The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 16 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Department: Staff Contact: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: March 19,2007 Regular Session . Public Works C€6 JeffPaschal~ 726-1674 ~ 10 minutes SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: 2008-20 12 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN ACTION REQUESTED: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT/NOT ADOPT THE 2008-2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN. ISSUE STATEMENT: The City of Springfield 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Program - A Community Reinvestment Plan, has been drafted by staff, reviewed by the Planning Commission (2/21/07), and the City Council in work session (3/12/07). It is now ready for public hearing and adoption. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Draft 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Program DISCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT: The draft City of Springfield 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Program, A Community Reinvestment Plan, was reviewed at the Planning Commission's February 21,2007 meeting. The Commission recommended Council approval of the plan. The City Council then reviewed the draft CIP in work session on March 12, 2007 and approved the CIP as drafted to be brought to public hearing at this meeting. After hearing public comments, Council is requested to adopt the Capital Improvement Program by motion. ity 0 I ring ield ) re on Capital Improvement F rogram A Communit.Y Keinvestment Flan 2008-201 2 FISCAL YEARS 2008-2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN City of Springfield, Oregon Mayor: Sidney ~ Leiken Councilors: Anne Ballew Christine Lundberg Joe Pishioneri David Ralston John Woodrow Hillary Wylie Prepared by: Public Works Department March 2007 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 58 T ABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1. TABLES Capital Improvements Review Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. i Definitions of Project Categories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Glossary of Funding Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii SECTION 2. SCHEDULES Summary of Proposed Expenditures by Project Category. . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Summary of Proposed Revenues and Expenditures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2007-08. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. vi Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2008-09. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Vll Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2009-10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. V111 Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2010-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ix Proposed Proj ects and Funding for FY 2011-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. x SECTION 3. PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR FUNDING Development Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I-I Justice Center Facility ................................... II-I Neighborhood Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. III-l Preservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-I Transportation Safety & Enhancement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-I SECTION 4. INDEX............................................... VI ATTACHMENT A PAGE 2 OF 58 TABLE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA All of the following factors are used to evaluate and rank projects for listing in the CIF. In order to prioritize the use of scarce funds, these criteria are used to make sure the projects in the CIF meet the City's goals and priorities. . Consistency with the Metro Plan and all other phases of City planning. . Compliance with State or Federal laws or regulations. . Maximize current City investment in existing capital facilities.. . Facilitate infill development within the existing City limits. . Minimize or balance the initial cost, life cycle cost and the long-term impacts on the City's Operating Budget. . Eliminate or reduce the potential for health hazards or increase the safety and general welfare of the City. . Take advantage of economies of scale. . Leverage local money to secure outside funding sources. . Address higher Council priorities for capital improvement and maintenance. . Address special Council targets. TABLE II DEFINITIONS OF PROJECT CATEGORIES The following list of categories is the means by which the CIP has been organized for review. The titles are meant to be descriptive of the primary purpose ofthe projects in that category. Projects may serve functions of more than one category. For example, a NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT project may also include work described under TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT or PRESERVATION PROJECTS, but will only be listed in the primary category. Additionally, projects in any category may include projects that are growth related and eligible for funding with Systems Development Charge (SDC) funds. DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS - includes projects that primarily serve specific developing commercial and industrial lands, which the City has designated for future growth in the Metro Plan, or projects that generally promote economic activity in the City. Also, they may include capacity enhancement projects such a~ collector or arterial street improvements or a new Fire Station. Schedule I shows this category divided into project work and debt service of previously constructed projects, financed with bonds other than general obligation bonds. JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY - consists of design and construction of the justice center facility approved by voters in 2004, under measure 20-91. The project will be financed with general obligation bonds and will house police, court and municipal jail facpities. Operations will be funded per measure 20-112, so jail facilities will be constructed. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS - includes the small projects primarily improving individual neighborhoods. These projects may be funded by local assessment districts, if they are proj ects proposed by property owners for improvement of City street facilities. PRESERVATION PROJECTS - includes projects whose primary purpose is to extend the useful life or expand the capacity of existing facilities. Usually these facilities have exceeded their life expectancies or design capacities and are in need of various extents of preservation or rehabilitation. This category also includes projects that add to or modify existing facilities and do not fit into the other categories. TRANSPORT A TION SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT - includes projects intended primarily to improve traffic safety, relieve traffic congestion, provide additional traffic capacity, and improve traffic circulation. 11 TABLE III GLOSSARY OF FUNDING SOURCES ASSESSMENTS CURRENT REVENUES 427-SDC (OLD) 447-SDC (TRANS, Improvement) 446-SDC (TRANS, Reimbursement) 443-SDC (SAN, Improvement) 442-SDC (SAN, Reimbursement) 440-SDC (STORM, Improvement) 409-Local Wastewater Capital 425-Drainage Capital 434-STREET Capital BOOTH KELLY RESERVE GRANTS AND DONATIONS CDBG STpl EDA UNDETER ODOT1 LC1 OTHER REVENUE BOND CAPITAL BOND DEVELOPER OTHER I These funds may not pass through the City budget. Assessments on benefitting properties. System Development Charge (SDC) funds collected under SDC laws in effect prior to 1991 which have different restrictions on use than current SDCs. SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the transportation system. SDC funds collected from development to reimburse for existing transportation system capacity used by the development. SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system. SDC funds collected from development to reimburse for existing capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system used by the development. SDCfunds collected from development to increase capacity of the storm drainage collection system. Sewer user fees for sanitary sewer expansion, extension, and repair. Sewer user fees for drainage system expansion, extension, and repair. Funds received from State and local fuel taxes, from Lane County (urban transition), and other sources to be used for road purposes. Funds received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center. Community Development Block Grant Federal Surface Transportation Program Federal Economic Development Assistance As yet unidentified Federal Grant Oregon Department of Transportation Lane County Road Fund Long-term obligation secured by ongoing revenues such as Sewer User fees General Obligation Debt issued with approval of the voters Direct contributions from developers Undefined funding source 111 SCHEDULE I 2008 TO 2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY ., - - .. .., ....,.. ,. .. , '..... .... ,... ..., ..... .... ... " . . .",. . .,,, '.. . ..... '1))> CATEGORY ><2001-2000:" '2008~2009:),: :::::20Q9t2()1 0 ...... /201022011' Dl ::I: .... . ".. ."..... 10 Dl CD 0 DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS m:::r O~ .... ::::J 1,235,000 653,000 7,612,150 01~ PROJECTS 3,219,800 1,032,350 1,472,000 (0)> DEBT SERVICES 718,000 718,000 718,000 718,000 718,000 3,590,000 JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY 100,000 25,000 125,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 75,000 50,000 390,000 280,000 10,000 805,000 PRESERVATION 3,696,982 2,400,000 2,170,000 2,067,998 2,432,000 12,766,980 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT 650,000 700,000 675,000 902,000 340,000 3,267,000 TOTAL 8,459,782 4,925,350 5,425,000 5,202,998 4,153,000 28,166,130 Page iv SCHEDULE II 2008 TO 2012 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Ii ~ n ~~ ~a g:" ASSESSMENTS I 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 01 01 0 CURRENT REVENUES SDC (OLD) 420 103,095 240,611 253,782 4496 40 000 2,721 40 000 857 17 998 0 0 351 780 351 780 0 SDC (TRANS IMPROV) 447 245 100 750,000 944 800 750 000 777,700 700 000 535 000 600 000 787 000 800 000 600 000 3645 100 3 644 500 600 SDC (TRANS REIMBUR) 446 329975 200,000 375 025 200 000 150,975 150,000 237 325 100,000 207 325 100 000 109,325 1 079 975 1 079 975 0 SDC (SANITARY IMPROV) 443 213000 50 000 208 000 50,000 98 000 25 000 32 000 25 000 5000 25,000 45 000 388,000 388 000 0 SDC (SANITARY REIMBUR) 442 154675 150 000 244 325 150,000 209 325 150 000 92 325 150,000 162325 100 000 146 325 854 675 854 625 50 SDC (STORM) 440 944 650 450 000 654 350 450 000 346,350 450 000 872 350 495,000 614350 200 000 301 350 2 989 650 2,988 750 900 DRAINAGE CAPITAL 425 407 000 340 000 746 500 820 000 545,000 820,000 673,000 620 000 623,000 620 000 639 000 3 227,000 3 226 500 500 WASTEWATER CAPITAL 409 2729 2106000 2 108 000 2,106000 1 808,000 2 106,000 2,343 000 2,106000 2161 000 2,106,000 2112,000 10532729 10532000 729 STREET CAPITAL 434 225 000 625 000 650 000 500,000 675 000 400 000 400 000 250,000 250 000 175 000 200,000 2 175,000 2 175 000 0 BOOTH-KELLY RESERVE 618 1 219855 704 000 65 000 0 50 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 923 855 115,000 1 808,855 Sub-totals: 3,845 079 5615611 6 249 782 4,830,496 4 700 350 4 603 721 5 225 000 4 346 857 5,027 998 3 926 000 4153000 27167764 25 356,130 18116341 GRANTS & DONATIONS CDBG.. 210 LANE COUNTY. 