HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 5/22/2007
Page 1 of 1
L1MBIRD Andrew
From: DONOVAN James
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1 30 PM
To: L1MBIRD Andrew
.
Subject: RE Revised PC Report ASAP TUES
Oh and one more thought I had while running cross check your reso/ord and see If that language fits In the
final findings
JD
From: LIMBIRD Andrew
Sent: TuesdaYI May 22/200711:52 AM
To: DONOVAN James
Subject: RE: Revised PC Report ASAP TUES
Sounds good, thanks
From: DONOVAN James
Sent: Tuesday, May 22,200711:50 AM
To: LIMBIRD Andrew; GRILE Bill; KNAPEL Carole; LEAHY Joe (HL)
Subject: RE: Revised PC Report ASAP TUES
Andy,
Can we add a "because" statements to conclusion c and d which restate the criterion and the basIc conclusory
statements (Ie. the submitted TIA indicates that no major Impacts to the street system will occur and no
mitigations are required and d) something to the effect that "Staff finds that the public good served by the
vacation and required by the bond measure outweighs the public good provided by the current street location ..
Feel free to word smith It a bit but I think It IS our Job to state the ObVIOUS,
From: LIMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, May 22/200711:10 AM
To: DONOVAN James; GRILE Bill; KNAPEL Carole
Subject: ReVised PC Report
Attached please find a revised staff report incorporating the changes we discussed yesterday Please let me
know If there are any more edits or additional content required Thanks
Andy
Date Received: S/:J.2../2otJ7
Planner: AL ' I
5/22/2007