The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Miscellaneous 1988-5-16 I.' ';~4dJ I I ! L-___ CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Planning and Development Department DATE OF LETTER May 16, 1988 DATE OF MEETING May 12, 1988 i4 s-I (;J UL I nLA-r APPLICANT Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission 225 North 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 Attn: R. Kip Burdick, Supv. Civil Engineer SUBJECT CITY JOURNAL NUMBER 88-05-73. Type I Site Plan Review: The Springfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Demolition Project will convert the existing mothballed facility into an open, passive space and will be landscaped and contoured in order to accommodate conversion to a sewage retention basin in 15 to 20 years. All structures, foundations and piping not in use will be removed. ' Drainage, irrigation and landscaping will be provided. The location is 1451 Walnut Street. The zoning is Public Land and Open-Space; the Metro Plan Designation is PLO. The site is outside of the Willamette Greenway because of its public facility use. The site abuts the planning area of the Alton Baker Park Master Plan (ABPMP), a functional plan also adopted by the Council. The open-space proposal is generally consistent with the Plan. Sensitive vegetation in the area needs to be preserved. There are no specifically identified natural or historic features on the site. Tax Assessor Map# 17033423 Tax Lot 800. The proposed use is permitted under Site Plan Review (SDC 23.020(4)(h)). There are no Special Use Standards to be met. ATTENDANCE APPLICANT: Kip Burdick, MWMC; Ron Cameron, Cameron and McCarthy; and John Holroyd, Brown and Caldwell. CITY STAFF: Gary Karp, Carol Denner, Al Peroutka, Les Craigmile and Gary McKenney. DISCUSSION The meeting Attachment A). report dated December 18, 1987, The following was agreed to: was discussed at this meeting (See 1. The only parking required at this time will be the area shown on the plan to be used primarily for a trailer to bring a generator in to run the pump. At other times parallel parking for the public will be allowed. Page 2 MYMC Type I Site Plan I 2. Street and street light improvements will be required (as specified in SDC 32.020 (lO(b) see attached) but deferrep to a future date by means of a special improvement agreement either preparep separately or as part of the required Development Agreement. Since there, is some uncertainty relating to monies to cover the required improvements, the special improvement agreement will provide for these monies. The exact amount of these monies will be determined by the City's Engineering Division. 3. - Irrigation and drainage plans will be submitted as part of the Final Site Plan submittal. ACTION PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL subject to requirements under Criteria of Approval (See Attachment A). VHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO OBTAIN FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL? 1. A Final Site Plan drawn to scale to include the location of the required street lights is required within 90 days of the date of this letter. 2. Signing an Improvement Agreement for Aspen and North Yalnut Streets. This agreement will be a special document which may be included as part of the required Development Agreement if time becomes an issue. 3. A signed Development Agreement. This agreement will be prepared by staff upon approval of your Final Site Plan. APPEAL If you wish to appeal this Type I Site Plan Review decision, you must do so within 10 days of the date of this letter. Your appeal must be in accordance with the Springfield Development Code, Article 15, APPEALS. QUESTIONS Please call the Planning and Development Department at 726-3759 if you have any questions regarding this process. PREPARED BY_ ~ ~A:: Associate Planner Copy To: DRC Members cc: Ron Cameron, Cameron and McCarthy John Holroyd, Brown and Caldwell ~ . .. ATTACHMENT A FINDINGS CRITERIA OF APPROVAL [Xl DEMONSTRATED COMPLIANCE YITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF THIS CODE. When the applicable Springfield Development Code Standards below have been met, this application will have demonstrated compliance with the applicable standards of this Code. [Xl PARKING AREAS AND INGRESS-EGRESS POINTS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED SO AS TO FACILITATE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, TO AVOID CONGESTION AND TO MINIMIZE CURB CUTS ON ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS. There is no parking standard Springfield Development Code. shown on the plan. for this use; no parking is required by the However, on-street parking will be provided as .. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS -. Street and street light improvements along Aspen and North Walnut Streets will be required but deferred to a future date by means of a special improvement agreement either prepared separately or as part of the required Development Agreement because of the uncertainty of design of these streets at this time. \ ) (9) ~here necessary to pro~ide access to encourage urban development of adjacent land, streeis shall be extended to the boundary lines of that portion of the property proposed to be developed or subdivided. A City standard barricade shall be constructed at the developer's expense at the end of, and/or parallel to the street. (10) Additional Right of 'Way and Street Improvements. (a) ~henever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a development area requiring Development Approval, additional right of way shall be required. ~henever street dedication results in right of way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Recording Officer. This deed restriction shall state that the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street serving the property, and connecting with the City street system, is constructed. . - ~~~never a proposed land division or development w~. increase traffic on the City street system and that development has un~mproved street frontage abutting a fully improved street, tha~ street frontage shall be fully improved to City standards. Provided, however, an Improvement Agreement shall be required in all other cases as a CO~dition of Development Approval where unimproved street frontage eXl l.:>. ., (c) In subdivisions, a performance bond or suitable substitute in a sufficien~ amount to ensure the completion of all required improvements prior to occupancy or Final Plat approval may be required by the Director or the City Engineer and the City Attorney. (d) Partial width (two-thirds) streets shall be permitted only if all of the following criteria are met: 1. There is inadequate right of way to install a fully improved street without changing street alignments. 2. The two-thirds street is adequate to carry anticipated traffic loads until adjacent properties are developed and the street is fully improved. (e) If the developer bears the full cost of dedicating and/or constructing 2/3 of an otherwise fully improved street, the developer may retain a reserve strip subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The retention of this strip does not constitute either an express or implied agreement by the City to require an abutting property owner to take access to the street across the reserve strip. 32-6 .. . C,... .. .. ',I' ~..-1: ~. "C, ...../ .. C:;.. ....".,; "":;i' (!If;\ \..::..-:>.1:/