Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 5/22/2008 IOty of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tree Felling Permit equired Project Information ' : . (~pJ.'licant: complete this section) Applicant Name: DennIs Murphy Phone: 726-3737 Company: Address: I CIty of SprIngfield Fax: 726-2297 225 5th Street, SprIngfield, OR 97477 Applicant's Rep.: Carol StIneman Phone: 726-4658 Company: Address: I CIty of SprIngfield Fax: 736-1021 225 5th Street, Sprmgfield, OR 97477 Property Owner: CIty of SprIngfield Phone: 726-4658 Company: Address: I CIty of SprIngfield Fax: 736-1021 225 5th Street, SprIngfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17023533 TAX LOT NO(S): 06204 Property Address: 6853 MaIn Street, Sprmgfield, OR 97477 Size of Property: 1 +/- Acres ~ SQuare Feet 0 I Description of If you are filling In thiS form by hand, please attach your proposal deSCription to thiS application Proposal: Remove trees for the constructIon of the Thurston FIre StatIOn #16 - P20534 , ,.- Associated Cases: Si9ns: Case No.: J fL(, AOO~ - (J):)!;,S Application Fee: $ I fS~ TOTAL FEES: $ I & ~ '3. gO I Date: S'/ :rl-I O( . . Reviewed by: 11 ,1fi1~ 1 gO Technical Fee: $ ~ Postage Fee: $ 1'65 PROJECT NUMBER: PRS 2-oo1-o00gq Date Received: MAY 2 2 2008 Original submittal ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 6 Signatures The undersigned acknowledges that the information In this application IS correct and accurate, Applicant: Date: tlS /21 jt;rp, Ca YQj ..-J. ~ ~ h Vl~ A'Yl/1/n Print Owner: If the applicant IS not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act In his/her behalf ~ MvwIp~ Murph! , Date: OS/2-I 10 8 I Signature VeV'()fIS Print Date Received: MAY 2 2 2008 Tree Felling Permit Application Process Original Submittal 1. Applicant Submits a Tree Felling Permit Application to the Development Services Department · The application must conform to the Tree Fellmg Permit Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 4 of this application packet. · Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required Items listed in the Tree Felling Permit Submittal Requirements ChecklIst have been submitted. · Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check · Planning DivIsion staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of submittal. · The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. · An application IS not be deemed technically complete until all Information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, ItS Impacts, and its compliance with the prOVISions of the Spnngfleld Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. · Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result In denial. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision · This is a Type II decIsion and thus IS made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. · Mailed notice IS provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 2 of 6 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone rHy of Springfield Official Receipt tvelopment Services Department Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 3200800000000000349 Date: OS/22/2008 9:44:19AM Job/Journal Number DRC2008-00035 DRC2008-00035 DRC2008-00035 DescrIption CTY > 1 0 Trees Base + Per ACRE Postage Fee Type II - $155 + 5% Technology Fee Payments: Type of Payment INT CHGS Paid By 420-62224-810046-P20534 Item Total: Check Number AuthorIzation ReceIved By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 1,456 00 15500 72 80 $1,683.80 Amount Paid INTFIRE In Person Payment Total: $1,68380 $1,683.80 ~~ d~~#-l(o Ok Date Received: 65/2-2)08 MAY 2 2 2008 Original Submittal cRecelOt I Page I of I 5/22/2008 I I I I I I I ~ M,A,IN &TR..T . MclC:lIN%l. HIGl-fWA.'I'" (HICirI-lW,A,'r' 126 ) ( .~.~ ,,,. -.,:.", . ~: III Ii il I ,. i .- 4'"" , ~~~".;~:7--,- --T '- ~. ..{ .;" ~!'~o~~,! ,-~'" .: '""_ ,.-z:-T" ~ ~7 ,.. I :-/'/r-'--'--'r-'--'--'~l'--'~-'-'-'~ f It\. .; . 1 .:. \ r-~' .'. ,':;" I ' I , ~ . r ' , I i 1~~.I;~i '0/<'>" '-':d ~ -', ~l:- ",)! : ~~..'(, ." if'.>1 r.c::, "'<, . i" \ I I-~ t - ,~!.I'-] , lr -~ ~ i"III~~I~" O' r" '....,,;.'.., ...,."",_,.:1 t. "-rI'~W"'-" I , li'\, .,., I ' l' ~ .'~', ~ Ii" I I r~' " I I, " 1. ,f. I, i 1~' ' '~...."I :,:,'. I: I': ~ \ . -II "-:i':": ' >'J ;( r~;111 \ I , I' 1 I~ \ I I I <.\ , I '. ! ~ I ~ : '1 i I . f , l~ j ! i I '~ ("A -- (1 'i ~.{ '::.' .i i dl' I~i i d \J I! ~ . ,j I~t ="~.~ ;~{ · "I 'I.(,'~i :1 \4' It, ()I J < 'I - 1'1 ~ r i ~~ '1' . ll! .,;l ! J' " ~ l' I i 1. , i~! I', '.A] -, ' L J' I I.' I; .:, II ['1i' ~I ;~ 1 '1 I II, - I, l:'" : J' ,1/ ", Ii ~ ,~ i 1 ,I I l . l I I I ~ :~rllr ~_'tu.'\ ;.~- ----u..x-.. '~- - ~{J. 0 )"': I I '.1~::;?, ~ /t/, = .<,' J' il"/ , ~ ~ ~ t I 1\ .--. -.--.-- --.--.--.- . ~ J \' ' '" " j, I I I'. " --.-< " LmllNO e V EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN TREES TO BE REMOVED DUE CONsmUCTION '. .r;" f(l" ..~ F~~ .. t ~.