HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance Miscellaneous 3/17/2008
.^\
Date Reooived:. 1 f1.d3
Planner: BJ
ORDINANCE NO. 6220 (Special)
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS
EVANS/Be I LlOAK DALE AVENUE LOCATED IN THE GATEWAY AREA OF NORTWEST
SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF GAME FARM ROAD AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY
EVANSlBe I L AND THAT PORTION OF OAKDALE AVENUE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
BETWEEN GAME FARM ROAD AND PHEASANT BOULEVARD. THE WITHDRA~AL
INVOVLVES APPROXIMATELY 0.69 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 2500,2600 AND
2700, T17S R03W S22 MAP 42 AND 0.45 ACRES OF OAKDALE AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY
(1.14 ACRES TOTAL); HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE
RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield
by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
Number File EC SP 07-64, effective 12/26/07, as recommended in CIty Planning File No.
LRP2007-00018 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07- 48 (and further described in
Exhibit A & B), and
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow
Water District, and
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption
on March 17,2008. in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no
objections raised.
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County. Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein.
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 22. Map 42, Tax Lots 2500,
2600 and 2700, and Oakdale Avenue public right of way between Game Farm Road and
Pheasant Boulevard; as more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary
Commission File Number EC SP 07- 64.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008,
by a vote of <; for and n against.
~.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the ~ngfield t~s~ay of March 2008.
~~V I/' -
. "--J -M~or Y
~~
City Re~der
ATTEST:
~~..-\ _ _~ \....~ ,,,,-:-1
'2... 1 :;).~_ ll:>tf
EXHIBIT A - P1
LA.I:1..USu A
Date Received:~. (1 () Y
n___.__~
Planner: BJ
PRO!' J:.KTY DESCRIPTION
LOts 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 of Farmdale Subdivision, recorded in Book 27, Page 28, Lane County Oregon
Plat records in Lane CO?I1ty, Oregon.
RIGID' OF WAY DESCRl.t' BON
Situated in the City of Springfield., Lane County, Oregon, in the northwest quarter of southeast quarter of
Section 22, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian as described as follows:
A portion of the Oakdale Avenue shown on the Farmdale subdivision plat, recorded in Book 27, Page 28
of the Lane County Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon, more particularly descnbed as follows:
Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Farmdale plat; thence westerly along the
southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue as descnbed in said plat 255 feet more or less to the most
westerly northwest c()mer of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Farmdale plat, said comer also being the intersection
of the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue and the eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard;
thence northerly along said ea,L...... right of way of Pheasant Boulevard, said right of way also being the
western outer boundary of said plat, 100 feet more or less to the most westerly southwest comer of Lot
17, Block 2 of said plat; thence along the northern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 355 feet more or
less to the most easterly southeast comer of Lot 14, Block 2 of said plat; thence crossing said Oakdale
Avenue along the right of way of Game Farm Road to the most easterly northeast comer ofLat 1, Block 1
of said plat; thence westerly along the southern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 93 feet more or less
to the point of beginning.
R . d J;11,ai
Date ecslve. ..._~________a
I
Plannen BJ
/1
\.
/
~
/'
\.
ANNEXA nON AREA
- Includes TLs 2500, 2600, 2700, 17-0:>-22-42; ~
Owned by Michael Evans and Geraldine Betz;
and including a portion of Oakdale A venue
(Be SP 07 - 64)
I
'"
1
EXHIBIT A - P2
MAP No.2 ;:)ll.t; MAP
Annexation to Springfield
(EvanslBetzlOakdaIe Avenue)
ECSP07-64
~
-c
rr:
~
III
La.
CD
E
III
C) -
I!lLI Area to be annexed
I I Tax Lots
EvanslBetz
dty Bmits
III
~ ____ .. . . . dI.........
o.n_.... .., Jr...,_.........,.
. 1-..-, ,.... .. If.. ., .,_,.-
LCLGBC Staff Analysis CEcsP.cn-64)-December 14, 2001
Page 9 of9
EXHIBIT B - \ P1
Oregon
" ~'LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
Date Received: ? (1ug,t~ ~~:g ::~~~;
Planner: BJ .
