HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Field Test & Inspection Report 2002-9-10
'r
Community Services Div, Building Safety
CITY OF SPRlNGFIPT n, OREGON
225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
Job Address
City Job #
1,?O&f
~111\
, ':11 l:;~'" " .~~, ,."~r,'~;,~l,,~'i',;:.t-~:~ :'"",~~,~}"_";:' ,,::'~~,"~~i"~l"~,~'\:.!'..,,'.:.,,:._~,~,:J.:" ""::"~'"
-
AMBLES IDE l\1EADOWS SUBDIVISION--tST ADDITION
Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals
foundation requirements - new structures on residential lots
This form may be used as a temporary verification to allow construction to continue
on the job site until the consultant's stamped affidavit on the site soll compaction
and stabilization is submitted to the City. This form must be completed by a
licensed design professional (engineer or architect) or hislher authorized employee,
and submitted to the building inspector prior to requesting City inspections or
placing foundation concrete. It is important that all questions be answered
completely for the foundation site to be approved for construction.
Owner and/or Contractor H. k~ Jo..D~ D~UldW\)& 1"1-et"\1
1. Date of the design professional's site evaluation? ~ \ lOb "2-
2. Has the design professional reviewed a copy of the geotechnical information
fo~ the subdivision that was provided with the building permit? Yes$:No_
If not, please contact this office for a copy of the report. The design professional
must be familiar with the geotechnical info-rmation before completing this form.
3. What was the size and depth of the excavation and lor fill? .
i/ -- -::;......, ~~ c...4JA..TL-8() ~ 'LODO .d1 {p - ~ '
t>~.
Was existing non-structural fill or expansive soil encountered on the lot?
_~es_No,l{ If "yes", what types, depths and locations?
~-
~-<
,[\
What measures were taken to remedy the soil condition (include type of
engineered fIll used to stabilize the soil)? ~!,J..
1
"
Community Services Div, Building Safety
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 5th Street. Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
Job Address
City Job #
'1; ~ t!> '"
~1'-t
Is the site as prepared adequate. inadequate 0 to maintain constant moisture
content in the sub grade? Note: Verification of moisture stabilization in the sub
grade is a requirement of the geotechnical report, and must be affirmed before
construction can continue.
If inadequate, what measures are needed to provide constant moisture content in
the sub grade?
Is the site as prepared adequate"flS inadequate 0 to support the proposed
structure? An affinnative answer is requisite to proceeding with construction.
If inadequate, what additional work is needed to provide adequate
foundation support?
4. Did the design professional witness placement and compaction of the N / ~ IJ
engineered flll, or is there a special inspection report forthcoming from a
qualified agency? I witnessed Placement 0 Special Insp/compaction report 0
s. The design professional intends to use the following method for installation
of perforated perimeter footing drains:
The design on the attached drawing provided by the design professional ...... ~
The method shown on the original construction drawings............... ..... ..... 0
The typical 'Foundation Drain' drawing attached to permit ..................... 0
Perforated perimeter drains are not required ....................................... 0
Comments:
Note: City inspectors will inspect installed drains prior to cover upon request.~.
Call: 726-3769 to schedule inspection.
2
Community Services Div, Building Safety
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 Slh Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
Job Address
City Job #
1.- ~ 0i'I
~1~
Low-point crawl space drains are required to prevent the build-up of excess
moisture inside the foundations during (and after) construction. This drain
may be installed after foundation placement onlv with the exnress nermission
of the desim nrofessionaI.
a The design professional has determined the following:
The crawl space drain is required when the fowuiation is installed..... c2t
The low-point drain can be installed after foundation placement without a
significant moisture build-up problem within thefoundation............. ~
(The low-point drain may be installed at the A f.-:l. '1' . stage
of construction) post & beam,Jran:mg. roofing. ete.
b. Has the design professional observed and approved the installation of the
required low point drain?................................... Yes, No /<
if "yes", where is the low point drain located under the building and
where does it terminate at this time? (must be an approved location, i.e.
street gutter, storm sewer, sump pump and discharge line to the street,
etc.)
The design professional must determine whether the approved permit drawings have
adequate foundation steel. Is any additional foundation steel required that is not
shown on the foundation drawings for the building?
