HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 4/2/2008
~
.~
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
~~@~DW~-:'
J APR 2 2008 ...J
By}l~02' ~Uf]
STATE OF OREGON)
) ss
County of Lane )
I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows
1 I state that I am a Program TechnicIan for the Planning DivIsIon of the
Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon.
2. I state that In my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and caused to be
mailed copies of SCJ(32008~DODl2... 1l~ dlJ 7'l(J,(i~A;/Ok... - p~ ~ -
(See attachment "A") on 4\ 'Z- . 2008 addressed to (see Wt.It.f'
Attachment B"), by causing saId letters to be placed In a U S. mall box With
postage fully prepaId thereon.
:A~UR~~
STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane
4fiJ '>' f
. 2008 Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur,
Program TechniCian, who acknowledged the foregoing Instrument to be their voluntary
act Before me
-
OFFICIAL SEAL
BRENDA JONES
NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON
COMMISSION NO 379218 f
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES fMY 27, 2008 i
._,
~
."
~ -
My CommIssion Expires ~ 'J1 ;}cttJ!
Notice of Decision - Partition Tentative Plan
Project Name: Wrrfs parbbon
Project Proposal: dIvIde one lot mto two parcels
Case Number: SUB2008-00012
Project Location: 1360 S Street, 17-03-25-23 TL1801
Property size: 17,500 sf
Base Zone: LDR By
Overlay District(s): Drmkmg Water Protecbon Overlay, 1-5 year bme of travel zone
Metro Plan Designation: Low DensIty ResIdenbal
Refinement PlanfDesignation: Q Street Refmement Plan/Low DensIty ResIdenbal
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Application Submitted Date: February 19, 2008
Decision Issued Date: April 2, 2008
Appeal Deadline Date: April 17, 2008
Other Application(s) none
~~@~Oill~~
APR 2 2008
...-/
I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
I POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE
Project Manager Plannmg Steve HopkIns 726-3649
I Transportabon Plannmg Engmeer Transportabon Gary McKenney 726-4585
Pubhc Works EIT Ubhbes, Sarutary & Jesse Jones 736-1036
Storm Sewer
Deputy Frre Marshall Frre and We Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293
Commumty ServIces Manager Bmldmg Dave Puent 726-3668
I APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Owner/Applicant: Representative:
Thomas and DIane Wrrfs Jeanette Applauso
Cozy Homes Branch Engmeenng
PO Box 37 310 FIfth Street
SprmgfIeld OR 97477 Spnngheld OR 97477
Wirfs
Case No SUB200B-000 /2
,,'
~~@~Q\TI~'\_
\.; . APR 2 2008
Ul -'
Site:
.~I
Proposed Partition
Summary of proposal: DIvide one lot mto two parcels The eXlStmg dwelling will remam
Decision: Tentative Approval with condihons, as of the date of tlus letter The standards of
the Spnngbeld Development Code (SDC) apphcable to each cntenon of approval are hsted
herem and are sahsfted by the subnutted plans and notes unless spectbcally noted With fmdmgs
and conmbons necessary for comphance The Fmal Plat must conform to the subnutted plans
as conmboned herem Th.ts 18 a hnuted land use dec18lon made accordmg to City code and state
statutes Unless appealed, the deCISion 18 fmal Please read tlus document carefully
Other Uses Authorized by the Decision: None Future development will be m accordance with
the proVISlOns of the SDC, hIed easements and agreements, and all apphcable local, state and
federal regulabons
Review Process. Th.ts apphcabon 18 reviewed under Type II procedures listed m SDC 51-130,
the Tentabve Plan Cntena of Approval, SDC 512-125, and the Land DIvIsion Standards of
Arbcle 5 12-100
Wirfs
Case No SUB2 008-000/2
2
Procedural Findings:
. ApplIcabons for Lmuted Land Use DecISIOns reqUIre the no property
owners/ occupants WIthm 300 feet of the subject property allowmg for a 14 day
comment penod on the applIcabon (SDC Secbons 51-130 and 52-115) The applIcant
and parbes subrmtbng wntten comments durmg the nobce penod have appeal nghts
and are maIled a copy of tills deCISIon for consIderabon
rC~~~\~'
~ .' ~ 1\)\)~ ~
~ \ ~\>R
U'
. Nobce was sent to adjacent property owners/occupants WIthm 300 feet of the subJect