December 14,2007
TO: Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County
Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of
Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Rainbow Water and Fire
District; Michael Evans; and Geraldine Betz
FROM: Paula L Taylor, Ex~tive Offi~ of. ~'.lj('
SUBJECT: EC SP 07 - 64 (Expedited Procedure)
ANNEXA nON OF TERRITORY TO TIlE Llf'l OF SPRINGFIELD
(EvanslBetzlOakdale A venue)
Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as required by ORS
199.466. Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for aooroval without
a oublic hearine or further staff study.
There are two alternatives:
1. If you agree with this recommendation, you need do nothing.
2. If you feel that a public hearing is needed, you must request, in writing by
December 14, 2007, that a hearing should be set~ The request must be in the
commission's office by 5:00 p.m., December 14th. You must use the form that is
provided at the end of the staff analysis to request a hearing. For units of
government, the form should be signed by the chairman/mayor or other authorized
person. If you or your unit of government requests a public hearing, the boundary
commission asks that. you attend the r~quested public hearing. If a hearing is
requested, it will be set for the next available boundary commission public
hearing.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING TIlE PROPOSAL OR PROL.tJ.JURE,
PLEASE CONTACT OUR OffiCE (541-682-4425).
Attachments
pt: LeBC. L \BC\EXP\MEMOI2007\ECSP0764 MEM.DOC
Last Savtd. Novtmbtr 26, 2007 -
Date Received'
Plan ler: BJ
? 11,0 i
EXHIBIT B -
P2
EXYlillll.t:.lJ PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVE rnMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
Annexation of Territorv to the City of SDrinefield CEvanslBetz/Oakdale Avenue)
1. BC File EC SP 07 - 64
Initiated by Resolution No. 07-48 by the City of Springfield with property owner consents
. I
ActIOn under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commission law
Received November 29,2007
Public hearing requests by December 26, 2007
DescriDtion
The annexation area includes three tax lots located in northwest Springfield, south of
Oakdale Street, east of Pheasant Boulevard, and west of Game Fann Road; and
including the segment of Oakaale Avenue between Pheasant Boulevard and Game
Farm Road
Property owners: Mike Evans and Geraldine Betz (1071 Harlow Drive, Spnngfield)
I
Tax lots: 2500, 2600, and 2700; T17S R03W S22 Map 42 '
Acres: :f: 1.14 (:f: 0.69 acres in tax lot~; :f: 0.45 acres in road right-of-way)
Estimate of existing population: 1 (ohe single-family residence)
Existing land use: Residential
Existing zoning in Lane County: lDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe
overlay
Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
I
(acknowledged August 1982 and has been subsequently amended)
Existing public services to the proPerty: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County
Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (City of Springfield, Lane
County), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District), fire (Rainbow Water and Fire
District contracting with the City of Springfield), parks (Willamalane Park and
Recreation District), wastewater (onsite individual wastewater system), electricity
(SUB)
Reason for Annexation
The property owners requested annexation in order to }lAt-}lare the annexation area for
I
additional residential develvpA11ent. IThe Eugene-Springfield Metropolit,an Area General
Plan requires properties to annex in order to receive urban services. '
This annexation proposal was filed with the boundary commission on November 29, 2007, in
accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A), irrltiated by the property owner, and ORS 199.466
(expedited procedure). No other privatel~ owned properties are included in the annexation
request. The statutory requirement for consents from owners of more than one-half the land area
and assessed value is met. The City of Spilingfield requested the inclusion of Oakdale A venue
I
between Pheasant Boulevard and Game Fann Road.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 00- 64) - December 14, 2007
Page 1 of9
Date Received'
Planner: BJ
EXHIBIT B - P3
?n,6~__--=
ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing or adoption of a final
order if requested by the principal petitioner. Under the expedited procedure, the boundary
commission executive officer must }ll\:.pare an analysis of the proposal within 15 days from its
receipt. If, after 25 days from the filing date (in this case, December 26th), no written objections
are received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. However, if any
direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the }lWposal is scheduled for the next regular
boundary commission public hearing. Direct recipients are the individuals eligible to request a
public hearing and are listed below under the first boundary commission standard.