Yes lr-~ No If "yes", describe additional steel required (or provide drawing).
~
ttL"H:\J-'~ e ~(P.
The following statement must be signed by the individual doing the observations and
providing directionfor the excavation and site preparation work on the property.
,\\ .:;.
3
"
Community Services Div, Buildmg Safety Job Address ~ (::)~
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON City Job #
225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
~1\4
The undersigned design professional (or authorized employee) attests that he/she
observed required moisture stability procedures on this site, and that such procedures
were accomplished before any changes occurred in the moisture content of the sub-
grade under and around the building (where expansive soils were encountered). The
undersigned fUrther attests that the sub-grade, as prepared, is adequate to support the
building proposed for this site.
Additional comments:
(Note): A copy of this report shall be kept on site with the approved plans at all
times.
This report shall be followed by an affidavit, signed and stamped by the design
professional under whose auspices this report was completed, affirming the infonnation
herein. The signed/stamped affidavit together with a copy of this report shall be
submitted to this office prior to requesting framing inspection for the building.
Signature e.\G~ ~~':..~ - I ~-L v1. -'
Name title rs.",(". .o.~!:ttl(,..
Company t-lb .e..\"~, e \l'\Co:. "'" l.",'h-l' \.1 l.
Phone ~tJ4.- ~&e~
Licensee
License #
P la-N\ (.i;t...~ <; .
.c:, '-\ b t.l.. .r ~
l-l. " l L ~ t ro 1"'\
expires
{pf 1:>0' 0":)
.--
The geotechnical report for the Ambleside Meadows _ 1 st Addition Subdivision
recommends immediate moisture stabilization of exposed expansive sub-grades) and that
expansive soils be over-excavated and replaced with at least 12 inches of fill compacted
to at least 95% of ASTM D698 for foundation preparation. The report also recommends
that measures be taken to prevent water from collecting in or around the foundation areas
during and after the construction process, and that positive site drainage be provided to
reduce the infiltration of surface water into the expansive soils. '
The geotechnical report further emphasizes that the finish grade of landscape soil
adjacent to the foundation should be at least 24JJ above the expansive bearing soils, fmnlv
comoacted to reduce the infiltration of water at the surface. The adequacy of fill soil
material around the building must be verified to the satisfaction of the design
professional.
4
\ I
-et ~ 1""" ·
Community Services Div, Building Safety Job Addres~ 1.- ~~ I
CITY OF SPRlNGFIELD) OREGON City Job #
225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
,#
j~, "'~'/~: ; '\'" ~- f~. '~'"':~ :~"'H' '~<, ; ',;,~>'1:- ~'(-\ ~'t,: l-,i~_' i J ,1:' J _, /. :!, "''', ~ .J... t /.\ '; '~~1 ~. 1\~lI.'_,,~\,~:!'~;>' : :,'~' ,::l.- .\~~
-
Affidavit
For Site Investigation Questionnaire
Foundation Sub-Grade Approval for
Residential Building Site in Ambleside Meadows - 1 st Addition
Subdivision
The undersigned hereby affirms that the excavation, structural fill and moisture
stabilization methods for the building site at the address shown above was observed by
me or an authorized employee of my firm and that the following is true:
1. The foundation sub-grade is capable of supporting a minimum of 1500 psf, and is
adequate to support the building proposed for this site.
2. The moisture content of the excavation was adequately maintained during the site
preparation process and was adequately covered to stabilized moisture content
prior to any significant change in moisture content of the sub-grade.
3. The site is adequately graded and drained to prevent the collection of water in the
excavated area during construction.
4. The accompanying report titled "Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting
Design Professionals" containing field observations and instructions made on
q /1 /) / /:) ~ ( date) for the building site was completed either by
myself or by an employee of my firm under my supervision. To the best of my
knowledge) the information contained in that report is complete and accurate.
Name of Licens~d Professional (print) R .\I\I\,.Q \ G..,
signa~wJA \~
Date '111'1 M 2--
I .
... EXPIRATION O.~lf Sl291 0 J. j.
,
I
I
CALCULATIONS
STRUCTURAL
BUILDING DESIGN. FIRE PROTECTION
CODE CONSULTANT. PLAN CHECKING
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
wo#
't)c:Y....l'== t--=::> t2-t3l \r-r /-t....V'S .
v,?oq '6/ ~
fM.I?G~ lo-e .... _ Vp.;;.ot v \ 'S l D n.
