Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 3/22/2007 (1\ " J ,.- ~~ .' ~- < -.J AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE N aftft- of De-U?l <JY'1, ~/7-?-( 01 srATE OF OREGON) ) ss CDunty of lane ) I. Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows 1 I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning DIvIsion of the Development Services Department, City of Spnngfleld, Oregon 2 I state that In my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies of 5lJe,zoo"-ooo6~ A..<.k ~- ~ ~ 1'J.p.(!.L'., ---.J (See attachment "A") on 3/OJ.~ ,2007 addressed to (see ~ Attachment B"), by causing said letters to be placed In a U S mall box wIth postage fully prepaid thereon K~~R~~~ STATE OF OREGON, County of lane ~ ~ ,2007 Personally appeared the above named Karen laFleur, Program Technlcla~, who acknowledged the foregoing Instrument to be theIr voluntary act Before me . OFFICIAL SEAL BRENDA JONES I , NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON COMMISSION NO 379218 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 27. 2008 ~Qk My CommIssIon Expires ~ n :JozJ r Date Received Planner AL 3~2.-k07 I / . SPRINGFIELD Notice of DeCISIon - SubdivIsion Tentative Plan ProJect Name: Dove Estates SubdivIsion ProJect Proposal The applicant proposes to develop a 14-lot residential subdivIsion on 2 I acres with associated public Improvements Case Number: SUB2006-00066 PrOject locatIon. 1057 Anderson Lane, Springfield, 17-03-33-11 TL 101 Zonmg: UF-IO/LDR at time of application submittal (Note Annexation was approved by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission on February I, 2007) Metro Plan/Refinement Plan DesIgnatIon' LDR, no Refinement Plan Proposed Density. 7 du/acre Overlay DIstricts None Pre-SubmIttal Meetmg Date: January 24, 2006 ApplicatIon SubmItted Date: November IS, 2006 DeCISIon Issued Date March 22, 2007 RecommendatIon: Approval With Conditions Appeal Deadline Date. Apnl 8, 2007 AssocIated ApplicatIons' PRE 2006-00007, LRP 2005-00040 CJTY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM , POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE Planner II Land Use Planning Linda Pauly 726-4608 Transportation Planning Engineer TransportatIon Gary McKenney 726-4585 Public Works Englneenng Utilities & Easements Matt Stouder 736-1035 Public Works Englneenng Sanitary & Storm Sewer Matt Stouder 736-1035 Deputy Fire Marshall Fire and Life Safety Gtlbert Gordon 726-2293 Community Services Manager Butldlng Dave Puent 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM OWNER/APPLICANT CONSULTANT CONSUL TANT Vern Benson Weber Elliott Engineers, PC Dave Collier 949 Hwy 99 N POBox 10145 PaCific SurveYing Eugene, OR 9740 I Eugene, OR 97440 75506 Blue Mountain Road Cottage Grove, OR 97424 SubdIVISIon T entatNe Pion SUB2006-00066 Date Received. Planner AL 1/22-!:MtJ7 / J . Map: -1_...__ I I ' -,,-"', ! I ! I I, / __F-03:27-33, '~_,_o, ,J '_/ /' I r--- \~.{ ?"'i--"-" SEQlJQ""VE", ,,/ .:.":'00 i 11300! '-/';,600 1'--'1 T-T-r--l' \ / 1-.,_,,-_. I 114001 J j, i It \ ;- I r-'~---~r-'--'- ~ ' ! "L I ! ' 'i' T ----f-'-"-f'~'='~ ~ _.J' I W7911EM'i~BlVD i ; r 'i"~~17-0~;~11 ~;lS~~:7-r- -'--- ~--i--lfL I 6100_, II LJ -'- I' I 101,; I' I - ' 002 I ~ ~ ~O i,i_'i-~ /I o -' I .! I" I' L!--1I'i ,: 33048' 'OOIJ01~: i--.Jr-} if 1 , ", 000 :-+'1,' ~ ,i-----1---f \ ''^''---- -_(-~ ---_ _ 100 16700 i j >---J I \ I < : TI I-LJJI: \,!.' j i I I or. ,,----j---- ' J-=t-~''1- Ii 102 I '-'''/--1'\ \', I' -r ~~\ /~ j ~ ___---'-.1 17000 ":. ; \ ,/,: ,I , I : I ,'." I \\.- -I -{ "'- II -LL. i,', ./ ,/'~' \' I' , :'-'" '----h' '/r-1If-----r \~ \,' ('"<i'-., I _I,,; L ' ---::-----____-11 ,~,,~,~~I Ii i II ;!.:: :-~'L~~~(.;:.-. \ i I I /, -, ,j ill I /--, / ./.." \.-.. ' f I ' '')..... I ,I_! I i I ,_/' "",7- \ " i Ii""",,;.,... _ --,_._ I.: :' SUBJECT PROPERTY 1057 Anderson Lane 2. f acres , I I , ! 002 Decision: Tentative Plan approval with :conditions, as of the date of this letter. The standards of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) applicable to each criterion of Subdivision Approval are listed herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes unless specifically noted with findings and conditions necessary for compliance. All improvements are required to be installed as shown on the aODroved plan or as conditioned. Anv oroposed chan~es to the tentative olan must be submitted to the Planning Division and approved prior to ' installation. Public Improvement Plans and die SubC:ivision Final Plat must conform to the submitted plans as conditioned herein, This is J limited land use decision made according to city code and state statutes. Unless appealed, the deci.ion is final. Please read this document carefully, I Other Uses That May Be Authorize!! By The Decision: None. The proposed Subdivision as conditioned is in accordance with SDC Article 35, Future development will be in accordance with the provisions of the SDC. filed ea~eme~ts and agreements, and all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 1 I Review Process: This application is reviewed under Type II procedures listed in SDC 3.080 and the subdivision criteria of approval, SDC 35.050. A complete application was accepted by the Director prior to the review of the request as specified in Section 3.050, Application Submittal and contained all information required to begin the review process in accordance with I SDC Articles 3 and 35, This application was accepted as complete on November 15, 2006. Upon review of the application, the Development Review Committee determined that the application as submitted could not be approved. The applicant was notified in a letter dated , December 5, 2006. On December 12. 