The proposed annexation area includes three full tax lots developed with one single-family
residence (refer to Maps No.1 and 2). The owners of the property requested annexation in order
to prepare the property for additional residential development. The segment of Oakdale A venue
included in the annexation area will facilitate the extension of urban services to the annexing tax
lots.
The annexation area is contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. It is located
within the acknowledged urban growth boundary (UGB), which is located about 900 feet to the
northwest.
The existing zoning of the tax lotted portion of the annexation area is LDRIUF-1 0, low-density
residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. It is designated low-density
residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). Upon the
effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically zoned LDR. The LDR
zone is consistent with the low-density residential plan designation.
Resolution No. 07-48, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council on November 5,
2007, indicated that the annexation area can be provided with key urban services and requested
that the resolution be forwarded to the boundary commission.
Following is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards.
ProvilIe an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. ConsilIer the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(J)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
,
This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined
to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary
commission filing requirements). The petitioner requested the proposal be processed using the
expedited procedure.
This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane boundary commission
members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County
Environmental Health Division, City of Springfield, Rainbow Water and Fire District,
Willamalane Park and Recreation District, Michael Evans, and Geraldine Betz.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP07-64)-De~\:.11.lber 14, 2007
Page 2 of9
Date Received:
Planner: BJ
~ ,/1. 6 i~_~~ I BIT B -
P4
The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and FIre District. If the annexation is
approved, the annexation area will be wi~drawn from the water district through separate
proceedings by the City of Springfield in kccordance with ORS 222. Water service will be
F~vyided by the Springfield Utility Board I(SUB) on behalf of the City of Springfield. The
Rainbow Water and Fire District contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services. If
annexation to the city occurs and the annex'ation area is withdrawn from the water district, the
City of-Springfield will provide fire. services Ito the annexed area directly.
This annexation request is in the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. The City of
Springfield is a part of this special district and receives park and recreation services from the
district. After annexation to the city, the annexed }lwperty will remain in the park and recreation
district.
Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane
County Metropolitan Wastewater Service Diktrict [ORS ] 99.51O(2)(c)]. This special district was
formed to provide the financing for the regi Dnal wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater
users within the cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area.
This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified arid make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternative~. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
The annexation area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan and is
contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. Territory within the UGB ultimately will
be within the City of Springfield. Annexati6n of these .lJ.lvyerties and existing road right-of-way
fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro Plarl of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
The incremental process of annexation causes short-term boundaries to be established. The
acknowledged comprehensive plan in this ka identifies the City of Springfield as the unit of
government, which will provide urban servibes to this urbanizable area within the UGB. In the
long term, territory within this geographic ar~a will be annexed to Springfield.
This annexation is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing
policies (l), (2), (5), and (7), which reco~ize annexation to an existing city as the preferred
method of servicing urbanizable land.
(1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service
within urban growth boundari~s when consistent with the comprehensive plan.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP07-64)-December 14,2007
Page 3 of9
EXHIBIT B - P5
Date Received:_,,?:,(?tfg
Planner: BJ
(2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through annexation to a city in order to provide urban services to urbanizable
lands.
(5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth
boundaries.
(7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing
city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable
lands.
hnplementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing
out to an acknowledged UGB. short-term boundaries are created. which are logical within the
context of the future service boundary.
This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield IS consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard.
Make boundary commission determinations, which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet eristing and future growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(l)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d)
The annexation area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the
Land Conservation and Develvl'went Commission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been
subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for
extending the minimum range of urban services to urbanizable areas (policies #8 and #10. page
ll-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be annexed to an existing
city (policy #16. page ll-C-5).
The tax lotted portion of the annexation area is designated as low-density residential in the Metro
Plan. Upon the effective date of the annexation. the private properties will be automatically
rezoned to lDR in the city.
The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in
place to serve this area. The following services are either available or can be extended to the
annexation area.