P E::S \ (...,.l>~
e. E?I /-1 )...'>, /I (.,.. ~ />.- LL S
H~
I
"b
B~68
A.~..:;;>ovr;
-
c:;. [....~ r? (?"b? 'I f2-~ I ~ t?;. D -
t;.P'N ~-f-.- ~J?1_L:'~____ "36
-f~f
- -------
\
\
h,
t
I.
It?
;f/'/~
l'
I ' I~i
vvl
\;-'1
Lt?PL- '10~'
rz- --( t.-1
y\ L p L-> '"
I
H t?e?l-
Fbt:>-rt-\ ?~6~'
;Jla.
~f?
\
f?1>~
A~ :;;:
J:: C;.l? 'P
z.. ?t"i. O..f- .!1-..
~ -&1 )L~/;~C~ OC1()) ~
l~~1 ~V'())
1245 PEARL ST · EUGENE, OREGON 97401
CLIENT H /A.. ~./:::.. 0 l:::.-
I
{21'7-
SHEET NO
OF
9'
CALCULATED BY
DATE
CHECKED BY
DATE
\ 't i77 Lo
.1 EXPIRA1l0N DATE 6/30/03
\;-Ij;a(,.t,2
rz..~40l>\"r
,~7! ~
~ C? Q \ e,,1" 0 \ " \~.J
fP ~O ~ I I 1;1""""
TEL: (541) 484-9080
STRUCTURAL
BUILDING DESIGN. FIRE PROTECTION
CODE CONSULTANT. PLAN CHECKING'"
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
CLIENT M~?AO ,A
2- ::P
SHEET NO OF
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
WO# 1'-+ tJ 1~
(
,.
CALCULATIONS
\, J U L-
v- OJ-'&>
'1t'e
~
CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL BASE DESIGN
DENSITY OF STEM 150 PCF
STEM HEIGHT 8 000 FT
STEM THICKNESS - 8 INCHES OTM => 4021 LB-FT
!
BASE HEIGHT . 10 INCHES
BASE WIDTH 60 INCHES RM=> 10182 LB-FT
ASSUMED TOE LENGTH 32 INCHES
DEAD LOAD ON WALL 36 PLF W=> 2928 LBS
SURCHARGE ON SOIL o PSF
SOIL WEIGHT 110"PCF 1/6 => 10.00 INCHES
HORIZONTAL PRESSURE 35 PSF
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE 1500 PSF I' => 60 00 INCHES
SLIDING FRICTION COEFF 07
e => 4 75 INCHES **IN MIDDLE THIRD**
SOIL PRESSURE AT TOE => 863 PSF OK
OVERTURNING S F => 253 OK
SLIDING S F => 1 50 OK
MOMENT AT BASE OF STEM => 2987 LB-FT
1 SHEAR AT BASE OF STEM => 1120 LBS
"
,-
1245 PEARL ST. · EUGENE, OREGON 97401
TEL: (541) 484-9080
CALCULATIONS
STRUCTURAL
BUILDING DESIGN. FIRE PROTECTION
CODE CONSULTANT. PLAN CHECKING
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
\,.v ./ L- 0 I-' t-
\.,-t e:~?" '"
CLIENT i- I~ A ~;JJ.. Ofi.-
c -
SHEET NO 3 OF ?
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
WO# 1'f~1~
:i
CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL BASE DESIGN
DENSITY OF STEM
STEM HEIGHT
STEM THICKNESS
BASE HEIGHT
BASE WIDTH
ASSUMED TOE LENGTH
DEAD LOAD ON WALL
SURCHARGE ON SOIL
SOIL WEIGHT
HORIZONTAL PRESSURE
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE
SLIDING FRICTION COEFF
150 PCF
8 000 FT
8 INCHES
10 INCHES
56 INCHES
8 INCHES
36 PLF
o PSF
110 PCF
35 PSF
1800 PSF
0.7
e =>
8.77 INCHES **IN MIDDLE THIRD**
SOIL PRESSURE AT TOE =>
OVERTURNING S F =>
SLIDING S F =>
MOMENT AT BASE OF STEM =>
SHEAR AT BASE OF STEM =>
! ,., 'ti ~!