SIte on February 27, 2008
. On March 19, 2008, the CIty'S Development ReVIew Comrmttee revIewed the proposed
plans City staff's reVIew comments have been reduced to fmdmgs and condtbons only
as necessary for complIance WIth the Tentabve Plan Cntena of Approval contamed m
SDC 5 12-125 'flus deCISIOn was ISsued on the 42nd day of the 120 days mandated by the
state
. In accordance WIth SDC 512-145, the Fmal Plat shall comply WIth the reqUIrements of
the SDC and the condtbons rmposed by the Drrector m tlus deCISIon The Fmal Plat
otherwISe shall be m substanbal conformance WIth the tentabve plan reVIewed Porbons
of the proposal approved as subrmtted durmg tentabve reVIew cannot be substanbvely
changed dUrIng Fmal Plat approval
Comments Received: The applIcant and parbes subrmtbng wntten comments durmg the
nobce penod have appeal nghts and are rna1led a copy of tlus deCISIon for consIderabon See
Appeals, page 8 of tlus report
One comment was receIved from Curbs Grohs, 1349 S Street The full text of Mr Groh's
comments are made a part of tills record by reference here and are avaIlable for reVIew upon
request HIS concerns mcluded potenbal damage to lus property, parkmg, and the central
maIlboxes
Staff reSDonse:
. If any damage occurs durmg construcbon, It IS a CIVU matter that should be
addressed drrectly WIth the applIcant or the applIcant's representabve Therr contact
mformabon IS on the frrst page of tills report
. In accordance WIth SDC 46-125, a smgle farruly dwellmg requrres two parkIng
spaces The proposed land dtVIsIon will create two lots that contam adequate area
on each lot to meet tills reqUIrement, therefore, the parkIng area standard has been
met by the proposed parbbon Pavrng of the reqUIred parkIng will be venbed pnor
to Issuance of a bmldmg perrmt
. 'flus proposal IS to dtVIde the property mto two parcels and retam the eXISbng
dwellmg No plans have been subrmtted for development of the vacant parcel Any
development must comply WIth the LDR (Low DensIty ResIdenbal) Zone If
attached homes are proposed, a nobce will be sent to the surroundmg property
owners to allow parbClpabon m that deCISIon
Wirfs
Case No SUB200B-000 /2
3
"r r:: (]~ rr r> \~; rc: - "~I
Ill'":!!)I G U \:J u.;
\ \' J b,
I
APR 2 2008 ~.
\ "',
, 'I
, \,
1,\
UL'
,By. " ----Ti.-..:iC i....c: four maIlboxes at the wes~em edge of the property Locahon or relocahon
of the boxes must be coordmated WI,th the post offIce The apphcant has not
mdIcated the boxes will be relocated
SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon
determining that all applicable criteria have b~en satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to
,
satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shal!l deny the application. In the case of Partitions
that involve the donation of land to a publi~ agency, the Director may waive any approval
criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future
development application.
A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and
dimensions.
Finding: The proposed parcels comply WIth the drmenslOnal standards of the LDR
(Low DensIty Resldenhal) Zone
Conclusion: The proposal comphes WIth SDC 512-125(A)
B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement
Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Cbnceptual Development Plan.
Finding: The Metro Plan and the Q str~et RefInement Plan deSIgnate tlus area as Low
DensIty Resldenhal The SIte IS zoned ~DR As proposed, the project will conshtute a
densIty of 497 dwellmgs per acre, wluch comphes WIth the goal of 1-10 dwellmgs per
acre m the LDR deslgnahon
Conclusion The proposal comphes WIth SDC 5 12-125(B)
C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to,
water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stuu....water management facilities; and streets
and traffic safety controls shall not bel exceeded and the public improvements shall be
available to serve the site at the time ~f development, unless otherwise provided for by
this Code and other applicable re~ations. The Public Works Director or a utility
provider shall determine capacity issuJs.
