HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 2/4/2008
,<
~
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD - DEVE'
lENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DISTRIBUTION DATE February 4,2008
TO
,/
...L
..L
~
~
~
}
--;:7'
~
~
~
"7'
7'
~
i:7'
v
~
.........-
~
7'
..K
.....--
l7
Date Received
Current Planning Staff G Karp, J Donovan, LIz Mill er Klttl Gale,
L Pauly, Tara Jones, Andy Limblrd, Dave Reesor Steve Hopkins ally Markanan FEB _ 4 2008
'Matt Stouder, Englneenng - Public Works Departmen
'Les Benoy, Engineer Group, En9lneenng/Publlc Works
'Chuck Gottfned, EnVIronmental Services
Bnan Barnett, Traffic EnglneerlPE, Public Works Department (agenda only 2/02) Ongmal SubmIttal
'Gal)' McKenney, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Departmenl
'Gilbert Gordon, Depuly Fire Marshall, Fire & Life Safely Department
Melissa Fechtel, Fire Agenda only
'Pat French, Planner, Wlllamalane Park and Recreation Dlstnct
'Tamara Johnson, Spnngfield Utlllly Board (Electnc)
'Bart McKee, Spnngfield Uti Illy Board (Water)
Jack Foster, Spnngfield Ulll1ly Board (Energy Conservation)
Amy Chlnltz, Spnngfield Utlllly Board (Dnnklng Water)
Jim Henl)', Central Lane Communications 911 (SubdiVISions, Street name changes)
Dave Whrte, U S P S (Growth Mgmt Coordinator)
Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas (needs full packets for Partlbons/Subdlvlslons)
'Cella Barry, Lane Counly Transportation
Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald People's Ulll1ly Dlstnct (EPUD)
Jim Mann, Lane Counly Land Management [Urban Transition Zone]
George Ehlers, Lane Counly Sanltanan [Urban Transrtlon Zone] (If applicable)
Tim Hanely, Rainbow Water Dlstnct(' only If In the North Spfld area) (If applicable)
Ralph Johnston, Lane Regional Air Pollution Authonly (If applicable)
Dale Ledyard, Operations Chief, McKenZie Fire Dlstnct (If applicable)
Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable (If applicable)
Debbie Crampton, EWEB (electnc) ('If In Glenwood)
Dick HelgesoniMel Damewood, EWEB (water) ('If In Glenwood)
Steve Mae, Glenwood Water Dlstnct ('If In Glenwood)
Bill Gnle - Development Services Director (agenda)
John Tamulonls, EconomiC & Communlly Development Manager (agenda)
Cindie Matt, Code Enforcement Inspector (agenda)
'Dave Puent, BUilding OffiCial (agenda)
Lisa Hopper, BUilding Services Representative (agenda)
, Greg Ferschweller, Keith Mlyata, Bnan Conlon, Gene Butterfield, PW Dept (agenda)
'Craig Frtzgerald, Maintenance PW Dept
George Walker, EnVIronmental Works Dept , (agenda only)
Deanna Buckem, Englneenng ASSistant, Public Works Dept (agenda)
Police Chief, Jerry Smith, Police Department (agenda)
*WIll Mueller, L TD
Nann Palmer, Quest Corporation (agenda
Mike Wilbur, ODOT, State Highway D,v,s,on (agenda)
Steve Barrett, Asst Supenn of Operations, Spnngfield School Dlstnct (agenda)
William LeWIS, Financial Services, Spnngfield School District ( agenda)
Jack Moran, Reporter, Eugene Register-Guard (agenda) INCLUDE WEEKLY LAND USE INFO
Spnngfield Beacon (agenda)
Joe Leahy, Clly Attomey
DenniS Emst, Clly Surveyor
Carole Knapel, PEACEHEALTH/JUSTICE CENTER/FIRE STATION ITEMS
A request for land use action, as deSCribed on the attached agenda, has been received by the Development Services
Office SpeCIfic concerns of your dlvlslonidepartmenVagency should be addressed If you have comments or