Water - The Rainbow Water and Fire District provides water service to developed properties in
this region of the urban growth boundary. Following annexation, the City of Springfield will
withdraw the property from the water district in accordance with ORS 222 and the SUB will
provide services directly to the annexation area. Springfield staff indicates that there is an
existing 8-inch water line located in Oakdale Avenue and a 16-inch water line in Pleasant Street
that can serve new development within the annexation area
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP07-64)-December 14,2007
Page 4 of9
EXHIBIT B - P6
Date Received: ~. (1-0 i
Planner: BJ
Electricit't - SUB indicates that it provides :lectric service in this general area and can provide
service to new development within the annex ation area.
Police services - The Springfield police department can provide police protection to the area
after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Springfield police already
provide service to nearby properties within tHe city.
Fire and emerl!encv services - Fire protecti0n is currently provided by the Rainbow Water and
I
Fire District via a contract with the City of Springfield. The city will provide fire protection
services directly to this site after annexatioh. The subject property is within the four minute
I
response time from Springfield fire station #5. located at Pheasant Avenue and Hayden Bridge
Road. If the annexation is approved. the ar~a will be withdrawn from the water district by the
I
City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222.
Emergency medical transport (ambulance: services are provided on a regional basis by
Springfield. Springfield, and Lane Rural FitelRescue to central Lane County. The annexation
area will continue to receive this service cbnsistent with the adopted ambulance service area
(ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have b~en adopted by the three regional ASA providers to
I
provide backup coverage for each other's jmisdictions. '
Parks and recreation - The annexation area is within the Willamalane Park and Recreation
District and will remain in the district after it is annexed to Springfield. The district operates two
aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center. and 31 parks containing a variety of
outdoor recreational amenities. The closest park to the site is Gamebird Park.
Schools - Springfield School District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-Guy Lee
elementary. Hamlin middle. and Sprinhield high-serv~ this neighborhood and can
accommodate students resulting from new develv}lUJent occurring within the annexation area.
Wastewater - Springfield planning staff indicates that the annexation area can be served from an
I
existing 8-inch wastewater line ap}llvximate1y 160 feet west of the site within Oakdale Avenue
west of Pheasant Boulevard. In addition. iliere is a 24-inch wastewater line a}l}lwximately 250
feet south of the site.
Stormwater - A 10-inch storm water pipe is 1 >eated at the intersection of Pheasant Boulevard and
Oakdale A venue that can provide service to new development. Springfield planning staff
indicates that appropriate stormwater management is required in accordance with city standards.
Streets - The tax lotted properties in the annexation area are adjacent to Pheasant Boulevard to
I
the west and Oakdale A venue to the north. The portion of Pheasant Boulevard adjacent to tax lot
2700 is within the city limits and is a city street. Oakdale A venue is outside the city limits
(within the UGB) and is a Lane County maintained road. It is functionally classified as an urban
local road, having a platted right-of-way width of 60 feet. It has a 24-foot paved surface with
curb and gutter on both sides of the street, but no sidewalk adjacent to tax lots 2500 and 2600.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP en - 64)- Decen ber 14.2007
Page 5 of9
Date Received:
Planner: BJ
EXHIBIT B -
~ /1 0<
P7
Sidewalk and street lighting improvements can be obtained with an improvement agreement
during a future development process. The portion of Oakdale A venue between Pheasant
Boulevard and Game Fann Road is included in this annexation. This includes the entire 60-foot
right-of-way for a distance of approximately 300 feet from the intersection with Pheasant
Boulevard to the intersection with Game Fann Road. After annexation, this section of Oakdale
Avenue will continue to be maintained by Lane County. Annexation of the right-of-way will
allow extension of services within the city limits and will continue the connectivity of the city
street system.
Solid waste manal!ement - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the
Lane County administered landfill.
Communication facilities - Various providers, including Qwest and AT&T, offer both wire and
wireless communication services in the Springfield-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing
providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide service to this area.
Land use controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth
boundary. Though an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of
Springfield, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The city
will continue to administer land use controls after annexation.
The minimum level of required services are either immediately available or can be provided
within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
, 199.462(1)
The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an in"~('JJJenta1 step in
implementing the long-range plan for this area. The UGB, land uses, and policies in the Metro
Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use
is consistent with the long-range plans for the area.