Finding: Abutbng the subject SIte '5' S~eet IS a 20-foot WIde paved roadway WIthIn a 60-
I
foot WIde nght of way The street has no curb/ gutter or SIdewalk rmprovements A low
pressure sodIum street hght IS located bn the north SIde of '5' Street OppOSIte the
I
northwest comer of the subject property Average daIly traffIC along tlus street IS
eshmated to be less than 300 velucle trIpS per day
I
Finding: Based on ITE Land Use Code '210 (Smgle-Fanuly Detached Housmg)
I
development of an addIhonal parcel on the property would generate 10 addIhonal
Wirfs
Case No SUB2tJ08-000 /2
4
velucle trIpS per day and 1 PM peak-hour velucle trIp onto the surrounW1 street
system
Finding- The eXIStmg low pressure sochum street hghtmg on '5' Street does not meet
current CIty desIgn standards, wluch call for lugh pressure sochum hghtmg fIxtures
EXIStmg and future velucular and pedestrIan traffIc created by development of the
subject property contrIbute to the need for pavmg, curb/ gutter, sIdewalk and street
hghtmg Improvements to current CIty standards on '5' Street The lack of these
Improvements abutbng the property makes construchon of Improvements on the
property frontage econonucally and techmcally Imprachcal at tlus bIDe Execuhon of an
Improvement Agreement for these Improvements IS warranted m accordance WIth
proVISIOns of SDC 4 2-105 G 2
PUBLIC STREETS, SIDEWALKS & IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS
FindIng: Sechon 42-105 G 2 of the Sprmgfleld Development Code reqUITes that
whenever a proposed land chVISlon or development will mcrease traffIC on the City
street system and that development has any urumproved street frontage abutbng a fully
Improved street, that street frontage shall be fully Improved to City specIfIcahons
Excephon (1) notes that m cases of urumproved streets, an Improvement Agreement
shall be reqUITed as a conchhon of Development Approval postponmg Improvements
unbl such bIDe that a CIty street Improvement project IS rmhated
Condition of Avvroval #1. Pnor to approval of the fInal plat, execute an Improvement
agreement for ImProvements m the nght of wav of "s" Street, mcludmg curb, gutter,
sIdewalk and street hghtmg
Finding: The apphcant has proposed a 7 0' P U E along the frontage of Parcels 1 and 2
adjacent to "5" St
Finding- Accordmg to SUB, pole #54075 m the NE comer of the property belongs to
Qwest and IS too small to support electrIcal eqUIpment The developer has two ophons
to brmg power to the SIte
. Trench across S Street to the eXIStmg pole #64048 and set a Junchon box m the 7'
PUE,or
. Set a new pole m the 7' P U E between parcels 1 and 2 so the eXIstmg dwellmg
and future dwellmg can trench to It
CondItion of Approval #2: Pnor to approval of the fInal plat, IdentIfy how electnCItv
will be extended to each lot and grant easements as needed
SANITARY SEWER
Finding: Parcell IS served by an eXIStmg sewer lateral from the 8" sewer mam located
m 5 Street The apphcant proposes to serve parcel 2 WIth a sarutary sewer lateral from
the 8" mam located m "5" Street as shown on the Tentahve Parhhon Map
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT
Finding The apphcant proposes to contmue to allow roof runoff from Parcell to
chscharge Via splash blocks as noted m the apphcahon narrahve
Wirfs
Case No SUB200B-000 /2
5
A~/ ~~o~J
Finding: 'be apphcant IS proposmg an mdIVIdual drywell to retam the roof runoff from
I
_tbp P~1'ool-~ as noted on the TentatIve PartItIon Map
.---- .~- I
Conclusion: As condItIoned, the proposal comphes wIth SDC 5 12-125(C)
'r ~
: I) \;:J
, ,
\ '\ \
, "
UL
B"
D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private
design and construction standards ~ontained in this Code and other applicable
regulations.