2006 the applicant submitted a request to extend the 120-day review period to allow submittal of a r~vised application which would address the six specific deficiencies which had been identified by staff. The review period was extended to June 23, 2007, The revised application was received on February 23, 2007. Subdivision Tentative Pian SUB1006-00066 , 1 DescriptIon of Proposal The owner of the subJect property proposes to develop a residential subdivIsion on 2 I acres The subdivIsion will Include 14 lots and all necessary Infrastructure to support the development The property was recently annexed to allow the proposed residential use and denSity In conformance with SDC 160 I 0 (I) SIte InformatIon: The property IS located at 1057 Anderson Lane, at the southeast corner of Centennial Boulevard and Anderson Lane The property IS currently developed with one residence According to the SOil Survey of Lane County, the mapped soil senes are 76 - Malabon Urban Land Complex (depth to water table >6 feet) The site IS relatively level Comments ReceIved. Applications for Limited Land Use DecIsions require the notification of property owners/occupants wIthin 300 feet of the proposed development and allow for a 14- day comment penod pnor to the staff decIsion [SDC 3 080 and 14 030] The applicant and parties submitting wntten comments dunng the notice penod have appeal nghts and are mailed a copy of this deCISion for conSideration In accordance with SDC 3080 and 14030, notice was sent to owner/occupants within 300 feet of the subJect site on November 17, 2006 No comments were received In response to the notice SDC 35050 Tentative Plan - Criteria of Approval The Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) 35050 states The DIrector shall approve, approve wIth condItions a SubdIvIsIon Tentative Plan upon determmmg that all applicable crIteria of approval have been satIsfied If conditIons cannot be attached to satIsfy the crIterIa, the DIrector shall deny the applicatIon, SubdiVISion T entotlve Plan SUB2006-00066 Date Received Planner AL B /n./2fJCf7 I J Criterion (I). The request as condItIoned fully conforms to the requIrements of thIS Code pertaining to lot sIze and dImenSIons I Finding' The proposed lots will take access from a new street to be constructed by the applicant The proposed street alignment extends west to east from Anderson Lane, then curves north and terminates In a hammerhead ThiS street IS primarily east-west, with one north-south segment Proposed lots I, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14 meetthe 4,500 sq ft minimum lot size and street frontage requirements established by 5DC 16030 (I) Proposed lots 5, 6 and II meet the 5,000 sq ft minimum lot size and street frontage requirements established by SDC 16030 (2) Proposed lot 4 IS a panhandle lot which meets the standards of SDC 16030 (6) Proposed lot 5 meets the 6,000 sq ft mInimum lot size and street frontage requirements of SDC 16030 (3) Conclusion: The proposed lot sizes and dimenSions are m full conformance With SDC 16 030 The proposal satisfies Criterion I Criterion (2) The zoning IS consIstent WIth the Metro Plan dIagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan dIagram, Plan DIstrict map, and Conceptual Development Plan Finding: The property IS zoned Low DenSity ReSidential (LDR) The Metro Plan deSignatIon IS LDR The zoning IS consistent With the Metro Plan diagram There IS no adopted refinement plan ConclUSIon. The proposal satisfies Criterion 2 Criterion (3) CapacIty requIrements of publIC Improvements, including but not lImIted to water and electriCIty, sanitary sewer and storm water management faCIlitIes, and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the publIC Improvements shall be ava"able to serve the sIte at the tIme of development, unless otherwIse prOVIded for by thIS Code and other applIcable regulations The Public Works D,rector or a utIlity prOVIder shall determine capacIty Issues. Criterion (4) The proposed development shall comply WIth all applIcable publIC and prIVate deSIgn and constructIon standards contained In thIS Code and other applIcable regulatIons Finding The Public Works Director's representatives have reviewed the proposed subdiVISion City staffs review comments have been mcorporated m findmgs and conditions contained herem I Flndmg: Criterion 3 and 4 contain different elements WIth sub-elements and applicable code standards The subdiVISion application as submitted complies With the applicable code standards listed under each sub-element unless otherwise noted With speCific findings and conclUSions The elements, sub-elements and code standards of Criterion 3 and 4 mclude but are not limited to SubdiVISIon T entatJve Plan SUB2006-00066 