HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication PLANNER 7/8/2008
:City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE
PRE-SUBMII I AL CHECKLIST
Partition
Project Name: Benson
Project Proposal: partition
Case Number: PRE2007-00085
Project Address: 58 and A
,;
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number{s): 17-02-33-41 TL 201
Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR)
Overlay District{s):
Applicable Refinement Plan: NjA
Refinement Plan Designation: N/A
Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR)
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date:
Application Submittal Deadline: July 8, 2008
Associated Applications:
I CITY OF SPRJNGFIELI~t DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
I POSITION REVIEW OF
I Project Planner Land Use Planning
Transportation Planninq Enqineer Transportation
Utilities
Sanitary & Storm Sewer
Fire and Life Safety
Building
I Deputy Fire Marshal
I Community Services Manaqer
NAME
Steve Hopkins
Gary McKenney
Jesse Jones
Jesse Jones
Gilbert Gordon
Dave Puent
APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Applicant Applicant's Representative
Vern Benson Dave Collier
940 Hwy 99N, ' . . Pacific Surveying
Eugene OPR 97402 75506 Blue Mtn School Road
Cottage Grove OR 97424
Revised 10/25/07
PHONE
726-3649
726-4585
736-1036
736-1036
726-2293
726-3668
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
,
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees
o Copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 81/2"x 11"
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
o
~
8 V2" x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report Issued within the past 30 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~
o
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional informatIon that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
o ~ Brief Narrative
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~
D
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land
Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92
City boundaries, the Urban Growth
Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which
cross or abut the property
Location and width of all existing and
proposed easements on and abutting the
property
Boundaries of the entire area owned by the
property owner, of which the proposed land
division IS a part, as well as dimensions and
size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating
the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
~
D
~
D
~
D
ReVised 10/25/07
2
~
D
Location, widths and names of all existing
and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or
other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the
proposed land division. Proposed streets
should also include approximate radius of
curves and grades and relationship to any
projected streets as shown on the Metro
Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development
Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map
Location of existing and required traffic
control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,'
transformers, neighborhood mailbox Units
and similar public facilities
Location of existing and proposed street
lighting, including type, height, and area of
illumination
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
Location of existing and proposed transit
facilities
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
Location, size, and type of plantings and
street trees in any required planter strip
The locations of all areas to be dedicated or
reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition, or limitations of the reservations
clearly indicated
Location and size of existing and proposed
utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater
management systems, water mains, power,
gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the
proposed connection points.
~
D
~
D
~
D
~
~
D\
D
~
D
~
D
~
D
o Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as
specified In SDC 5.12-120 E.
Complete
Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
[g]
o
Future Development Plan
Revised 10/25/07
3
Planning Notes:
./
1. A narrative is required. It should generally describe the proposed improvements and
any unique features/issues of the site.
2. Tl:l~nllaP'lelle i!S: sho'.vn 28" 'Iv"j.Q3. Thg required :7:i:-:ifflttm i:; e:-:~a', CRangc if -
desirerl. ~€t :-equ:..eEh
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
~
· A new Springfield Development Code was adopted on Sept 18, 2007. All references
should be to the new code.
/
K-<? mtU t.. f lJ C q'l J r f de d 'Cq Ie q!j ~ fr (tJ q:fe -<-Ii ~-e;J/I e?/
r'
Revised 10/25/07
4
ANY REQUIRED'ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANrS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR
APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable Not
Applicable
0 ~
D ~
D ~
o
~
~
o
o
~
o
~
o
~
~
o
o
~
o
~
o
~
Revised 10/25/07
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's
Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster
Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses
(WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct
tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently if there, are unstable soils and/or a high
water table present
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address
the additional standards of the overlay district
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland
on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or evidence the permit application has been
submitted for review
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted prior to development
An Annexation application, as speCified in SDC 5.7-100, where a
development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the
City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer
All public improvert:lents proposed to be installed and to include
the approximate time,of installation and method of financing
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified
in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100
5
THIS APPLICATION IS:
D COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
r:sJ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
L
-:5t
City Planner
/
\/75:J06
Datel .
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4-
105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land
use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day
processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or
when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either
signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the
date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information.
