The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 4/16/2008 (2) '. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DISTRIBUTION DATE: April 16, 2008 TO: Current Planning Staff: G. Ka.!Jl. J Donovan, L Pauly, T Jones, K Gale, M Metzger, L Miller,(ALimbird)D Reesor, S Hopkins, M Markarian Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Department I" Ken Vogeney, City Engineer, Public Works Department v Matt Stouder, AlC Engineering Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Jesse Jones, Public Works, Engineering Kristi Krueger, Civil Engineer, Public Works Department Brian Barnett, Traffic Engineer ~ Gary McKenney, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works v' Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Rre Marshall, Rre & Ufe Safety Department Melissa Fechtel, Fire & Life Safety Department _ Greg Ferschweiler, Maintenance, Public Works Department 7 Pat French, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District _/ Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald Peoples Utility District (EPUD) \/ Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) / Bart McKee, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board Mike Wilbur, ODOT Dave Puent, Building Official Will Mueller, L TD Norm Palmer, Quest Communications Tom Boyatt, Public Works '-/ Dennis Ernst, City Surveyor Jon Driscoll, Surveyor v Celia Barry,(Shashi Bajracharya) Lane County Transportation Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911 Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable Jerry Smith, Police Chief v Chuck Gottfried, Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Susie Smith, ESD Len Goodwin, Public Works Steve Barrett, Springfield School District 19, Superintendent / Joe Leahy, City Attorney George Walker, Storm water Facilities Planner, ESD Carole Knapel, PEACEHEAL TH/JUsnCE CENTER J.II:MS/FIRE STATION John Tamulonis, Economic Development Mgr. Courtney Griesel, Planner 1 (EDM) Bill Grile Dan Brown A Development Issues Meeting will take place on Thursday, May 15, 2008 @ 2:30 - 3:30 p.m. in the DSD Conference Room 616 @ Springfield City Hall. Please review the enclosed information, and come prepared to discuss this application with the Planner and applicant. Should you have any questions, please contact Andy Limbird @ (541) 726-3784. Date Received: APR 1 6 2008 Revised: 4-16-08 Original Submittal a x DEVELOPME~'l' ISSUES ~EE'l'I~G DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DSD Conference Room 616 Meeting Date: May 15, 2008 @ 2:30 - 3:30 p.m.. 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING #ZON2008-00021 MASON Assessor's Map: 18-02-06-24 TL 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000 Address: Vacant - S 32nd & Jasper Road Existing Use' Residential Applicant submitted plans to discuss annexing 12.3 acres into the City of Springfield for future development of 80-lot SFR subdivision. Planner: Andy Limbird Date ~eceived: APR 1 6 2008 Original Submittal a;:l 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541) 726-3753 FAX (541) 726-3689 WWW CI springfield or us April 16, 2008 John Mason 1920 NW 29th Place Corvallis, OR 97330 RE: ZON2008-00021 (18-02-06-24 TL 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000) Develvl'llJ.ent Issues Meeting - Applicant submitted plans to discuss annexing 12.3 acres into the City of Springfield for future development of an 80-lot SFR subdivision. Dear Mr. Mason: Thank you for your Develv.l'llJ.ent Issues Meeting submittal. The following meeting has been scheduled: TYPE: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING PLACE: Ltt "i OF SPRINGJ:llELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 616 225 J:lU-llt STREET SPRINGJ:I'lELD, OR 97477 DATEffIME: Thursday, May 15,2008 at 2:30 - 3:30 p.m. CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird If you have any questions, please call me at 541-726-3784 Sincerely, Andy Limbird Urban Planning CC: Alta and Seldon Mason 1920 NW 29th Place Corvallis, OR 97330 Richard Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI Satre Associates, P.C. 101 E Broadway, Ste 480 Eugene, OR 97401 Date Received: APR 1 6 2008 Original Submittal /J X- APR - 4 2008 ',City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Date Received: Development Issues Meeting (DIMi}inal Submittal Prospective Applicant Name: John L. Mason Company: Phone: (541) 602-2447 IFax: Address: 1920 NW 29th Place, Corvallis, Oregon 97330 I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI Company: Satre Associates, P.c. Phone: (541) 465-4721 Fax: (541) 465-4722 Address: I 101 East Broadway, SUite 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Alta Mason, Seldon Mason and John L. Mason Phone: (541) 602-2447 Company: Fax: Address: I 1920 NW 29th Place, Corvallis, Oregon 97330 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-06-24 Property Address: 3202 Jasper Road Size of Property: Approximately 12.3 acres Acres [Zl Square Feet D I . Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application Proposal: Annexation for Low-Density Residential development . TAX LOT NO(S): 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000 Existing Use: Vacant # of Lots/Parcels: 5 Prospective Applicant: Avg. ~t/Parcel Size: 107,158 sf Density: 0 / . dujacre - Date: 3 - a 6 - () ~ ~ure- ~6hlJ L YVlA ~dN Print Case No.: 3<'il1 /f))) 12( - 0 ()Q ZA Date: -<-l / -4 / 0 tG Reviewed by: ~ Application Fee: $ ~e.., \JIl\VC"D Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 J ~ (...(..JC-'--I ~~ p-v- J, ""^- c> :~~~'~"~~~j~~j ~":;4tf!l':~TL:,Z;:~I;~~}J~,~,~~~~ ~~~~0~~.T ~~r:!~:;/ I~rp.t_~cfib , - \l . - ':2A\rl UD S" - &\J\ Lf 3 L' r;'\/, A A '- 0':' :5Y\ _ E[b4,\ r I {,ly\'r"--V V /Vt \ Revised l/l/~OIlY ~n APR 1 6 2008 Original Submittal t{ ;;L 1 of 3 CITY OF SPRING.....ELD VICINITY MAP ZON2008-00021 Vacant - S 320d & Jasper Road SITE Map 18-02-06-24 Tax Lot 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000 North . Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original SubmIttal tl ,;i! SA1ItE ^ "S,.....Cr A-I l'~ lU, \,.J ~It\ ~) Satre Associates, P.c. 101 East Broadway SUIte 480 Eugene, Oregon 97401 phone 541 465 4721 fax 541 465 4722 1 800 662 7094 www satrepc com April 4, 2008 City of Springfield Development Services Department Plannmg Division 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Attn: Andy Limbird Re: 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Dear Andy, Enclosed please find Development Issues Meeting (DIM) materials for the 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision project. Included are the application, written statement, list of questions, and plans. The Written Statement contains general project information, a summary of the land use request, information about the site and existing conditions, a brief statement regarding the proposed use, and an outline expressing our understanding 9f applicable Springfield Development Code articles. The applicant and project team look forward to the Development Issues Meeting. . As the Applicant's designated contact, Satre Associates is available to provide supplemental infomlation as needed to facilitate the process. Thank you in advance for your consideration of the application. We look forward to working with you on the project. Ric . Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI President Satre Associates, P.C. Date Received: APRI' 1 2008 Original Submittal a 1. Planners, Landscape ArchItects, and EnVIronmental Speczalists DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING 32nd ANi> JASPER ANNEXATION AND SUBDIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter ... ................................... .... .................................... Table of Contents .................. .. ............ ............................. ....... Written Statement ...................................................................... No.ofPaQ:es 1 1 5 Attachments A. List of Questions 2 Exhibits 1. February 11,2008 Correspondence with City Staff ......... ............ 1 2. Forwarded Correspondence from City Staff ................................. 2 3. September 5, 2006 Correspondence from Springfield Utility Board I Plan Sheets L 1. Aerial Photograph ...... . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .... .................... 1 L2. Springfield Data .................................................................. 1 L3. Conceptual Subdivision Plan . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .... ............................ . 1 Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Onginal Submittal () i/- - .... .- SAll(E ASSOCIATES SATRE ASSOCIATES, P .C. Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 101 East Broadway, SUIte 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 465-4721 . Fax (541) 465-4722 . 1-800-662-7094 www satrepc com April 2, 2008 City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision I. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION This Development Issues Meeting request is submitted pursuant to the applicant's desire to apply for annexation of property at 32nd and Jasper Roads under the 2008 Oregon Revised Statutes and under the amended Springfield Development Code. The applicant originally submitted an annexation request for the property on September 28, 2007, Springfield Journal Number LRP2007-00029, under the Statutes and Code in place at that time. Subiect Site The subject site consists of five properties identified as Tax Lots 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900 and 4000 of Lane County Assessor's Map 18-02-06-24. The area so defined will be referred to in this application as the subject site. The site is within the Urban Growth