4 Public and Private Improvements In Accordance with SDC 31 and 32 . Public Streets and Related Improvements [SDC 32020-32 090J . Sanitary Sewer Improvements [SDC 32 100J . Storm Water Management [SDC 32 110, 31 240J . Water and Electric Improvements [SDC 32 120( I)J . Fire and Life Safety Improvements [SDC 32 120(3)] o Public and Private Easements [SDC 32 120( I) and (5)J Conformance with standards of SDC 3 I, Site Plan Review, and Article 16, Residential Zoning . Lot Dimensions, Block and Panhandle Lot Standards [SDC 35030J . Lot Coverage and Setbacks [SDC 16 040 - 16 050J . Height Standards [SDC 16 060J . Off-Street Parking Standards [SDC 16070 and 31 170-230J . Fence Standards [SDC 16 090J . Landscaping Standards [SDC 31 130- 150J o Screening and lighting [SDC 3 I 160J Conformance with Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements . No Overlay D,stncts are applicable and there IS no Refinement Plan Public and Private Improvements In Accordance with SDC 31 and 32 Finding The Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed subdiVISion and the surrounding public services Except for the following, the public Improvements are sufficient to serve the proposed parcels PUBLIC STREETS AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS ACCESS - FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY Finding Based on ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single-Family Detached Housing) new trip generation from thiS subdivIsion IS estimated to be as follows . Average Weekday = 13 dwelling Units x 9 57 tripS per dwelling units = 124 tripS . PM Peak Hour = 13 dwelling Units x I 01 tripS per dwelling Units = 13 tripS In addition, the assumed development would generate pedestrian and bicycle tripS According to the "Household" survey done by LCOG In 1994, 126 percent of household tnps are made by bicycle or walking and I 8 percent are by transit bus These tripS may have their origins or destinations at a variety of land uses, including thiS use Pedestrian and bicycle trips create the need for sidewalks, pedestnan crossing signals, crosswalks, bicycle parking and bicycle lanes Finding. The development site has approximately 280 feet of frontage on Anderson Lane and 330 feet of frontage on Centennial Boulevard Centennial Boulevard IS a five-lane minor arterial street The Centennial Boulevard site frontage IS fully Improved, and no subdivIsion access IS proposed onto Centennial Anderson Lane IS a 36-foot wide asphalt local street Within a 60- foot nght of way The westerly portion of Anderson Lane IS fully Improved With curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting The applicant proposes to construct full public Improvements on Anderson Lane southward from Centennial Boulevard along the site frontage and to construct a public street east of Anderson Lane to serve the development SubdIVISIon T entatJve Plan SUB2006-00066 Date Received, Planner AL 3/1:J-!.2tJtJ7 . . 5 ~ Finding' To provide for safe pedestrian and v'Thlcular access, street Iightmg IS needed that will adequately Illuminate the public travel ways wlthm and adjacent to the development site The City'S street lighting standards, which are based Ion the IIlummatmg Englneermg SOCiety (IES) , American National Standard Practice for Roadway Llghtmg RP-8, specify the Iightmg type and required Iightmg levels for street and pedestrian areas Finding' No street lights are proposed by the applicant Condition I. The Public Improvements Plans for Anderson Lane and the mternal street servmg the subdiVISion shall mclude street lighting that meets adopted city street Iightmg standards Finding The applicant proposes to construct a new 28-foot Wide cul-de-sac local street (Dove Lane) extendmg eastward from Anderson Lane on a centerline located 190 feet south of Centennral Boulevard ThiS street would serve lots I through 10 and would termmate m a hammerhead-type turnaround A 90-degree turn m the street at the entrance to the turnaround has a proposed centerlme radiUS of 65 9 feet The Impacts on driver Sight distance from the narrow street Width and restricted turnmg radiUS require that on-street parkmg be restricted m the vlcmlty of thiS turn In addition, Springfield Fire and Life Safety Department typically requires that parkmg on 28-foot Wide streets be limited to one Side of the street, and prohibited wlthm turnaround areas In order to function effectively for public and emergency access, the hammerhead turn-around area at the end of the street must be unobstructed at all times Condition 2: Public Improvements Plans for Dove Lane shall mclude signs and markmgs as necessary to prohibit on-street parkmg east of property Ime separatmg Lots 13 and 14, and on the north Side of the street m the remalnrng section "No Parkmg-Flre lane" signs shall be posted on the north Side of the street and around the hammerhead turnaround per 2004 Springfield Fire Code 503 2 I , SFC 503 3 and SFC AppendiX D I 03 I Signs shall be mstalled prior to Plat approval STREET NAMES/ADDRESSING Finding Street names are subject to Spnngfield Munrclpal Code 3 240-3 248 Street Naming and Addressmg PoliCies Proposed street names are also are reviewed by the Lane County Road Name AdVISOry Committee to