HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Meeting PWE 5/15/2008
~
0;
MEMORANDUM
City of Sorindield
DATE: May 15,2008
TO: Andy Limbird, Urban Planner II
FROM: Matt Stouder, Supervising Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ZON2008-00021, Mason Annexation
Public Works Engineering Comments
The subject application involves tax lots 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900 & 4000, located at SW 32nd St
and Jasper Road. The applicant has submitted plans to discuss annexing 12.3 acres into the City
of Springfield for future development of an 80-lot SFR subdivision.
Applicant's Questions:
1. New rules for the annexation process? Planning to respond.
2. Timely Processing?
3. Annexation Agreement? - It appears the annexation agreement process will be
complex but will provide opportunities for the parties to reach mutually beneficial
agreements. What is the normal scope of an annexation agreement, what issues
specific to this site must the annexation agreement address, and how can we move
the process forward so City staff can draft the annexation agreement in a timely
manner geared toward amicable and fair resolution of the issues?
Reference the boiler plate annexation agreement attached for the normal scope of an
annexation agreement (AA). Issues specific to this site that will be included in the AA
(and have been discussed in previous meetings held at the City) include provisions for
stormwater service, sanitary sewer service, and transportation systems (including
Kintzley Ave.).
Once the applicant makes a formal request to initiate an AA (this meeting can serve as
the formal request), City staffwill move to prepare a draft AA. Recognizing this process
is'somewhat new (with dissolution of the Boundary Commission), staff will create an AA
team to id~ntify issues and draft the agreement after this meeting (see attached
flowchart).
4. Potential SDC Credits - Considering the open space potential of the southwestern
portion ofthe property, the City's interest in conveying stormwater from off-site
areas via the applicant's property, and the issues regarding off-site improvements,
please review these issues and discuss availability of SDC credits to off-set fees
involved with the annexation.
Page 1 of2 Date Received: .r /'r /~I
C \Documents and Settmgs\hmb0967\Local Settmgs\Temporary Internet Flles\OLK9C\ZON2008-00021 Mason DOCP'anner: Al I /
,
This question is be}vild the scope of the 1 hour DIM meetir...___ The potential SDC credits
would be negotiated at the time of annexation agreement between the City and applicant.
The City has expressed interest in conveying off-site stormwater through the applicant's
property, and at this time, an evaluation of the area that can be served (off-site) has not
been performed or reviewed by either the applicant or the City. The City is interested in
how much property east of the subject site can be served through this development. The
amount of credit available will likely be associated with the amount of land that can be
served. After this evaluation has occurred, the City Engineer or staff will review and
check budgetary constraints to see what funds may be available as part of an annexation
negotiation.
5. Permit process after Annexation Agreement?
'.
Page 2 of2 'J S;/;S;/)oOr
C \Documents and Settmgs\hmb0967\Local Settmgs\Temporary Internet FlIes\OLK9C\ZON2008-00021 Mason ocQate ReceIved:
Planner: AL