 duplex lots dujacre . . . , ~ . Zoning: Applicable Refinement Plan: Location: City Limits 0 Associated Applications: ~'?' '\<'''''7~ 'Rf(:l2'L~iUlli'JiV~draM: ~ ~ 1: Pre-Submittal Case No.: (1.1: 7<-\))~ f\Dt\&Date: Case No.: Date: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ TOTAL Overlay District: Plan Designation: Urban Growth Boundary 0 I e-,~ s. I / /4 ( u ~ I Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Posta e Fee: ~ $ \ "!\.Qe;;R-2; l/2 '-/ UC ReVIsed 12/4/2006 Brenda Jones 10' 0J~ ~ 1 -!' ~ '" Pf,~ --zee;'2; - $bCl'6 Steps in the Process: PRE-SlIBMITTAL REC'D JAN 1 4 ZOOB 1. The Applicant Submits a Pre-Submittal Meeting Application The Pre-Submittal Application IS mandatory Please refer to the Spnngfield Fee Schedule for the Pre-Submittal Application fee The submittal package must conform to the application completeness checklist attached to this form You are required to submit 7 copies of the submittal requirements packet for pre-submittal review Pre-submittal meetings will be conducted every Tuesday and Fnday between 10 00 am and noon We will stnve to conduct the Pre-Submittal meeting within five to seven working days of receiving the application 2. Applicant and the City conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting We strongly encourage you, the owner and design team to attend the Pre-Submittal meeting The meeting will be held with representatives from Public Works Englneenng and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning DIvIsion The meeting will be scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes The Planner will provide you with a Pre-Submittal Checklist at the end of the meeting specifying the Items required to make the application complete-If It Isn't already complete You will then have 180 days to make the application complete for submittal and acceptance by the City 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application When you have addressed all of the Items on the Pre-Submittal Checklist, please submit 18 copies of the complete application to the City A fee will be collected at that time and the 120 day calendar review penod will begin When the Planner has prepared a draft land use decIsion, the draft will be mailed/faxed to the applicant/owner/design team for their review At the applicant's request, the planner will schedule a meeting to review the draft with appropnate staff If certain Issues need resolution before the final land use deCISion IS Issued Owner's Signature This application will be used for both the required Pre-Submittal Meeting and subsequent complete application submittal Owner's signatures are required at both stages In the application process An application without the Owner's signature will not be accepted. --:>,sc.'6 - (J;J:DCl::- Date Submitted' The undersigned acknowledges that the information In this application IS correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre-Submittal Meeting Owner ~ 4 lli....... Date. / ~ g'~ Or; Signature ( C::J-- JftPi?ld h, ~J r nt ReVIsed 11/20/2006 Brenda Jones Land Division Submittal Requirements Checklist PRE-SlIBMITTAl REC'D JAN 1 4 ZOOB *If you feel an Item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form 1. Application fee-refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropnate fee calculation formula A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services Department The application fee and current postage fee IS collected at the time of complete application submittal 2. Copy of the deed and a prelimmary title report-one copy Issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances If the applicant IS not the property owner, wntten permission from the property owner IS required 3. One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required nelghbonng property notification packet 4. Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) factllty S. Stormwater Management System Study-four copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached The plan, supporting calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual 6. Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer In accordance with SDC Section 32 020(1)(c) Traffic Impact Studies (TlA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic Impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system In general, a TlA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system In terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and Immediate and adJoining street systems A TlA must also address, If needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and obJectives 7. Seven copies of the following plan sets for the Pre-Submittal Meeting OR Eighteen copies of the following plan sets for Complete Application Submittal All of the following plans must Include the scale (appropriate to the area Involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 3D', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'), north arrow, and date of preparation All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands for submittal a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions [8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer [8J VIcinity Map [8J The name, location and dimensions of all eXisting site features including butldlngs, curb cuts, trees and ImperVIOUS surface areas, clearly Indicating what IS remaining and what IS being removed [8J Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for eXisting structures to remain on site [8J The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and reqUired riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality limited Watercourse Map on file In the Development Services Department ReVIsed 11/20/2006 Brenda Jones PR!: ClH'l' "r'''l'rC'D ..-" IDllil, 1M It!: C8J The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as spec~ h!:rU'Q~test adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map RevIsion C8J The Time of Travel Zones, as specified In Article 17 of the Springfield Development Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file In the Development Services Department C8J PhYSical features Including, but not limited to trees 5" In diameter or greater when measured 4 '/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcrop pings C8J Soil types and water table Information as mapped and specified In the Soils Survey of Lane County A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently If the SOils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable sOils and/or a high water table b. Tentative Land Division Plan C8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor In accordance with ORS 92 C8J Location of all eXisting and proposed easements C8J DimenSions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each bUilding site Indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale C8J Location and type of eXisting and proposed street lighting C8J Location, widths and names of all eXisting and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rlght-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land divIsion C8J Location of eXisting and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and Similar public facilities C8J Location and width of all eXisting and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails C8J Location, size and type of plantlngs and street trees In any required planter strip C8J Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site Including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV Indicate the proposed connection pOints Phased Development Plan required If redlvlslon IS proposed. The plan must Include the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redlvlslon Any redlvlslon must progress In a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public Improvements c. Grading and Paving Plan C8J Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer C8J Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system C8J Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations C8J PervIous and Impervious area drainage patterns C8J The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds, stormwater quality measures, and natural dralnageways to be retained C8J EXisting and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot Intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot Intervals) C8J Amount of proposed cut and fill , Revised] 1/20/2006 Brenda Jones 8. Additional materials that may be required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES OR THE PRE-APPLICATION REPORT AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 31.030: ~ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's ASSOCIation Agreement ~ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster SubdivIsion proposal as specified In SDC Section 16 100(3) ~ Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ~ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently If there are unstable sOils and/or a high water table present ~ Where the development area IS within an overlay district applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district ~ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified In SDC Article 38 ~ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon DIVISion of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there IS a wetland on the property ~ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or eVidence the permit application has been submitted for review ~ Where any grading, filling or excavating IS proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application ~ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of ProvIsions as specified In SDC Article 10 or 11 PR~-SUBMfn4l REC'D JAN 1 4 ZOOB Revised 11/20/2006 Brenda Jones CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP PRE2008-00006 255 Deadmond Ferry Road I I D FERRY RD J ;::=~~ :.":-.