Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 7/30/2007 " f 'I ~~ p'- '\ .-/ ~OfVCL UQ ~ (-30--D7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE srATE OF OREGON) ) ss. County of Lane ) I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do 'hereby depose and say as follows: 1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the Development Services Department. City of Sprmgfield, Oregon. , 2. I state that in my capacity as, Program: Technician, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies ofSUB2.Do7'll0033 l\fifU--Ld):. ~- PaM.:J..wd; (See attachment If A H) on -V3..t> ' 2007 addressed to (see Attachment BIf), by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with postage fully prepaid thereon. I K~~ ~~ STATE OF OREGON. Cou,nty of Lane -1'1 it A,. 30 ( , 2007. Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur, ~Technicia~, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act. Before me' - -........~~..."'-'...,~ . - ._. ,_.__" .e._ ~- , F&- ~ OFFICIAL SEAL f t BRENDA JONES I, NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON ~ ' COMMISSION NO 379218 '~ MY COMMISS1~J~I~~S ~~OJ.. . ~-~,.-..,..... .-.~ ~('~ My Commission EXPilJ.: ~?1. :Jt;J t -----+ /) Notice of Decision - Partition Tentative Plan Project Name: Partition - Launnat Project Proposal: Partition one lot (1.70 acres) Into two parcels Case Number: SUB200/0033 Project Location: 17"-22-00 detail map I, TL 2708 ()$ Zoning: CC 11- _ 0 ? _ '- 2- - 0 c) d- (J TL:Z- 9 Metro Plan Designation: CC Refinement Plan: Gateway Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: May IS, 2007 Application Submitted Date: June 14,2007 Decision Issued Date: July 30, 2007 Recommendation: Approval with Conditions Appeal Deadline Date: August 14, 2007 Associated Applications: PRE2007-00028, DRC2006-00022 Tree Felling, PRE 2006-00026 Pre-submittal for Site Plan (expired), SUB2003-00022 Partition (Fire Station Property) I Deputy Fire Marshall I Community Services Manager I I 'f, APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM APPLICANT/OWNER APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE Jason Goshert SS and W Inc Engmeers 2350 Oakmont Way, SUite 150 Eugene, OR 9740 I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM REVIEW OF NAME Land Use Planning . Linda Pauly Transportation Gary McKenney Sanitary & Storm Sewer, Jesse Jones Utilities Fire and Life Safety Building .] PHONE . '1 726-4608 1 726-4585 736-1036 I ' ' I POSITION I Planner 3 I Transportation Planning Engineer Public Works Civil Engineer Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent 726-2293 I 726-3668 '" Dr Larry Launnat 3-D ProfeSSional Group, LLC 175 B Street, Buildmg B Sprmgfield, OR 97477 Partition Tentative Plan Case No SUB2007-00033 SITE VICINITY: Proposed Partition Site Between Pheasant Boulevard and Game Farm Road Game Farm Road Hayden Bridge Road Pioneer Parkway Decision: Tentative A~~roval with conditions, as of the date of thiS letter. The standards of the Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) applicable to each cntenon of Partition approval are listed herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes unless specifically noted with findmgs and conditions necessary for compliance All imorovements are reaUlred to be mstalled as shown on the aooroved olan or as conditioned. Anv orooosed chanl!es to the tentative olan must be submitted to the Plannml! DIvIsion and aooroved onor to mstallatlon. The Partition Plat must conform to the submitted plans as conditioned herem. ThiS IS a limited land use decIsion made accordmg to city code and state statutes. Unless appealed, the decIsion IS final. Please read thiS document carefully. Other Uses Authorized by the Decision: None. Future development will be In accordance with the provIsions of the SDC, filed easements and agreements, and all applicable local, state and federal regulations. Review Process: ThiS application is re/lewed under Type II procedurf"s listed In SDC 3.080, the Partition Cnteria of Approval, SDC 34.050, and the Partition Standards of Article 34. The application was found to be complete upon submittal on June 14, 2007. ThiS decIsion IS Issued on the 47th day of the 120-day review penod. SITE DESCRIPTION/ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES:. The 1.7 acre development site IS currently undeveloped. The property IS zoned Community Commercial (CC) by the Spnngfield Zonmg Map, and designated CC by the Metro Area General Plan and the Gateway Reftnement Plan. The northern and southern boundanes of the property abut Community Commercial (CC) zoned land. land west of Pheasant Boulevard IS zoned CC, land east of Game Farm Road IS zoned low Density Residential (lDR). The eastern property Ime of the site abuts Game Farm Road, a lane County facility. The western boundary Ime abuts the Partition TentatIve Plan SUB2007-00033 2 " nght of way of Pheasant Boulevard, a City of Spnngfield public street. Site topography IS relatively level. The land IS vegetated with mature trees and grass Comments Received: Applications for Type II limited land Use DeCISions require notification of property owners/occupants wlthm 300 feet of the subject property which allows for a 14 day comment penod on the application (SDC 