420 ODOT" 420 FEDERAL GRANT" 420 1 00 000 100 000 100,000 100000 0 WILLAMALANE 420 0 Sub-totals: 0 100000 100 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 000 100,000 0 OTHER CAPITAL BOND 428 100000 100,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 125 000 125 000 0 OTHER 420 1 810000 1 810000 0 0 0 1810000 1 810000 0 DEVELOPER 420 200 000 200 000 200 000 200 000 200 000 200 000 175 000 175000 0 0 775 000 775 000 0 Sub-totals: 0 2110000 2,110000 225 000 225 000 200 000 200,000 175 000 175 000 0 0 2710000 2,710000 0 Grand Totals: 3,845,079 7,825,611 8,459,782 5,055,496 4,925,350 4,803,721 5,425,000 4,521,857 5,202,998 3,926,000 4,153,000 29,977,764 28,166,130 1,811,634 "These funds may not pass through the City's budget. ".Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are Identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not Included. Page v SCHEDULE III - A PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 -u)> Ol::: CDOl m 0 roOT O~ -" Ul~ ro)> PAGElm":::< .'. nr>n~,)y,::;::: SDC. 'IYSDCTRANSPORTA TION SDCSANITARY J S[lC ... DRAINAGE. WA~;r~WAT~~ STREET :~:P~6+~~r.:.'.' . ",...., ..............". No. "". ,.:....." .........:.......... .' OLD 'IM~ROVMTI. ..:REiMBliRS" IMP~OVMT .. RE:.IM.BURS J' STORM .. ... CAPITAL CAPITAL." . Y..:cAPiTAL: DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 3,937,800 - 1-1 Debt Service. SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 98,000 538,000 636,000 - 1-3 City Participation, Private projecte 50,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 300,000 14 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 - 1-8 Gray-Jaqua Agreement 50,000 71,500 53,500 130,000 305,000 - 1-9 Jasper Road Sewer Extension 60,000 130,000 210,000 400,000 - 1-10 Federal Office Building Bank Loan - r- 1,810,000 1,810,000 - 1-11 Bob Straub IGA 344,800 - 35,000 379,800 JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY Category Total 100,000 Ii=1l Justice Center Facility I I I Bond -.. 100,000 100,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 75,000 ~ Transportation Demand Project 50,000 I I I 50,000 11I-2 Major Sidewalk Construction and Preservation I I I 25,000 25,000 PRESERVATION Category Total 3,696,982 I--- IV-1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 f--- IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 1,055,000 1,055,000 I--- IV-3 Metro Waterways Study 100,000 . 100,000 I--- IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 f--- IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 f--- IV-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 25,000 I--- IV-7 Riparian Land ManagmUAcquisitlons 37,000 13,000 50,000 f--- IV-8 Millrace Water Control Structure 280,500 Exist City Fds. --+ 100,000 380,500 I--- IV-9 City Building Maintenance 173,782 173,782 f--- IV-10 Booth Kelly Drainage Master Plan II Booth Kelly Fund_ 50,000 50,000 I--- IV-11 Street light In-FiII/Pole Replacement 50,000 50,000 I--- IV-12 Street Seal/Overlay - 87,700 150,000 237,700 I--- IV-13 5th Street Overlay 200,000 400,000 600,000 '-- IV-14 Wood stave Removal 50,000 50,000 - IV-15 Firehouse Wash rack 120,000 120,000 I--- IV-16 BK Building Removal Booth Kelly Fund -. 15,000 15,000 I-- IV-17 Minor City Facilities 80,000 80,000 I--- IV-19 Vehicle Wash Rack 250,000 250,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 650,000 '-------- V-1 Traffic Control Projecte 100,000 100,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improve mente 250,000 250,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 , 50,000 - V-4 BeltlinelGateway intersection Developer_ 200,000 200,000 - V-5 Pioneer Parkway. Lighting 25,000 25,000 I 50,000 SCHEDULE III - A TOTAL 253,782 944,800 375,025 208,000 244,325 654,350 I 746,5001 2,108,000 650,000 I 2,275,000 8,459,782 Page vi SCHEDULE III - B PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 "l))> "'~ "" "' 11I 0 co:T O~ -" ",- 0>)> PA<;~ 1:;:\ ......... ",;"P'~?tECTS :'1\ SDC . ,I '.' SDCT~NSPORTATION..' "'...,S[)C SANITARY, ,....,.., .SDC DRAINAGE WATEWATER . '" STREET' ..I<.VI n~"JPROJECT ."..,,,.. ,. No..... ....,.. <q..... ... . .' ..... OLD ,IiMPROVMt REIMBURS '.q IIMPFU)"/vlT ,.IREiMBURS' . . STORM' "", CAPITAl.. CAPITAL" CAPITAl.. ": '. ....'.'. .... ,'.' . : TOTAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1,750,350 - 1-1 Debt Service - SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 98,000 538,000 636,000 - 1-3 City Participation, Private Projec,ts 50,000 38,650 50,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 288,650 - 1-4 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 - 1-5 Future Growth Projects 54,000 72,000 126,00~ - 1-8 Gray-Jaqua Agreement 50,000 70,000 125,000 245,00~ - 1-9 Jasper Road Sewer Extension 195,000 195,000 - 1-11 Bob Straub IGA 152,700 152,700 JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY 25,000 'IiTl Justice Center Facility 1 I I Bond-- 25,000 25,OO~ NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 50,000 ---m-1l ' Transportation Demand Project 1 50,000 I T I 1 I 50,000 PRESERVATION Category Total 2,400,000 !----- IV-1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 f------- IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 900,000 900,000 f------- IV-3 Metro Waterways Study 100,000 100,000 f------- IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 f--- IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 - 25,OOC IV-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 - IV-7 Riparian Land ManagmtlAcqulsltlons 37,000 13,000 50,OO~ - IV-9 City Building Maintenance 40,000 40,000 - IV-11 Street Light In-flll/Pole Replacement 25,000 25,000 - IV-12 Straet Saal/Overlay 100,000 600,000 700,000 - IV-14 Woodstave Removal 50,000 50,000 - -- IV-16 BK Building Removal Booth Kelly Fund 50,000 50,000 . .. . .,'. TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 700,000 - V-1 Traffic Control Projects 100,000 100,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 250,000 250,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 - V-4 Beltllne/Gateway Intersection Developer_ 200,000 200,000 - . V-5 Pioneer Parkway Lighting 50,000 50,000 100,000 SCHEDULE III - B TOTAL 40,000 777,700 150,9751 98,000 209,325 346,350 545,000 1,808,000 675,000 275,000 4,925,350 Page vii SCHEDULE III - C PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 ~~ "'Ill CD 0 ~ :T 03 OCD -" g;; rAG~I::'i::>:m"""':':"~ SOC.. I sac TRANSPORTATiON" SDCSANITARY' ::::>.1:" ~RAINAGE '~b~Ep7r~~E'N!I:::::~~=I~~1.: i!.I:!i:ii!r9" PROJECT/. OLD/ JREIMBURS . ,."'.0,..,.... ....""......... IMPROVMT IMPROVMT REIMBURS . ".1' ,CAPITAL TOTAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 2,190,000 - 1-1 Debt Service - SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 636,000 636,000 - 1-3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 75,000 50,000 25,000 320,000 - 1-5 Future Growth Projects 200,000 200,000 400,OO( - 1-8 Gray-.laqua Agreement 50,000 125,000 300,000 475,000 - 1-9 Jasper Road Sewer Extension 12,000 265,000 277 ,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 390,000 - 11I-1 Transportation Demand Project 10,000 10,000 - 11I-3 54th and J Drainage 300,000 300,OOl - 11I-4 S& T St Drainage 80,000 80,OOl PRESERVATION . Category Tota/ 2,170,000 - IV-1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 3,000 197,000 200,000 - IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 920,000 920,000 - IV-3 Metro Waterways Study 100,000 100,000 - IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 - IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 - IV-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 25,OOl - IV-7 Riparian Land ManagmtlAcquisitlons 37,000 13,000 50,001 - ~ City Building Maintenance 40,000 40,000 ~ Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement 25,000 25,000 IV-12 Street SeallOverlay 175,000 325,000 500,000 - IV-14 Wood stave Removal 50,000 50,000 ." .. .. ... . TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 675,000 - V-1 Traffic Control Projects 75,000 75,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 250,000 250,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 - V-4 Beltline/Gateway Intersection Developer_ 200,000 200,000 I---- V-5 Pioneer Parkway Lighting 50,000 50,000 100,000 SCHEDULE III - C TOTAL I 40,000 535,000 237,3251 32,000 92,3251 872,350 T 673,000 2,343,000 400,000 I 200,000 5,425,000 Page viii SCHEDULE III - 0 PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-11 PAGE ..i........ .. .SDC" 'tSOC TRANSPORTATION ...1'.. SDC SANITAR". :.1: SDC :P.RAINA~E .WATEWATER ....S'T.~EET . ... .. . .. .......... ......l .....-....",,-.. ........., . . .:..I...........'"'.....r.~...::..:... ...:....PROJECT No. ...... ... ...:.......::..m . .oLo' IMPROVMT REIMBURS. . IMPROVMT::. .. REIMBURS.. STORM' . cAPiTAL .. CAPITAL" CAPITAL ..... I." TOTAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1,953,000 - 1-1 Debt Service - SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 636,000 636.000 - . 1-3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 5,000 50,000 75.000 50.000 25,000 255,000 ----'- 1-5 Future Growth Projects 252,000 275,000 527,000 - 1-9 Jasper Road Sewer Extension 453.000 453,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 280,000 ~ Transportation Demand Project 10,000 . I 10,000 11I-4 S& T St Drainage 270,000 I 270,00C "U}> PRESERVATION Category Total 2,067,998 0>::10 - 100> IV-1 Sanltery Sewer Repair 3,000 197,000 200,000 CD 0 ~ :T - ~3 IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 70,000 850,000 920,000 OCD -a - g:}> IV-3 Metro Waterways Study 100,000 100,000 - IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 - IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 - 25,00C IV-6 MS4 Penn it Requirements 25,000 - (V-7 Riparian land ManagmtlAcquisitlons 37,000 13.000 50 ,DOC I--- IV-9 City Building Maintenance 17 ,998 17.998 - IV-11 Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement 45,000 45,000 - IV-12 Street Seal/Overlay 195,000 105,000 300,000 ~ 50 ,DOC IV-14 Wood stave Removal 50,000 r-- 100,00C IV-18 21st Street Reconstruction 100,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total - V-1 Traffic Control Projects 75,000 75,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 242,000 242,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 - V-6 S 48th St Connection Main to Daisy 360,000 Develope"-" 175,000 535,000 SCHEDULE III . 0 TOTAL I 17,998 787,000 207,325 5,000 162,325 814,350 623,000 2,161,000 250,000 175,000 5,202,998 Pageix SCHEDULE III - E PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12 "'0)- w"" lOW '" 0 ~::T "'3 0'" _:l g:; PAGE . .. PROJECTS .. SDC I... ..... SDC TRANSPORTATION. .....1 i.' SDC SANI;TARYH mIH!'S~DC '..m DRAINAGE 'f'!ATEW~TER,. STREEr PROJECT "1" No, . ..' 'm OLD 'IMPROVM.!.: I REIMBURS. IMPR()VMT: REIMBURS ...~lT()RM;i ,'.mCAPI1AL .m.CAPITAL C:APrrAL I....m TOTAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1,371,000 - 1-1 Debt Service - SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 636,000 636,000 - 1-3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 50,000 75,000 60,000 25,000 . 