HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/4/2008 (3)
City of Springfield Date Received:
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477 APR - 4 2008
Development Issues Meeting (DIMi}inal Submittal /l"b
SPRINGFIELD
~-
Prospective
Applicant Name: John L. Mason
Company:
Phone: (541) 602-2447
Fax:
Address:
1920 NW 29th Place, Corvallis, OreCjon 97330
Prospective
Applicant's Rep.: Richard M. Satre, A1CP, ASLA, CS1
Company:
Address:
Satre Associates, P.c.
Phone: (541) 465-4721
Fax: (541) 465-4722
101 East Broadway, SUite 480, Eugene, OreCjon 97401
. -
Property Owner: Alta Mason, Seldon Mason and John L. Mason Phone: (541) 602-2447
Company: Fax:
Address:
I
1920 NW 29th Place, Corvallis, OreCjon 97330
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-06-24
,
TAX LOT NO(S): 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000
Property Address: 3202 Jasper Road
Size of Property:
I
Approximately 12.3 acres
Acres ~ Square Feet 0
Description of
Proposal:
Existing Use:
If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal descnptlon to this application
Annexation for Low-Density Residential development
Vacant
# of Lots/Parcels: 5
I
Prospective
Applicant:
Avg. I,.tot/Parcel Size: 107,158 sf Density: 0
/
dujacre
Date: 3 - a 6 - l? ~
ature-
:=S-6hN 1_ YV1 A <;d'N
Print
Case No.: jtm 7"')1 iii - ()()02A Date: <l / /.j (0 <G Reviewed by: ~
Application Fee: $ Fee., \JI4\\It;'"D .Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0
0') _ ~ LUC:~\'y-e,,\ ;2v J,'h" V
TOTAL FEES: $ ,~ ~;~~;,~~:~.1_ ';FVl'rA.,~ROJEC!.NUM~~~: ,f{ ?ct~b'-,p~,)<A
8J~~~-~a~4\ ~ fc't\r-A< bUA '\
ReVised l/l/~OIlY ~kanan -) 1 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements~Checklist
o Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
[g] Deve'lopment Issues Meeting Application Form
[g] Five (S) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
[g] Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It IS not necessary to Include all of these Items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be denved from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided In the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed In
the Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
[g] Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
[g] Scale appropriate to the area Involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
[g] North arrow
[g] Date of preparation
[g] Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
[g] DimenSions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
o Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities, Including connection pOints
o On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
o Area and dimenSions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
[g] ApprOXimate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
[g] How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
o
Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimenSions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between bUildings, and height
Area and percentage of the site proposed for bUildings, structures, driveways,
Sidewalks, patios and other Impervious surfaces
Parking and circulation plan
Date Received:
o
o
ReVised 1/1/08 Nolly Markarian
APR - 4 2008
Original SUbmittaLU
< ')f 3
LAFLEUR Karen
Subject:
Location:
ZON2008-00021 Development Issues Mtg/ Mason - Andy L
_SP _ConfRm616
Thu 5/15/2008 2.30 PM
Thu 5/15/2008 3'30 PM
Start:
End:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Meeting organizer
Resources:
LAFLEUR Karen, L1MBIRD Andrew; MCKENNEY Gary; GORDON Gilbert, MCKEE Bart
(SUB), ERNST Dennis, WALKER George; BAJRACHARYA Shashl, GOTTFRIED Charles,
Engineering Group (DIMs); Johnson Tamara (TamaraJ@subutll.com), Pat French
(patf@wlllamalane org)
_SP _ConfRm616
Required Attendees:
A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, May 15, 2008 @ 2.30 - 330 P m. in DSD 616 The
planner assigned to this application IS Andy Limblrd The applicant submitted plans to discuss annexing 123 acres rnto
the City of Springfield for future 80-lot SFR subdiVIsion This will be the third DIM to be held on this development REF
ZON2005-00014; ZON2006-00045 Please confirm your attendance at thiS meeting Thanks . Karen
NOTE: Due to the large number of Development Issue Meetings submitted within the last
several weeks, it will now be necessary to begin having two meetings per Thursday until we
can schedule out within a reasonable time frame. Thanks in advance for your patience.
Karen
Date Received:
APR ... + 2008
Original SUbmitta'~
1
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
ZON2008-00021
Vacant - S 32nd & Jasper Road
SITE
Map 18-02-06-24
Tax Lot 3500,
3600, 3701, 3900,
4000
North
..