1809 PSF
274
223
2987 LB-FT
1120 LBS
NG
OK
OK
1245 PEARL ST. · EUGENE, OREGON 97401
TEL: (541) 484-9080
CALCULATIONS
STRUCTURAL
BUILDING DESIGN. FIRE PROTECTION
CODE CONSULTANT. PLAN CHECKING
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
t I
L- (? ~~ 'It:' &-
De;ri~Il-
fZj:E ~AO-Z
~P-A08 U70
~O(\ " -Z 1., l? OlD P ";. J \) ~I b f'\
U?rz ~ooD r""= 1 p€fL
G-t? 0 e (21-
~lA-f.b
l /J "?"fC. CL ~:' 'i ~ cL-
p{2--t- oeL TO ~~\7Ll.A-
I
-I
~'2.~1
l
~
,
0l.;--~~
i
It/II 7:
~ tl 91" Of? ~:t ~J
0.. I ,
: "
#-- s @. 1'2--1( of L- ~' &t;J
71
I
I
8 I rL~:r
~ ~ O.,A
CLIENT
SHEET NO d- OF r::;7
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
WON I Lf'31~
,I
f, tJ J
I I
I
----
.
L.Lg-t...~ P~L.1-
\-JO c:-'-~\
//
"
'2.
.c.-L.- f2..
,'to
//"'..
"--,
_J
...-....--
It
-~ 5 e tZ" 011- ~1tJ };fJ
.'-
fJ,. S pOIJ-l ~ S (2
1'2- II 01,- ( --1
\ \
~1.
1-
1/
I
.::::-------,12' II lL-P~ i-JD /2.. 0 '-"\~
/
,
.:;;;;,,,:, :::.-- -
,5 ::;.f' 'J; ~ t9
,. p; (--- ,
~ ,1,~
~
II
~ 4> F~~f TO
~,b.~ll..' OUI p-L.OIW
,
\1 '\
~ ;' ~~
"\
- ------ '---. '"
I \
,-
,I . ,,,a,..
's j\ .:: r;;ij;"f't c,t? ~ 1"
It--J f.. t...- L,... .
1245 PEARL 8T. · EUGENE, OREGON 97401
TEL: (541) 484-9080
,"
CLIENT !1}..: ~p..O A-
SHEET NO 0 OF 0
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
WO# ....' . ILf 1;10
."
CALCULATIONS
STRUCTURAL
"BUILDING DESIGN. FIRE PROTECTION
CODE CONS~LTANT. PLAN CHECKING
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
J! 'L &;' 1..J L&- H E:' e ~ \I ~ /-.... \... I.- '
...
{.2.. ~f'=.p.\rL- -Z &. ~O e fa 0
L-&1lL-fZ.--b-'T8"" 2' 1.--c;e;>U p?) OI;3SH,tJ
l)~ 6000' f~\ ft:1P- coO€'
fJII
il. ,
'; l
I
*-'? e. I '2-- ~ ~/t- FlU (L' \
t "'- --1- (\ rz.\\ '-- t- ~
1"''''''----
Wo bowta6 e(L--7'
It-II p / t.-
[l
"3 f' ~ '~', ,?)Il II
/ ~ 4o~
-.-/ <5 L,4...17] I'. J- I "
"_-11
..-- II \
\~
\ ~ -t- (/7 ./'
\ I}I t-- f' ~__~I~J, P'
1__,
.l. ... 1
,
I
l ~T~LL ? lfl:P.,
P a... L () tZ.- t1J :p;,u- Ie: P 1lJ.,.
?(o II
~
,.
B' ~t;\ \tJf....Vl-
12-"'r-
~) ~
- , .
~ V/" '"
1245 PEARL ST. · EUGENE, OREGON 97401
\
\
\
\
\
\
\\
'\
~M
"
, -
"-
i[
--"
HI-
\
,
\
'\
\
\
'\
\
\
/ "",1- CA >-'
~ \
\
\
'f'1 b: b-
\
\
\ '.
*~{j Itll &>/{....
~I,-,I,
, - IV,-
..;~
0( P Eft. rz
S COM
I
TEL: (541) 484-9080