Boundary and contiguous to the Springfield City Limits'. Size Approximately 12.3 acres. Owner/ Aoolicant The property owner and applicant is John L. Mason. Contact information follows. Aoolication Team Applicant: John L. Mason 1920 NW 29th Place Corvallis, Oregon 97330 (541) 602-2447 * jlmcvo@gmai1.com Date Received: APR - ~ 2008 Owners: John L. Mason, Alta M. Mason, and Seldon Mason 1920 NW 29th Place Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Attn: John L. Mason (541) 602-2447 * jlmcvo@gmai1.com Original Submittal a JL , ' Development Issues Meetmg ~ 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIon and SubdIvIsIOn Apnl 2, 2008 - Page 2 Planner/ Landscape Architect/ Environmental Specialist and Applicant's Representative: Satre Associates, P.C. Planners; Landscape Architects and Envirom lental Specialists 101 East Broadway, Suite 480 Eugene, Oregon 97401 Attn: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA (541) 465-4721 * Fax (541) 465-4722 * r.sat'e@satrepc.com Civil Engin'eer/ Traffic Engineer/ Surveyo,': Branch Engineering 310 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Attn: Lane Branch, P .E. (541) 746-0637 * Fax (541) 746-0389 * Lane@BranchEngineering.com II. LAND USE REQUEST This request for a Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is submitted as a pre-requisite to a Type IV Annexation and as an opportunity to clatify issues regarding the contemplated development. r The subject site includes approximately 12.3 acres and consists of Tax Lots 3500, 3600, 3701, I 3900 and 4000, all on Lane County Assessor's Map 18-02-06-24. The applicant submitted an annexation request September 28, 2007 (annexation application catalogued as Springfield Journal No, LRP2007-00029). Staff now advises (February 11, 2008 communication, attached) that it is necess~ to submit a new application and to execute an annexation agreement before the new applidtion. It appears the annexation agreement is the critical path in terms of processing the annexation request in a timely fashion. Therefore, in light ofthe situation, it is to the applicant's best interest for staff to resume drafting the annexation a~reement as soon as possible. Contingent upon approval of the requested annexation, the applicant anticipates developing the subject site as a residential subdivision unddr the cluster subdivision regulations contained in the Springfield Development Code. Questions for City staff are listed in Attachment A. The remainder of this narrative provides basic information regarding the site and the development contemplated for the site. A list of questions is provided herewith. I III. THE SITE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Location The subject site is located south of the inteisection of 32nd Street and Jasper Road and west of Kintzley Avenue. Development Issues Meetmg 32nd & Jasper Annexation and SubdivlSlon Apnl 2, 2008 - lOat",!"""> ~".,,<; ;\ 1;;;><,tDage 31 , " '" ",,~l t' _1.-1 'v ~t..iJ ~ I. .\It r ',,1 ; .;.- J ~,;-,J Lots Affected bv the Pronosed Annexation !1t:_~ The following tax lots (listed in Table 1, below) are included in the annexation request. Table 1. Tax Lots and Area Proposed for Annexation I Map"Number Tax Lot Number I 18-02-06-24 3500 I 3600 I 3701 I 3900 I 4000 I Total Acreage (approximately) Acreage 0.7 acres 3 7 acres o 86 acres 6.03 acres 1 03 acres 12.3 acres Ownershin Ownership of the subject tax lots is as follows: o Lots 3500 and 3600 are owned by Alta M. Mason, John L. Mason, and Seldon T. Mason; · Lots 3701 and 3900 are owned by Sheldon Mason and Alta M. Mason; and . Lot 4000 is owned by John L. Mason. Plan Designation. Zoning and Use The adopted Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) Diagram designates the development area as Low-Density Residential and within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The properties are not within the area of any neighborhood refinement plans. All five properties are zoned LDR Low Density Residential on the Springfield Zoning Map and, because they are within the UGB, the UF-lO Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District applies to all five properties. Per Springfield Development Code Section 3.3.81O(B)(2), the UF-lO Overlay District shall cease to apply after annexation to the city. All five tax lots are vacant. Tax Lots 3600 and 3900 were previously developed with one single- family residence on each lot. Both structures have been demolished. Context The north side of the subject site abuts Jasper Road with approximately 300 feet of street frontage. Jasper Road is classified as a minor arterial on the Springfield Street Classification Map. Jasper Road is the southern city limit at this point and the subject site is therefore contiguous to the City of Springfield. The east side of the subject site has approximately 490 feet of frontage on Kintzley