Date Received:
APR - 4 2008
Original Submittal aY
ATTACHMENT 1
IIIJ!IJI
-
SAtRE
ASSOCIATES
SATRE ASSOCIATES, P .C.
Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists
101 East Broadway, Smte 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401
(541) 465-4721 . Fax (541) 465-4722 . 1-800-662-7094
www satrepc com
April 2, 2008
Date Received:
City of Springfield
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision
APR - 4 2008
O'-If"ln"" '" ""'"1' . ' cAX-
'" ;}.4' "Ai ,:......., tot',r.. ___^_<"_'
DIM Questions
1. New Rules for the Annexation Process. The applicant applied to annex the subject site in
September 2007 (LRP2007-00029) and City staff held a Development Review Committee
meeting (October 23rd, 2007), but the city was not able to process the application forward to the
Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission before the commission stopped
receiving applications at the end of 2007. Previously, the Boundary Commission coordinated
with the city to process Extra-territorial Extensions. Under the new rules for the annexation
process, what is the mechanism for extra-territorial extension of urban services in Kintzley
Avenue? How else will changes to the process affect this annexation?
2. Timely Processing. Considering the applicant submitted the application to annex the subject
site (LRP2007 -00029), along with the required application fees, in good faith more than six
months ago, and considering nothing about the applicant's submittal caused or resulted in either
the delay or the requirement to repeat the entire process, what consideration can the city provide
in order to process the applicant's annexation agreement in a timely fashIon? Is it possible to
process it before processing other annexation applications received after September 28, 20077
3. Annexation Agreement. Many issues affecting the subject site were already discussed among
city staff, Springfield Utility Board (SUB) staff, Willamalane Park & Recreation District staff
and the applicant and project team. Issues include:
· Riparian areas and a portion of Jasper Slough in the property's southwestern corner
. Issues regarding urban service extension and Kintzley Avenue
e The proximity to the city stoimwater system in Jasper Road, the city's interest in
conveying stormwater from areas east of the subject site via the applicant's property to
Jasper Slough, and SUB's attention to the proximity of the Willanlette Wellfield.
It appears the annexation agreement process will be complex but will provide opportunities for
the partIes to reach mutually beneficial agreements. What is the nonnal scope of an annexation
agreement, what issues specific to this site must the annexation agreement address, and how can
we move the process forward so city staff can draft the annexation agreement in a tinlely manner
geared toward amicable and fair resolution of issues?
City of Sprmgfield DIM Meetmg
32nd & Jasper AnnexatiOn and SubdlvlSlon - DIM QuestiOns
Annl 2. 2008 I
Page 2
4. Potential System Development Charge (SDC) Credits. Considering the open-space
potential of the southwestern portion of the ptoperty, the city's interest in conveying stormwater
from off-SIte areas via the applicant's properly, and the Issues regarding off-site improvements,
I
please review these issues and discuss availability of SDC credits to off-set fees involved with
the annexation.
5. Permit pro~ess after Annexation Agreement. Please discuss the permit process after the
annexation agreement has been signed and cimfirm the suite of permits required to develop the
site as a residential subdivision (as discu1ssed in the written statement and the attached
Conceptual Subdivision Plan, Sheet L3). AI~o, please discuss timing of these submittals under
the new annexation process. For example, uhder the new process, can the applicant apply for
tentative subdivision during review of the ~exation application?
Date Received:
APR - 4 2008
Onginal Submittal \) #-
SMItE
ASSOCIATES
Satre Associates, P C.
101 East Broadway
SUite 480
Eugene, Oregon 97401
phone 541 4654721
fax 5414654722
1 800 662 7094
www satrepc com
April 4, 2008
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
Planning Division
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
Date Received:
APR ' - 4 2008
Original SUbmittalff
Attn: Andy Limbird
Re: 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
Dear Andy,
Enclosed please find Development Issues Meeting (DIM) materials for the 32nd &
Jasper Annexation and Subdivision project. Included are the application, written
statement, list of questions, and plans.
The Written Statement contains general project information, a summary of the land
use request, information about the site and existing conditions, a brief statement
regarding the proposed use, and ~m outline expressing our understanding of
applicable Springfield Development Code articles.
The applicant and project team look forward to the Development Issues Meeting.
As the Applicant's designated contact, Satre Associates is available to provide
supplemental information as needed to facilitate the process.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of the application. We look forward
to working with you on the project.
Ric . Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI
President
Satre Associates, P.C.