check for duplication Finding: The applicant proposes to name the new street "Dove Lane" The proposed street name was reviewed by the LCOG Road Name AdVISOry Committee and service agencies (mcludmg Lane 911 and USPS) The street name "Dove Lane" IS already muse m the City of Eugene and cannot be duplicated Condition 3: Prior to Plat application submittal, the applicant shall receive approval of an alternate street name To facilitate thiS task, please send an email to Ipauly(cj)cl sPringfield or us or Andy Llmblrd at alimblrd<1Vcl springfield or us With several alternate street names Finding' As conditioned, eXlstmg and proposed transportation faCilities would be adequate to accommodate additional tripS generated by the proposed development m a safe and effiCient manner SubdIVISIon T entatJve Plan SUB2006-00066 6 STREET TREES SDC 32 050 Fmdmg, The applicant's plans do not Include a street tree proposal Street trees are reqUired for this development Proposed lots I, II and 12 have frontage on Anderson Lane Proposed lots 1,2, 3,4,5,6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 have frontage on the new street serving the subdivIsion (referred to as "Dove Lane" In the plans) Proposed lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and II have frontage on Centennial Boulevard Fmdmg A "Welcome to Spnngfield" sign IS located In the nght of way abutting proposed lot 11 at the southeast corner of Centennial Boulevard and Anderson Lane This sign marks the gateway Into Spnngfield from the west Fmdmg. The property's Centennial Boulevard frontage IS fully developed but there are no street trees In the nght of way The northern property line of the subject property abuts the curbside Sidewalk and does not prOVide space within the nght of way for the required street trees Fmdmg The site contains numerous trees and no tree felling application has been submitted A Tree Felling application IS reqUired for this development A minimum of ten trees Will be removed to construct the street and Sidewalks and additional trees will be removed to develop the homes and utilities on the lots Some of the eXisting trees may be good candidates for retention as street andlor yard trees -CondItion 4' Pnor to PIP approval, the follOWing eXisting trees located along Anderson Lane and adjacent CO the proposed street serving the subdivIsion shall be evaluated for retention to meet the Spnngfield Development Code, as stated In the DeSign Standards and Procedures Manual 6 02 1 EXisting Trees 36" dbh oak Lot I I Anderson Lane frontage 36" dbh oak lot II Anderson lane frontage 36" dbh oak Lot 12 Anderson Lane frontage (2) 6.12" dbh holly Lot I Anderson Lane frontage 14" and 6" apple Lot I New street frontage 30" dbh oak Lot 5 New street frontage 24" dbh oak lot 5 New street frontage 48" dbh spruce Lot 6 New street frontage 38" dbh oak Lot 7 New street frontage 6" dbh frUit Lot 8 New street frontage 5DC 32050 (I) states New street trees shall be at least 2 mches m cahper. New street trees shall be selected from the CIty Street Tree lIst and mstalled as speCIfied m the City'S Engmeermg DeSign Standards Manual. The Pubhc Works Director shall determme which species are permitted or prohibIted as street trees. Fmdmg' Engineering DeSign Standards and Procedures Manual 6 02 states "When conSidering a street tree deSign, eXisting trees, deSirable tree species, tree locations, planting procedures, and plant establishment shall be taken Into account The goal IS to have street trees that are planted approximately 30 feet apart, but not planted In sites that Will cause trees to a nUisance or Interfere with nelghbonng utilities or eXisting vegetation" The City'S street tree standards and the list of approved street trees species are found In the Engineering DeSign Standards and Procedures Manual, chapter 6 6 0 1 states "The purpose of SubdiVISion T entatJve Plan SUB2006-00066 Date Received Planner AL 3/n/Mo7 ( / 7 creating desIgn standards for street trees IS to ensure that City streets are hned with healthy, vigorous trees chosen for their aesthetics according to type and SpeCieS, and planted In appropnate locations sUitable to VISiOn clearance and overhead obstructions, while minimizing root damage to utlhtles, curbs, and sidewalks A well-designed street tree layout will promote a pleasing Image of the City and appreciate the value of the neighborhood" Engineering DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual 6 02 2 states "Where curbsIde sidewalks eXist or are proposed, street trees shall be planted at least five feet back of sidewalk, but not more than I 0 feet" Condition 5: The Public Improvement Plans shall Include a street tree proposal which provides street trees that are planted approximately 30 feet apart EXisting trees which have been evaluated pursuant to COnditiOn 5 and found to be acceptable by the Pubhc Works Director's authonzed representative shall be counted as street trees and shall be protected dunng construction In accordance with best management practices and Engineering DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual 6 02 I The required 2" caliper size street trees shall be Installed 5-10 feet behind the sidewalk, In accordance with the Englneenng DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual Additional street trees may be required at building permit reView, when dnveway locations are proposed All trees shall be large canopy species trees selected from the "Planter Stnps 8-12 feet" hst In the Englneenng DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual, chapter 6 Trees shall be Installed pnor to Plat approval or bonded Installation shall be as speCified In the City'S Engineering DesIgn Standards Manual Fmdmg. As conditioned, the applicant's plans Will provide street trees 10 accordance wIth SDC 32050 and the Englneenng Design Standards and Procedures Manual, chapter 6 SANITARY SEWER SDC 32 100 SDC 32 100 (I) states Sanitary sewers shall be mstalled to serve each new development and to connect the developments to eXisting mains. Installation of sanitary sewers shall prOVide suffiCient access for maintenance actiVities and shall comply With the provIsions of thiS Code, With the Public Works Standard Construction SpeCifications, the City'S Engmeermg Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Springfield MUnicipal Code, 1997 and Department of Environmental Quality regulations. SDC 32100 (2) states The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prIor to development approval SDC 35030 (3) states Panhandle lots shall comply With the standards speCified m Section 16.030 (6) In the case of multiple panhandles m subdiVIsions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots shall occur prior to recording the SubdiVISion Plat I Finding' The applicant proposes to extend the eXisting 8-lnch pubhc wastewater line 10 Anderson Lane (located south of the development) to serve the subdiVISion via Dove Lane The 8-mch Ime will then extend up Dove Lane wlth:servlce laterals to serve all lots Within the development. SubdIVISIon T entatlve Plan I SUB2006-00066 I I I I 8 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SDC 32110 SDC 32 110 (2) states The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate pubhc and/or private stormwater management systems provIsions have been made as determined by the Pubhc Works Director, consistent with the Engmeermg Design Standards and Procedures Manual SDC 32 110 (3) states that a stormwater management system shall accommodate potential run- off from Its entire upstream drainage area, whether inSide or outside of the development SDC 32 110 (4) reqUires that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge Finding The application proposes a stormwater management system to control site drainage and treat stormwater runoff Stormwater runoff from the Site will be directed Into a series of newly constructed curb Inlets and stormwater pipes The applicant proposes extension of the public stormwater pipe located In Anderson lane Finding The applicant has not proposed any water quality treatment measures With the plan submittal, and thus has not met the reqUirements of the City'S MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the City's EDSPM Condition 6: Prior to approval of the Public Improvement Plans, the applicant shall provide water quality control measures for the subdiVISion which meet the reqUirements set forth In Section 303 3 B of the City's Engineering DeSIgn Standards & Procedures Manual ThiS can occur dUring the deSign phase of the Public Improvement Plans UTILITIES SDC 32 120 (I )(a) and (b) state All utlhty providers will be responsible for coordinating utlhty installations With the City and the developer, and the developer shall be responSible for the deSign, installation, and cost of utlhty hnes and faclhtles to the satisfaction of the utlhty prOVider, SDC 32120 (2) states Whenever pOSSible, all utlhty hnes shall be placed underground. Installation of new overhead power IS allowed only for facilities listed under SDC 32 120 (29(a)-(h) Finding: Underground electriC service Will be prOVided by SUB In hiS letter dated 3/1/07, Guenter Matyszak from SUB ElectriC stated that two options are available to extend electriC service to the Site, however Option I would require new overhead lines across Centennial Boulevard, which IS inconsistent With City policy Thus service shall be prOVided as deSCribed In Option 2 from pole 94083 A street cut will be reqUired for thiS service and Will reqUire a facilities permit from Lane County Contact Guenter Matyszak at SUB ElectriC Department 736-3296 for additional information Finding. The applicant proposes to extend a public water line to serve all lots Within the development from the eXisting 8-Inch water line In Anderson Lane DEDICATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EASEMENTS SDC 32 120 (5)(a) states "An apphcant proposing a development shall make arrangements With the City and each utlhty prOVider for the dedication of utlhty SubdIVISIOn Tentative Plan SUB2006-00066 Date Received Planner AL 3/n/2oP7 , / 9 easements necessary to fully service the ~evelopment or land beyond the development area. The mInimum Width for public utility easements adjacent to I street rights of way shall be 7 feet The minimum Width for all other public utility easements shall be 14 feet." Finding, The applicant has proposed 7 foot public utility easements along the frontage