-" TREE PROTECTION FENCING Date Received: MAY 2 2 2008 ( ~..'l. ~;' Original Submittal -~ Sd1le1ln!J<'l' + ^..oclal.... ",. .......c... .....".e '.'1 .". D.II.... 1101 WI.mltt. st.. Slh. 210 ElIQIne, 0ft90/IIn01 Pho",:[5041174HII61 r..:(S<lllr43~16!l Web:Il'n~J:arn addition, the al--.--.lcant must post one sign, provldeu oy the City, on the subject property. . There IS a 14-day public comment period, staring on the date notice IS mailed. · Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated Into a decIsion that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. . Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. . The City malls the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which IS effective on the day It IS mailed. · The decIsion issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Tree Felling Permit Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an Item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ~ Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review or Land DIvIsion applications, where applicable. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees ar~ d' collected at the time of complete application submittal. Date Receive . Tree F~lIing Permit Application Form MAY 2 2 2008 Copy of the Deed (already provided to project planner) Original submittal. Copy of a Preliminary Title Report Issued within the past 30 days aocumenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. (already provided to project planner) Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearing In determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with the Tree Felling Permit Criteria as specified in SDC 5.19-125 (see page 4 of this application). The proposed tree felling IS part of the site improvements and construction of the Thurston Fire Station #16 Project - P20534. This project has been approved by City staff and the City Council. The existing station will be demolished and replaced by a new bUilding. In addition, extensive site work has been identified including pavement replacement, installation of a sanitary/storm switching valve, construction of stormwater pretreatment bioswales, removal of existing berms along the south and east property boundaries, addition of new public driveway and parking, covered/paved dumpster enclosure, and fire operations training area. Nineteen of the trees to be removed are on top of two berms which will be removed to prevent stormwater Intrusion onto adjacent properties. One berm will be replaced with a stormwater pretreatment bloswale. The remaining seven trees to be removed are in the footprint of the new bUilding, public driveway, or other improved areas. NOTE: Before the Director can Issue a Tree Felling Permit, information submitted by the applicant must adequately support the request. All of the Tree Felling Permit Criteria must Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 3 of 6 be addressed by the c...-r.!llcant. Incomplete applications, c.:> well as insuffiCient or unclear data, will delay the applIcation review process and may result In denial. In certain circumstances, it is advisable to hire a professional planner or land use attorney to prepare the required findings. The Director or the Public Works Director may require the applicant to provide the services of a professional forester (approved by the City), licensed hydrologist, or licensed landscape architect In order to address the standards in SDC 5.19-125 for undeveloped property greater than 10 acres in size or 15% slope or above an elevation of 670 feet. Three (3) Copies of a Plot Plan drawn to scale to include: (alread'y pro'tLdede1.cvBcp'ject planner) Date Kec IZl The species or common name of the trees MAY 2 2 2008 IZl The location of trees to be removed and their sizes IZl The method of tree removal and th~ hauling route to be usedOrigina\ submIttaL IZl A description of any plan (Vegetation and Re-vegetation Report) to replace, landscape, or otherwise reduce the effect of the felling that addresses the applicable criteria in \' SDC 5.19-125. IZl Copy of the Plot Plan Reduced to 8V2" X 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notifica~ion packet. (already provided to project planner) IZl I 5.19-125 Criteria The Director, In consultation with the Public Works plrector and the Fire Chief shall approve, approve With conditions or deny the request based on the follOWing cntena' A. Whether the conditions of the trees With respect to disease, hazardous or unsafe conditions, danger of failing, proximity to eXisting structures or proposed construction, or Interference With utility services or pedestnan or vehicular traffiC safety warrants the proposed felling The site IS bounded by Main St to the north, 68th PI to the east, an undeveloped parcel to the south which IS currently occupied by fire operations, and a pnvate residence to the east Within thiS area all trees fall In the path of construction of the new bUildings, pedestnan or vehicular paving and/or their associated Infrastructure work B. Whether the proposed felling IS consistent With State standards, Metro Plan poliCies and City Ordinances and provIsions affecting the environmental