Planners, Landscape Arch;ltects, and Envlronmental Specialists
,
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING
32nd AND JASPER ANNEXATION AND SUBDIVISION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter ...................................... .... ................................. ...
Table of Contents ........................................................................
Written Statement ............................. .................................... .....
No.ofPal!es
1
1
5
Attachments
A. List of Questions
2
Exhibits
1. February 11, 2008 Correspondence with City Staff .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . 1
2. Forwarded Correspondence from City Staff ................................. 2
3. September 5, 2006 Correspondence from Springfield Utility Board 1
Plan Sheets
Ll. Aerial Photograph ............................................................ ... 1
L2. Springfield Data .................................................................. 1
L3. Conceptual Subdivision Plan .................................................. 1
Date Received:
APR - 4 2008
Original Submittal ar/---
-
~
..
SN"KE
ASSOCIATES
SATRE ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists
101 East Broadway, Suite 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401
(541)465-4721. Fax(541)465-4722 .1-800-662-7094
www satrepc com
April 2, 2008
Date Received:
APR - 4 2008
Original SUbmittal dX
- 1 _
City of Springfield
Development Issues Meeting
32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision
I. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
This Development Issues Meeting request is submitted pursuant to the applicant's desire to apply
for annexation of property at 32nd and Jasper Roads under the 2008 Oregon Revised Statutes
and under the amended Springfield Development Code. The applicant originally submitted an
annexation request for the property on September 28, 2007, Springfield Journal Number
LRP2007-00029, under the Statutes and Code in place at that time.
Subiect Site
The subject site consists of five properties identified as Tax Lots 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900 and
4000 of Lane County Assessor's Map 18-02-06-24. The area so defined will be referred to in this
application as the subject site. The site is within the Urban Growth Boundary and contiguous to
the Springfield City Limits.
Size
Approximately 12.3 acres.
Owner/ Aoolicant
The property owner and applicant is John L. Mason. Contact information follows.
Aoolication Team
Applicant:
John L. Mason
1920 NW 29th Place
Corvalhs, Oregon 97330
(541) 602-2447 * jlmcvo@gmail.com
Owners:
John L. Mason, Aha M. Mason, and Seldon Mason
1920 NW 29th Place
Corvallis, Oregon 97330
Attn: John L. Mason
(541) 602-2447 * jlmcvo@gmail.com
Development Issues Meetmg
32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdIviSIOn
Apnl 2, 2008
Page 2
Planner/ Landscape Architect/ Environmental Specialist and Applicant's Representative:
Satre Associates, P.C.
Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists
101 East Broadway, Suite 480
Eugene, Oregon 97401
Attn: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA
(541) 465-4721 * Fax (541) 465-4722 * r.satre@satrepc.co111[)ate Received:
Civil Engineer/ Traffic Engineer/ Surveyor:
Branch Engineering I
310 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
Attn: Lane Branch, P .E.
(541) 746-0637 * Fax (541) 746-0389 * Lane@BranchEngineering.com
APR - 4 2008
OriginatSubmittal~
II. LAND USE REQUEST
This request for a Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is submitted as a pre-requisite to a Type
IV Annexation and as an opportunity to cla~ify issues regarding the contemplated development.
The subject site includes approximately 12.3 acres and consists of Tax Lots 3500, 3600, 3701,
I
3900 and 4000, all on Lane County Assessor's Map 18-02-06-24.
The applicant submitted an annexation re<!luest September 28, 2007 (annexation application
catalogued as Springfield Journal No. LRP2007-00029). Staff now advises (February 11, 2008
communication, attached) that it is necess~ to submit a new application and to execute an
annexation agreement before the new applidtion.
It appears the annexation agreement is the critical path in terms of processing the annexation
request in a timely fashion. Therefore, in light of the situation, it is to the applicant's best interest
for staff to resume drafting the annexation agreement as soon as possible.
Contingent upon approval of the requested annexation, the applicant anticipates developing the
subject site as a residential subdivision unde~ the cluster subdivision regulations contained in the
Springfield Development Code.
Questions for City staff are listed in Attachment A.
The remainder of this narrative provides basic information regarding the site and the
development contemplated for the site. A list of questions is provided herewith.
III. THE SITE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
Location
The subject site is located south of the inte'section of 32nd Street and Jasper Road and west of
Kintzley Avenue.
i'
Development Issues Meetnig
32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdivisIOn
Apnl 2, 2008
Date Received:
Page 3
Lots Affected bv the Pronosed Annexation
The following tax lots (listed in Table 1, below) are mcluded in the annexation request.