~.e-: ~:&;; ~~::,,~....~~ :::=::~~~0-~ ~:.":,,:1~~":. ~~~-....~~~~ ~ f5t;~~":.;-~ SITE Map 17-03-15-40 Tax Lot 1500, North ... PRE sum:I\;r~,l KEC'D JAN lyOOB ~ ~ :111: I :111: :1111 I'~ III III 'll 1II1 ;~ II , "I -- II "I 11- Ilf /-- III 1/1':'1 A I 1"1 I" 1"1 I: :1 III 1''1 I" 1II1 III ~ ~ ~ \, ~ \, REVISIONS, ~ i~!1 ...aIJ+. mUk ~ - alIi- 11111, : :,; II I III ~ --z J ~ .~ IHmllIHIU n~ IljlUmplil . ~ A ~~U i i " I i II i - . DAT" ."... Site Development Plan Olson & PllOJEIT"-.IIn....--, I'f!!\ "-..'-"-~~~ for Morns -- orvini'm." River Bend ManDT ~ ...0$1..... "."11:"""'"" _a_ Consultmg nEv=,,,_ Spnngftetd Lcme Coun.ty ar.g= -'1:101)_ Engmeen; w' EXP""~S '''''''' '''"'CloI'I.....mJ &Sur;eycl'S (fJ J: Gl 8,0 r1 '" ...J OLSON & MloRRllS A divIsion of L BOlson & Associates Inc Consultmg Engineers Land Surveyors Urban Planners 380 Q Street SUite 200 Spnngfleld, Oregon 97477 (541) 302-9790 Fax (541) 485-3253 olsonandmorns com t , J; ~ , . ~\.b. .-\..\.: h t I . ~ - , I)' -"-' TENTATIVE PARTITION APPLICATION FOR COUNTRY MANOR NO 3, LLC JAN 1 4 ZOOB Date January 14, 2008 Property Owner/ApplIcant Country Manor No 3, LLC 2815 Wayside Lane Sprmgfield, OR 97477 ProJ ect Coordmator/ Applicant's Representative Olson & Morns c/o Scott Morns, PE 380 Q Street, SUite 200 Spnngfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9790 Plannmg Metro Plannmg, Inc c/o Robert Stevens, AICP 370 Q Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9830 Assessor's Map/Tax Lot 17-03-15-40/ TL 1500 Area of Request Approximately 14,800 Square Feet EXlstmg ZOlling MDR (MedIUm-Density ReSidential) Number of Parcels Proposed 2 Area of Parcel I 6,108 Square Feet Area of Parcel 2 9,076 Square Feet Backlrround ThIS applicatIOn IS for a tentative partition at 255 Oeadmond Ferry Road wlthm the Spnngfield CIty limits The site was annexed mto the City of Sprmgfield m 2005 ThiS property IS located Wlthm an MDR (medIUm-densIty reSIdential) zone that has a mmlmum density of 10 umts per acre and a maximum of 20 umts per acre per SDC (Spnngfield Development Code) SectIOn 3 2-205 The proposed partition Will create two parcels (one bemg a panhandle lot) out of one eXlstmg lot Country Manor No 3, LLC TentatIve Partition January 14, 2008 Page I PRE-SClSMlmll REeD JAN 1 -t 2008 There are eXlstmg Improvements on the subject property, mcludmg a smgle-farmly house and oversized garage Both of these structures have been removed and will be replaced m the future with multIple-family Ulllts The total number of UnIts wIll comply with the denSIty ranges set by the SDC for an MDR zone With thiS proposed partition plan, the applicant IS submlttmg a conceptual site plan showmg how the development site could be developed m the future With duplex UnIts m compliance With the minImum density for an MDR zone This conceptual plan, and the dISCUSSIOn m thIS wntten statement, IS a the mtended development proposal for the two proposed parcels In 2005 there was an earlier SIte plan review applicatIOn submitted for the subject site that proposed a seven-plex multiple-family development (see DRC2005-0003l) The development proposal from 2005 IS no longer bemg pursued, as the ongmal plan IS not financially feasible to construct All supplemental mformatlOn (I e stormwater scopmg sheet) IS mcluded m the submittal package along With thiS wntten statement and the tentative partitIOn drawmgs The cntena of approval per Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) 5 12-125 are addressed below as well SDC 5.12-125 - Tentative Plan CrIterIa for Approval (A) The request conforms to the provISIons of thIS Code pertammg to lot/parcel SIze and dImenSIOns. The proposed partitIOn complies With all reqUirements of the Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) pertammg to parcel Size and dimenSIOns as demonstrated below Parcel Size and Street Frontage SDC 3 2-215 reqUires that lots or parcels on east-west streets be a mmlmum of 4,500 square feet m area and have 