The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAIS PLANNER 3/17/2008 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Department: Staff Contact: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: March 17,2008 Regular Meetmg Development Services JunDonovan~~. . 726-3660 -v." Consent Calen ar' ~ o 'd' ~.11.ci Date r....acelve "^'~._~----'_.. SPRINGFIELD Planner: BJ CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: ACTION REQUESTED: ISSUE STATEMENT: ATTACHMENTS: DISCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMP ACT: RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 07-64, JOURNAL NUMBER LRP2007-00018 (EVANS) Council is requested to conduct a second readIng and adopt/not adopt the attached ordInance' AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS EV ANSIBETZ/OAKDALE A VENUE LOCATED IN THE GA TEW A Y AREA OF NORTWEST SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF GAME FARM ROAD AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY EV ANSIBETZ AND THA T PORTION OF OAKDALE A VENUE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN GAMEF ARM ROAD AND PHEASANT BOULEVARD THE WITHDRAWAL INVOLVES APPROXIMATELY 0 69 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 2500, 2600 AND 2700, Tl7S R03W S22 MAP 42 AND 0 45 ACRES OF OAKDALE AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY (114 ACRES TOTAL), HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222 520) reqUIre that territory located In the Rainbow Water Distnct, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be Withdrawn from that district to prevent double taxatIOn. ORS reqUIres withdrawal prior to March 31 st of each calendar year. The owner requested annexatIOn in order to develop the property for urban use. The subject property was annexed to the City of Springfield effective on December 26, 2007 Attachment 1. Ordinance With Legal Description and Maps, Boundary CommissIOn Staff Report, City CounCil ResolutIOn and Notices of Annexation Adoption Legal notice was published In the Spnngfield News as reqUIred by ORS 222 520 and notices were posted in four public places. City Council conducted a public hearing and first readIng of the ordInance on March 10,2008 .' ORDINANCE NO. v ' 3.{t~ Date Recel ed. .__..__.=-- (SpeciaQ Planner: BJ ...d AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS EVANSlBc I dOAK DALE AVENUE LOCATED IN THE GATEWAY AREA OF NORTWEST SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF GAME FARM ROAD AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY EVANSIBETZ AND THAT PORTION OF OAKDALE AVENUE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN GAME FARM ROAD AND PHEASANT BOULEVARD. THE WITHDRAWAL INVOVLVES APPROXIMATELY 0.69 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 2500,2600 AND 2700, T17S R03W S22 MAP 42 AND 0.45 ACRES OF OAKDALE AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY (1.14 ACRES TOTAL); HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission Number File EC SP 07-64, effective 12/26/07, as recommended in City Planning File No. LRP2007-00018 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07- 48 (and further described in Exhibit A & B), and WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District, and WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no objections raised. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein. Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700, and Oakdale Avenue public right of way between Game Farm Road and Pheasant Boulevard; as more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 07- 64. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008, by a vote of for and against. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 17th day of March 2008, Mayor AI leST: City Recorder ~.;z..-A ._.s \...~ ,~, . '2.. 1:).~. 1 (:) tr I ~ ./ :: :~ I ATTACHMENT 1 - 1 EXHIBIT A - P1 .I!.AJ:1J.Jill A Date Received: Planner: BJ ?;(1.0 ~ PRu!'~TY DESCRu- HON LOts 2. 3 and 4. Black 1 of Farmdale Subdivision. recorded in Book 27. Page 28. Lane County Oregan Plat records in Lane Co~ty. Oregan. RIGIIT OF WAY DESCRIPTION Situated in the City of Springfield, Lane County. Oregan, in the northwest quarter of southeast quarter of Section 22. Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian as described as fallows: A portion of the Oakdale Avenue shawn an the Farmdale subdivision plat. recorded in Book 27. Page 28 of the Lane County Plat Records in Lane County. Oregon, more particularly descnoed as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 1. Block 1 of said Farmdale plat; thence westerly along the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue as descnoed in said plat 255 feet mare or less to the most westerly northwest carner of Lot 4. Black 1 of said Farmdale plat, said comer also being the intersection of the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue and the eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard; thence northerly along said eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard, said right of way also being the western outer boundary of said plat, 100 feet mare or less to the most westerly southwest comer of Lat. 17. Black 2 of said plat; thence along the northern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 355 feet more or less to the most easterly southe3.st carner of Lot 14. Black 2 of said plat; thence crossing said Oakdale Avenue along the right of way of Game Fann Road to the mast eQ,)~liiJ,ly northeast carner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said plat; thence westerly along the southern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 93 feet mare or less to the r..:....