3.080 and 14 030). The applicant and parties submlttmg wntten comments dunng the notice penod have appeal nghts and are mailed a copy of this deCISion for consideration. In accordance With SDC 3 080 and 14030, notice was mailed to owner/occupants wlthm 300 feet of the subject site on June 19, 2007. No comments were received m response to the notice SDC 34.050 Criteria of Approval - Partition Tentative Plan SDC 34.050 states that the Director shall approve or approve With conditions a Partition Tentative Plan application upon determmlng that Crltena (I) through (9) of this Section have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the cntena, the Director shall deny the application. SDC 34 050 (I) Criterion I: The request as conditioned fully conforms to the requirements of this Code . pertaining to lot size and dimensions. Finding: The applicant proposes to create a two-lot partition. The proposed parcel sizes are' Proposed Parcel I 35,796 square feet (0.82 acres) With 210.6 feet of frontage on Pheasant Boulevard Proposed Parcel 2 38,417 square feet With 211 2 feet of frontage on Game Farm Road Finding: The proposed lots exceed the 6,000 square feet minimum lot size and the 50-foot minimum street frontage requirements of SDC 18.030 (I). The proposed lot sizes and frontages meet the standards of SDC 18030 (I). Conclusion: The' proposal satisfies Criterion I. SDC 34.050 (2) _ Criterion 2: The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Finding: The subject property IS located Within the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district. Finding: The subject property IS deSignated Community Commercial as shown In the Metro Plan diagram and Gateway Reftnement Plan. _ Conclusion: The zoning of the subject property IS consistent With the Metro Plan deSignation. No change to the zoning deSignation or boundanes IS proposed. The proposal satisfies Criterion 2. PartitIOn Tentative Plan SUB2 00 7-00033 3 sDc 34.050 (3) Criterion 3: Capacity requirements of public improvements, including but not limited to water and electricity; sanitary sewer and storm water management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. sDc 34 050 (4) Criterion 4: The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Finding The Public Works Director's representatives have reviewed the proposed partition City staffs review comments have been Incorporated In findmgs and conditions contained herem Finding: Crltenon 3 and 4 contam different elements With sub-elements and applicable code standards. The oartltlon aoollcatlon as submitted comolles With the aopllcable code standards listed under each sub-element unless otherwise noted With speCific findmQ:s and conclUSions The elements, sub-elements and code standards of Cntenon 3 and 4 mclude but are not limited to' Public and Pnvate Improvements m Accordance With SDC 31 and 32 . Public Streets and Related Improvements [SDC 32020-32.090] . Sanitary Sewer Improvements [SDC 32.100] . Storm Water Management [SDC 32.110, 31.240] . Water and Electric Improvements [SDC 32.120( I n . Fire and life Safety Improvements [SDC 32.120(3)] . Public and Pnvate Easements [SDC 32.120( I) and (5)] Conformance With standards of SDC 31, Site Plan ReView, and Article 18, Commercial Zonmg Districts . lot Coverage and Setbacks [SDC 18.040 - 18.050] . Height Standards [SDC 18.060] . Off-Street Parking Standards [SDC 18.070 and 31.170-230] . Fence Standards [SDC 18.100] . landscapmg Standards [SDC 31.130-150] . Screenmg and llghtmg [SDC 31.160] Conformance With Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan ReqUirements . Gateway Refinement Plan Public and Private Improvements in Accordance with SDC Articles 31 and 32 Finding: The Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed partition and the surroundmg public services. Except for the follOWing, eXisting or planned public Improvements are suffiCient to serve the proposed parcels. PUBLIC STREETS AND RElATED IMPROVEMENTS Partition Tentative Plan SUB2 00 7-00033 4 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPAas SDC 32.020 (1)( c) states All lots/parcels shall have approved access to a public street or alley. Finding: The subJect property,abuts Pheasant Boulevard. a 40-foot wide asphalt paved roadway wlthm a 80-foot wide right of way along Its western boundary: The street IS Improved with curb/gutter and sidewalk. An eXlstmg street Iightmg IS located north of the subJect site Average daily traffic along thiS street IS estimated to be less than 2,000 vehicle tripS per day. Finding: The subJect property abuts Game Farm. a 34-foot wide asphalt paved roadway wlthm a 55-foot wide lane County right of way along the eastern boundary. The street IS Improved with curb/gutter and sidewalk along the west side of Game Farm Road: Street Iightmgfexlsts along the east side of the roadway. Average daily traffic along thiS street IS estimated to be approximately 10,000 vehicle tripS per day. Finding: In addition, assumed development may generate pedestrian and bicycle tripS Accordmg to the "Household" survey done by lCOG m 1994, 12.6 percent of household tripS are made by bicycle or walkmg and 1.8 percent are by transit bus. These tripS may have their orlgms or destinations at a variety of land