requlremenls of thiS proposal, please send them In wnllng to the assigned planner @ Development Services
Department, 225 Fifth Street, Spnngfield, OR 97477
If your wntten comments are not received by Fnday, February 15, 2008 speCific concerns of your
dlvlslon/departmenVagency Will not be addressed unless you attend the meeting on February 19, 2008 The
Development ReView Committee holds staff review meellngs on Tuesday @ 800 -10 00 a m You should also plan to
attend the staff meeting on Tuesday If you have speCific concerns so that the Planning representative can diSCUSS them
pnor to meeting With the applicant If the Planner feels It IS necessal)' for you to participate In the public meetings
helshe will let you know on Tuesday
, Will receive a full packet
Date ReceIved
FES - 4 2008
AGE N D A Orlgmal Submittal
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Conference Room 615
Staff ReVIew. February 19, 2008 @ 8 00 - 9.00 a.m
1 PARTITION TENTATIVE #SUB2008-00005 BERRY 8 - 9 a m
Assessor's Map 17-03-15-40 TL 1500
Address 255 Deadmond Ferry Road
EXlsling Use Residential
Applicant submitted plans to partition one lot mto two duplex lots
,
Planner Steve Hopkms
2 SITE PLAN TENTATIVE #DRC2008-00008 IRISH GLEN/HAMMERlARAMARK 9-10 a.m
Assessor's Map 17-02-30-44 TL 100, 200
Address 1230 40'h Street & Vacant lot
EXisting Use Vacant
Applicant submitted plans to construct a 25,000 square foot office/Industrial bUilding as the Aramark
Dlstnbutlon Center
Planner Steve Hopkins
1
JAN 2 8 2008
City 0 f S:Jnngfield
Devel opnent Services Department
225 F jft~ Street
SpnngfHld, OR 97477
Land I>ivision Tentative Plan
PartItion, SubdivIsion
Date Received
Onglnal submittal
FES - 4 2008
A hcant Name: Harold & Earlene Berr
Phone: 541 968-0317
Com an :
Address:
Countr Manor No 3, LLC
462 S nn dale Ave, S nn field, OR 97477
j,~ , j , ~~ ,
Fax:
" '\I ~~~" h
A hcant's Re .. Pam Clark
Phone: 541 302-9790
Com an :
Olson & Morns
Fax:
485-3253
Address:
Y., ,"-'
380 Street, SUite 200, S nn field, OR 97477
~~~~i ~~j ~ "" ~J \x
, M Id"
Countr Manor No 3, LLC
Phone:
Fax:
\ ""'~ ~
462 S nn dale Ave, S nn field, OR 97477
"'" ~ lJ.q 1 I~ 'It ~ "
~ -~ f' \
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-15-4
255 Deadmond Fer Rd
15 184
Acres 0 S uare Feet [8J
Pro osed Name of Subdivision:
M9 ~\ "
Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application
Pro osal:
EXlstin Use:
. -. -...
Associated A hcations:
~~:/o08 -0000 (p
SI ns:
Pre-Sub Case No.:
D09 -oc:ocls. Date:
Reviewed b
Case No.: ~vi@ '-OO~;O'S
A !lcatlon Fee: $ L( 1--:3"1
,
TOTAL FEES: $ S I '1--0 ,lIS
~""" Ll _Wi"fi'f.J}.K 4 .,,';;,.+fiw &
Date: J' o'Y::>
Technical Fee: $~j, (..
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan
1 of 10
Date ReceIved
/'
FEB - 4 2008
1-
'\
Onglnal submittal
1-
'\
1-
\.
~ ;::: .,... ....,..,. ,..,.. -
,"BllliifB:li;!lllllillll,'III"III'111
" ;DGI.'illl~~I;'II'IIGI. II 1'1
1;;I"Ii;I:i..i~li<1 i~ ;.i 'I!~I!
!i~~I!:i:!i!!lil:!I~ :i :11 :!lle:~'
; lil!iU Uu i!~i!: II nlHI!' ~
. m '111 il&~II:. II I~! ·
{J) i RIO:VrSIONS
J:'
-.J2,QtTJ
t'1
-1'
OAm ...._
..0JttT~ JIlU.....--
JAN 2 8 2008
I \
..o~rll al Submittal
I I~
I I Iii,
I I ::1 --
"I
I I I I,
I I : ~ ~--
!till
A I
1-
"\
III'
, ,
1111
I
. ~ . :rIll,
.... G.!..~+.~i"..
1'111
1'111
11111111111111
1.llllllIIllllil
lUll I I
t III
.