APR - 4 2008
Original Subm;ttal. d)!2
Table 1. Tax Lots and Area Proposed for Annexation
I Map Number
I 18-02-06-24
I
I
I
Tax Lot Number
3500
3600
3701
3900
4000
Acreage
0.7 acres
3 7 acres
o 86 acres
6 03 acres
1 03 acres
12.3 acres
Total Acreage (approximately)
Ownershin
Ownership ofthe subject tax lots is as follows:
. Lots 3500 and 3600 are owned by Aha M. Mason, John L. Mason, and Seldon T.
Mason;
. Lots 3701 and 3900 are owned by Sheldon Mason and Alta M. Mason; and
. Lot 4000 is owned by John L. Mason.
Plan Designation. Zoning and Use
The adopted Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) Diagram
designates the development area as Low-Density Residential and within the Urban Growth
Boundary (UGB). The properties are not within the area of any neighborhood refinement plans.
All five properties are zoned LDR Low Density Residential on the Springfield Zoning Map and,
because they are within the UGB, the UF-lO Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District applies to all
five properties. Per Springfield Development Code Section 3.3.810(B)(2), the UF-IO Overlay
District shall cease to apply after annexation to the city.
All five tax lots are vacant. Tax Lots 3600 and 3900 were previously developed with one single-
family residence on each lot. Both structures have been demolished.
Context
The north side of the subject site abuts Jasper Road with approximately 300 feet of street
frontage. Jasper Road is classified as a minor arterial on the Springfield Street Classification
Map. Jasper Road is the southern city limit at this point and the subject site is therefore
contiguous to the City of Springfield. The east side of the subject site has approximately 490 feet
of frontage on Kintzley Avenue, a local access road that is outside the City limits but inside the
urban growth boundary. It is the applicant's understanding that Kintzley Avenue is subject to
intergovernmental agreements between the City of Springfield and Lane County and is therefore
considered to be within the jurisdiction of the City of Springfield. Kintzley Avenue is partly
developed with single-family detached homes. The south side of the subject site abuts the urban
growth boundary. Properties contiguous to the southwestern side of the site are outside the city
limits but inside the urban growth boundary and primarIly undeveloped One property
contiguous to the northwestern comer of the site is owned by the CIty, is withm the City limits
and contains a pond.
" ,
Date Received:
Page 4
Development Issues Meetmg
32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdivIsIOn
Apnl 2; 2008
AAR - It---2OO8
<Dnginal Submittal W
The southwestern comer of the subject site iJcludes a portion of the Jasper Slough. The Local
and National Wetlands Inventory Maps for S~ringfield show this portion of the Slough is on the
Local Wetlands Inventory but not on the Nat~onal Wetlands Inventory. It is the applicant's
understanding that the site includes areas in the 100-year and 500-year floodplains (FIRM Map
41039Cl161F). In addition, Jasper Slough is shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map as a tributary to a Water Quality Limited Watercourse. Groundwater protection, specifically
I ,
Time of Travel Wellhead Protection for the \Villamette Wellfield, is discussed in the attached
List of Questions (Attachment A).
Utilities
We have obtained existing utility data from the City of Springfield. Plan Sheet L2, submitted
herewith, documents utility locations. As shdwn on Sheet L2 and as indicated by city staff and
Springfield Utility Board personnel (please r6fer to Springfield Journal No.'s ZON2006-00045
and LRP2007-00029), the subject site can be served by the orderly extension of key urban
servIces.
IV. PROPOSED USE
The proposed use after the desired annexation is as a low-density residential subdivision of
single-family detached homes using the Cluster Development policies contained in the
I
Springfield Development Code at SDC 3.2.260 and the subdivision standards at SDC Section
5.12.100.
V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
It is the applicant's understanding that the ap~licable criteria for the contemplated development
include the following sections of the Springfield Development Code.
Section 5.1-100: Development Approval and Land Use Decision Procedures
Section 5.7-100: Annexations
Section 3.Z.200: Residential Zoning Dist icts
Section 3.3-200: Drinking Water Protection Overlay District
I
Section 3.3-400: FP Floodplain Overlay District
Section 5.15.100: Minimum DevelopmeJt Standards
I
Section 5.17.100: Site Plan Review Standards
Sectrion 4.1-100/4.2-100/4.3-100: Publid and Private Improvements
Section 5.12.100: Subdivision Standards
Section 5.19.100: Tree Felling Standards
Subsequent applications will present finding; to address specific relevant criteria of approval
contained in each of the listed sections.