If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be
submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-
Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit
the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee,
the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and
begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of
the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day
processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day
period for a reasonable period of time. ,The City may also require additional fees if the new
information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out
and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the
application proposal and additional review is required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City within the lBO-day timeline.
"-<~
Owner/Applicant's Signature
I-~-a\
Date
ReVised 10/25/07
6
I
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Matt Stouder Case#: PRE2007-00085
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
[8J 0
[8J 0
[8J 0
[8J
o
[8J
o
[8J
o
~
o
~
o
Revised 10/25/07
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
Vicinity Map
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use and
required setbacks from proposed property lines
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 1f2 feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently If the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
and/or a high water table
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See PW
, Note(s)
[2J
D
D
[g]
1,2,3
[2J
D
[2J
D
[2J
D
o Stormwater Management Plan
~omplete
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
[2J
[2J
D
D
~
[2J
[2J
D
D
D
4
[2J
D
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
Location and width of all existing and proposed
I
easements on and abutting the property
I
Boundaries of the entire are1 owned by the property
owner, of which the propose~d land division is a part,
as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of ~ach building site
indicating the top and toe of, cut and fill slopes to
I
scale I
Location of existing and req~ired power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stor01water managert,ent systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by,a1 Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
I
part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and b'SCharge locations
Pervious and impervious are1a drainage patterns
The size and location of stor~water management
I
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, drY wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality ~easures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
EXisting and proposed spot elevatIons and contours
,
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land With a slope
over 10 percent, the contou~ lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
D ~ Amount of proposed cut and[ fill
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4): copies of the study with
the completed Storf!lwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
ReVised 10/25/07
!
i
I
I
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Desig~ Standards and
Procedures Manual. '
Complete
Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
[;g]
o
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
PW Notes:
1. There is a conflict between the Tentative Partition Plat plan ~nd the Engineering
plans. Specifically, the partition plat plans show an existing 7 foot Public Utility
Easement located where the engineering plans show a ~roposed 7 foot private
utility easement. City records indicate the 7 foot PUE d6es exist as shown on the
tentative plat. Location of private facilities within a PUE is not permitted.
2. The plans show a proposed 7 foot PUE along the property's street frontage. City
records Indicate a 5 foot PUE currently exists along the property frontage.
3. The partition plat plan shows the propsoed joint access easement at 28 feet while the
engineering drawings depict the easement at 26 feet in Width. ,
4. The runoff from the driveway will need to be collected prior to entering the City
system. ,City specifications do not allow driveway runoff to sheet flow over the
sidewalk.
5.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
· The proposed sanitary sewer c1eanout near the new drivewc y may require a "wye"
prior to utelizing the three individual private lines.
Revised 10/25/07
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Transportation Engineer: Jon Driscoll Case#: PRE2007-00085
Applicant: Vern Benson
TRANSPORTATION
o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
ComplE7te Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
~ D
Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application
o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA.. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
~
D
Traffic Impact Study
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
0'
~
D
~
1
Location of existing and proposed street
lighting, including type, height, and area
of illumination
Location of existing and proposed transit
facilities
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
Lotation, widths, conditions, and names of
all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within
or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include
approximate radius of curves and grades
and relationship to any projected streets
~
D
D
~
2
~
o
ReVised 10/25/07
~
D
as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan,
Conceptual Development Plan, or
Conceptual Local Street Map
Location of existing and required traffic
control devices
Transportation Notes:
1. The driveway width is not shown.
2. Location and width of the existing sidewalks is not shown.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
.
Revised 10/25/07
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION AP~;LICATION
I,
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKL:tST
Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon
,
Case, #: PRE2007-00085
FIRE
o Tentative Land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See Fire
\ Note(s)
~ ~
I3J
M*l
L.l.Ul
Location, widths and names of all eXisting and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within ~r adjacent to t0e proposed land division
Location of existing and required fire hydrants
Fire Notes:
1.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
· Na-f.JJ.l:: ;.iCiI ii ,;;", ,~. r
I. ''/.Jv P~-h~~'-7J:::), ",;0 ~ 1-'j,~oR",~wy
r
Revised 9/24/07