.
~ -7!:r
. (
,
""VIE>'"".y_
""v",."".,_
;~:'LIm>.'_
Tentative Partition Plan
for
Rwer Bend. No.nor
~'" LMMC_ """"'
[ == 1; Olson&
J Moms
I ~ I .......
,~... ...........""" Comulung
__.,...,,,,,:!:::= Ehglneelll
&Sll1Veyws
><~Ll:._K~
Date Rece",ed
FEB - ~ 2008
Orlgloal subm1ttal-
~
Date ReceIved;
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
SUB2008-00005
255 Deadmond Ferry Road
JAN 2 8 2008
Onglnal SubmIttal
I I
D FERRY RD
SITE
Map 17-03-15-40
Tax Lot 1500,
North
...
Date Received
FEB - 4 2008
Date Received
Onglnal Submittal
TENTATIVE PARTITION APPLICATION FOR
RIVER BEND MANOR
JAN 2 8 2008
OnglOal Submittal
Date
January 24, 2008
lAND USE PlANNING AND CONSUlTlNG SERVlUS
370 Q STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
15411 3029830
FAX 1(541161 (} 1805
Property Owner/ApplIcant
Country Manor No 3, LLC
2815 Wayside Lane
Spnngfield, OR 97477
Project CoOrdlnatDr/
ApplIcant's Representative
Olson & Morns
c/o Pam Clark
380 Q Street, SUite 200
Spnngfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302-9790
Plannmg
Metro Plannmg, Inc
c/o Robert Stevens, AlCP
370 Q Street
Spnngfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302-9830
Assessor's Map/Tax Lot
17-03-15-40/TL 1500
Area of Request
15,190 Square Feet
EXlstmg Zomng
MDR (MedIUm-DensIty Residential)
Number of Parcels Proposed
2
Area of Parcel I
6,108 Square Feet
Area of Parcel 2
9,076 Square Feet
Back2round
This applIcatiOn IS for a tentative partitiOn at 255 Deadmond Ferry Road within
the Spnngfield City lImIts The site was annexed Into the CIty of Springfield In
2005 ThIs property IS located wIthin an MDR (medIum-densIty resIdentIal) zone
that has a mlOlmum denSity of 10 umts per acre and a maximum of20 uOlts per
acre per SDC (Spnngfield Development Code) SectiOn 3 2-205 The proposed
partitiOn Will create two parcels (one being a panhandle lot) out of one eXIsting
lot There are no eXisting Improvements on the subject property
Rtver Bend Manor Tentative PartitiOn
January 24,2008
Page I
Date ReceIVed
FEB - 4 2006
~ _ anginal Submittal
Ongln'9l181.l!Pm1~~ posed partitIOn plan, the apphcant IS subm[ttmg a conceptual site plan (mcluded m
the plan set) showmg how the development sltel could be developed m the future with multlple-
faImly uOlts m comphance with the mlOlmum and maxImum density for an MDR zone This
I
conceptual plan, and the discussIOn m this wnttfn statement, IS not a formal development
proposal for the two proposed parcels The actual development plan wIll be subm1tted m a
subsequent bUlldmg permit apphcatlOn
~
Date Received
JAN 2 8 2008
In 2005 there was an earher site plan review apphcatlOn submitted for the subject site that
proposed a seven-plex mu\tlple-farmly development (see DRC2005-00031) That site reVIew
I
applicatIOn development proposal IS no longer bemg planned This partitIOn represents a change
m the plans for the property
All supplemental mformatlOn (I e stormwater scopmg sheet) IS mcluded m the submIttal package
I
along Wlth thiS wntten statement and the tentatIVe partitIOn draWlngs The cntena of approval per
,
Sprmgfield Development Code (SDC) 5 12-125 are addressed below as well
I
SDC 5.12-125 - Tentative Plan Criteria for ADDroval
I
(,4) The request conforms to the provISIOns of thIS Code pertammg to lot/parcel Size and
dimensions.