of all I lots Additionally, the applicant has proposed a 10 foot public utility easement located between lots 12 and 13 to accommodate sewer and wat~r line extenSion to lots 10 and II I Finding: SUB ElectriC reViewed the proposed subdiVISion and has requested the followmg additional easements to provide electric service to the lots location Width I Centered on the property Ime I 0 feet between lots II and 12 2 Centered on the property line I 0 feet between lots 10 and 13 3 Centered on the property Ime I 0 feet between lots 2 and 3 Finding The applicant proposes to locate a private sewer lateral (to serve lots 10 and II) wlthm a public utility easement City policy prohibits the location of private mfrastructure wlthm public utility easements CondItion 7: Prior to Fmal Plat approval, the applicant shall locate the private sewer lateral extension for lots 10 and II wlthm a private utility easement Condition 8 The proposed public and private utility easements, the followmg public utility easements requested by SUB Electrlcand any additional public and/or private easements which may be necessary to prOVide storm, sanitary or utilities to the lots shall be shown on the Plat. location Width I Centered on the property line I 0 feet between lots II and 12 2 Centered on the property line I 0 feet between lots 10 and 13 3 Centered on the property Ime I 0 feet between lots 2 and 3 Conformance With standards of SDC Article 3 I, Site Plan ReView, and Article 16, ReSidential Zoning ConclUSion: The applicant's proposal IS m accordance With the applicable standards of SDC 3 I and Article 16 Lot coverage standards (SDC 16040], setbacks [SDC 16050 (I )-(4)], solar setback requirements [SDC 16050 (5)], and buildmg heights [SDC 16060], street tree placement and other lot-specific standards are reViewed upon submittal of building permits SubdiVISion T entatJve Plan I SUB1006-00066 10 Conformance with Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements Fmdmg There are no applicable Overlay Districts and there IS no Refinement Plan ConclUSion' As conditioned, the proposal satisfies Criterion 3 and 4 Criterion (5) Parking areas and Ingress-egress pOints have been desIgned to faCIlItate vehIcular traffic, bIcycle and pedestrran safety to aVOId congestIon, provIde connectIvIty WIthin the development area and to adJacent resIdentIal areas, tranSIt stops, neIghborhood actIvIty centers, and commercIal, Industrral and publIC areas, minImIZe curb cuts on arterral and collector streets as specIfied In ArtIcle 31, 32, the approprrate refinement plan, and comply WIth the OOOT access management standards for state hIghways Finding: Installation of driveways on a street Increases the number of traffic conflict pOints The greater number of conflict pOints Increases the probability of traffic crashes Effective ways to reduce the probability of traffic crashes Include redUCing the number of driveways, increasing distances between intersections and driveways, and establishing adequate VISion clearance where driveways Intersect streets Each of these techniques permits a longer, less cluttered Sight distance for the motOrist, reduces the number and difficulty of deCISions drivers must make, and contributes to Increased traffic safety SDC 32 OBO( I) (a) stipulates that each parcellS entitled to "an approved access to a public street" Finding' lot II would have approximately 70 feet of tangent frontage on Anderson Lane south of the curb return at Centennial Boulevard SDC Table 32-4 speCifies that reSidential driveways onto local streets shall be separated from the nearest intersection curb return by a minimum of 30 feet Traffic safety conSiderations including traffic speeds on Centennial Boulevard and the location of Lot II In relation to the Centennial Boulevard/Anderson Lane intersection require that driveway access to lot II be located as far from the intersection as IS feaSible Condition 9: Driveway access to Lot 11 from Anderson Lane shall be located near the southern boundary of the lot, as far from the Intersection as IS feaSible In no case shall the driveway be located less than 30 feet from the Centennial Boulevard/Anderson Lane Intersection Finding: As conditioned, Ingress-egress pOints have been planned to faCIlitate traffic and pedestrian safety, aVOid congestion and to minimiZe curb cuts on public streets as speCified In SDC Articles 31 and 32, applicable zoning and or overlay dIStrict Articles, and applicable refinement plans ConclUSion As conditioned, the proposal satisfies Criterion 5 Criterion (6): PhYSIcal features, including but not limIted to SIgnificant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQlW Map and theIr assocIated rrparran areas, wetlands, rock outcropplngs and hlStorrc features have been evaluated and protected as reqUIred by thIS Code. 5U82006-00066 Date Received Planner AL J/);;'/.2~7 , / SubdIVISIon Tentative Plan /I Finding: The Metro Area General Plan, vyater Quality Limited Watercourse Map, State DesIgnated Wetlands Map, Hydnc SOils Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps and the list of H,stonc Landmark sites have been :consulted and with the exceptIon noted below, there are no features needing to be protectea or preserved