45 feet of frontage Deadmond Ferry Road IS an east-west street Parcell will have about 78 feet of frontage on Deadmond Ferry Road and be 6,108 square feet m area Parcel 2 IS proposed as a panhandle lot Per the same code sectIOn reference above, a smgle panhandle lot must be at 4,500 square feet exclUSive of the panhandle and have 20 feet of frontage Parcel 2, exclUSive of the pole portIOn, Will be 9,076 square feet and have about 44 feet of frontage Based on these facts, both proposed parcels Will meet the parcel size and dimenSIOn standards of SDC 32-215 Setbacks SDC 3 2-215 reqUires a 10 foot setback for front and rear yards ReqUired mtenor yard setbacks are 5 feet per the same code sectIOn These setback standards Will be evaluated dunng a future site plan review applicatIOn when a speCific development proposal IS planned Given that the eXIstlllg structures are proposed for removal, the setbacks to the proposed property lllles WIll not apply However, If the eXlstlllg Improvements are not removed pnor to final plat approval than a deed restnctlOn IS proposed as an alternative that will allow the Improvement to remam, but Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn January 14, 2008 Page 2 Pm~.;;1 ~:' i\(,:TTi'l rr-("D H,b 1Jl'i.h~ldr,", I:t..r ~ 'both parcels would be reqUired to remam m common ownership until the structures are removed' JAN 1 <1 Z008 (B) The zomng IS consistent With the Metro Plan diagram and/or appltcable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan DlstTlct map, and Conceptual Development Plan. The plan designatIOn for the subject site and adjacent properl1es m the Metro Plan IS medlUm- density reSidential In addition, the subject property IS zoned MDR (medIUm-density reSIdential) This zorung deSignatIOn IS consistent With the Metro Plan Land Use Diagram In addition, the Metro Plan reqUires medIUm-density reSidential developments to be developed With a mlmmum of 10 and a maximum of 20 umts per acre To demonstrate that It IS feaSible to develop the proposed parcels With enough umts to meet the denSity reqUirement, a conceptual site plan IS bemg submitted This IS not an actual development plan The subject site IS about 034 acres m area Below IS a table that shows the mlmmumlmaxlmum number ofumts that would be reqUired to meet denSity range Total Site Area 0 34 Acres DenSity Calculation Units DIVided By Area 4 Units I 0 34 Acres = 12 MInimum Units (4) Units Per Acre 7 Units I 0 34 Acres = 20 MaXimum Units (7) Units Per Acre The mlmmum number ofumts needed to meet or exceed the mlmmum 10 umt per acre standard would be four (4) The conceptual sIte plan mcluded With thiS applicatIOn shows that two umts could be constructed on each parcel for a total of four umts that would proVide a denSity of 12 umts per acre and be consistent Wlth the SDC and Metro Plan The followmg dIscussIOn IS a review of the dimensIOnal standards (I e setbacks) to demonstrate that conceptual umts would comply With the SDC and thus be feaSible SDC 3 2-215 reqUires a 10 foot setback for front and rear yards ReqUired mtenor yard setbacks are 5 feet per the same code sectIOn The closest umt to Deadmond Fel1)' Road on Parcel I would have a front yard setback of 10 feet and an mtenor yard setback of 5 feet to the property Ime between Parcel I and 2 The umts on Parcel 2 would have mtenor yard setbacks of 10 8 feet and 5 feet, as well as, a rear yard setback of 10 feet Based on these facts, the proposed umts would comply With the dImenSIOnal standards Regardmg other standards, SDC 4 6-125 would reqUire a mmlmum of two (2) parkmg spaces for each duplex umt The conceptual plan shows that there would be 12 parkmg spaces, which would four more spaces than IS reqUired for four umts SDC 4 6- 150(A)(6) allows that bicycle parkmg for multiple-family developments may be proVided m mdlVldual garages Each ofthe conceptual umts would have a garage that could proVide a secure area for bicycle storage In additIOn, the conceptual site plan shows that there IS ample area for the reqUired landscapmg standards to be met Given the mformatlon presented above, It IS feaSible to develop the subject site With four umts and meet the mlmmum denSity of 10 umts per acre (C) Capacity requirements of publtc and private fact/ltles, mcludmg but not Itmlted to, water and electricity; samtary sewer and stormwater managementfacllttles; and streets and Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn January 14, 2008 Page 3 FDC.C[~'I-?\"r~-!'N fJf:r"D hf. tJv.~ 4;Jn~ ,-t h~...~ traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the publtc Improvements shall gA,ltl'vql~ttI108 to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by thiS Code fInd other appltcable regulations. The Publzc Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity Issues The eXIstmg pubhc Improvements and proposed pnvate faclhtles have a very adequate capacity to accommodate multl-farmly development and a pOSSible four umts m the future based on the conceptual site plan The facts below and the attached plans demonstrate that the public and pnvate faCIlities have an adequate capacity to handle the proposed development on thiS site Wastewater There IS an eXlstmg 10" wastewater Ime that runs east-west m the Deadmond Ferry Road nght- of-way There IS an eXlstmg 6" wastewater Ime to stubs to the subject site The proposed plans prepared by the project engmeer demonstrate that there IS a large enough capacity m these eXlstmg public Imes to accommodate the type of development anticipated on thiS site Water There IS one eXlstmg water meter located adjacent to the development site The eXlstmg 12" water mam IS located on the north Side of Deadmond Ferry Road The additIOnal water meters necessary to serve at least four umts are shown on the attached plans The eXlstmg water mam adjacent to thiS proposed partition IS very adequate to accommodate between 3 and 6 additIOnal umts that WIll each have mdlvldual water services Stormwater Dramage There IS an eXlstmg 21" storm Ime wlthm Deadmond Ferry Road Tlus 21" Ime has pretty of capacity to handle runoff from between four and seven umts The roof dramage from both parcels Will be conveyed towards the eXlstmg public system Via a proposed dram pipe (as mdlcated on the attached storm dramage plan) In addition, the locatIOn of a blO-swale to pre- treat the ImpervIOUS surface runoff IS shown on the conceptual site plan The project engmeer has prepared a storm dramage study to demonstrate that the proposed Imes could handle runoff from certam storm events Traffic CapaCIty Per the Institute of TransportatIOn Engmeers (ITE) Tnp GeneratIOn (7th EdItIOn), the average number of vehicle tnps per day per unit for smgle-family detached housmg IS 9 57 (10% occumng dunng any peak hour) WhIle the conceptual development plan would be for multiple umts, the smgle-family trip generatIon number would seem to be the most conservative to estimate potential tripS from thiS development site The total number of unitS m the conceptual development plan IS four ThIS means that the average number of dally vehicle tnps for tlus entire development would be 38 WIth only 4 occurrmg dunng any peak hour ThiS would be a mmlmal amount of traffic entenng onto Deadmond Ferry Road There IS a mlmmal amount of additIOnal traffic that could be antiCipated from tlus development site Deadmond Ferry Road IS paved With curbs/gutters and setback SIdewalks and can very safely accommodate the mlmmal mcrease m traffic Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative Partition January 14,2008 Page 4 ["" I't ~;G -Tf'" ~"C'D rr'i,.bLtJ\ tghtlH~l. l~\~ JM 1 ~ Z008 (D) The proposed land divIsIOn shall comply with all appltcable publtc and private design and constructIOn standards con tamed m thIS Code and other appltcable There are no proposed publIc Improvements With thiS land dIVISIOn The applIcant's project engmeer has carefully prepared the pnvate utilIty plans to ensure that all pnvate design and constructIOn standards can and will be met In addition, durmg constructIOn all pnvate utilIties will be mstalled accordmg to all applIcable City standards (E) PhYSical features, mcluding, but not ltmlted to: steep slopes With unstable sot! or geologiC conditIOns, areas With susceptiblltty offloodmg; Significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their aSSOCiated riparian areas, wetlands; rock outcroppmgs, open spaces; and areas of hIStoriC and/or archaeological Significance, as may be specified m SectIOn 3.3-900 or ORS 97. 740-760,358.905-955 and 390 235-240, shall be protected as specified m thIS Code or m State or Federal law. There IS a waterway located to the west of the subject development site The centerlIne of the waterway/ditch IS shown on the plans The area on the subject property that could be susceptible to floodmg IS mcluded m an eXIstmg, van able width publIc dramage easement The pubhc dramage easement IS delmeated on the attached plans No future development will occur wlthm the easement area to ensure that the area around the creek IS not Impacted and thus protected There are no other phYSIcal features located on the subject property, mcludmg steep slopes, slgmficant clusters of trees or