quality of the area, including but not limited to, the protection of nearby trees and Windbreaks, Wildlife, erOSion, SOil retention and stability, volume of surface runoff and water quality of streams, scenic quality, and geological sites No trees outside of thiS site Will be affected, and all trees removed from thiS site will be replaced With appropnate species as shown on the construction documents All landscaped areas Will be covered With vegetation Including trees, shrubs and ground covers Most of the paved site surfaces also drain Into City of Spnngfleld approved Blo-Swales for pretreatment pnor to input Into the City's storm water system C. Whether It IS necessary to remove trees In order to construct proposed Improvements as specified In an approved development plan, grading permits and construction drawings The trees outlined In thiS tree felling permit must be removed to allow for the construction of the Thurston Fire Station #16 All trees identified for removal fall In the path of construction of the Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 4 of 6 ' new bUildings, pt. Jstrlan or vehicular paving, or their assv\Aated Infrastructure work This project has been approved by City staff and the City Council D. In the event that no Development Plan has been approved by the City, felling of trees will be permitted on a limited basIs consistent With the preservation of the site's future development potential as prescribed In the Metro Plan and City development regulations, and consistent With the following cnterla 1. Wooded areas associated With natural dralnageways and water areas shall be retained to preserve riparian habitat and to minimize eroSion, N/A 2. Wooded areas that will likely provide attractive on-Site views to occupants of future developments shall be retaIned, N/A 3. Wooded areas along ridge lines and hilltops shall be retained for their scenic and wildlife value, N/A "'0 CD co > c::>> .CD ~ ~ 0 C".I Q) r..s "e 0::: ~ ..0 (J) :::J - :E en co (ij a c 'Cl .~ 0 4. Wooded areas along property lines shall be retained to serve as buffers from adjacent properties, 5. Trees shall be retained In suffiCiently large areas and dense stands so as to ensure against wlndthrow, N/A 6. Large-scale clear-cuts of developable areas shall be avoided to retain the wooded character of future bUilding Sites, and so preserve housing and design options for future City residents N/A E. Whether the applicant's' proposed replanting of new trees or vegetation IS an adequate substitute for the trees to be felled 19 new trees (see landscape plan) Will be planted In place of the 26 trees to be removed under thiS permit In addition to the trees, the site Will be planted With additional shrubs, ground cover, and vegetated stormwater bloswaJes F. Whether slash left on the property poses Significant fire hazard or liability to the City All felled trees and associated debriS Will be removed from the site uSing proper recycling, reuse, or disposal techniques G. Whether the felling IS consistent With the gUidelines specified In the Field GUide to Oregon Forestry Practices Rules published by the State of Oregon, Department of Forestry, as they apply to the northwest Oregon region Tree felling Will be done In a safe manner using qualified personnel uSing appropriate equipment and gear Every effort Will be made to Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 5 of 6 . ensure L ~ safety of cutting crews, bystanders arlu other personnel working m the vIcinity of the cutting operation, . minimize damage to residual trees and seedlings, . minimize damage to site, . properly dispose of trees at a compostmg facIlity H. Whether transportation of equipment to and equipment and trees from the site can be accomplished without a major disturbance to nearby residents The trees are located on a site that IS bounded by public ROW on the north and west sides, undeveloped property on the south side (currently occupied by fire operations), and a private residence on the east side Trees will be felled and cut Into transportable sizes with a chalnsaw The pieces will be hauled to appropriate wood recycling/reuse facIlities m Eugene/Springfield usmg City streets All work will take place dUring normal daylight busmess hours thus causmg little or no disturbance to nearby residents Date Received: MAY 22 2008 Original submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 6 of 6 ~ CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP DRC2008-00035 6853 Main Street f'~~TIl'ill; ~ - ~ ~ : ~-n.~~' - -'-~\' ~i~ .~. -~ :::~.~,,; ~ ~l y, "~0' ., - ~ ill'''' '" ,-,." iift." '.' ~ 'S' l' ~. @ ~ _~~ _:~ .>'. _,'%,,' - _." I i '" ,~,~., " . ~ ,:;---T ".; 7l w: ; lj p t Sll'J1.' - U'-^-IN ," '.;.c " ~" - --, ~?- t ~~ --;- v,1M '-&T- ~ ~~"-' ~MAJN-S-T-. (..,~ "'" ~ lu ~ ~'~ \w~ I ;"<;,&~ e ' "'-~_. w ~ " 'M' \- 8' :01 ~~ -;-, :_= ~~ : ;'~~t -AS_" --ER ~.'" ~ ., ~ ~9 - ~ i" ~ I ~ ~ fl: ~ ~ -L' ,- ;- L:),i; . ~ ~ " -~ 'F I ~ Date Received: MAY 22 2008 Original Submittal SITE Map 17-02-35-33 Tax Lot 6204 North .. .