on this site If any artifacts are found dunng construction, there are state laws that could apply, ORS 97740, ORS 358905, ORS 390235 If human remains are discovered dunng construction, It IS a Class "c" felony to proceed under ORS 97 740 Finding: The site containS numerous trees and no tree felling application has been submItted A Tree Felling application IS required for this development A minimum of ten trees will be removed to construct the street and sidewalks and additional trees will be removed to develop the homes and utilities on the lots Some of the eXisting trees may be good candidates for retention as street and/or yard trees Finding: Crltenon 6 IS not met Physical features (trees) have not been evaluated and protected as reqUired by SDC Article 38 Finding' Additional trees and/or vegetation may be required through Tree Felling Conditions of Approval to mitigate tree felling on the subject property as necessary to meet SDC 38 040(S) Upon review of the reqUired Tree Felling application, replacement (mitigation) trees may be reqUired to be placed Within the rear yard setbacks (5-10 feet south of property/fence lines) for proposed lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and II along Centennial Boulevard, and retention of eXisting trees and/or replacement (mitigation) trees may be reqUired to be placed as a backdrop to the "Welcome to Springfield" sIgn The condItIon of the eXIsting trees shall be considered and evaluated as part of the Tree Felling permit process All tree felling and revegetation shall be pursuant to the Notice of DecIsion - Tree Felling for the subject property and thIs deCISion ConditIon 10 Pnor to submittal of public Improvement plans and LDAP approval, the applicant shall submit and receive approval of a Tree Felling application for the subJect property Any conditions of approval (e g replacement trees) required In the Tree Felling Notice of DeCISion shall be met pnor to Plat approval ConclUSion As conditioned, the physICal and h,stonc features of the subject property features have been evaluated and protected as reqUired by this Code The proposal satIsfies Cntenon 6 Criterion (7) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownershIp can be accomplIshed In accordance WIth the prOVISIons of thIS Code Finding: There IS no other adjOining property under the same ownership that can be further developed ConclUSIon: The proposal satIsfies Cnterlon 7 Criterion (8) AdJacent land can be developed or IS prOVIded access that wIll allow Its development In accordance WIth the prOVISIOns of thIS Code SubdiVISIon T entatJVe Plan 5UB2006-00066 I /2 Finding: The subdivIsion Improvements will provide a new cul-de-sac street, including a hammerhead turnaround for Fire and Life Safety vehicles Approval of the proposed subdiVISion will not Impede development of adjacent land ConclUSIon: The proposaJ satisfies Criterion 8 CONCLUSION The Tentative SubdiVISion, as submitted and condItIoned, complies With CrIteria 1-8 of SDC 35 050 No portions of the proposal approved as submItted may be substantively changed during the public Improvement or platting processes as stated In SDC 35 100. CondItions of Approval Condition I The Public Improvements Plans for Anderson Lane and the Internal street serving the subdivIsion shall Include street lighting that meets adopted City street lighting standards Condition 2: Public Improvements Plans for Dove Lane shall Include signs and markings as necessary to prohibit on-street parking east of property line separating lots /3 and /4, and on the north Side of the street In the remaining section "No Parking-Fire Lane" signs shall be posted on the north Side of the street and around the hammerhead turnaround per 2004 Springfield Fire Code 503 2 1 , SFC 503 3 and SFC AppendiX D I 03 I Signs shall be Installed prior to Plat approval CondItIon 3. Prior to Plat application submittal, the applicant shall receive approval of an alternate street name To faCilitate thiS task, please send an email to Ipaulyla)cl springfield or us or Andy Llmblrd at alimblrd{alCl sPringfield or us With several alternate street names Condition 4. Prior to PIP approval, the follOWing eXisting trees located along Anderson Lane and adjacent to the proposed street serving the subdiVISion shall be evaluated for retention to meet the Springfield Development Code, as stated In the DeSign Standards and Procedures Manual 6 02 / EXisting Trees 36" dbh oak Lot II Anderson Lane frontage 36" dbh oak Lot II Anderson Lane frontage 36" dbh oak Lot 12 Anderson Lane frontage (2) 6-12" dbh holly Lot I Anderson Lane frontage 14" and 6" apple Lot I New street frontage 30" dbh oak lot 5 New street frontage 24" dbh oak lot 5 New street frontage 48" dbh spruce Lot 6 New street frontage 38" dbh oak Lot 7 New street frontage 6" dbh frUit Lot 8 New street frontage Condition 5: The Public Improvement Plans shall Include a street tree proposal which prOVides street trees that are planted approximately 30 feet apart EXisting trees which have been evaluated pursuant to Condition 5 and found to be acceptable by the Public Works Director's authOrized representative shall be counted as street trees and shall be protected during construction In accordance