~ of beginning. ATTACHMENT 1 - 2 ~ .-..:..-=-:, EXHIBIT A - P2 MAP No. 2 ~JJ.I!.MAP Annexation to Springfield (Evans/BetzJOakdaIe Avenue) ECSP07-64 ' Date Received:.l (1. ?~p _ Planner: BJ /1 \.. -oj ".. ) ./ ~ , .. , 1 -, \. ANNEXATION AREA - Includes TLs 2500, 2600,2700, 17-03-22-42; ~ Owned by Michael Evans and Geraldine Betz; and including a portion of OakdaIe Avenue (Ee SP CIl - 64) -d a: E lD u.. III E lD (!) laLI Area to be annexed I , Tax Lots EvanslBetz city Omits .. . LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 64)- December 14, 2007 Page 9 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 3 EXHIBIT B - P1 Oregon LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 East Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 December 14, 2007 Date Received' ;- (1. o~ Planner: BJ . TO: Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Rainbow Water and Fire District; Michael Evans; and Geraldine Betz FROM: Paula L Taylor. Exe';'llive Offi~ of. ~ SUBJECT: EC SP 07 - 64 (Expedited Procedure) ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE Lu i OF SPRINGl".ll:lL.D (EvanslBetzlOakdale A venue) Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this ..~v..osaL It is sent to you as required by ORS 199.466. Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for auwvval without a Dublic hearine or further staff study. There are two alternatives: 1. If you agree with this recommendation, you need do nothing. 2. If you feel that a public hearing is needed, you must request, in writing by December 14, 2007, that a hearing should be set~ The request must be in the commission's office by 5:00 p.m., December 14th. You must use the form that is provided at the end of the staff analysis to request a hearing. For units of government, the form should be signed by the chairman/mayor or other authorized person. If you or your unit of government requests a public hearing, the boundary commission asks that: you attend the requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be set for the next available boundary commission public hearing. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROLJillURE, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (541-682-4425). Attachments pI: LCBC. L:\JJClEXP\MEMOIl.OO7\ECSP0764 MEM.DOC Last Savrd: NOlImIlNr 26, 2007 . ATTACHMENT 1 - 4 EXHIBIT B P2 Date Received: g,f1 ot Planner: BJ E)u'.I:illlJ~V PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION Annexation of Territorv to the City of SDrine-field llivanslBetzlOakdale Avenue) 1. BC File EC SP 07 - 64 Initiated by Resolution No. 07-48 by the City of Springfield with property owner consents Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commission law Received ~ovember 29,2007 Public hearing requests by December 26, 2007 DescriDtion The annexation area includes three tax lots located in northwest Springfield, south of Oakdale Street, east of Pheasant Boulevard, and west of Game Farm Road; and including the segment of Oakdale A venue between Pheasant Boulevard and Game Farm Road Property owners: Mike Evans and Geraldine Betz (107] Harlow Drive, Spnngficld) Tax lots: 2500, 2600, and 2700; T] 7S R03W S22 Map 42 Acres: :t 1.]4 (:t 0.69 acres in tax lots;:t 0.45 acres in road right-of-way) Estimate of existing population: ] (one single-family residence) Existing land use: Residential Existing zoning in Lane County: LDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (acknowledged August] 982 and has been subsequently amended) Existing public services to the ,plv,perty: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District ]9), roads (City of Springfield, Lane County), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District), fire (Rainbow Water and Frre District contracting with the City of Springfield), parks (Willamalane Park and Recreation District), wastewater (onsite individual wastewater system), electricity (SUB) Reason for Annexation The property owners requested annexation in order to prepare the annexation area for additional residential development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan requires ,plu,perties to annex in order to receive urban services. This annexation ,plv,pOSal was fIled with the boundary commission on November 29, 2007, in accordance with ORS ]99.