The proposed partitIOn complies With all reqUIrements ofthe Spnngfield Development Code
I
(SDC) pertammg to parcel size and dimensIOns as demonstrated below
Parcel SIze and Street Frontage
SDC 3 2-215 reqUIres that lots or parcels on east-west streets be a mIrumum of 4,500 square feet
,
m area and have 45 feet of frontage Deadmond Ferry Road IS an east-west street Parcell Wlll
I
have about 78 feet of frontage on Deadmond Ferry Road and be 6,108 square feet m area Parcel
I
2 IS proposed as a panhandle lot Per the same code sectIOn reference above, a smgle panhandle
lot must be at 4,500 square feet exclUSive of thelpanhandle and have 20 feet of frontage Parcel
2, exclUSive of the pole portIOn, Will be 9,076 square feet and have about 44 feet of frontage
Based on these facts, both proposed parcels Wlll meet the parcel size and dimenSIOn standards of
SDC 3 2-215
Setbacks
SDC 3 2-215 reqUIres a 10 foot setback for front and rear yards ReqUIred mtenor yard setbacks
I
are 5 feet per the same code sectIOn These setback standards Will be evaluated durmg a future
I
bUlldmg permit apphcatlOn Given that there are no eXlstmg structures, the setback standards to
the proposed property hnes cannot be evaluated 'at thiS time
River Bend Manor Tentative PartitIOn
January 24, 2008
Page 2
~
Date Received
JAN 2 8 2008
(B) The zonmg IS consIstent wIth the Metro Plan diagram and/or appllc~lillR~.fIa~Rmmahitll;
diagram, Plan DIStTlet map, and Conceptual Development Plan
The plan designatIOn for the subject site and adjacent properties m the Metro Plan [S medlUm-
density residential In addition, the subject property IS zoned MDR (medIUm-denSity reSidential)
ThiS zonmg designatIOn IS consistent with the Metro Plan Land Use Diagram
In addition, the Metro Plan reqUires medIUm-density reSidential developments to be developed
With a mlOlmum of 10 and a maximum of20 uOlts per acre To demonstrate that It IS feasible to
develop the proposed parcels With enough uOlts to meet the dens1ty reqUirement, a conceptual
sIte plan IS mcluded on the drawmgs ThiS IS not an actual development plan The subject site IS
about 0 34 acres III area Below IS a table that shows the mllllmum/maxlmum number OfullltS
that would be reqUired to meet density range
Total Site Area
o 34 Acres
Density Calculation Units DIVided By Area
4 Units I 0 34 Acres = 12
MInimum Units (4) Units Per Acre
7 Units / 0 34 Acres = 20
Maximum Units (7) Units Per Acre
Date Received'
FEB - 4 2008
OnglOal submntl.\
The mllllmum number of uOlts needed to meet or exceed the m[lllmum 10 Ulllt per acre standard
would be four (4) The conceptual site plan layout mcluded With thiS apphcatlon shows that two
uOlts could be constructed on each parcel for a total of four UllltS that would prov1de a density of
12 uOlts per acre and be cons)stent WIth the SDC and Metro Plan
~--
The followmg discussIOn IS a review of the dIll1enslOnal standards (1 e setbacks) to demonstrate
that conceptual uOlts would comply With the SDC and thus be feaSible SDC 3 2-215 reqUires a
10 foot setback for front and rear yards ReqUired mtenor yard setbacks are 5 feet per the same
code sectIOn The closest uOlt to Deadmond Ferry Road on Parcell would have a front yard
setback of 10 feet and an mtenor yard setback of 5 feet to the property lme between Parcel 1 and
2 The uOlts on Parcel 2 would have mtenor yard setbacks of 11 3 feet and 5 4 feet, as well as, a
rear yard setback of 10 2 feet Based on these facts, the proposed uOlts would comply With the
dimenSIOnal standards Regardmg other standards, SDC 4 6-125 would reqUire a mllllmum of
two (2) parkmg spaces for each duplex uOlt The conceptual plan shows that there would be 12
parkmg spaces, which would be four more spaces than IS reqUired for four uOlts SDC 4 6-
150(A)(6) allows that bicycle parkmg for multiple-family developments may be proVided m
md1vldual garages Each of the conceptual UllltS would have a garage that could proVide a secure
area for bicycle storage In addition, the conceptual plan shows that there IS ample area for the
reqUired landscapmg standards to be met Given the mformatlOn presented above, It IS feasible
to develop the subject site With four uOlts and meet the mmlmum density of 10 uOlts per acre
(C) Capacity reqUirements of public and pflvate facllllles, mcludmg but not limited to, water
and electTlclty, sanItary sewer and storm water managementfacllltles; and streets and
traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public Improvements shall be aVailable
Rtver Bend Manor Tentative PartitIOn
January 24, 2008
Page 3
Date Received
FEB - 4 2008
_..."" . OnOlnal Submittal .