shrubs, wetlands, rock outcroppmgs, or hlstonc features By aVOidance of the dramage easement area, thiS cntenon IS met (F) Parkmg areas and mgress-egress pomts have been deSigned to' facllttate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to aVOid congestIOn; prOVide connectIVIty wlthm the development area and to adjacent reSidential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commerCial, mdustrlal and public areas, mmlmlze curb cuts on arterial and collector streets as specified m this Code or other appltcable regulatIOns and comply With the ODOT access management standards for state highways. There IS no speCific development plans proposed WIth thiS applIcatIOn, thus the parkmg areas cannot be fully evaluated for complIance With thiS cntenon Such a review of the parkmg area will be conducted With a future site plan review apphcatlOn However, the conceptual site plan shows that a parkmg area could be constructed that would allow easy site circulatIOn for all vehicles Velucles would be able to back up WIthout backmg mto the nght-of-way Vehicles also would have qUick and easy access to Deadmond Ferry Road Via a proposed 24 dnveway (mgress-egress pomt) The mgress-egress location will be establIshed through tlus partition applIcatIOn There will only be tlus one mgress-egress pomt to mmlmlze curb cuts From the mgress-egress pomt, velucles and pedestnans/blCyclIsts will have qUick and safe access to Deadmond Ferry Road Deadmond Ferry Road proVides street connectIOns With InternatIOnal Way and Game Farm Road Game Farm Road then connects With Beltlme Highway and Martm Luther Kmg Jr Parkway These latter two artenals proVide access to the Gateway, Eugene, and the City center of Spnngfield With easy access to these artenals from Deadmond Ferry Road there IS safe and convement , access to nearby reSidential, commerCial, and mdustrlal developments, as well as, transit stops Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn January 14,2008 Page 5 eli, rpf'" nl", ~ ~ -"'D rh~o>J~1:JIt'il ~f/""a~, l;;~l,. This proposed partitIOn will prOVide good street connectIOns for pedestnans, blcyclist~,A.Ji\.ctl <<! Z008 vehicular traffic (G) Development of any remamder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished m accordance With the prOVISIOns of this Code. The property owner (Country Manor No 3, LLC) does not own any adjacent land Further, the entue area of the subject property Will be fully developed as a result of this proposed partition, thus there will be no remamder that could be further dlVlded later (H) Adjacent land can be developed or IS prOVided access that Will allow ItS development m accordance With the provISIons of this Code. Accordmg to 2004 Aenal Photography from LCOG (Lane Council of Governments), there are areas around the subject site that are not fully developed All development activity proposed under tlus applicatIOn or any future site review applicatIOn Will occur on the subject property Adjacent land can be further developed m accordance With all applicable SDC reqUirements There Will be no off-SIte Impacts from development on the subject site that would !under adjacent propertIes from bemg fully developed (I) When no concurrent annexatIOn applicatIOn IS submitted With a PartitIOn Tentative Plan on property that IS outSide of the City limits but wlthm the City's urballlzable area, the standards specified below shall also apply. (a) The mmlmum area for the partltlOnmg of land m the UF-10 Overlay DIStrict shall be 10 acres (b) EXCEPTIONS' 1. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future Development Plan as specified m SectIOn 29.070(I)(c) for ultimate development With urban densities as reqUired m this Code. 2. In addition to the standards of SubsectIOn (9)(b)l, any proposed new parcel that IS less than 5 acres shall meet one of the followmg standards: a. The property to be parlltlOned shall be owned or operated by a governmental agency or public utility; or b. A majority of parcels located wlthm 100 feet of the property to be partitIOned shall be smaller than five acres. 3. No more than three parcels shall be created while the property remams wlthm the UF-10 Overlay District, unless permitted by SectIOn 34 040(2). The subject property was annexed mto the City of Spnngfield III 2005, thus thiS cntenon IS not applicable (J) Where the SubdiVISIOn of a manufactured dwellmg park or mobile home park IS proposed, thefollowmg approval criteria apply: 1. The park was approved before July 2, 2001 and IS m compliance With the standards m SectIOn 3 2-235 or other land use regulatIOns m ejJect at the lime the sUe was approved as a manufactured dwellmg park or mobile home park, or the park IS an approved non- conformmg use. In the latter case, a park IS m compliance if the City has not ISsued a notice of noncompliance on or before July 2,2001. Country Manor No 3, LLC Tentative PartitIOn January 14,2008 Page 6 j-_,[-I I -j f'"1 - ---'r Ii r~-, , ~","',J 1Ft ~ ~ r hb tIt.