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by the property owner, and ORS ]99.466 (expedited procedure). No other privately owned j-I!uperties are included in the annexation request. The statutory requirement for consents fluLU owners of more than one-half the land area and assessed value is met. The City of Springfield requested the inclusion of Oakdale A venue between Pheasant Boulevard and Game Farm Road. LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 64) - December] 4, 2007 Page 1 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 5 EXHIBIT B - P3 Date Received: 1;. (1- oi Planner: BJ ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing or adoption of a final order if requested by the principal petitioner. Under the expedited procedure, the boundary commission executive officer must .F1,"yare an analysis of the Ylvyosal within 15 days from its receipt. H. after 25 days IlUm the filing date (in this case. December 26th), no written objections are received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. However. if any direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the YI vyosal is scheduled for the next regular boundary commission public hearing. Direct recipients are the individuals eligible to request a public hearing and are listed below under the first boundary commission standard. The proposed annexation area includes three full tax lots developed' with one single-family residence (refer to Maps No. 1 and 2). The owners of the property requested annexation in order to YI,"yare the property for additional residential development. The segment of Oakdale Avenue included in the annexation area will facilitate the extension of urban services to the annexing tax lots. The annexation area is contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. It is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary (UGB), which is located about 900 feet to the northwest. The existing zoning of the tax lotted portion of the annexation' area is lDRIUF-lO. low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. It is designated low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). Upon the effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically zoned LOR. The lDR zone is consistent with the low-density residential phm designation. Resolution No. 07-48, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council on November 5, 2007, indicated that the annexation area can be provided with key urban services and requested that the resolution be forwarded to the boundary commission. Following is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards. Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the effects of the boundary change o,n other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) , This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary commission filing requirements). The petitioner requested the proposal be processed using the expedited procedure. ) This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane bpundary commission members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County Environmental Health Division, City of Springfield, Rainbow Water and FIre District, Willamalane Park and Recreation District, Michael Evans, and Geraldine Betz. LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP07-64)-De\..,".lllber 14,2007 Page 2 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 6 EXHIBIT B - P4 Date Received: '8 '11. 01 Planner: BJ The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. If the annexation is 4.l-'.l-'loved. the annexation area will be withdrawn from the water district through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. Water service will be plu/ided by the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) on behalf of the City of Springfield. The Rainbow Water and Fire District contracts with the City of Springfield for fIre services. If annexation to the city occurs and the annexation area is withdrawn from the water district, the .City of Springfield will provide fire services to the annexed area directly. This annexation request is in the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. The City of Springfield is a part of this special district and receives park and recreation services from the district. Mter annexation to the city, the annexed property will remain in the park and recreation district. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.510(2)(c)]. This special district was fonned to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area. This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard. Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(1), and 199.410(3)(a) ~~ ' The annexation area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan and is contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Annexation of these plU,perties and existing road right-of-way fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. The in",u;.JllentaI process of annexation causes short-term boundaries to be established. The acknowledged COl.11.l-'I",hensive plan in this area identifies the City of Springfield as',the unit of government, which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area within the UGH. In the long term, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. This annexation is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing policies (1). (2). (5), and (1), which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred method of servicing urbanizable land. (1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan. LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPC17-64)-December 14.2007 Page 3 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 7 EXHIBIT B P5 Date Received: 8.(1. () ~ Planner: BJ (2) This policy expresses the commission's pref"n:'llce for providing urban services through annexation to a city in order to provide urban services to urbanizable lands. (5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries. (7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable lands. Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing out to an acknowledged UGB, short-term boundaries are created, which are logical within the context of the future service boundary. This ....u..qsal to annex tenitory-'to the City of Springfield IS consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard. Make boundary commission determinations, which are consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of pubUc services required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) , The annexation area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Develv",lUent Commission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum range of urban services to urbanizable areas (policies #8 and #10, page ll-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be annexed to an existing city (policy #16, page n-C-5). The tax lotted portion of the annexation area is designated as low-density residential in the Metro Plan. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the private ....vperties will be automatically rezoned to lDR in the city. The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place to serve this area. The following services are either available or can be extended to the annexation area. Water - The Rainbow Water and Fire District provides water service to developed p..uperties in this region of the urban growth boundary. Following annexation, the City of Springfield will withdraw the }/.lvyerty llv.l.l.l the water district in accordance with ORS 222 and the SUB will ....u vide services directly to the annexation area. Springfield staff indicates that there is an existing 8-inch water line located in Oakdale Avenue and a 16-inch water line in Pleasant Street that can serve new develv!'.l.I.lent within the annexation area LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPCJ1-64)-December 14,2007 Page 4 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 8 EXHIBIT B - P6 Date Received' ';;'(1. t?~ Planner: BJ Electricitv - SUB indicates that it provides electric service in this general area and can provide service to new develv",u.lent within the annexation area. Police services - The Springfield police department can provide police protection to the area after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Springfield police already provide service to nearby properties within the city. Fire and emer2encv services - Fire protection is currently provided by the Rainbow Water and Fire District via a contract with the City of Springfield. The city will provide fire protection services directly to this site after annexation. The subject property is within the four minute response time (.lV.l.l.l Springfield fIre station #5, located at Pheasant Avenue and Hayden Bridge Road. If the annexation is Gp....loved, the area will be withdrawn from the water district by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Springfield, Springfield, and Lane Rural FirelRescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will continue to receive this service con~istent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. Parks and recreation - The annexation area is within the WilIamalane Park and Recreation District and will remain in the district after it is annexed to Springfield. The district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center, and 31 parks containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. The closest park to the site is Gamebird Park. Schools - Springfield School District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-Guy Lee elementary, Hamlin middle, and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood and can acconlmodate students resulting from new develv....ment occurring within the annexation area. Wastewater - Springfield planning staff indicates that the annexation area can be served from an existing 8-inch wastewater line G......~vximately 160 feet west of the site within Oakdale Avenue west of Pheasant Boulevard. In addition, there is a 24-inch wastewater line a....p.l vAimately 250 feet south of the site. Stonnwater - A 10-inch stormwater pipe is located at the intersection of Pheasant Boulevard and OakdaIe A venue that can provide service to new develv.....uent. Springfield planning staff indicates that GppJUpriate stormwater management is required in accordance with city standards. Streets - The tax lotted properties in the annexation area are adjacent to Pheasant Boulevard to the west ~d Oakdale A venue to the north. The portion of Pheasant Boulevard adjacent to tax lot 2700 is within the city limits and is a city street. Oakdale A venue is outside the city limits (within the DGB) and is a Lane County maintained road. It is functionally classified as an urban local road, having a platted right-of-way width of 60 feet. It has a 24-foot paved surface with curb and gutter on both sides of the i)l.a'"^'4 but no sidewalk adjacent to tax lots 2500 and 2600. LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPrrT-64)-December 14,2007 Page50f9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 9 EXHIBIT B - P7 Date Received: '? .ii. d ~ Planner: BJ Sidewalk and street lighting improvements can be obtained with an improvement agreement during a future