VI. CONCLUSION
Questions for the Development Issues Meeti Ig are included as Attachment A. The applicant
requests that representatives from City of Sp 'ingfield planning, public works, engineering,
Development Issues Meetmg
32nd & Jasper AnnexatIon and SubdivIsIOn
Apnl 2, 2008
Page 5
transportation, environmental services, and emergency service divisions, staff from Springfield
Utility Board water and electrical departments and staff from Willamalane Park and Recreation
District be present for the Development Issues Meeting. Weare interested in ensuring that the
process proceeds smoothly for everyone involved and hope that the information included in this
submittal is helpful in that regard. We appreciate any feedback staff has at this time that will
help streamline the planning and development processes.
Thank you in advance for your assistance. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact Richard M. Satre at Satre Associates, P.C., via telephone at (541) 465-4721.
Date Received:
APR - 4 2008
Original Submittal If~
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 1
Tim Shinabarger
--8ate-'R-eeeivea:
From: L1MBIRD Andrew [allmblrd@cl spnngfield or us]
Sent: Monday, February 11,2008 11 31 AM
To: Tim Shlnabarger
Cc: BENOY Leslie, DONOVAN James
Subject: RE LRP2007-00029
APR - 4 2008
Original Submittal d rr:-
Tim The City IS operating under a new Annexation Ordinance after the recent changeover of responsibility from
the Lane County Boundary Commission Because the City is now processing annexation requests as land use
decIsions, all applicants are required to go through a new Development Issues Meeting (DIM) - even If one was
held In the past (In thIs case on October 5, '2006) It IS standard practice to schedule the DIM on a first-come,
first-served basIs upon receipt of a completed application Mr Mason can choose to submit questions similar to
the ones addressed In the 2006 DIM, or perhaps reVised questions In light of the new annexation procedure and a
change of development Intent (Ie there are no Immediate development plans In the works) At the DIM, staff will
explain the updated annexation procedure, including new Annexation Agreement provIsions and application
requirements Additionally, fees that would have been paid to the Boundary Commission are now collected by the
City so, among other things, a new check will be required for the reVised annexation application (when It IS
submitted) I would note that the annexation fees have not changed so It will be simply a matter of substituting
the Boundary Commission check With a check made out to the City Please let me know If you have any
questions Thanks
Andy Llmblrd
City of Spnngfleld
From: Tim Shinabarger [mallto:t.shmabarger@satrepc.com]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 9:58 AM
To: BENOY Leslie
Cc: UMBIRD Andrew
Subject: Spam: LRP2007-00029
Greetings, Les & Andy,
I'm wntlng With regards to John Mason's application to annex his property at 32nd and Jasper Road (Spnngfield
Case No LRP2007-00029), which was submitted September 28,2007, to respectfully request you proceed to
Initiate a draft Annexation Agreement
Your reply regarding the timing for this would be most welcome
Thank you,
Tim
Tim Shlnabarger, MCRP
Planner II
Satre Associates, P C
101 East Broadway, SUite 480
Eugene, Oregon 97401
Phone 541 4654721
Fax 541 4654722
t shlnabarger@satrepc com
4/4/2008
EXHIBIT 2
Richard Satre
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rob Dehnert
Monday, March 24, 2008 5 00 PM
Richard Satre, Tim Shlnabarger
FW John Mason Annexation
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Purple
FYI
Date Received:
SATRE ASSOCIATES, P. C.
541.465.4721 Fax 541.465.4721
APR - 4 2008
Original Submittal ~
Rob~n G. Dehnert, AICP
Plann~ng Manager
-----Or~ginal Message-----
From: John Lively
Sent~ Monday, March 24, 2008 3:45 PM
To: Rob Dehnert
SubJect. FW: John Mason Annexat~on
Rob,
Here is the information I got back on the John Mason annexat~on request when I asked.