250,000 - 1-5 Future Growth Projects 0 9,000 291 ,000 300,000 - 1-9 Jasper Road Sewer Extension 45,000 $ 54,000 4,000 103,000 - NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1~1 m=1l Transportation Demand Project 10,0001 I I 10 PRESERVATION Category Total 2'4S1 - IV-1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 3,000 197,000 200.0ll0 - 1,250,000 IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 1,250,000 - IV-3 Metro Waterways Study 100,000 100,000 f--- IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 f--- IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 f--- 1V-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 25,001 I--- 50,OOC IV-7 Riparian Land ManagmtlAcquisitlons 37,000 13,000 I--- IV-11 Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement 40,000 40,000 I--- IV-12 Street SeallOverlay 97,000 160,000 257,000 I--- 50,001 IV-14 Wood stave Removal 50,000 I--- 200,001 IV-18 21 st Street Reconstruction 200,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 340,000 I--- V-1 Traffic Control Projects 75,000 75,000 I--- V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 215,000 215,000 I--- V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 SCHEDULE III - E TOTAL! 0 600,000 109,325 45,000 146,325 301,350 639,000 2,112,000 200,000 0 4,153,00U Page x '"0)> 0> ~ co ~ CD ~ .....:::r w3 o CD -..:J 01~ m)> DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $410,000 Total Cost Street & Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram. N/A Project Number -u)> Dl ::I: to Dl CD 0 --" -::r """3 aCD ....,:J g:): PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - .$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other (Debt) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 410,000 TOTAL $ - $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 410,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Sanitary, Reimbursement $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 196,625 SDC Storm $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 151,750 SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 61,625 TOTAL $ - $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 410,000 Project Description: Oregon Special Public Works payment on a loan for a portion of the public improvements in the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park. The total loan amount is $952,309 and is to be paid over a 20 year period. Last payment will be in 2014. Justification: The loan and repayment of the loan was approved by Council in 1994. Maintenance Impacts: . No maintenance impact related to the debt service. Page/-1 -0)> W ;::I: (C W m (") ..... :::r 013 Om ....::1 g;; City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $3,180,000.00 Total Cost N/A Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other (Debt) $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 3,180,000 TOTAL $ - $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 3,180,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Sanitary, Improvement $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 196,000 Drainage User $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater User $ 538,000 $ 538,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 2,984,000 TOTAL $ - $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 3,180,000 Project Description: Annual payment of 20 year revenue bonds and State Revolving Fund loan to fund the South Springfield Interceptor. Last Payment Date: Phase I 2/1/2014 Phase II 12/1/2015 Phase III 7/1/2011 A portion of the South Springfield Interceptor sewer was funded with loans and bonds amortized over a 20 year period. The SRF loan of $1 ,075,000 for Phase 1 resulted in an annual payment of $75,000. In Phase II, the $3.3 million revenue bond sold in 1995 resulted in an annual payment of $285,000. The payment on the $2,900,000 DEQ Revolving Loan for Phase III in FY 1997/98 equals $300,000 per year. , Relation to Plans: Consideration of the bond repayment was anticipated when setting the current sewer user rates. All loans and bonds were approved by Council. Maintenance Impacts: No maintenance impact related to the debt service. Page I - 2 City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category City Participation, Private Projects Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,413,650 Total Cost Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ~}> 1O::t: CD 0 =r m3 O~ -. .-+ 01}> OJ ~KIUK Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ . - Construction $ 300,000 $ 288,650 $ 320',00'0 $ 255,00'0 $ 250,00'0 $ 1,413,650' Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 300,0'00 $ 288,650 $ 320,000 $ 255,0'0'0' $ 250,0'00 $ 1,413,650' Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 75,0'0'0' $ 38,650' $ 50,0'00' $ - $ - $ 163,650 SDC Trans, Improvement $ 50,0'00 $ 50',0'00 $ 50,0'00 $ 50,00'0 $ 50,00'0' $ 250',000 SDC San, Reimbursement $ 25,0'00 $ 50',0'00 $ 50',0'00 $ 50',0'0'0 $ 50,0'0'0' $ 225,0'0'0 SDC San, Improvement $ 50,0'0'0' $ - $ 20',000 $ 5,0'0'0' $ - $ 75,0'0'0' SDC Storm $ 50,0'00' $ 75,0'00' $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,0'00 $ 350',0'0'0' Drainage Capital $ 25,000 $ 50',0'00 $ 50',0'00 $ 50',000' $ 50,0'0'0 $ 225,00'0' Wastewater Capital $ 25,0'0'0' $ 25,0'0'0' $ 25,0'00' $ 25,00'0' $ 25,0'0'0 $ 125,0'0'0' TOTAL $ - $ 300,0'00 $ 288,650 $ 320',0'00 $ 255,000 $ 250',0'0'0' $ 1,413,650' Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City's Construction Permit process. Currently $25,0'0'0' of Transportation reimbursement funds are programed in 2006-20'0'7 for the City's obligation in the Weichert annexation agreement. Currently other programmed funds are not yet tied to specific projects Justification: In many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage and/or streets beyond a size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid by the City under Council adopted participation policies. Relation to Plans: City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance impacts are dependent on the individual projects funded. Often this funding is used to upsize a sewer or storm drainage line and sometimes to improve a street's structure and length and the maintenance impacts are minimal. Page/-3 Transportation Manager Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Franklin Blvd Plannning Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $350,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number -0)> w ~ co w CD 0 -" :r --.J3 OCD -~ ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 250,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Construction . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Funding Source(s) SDC-Trans, Improvement $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 SDC- Trans, Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - STP-U $ 175,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 LTD $ 25,000 . TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Project Description: Complete a planning study to determine future improvements to Franklin Boulevard and the Mcvay/Franklin intersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional traffic. Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, access, and intersections. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and anticipates redevelopment by the Springfield Economic Development Agency. Relation to Plans: TransPlan future project list for urban standards and intersection improvements. Council top priority. Maintenance Impacts: This is an ODOT Highway and if the road stays in State ownership the impact of improvement on City maintenance could be minimal. If the State does not take responsibility for street amenities outside the curbs, then improvements to landscaping, sidewalks, etc. may need to be maintained by the City. The proposed funding is for planning and has no direct maintenance impact. Maintenance considerations need to be included in the planning process. Page I - 4 ""0)> ~.~ Ol OJ o -" :::r 003 OOl ....:3 ~; City Engineer Project Manager Future Growth Projects Project Title Development Improvement Project Category Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,353,000 Total Cost Street & Sewer Capital Project Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 - 2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ 126,000 $ 400,000 $ 527,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,353,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ - $ 126,000 $ 400,000 $ 527,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,353,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDCTrans, Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Street Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDC Storm $ - $ 54,000 $ 200,000 $ 252,000 $ 9,000 $ 515,000 Drainage Capital $ - $ 72,000 $ 200,000 $ 275,000 $ 291,000 $ 838,000 Wastewater Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ - $ 126,000 $ 400,000 $ 527,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,353,000 Project Description: The amounts of funding listed each year represent the unprogrammed funds based on revenue projections over the 5 year CIP period. These funds will be programmed to specific projects as they are identified and as project budgets are refined. Justification: State law regulates the way cities can expend SDC funds and requires that the funds be expended only on projects listed on the SDC-eligible project list. Relation to Plans: ThisJunding is not programmed, but can be used for growth-related projects identified in the Council adopted System Development Charge project list. The projects can be programmed as development pressures increase infrastructure needs in various areas of the City or to jump-start development in selected opportunity areas. . Maintenance Impacts: . The projects to be funded with this unprogrammed revenue have not been selected. Typically, this funding is to provide new infrastructure to support growth and new infrastructure always has a maintenance impact. Page I - 5 City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement I:'roject Category Gray Jaqua Agreement Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,150,000 Total Cost N/A Street, Sewer, Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number ""0)> III :+ 10 III (I) 0 --" ::r (03 0(1) _:J - g;)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 125,000 $ 305,000 $ 245,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ 1,025,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 125,000 $ 305,000 $ 245,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ 1,025,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Transprotation Improv $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 Drainage Capital $ 125,000 $ 53,500 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 303,500 SDC Storm $ 71,500 $ 71,500 SDC Sanitary Reimbursement $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 Wastewater Capital $ 130,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 430,000 TOTAL $ 125,000 $ 305,000 $ 245,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ 1,025,000 Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed pursuant to the Pre-Development Agreement for the Gray-Jaqua Property located at S. 75th and Main Streets. / wH1. 