develuyu~ent process. The portion of Oakdale A venue between Pheasant Boulevard and Game Farm Road is included in this annexation. This includes the entire 60-foot right-of-way for a distance of aY'p~uximately 300 feet from the intersection with Pheasant Boulevard to the intersection with Game Farm Road. After annexation, this section of Oakdale Avenue will continue to be maintained by Lane County. Annexation of the right-of-way will allow extension of services within the city limits and will continue the connectivity of the city street system. Solid waste manal!ement - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the Lane County administered landf"Ill. Communication facilities - Various providers, including Qwest and AT&T, offer both wire and wireless communication services in the Springfield-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide service to this area. Land use controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this y~uyerty. The city will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. The minimum level of required services are either immediately available or can be provided > within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard. Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) The annexation tuuyosal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an in"'~,"UJental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The UGB, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use is consistent with the long-range plans for the area. This p~uposed annexation is consistent with this boundary commission standard. Recommendation The boundary commission staff recommends that the y~u'posed annexation to the City of Springfield (BC File EC SP 07 - 64) be appwved without the hearing and staff report as required by ORS 199.466. If a public hearing is requested. the proposal will be heard at the next available boundary commission public hearing. If none is requested it will be ayp~uved and effective December 26, 2007 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.519). LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP07-64)-December 14. 2007 Page60f9 ATTACHMENT 1 -10 EXHIBIT B - P8 ### ., ,Ii, 0 ~ Date Received: Planner: BJ Sign and return this form to the boundary commission office ONLY if you desire that a public hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregon 97401-3111 Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A PUBUC HEARING and STAFF STUDY be conducted on an annexation of territory to the City of Springfield (EC SP 07 - 64), as required by ORS 199.461. This fonn must be filed in the commission office no later than 5:00 p.m., December 26. 2007. Reason for public hearing: " Date Signature Title Representing '. Note: If you or your agency requests a public hearing, the cUJUu.aission asks that you attend the requested hearing. pt: LCSC: 1.. 'VJC\EXP\2007\ECSPU'/64SN.DOC Lzur Saved: Nuvember 26, 2007 LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP (TJ - 64) - De...".LLIber 14~ 2007 Page 7 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 -11 EXHIBIT B - P9 MAP No.1 VICINITY MAP Annexation to Springfield (EvanslBetzlOakdale Avenue) ECSP07-64 " . -, 1".1 c.....lved. ? (1-0 g gate "e liiJ . .....,,~--~--~ planner: BJ F- :, :. 1 N 1" ~ ;;rx:LJ I ~ ~ .~ LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP07-64)-December 14, 2007 Page 8 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 12 EXHIBIT B - P10 1;,11.04 Date Received" Planner: BJ MAP No. 2 ~u.t:MAP Annexation to Springfield , (EvanslBet2l0akdaIe Avenue) ECSP07-64 /1 " .. ./ ;( / , .., i " '- ANNEXATION AREA ~ - Includes TLs 2500, 2600, 2700, 17-03-22-42; ~ Owned by Michael Evans and Geraldine Betz; and including a portion of Oakdale A venue (Ee SP ff7 - 64) -c a:: ~ III LL III E III o IU.lJ Area to be annexed I ~ Tax Lots EvanslBetz city Omits lIB "! ': i"' LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 64) - De.....:..u..ober 14, 2007 Page 9 of9 ATTACHMENT 1 - 13 EXHIBIT B - P11 Date Received" Planner: BJ ~,I1-o~ RESOLUTION NO. 07-48 ' A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN It'..KR.ITORY TO TIlE LU i OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING lHAT lHE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION Ar.t'KOVE lHE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDuw PROCESS, . WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex 0.69 acre into the City of Springfield on May 9, 2007, said tenitory being described as follows: Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700, including a portion of Oakdale Avenue, and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. WHEREAS, the tenitory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is adjacent to the City Limits; and WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the tenitory proposed to be annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the tenitory proposed to be annexed and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory proposed to be annexed; and, WHEREAS, the property owners of the certain territory described in Exhibit A signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); and, WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6,030(2)(a) and ORS 222.111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the territory in the annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services in an orderly and efficient manner as defined in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, page ll- B-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan, page V-3 as wastewater service, stormwater service, solid waste management, water service, fIre and emergency medical services, police p.v~ection, city-wide parkS and recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, con;ununications facilities and services, and public schools on a district- wide basis; and : WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key urban facilities as described in Attachment 2; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Gov~rnment Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the City supports the applicant's request for expedited Boundary Commission processing. ATTACHMENT 1 -14 EXHIBIT B - P12 uate Received: Planner: BJ NOW TIIEREFORE BASED ON l~ FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF ltlh CITY OF SPRING!'lliLD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: '?- {1.o~ Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being described as follows: Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700, including a portion of Oakdale Avenue and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of Springfield and approval by the Mayor. Section 3: The City Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and adoption of final order required by ORS 199.461. Section 4: The City Manager shall forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission. ADOP Hill by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 5th day of November, 2007 by a vote of 2- for and ~ against. (1 absent) APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 5th day of November, 2007. vl?- U Au.tlST: ~ ,MvJ~ City Recorde~ - REVIEWED & APPROVED A~ TO FORM ~\~~ ~~ DATE: L~ b.. '1 hn LEGAL COUNSEL ATTACHMENT 1 - 15 RESOLUTION NO.. 07-48 EXHIBIT B - P13 .I!..A.I:WU.l' A 1;, {1.d ~ Date Reoelved:__.~. 7"""' Planner: BJ PROl'.t.KTY DESCRIPTION Ldts 2. 3 and 4. Block 1 ofFanndale Subdivision. recorded in Book 27. Page 28. Lane County Oregon Plat records in Lane Co~ty. Oregon. , RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION Situated in the City of Springfield, Lane County. Oregon, in the nu.J....est quarter of southeast quarter of Section 22. Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian as descnoed as follows: A portion of the Oakdale Avenue shown on the Farmclale subdivision plat, recorded in Book 27. Page 28 of the Lane County Plat Records in Lane County. Oregon, more particularly descnoed as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 1. Block 1 of said FanndaIe plat; thence westerly along the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue as descnoed in said plat 255 feet more or less to the most westerly northwest comer of Lot 4. Block 1 of said Fanndale plat, said comer also being the intersection of the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue and the e~;""..... right of way of Pheasant Boulevard; , thence northerly along said eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard, said right of way also being the western outer boundary of said plat, 100 feet more or less to the most westerly southwest comer of Lot. 17. Block 2 of said plat; thence along the northern right of way of said OakdaIe Avenue 355 feet more or less to the most easterly southe3st comer of Lot 14. Block 2 of said plat; thence crossing said Oakdale Avenue along the right ofway of Game Fann Road to the most easterly northeast comer of Lot 1. Block 1 of said plat; thence westerly along the southern right ofwa.y of said Oakdale Avenue 93 feet more or less to the point of beginning. ATTACHMENT 1 - 16 RESOLUTION NO. 07-48 EXHIB'IT B - P14 J' Date Received: '_~..(1.:~L--~ . PROPERlY O~ Planner: BJ REQUEST FOR EXPEDn~D PROCEDURE FOR ANNEXATION OR EXTRATERRITORIAL WATER OR WASTEWATER LINE nl~SION ORS 199.466 I (We), the undersigned property owner(s),.request this ~xa.tion r'~ater Ifu: ... . extension prop~ ~astewater line extension proposal) be approved without the study, public hearing or adoption ofa final order required by ORS 199.461. This request is made pursuant to the provisions ofORS 199.466. I (JIc) understand that a study, 'public hearing and adqption of a final ordc;r may be required if requested by any person or governing body receiving a copy of the executive officer's J- analysis and recommendation as required by ORS 199.466. This request is made in addition to and supplements all other requirements for :filing an annexation petition or tentative plan for an extraterritorial water or wastewater line extension. Tax Lot Tax Lot Tax Lot ~ Township , Township , Township S, Range S,Range S,Rmge EJW,Section FlW,Section FJW,Section ,Map ',Map ,Map ~ilZIlature ofPropertv Ownens) i: I--d._ !l.- ~"(;>CT Address A'1~ .- / , . Date: s- ~ _I) I ATTACHMENT 1 - 17 RESOL~ION NO. 07-48 EXHIBIT B - P15 Date Received; ? V]. 0 ~ Planner; BJ Informational Attachment For the }I~u}losed annexation of %0.69 acre of }I~u~ located at 2793 Pheasant Blvd. The area is described on Lane County Assessor's Map 17-3-22-42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700. Zoning The Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning of the subject ,ti"u}lerty is consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Plan. The t'~ u}lerty meets the minimum requirements for parcel size and frontage on an east-west street (4,500 square feet and 45 feet of:G.uulAge). Sanitary Sewer Each lot is undeveloped and is not c\........"