Finding: SDC SectIon 4 3-125 requrres all uhhty lmes to be placed underground,
I
mcludmg those lmes servmg eXIStIng drellings As noted on the tentatIve plan,
overhead uhhtIes for the eXIStIng dwelling will be placed underground
Condition of Approval #3: The overheJd uhhtIes to the eXIStIng- dwelling- shall be
- .. --
placed undenrround
Conclusion: The proposal comphes Wit 1 SDC 5 12-125(D)
E.
Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or
geologic conditions; areas with susceRtibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees
and shrubs; watercourses shown on thJ WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas;
wetlands; rock outcroppings; open sp~ces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological
sigmficance, as may be specified in S~ction 3.3-900 or ORS 97740-760, 358.905-955 and
390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law.
Finding The Natural Resources Study, ~the NatIonal Wetlands Inventory, the SprmgfIeld
Wetland Inventory Map, and the hst of HIstonc Landmark SItes were consulted No
I
lustonc or cultural resources have been'IdentIDed on tlus SIte
I
Conclusion: The proposal comphes With SDC 5 12-125(E)
F.
Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular
traffIC, bicycle and pedestrian safety t6 avoid congestion; provide connectivity within
the development area and to adjace:dt residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood
activity centers, and commercial, ind~strial and public areas; minimize driveways on
arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and
comply with the ODOT access managebent standards for State highways.
I
Finding: In accordance WIth SDC 4 6-1t5, each dwelling requrres two parkIng spaces
The proposed land dIVISIon will create two lots that contam adequate area on each lot to
I
meet tlus requrrement For the new dwelling, tlus requrrement will be vermed pnor to
Issuance of a bmldmg pernut
Conclusion: The proposal comphes With SDC 5 12-125(F)
G.
Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be
accomplished as specified in this Cod~.
I
Finding: There IS no adjacent property 'under the same ownerslup
I
Conclusion: The proposal comphes With SDC 512-125(G)
Wir(s
Case Na SUB2C 08-000/2
6
~ ~ @ [E C ill ~ -~
"APR 2 2008
-/
H.
Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allq~ its development
as specified in this Code. @.i~ - -
Fmding: The surroundmg properbes are developed WIth smgle fanuly dwellmgs
Conclusion: The proposal comphes WIth SDC 5 12-125(H)
I.
Where the Partition of property that is outSIde of the city limits but within the CIty'S
urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the
standards specified below shall also apply.
Finding: The SIte I~ rnsIde the CIty hnuts
Conclusion: The proposal comphes WIth SDc 512-125(1)
J.
Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is
proposed, the following approval criteria apply
Finding: TIus IS not a subdIVISIon of a manufactured home park
Conclusion. The proposal comphes WIth SDC 512-125(J)
DhlhRMINATION: Based on the evidence in the record. the Director determines the
proposal complies with SDC 5.12-125lA)-(J). subiect to the Conditions of Approval attached
- - - - -
to tlus report.
What Needs To Be Done?
SDC 512-140 states The subdivision Plat pre-submittal meeting shall be held within 2 years
of the date of Tentative Plan approval (the date of tIns letter) The mylars and application fee
shall be submitted within 180 days of the pre-submittal meeting. If the applicant has not
submitted the Partition Plat within these times, Tentative Plan approval shall become null
and void and re-submIttal of the Tentative Plan shall be required.
A Fmal Plat apphcabon IS charged upon subnuttal of the complete apphcabon and all reqUITed
documents, and after all condIbons of approval are met, mcludmg the construcbon of pubhc
and pnvate rmprovements and extensIOn of utIhbes reqUITed through tlus deCISIon Upon
SIgnature by the CIty Surveyor and the Plannmg Manager, the Plat mylar may be subnutted to
Lane County for recordabon No individual lots may be transferred until the Plat is recorded
and the mylar copy of the filed Partition is returned to the City Surveyor.