Ongmal SubTfllO_--*nc ...e at tlte tIme of development, unless otlterwlse provIded jor'TJy thlSToae aT'"
otlter appltcable regulatIOns. Tlte Publtc Works DIrector or a utlltty provIder sltall
determme capacity ISsues.
~
Date Received
JAN 2 8 2008
The eXisting public Improvements and proposed pnvate facll111es have a very adequate capacity
to accommodate multl-farOlly development andla possible four uOlts In the future based on the
conceptual site plan The facts below and the attached plans demonstrate that the public and
I
pnvate facilities have an adequate capacity to handle the proposed development on this slte
Wastewater
There IS an eXIsting 10" wastewater line that runs east-west In the Deadmond Ferry Road nght-
of-way There IS an eXisting 6" wastewater Imel to stubs to the subject site The proposed plans
I
prepared by the project engmeer demonstrate that there IS a large enough capacity In these
,
eXisting public lines to accommodate the type or development anticipated on thiS site There WIll
be two new pnvate 6" lines extended onto the site to serve future development There would be
I
4" pnvate servICe laterals to serve each future umt In additIOn, two c1eanouts (one along each
new pnvate line) are proposed
Water
There IS one eXlstmg water meter located adjacent to the development site The eXlstmg 12"
I
water main IS located on the north SIde of Deadmond Ferry Road The additional water meters
I
necessary to serve at least four uOlts are shown on the attached plans The eXisting water main
I
adjacent to thiS proposed part1tlOn IS very adequate to accommodate between 3 and 6 additional
I
UIUtS that Will each have mdlv1dual water services The mdlVldual W' service lines are shown on
the plan set
Stormwater Dramage
There IS an eXisting 21" storm line WIthin Deadmond Ferry Road ThiS 21" line has pretty of
,
capacity to handle runoff from between four and seven UIUts The roof dramage from both
I
parcels will be conveyed towards the eXlstmg public system via a proposed drain p1pe (as
,
mdICated on the attached storm drainage plan) !In additIOn, the locatIOn of a blO-swale to pre-
I
treat the ImpervIOus surface runoff IS shown on the site utIlity plan The project engineer has
I
prepared a storm dramage study to demonstrate that the proposed lines could handle runoff from
certain storm events
Traffic Capacity
Per the Institute of TransportatIOn Engmeers (I~E) Trrp GeneratIOn (7th Edition), the average
number of vehicle lr1ps per day per umt for smgle-fmmly detached hOUSing IS 9 57 (10%
occurnng during any peak hour) While the cor!ceptual development plan would be for multiple
I
umts, the smgle-farmly tnp generatIOn number 'fould seem to be the most conservative to
estimate potential tnps from thiS development site The total number ofumts In the conceptual
R.Jver Bend Manor Tentative ParlltlOn
January 24, 2008
Page 4
~
Date Received
JAN 2 8 2008_
OrJQlnal Submittal
development plan is four This means that the average number of dally vehicle' tnps,tor tills ,
entire development would be 38 with only 4 occumng dunng any peak hour Th[s would be a
m[nlmal amount of traffic entenng onto Deadmond Ferry Road There IS a mlOlmal amount of
additional traffic that could be anticipated from thiS development site Deadmond Ferry Road IS
paved with curbs/gutters and setback Sidewalks and can very safely accommodate the mlOlmal
mcrease m traffic
Easements
To accommodate the proposed public and pnvate utilities and pnvate improvements (I e
dnveway), there are several easements shown on the plan There are two eXlstmg easements, a
public utility easement and public dramage easement Three easements are proposed (varlable-
Width mamtenance access easement, 24 foot jomt aceess utility easement, variable-width pnvate
stormwater dramage easement)
(D) The proposed land dIVISIOn shall comply With all applicable public and private deSign and
constructIOn standards contained m thIS Code and other applicable
There are no proposed public Improvements With thiS land dlVlSlOn The applicant's project
engmeer has carefully prepared the pnvate utility plans to ensure that all pnvate deSign and
constructIOn standards can and Will be met In addition, dunng constructIOn all pnvate utlhtles
Will be mstalled accordmg to all applicable City standards
(E) PhYSical features, mcludmg, but not limited to. steep slopes With unstable soil or geologiC
conditIOns, areas wah susceptibility offloodmg; significant clusters of trees and shrubs;
watercourses shown on the WQL W Map and theIT associated riparian areas; wetlands;
rock outcroppmgs; open spaces; and areas of hIStOriC and/or archaeological significance,
as may be specified m SectIOn 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760,358.905-955 and 390.235-240,
shall be protected as specified m thiS Code or m State or Federal law.