1'10. i U.P. Ilo.23 Justification: An agreement with Heritage Park, LLC was made in 2005 for development of 215 acres. The agreement would establish the City's participation at a total of $1 ,150,000 for off-site and/or contiguous sewer and drainage improvements, and 1/6th of the cost of transportation improvements in Main Street. ST. GRJ'Y JAQUA ENT Relation to Plans: Pending agreement with Developer. Per the Agreement, the City's share of the funding would be fully programmed by FY2009/2010. Maintenance Impacts: Sewer and drainage improvements would be maintained by the City. Since Main Street is an ODOT facility, the impact of the street improvements on City maintenance costs should be minimal. Page I - 6 City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category $4,800,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Sewer Extension, Jasper Road Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet P20353 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 Construction $ 2,728,000 $ - $ 195,000 $ 277,000 $ 453,000 $ 103,000 $ 1,028,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 3,228,000 $ 400,000 $ 195,000 $ 277,000 $ 453,000 $ 103,000 $ 1,428,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Sanitary Reimbursement $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 54,000- $ 184,000 SDC Sanitary Improvement $ 60,000 $ - $ 12,000 $ - $ 45,000 $ 117,000 SDC Storm $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 611,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Capital $ 217,000 $ 210,000 $ 195,000 $ 265,000 $ 453,000 $ 4,000 $ 1,127,000 Developer $ 2,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 3,228,000 $ 400,000 $ 195,000 $ 277,000 $ 453,000 $ 103,000 $ 1,428,000 "U)> w ~ (Q W CD 0 N-=r 03 OCD -.,::1 ~; Project Description: Installation of 18,000 feet of 27- to 10-inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from 42nd Street to Natron and the urban growth boundary. We are building reserve for the City's portion of the project funding, the remaining funding will be collected through a developer's contributions and SDC fees. Justification: The Jasper sewer extension project will provide sewer service to areas of the urban fringe which are currently not s~rviced. The Jasper Road Extension project from 57th and Main Street to Brand S Road and proposals for residential and industrial development in this area will stimulate the need for sewers. 50% of project costs are proposed to be funded with City funds, with the balance to be funded through grants, developer contributions, or assessments. Decommissioning of two existing pump stations is included in this project. ./~ L "~~~;@:;;~~">;g,,: .. \\ Relation to Plans: Springfield Sanitary Sewer Master Plan (update is expected to be complete by the end of FY07). Furthers the Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the high priority target of Jasper Natron development. Maintenance Impacts: Sewer system expansion will cause additional maintenance impact. Decommissioning the 2 pump stations will reduce maintenance and power costs. Paget-7 "U)> w ::+ 10 w CD (1 ",::r --"3 OCD -;:!. ~)> Finance Director Development Improvement Federal Office Building Capital Project Manager Project Category Project Title Improvement Projects $ 1,810,000 N/A N/A Sheet Total Cost Budget Subprogram Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - Design and Engineering $ 590,000 $ - $ - Construction $ 3,500,000 $ 1,810,000 $ - $ 1,810,000 Other $ - TOTAL $ 4,090,000 $ 1,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,810,000 Funding Source(s) Other $ 4,090,000 $ 1,810,000 $ - $ 1,810,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 4,090,000 $ 1,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ : $ 1,810,000 Project Description: This project will assist in the construction of a consolidated office facility for Bureau of Land Management in cooperation with the US Forest Service and Oregon Department of the Military (National Guard). The City will execute a bank loan for the entire project cost, with the debt service secured by the collection of lease revenue from a 1 O-year lease to the BLM. The building will be located on land owned by the Department of the Military and the a tenancy-in-common agreement held with the City for the site of the BLM facility. Justification: These agencies are hoping to consolidate office facilities to increase operating efficiency. City of Springfield has agreed to facilitate construction within City limits. Relation to Plans: This building addresses the facility plans of these agencies and conforms to Springfield Land Use Plans. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance of this facility will be conducted through contract services completely paid for by rents collected from the agencies occupying the facility. Page I - 8 City Engineer Project Manager Devlopment Improvement Project Category Bob Straub IGA wI Lane County Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $532,500 Total Cost Street, Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number J/)> 1C::t: m 0 N"J" N3 O~ -. - ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - Construction $ 379,800 $ 152,700 $ 532,500 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 379,800 $ 152,700 $ - $ - $ - $ 532,500 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 344,800 $ 152,700 $ 497,500 SDC Storm $ 35,000 $ 35,000 TOTAL $ - $ 379,800 $ 152,700 $ - $ - $ - $ 532,500 Project Description: This funding is set aside as part of an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County to upsize some of the storm drainage structures and install additional conduit for future transportation needs. It also allows for some extra paving to accomodate future intersections. The IGA is being finalized with Lane County and will be brought to the City Council for approval later this year. Justification: The addition of this work to that already scheduled by Lane County will better facilitate future growth in the Jasper/Natron area while avoiding major reconfigurations later. Relation to Plans: Furthers the Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the high priority target of Jasper Natron development. Maintenance Impacts: This work should have minimal impacts on future maintenace, but should allow for growth without major reconfigurations. Page I - 9 ""0)> OJ .-+ (0'-+ C'D ~ . ::J ~3 o C'D _::I ~; JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY Page /I - 1 Assistant City Manager Project Manager Justice Center Facility Project Category $28,249,650 Total Cost N/A Budget Subprogram Justice Center Facility Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet P50434 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 100,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 Construction $ 24,065,136 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 1,283,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - . TOTAL $ 25,348,136 $ 100,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 Funding Source(s) Bond Measure 20-91 $ 25,348,136 $ 100,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 TOTAL $ 25,348136 $ 100 000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 '"0):- III :::t: lOW CD 0 N::T .1'>3 OCD ....::J ~): Project Description: This project includes the construction of a replacement facility for the Police Department, Municipal Court and City Prosecutor's Office. Construction is expected to start in the in Spring 2007. Justification: This facility will provide updated space for Police Department patrol, investigation, dispatch, record keeping and administration. It will also house municipal court, prosecutor and jail functions, and provide a public meeting space. The current facilities are outdated and do not meet current needs. Relation to Plans: c Conforms to Council initiated bond measure 20-91, in November 2004. Maintenance Impacts: When completed, the facility will be maintained by the City. During the design process, decisions will made in consideration of both initial construction cost and ongoing maintenance costs. - ""'0)> Q) .-.. (0 .-.. CD ~ N:Y <J13 o CD -.::J <J1'-" 0:>)> NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS ""0)> m ~ 10m CD (') I\)::T 0>3 OCD ....~ g;; Transportation Manager Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category Transportation Demand Project Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $240,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 . 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 Construction $ 55,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 Other $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 1 0,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 110,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 130,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 110,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 130,000 TOTAL $ 110,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 130,000 Project Description: This project covers the Commuter Solutions Program local match, and partnering on transportation options projects in the Gateway area to address congestion. The project also includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-auto travel links in the community like the E. 14th multi-use path in Glenwood and park and ride facilities coordinated with transit stations. Justification: TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TOM), or 'transportation options' policies and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessary to meet those requirements. Relation to Plans: TOM Goal, policies and projects in TransPlan. Maintenance Impacts: Reduces road maintenance costs by reducing vehicle miles traveled. Some maintenance costs associated with the construction of separate multi-use paths Page III - 1 Transportation Manager Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category Major Sidewalk Construction And Preservation Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $25,000 Total Cost N/A Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram Project Number '"0)> III ::; 10 III CD (') N::T --J3 OCD ....::1 g:; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ , 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Funding Source(s) S~reet Capital $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 TOTAL $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Project Description: Major sidewalk construction and preservation projects as identified by citizens or based on needs as identified by City staff. This may include installation of new sidewalk sections to provide in-fill between existing sidewalk segments, replacement of damaged sidewalks or installation of ADA ramps. Justification: There is a need for sidewalk installation to provide interconnects between existing segments of sidewalk. This is especially true in many of the older neighborhoods and the downtown core. There are also several areas where extensive sections of existing sidewalk are in need of major rehabilitaion and upgrading to current standards. Relation to Plans: Projects are either requested by citizens or identified by City staff. Maintenance Impacts: Will add maintenance costs to provide upkeep for the selected installation, which has not yet been selected. May reduce ongoing reduce ongoing r'naintenace costs Page 1/1 - 2 City Engineer Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category $300,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram 54th & J Drainage Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet P20266 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ 30,000 Construction $ - $ - $ 270,000 $ - $ - $ 270,000 Other $ $ $ ~ ~ - $ $ $ TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 "'0)> W ::t: lOW Funding Source(s) Cll 0 I\J~ CX>3 SDC Storm $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 Ocll -~ TOTAL $ $ $ $ 300,000 $ $ $ 300,000 g:)> - - - - - Project Description: Construction of a channel and storm sewer along the north side of Highway 126 between 52nd and 54th Streets. Justification: This project will provide drainage service consistent with current storm water quality standards to an incorporated section of the City bounded by Highbanks Road, 52nd Street, and Highway 126. Relation to Plans: Provides trunk drainage service to developed and undeveloped areas which will encourage in-fill development. The update Stormwater Facilities Master Plan is expected by the end of FY07 Maintenance Impacts: Construction of this new facility will add a minor amount of maintenance effort and cost. Page IfI - 3 ""0)> w ~ 10 W CD 0 N:::r w3 OCD -.:J ~;: City Engineer Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category S & T Street Drainage Between 10th & Debra Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $350,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 . 