~","I~~il' l r I , ~ _ ;} .., I' "'...." tJ JAN 1 .1 2008 2. The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home spaces prevIOusly approved or legally exIsting In the park. 3 The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed. 4. The use of lots, as shown on the TentatIve Plan, shall be limIted to the installatIOn of manufactured dwellings, I.e., "stIck-built" houses are prohIbIted. 5. Any other area In the SubdIVIsion other than the proposed lots shall be used as common property, unless park streets have prevIOusly been dedIcated to the CIty or there are publIC utilities In the park. All common property shall be addressed In a Homeowner's AssociatIOn Agreement. a. Areas that are usedfor vehIcle cIrculatIOn (streets), drIveways that serve more than two lots/parcels or common parking areas, shall be shown in a Tract or easement on the TentatIve Plan b All other servIces and utIlitIes that serve more than one lot shall be In a Tract or easement. Where a servIce or utIlity serves only one lot, but crosses another, that servIce or utility shall also be In an easement shown on the TentatIve Plan. Springfield Development Code, Chapter 5 Page 56 of 118 c EXIsting buildings In the park usedfor recreatIOnal, meetings or other purposes for the park resIdents shall be In a Tract shown on the TentatIve Plan 6. Any public utIlities shall be WIthin a public utilIty easement. 7. If public utllmes or servIces are requIred to serve the SubdlVlslOn, the park owner shall sIgn and execute a waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formatIOn of a local Improvement dIstrict to provIde the public utIlItIes or servIces. The subject applicatIOn IS not for a subdiVISIOn of a manufactured dwelling park, thus thiS cntenon IS not apphcable If there are any quesl10ns about thiS wntten statement, please do not heSitate to contact me at Metro Planmng Via emml (robe11(mmetroplann1l1g com) or phone (302-9830) For al! other questIOns about the proposed partll1on, please contact Scott Moms (project coordmator) at Olson & Moms Respectful! y, Scott Moms, PE Olson & Moms (Project Coordmator) Robert Stevens, AICP Metro Plannmg Country Manor No 3, LLC Tental1ve PartitIOn January 14,2008 Page 7 SENT BY SPRINGFIELD PW, 01/04/2005 16 31 FAX 541 48 253 541 7361021, OLSON & IIUHRI1> JAN-5-05 9 25, \:.[ PAGE 2/3 ~UU.1. ,~- "'=' J PIJBL.1C WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering tJlvision Phone. (541) 726-3753 FBx (541) 736-1021 STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ------- (AT... below III" lmeJiIIt.d OUI by App/kalrJ) -.- (P1eafe return 10 Mall Slouder@Cltyo/SprmgfieldruMc Works UlgJneumg, FaJI II 7J6-/07.1, Phone # 736-/01:);, emall fMlOUIiu@jcI.prln11fUld. or u. PrOject Name: lec.~~.... iK...1 L: . F.....:lr ~ Applicant: ABsessorsParcel 11-01 -1".0'1. Tl I~OC!o Date: Land Use(s): Mllll Phone #: ProJeetSize(Acres): I o. H. 4(, I Fax 1#' Approx. Impervious Arell. <'. I j ... (, Emsi" Project DescriptloD (lm:!lude a copy of Assessor's map). p. 1tG <:o"S~ \''''0 fo..~ "Ie" 'l,~,.t.......i bl4:lrl:""s ~ /:"<- f",of'tAy Sc.o~ 1..&:.,4-1.4"", ~- "I~O~. I O~ . 9 10 -3-:> - J 2.fl ~ clflJ",..~J _""':s. ,,,_ [ DraInage Proposal (pubhc connechon(s), dIscharge locatton(s), etc, Attach additional sheet(s) If necessary' CD"'I1.eA ~Cl e,,:S\:'" ~....b J- ,~.... y:.. Wet( Aa'''r 1_ ...--.... %!,M.~..' Pnon-. (Arm b.Jow //Iii 1I,,~ fiUd out bolll#! CUv 11114 Rt!:/u"",d 10 Ihe AtJlllical/Jl (AI a mmlmUM, all boXt!8 chuklld by the City O1llhefronr and back o/tJn.r .heel shall be .ubm"IM or an Ircahon 10 be com leJe submll/al, allh h other re ulre/n.rr4 be treee.. DraID31!e Study ]'vpe (EDSPM SectIOn 4.03.2): (Note. VB mav be substituted for RatIOnal Method) o all Site Study - (uso Rallonal Method for calculations) o -Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ~ Ful Drainage Development Study - (u.o Unit Hydrograph Method for calculation.) ICoDs fil Wellhead Zone lM WetlandlRiparian ji:J Sod Type Jl-~ 't"'...M- r~ ""'M~ Mt"I '( 1.:JM..r- T\) G;.o:, Iii... n;; :JJ" - M..14~1>J JM Hlllslde Development :':.elI FloodwaylFloodplam ~ Other JurlsdictlollB ~;o yu .r_ n..J4TlM'\ 4!