This proposed annexation is consistent with this boundary commission standard.
Recommendation
The boundary commission staff recommends that the }lwpOsed annexation to the City of
Springfield (BC File EC SP 07 - 64) be a.l'.l'J.vved without the hearing and staff report as required
by ORS 199.466.
If a public hearing is requested. the proposal will be heard at the next available boundary
commission public hearing. If none is requested it will be approved and effective December 26,
2007 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.519).
,
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP en - 64) - December 14. 2007
Page 6 of9
EXHIBIT B - P8
: ":'te Received' ?/1~L6~____
Planner: BJ
###
Sign and return this form to the boundary -:ommission office ONLY if you desire that a public
hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregon 97401-3111
Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A PUBUC HEARING and STAFF
STUDY be conducted on an annexation of tbrritory to the City of Springfield (EC SP 07 - 64), as
required by ORS 199.461. This form must be filed in the commission office no later than 5:00
p.m., December 26. 2007.
Reason for public hearing:
Date
Signature
Title
Representing
Note: If you or your agency requests a pu1:1ic hearing, the commission asks that you attend the
requested hearing.
pr: LCBC. L:'lJJC\EXP\2007\ECSP0764SN.DOC
Lan Sav~d: NUVmW~T 26, 2007
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 64) - D~"~llber 14. 2007.
Page 7 of9
EXHIBIT B - P9
" "1
MAP No. 1 VICINITY MAP
Annexation to Springfield
(E vanslBetzlOakdale A venue)
EC SP 07 - 64
"Date Received; I~, (1 06
Planner: BJ-
, ,
J
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPC17-64)-December 14, 2007
Page 80f9
EXHIBIT B - P10
Date Received: 1. r1.o~
Plannet: BJ
MAP No. 2 ~u.r.; MAP
Annexation to Springfield
(EvanslBetzlOakdaIe Avenue)
EC SP 07 - 64
/1
\,
1--
ANNEXATION AREA I
- Includes TLs 2500, 2600, 2700, 17-03-22-42; I
Owned by Michael Evans and Geraldine Beti:;
and including a portion of Oakdale A venuel
(ECSP07-64) I
../
~
./
"
I
...,
j
-c
0::
E
lD
LL
GI
E
lD
C)
r
I
\
'...
'1It-; .;. N'" . ----, ... . dI.""'" l
a...._.. ~....~~- .........orMw
. _ J-.-P......,_.... .,.. " .. '.,...,....
~ ; . ;' . ". J l .... ,
I!Ll1 Area to be annexed
I I Tax Lots
EvanslBetz
city limits
-
'-.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 64) - DeceI lber 14, 2007
Page 9 of9
EXHIBIT B - P11
Date Received:
Planner: BJ
3. 1"1 6g
RESOLUTION NO. 07-48
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS.
- WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex 0.69 acre into the City of Springfield on May 9,
2007, said tenitory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700,
including a portion of Oakdale Avenue, and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this
Resolution.
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth
Boundary, and is adjacent to the City Limits; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon
receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in the tenitory proposed to be
annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the tenitory proposed to be annexed and of real
property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory
proposed to be annexed; and,
WHEREAS, the property owners of the certain tenitory described in,Exhibit A signed a consent to annex
(Exhibit B); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.030(2)(a) and ORS
222.111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the tenitory in the
annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services in an
orderly and efficient manner as defined in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, page II-
B-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities;
and
WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defmed in the Eugene-Springfield Metro
Area General Plan, page V -3 as wastewater service, stormwater service, solid waste management, water
service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs,
electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district-
wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the tenitory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of
key urban facilities as described in Attachment 2; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request
for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City supports the applicant's request for expedited Boundary Commission processing.
EXHIBIT B - P12
.-
uate Received' ~.l1,t) ~
Planner: BJ
NOW lHEREFORE BASED ON 1.ti.b FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COMMON COUNCn. OF
lHE CTIY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the
annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary
Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being described as follows).;'
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700,
including a portion of Oakdale Avenue and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this
Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of
Springfield and approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed
annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and
adoption of final order required by ORS 199.461.