There IS a waterway located to the west of the subject development site The centerlme of the
waterway/ditch IS shown on the plans The area on the subject property that could be susceptible
to floodmg IS mcluded m an eXlstmg, vanable width pubhc dramage easement The public
drainage easement IS delmeated on the attached plans No future development Will occur wlthm
the easement area to ensure that the area around the creek IS not Impacted and thus protected
There are no other phYSICal features located on the subject property, mcludmg steep slopes,
slgrnficant clusters of trees or shrubs, wetlands, rock outcroppmgs, or hlstonc features By
aVOidance of the dramage easement area, this cntenon IS met
Date Received
FEB - 4 2008
Onglnal submittal
RIver Bend Manor Tentative PartitIOn
January 24, 2008
Page 5
Date Received
FEB - ~ 2008
-,
Date Received.'
JAN 2 8 2008
. "",I Onglnal SubmIttal
Onglnal 'f/JpP}Jnrtng areas and Ingress-egress pOints have been designed to: facIlitate velllcular traffic,
I
bicycle and pedestnan safety to aVOid congestIOn; provide connectivity wlt/lln the
I
development area and to adjacent residentIal areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity
I
centers, and commercIal, industrIal and publIc areas, minimize curb cuts on arterIal and
I
collector streets as specified In thIS Code o~ other applIcable regulatIOns and comply with
the ODOT access management standards for state highways.
I
There IS no specific development plans proposed with this applicatIOn, thus the parkmg areas
I
cannot be fully evaluated for compliance With this cntenon Such a review of the parkmg area
I
Will be conducted with a future bUlldmg permit applicatIOn However, the conceptual site
,
development plan shows that a parkmg area could be constructed that would allow easy site
I
circulatIOn for all vehicles Vehicles would be able to back up WIthout backmg mto the nght-of-
I
way Veh1cles also would have qUick and easy access to Deadmond Ferry Road via a proposed
24 foot dnveway (mgress-egress pomt)
The mgress-egress location Will be established through thiS partitIon applicatIOn There Will only
,
be tills one mgress-egress pomt to mmlmlze curb cuts From the mgress-egress pomt, vehicles
I
and pedestnans/blcyclists Will have qUick and safe access to Deadmond Ferry Road Deadmond
I
Ferry Road provides street connectIOns With InternatIOnal Way and GarDe Farm Road GarDe
I
Farm Road then connects WIth Beltlme H[ghway and Martm Luther Kmg Jr Parkway These
latter two artenals provide access to the Gateway, Eugene, and the City center of Spnngfield
With easy access to these artenals from Deadmond Ferry Road there IS safe and conveOlent
I
access to nearby residential, commerCial, and mdustnal developments, as well as, transit stops
This proposed partitIon will provide good street connectIOns for pedestnans, bicyclists, and
veIucular traffic
(G) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be
accomplIShed in accordance with the provlllOns of thiS Code.
I
The property owner (Country Manor No 3, LLC) does not own any adjacent land Further, the
entue area of the subject property Will be fully cteveloped as a result of this proposed partition,
I
thus there WIll be no remamder that could be further divided later
I
(H)AdJacent land can be developed or IS prOVided access that wIll allow ItS development in
accordance with the provisIOns of this CodJ.
I
Accordmg to 2004 Aenal Photography from LCOG (Lane CounCil of Governments), there are
I
areas around the subject site that are not fully developed All development activity proposed
I
under thiS applicatIOn or any future site review applicatIOn Will occur on the subJ ect property
Adjacent land can be further developed m accordance With all applicable SDC reqUirements
I
There w111 be no off-Site Impacts from development on the subject site that would hmder adjacent
properties from bemg fully developed
River Bend Manor Tentative PartitIOn
January 24,2008
Page 6
. .
