The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 5/20/2008 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Prospective Applicant Name: Karl Mueller Phone: 302-9830 Company: Metro Plannmg, Inc Fax: 1-541-610-1805 Address: 370 Q Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: see above Phone: Fax: Company: Address: I Property Owner: Company: Address: I Phone: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17023131 KOlrt, LLC 3400 Mam St Spnngfield, OR 97478 ITAX LOT NO(S): 2200 Fax: Property Address: 3402 Mam St Spnngfield, OR 97477 Size of Property: 5 acres Acres D Square Feet D I Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal descnptlon to this application Proposal: re-zone of rear portIon ofsp!Jt-zoned CC/LOR lot from LOR to MOR Existing Use: CommerCial (front portIOn) # of Lots/Parcels: I IAvg. Lot/Parcel Size: 5 I sf I Density: du/acre Prospective Applicant: s;9natBtJf- Date: May 19,2008 Karl Mueller Print Case No.: 7n" J.a)K./' (tf)l S ()() Application Fee: $ 5Dfo Technical Fee: $0 Reviewed by: ~, --f14 ~- Postage Fee: $0 50/00 TOTAL FEES: $ (0 I v~ ~ , " ,II I', " ;~ >>>. D?t~ R~ECT N~M,B~R:" PRJ""'2008---cx::t?3( t = ' '<, MAY 2 0 2008 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 1 of 3 Original Submittal. , _Development Issues Me_...ing Submittal Requirement~ ~hecklist ~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Kl Development Issues Meeting Application Form ~ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer dunng the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. t8l Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested Information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to Include all of these Items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that Will be denved from the meeting IS commensurate with the level of detail proVided in the application. D D D D D D Applicants are also encouraged to include addItIOnal information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land DIVISIons - PartItions & SubdIvIsIOns - TentatIve Plan SubmIttal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review SubmIttal Requirements. D D Drawn In Ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropnate to, the area Involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area I Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection pOints On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch baSins, dry wells, and natural dralnageways to be retained Area and dimenSions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions D D ApproXimate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots D How streets In the proposal area connect With eXisting streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review D D D Proposed and existing bUildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for bUildings, structures, driveways, Sidewalks, patios and other Impervious surfaces Date Received: Parking and circulation plan MAY 2 0 2008 Original Submittal _ ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 3 of 3 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone Cllf Springfield Official Receipt D lopment Services Department Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 2200800000000000703 Date: OS/20/2008 10:04:38AM Job/Journal Number DescriptIOn ZON2008-00025 CTY Development Issues Mtg Payments: Type of Payment Check Paid By METRO PLANNING Item Total: Check Number AuthOrizatIOn Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 506 00 $506.00 Amount Paid emm 1328 In Person Payment Total: $506 00 $506.00 Date Received: MAY 2 0 2008 Original Submlttf'! cRecemtl Page I of 1 5/20/2008 ETROPLANNING LAND USE PLANNING AND CONSUlTING SERVICES 370 Q STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 (5411 302-9830 FAX 1 (5411 610-1805 Narrative Statement and Questions for a Development Issues Meeting Property Owner KDlrt, LLC Applicant's Rcpresenative: Karl Mueller Metro Planmng 370 Q Street Springfield, OR 97477 Map/Tax Lot: 17-02-31-31 TL 2200 Area of Request Five (5) Acres Proposal: Change the zoning of a portiOn of the subject property from low density residential (LDR) to MedIUm Density ResidentIal (MDR) Narrative Statement The property subJect to this Development Issues Meetmg IS a five acre paIcel owned by KDirt, LLC The applIcant would like to rezone the rear two undeveloped acres of the subject property from LDR to MDR and has requested thiS Development Issues meetll1g to clanfy Issues surroundll1g thiS potential applIcatIOn The property is currently splIt zoned The front portion ofthe property IS developed with Knecht's facIlitIes and the rear portion of the lot is vacant. The forward portIOn of the subJect property IS zoned Community CommerCial and IS shown as CommerCial on the Metro Plan diagram The rear portiOn ofthe subJect propelty IS zoned LDR and appears to be shown as CommerCial on the Metro Plan diagram. The property IS also located 111 f an area covered by the Mld-Spnngfield Refinement Plan The front portIOn of the property IS shown as CommerCial and the rear portIOn of the subject property IS shown as Low Density Resldentjal Two public streets stub to the subject property The Mld-Spnngfield Refinement Plan sets forth cntena for Designatll1g ResidentIal Land Cf Tfena for Deslgnatmg Reszdentzal Land 1 Generally the Medwm Density ResTdentzal (MDR) plan des'lgnatLOn shall be applzed under the followmg circumstances Date Received: MAY 2 0 2008 Original submittal ..... e to serve as a buffer between szngle famzly and commercial uses along mazn street, The applicant believes that the proposed zone change is consistent with the general siting requirements for Medium Density Residential area. It is the applicant's VIew that the subject property IS a large underdeveloped parcel immediately adjacent to commercially designated land on Main Street. Also, the subject property is west of 42nd Street. Finally, the applicant believes the site IS appropriate for medium density residential uses because it could serve as a buffer between the IntenSIve level of commercial development on the front portion of the subject property. This will be discussed further In the analysis of the Low DenSIty ReSIdential siting requirements. The Refinement Plan proVIdes. 