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ 56,000 $ - $ 56,000 Construction $ - $ - $ 24,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 294,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 350,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Storm $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 350,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 350,000 Project Description: Construction of a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along T and S Streets between 10th and Debra Streets. Justification: Will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the S Street area. Relation to Plans: This drainage system was identified as undersized in the SCS Channel NO.6 report. Maintenance Impacts: Construction of this facility will add some maintenance effort and cost, but should reduce some expenditures related to existing localized flooding. Page 111 - 4 "0)> OJ ..... (0..... CD ~ w::J" 03 o CD _:J ~; PRESERVATION PROJECTS City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Sanitary Sewer Repair Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,340,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number -0)> Il) ::I: lOll) CD 0 (,.):T ......3 OCD -.:::1 &l; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Construction $ 340,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 900,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 340,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Funding Source(s) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Capital $ 245,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 197,000 $ 197,000 $ 197,000 $ 891,000 SDC San, Reimbursement $ 95,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 109,000 TOTAL $ 340,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Project Description: This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers other than those being rehabilitated under the formal Wet Weather Flow Management Plan being done in cooperation with MWMC (see sheet IV-2). Justification: The project will repair and/or replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life or is otherwise causing problems within the collection system. Relation to Plans: The projects selected will be chosen not only to remove infiltration and inflow, but to replace aging lines which cause maintenance or other problems. Maintenance Impacts: The amount of funding available for repair and replacement of sanitary sewers in this program and within the Wet Weather Flow Management program will keep the system in a steady state of repair. However, we have an aging sewer system infrastructure and the overall condition of the system is not expected to improve significantly with this level of funding. Therefore, these programs help keep maintenance needs for the existing system static, while expansion of the system causes an added maintenance impact. Page IV - 1 City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $5,645,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0):- III ::+ to III m 0 w=r N3 Om _:J g:): PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 80,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 $ 90,000 $ 380,000 Construction $ 600,000 $ 975,000 $ 830,000 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 4,665,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 1,055,000 $ 900,000 $ 920,000 $ 920,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,045,000 Funding Source(s) SDC San, Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 Drainage Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Capital $ 600,000 $ 1,055,000 $ 900,000 $ 920,000 $ 850,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 4,975,000 TOTAL $ 600,000 $ 1,055,000 $ 900,000 $ 920,000 $ 920,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,045,000 Project Description: The cities of Eugene and Springfield are currently cooperating in a Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) dealing with excess infiltration and inflow of rain and ground water into the sanitary sewer system. The plan is in the sixth year of the planned ten year implementation schedule. Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities in the most cost-effective manner identified by the plan. Relation to Plans: The WWFM plan will guide the use of these funds. Maintenance Impacts: The amount of funding available for repair and replacement of sanitary sewers in this program and within the Sanitary Sewer Repair program will keep the system in a steady state of repair. However, we have an aging sewer system infrastructure and the overall condition of the system is not expected to improve significantly with this level of funding. Therefore, these programs help keep maintenance needs for the existing system static, while expansion of the system causes an added maintenance impact. Page IV - 2 -0)> Il) ~ lOll) m 0 w::r w3 Om _:J g;; Maintenance Division Project Manager Preservation Project Category Metro Waterways Study Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $700,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram P50388 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2009 - 2010 2010-2011 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - O.ther $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 FundingSource(s) SDC Storm $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 Project Description: Springfield is participating along with Eugene and Lane County in an Army Corps of Engineers General Investigation Study authorized under the Water Resources Development Act. Springfield's share (25%) of this approximately $3,500,000 project is $875,000. The current project is a feasibility study necessary to identify future water quality projects within the Eugene/Springfield metropolitan watershed. The Cedar Creek Drainage Basin has been identified as Springfield's highest priority study area. The $100,000 slated annually for five years beginning FY 03/04 is about 45% of the City's required match. Other CIP projects, such as Channel Improvements, Floodplain Mapping and McKenzie Oxbow will qualify as in-kind match and satisfy the balance of the local obligation. Justification: This planning study will assist the City in future years to gain access to federal funding (similar to the Mill Race funding) for capital improvement projects that address drainage capacity, water quality, and flood control. Relation to Plans: This project relates to many plans affecting land use and public facilities throughout the Metro Area. Examples in Springfield include the Stormwater Management Plan, under development to meet Clean Water Act requirements, and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This is a planning project and has no direct maintenance impact until projects are selected. Page IV - 3 City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Drainage Repair Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,120,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U)> Dl ~ 10 Dl m (1 w:J" ""'3 Om .....::1 .... g:)> .' PRIUR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Construction $ 120,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 900,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 120,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 750,000 SDC Storm $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Project Description: This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace older pipe in the system and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe. Projects include: Construct headwall on 69th St. Canal at Thurston Rd.; Repair West B St. storm outfall to Willamette River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St., Channel 6th, 72nd St and 48th St. canals; Repair damaged gutter bars causing localized flodding at 2138 9th St., 1105 S St., 2555 F St. 904 6th St., 345 22nd St., 15008 St and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations; Replace catch basin at 717 71st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St. intersection, 23rd St. - A to Main St., A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin from intersection of 17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Pipe the backyard drainage ditch between 46th - 47th St. and Bluebell - Aster St., Justification: The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenance and operating costs of the drainage system. Relation to Plans: Facilitates goals of the Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This is a minimal program for system repair and replacement and, while sufficient at this time it does not represent an amount of repair and replacement which will provide sustainable replacement of an aging system. Page IV - 4 City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Channel Improvement Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $360,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number lJ)> III ::t: lC III CD 0 w-::r 0'13 OCD -.;j ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 240,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 $ - TOTAL $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 Project Description: This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality and fish habitat functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and channel restoration. Justification: This project addresses the "Take Gl.lidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in their issuance of the Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook Salmon. This project also enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality through channel restoration improvements. Relation to Plans: This project helps implement and is associated with the federally-funded Mill Race Restoration project, the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the DEQ Stormwater discharge permit, and the Metro Waterways project. Maintenance Impacts: While this is a maintenance-type project, some of the drainage way improvements will likely increase maintenance responsibility as the drainage ways take on more of a function for stormwater quality management, not just stormwater conveyance. Page IV - 5 \J}> Q) ::l: 10 Q) Cll 0 w::r 0>3 Ocll ....,::J g::; Environmental Services Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category Implement MS4 Permit Requirements Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $150,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010.2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 TOTAL $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ - TOTAL $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ . 25,000 $ 125,000 Project Description: Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements. Justification: In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which will authorize the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The permit requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health and aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007 the City received the permit and this will become an ongoing program to maintain the permit. Relation to Plans: This project will assist with federal and state regulatory compliance as demonstrated through implementation of the City's Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, and facilitates City growth and development consistent with the Municipal and Development Codes. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance impacts will be considered and identified as projects are selected. Page IV - 6 Envir. Services Mgr/City Engineer Project Manager Riparian Land Management/Acquisitions Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Preservation Project Category $300,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U}> III ::t: (0 III CD (') w:r -..13 om _:1 ~:; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total on-going program Land and Right-of-Way $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Storm $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 185,000 Drainage Capital $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 65,000 $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Project Description: This project provides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them, and for purchase of riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. Justification: This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Code requirements and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, Springfield waterways routinely do not meet federal and state water quality safety standards for human and aquatic life. In addition to Federal Clean Water Act requirements to improve stormwater quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for at least 75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve this objective and some riparian protection has been established in the Development Code. In cases where riparian area protection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners, this funding will enable the City to identify priority areas for protection and to compensate property owners. Relation to Plans: This project supports implementation of the City Development Code, the Stormwater Management Plan, the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, along with compliance with the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act. Maintenance Impacts: Any City stormwater management facilities located within the acquired riparian areas will require increased maintenance. Anyon-going land management responsibilities will also require increased maintenance. Projects have not yet been selected. Cooperation with Willamalane and with environmental organizations, such as is being planned on the Oxbow property, may mitigate City responsibilities and costs. . Page IV - 7 Maintenance Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category $6,371,494 Total Cost Surface Drainage Maintenance Budget Subprogram Millrace Water Control Structure Project Title Capital Improvement projects Sheet P10667 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way(Vinyard) $ 633,700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 340,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 5,017,294 $ 380,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 380,500 Other '. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - TOTAL $ 5,990,994 $ 380,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 380,500 Funding Source(s) Federal Grant $ 4,080,270 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Capital Bond $ 526,724 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDC Storm $ 400,000 $ 280,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 280,500 Drainage Capital $ 350,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Existing City Assets $ 633,700 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 5,990,994 $ 380,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 380,500 Justification: Restoration of the aquatic ecosystem of the Springfield Mill race from Clearwater Park to 7th Street (the Booth- Kelly crane shed) bridge is the primary objective of this project. Additional project benefits include maintaining the groundwater level in the Springfield Utility Board's S. 28th Street well field; prevention of flooding along the Mill Race; and maintenance of adequate water supply for use by Springfield Forest Products. Due to potential adverse impact on anadromous fish, federal and state regulatory agencies have limited our use of equipment in the river to maintain Millrace flows; these agencies are requiring construction of permanent flow management facilities. The estimated value of the existing City property and in-kind services form a portion of City match for this project. Relation to Plans: Addresses a Council top priority target of Millrace development, inlet to outlet. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance costs are expected to increase by about $28,000 per year after the construction of the new facility. That cost increase is mostly related to maintaining the additional planted area, public walkways, and other amenities which will be provided with the project. There have been discussions with Willamalane which will continue, regarding their interest in taking on some of these obligations after project completion. -0)> W ::t: lOW CD (') w::r eo3 OCD --h~ Oleo )> Project Description: Design and construct a new inlet from the Middle Fork of the Willamette to the Mill Race and modify hydraulic characteristics of the Mill Race and Mill Pond in order to improve water quality and stabilize year round flows. Obtain federal and state agency's approval as required. Page IV - 8 :J ~.c .Ai _/;:::..------:':5~ Building Maintenance Supervisor Project Manager Preservation Project Category City Building Maintenance Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $311,780 Total Cost Building Maintenance Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U)> Q) ::t: to Q) CD (') w=r lD3 OCD _::J &l): ....KIUK Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 40,000 $ 173,782 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 17,998 $ - $ 271,780 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 40,000 $ 173,782 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 17,998 $ - $ 271,780 Funding Source(s) SDC (Old) $ 40,000 $ 173,782 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 17,998 $ - $ 271,780 TOTAL $ 40,000 $ 173,782 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 17,998 $ - $ 271,780 Project Description: Major maintenance contracted activities and unanticipated emergency facility equipment replacement. There is a fund balance maintained in the event of a major unforseen expenditure. Justification: . This item will maintain a fund to provide unanticipated major repairs or replacement of major pieces of equipment for the City facilities. Relation to Plans: Maintenance Impacts: . No impacts. Page IV - 9 "0)> w ~ (Q W (1) 0 ~::T 03 0(1) -+o~ g;)> Building Official Project Manager Preservation Project Category BK Drainage Master Plan & Phase I Implementation Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $ 150,000 Total Cost Booth-Kelly Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Funding Source(s) Booth Kelly Reserve $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Project Description: Drainage master plan implementation for the Booth-Kelly site. ~.".<=:'\ \ ~"-----...., .J... I MILL l~._,__.._.._.. , j , i Justification: Storm water runoff from the City-owned Booth-Kelly property is discharged to the Mill Race. The site currently does not have a drainage system adequate to avoid localized flooding during the wet weather season or provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge to the Mill Race. A site drainage master plan has been completed to address this issue in order to support ongoing operation of the Booth-Kelly industrial center and to comply with Clean Water Act storm water requirements and address ESA concerns. This project involves the implementation of the drainage master plan. n! " ~ ~ -_'~~Z'~,:.'.:..":" Relation to Plans: This drainage master plan will become a localized refinement of the City's Stormwater Facilities master plan. This plan also supports BK development consistent with the BK Conceptual Development Plan and correlates with the Mill Race restoration project. Maintenance Impacts: Dependent on final system constructed. Page IV - 10 "'0)> OJ ~ 10 OJ CD 0 .jl>.::T -"3 OCD _::l ~; Traffic Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Street Light In-fill & Pole Replace Project TItle Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $260,000 Total Cost Transportation Power and Light Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 7,500 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 40,000 Construction $ 67,500 $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 35,000 $ 30,000 $ 145,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 185,000 Funding Source(s) Street Capital $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 185,000 TOTAL $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 185,000 Project Description: Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by the public through the CIP process and throughout the year. Replace low pressure sodium (LPS) lights in concentrated areas. Test light poles at 7-10 year intervals and replace rotting poles and broken conduits of City- owned street light system. Justification: Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. Pole testing reveals condition of all City owned poles. The proposed project replaces poles identified as at the end of useful life. Relation to Plans: Lighting will be installed consistent with Street Lighting Program approved by the City Council in April 2004. Furthers the Council goal of continuing to make Springfield a safe and attractive community. Maintenance Impacts: . Historically, the new street lighting program has added 5-10 new street lights per year. Estimated maintenance and operation cost for each LPS light added is $75 per year, and about $70 per year for HPS, and $71 per year for MH, so each year of the program would add $350 to $700 in annual O&M cost Replacing LPS lights will reduce O&M in the long term. Page IV - 11 City Engineer Preservation Street Seal/Overlay Capital Project Manager Project Category Project Title Improvement Projects $2,548,400 Street Capital Projects N/A Sheet Total Cost Budget Subprogram Project Number "U)> w :4: IC W CD 0 .JlI.:::T N3 OCD -.:J g:): PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 30,000 $ 65,000 $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ 200,000 Construction $ 553,700 $ 207,700 $ 635,000 $ 450,000 $ 270,000 $ 232,000 $ 1,794,700 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 553,700 $ 237,700 $ 700,000 $ 500,000 $ 300,000 $ 257,000 $ 1,994,700 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans. Reimburs $ 97,700 $ 87,700 $ 100,000 $ 175,000 $ 195,000 $ 97,000 $ 654,700 Street Capital $ 456,000 $ 150,000 $ 600,000 $ 325,000 $ 105,000 $ 160,000 $ 1,340,000 TOTAL $ 553,700 $ 237,700 $ 700,000 $ 500,000 $ 300,000 $ 257,000 $ 1,994,700 Project Description: A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement slurry seal and/or overlay performed by contract. Following is a partial list with of the highest priority Overlays/Reconstructions: E. 17th Ave. (945 ft, $190,000), Laura St. (1,600 ft., $235,000), "I" St. (525 ft., $105,000), Daisy St. (7,495 ft., $750,000), "E" St. (5,435 ft., $543,500), S. 49th PI. (1,810 ft., $181,000), Gateway St. (6,280 ft., $750,000), Harlow Rd. (3,500 ft., $420,000), N. 42nd St. (2,900 ft., $350,000), 28th St., (5,000 ft., $ 500,000). Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs is a relatively low-cost method of prolonging the street life. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. . Relation to Plans: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Maintenance Impacts: Public Works has estimated that an annual budget of $1 ,000,000 per year for street capital maintenance is necessary to adequately keep the existing street system in its present condition. Therefore the present funding available is insufficient and will, in the long run, result in a deterioration 'of the streets and greater future maintenance cost. Page IV - 12 City Engineer Project Manager 5th Street Overlay "B" Street to Centennial Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Preservation Project Category $600,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram P20512 Project Number Jr)> lC::I: CD 0 ~:T (,.)3 o~ -0, r+ 01)> 00 PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 480,000 $ 480,000 Other $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 TOTAL $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Street Capital $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 Project Description: Overlay 5th Street from "B" Street to Centennial Boulevard. Some locations may require more extensive base repair due to the dilapidated condition. Justification: The pavement surface has aged and is in need of an overlay and some localized base rock repair. This is the last major segment of 5th Street that is in need of preservation work as the segment from Centennial Boulevard to Hayden Bridge Way was overlayed during the summer of 2005. Relation to Plans: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Maintenance Impacts: This project is one of the major items identified by Public Works under the Street Seal/Overlay Category. This project is seen as a priority to keep the status of the City's collector and arterial roadways in a managable state. By overlaying the remainder of 5th Street now, we can lengthen the life of the street and avoid a costly reconstruction project. Page I V - 13 City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Wood stave Removal 10th to 14th Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $250,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram P50174 Project Number "'0)> III ::+ 10 III CD C1 .j>o.::::T .j>o.3 OCD _:J g;; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIA liONS 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ 30,000 Design and Engineering $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 120,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Project Description: Project to take the last active portion of the wood stave storm line out of service. Portions of this line lie under buildings and across properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposal requirements. Justification: This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problems and costs. Relation to Plans: This project will conform to recommendations of the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This section of line is a significant pending maintenance concern. Because of the line coating, any maintenance on the line must be done with special procedures and precautions. Removal and replacement of the line will avoid larger future maintenance costs. Page IV - 14 ESD Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category Firehouse Vehicle Wash Facilities Capital Project Title Improvement Projects N/A Sheet Project Number $185,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram "'0)> III _ lO- co III o -"":::T 013 Oco _::I ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design am~ Engineering $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 Construction $ 65,000 $ 105,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 105,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 65,000 $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 120,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 65,000 $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 120,000 Wastewater Capital $ - $ - TOTAL $ 65,000 $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 120,000 Project Description: This project creates basic vehicle wash facilities at each fire house to ensure that vehicle washwater does not enter the storm system. Presently, each station washes vehicles daily, discharging detergents .and cleansers to the storm drain. Its not feasible to centralize the washing process, as the vehicles must remain avaiiable. Proposed facilities will be minimal and provide basic protection to the drainage system. Station #2 was completed in 2005. Justification: Washing of emergency and fire vehicles, as presently done, discharges washwater into the storm drain system, including detergents, etc., and is a violation of both state and federal water, quality regulations and local ordinances. As proposed, the new wash facilities will re-route washwater to the sanitary sewer system, and stormwater to the storm system. Where appropriate, low-impact washwater infiltration areas will be installed instead of piped systems. Relation to Plans: This project will assist with regulatory compliance with provisions of the Clean Water Act's NPDES program, and Springfield's adopted Stormwater Management . Plan. It will also bring the City into compliance with our own municipal code, which prohibits discharges of deleterious materials, such as wash water, to the storm system. Maintenance Impacts: Minimal. The proposed simple wash systems will include valving installed on a standard catch basin to redirect flows as appropriate. The basin will capture sediments, etc. as they presently do, while routing contaminated wash water to sanitary. No additional maintenance, other than normal cleanout, should be needed. Page IV - 15 '"0)> III ::l= 10 III CD () .j>.':J 0>3 OCD .....:J - g;)> Building Official Project Manager Preservation Project Category Booth-Kelly Building Removal Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $100,000 Total Cost Booth-Kelly Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 35,000 $ 15,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 TOTAL $ 35,000 $ 15,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 Funding Source(s) Booth Kelly Reserve $ 35,000 $ 15,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 TOTAL $ 35,000 $ 15,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 Project Description: Removal of building, wood pilings and Millrace bank restoration. Justification: In conjunction with the Army Corp of Engineers Millrace project, the City is responsible for the removal of the building constructed over the Millrace west of the spillway dam. If the Millrace project is delayed, the removal of the building and all ancillary work will not occur. Relation to Plan: This project supports Booth-Kelly development consistent with the Booth-Kelly Development Plan. Maintenance Impacts: Removes maintenance demands of the existing building. Page IV - 16 Building Maintenance Supervisor Project Manager Preservation Project Category Minor City Facilities Projects Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $160,000 Total Cost Building Maintenance Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') .J>,:::r "'-'3 OCD _:::I ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-ot-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 Funding Source(s) SDC (Old) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 TOTAL $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 Project Description: Perform various planned preservation projects on City-owned buildings, including painting, root replacement, HVAC maintenance and replacement, lighting and alarm system replacement and upgrade, etc. Justification: Projects are necessary to maintain and preserve the City's physical assets. Relation to Plans: Carries out Council Priority - Building Preservation Maintenance Impacts: Project management and support will require 0.10 - 0.15 FTE per year PagelV-17 "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') ....:::r 013 OCD _:::I ~; City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category 21 st Street Reconstruction D Street to Main Street Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $300,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ 80,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 Funding Source(s) Street Capital $ _. $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 SDC Trans, Improvement $ 200,000 $ 200,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 Project Description: Major rehabilitation/reconstruction of 21 st Street from D Street to Main Street. The project will include new sidewalks, bike lanes and pavement. The total project cost is estimated to be $900,000. Justification: During the summer 2006 the J Street to D Street section of 21 st Street was reconstructed. In 2005, Olympic Street to Centennial Boulevard was overlayed. The D Street to Main Street section represents the final segment of 21 st Street to be repaired. This section is is serious structural decline and current maintenance levels cannot keep up with the current rate of decline. The intersection at Main Street will also be addressed with this project. Relation to Plans: Adopted in the Central Lane TMA Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan. Maintenance Impacts: Due to the street's current condition, this project will reduce the on-going maintenance effort and cost. Page IV - 18 Maintenance Manager Project Manager. Preservation Project Category Maint. Shop Vehicle Wash Rack Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $400,000 Street/San ita rylD rai nage Budget Subprogram P50272 Project Number ~)> (Q;:+ CD (') .J>.:::r co3 O~ - - (1)> 0) PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ 15,000 Construction $ 150,000 $ 235,000 $ - $ - $ 235,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 150,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Storm $ - $ - $ - Drainage Capital $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Wastewater Capital $ 150,000 $ - TOTAL $ 150,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 Project Description: Replacement of existing vehicle/equipment wash facilities at City Maint. shops to comply with Federal, State, and local sanitary and stormwater regulations. The present facility does not meet State and Federal requirements and operates outside of MWMC's current policies and procedures. Proposed tasks include construction of a steel building to cover the facility, a storage building to house pressure pumps and cleaning equipment, elevated catwalk to allow efficient equipment washing and load tarping, and asphalt paving to meet current City code. Justification: Completion of the facility will help maintain compliance with State and Federal Clean Water Act requirements, and supports City Council's stormwater goals, as well as enhancing the functionality arid efficiency of the Maintenance facility. This entire project is part of the ongoing modernization of the City's Maintenance shops to meet provisions of the City's adopted Stormwater Management Plan.. Relation to Plans: Provides a facility that will meet Federal, State, and Local disharge standards for onsite storm and sanitary sewers. Maintenance Impacts: The Public Works Maintenance Division is charged with the responsibility of maintaining and preserving the public infrastructure. This project is designed to meet the 25 year facility needs. . PagelV-19 ~ ~ TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT (Q - CD ~ ~ ~ IMPROVEMENTS _:::I CJ1- 0>)> Traffic Engineer Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Traffic Control Projects Project Title $525,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Project Number "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') 01:::r .....3 Q~ ~:; Project Description: This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of roundabouts at various intersections in town. Potential candidate intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd & Marcola Road, 28th & Main, 21st & Main, 40th & Daisy St. and 28th & Centennial. The modification of signals may include change to permissive left turn at some existing signalized intersections. School speed zones beacons and miscellaneous striping and signing improvements may also be implemented under the. Traffic Control Projects. PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Ongoing Program Land and Right-of-Way $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Design and Engineering $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 41 ,000 Construction $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 334,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 425,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 425,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 425,000 Justification: As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop sign control. The intersections will meet roundabout or signal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed. The modification of existing signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and to enhance traffic flow. Relation to Plans: This project is consistent with the Metro Area Transportation Plan for improving traffic flow, traffic safety, and reducing vehicular accidents. Maintenance Impacts: Traffic signals will increase costs for power, lamp replacement, and timing modifications. Roundabouts will increase costs for irrigation and landscape maintenance. Annual cost for roundabouts is about half the cost of traffic signals, with annual per signal cost being about $6,500 and annual roundabout maintenance cost being about $3,300. Page V- 1 "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') 01:::r "->3 OCD -~ ~)> Transportation Manager Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Gateway Area Traffic Improvements Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,407,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2009-2010 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Ongoing Program Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Design and Engineering $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 200,000 Construction $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 192,000 $ 215,000 $ 1,007,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 242,000 $ 215,000 $ 1,207,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 200,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 242,000 $ 215,000 1,207,000 TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250 000 242 000 $ 215 000 1 207 000 Project Description: Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity and relieve congestion. Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and reduce fuel use and to allow for continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years ago resulted in a list of priority projects. Relation to Plans: Furthers Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the top priority target of Gateway Development. Conforms to Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis recommendations. r Maintenance Impacts: Any improvements which expand the infrastructure in the area will result in added maintenance costs. Page V - 2 Transportation Manager Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Intelligent Transport Systems Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $300,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') 01:::r (,.)3 OCD _:::I ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 Construction $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 225,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Project Description: Installation of various traffic control, information and data collection systems such as signal interconnect equipment, detection and count loops, incident management and traffic conditions signing, traffic responsive signal systems and software, and traveler information systems. Justification: To provide centralized data collection, control of traffic signals and signs in outlaying areas which enhance the ability to communicate driver information, control traffic flow, and coordinate signals with each other. Relation to Plans: Oregon Department of Transportation Eugene-Springfield ITS Plan. Maintenance Impacts: Dependent on the type of systems installed. Page V - 3 Transportation Manager Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Beltline/Gateway Intersection Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $7,845,505 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') 01:::r .J>.3 OCD -;1 ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ 3,245,505 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 4,000,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 7,245,505 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 Funding Source(s) Developer $ 6,597,195 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 STP ODOT-STP $ 573,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - LTD $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ODOT ROW $ 50,150 TOTAL $ 7,245,505 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 600,000 Project Description: Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, including construction of a couplet and purchase of right-of-way. Justification: Needed for improving level of service at the intersection and maintaining proper function of the intersection in relationship to the 1-5/Beltline Interchange. Relation to Plans: This improvement is required as part of the 1-5/Beltline Interchange improvements as described in the Environmental Assessment of the 1-5/Beltline project. Maintenance Impacts: There will be additional lanes, landscaping and intersections to maintain. Page V- 4 City Engineer Project Manager South 48th Street Connection Main Street to Daisy Street Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category $710,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "0)> Dl ;:+ (Q Dl CD (') 01:::r 013 OCD _:::I ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ 535,000 $ - $ 535,000 TOTAL $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 535,000 $ - $ 535,000 Funding Source(s) SDCTrans, Reimbursment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDC Trans, Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ 360,000 Developer $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ - $ 175,000 TOTAL $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 535,000 $ - $ 535,000 Project Description: Construct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South 48th Street Intersection. Justification: Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street to support planned land development Project #901 IN RTP and TransPlan. Relation to Plans: The project is listed in the Systems Development charge projects and is adopted in the Central Lane TMA Regional Transportation Plan. Maintenance Impacts: . This project will add roadway, sidewalks and facilities to maintenance effort. Page V- 5 ~)> (Q::I: CD (') 01:::r 0>3 O~ - - (1)> 0) Traffic Engineer Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Pioneer Parkway Ughing "Q" Street to Hayden Bridge Way Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $250,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIA liONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - Construction $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ - SDC Trans, Improvement $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 125,000 Street Capital $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 Project Description: Install new street illumination poles, fixtures, services, and raceways to illuminate Pioneer Parkway East and Pioneer Parkway West to current standards. Illumination of Pioneer Path is not included in the scope of this project and is expected to be completed by L TD's EmX project due to the proximity of the path to the transit ways. Justification: Traffic volumes and truck usage of Pioneer Parkway is increasing with the opening of Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkway. The road will continue to experience increases in use as the RiverBend area develops. Street illumination improves traffic safety and user comfort by increasing driver perception of the road users and environment around them. Relation to Plans: No street lighting planning document exists. Projects are identified by staff and citizens as needs arise. Maintenance Impacts: Increases in payments made to Springfield Utility Board for energy, operations and maintenance are expected to amount to approximately $4,600 per year. Page v- 6 INDEX Attachment A Page 57 of 58 INDEX Street/Traffic Signal Projects 21st Street Reconstruction D to Main Street................. .IV-18 5th Street Overlay "B" Street to Centennial Blvd............ .IV-13 Beltline/Gateway Intersection..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-4 Bob Straub IGA With Lane County.......... ..................... .1-9 Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure... .......................... .1-1 Franklin Boulevard Planning................................... .1-4 Gateway Area Traffic Improvements............................. .V-2 Intelligent Transport Systems................................. .V-3 S. 48th Street Connection Main to Daisy....... ,............... .V-5 Street Light In-fill and Pole Replacement............ ....... .IV-11 Street Seal/Overlay.......................................... IV-12 Traffic Control Projects............................ ......... ..V-1 Transportation Demand project.................. ............. .111-1 Major Sidewalk Construction and Preservation.. .............. .111-2 Sanitary Sewer Project Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor.............................. .1-2 Jasper Road Sewer Extension.................... ............... .1-7 Sanitary Sewer Repair............................. ........... .IV-1 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement........................ .IV-2 Maintenance Shop Vehicle Wash Rack.................. ........ .IV-19 Storm Sewer Projects 54th and J Drainage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111-3 Channel Improvement........................................... IV-5 Drainage Repair. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IV-4 Firehouse Vehicle Wash Facilities........................... .IV-15 Implement MS4 Permit Requirements............................ .IV-6 Metro Waterways Study......................................... IV-3 Millrace Water Control Structure............................. .IV-8 Riparian Land Management Acquisitions........................ .IV-7 S & T Street Drainage between 10th.& Debra.................. .111-4 Woodstave Removal lOth to 14th............................. .IV-14 Miscellaneous Projects Booth-Kelly Building Removal................................ .IV-16 Booth-Kelly Drainage......... ............................... .IV-10 City Building Maintenance.................................... .IV-9 City Participation, Private Projects.......................... .1-3 Federal Office Building....................................... .1-8 Future Growth Projects........................................ .1-5 Gray-Jaqua Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-6 Justice Center Facility................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-1 Minor City Facilities.. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IV-17 Attachment A Page 58 of 58