A venue, a local access road that is outside the City limits but inside the urban growth boundary. It is the applicant's understanding that Kintzley Avenue is subject to mtergovernmental agreements between the City of Springfield and Lane County and is therefore considered to be within the jurisdiction of the City of Springfield. Kintzley Avenue is partly developed with single-family detached homes. The south side of the subject site abuts the urban growth boundary. Properties contiguous to the southwestern side of the site are outside the city limits but inside the urban growth boundary and primarily undeveloped. One property contiguous to the northwestern comer of the site is owned by the City, is within the City limits and contains a pond. Development Issues Meetuig 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIon and SubdIvIsIOn Apnl 2, 2008 Page 4 The southwestern comer ofthe subject site includes a portion ofthe Jasper Slough. The Local and National Wetlands Inventory Maps for Springfield show this portion ofthe Slough is on the Local Wetlands Inventory but not on the NatIonal Wetlands Inventory. It is the applicant's I understanding that the site includes areas in the 100-year and 500-year floodplains (FIRM Map 41039Cl161F). In addition, Jasper Slough is shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map as a tributary to a Water Quality Limited Watercourse. Groundwater protection, specifically I Time of Travel Wellhead Protection for the 'Villamette Wellfield, is discussed in the attached List of Questions (Attachment A). Utilities We have obtained existing utility data from tIe City of Springfield. Plan Sheet L2, submitted herewith, documents utility locations. As sho1wn on Sheet L2 and as indicated by city staff and Springfield Utility Board personnel (please refer to Springfield Journal No.'s ZON2006-00045 and LRP2007-00029), the subject site can be served by the orderly extension of key urban servIces. IV. PROPOSED USE The proposed use after the desired annexatio 1 is as a low-density residential subdivision of single-family detached homes using the Cluster Development policies contained in the I Springfield Development Code at SDC 3.2.2BO and the subdivision standards at SDC Section 5.12.100. V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS It is the applicant's understanding that the ap )licable criteria for the contemplated development include the following sections of the Springfield Development Code. Section 5.1-100: Development Approval and Land Use Decision Procedures Section 5.7-100: Annexations Section 3.2.200: Residential Zoning Distficts Section 3.3-200: Drinking Water Protection Overlay District I Section 3.3-400: FP Floodplain Overlay District Section 5.15.100: Minimum Developmedt Standards I Section 5.17.100: Site Plan Review Stamdards Sectrion 4.1-100/4.2-100/4.3-100: Publid and Private Improvements Section 5.12.100: Subdivision Standards Section 5.19.100: Tree Felling Standards Subsequent applications will present findings to address specific relevant criteria of approval contained in each of the listed sections. VI. CONCLUSION Questions for the Development Issues Meeti 19 are included as Attachment A. The applicant requests that representatives from City of Sp 'ingfield planning, public works, engineering, Development Issues Meetmg 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdivisIOn Apnl 2, 2008 Page 5 transportation, envIronmental services, and emergency service divisions, staff from Springfield Utility Board water and electrical departments and staff from Willamalane Park and Recreation District be present for the Development Issues Meeting. We are interested in ensuring that the process proceeds smoothly for everyone involved and hope that the information included in this submittal IS helpful in that regard. We appreciate any feedback staff has at this time that will help streamline the planning and development processes. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Richard M. Satre at Satre Associates, P.C., via telephone at (541) 465-4721. Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Ori3inal Submittal {} rY- ATTACHMENT 1 I1II!IJI - SAll{E ASSOCIATES SATRE ASSOCIATES, P.C. Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 101 East Broadway, SUIte 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 465-4721 . Fax (541) 465-4722 . 1-800-662-7094 www satrepc com April 2, 2008 City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision DIM Ouestions 1. New Rules for the Annexation Process. The applicant applied to annex the subject site in September 2007 (LRP2007 -00029) and City staff held a Development Review Committee meeting (October 23rd, 2007), but the city was not able to process the application forward to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission before the commission stopped receiving applications at the end of 2007. Previously, the Boundary CommIssion coordinated with the city to process Extra-territorial Extensions. Under the new rules for the annexation process, what is the mechanism for extra-territorial extension of urban services in Kintzley Avenue? How else will changes to the process affect this annexation? 