John
-----Or~g~nal Message-----
From: GRILE Bill [ma~lto:bgr~le@ci.spr~ngf~eld.or.us]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:16 PM
To: John L~vely
SubJect FW: John Mason Annexation
-----Or~g~nal Message-----
From: DONOVAN James
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:19 AM
To: GRILE B~ll
SubJect: RE: John Mason Annexation
Bill,
After two rend~t~ons, changes of ownership, applicant delays and bringing Satre ~n, the
Mason annexation team did not f~n~sh an annexat~on agreement with PW before the Dec. 31st
LCBC deadl~ne and subsequently turned ~nto a pumpk~n. Ser~ously, they fell ~nto the never
never land of starting under the bc ord~nance and having to fin~sh under our new ordinance
consistent with ORS 222 (process still under construct~on). The new DIM ~s free for those
half dozen applicants caught ~n the never never land and ~s des~gned to advise them of the
new process, provide new forms, ask for a new check cut to the city (instead of the BC, no
new fees or increases, just new rec~pient) and Jumpstart the~r AA because it is now a
condition of re-subm~ttal. When we have the AA and rev~sed paperwork we will deem ~t
complete under the new ordinance and start a 120 and move this to DRC and CC agenda.
No apologies necessary here, just respond~ng to a new statute and ord~nance.
JD
1
-----Orlglnal Message-----
From: GRILE Blll
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:07 AM
To: DONOVAN James
SubJect: FW: John Mason Annexation
Jlm:
Please glve me an update but don't respond to John. Thanks.
... .Bill
2
Date Received:
, r'",
APR - 4 2008
. "" I, /}~
~ ',~ ~~1 ~ VI;
.>... _~.. r, '.._ _~_ __~__..~_
~/
g)[E_~~_~T~::I;;~
. I SEP I LUU6 I!::1JI
'"' 541t'SAl'R1:! ),\SSDCIAl'f!S" '., 'o~
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
\\ ,ITER <;[1"'1::'" C~~,TER 202 South 18th,Street Springfield, OR 97477,5240
September 5, 2006
Date Received:
Mr Andy Llmbrrd
CIty of Spnngfield
225 - 5th Street
Spnngfield, OR 97477
APR - 4 2008
Original SubmIttal a;z::
Dear Andy:
SUBJECT:
ZON#2006-00045 (18-02-06-24 TL 3500,3600,3701,3900,4000)
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEJ'vlBER 21,2006
DRINKING WATER PROTECTION AREA CONCERNS
32nd & Jasper Road
We would hke to subrmt the followmg comments for consIderatIOn as development IS planned for these
properhes
Satre and AssocIates have noted that the land surface area m the project SIte IS Wlthin the two-year and
five-year tnne-of-travel zones for the Wlllamette Wellfield Smce StOIDl water from tills SIte WIll go mto
the Jasper Slough, It IS cntlcal to understand that water entenng the slough and Spnngfield MIll Race IS
dIverted through the Gory Creek Headgates mto the Wlllamette Wellfield ThIs water becomes a drrect
recharge to the aqUIfer used for the pubhc dnnkmg water supply. Once water :Ii-om the slough enters the
Spnngfield MIll Race, the tIme-of-travel to the wellfield can be a matter of nunutes rather than years, as
the tIme-of-travel zones would mdIcate
Storm water management for the project SIte IS cntical for dnnkmg water protectIOn and Spnngfield
UtIhty Board staffWlll work closely Wlth the CIty of Spnngfield and the developer to protect both surface
water and groundwater recharge qualIty
Smcerely,
Charles S DaVIS
Water Quahty Program Manager
:
CSD mkm
cc. WIllamette Development Semces, 110 - 3rd Street SE, Albany, OR 97321
John Mason, 1920 NW 29th Place, Corvalhs, OR 97330
Satre AssocIates PC" 132 East Broadway, SUIte 536, Eugene, OR 97401
Lane Branch PE, Branch Engmeermg, 310 FIfth Street, Spnngfield, OR 97477
\\svr-data\wscengnr\SITEPLAN\32nd & Jasper SubdlV1S1on DWP doc
541-726-3753 Phone
541-726-3676 Fax
DescriptIon
UGB Development Issues Mtg
Fees Associated .-T;.th
Case #: ZON2008-~ ~J21
3229 JASPER RD
MASON SHELDON & ALTA M
Trans
Code
Revenue
Account Number
Date Calculated Original
Calculated By Amount
4/4/2008 T AI 0.00
Total Due:
1214
100-00000-425002
d.AL W~ ~ ~ b~Cl-M-J
~ -6. oj 1-lw~ ~ ~ DYL-
s.\Tidemark\forms\casefeesl rpt
Date Received:
APR - 4 2008
Original SUbmlttaLgtl~'
Page 1 of 1
4/16/2008
718:37AM
Amount
Due
000
$0.00