....tly served by sanitary sewer. There is an 8" sanitary line a}l}l~"'"..imately 160' west of the site within Oakdale Avenue west of Pheasant Boulevard. There is a 24" sanitary line approximately 250' south of the ~ite. Each lot must connect to the sanitary service prior to development. J Solid Waste Management The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits. Upon annexation, Sanipac will serve this property. Water Service The site is cU.......uJy served by the Rainbow Water District. It will not be served by SUB until July 1st of the year following the annexation. Eli;......... :c SUB (Springfield Utility Board) is Cl...t.........l1y providing el....L.~caI service to the lots. Fire and Life Safety The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application and has determined that tire and em"..c"....cy services are available to this site. The subject }I""'}lerty is within the 4 minute ..".),pOnse time of Fire Station #5. Police Protection Upon annexation, the area will receive police protection :E.u~ the City of Springfield. Police protection and response to priority calIs can be provided to this site upon annexation consistent with service t'~u;.:ction throughout the city. ' Parks and Recreation Programs . , . After annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject property will be within the Willamalane Park and R..:.........tion District boundary. City residents receive park and re........J:i.on services from the District. The District u.l:'''''~es two aquatic centers, a Community Center, an Adult Activity C"...L...., and 31 parks containing a variety of outdoor ..w........~onal amenities. A complete listing ofWillamlllane's parks and pro&UUiS can be found on-line at www.Willamalane.om, or at 736-4044. Land Use Controls The City of Springfield Development Services Department has provided all planning and building functions for the citizens and .I:'~u.l:'.....Lj owners of the subject }I~ut'erty. The City of Springfield Development Services Department will continue to provide land use control ror the site after the annexation. ATTACHMENT 1 - 18 n~~nTITTTnY ~n n7_ha EXHIBIT B - P16 Date Received' ? .l1. Df Planner: BJ ._-~ - Communication Facilities Qwest and AT&T cuu,,~tly provide communications in the area for cable service and an array of wireless CULU.!-,anies provide diff"&Wu.t communication services. The. City has no exclusive franchise arrangements with telecommunication or wireless companies. The field is comp...L:L: -Ie and therefore guarantees a wide selection. Public Schools Public School services are available through School District 19. Guy Lee Elementary School is 8.p}l.l uximately ~ mile away on Harlow Road. Hamlin Middle School is at'l'& ...~ately 1 mile ;"U.l.l.l the subj ect 1'~ ...t'erty. Sto.......~j...ter Control Any future devel"'}'LU.ent or redevelopment on this site will require a.l;'}llU}ll~te stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards. Transportation and Right of Way The subject }'....~ is adjacent to Pheasant Boulevard to the west and Oakdale Avenue to the north. The portion of Pheasant Boulevard' adjacent to tax lot 2700 is a City street Oakdale Avenue is outside the city limits (within the UGB) and is a Lane County maintained road. It is ftmctionally classified as an Urban Local road.. having a platted right-of-way width of 60 feet. It has a 24' paved su.rface with curb and gutter on both sides of the street, but no sidewalk. adjacent to tax lots 2500 and 2600. Sidewalk and street lighting improvements can be obtained with an improvement aO"....LU.ent during the future land division. That portion of Oakdale Avenue between Pheasant and Game Farm is included in this annexation. This includes the ..&AL..... 60' right of way for a distance of "'!-'.I:"&u..Jmately 300' f............ the intersection with Pheasant Boulevard to the intersection with Game Farm Rd. After annexation, this section of Oakdale Ave. will continue to be maintained by Lane County. Annexation of the right of way will allow extension of services without an "...L..a:!.I;;u~lorial agreement and will continue the connectivity of the city street S} ,)~..... , , ATTACHMENT 1 - 19 EXHIBIT B - P17 JONES Brenda From: Sent: To: Subject: TAYLOR Paula L [PT AYLOR@Jcog.org] Friday, December 28, 20075:11 PM JONES Brenda FW: Annexation (EvanslBetzlOakdaJe Ave) Date Received: ?(1.o~ Planner: BJ From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: TAYlOR Paula L Friday, December 28, 2007 5:04 PM SCOUA COnnie Ji SOiULZ Stephanie Ei HOPKINS Steve Land Planning Consultants (Iandplancon@comcastnet) Annexabon (EvanslBet7/Oakdale Ave) No public hearing w~ requested on the Evans/Betz annexation to the City of Springfield (ECSP07-64), $0 the annexation was approved and effective December 26, 2007, at the end of the day. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Paula Taylor, Executive Officet Lane County Local G~.................ent BoundaIy C_--.:ssion (541) 682-4425 Fax: (541) 682-2635 1 ATTACHMENT 1 - 20