2 Generally the Low Densay Residential (LDR) Plan designation shall be applzed under the followzng Clrcumstances a - to large areas of land that are clearly single-famzly in character, b to areas that have not been seriously affected by pockets of zndustrzal or commerczal development, c to areas that are not located directly on Mazn Street . d To areas that are deslgnated .. Yor LDR on the Metro Plan diagram]. The applIcant believes given these sitIng requirements MDR IS arguably more appropriate designation. The area In which the subject property is located is not clearly single family in character. The subJect property IS heavily developed with conflicting commercial uses. The commercial development on the front portIOn of the subject property has seriously and directly impacted the subject property. These impacts seriously undermine the desirability of the site for single family residential development. Few people would desire to own a single family home with such severe impacts as a result of commercial development out the back door The existing development pattern makes the LDR portion of the subJect property more appropriate for MDR development that would provide a transitional reSidentIal zone between the commercial uses to the south and the single family residences to the north. The applicant also finds support for the proposed action in the Residential policies of the Metro Plan Supporting policies include: A.IO Promote higher reSidential density inside the UGB . . . . The applIcant believes that MDR will promote and facilitate hIgher density development within the DGB. A.ll Generally locate higher density residential development near employment or commercial services .. Date Received: MAY 2 0 2008 Original Submittal 'r The applicant submIts that the proposed MDR development is near commercial services. A.13 Increase overall residential area by creating more opportunitIes for effectively designed mfill; The applIcant believes the proposal would proVIde an opportunity for effectIvely designed mfil!. A.17 Provide opportunities for a full range of choice in housing type, density, size, cost and location. The proposal would proVIde a choice in housing type and density. A.23 Reduce impacts of higher density residential; development by considering site. . . regulation. Any future development would be subject to a Site Review process and would have rigorous setback and other such requirements that would minimize impacts consistent wIth this policy. A.30 Balance the need to provide a sufficient amount of land to accommodate affordable housing with the community's goals to maintain compact urban form. The applicant submits that the site could provide affordable medIUm denSIty reSIdential housing and through increased on-SIte density furthers the goal of maintaining a compact urban form. The applicant has identified numerous Refinement and Metro Plan policies that support the request and has not identified any policies that directly conflict with the proposed ZOnIng Questions: Though the applicant finds support for the proposal in the Metro Plan and Refinement Plan preliminary discussions have not been favorable. Does staff believe the Refinement Plan or Metro Plan policies prohibit or dIscourage the proposal? If so which poliCIes? Are there siting requirement the applicant has failed to identIfy that prohIbIt the proposal? 2. Should the applicant deCIde to proceed with the proposal would a partition be required prior to/concurrent with the other application or not required at all? 3. Are there any other large undeveloped parcels fitting the siting requirements for MDR in the Mid-Springfield area? Date Received:' MAY 2 0 2008 Original submittaL . 4. The only Metro Plan language cited by staff in our preliminary investigation as prohibiting the proposed action is the language on page II-G-2 that provides: Certain land uses are not of metropolitan wide sIgmficance in terms of size or locatIon because of their special nature or limited extent. Therefore, it is not advisable to account for most of them on the Metro Plan diagram Does Springfield staff believe that thIS language prohibits the proposed zone change? Could the language be mterpreted to mean that a Metro Plan diagram is not required as part of this land use application-particularly given the following language further in the paragraph' [The diagram] is not intended to Invalidate. . . uses which are not sufficiently intensive or large enough to be included on the Metro Plan diagram. 5. What land use application would be required should the applicant desire to proceed? Date Received: MAY 2 0 2008 Original Submittal ~ ~<< * ' 1~ \" " '" ~A:J '" " '" ,. %' ,~ v.... 17-02-31-31 T o.x Lot 2200 3402 Mo.in Street Date Received: ~, MAY 2 0 2008 "* Original SubmIttal. ,---~- - I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2008-00025 KDirt LLC 3402 Main Street ;;: . ~1i{~~ '~7h.;:;. -- --I -~ ".'" ~ '" - Cll ! . ~ ~t "'~ I=:: f- :i Ij" :00 i Eo ~h- o~ El ~ C/),~ ?: a=: i :c ' ~ C\l ('t) !i ~ ' i3-s~f ~. " ~ ~I, ~ I , '?j., I Ql' '~ ',' . ..,-~ l~S~ ~IN s:lJl. . ~r~ I .,' I '~' -LLL. -"- "",.,;cOl ,I SITE Map 17-02-31-31 Tax Lot 2200 North i :r: -- ~~ I -.a . ,-, - JltiA:t ,MST' ~ I Date Received: MAY 2 0 2008 Original Submittal LAFLEUR Karen Subject: Location: ZON2008-00025 Development Issues Meeting - KDIRT LLC - Mark Metzger _SP _ConfRm616 Thu 6/12/20081 30 PM Thu 6/12/2008 2'30 PM Start: End: Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Required Attendees: LAFLEUR Karen; METZGER Mark, Englneenng Group (DIMs), MCKENNEY Gary, GORDON Gilbert, Michael Wilbur (Mlchael.J Wilbur@ODOT state or.us); DRISCOLL Jon _SP _ConfRm616 Resources: A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, June 12, 2008 @ 1 30 - 230 P m in DSD 616 The planner assigned to thiS application is Mark Metzger The applicant submitted plans to discuss a partial rezone of 2 acres of a 5 acre parcel. The parcel currently has split zoning (CC/LDR) The applicant would like to rezone the rear two undeveloped acres of the property from LDR to MDR Please confirm your attendance at this meeting. Thanks.. Karen Date Received: MAY 2 0 2008 Original Submittal 1