Section 4: The City Manager shall forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited
processing to the Lane County Local Government BOlmdary Commission.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 5th day of November, 2007 by a vote
of2-forand~against. (1 absent)
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 5th day of November, 2007.
<\:'
VI/)
Mayor / U
-
AllbST:
City R~,Muj ~
REVIEWED &APPROVED
A~;ORM
\:~ ~ \.....'"f:A~
DATE: \~ h. ".LIen
LEGAL COUNSEL
lH,'cnr TT'T'Tn?\T?\Tn n7 _["R
EXHIBIT B - P13
Date Received:. ., (1 oi
Planner: BJ ..
\ >
.I!.,AW1UT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 of Farmdale Subdivision, recorded in Book 27, Page 28, Lane County Oregon
Plat records in Lane Co~ty, Oregon.
RIGID OF WAY DESCRIPTION
Situated in the City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon, in the northwest quarter of southeast quarter of
Section 22, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian as described as follows:
A portion of the Oakdale Avenue shown on the Farmdale subdivision plat, recorded in Book 27, Page 28
of the Lane County Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon, more particularly descnbed as follows:
Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Farmdale plat; thence westerly along the
southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue as descnbed in said plat 255 feet more or less to the most
westerly northwest comer of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Farmdale plat, said comer also being the intersection
of the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue and the eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard;
thence northerly along said eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard, said right of way also being the
western outer boundary of said plat, 100 feet more or less to the most westerly southwest comer of Lot
17, Block 2 of said plat; thence along the northern right of way of said OakdaIe Avenue 355 feet more or
less to the most easterly southeast comer of Lot 14, Block 2 of said plat; thence crossing said Oakdale
Avenue along the right of way of Game Farm Road to the most easterly northeast comer of Let 1, Block 1
of said plat; thence westerly along the southern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 93 feet more or less
to the point of beginning.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-48
EXHIB'IT B
P14 .
Date Received' ?J1, 0 ~
PROPERlY Owm:t&lanner: BJ
REQUEST FOR EXPED.n~D PROCEDURE
FOR ANNEXATION OR
EAn<.ATERRITORIAL WATER OR WASTEWATER LINE EXTENSION
ORS 199.466
-'
I (JIe), the undersigned property owner(s),-request this ~exation propos~ater line"
extension propo~ €'astewater line extension propos~ be approved without the study, public
hearing or adoption of a final order required by ORS 199.461. This request is made pursuant to
the provisions ofORS 199.466.
I ry./e) understand that a study,'public hearing and adoption of a final ordf?I' may be
required if requested by any person or governing body receiving a copy of the executive officer's
analysis and recommendation as required by ORS 199.466.
This request is made in addition to and supplements all other requirements for filing an
annexation petition or tentative plan for an extraterritorial water or wastewater line extension.
Tax Lot
Tax Lot
Tax Lot
, Township
, Township
, Township
S,Range
S,Range
S,Range
FJW, Section
EJW, Section
F.JW,Section
,Map
. ,Map
,Map
Sienature ofPm...R,ertv QWT.l~ Address
, L.
~
/)~
.- /'
Date: s- ~ _1)-'
.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-48
EXHIBIT B - P15
Date Received"
Planner: BJ
.,. 11. lJ &
Informational Attachment
For the l'H'.I:'osed annexation of ::1::0.69 acre of J:'....perty located at 2793 Pheasant Blvd. The area is
descnbed on Lane County Assessor's Map 17-3-22-42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700.
Zoning
The Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning of the subject l'.v'perty is consistent with the Metropolitan
Area 0,;,..........1 Plan. The p.lvl'erty meets the minimum requirements for parcel size and frontage on an
east-west street (4,500 square feet and 45 feet ofllv...Lage).
Sanitary Sewer
Each lot is undeveloped and is not currently served by sanitary sewer. There is an 8" sanitary line
aJ:'p....~ately 160' west of the site within Oakdale Avenue west of Pheasant Boulevard. There is a 24"
sanitary line approximately 250' south of the site. Each lot must connect to the sanitary service prior to
development.
Solid Waste Management
The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits.
Upon annexation, Sanipac will serve this property.
