HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PWE 2/1/2007 (2)
Page 1 of2
LlMBIRD Andrew
From: ENOS Gene
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8 24 AM
To: L1MBIRD Andrew
Cc: WRIGHT Denny, Renee@branchenglneerlng com
Subject: RE McElhany status
Attachments: ENOS Gene vcf
As I stated In the 1/8/2007 e-mail to Andrew, the sidewalks on 32nd Street (as explained to the contractor several
times) are reqUIred to be "removed and reolaced" as part of the R-O-W inspection required for that address The
current construction on the eXisting set-back sidewalks are 4 Inches In depth As per standard drawing #3-21, the
required depth is "6 Inches of 3,000 pSI field strength (3,450 pSI lab strength), 6 0 sack mix concrete Dn 2 Inches
of compacted 3/4 " minus crushed rock
The work was set-up as "one inspection site or address" All inspections remains under the onglnal address, even
though the address at the corner appears completed The current site Improvements have Dot been completed,
and the status for the R-O-W inspection status remains "pending" until the corrective reqUIrements are satisfied
Presently, the sidewalk work does require an additional inspection (which needs to be scheduled), and this too
was discussed with the contractor I was fully prepared to conduct the Inspection for the sidewalks when the
approaches off 32nd street and the adjoining work were Inspected, but the contractor was not prepared at that
time
Please advise me when the sidewalk Improvement work has been completed and I will conduct a site VISit to
venfy and Inspect at that time If there are any more questions, please feel free to contact me
Thank you
Gene Enos
Const Insp
City Of Spnngfield
P W Dept / Eng DIV
Office 726-6026
Fax 736-1021
From: WRIGHT Denny
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12 06
To: ENOS Gene
Subject: FW: McElhany status
Gene -
Did you Inspect thiS?
Denny
From: LIMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, January 30,2007 11:45 AM
To: Renee Clough
Cc: WRIGHT Denny
Subject: RE: McElhany status
2/1/2007
Page 2 of2
HI Renee, I have received confirmation from the Electncallnspector that Condition 12 has been satisfied
However, when I inqUired about the curb and sidewalk work (S 32nd Street frontage) a few weeks ago the
Englneenng Inspector adVised that It had not been completed satisfactorily In my estimation Conditions 3 and 4
are outstanding Items that still have to be satisfied before plat If there have been any recent changes, please let
me know and I can arrange for a site VISit Thanks
Andy
From: Renee Clough (mallto:Renee@branchengrneering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 9:35 AM
To: UMBIRD Andrew
Subject: McElhany status
Andy,
I am prepanng to submit a revised plan set to the survey department for the McElhany partition at S 32nd St and
Virginia Ave In the pre-submittal meeting on January 5, you said that you would check with the bUlldtng
department on the status of Conditions 3, 4, and 12 Does any additional work need to occur to comply with
those conditions?
Thanks,
Renee
2/1/2007