2. Timely Processing. Considering the applicant submitted the application to annex the subject site (LRP2007 -00029), along with the required application fees, in good faith more than six months ago, and considering nothing about the applicant's submittal caused or resulted in either the delay or the requirement to repeat the entire process, what consideration can the city provide in order to process the applicant's annexation agreement in a timely fashion? Is it possible to process it before processing other annexation applications received after September 28,20077 3. Annexation Agreement. Many issues affecting the subject site were already discussed among city staff, Springfield Utility Board (SUB) staff, Willamalane Park & Recreation District staff and the applicant and project team. Issues mclude: · Riparian areas and a portion of Jasper Slough in the propeIiy's southwestern comer · Issues regarding urban service extension and Kintzley Avenue · The proximity to the city stormwater system in Jasper Road, the city's interest in conveying stonnwater from areas east of the subject site via the applicant's property to Jasper Slough, and SUB's attention to the proximity of the Willanlette Wellfield. It appears the annexation agreement process will be complex but will provide opportunities for the parties to reach mutually beneficial agreements. What is the normal scope of an annexation agreement, what issues specific to this site must the annexation agreement address, and how can we move the process forward so city staff can draft the annexation agreement in a timely manner geared toward amicable and fair resolution of issues? Date Received: APR ~ 4 2008 a;L Original Submittal City of Sprmgfield DIM Meetmg 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdIvIsIOn - DIM QuestIOns Aun12.2008 I Page 2 4. Potential System Development Charge (SDC) Credits. Considering the open-space potential of the southwestern portion of the plroperty, the city's interest in conveying stormwater from off-site areas via the applicant's prope+y, and the issues regarding off-site improvements, please review these issues and discuss availability of SDC credits to off-set fees involved with the annexation. 5. Permit process after Annexation Agreement. Please discuss the permit process after the annexation agreement has been signed and cbnfirm the suite of permits required to develop the site as a residential subdivision (as discrlssed in the written statement and the attached Conceptual Subdivision Plan, Sheet L3). AI~o, please discuss timing of these submittals under the new annexation process. For example, tnder the new process, can the applicant apply for tentative subdivision during review of the am exation application? Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT 1 Tim Shinabarger From: L1MBIRD Andrew [alimblrd@cl springfield or us] Sent: Monday, February 11,2008 11 31 AM To: Tim Shlnabarger Cc: BENOY Leslie, DONOVAN James Subject: RE LRP20~7 -00029 Tim The City IS operating under a new Annexation Ordinance after the recent changeover of responsibility from the Lane County Boundary Commission Because the City IS now processing annexation requests as land use decIsions, all applicants are required to go through a new Development Issues Meeting (DIM) - even If one was held In the past (In this case on October 5, 2006) It IS standard practice to schedule the DIM on a first-come, first-served basIs upon receipt of a completed application Mr Mason can choose to submit questIons similar to the ones addressed In the 2006 DIM, or perhaps revised questions In light of the new annexation procedure and a change of development Intent (Ie there are no Immediate development plans In the works) At the DIM, staff will explain the updated annexation procedure, including new Annexation Agreement provIsions and application requirements Additionally, fees that would have been paid to the Boundary Commission are now collected by the City so, among other things, a new check will be required for the revised annexation application (when It IS submitted) I would note that the annexation fees have not changed so It will be simply a matter of substituting the Boundary Commission check with a check made out to the City Please let me know If you have any questions Thanks . Andy Llmblrd City of Spnngfleld From: Tim Shlnabarger [mallto:t.shlnabarger@satrepc.