Water Service
The site is cu... "...dy served by the Rainbow Water District. It will not be served by SUB until July lilt of
the year following the annexation.
Electric
SUB (Springfield Utility Board) is cu.. ......t1y providing eleCtrical service to the lots.
Fire and Life Safety
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application and has determined that :fire and em....6....l1cy services are
available to this site. The subject l'.uperty is within the 4 minute response time of Fire Station #5.
Police Protection
Upon annexation, the area will receive police protection liv..... the City of Springfield. Police protection
and response to priority calls can be provided to this site upon annexation consistent with service
protection throughout the city. .
Parks and Recreation Programs
After annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject property will be within the Willamalane Park and
Recreation District boundmy. City residents receive park and recreation services .fiV.l1A the District. The
District vp.....J:es two aquatic centers, a Community Center, an Adult Activity Center, and 31 parks
containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. A complete listing ofWillamalane's parks and
pro&All.lS can be found on-line at www.Willamalane.orl!, or at 736-4044.
Land Use Controls
The City of Springfield Development Services Department has provided all planning and building
functions for the citizens and .I:'.vl'erty owners of the subject l'.vl'erty. The City of Springfield
Development Services Department will continue to provide land use control for the site after the
annexation.
~F~nTnTTnN Nn_ n7-~R
EXHIBIT B - P16
.Jate Received' 3.11.~ ~
Planner: BJ
Communication Facilities
Qwest and AT&T Cu.u .;..utly provide communications in the area for cable service and an array of wireless
companies provide diff.... WLl~ communication services. The City has no exclusive franchise arrangements
with telecommunication or wireless c"'UI.,tIanies. The field is competitive and therefore guarantees a wide
selection.
Public Schools
Public School services are available through School District 19. Guy Lee Elementary School is
al'l'~vximately ~ mile away on Harlow Road. Hamlin Middle School is approximately 1 mile from the
subject p~u.perty.
Stonnwater Control
Any future development or redevelopment on this site will require a'pp~ul'~~te stormwater management
techniques in accordance with City standards.
Transportation and Right of Way
The subject p<vpeI1y is adjacent to Pheasant Boulevard to the west and Oakdale Avenue to the north. The
portion of Pheasant Boulevard adjacent to tax lot 2700 is a City street Oakdale Avenue is outside the city
limits (within the UGB) and is a Lane County maintained road. It is functionally classified as an Urban
Local road, having a platted right-of-way width of 60 feet. It has a 24' paved surface with curb and gutter
on both sides of the street, but no sidewalk adjacent to tax lots 2500 and 2600. Sidewalk and street
lighting improvements can be obtained with an improvement agreement during the future land division.
That portion of Oakdale Avenue between Pheasant and Game Farm is included in this annexation. This
includes the "4.1L..,;; 60' right of way for a distance of al'l'<,uJrnately 300' from the intersection with
Pheasant Boulevard to the intersection with Game Farm Rd. After annexation, this section of Oakdale
Ave. will continue to be maintained by Lane County. Annexation of the right of way will allow extension
of services without an ';'.iI.I...:.k.u~L....~al agreement and will cv.uL...ue the connectivity of the city street
system.
"
EXHIBIT B - P17
JONES Brenda
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
- ----
TAYlOR Paula L [PT A YlOR@lcog.org]
Friday, December 28.20075:11 PM
JONES Brenda
FW: Annexation (EvanslBetzlOakdale Ave)
Date Received: ~ (1 () ~
Planner: BJ
From:
Sent:
To:
cc:
Subject:
TAYlOR Paula L
Fnday, De(:ember 28, 2007 5:04 PM
SCOUA Connie J; SQlULZ Stephanie E; HOPKINS Steve
Land Planmng Consultants (landplancon@comcastnet)
Annexabon (Evans/Betz/Oakdale Ave)
No public hearing wps requested on the Evans/Betz annexation to the City of Springfield (ECSP07-64),
so the annexation was approved and effective December 26,2007, at the end of the day.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Paula Taylor, ExecutIve Officer
Lane County Local Gv.~ent Boundary Cv..........&Slon
(541) 682-4425
Fax: (541) 682-2635
1