With best management practices and Engmeermg DeSign Standards and Procedures Manual 6 02 I The required 2" caliper size street trees shall be Installed 5-10 feet behind the Sidewalk, In accordance With the Engmeermg DeSign Standards and Date ReceIved 1/:J-2- hoe? Planner AL I / SubdIVISIon Tenta"v. Plan SUB2006-00066 13 Procedures Manual AddItIonal street trees may be reqUIred at building permIt reVIew, when driveway locatIons are proposed All trees shal,1 be large canopy specIes trees selected from the "Planter StripS 8-12 feet" list In the Engmeermg DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual, chapter 6 Trees shall be Installed prior to Plat approval or bonded InstallatIon shall be as specIfied In the CIty'S Engineering DesIgn Standards Manual I Condition 6: Prior to approval of the Public Irryprovement Plans, the applicant shall provIde water quality control measures for the subdIVISIon whIch meet the reqUIrements set forth In Sectfon 303 3 B of the CIty'S Engmeerlng Design Standards & Procedures Manual ThIs can occur dUring the desIgn phase of the Public Improvement Plans I Condition 7: Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall locate the private sewer lateral extensIon for lots 10 and II WIthin a private utIlity easement , ConditIon 8, The proposed public and Private utIlity easements, the follOWing public utilIty easements requested by SUB Electrfcand any addlt10nal public and/or private easementS which may be necessary to provIde storm, sanftary or utIlitIes to the lots shall be shown on the Plat. locatIon W,dth 4 Centered on the property line , I 0 feet between lots I I and 12 S Centered on the property line I 0 feet between lots 10 and 13 6 Centered on the property line I 0 feet between lots 2 and 3 Condition 9: Driveway access to Lot II from Anderson Lane shall be located near the southern boundary of the lot, as far from the Intersectfon as IS feaSIble In no case shall the driveway be located less than 30 feet from the Centennfal Boulevard/Anderson Lane Intersection CondItIon 10. Prior to submIttal of public Improvement plans and LDAP approval, the applicant shall submIt and receIve approval of a Tree Felling appllcatfon for the subject property Any condItIons of approval (e g replacement trees) reqUired In the Tree Felling NotIce of DeCISIon shall be met prior to Plat approval What Needs To Be Done? , The SubdIVISion pre-submIttal meetmg shall be held wlthm two years of the date of Tentative Plan approval. The mylars and applicatIon fee shall be submitted wlthm 180 days of the Pre-submIttal meetmg. If the applicant has not submitted the SubdIVISIon Plat wlthm these tImes, TentatIve Plan approval shall become null and VOId and re-submlttal ofthe Tentative Plan shall be reqUIred. A Final Plat applicatIon IS charged upon submIttal of the complete applicatIon and all reqUired documents, and after all condItIons of approval are met, including the constructIon of public and private Improvements and extenSIon of utIlitIes' reqUIred through thIS deCISIon THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, AND/OR THE FINAL PLAT MUST BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFOR~ITYTO THE TENTATIVE PLANS Upon sIgnature by the CIty Surveyor and the Planning Manager, the Plat mylar may be submItted to Lane County for recordatIon No mdlvlduallots may be transferred until the Plat IS recorded and the mylar copy of the filed partItIon .s returned to the City Surveyor. SubdiVISIon T entatJve Plan , I 5UB20p6-00066 14 . and five (5) copies of the filed subdivIsion are returned to the Develooment ServIces Department by the applicant. Additional Information The application, all documents, and eVidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available at a cost of $0 75 for the first page and $050 for each additional page at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon Appeals: If you Wish to appeal this Type II Limited Land Use - SubdiVISion deCISion, your application must comply With SDC Article 15, APPEALS Appeals must be submitted on a City form and a fee of $250 00 must be paid to the City at the time of submittal The fee Will be returned to the appellant If the Planning CommiSSion approves the appeal application In accordance With SDC 15020 (2) which prOVides for a 15 day appeal period and Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule' O(c) for service of notice by mall, the appeal period for this decIsion expires at 5:00 p.m. on April 8, 2007. QuestIOns' Please call Linda Pauly In the Planning D,v,s,on of the Development ServICes Department at (541) 726-4608 If you have any questions regarding this process Prepared by. Linda Pauly Planner II Date Received Planner AL d/:JJ/2<707 I / SubdIVISIon T entatJve Plan 5UB2006-00066 /5 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Vern Benson 949 Hwy 99 N Eugene, OR 97401 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Weber Elllott Englneers, PC PO Box 10145 Eugene, OR 97440 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST I SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Dave Colller Paclflc SurveYlng 75506 Blue Mountaln Road Cottage Grove, OR 97424 Date f{ecelved 3/),) /:J.ofTJ Planner AL '/ Cl:ttQ ~ _b