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 20089:58 AM To: BENOY Leslie Cc: LIMBIRD Andrew Subject: Spam: LRP2007-00029 Greetings, Les & Andy, I'm wntlng with regards, to John Mason's application to annex his property at 32nd and Jasper Road (Spnngfield Case No LRP2007-00029), which was submitted September 28,2007, to respectfully request you proceed to Initiate a draft Annexation Agreement Your reply regarding the timing for thiS would be most welcome Thank you, , Tim Tim Shlnabarger, MCRP Planner II Satre Associates, P C 101 East Broadway, SUite 480 Eugene, Oregon 97401 Phone 5414654721 Fax 541 4654722 t shlnabarger@satrepc com Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original Submittal a 1- 4/4/2008 EXHIBIT 2 Richard Satre From: Sent: To: Subject: Rob Dehnert Monday, March 24,2008500 PM Richard Satre, Tim Shmabarger FW John Mason Annexation Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Purple FYI Robin G. Dehnert, AICP Plannlng Manager SATRE ASSOCIATES, P. C. 541.465.4721 Fax 541.465.4721 -----Orlginal Message----- From: John Lively Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:45 PM To: Rob Dehnert Subject: FW: John Mason Annexation \ Rob, Here is the lnformatlon I got back on the John Mason annexation request when I asked. John -----Original Message----- From: GRILE Blll [mallto:bgrile@cl.springfield.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:16 PM To' John Lively Subject: FW: John Mason Annexatlon -----Orlginal Message----- From: DONOVAN James Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:19 AM To: GRILE Blll SubJect. RE: John Mason Annexation Date Received: APR - 4 2008 .tt , arf- Original subml a Bill, After two renditions, changes of ownershlp, appllcant delays and bringlng Satre in, the Mason annexatlon team dld not flnlsh an annexatlon agreement wlth PW before the Dec 31st LCBC deadline and subsequently turned into a pumpkln. Seriously, they fell lnto the never never land of starting under the bc ordlnance and having to flnlsh under our new ordlnance consistent with ORS 222 (process stlll under constructlon). The new DIM lS free for those half dozen applicants caught in the never never land and is designed to advise them of the new process, provlde new forms, ask for a new check cut to the city (instead of the BC, no new fees or increases, just new reclplent) and Jumpstart their AA because it is now a condition of re-submittal. When we have the AA and revised paperwork we will deem It complete under the new ordinance and start a 120 and move this to DRC and CC agenda. No apologies necessary here, just responding to a new statute and ordinance. JD 1 . ' ~----Original Message----- From: GRILE Bill Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:07 AM To: DONOVAN James SubJect: FW: John Mason Annexation Jlm: , Please give me an update but don't respond to John. Thanks. ... .Bill ~ , 2 Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original Suomilrai 12rf:- ~.. ~ ~..... ~U-n-'\\rl-rE-~ ~ -.--...-- EXHIBIT 3 ,-.l\' SEP I LU06 L!:I I ~A16RE ~SSOerArESuJi com SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD II ITER 'Eln Ic..E CI:'-THi 202 South 18th Street Springfield, OR 97477-5240 IS\ 541 September 5, 2006 Mr Andy Llmbrrd CIty of Sprmgfield 225 - 5th Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 Dear Andy: SUBJECT: ZON#2006-00045 (18-02-06-24 TL 3500,3600,3701,3900,4000) DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 21,2006 DRlNKING WATER PROTECTION AREA CONCERNS 32nd & Jasper Road We would hke to submIt the followmg comments for consIderatIOn as development IS planned for these properhes Satre and AsSOCIates have noted that the land surface area m the project site IS WIthin the two-year and five-year tune-of-travel zones for the W1l1amette Wellfie1d Smce StOID1 water from tms SIte WIll go mto the Jasper Slough, It IS critical to understand that water entenng the slough and Spnngfield MIll Race IS dIverted through the Gory Creek Headgates mto the WIllamette Wellfield TIus water becomes a drrect recharge to the aqUIfer used for the pubhc dnnkmg water supply. Once water from the slough enters the Spnngfield MIll Race, the tIme-of-travel to the wellfield can be a matter of mmutes rather than years, as the tIme-of-travel zones would mdIcate Storm water management for the project SIte IS cnhcal for dnnkmg water protectIOn and Spnngfield UtIlIty Board staff WIll work closely WIth the CIty of Spnngfield and the developer to protect both surface water and groundwater recharge qualIty. Smcerely, Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original submittaL-L/ :I- Charles S. DaVIS Water Quahty Program Manager. ~ CSD.mkm cc: WIllamette Development Semces, 110 - 3rd Street SE, Albany, OR 97321 John Mason, 1920 NW 29th Place, CorvallIS, OR 97330 Satre ASSOCIates PC" 132 East Broadway, SUIte 536, Eugene, OR 97401 Lane Branch PE, Branch Engmeermg, 310 FIfth Street, Spnngfield, OR 97477 \\svr-data\wscengnr\SITEPLAN\32nd & Jasper SubdIVISIon DWP doc