Summarv of ConditIons of Approval
- -
To the extent necessary to sahsfy the approval cntena of Secbon 512-125, comply WIth all
apphcable proVISIOns of tlus Code and to nubgate IdentIhed negabve rmpacts to surroundmg
properbes, the DIrector shall rmpose approval condIbons Unless other wise noted, all
condItions shall be satisfied prior to Plat approval.
CondItion of Approval #1 Pnor to approval of the fmal plat. execute an rmprovement
- - - - -
agreement for rmprovements m the rw.:ht of way of "S" Street. mcludm2: curb. QUtter.
SIdewalk and street hghbng
Wirfs
Case No SUB200B-000 /2
7
r \... ( J I I In ~
;',i~ L~ Lt; iJ l!J U;-;
'" 1[
I ; APR
JL
2 2008 I
--./
Conmti m of AODroval #2: Pnor to aDDroval of the fInal Dlat, Idenhfv how electncltv
,,;',.ill-be-t.AL.::.lldecl to each lot and Qrant ~~sements as need~d
----- I
Condition of ADDroval #3: Pnor to aDDtoval of the fInal Dlat the overhead ubhhes to
the eXlShn2: dw~llm2: shall be placed ~aenrround -
- - ~-
8:
Additional Information: The apphcahon, all documents, and eVIdence rehed upon by the
apphcant, and the apphcable cntena of approv 11 are avaIlable for free mspechon and copIes are
avaIlable for a fee at the Development Sen Ices Department, 225 FIfth Street, Sprmgfleld,
Oregon
Appeal: 'flus Type II Tentahve deCISIOn may be appealed to the Planrung comrmssIOn The
appeal may be fIled WIth the Development ServIces Department by an affected party The
appeal must be m accordance With SDC, Se~tion 5.3-100, Appeals An Appeals apphcahon
must be subrmtted to the CIty WIth a fee of $250 00 The fee will be returned to the appellant If
the Planrung ComrmssIOn approves the appeal apphcahon
In accordance With SDC 5 3-115(B) wluch prpVIdes for a 15-day appeal penod and Oregon
Rules of cIVll Procedures, Rule 10(c) for serv .ce of nohce by mall, the appeal penod for tlus
deCISIon expIres at 5:00 p.m. on April 17, 2008.
Questions: Please call Steve HopkIns m the Planrung DIVISIon of the Development ServIces
Department at (541) 726-3649 If you have any queshons regardmg tlus process
Prepared by:
Steve HopkIns, AIcP
Planner II
Development ServIces - Urban Planrung DlVlS~on
, Wirfs
Case No SU82( 08-000/2
8
'~rf (7
\~ &
:\r: APR
n~~\
2 2008 J
-\
:By--
~
---_. ---
f
I
-.-..~
"""~u..o
~"'-----'~
'';'' L' '~~ .:,i:s.".:~:'''''~;~~'''''J.'-K:';i.--;.,~
I
"'-~"~.":~":'_:"-.-.~'... -.':
c]
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 5th ST
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
""]
~_f~'-,Li'~"".,
..J
L;".....~,,,..,,..,,,.,._
Curtls Grohs
1349 S Street
Sprlngfleld, OR 97477
'I'J!.~~., l'_~ ........""d'......Ul......J,:"...~"'"'...-._-\!oL._.!ro\..i'."".".._':".,_"..."''''''''~"'~"....U1'.'._',.,' " ,:,. ....,.,......,,"'., "I!I":'_"=,'''-""'':'":'''''''
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 5th ST
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
~~'."'---",~.~,
. ---~~~
- ""
-".-1iIt,'_~1" ".
.,."""",-,,,-
Jeanette Applauso
Branch Englneerlng
310 lHfth Street
Sprlngfleld, OR 97477
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 5th ST
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
Ib4......~""I!~~lllL~.Jia,;,.,~.
Thomas and Dlane Wlrfs
Cozy Homes
PO Box 37
Sprlngfleld, OR 97477
~ 1(6((
1
J