- .,u oft: Downstream Analvsis: ~ o o N/A Flow line for startmg water surface elevation Destgn HGL to use for startmg water surface elevation' Manhole/Junction to take analysis to. Ratum to Matt Stoudar@ City of Sprlngflald, emall fTlstouderl1licl sorlnaf/ald or us. FAX (541) 736-1021 . NT BY SPRINGFIELD PW, 541 7361 D21 , JAM-5-D5 9 25, PAGE 3/3 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I ForOfliOlolU..OnIy ~5: '" Based lJ{1On the l11forma/lOn provuied on the fr0111 of thu sheel, the following represenJs a minimum of what IS needed for an application 10 be complete for .uhmlttal Wllh respect to drOlnage, h(Jl9ever, this list should not be used In l,eu of the Springfield D=elopm.nt Code (SI>C) or the CIty'S Engmeenng DesIgn ManuaL Compliance WIth these requirements does not const/rute sUe approval, Addlhonal SIte specific l1l[ormahon may be required. Note Upon scopmg shea submittal. ensure completedform has been SIgned '" the space prOVided below r I, r" ~J fi loterim Design StandardsIW ater Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) &q'd N/A JAN 1 " 2008 if 0 All non-bwldmg rooftop (NBR) IIDpeTVlous surfaces sball be pre-treated (c g multl-chmnbcred catchbB9m w70il filtrallon melha) for stOJIDwater quality Additionally, a rowlmum of 50% of the NBR rrnpervlOUS surface shall be treated by vegeWed methods o Where required, vegetal1ve stonnwater deSIgn shall he consIstent wrth mtenm design slandards (EDSPM SectJ.on 3 02), set forth by the Bu.reau of EnvmmmentaJ SeJ'VIces (BES) or Clean Water SeTVIceS (CWS) o For new NBR unpervlOus area less than 15,000 square teet, a srrnpltfied des,gn approach may be followed as speclfied by the BESfOTvege1:attvetreatment -t-'<'.'( ~'( o If a stormwater treatment swale IS proposed, submtt calculatlonslspeclficatJ.ons far s~ velOflty, flow, S'eU. slopes, botlo11t slt>pe, and seed llllX consIStent Wlth e,ther BES OT CWS reqwrements - /JAY NP ~ - <I~ oV r....rvc,( o Water QuaIrty caJculanons as required III SectJ.OII 3 03 t of the EDSPM o All bwldmg rooftop mOWlled equipment, or other flmd conlJ1inmg equtpment located outsIde of the buIldmg, sba.ll be proVlded WIth se<:ondary contamment or weather resIStant enclosure lil Iil !fa General Study Requirements (EDSPM SectIOn 4.03) I 0 Dramage stUdy prepared by a ProresSlOnaJ Civil Engmeer bcensed III the state of Oregon D A complete dnunage study, IlII requued m EDSPM Sectlon 4 03 I, mc1udtng a hydrolOgical study map o Calculattons showmg system capacIty for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-ycar stoml. evenL o ~ The lime of concentnl1lon (Tc) shall be detenmned uslllg a 10 mmute start 1:Jme for developed baSIIIS Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Secl10ll 4.03 4 C) o ~ A downstream drnmage analYSIS as descnbed m EDSPM Section 4 03 4 C On-srte dramage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbmg SpecIalty Code (OPSC). o @Elevatlons of the HGL and flow Imes for boib city and pnvllU: systems where applicable Design of Storm System.s (EDSPM Section 4 04) fiJ 0 Flow Imes, slopes. run elevat.ons, ptpe type and stzeS clellTly mrncated on the plan set o J4;I Mnumum pipe cover shall be 18 mohes for remfbrced pipe and 36 Inches for plam concrete and plastic pIpe matenals, or proper engmeenng calculattons shall be proVIded when less 1be cover ,hall be suffiCient to support an 80,000 lb load without futlure of the pIpe slruCture ~ 0 Mamung's "n" values for pIpes shall be conslstentwrth Table 4--1 of the EDSP All storm PIP.S shall be deSIgned to aclueve a mmmJum veloClty of three (3) feel per second litO 5 pIpe full based on Table 4-1 eo well OtherlM.sc ~ 0 Extstmg iDld proposed contOtml, located at one foot interVal Inclnde spot eleVatlons and srte grades showmg bow SIte drams IaJ D Pnvate stormwater eascmtmlS shall be clearly depIcted on plans when pnvate stormwater flows frum one property to anaiher o ~ Drywells shall not receIve nmoff frum any surface w/o bemg treated by one or more BMPs, with the exceptlon of reSIdential hwldmg roofS (EDSP SectJ.on 3 03 4 A) Awlltional proVl&lOOS apply to thts as requll"ed hy the DEQ Refer to the webs1le www deo state or IL"'wa/l!1'OundwalUlcbome hcm for more mformlll1on o ~DeWDtJon ponds shall be dcslgned to lim1l nmoffto pre-development rales far the 2 through 25-year storm events *Thls form s"all b~ lnc/JI.ded ... till attach,.,,,,,t, i1rsld~ ",~ frollt cover, of t1r1! stor",,,,aler $hilly I 'IMPORTANT. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SlGM Date /-10- 01' As the engmccr of record, J hereby ce:rt1fY the above requJred Items arc complete and mc\uded wlib the subIl!rtled stormwater study and plan set Signature Form Version 2 Man:h 2004