Date Received-
Date Received
~
FEB - 4 2008
j
JAN 2 8 2008
Onglnal Submittal Onglnal Submittal
(I) When no concurrent annexatIOn appilcatlOn IS submitted with a ParttllOn Tentative Plan
on property that IS outside of the City ilmlts but wlt/lIn the City's urbamzable area, the
standards spectfied below shall also apply
(a) The minimum area for the partltlOmng of land In the UF-10 Overlay District shall be
to acres.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.
1. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall requtre a Future
Development Plan as spectfied In SectIOn 29.070(I)(c) for ultimate development
with urban densities as reqUired In tllis Code.
2. In addition to the standards of Subsection (9)(b)1, any proposed new parcel that
IS less than 5 acres shall meet one of the following standards'
a. The property to be partitIOned shall be owned or operated by a governmental
agency or pubilc utlilty, or
b. A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property to be partitIOned
shall be smaller than five acres.
3. No more than three parcels shall be created wht/e the property remains within the
UF-10 Overlay DIStrict, unless permitted by SectIOn 34.040(2).
The subject property was annexed mto the City of Sprmgfield m 2005, thus this cntenon
[s not applicable
(J) Where the SubdivIsIOn of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park IS proposed,
the following approval crlterta apply:
1. The park was approved before July 2, 2001 and is In compllance with the standards In
SectIOn 3.2-235 or other land use regulatIOns In effect at the time the site was approved as
a manufactured dwellmg park or mobt/e home park; or the park IS an approved non-
conformmg use. In the latter case, a park IS m compilance if the City has not Issued a
notice of noncompliance on or before July 2,2001.
2 The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home
spaces prevIOusly approved or legally exlStmg m the park.
3. The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed.
4. The use of lots, as shown on the Tentative Plan, shall be I1mlted to the installatIOn of
manufactured dwellmgs; l.e, "stick-bUilt" houses are prolllblted.
5 Any other area m the SubdivIsIOn other than the proposed lots shall be used as common
property, unless park streets have prevIOusly been dedicated to the City or there are publ1c
utt/lties m the park All common property shall be addressed In a Homeowner's
ASSOCiatIOn Agreement.
a. Areas that are usedfor velllcle ctrculatlOn (streets), drtveways that serve more than
two lotslparcels or common parking areas, shall be shown In a Tract or easement on
the Tentative Plan.
b. All other services and utt/ltles that serve more than one lot shall be m a Tract or
easement. Where a service or utlilty serves only one lot, but crosses another, that
service or Utt/lty shall also be m an easement shown on the Tentative Plan.
Sprmgfield Development Code, Chapter 5 Page 56 of 118
c. EXlstmg bUlldmgs m the park used for recreatIOnal, meetmgs or other purposes for
the park residents shall be m a Tract shown on the Tentative Plan.
River Bend Manor Tentat[ve PartitIOn
January 24, 2008
Page 7
Date Recelve~.
"
JAN 2 8 2008
Onglnal Submittal
6. Any publzc utllltles shall be wlthm a publIc utllzty easement.
I
7. If publlc utilItIes or servIces are reqUlrea to serve the SubdIVIsIOn, the park owner shall
I
sIgn and execute a WQlver of the right to remonstrate agamst the formatIOn of a local
Improvement dIStrict to provIde the publzc futilitIes or servIces.
The subject a~PlicatlOn [S not for a SUbdlVlSloJOf a manufactured dwelling park, thus thIS
cntenon IS not applicable
If there are any questIOns about thiS wntten statement, please do not hesitate to contact me at
I
Metro Planmng vIa emarl (robert({iJ,metrop!annllll:( com) or phone (302-9830) For all other
questIOns about the proposed partition, please clmtact Pam Clark (project coordmator) at Olson
& Moms
Respectfully,
1 I h!
/1\ ' -I -...1---
{'1;l'-..j' --"'J~
Robert Stevens, AlCP
Associate Planner
Date Rece\\led
FEB - 4 2008
On91Oal subm1t\a1-
RIver Bend Manor Tentative Partlt[on
January 24, 2008
Page 8