uses, mcludlng thiS site Pedestrian and bicycle tripS create the need for Sidewalks, pedestrian crossmg Signals, crosswalks, bicycle parkmg and bicyCle lanes Finding: EXisting and proposed transportation facIlities would be adequate to accommodate additional vehicular and pedestnan traffic generated by development on the proposed new parcel m a safe and effiCient manner. Finding: No eXlstmg curb cuts prOVide access to the subJect property. However, based on the applicant's proposal, future access for Parcel I would be via Pheasant Boulevard, and future access for Parcel 2 would be via Game Farm Road. At the time of thiS decIsion, no approved access eXists for proposed Parcel 2 as required by SDC 32.020 (I )(c). Driveway access from Game Farm Road Will require a permit from lane County. ' NOTE: lane County staff reviewed thiS proposal and prOVided comments (see Attachment I). The applicant IS adVised to contact the lane County Public Works Department for lane County FaCIlity Permit requirements and/or waivers to their requirements. Condition I: Prior to Plat approval, the applicant shall prOVide eVidence of an approved faCility permit from Lane County for access to Parcel 2; OR record a Jomt use access easement across Parcel I to benefit Parcel 2 and allow access from Pheasant Boulevard [SDC 32.020 (1)( c) ]. SANITARY SEWER SDC 32 100 (I) states. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect the developments to existing mains. Finding: The proposed sanitary sewer connection point for parcels I and 2 IS at the eXlstmg sanitary manhole along th,e southern edge of the subJect property. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SDC 32.110 (2) states: The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions Partition Tentative Plan SUB2 00 7-00033 5 have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. SDC 32.110 (4) requires that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficIent capacity to accept the discharge. / SDC 32 110 (5) requires new developments to employ dramage management practices, which minimiZe the amount and rate of surface water run-off Into receiving streams, and which promote water quality SDC 32.110 (2) states: The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Finding: The applicant proposes to connect to the eXisting private stormwater pipe located on tax lot 2708. Finding: The capacity of the stormwater system IS limited and future development may require the use of detention ponds or other stormwater management technology. Subsequent development of each parcel wdllikely reqUire a stormwater management system study. NOTE: lane County staff reviewed thiS proposal and prOVided the follOWing comments. The parcels shall provIde on-sIte storm water management No drainage shall be permitted from the private property onto Game Farm Road pursuant to the follOWing Lc Manual. Lane Manual 15.5 15 - Drainage I. RoadSIde dItches and other drainage faCIlItIes shall be desIgned solely to promote drainage of the County Road WIthOut interfering WIth natural waterways. Whenever a road crosses a natural channel or waterway, culverts shall be Installed to maintain the natural water flow. Such natural waterway shall be Identlfted by survey of the topography and/or aerial photography of surrounding terrain. II. Water shall not be dIverted from a natural channel or otherwIse from private property down a County or publIc roadSIde dItch. EASEMENTS SDC 32.120 (5)(a) states. An applicant proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area. The minimum ~idth for public utility easements adjacent to street rights of way shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility easements shall be 14 feet. However, the utility provider or the Public Works Director may require a larger easement for major water mains, major electric power transmission lines, sanitary sewer lines, stormwater management systems or in any other situation to allow maintenance vehicles to set up and perform the required maintenance or to accommodate multiple utility lines. Where feasible, utility easements shall be centered on a lot line. ~ Finding: The applicant proposes a 7-foot private sanitary sewer easement across part of Parcel I to benefit Parcel 2. PartItIOn Tentative Plan - SUB2 00 7-00033 6 Finding: The proposed private storm sewer stubs for lot 2708 Parcels I and 2 require easements and maintenance agreements with lots 2709 and 2710 ThiS requirement IS part of the private storm sewer final inspection approval. Condition 2: Prior to Plat approval, the applicant shall provide mamtenance agreements for the private storm sewer system between lot 2708 (parcels I and 2) and lots 2709 and 2710 [SDC 32.120 (5)(a)] UTILITIES AND UTILITY EASEMENTS Finding: Springfield Utility Board (SUB) Will provide water and electriC service to the lots. Conclusion: As conditioned, thiS sub-element of the criterion IS satisfied. Conformance with standards of SDC 3 I, Site Plan Review, and SDC 18, Commercial Zoning Finding: The Development Review Committee reviewed the propo'sed 2-parcel partition and the eXlstmg Improvements No Article 31 development standards are applicable to thiS development. Conformance With the SDC Article 31 standards Will be required at Site Plan Review. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies the sub-element of the criterion. Conformance With Overlay Districts' and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements Finding: Gateway Refinement 'Plan requirements are addressed under Criterion 6 There are no applicable Overlay Districts. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Criterion 3 and 4. sDc 34 050 (5) Criterion 5: Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize curb cuts on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations, and comply with the ODOT access management standards for state highways. SITE ACCESS AND DRIVEWA Y STANDARDS Finding: Installation of driveways on a street mcreases the number of traffic conflict pomts. The greater number of conflict pOints Increases the probability of traffic crashes. SDC 32.080( I) (a) states that each parcellS entitled to an approved access to a public street. Finding: The Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed 2-parcel partition and the eXisting improvements No driveways are proposed In the appll'catlon. Development of the parcels will require Site Plan Review. Access to Game Farm Road Will require a faCIlities permit from Lane County. Partition TentatIVe Plan SUB2007-00033 7 Conclusion: Ingress-egress pOints will be planned to facilitate traffic and pedestrian safety, avoid congestion and to minimiZe curb cuts on public streets as speCified In SDC Articles 3 I and 32, applicable zoning and or overlay district Articles, and applicable refinement plans. Therefore, the proposal satisfies Criterion 5. sDc 34.050 (6) Criterion 6: Physical features, including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings and historic features have been evaluated and protected as specified in the Springfield Development Code or other applicable regulations. Finding: The Metro Area General Plan. Gateway Refinement Plan, Water Quality limited Watercourse Map, State Designated Wetlands Map, Hydric Soils Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps and the list of Historic landmark sites have been consulted and except as noted below there are no features which are required to be protected or preserved on this site. If any artifacts are found dUring construction, there are state laws that could apply; ORS 97.740, ORS 358.905, ORS 390235. If human remams are discovered dUring construction, It IS a Class "C" felony to proceed under ORS 97.740. SIGNIFICANT CLUSTERS OF TREES Finding: A Significant cluster of trees IS located on the Partition site. The property partially encompasses a grove of mature trees that IS Identified as a natural asset m the Gateway Reftnement Plan. The trees are labeled "other prominent ~egetatlon" on Natural Assets Map I. SDC 34.050 (6) requires evaluation and protection of this Significant cluster of trees as required by this Code. SDC 34.070 (9) states that conditions of approval may be placed on the Tentative Plan to the extent necessary to retain and protect eXlsttng physIcal features and their functions, mcludtng Significant clusters of trees and shrubs, by: a) Re-vegetatlon, including but not limited to trees and native plants; c) Restoration of native vegetation; , e) Relocating the proposed development on another portion of the site; f) Reducmg the size of the proposed development; and/or g) Mitigation of the loss of phYSical features caused by the proposed development With an equivalent replacement either on site or on an approved site elsewhere wlthm the City's JUrISdiction, as approved by the Director. Refinement Plan Goal I states: "Provide for development of the Gateway Refinement Plan area that is sensitive to and integrates, to the maximum degree practicable, the. multiple functions and values associated with the area's natural assets, open space/scenic areas, and recreation opportunities." Refinement Plan Policy 8.4 states. "Through the site plan review process, the City shall encourage reasonable retention of existing trees, paying particular attention to those inventoried in this Element as prominent and plentiful vegetation." Background: The property owners were Informed about the special status of the trees prior to application submittal, and were told that retention to the greatest extent practicable would be reqUired when developmg the site. To Implement the Gateway Refinement Plan policy, It Partition TentatIVe Plan SUB2007-00033 8 was necessary to assess the health of the trees to make a determination about how best to "maintain prominent mature vegetation for its scenic, air filtration, and noise reduction qualities to the greatest degree practicable" (Gateway Refinement Plan Natural Assets, Open Space/Scenic Areas, and Recreation Element, Goal 9). To assist m the Implementation of the refinement plan goal and policy, the CIty Planning D,v,sIon contracted with two professional consultants to gather the information needed to assist with decIsion making concernmg preservation and/or replacement of die trees. A certified arborlSt, Nathaniel Sperry of Sperry Tree Care, evaluated the health of the trees and prepared an arbonst report, Game Farm Road Tree Evaluation, for the entire grove. Ann ChrIStensen prepared VegetatIOn/RevegetatIOn Plan for the Game Farm Road Grove to prOVide gUidance for future site development. These reports were made available to the applicant. The owners were Informed that all tree felling and revegetation wlthm the Grove area shall be m conformance With the Game Farm Road Tree EvaluatIOn and the Vegetation/RevegetatIon Plan for the Game Farm Road Grove. Finding: The subject property has a Tree Felling permit pending development approval and the signing of a Site Plan development agreement - See Notice of DeCISIon DRC2006-00022. As conditioned In the Tree Felling Notice of the Significant clusters of trees on the site have been protected and/or Will be mitigated through revegetation of the site upon development. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies Criterion 6. sDc 34.050 (7) Criterion 7: Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code. Finding: There IS no other adJomlng property under the same ownership that can be further developed. Conclusion: ThiS proposal satisfies Criterion 7. sDc 34.050 (8) Criterion 8: Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development in accordance with the provisions of the Springfield D,evelopment Code. Finding: AdJacent land IS currently developed and has access to public streets. Conclusion: Approval of thiS partItion does not prevent development of adJacent land, or prevent access to allow future development. Therefore, the proposal satisfies Criterion 8. sDc 34.050 (9) Criterion 9: When there is not a concurrent annexation application submitted with a Partition Tentative Plan on property that is outside of the City limits but within the City's urban services area, the standards specified in Section 29.070(5) of the Springfield Development Code shall also apply. Finding: Criterion 9 is not applicable to the subJect property. Annexation has been approved by the City CounCil and Boundary CommiSSion and will be effective prior to recordation of the plat. PartItIon Tentative Plan SUB2007-00033 9 CONCLUSION: SDC 34.050 states that the Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Partition Tentative Plan application upon determlnmg that criteria (I) through (9) of this Section have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the criteria, the Director shall deny the application. The tentative partition, as submitted and conditioned, complies With Criteria 1-9 of SDC 34.050 Portions of the proposal approved as submitted may not be substantively changed durmg plattmg Without an approved modification application In accordance With SDC 34.100. What Needs To Be Done? The Applicant will have up to one year from the date of this letter to meet any of the attached conditions of Tentative Plan approval. SDC 34.090 (I) states: A Partition Plat Pre-submittal Meeting shall be held within one year from the date of Tentative Plan approval (the date of thiS letter.) The mylars and application fee shall be submitted within 180 days of the Pre-submittal Meeting. If the applicant has not submitted the Partition Plat within these times, Tentative Plan approval shall become null and void and re-submittal of the Tentative Plan shall be required. A Fmal Plat application IS charged upon submittal of the complete application and all required documents, and after all conditions of approval are met, mcludmg the construction of public and private Improvements and extension of utilities required through thiS deCISion. Upon signature by the Oty Surveyor and the Plannmg Manager, the Plat mylar may be submitted to lane County for recordation. No individual lots mav be transferred until the Plat is recorded and the mvlar coov of the filed oartition is returned to the Citv Survevor. and until the aoolicant submits five cooies of the recorded oartition olat and one coov of other - - - -- recorded documents to the Develo~ment Services Deoartment.. Conditions of Aooroval: Condition I: Pnor to Plat approval, the applicant shall prOVide eVidence of an approved faCility permit from lane County for access to Parcel 2; OR record a Jomt use access easement across Parcel I to benefit Parcel 2 and allow access from Pheasant Boulevard [SDC 32.020 (I )(c) ]. Condition 2: Prior to Plat approval, the applicant shall prOVide maintenance agreements for the private storm sewer system between lot 2708 (parcels I and 2) and lots 2709 and 2710 [SDC 32.120 (5)(a)]. Additional Information: The application, all documents, and eVidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable crltena of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available for a fee at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Appeal: ThiS Type II Tentative Partition decIsion is conSidered a decIsion of the Director and as such may be appealed to the Planning Commission. The appeal may be filed With the Development Services Department by an affected party. The appeal m~st be In accordance With SDC, Article 15, Appeals. An Appeals application must be submitted to the City With a fee of $250.00. The fee will be returned to the appellant If the Plannmg Commission approves the appeal application. Partition TentatIve Plan SUB2 00 7-00033 10 ~'- ~" . . In accordance with SDC 15.020 which provides for a IS-day appeal penod and Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule I O( c) for service of notice by mail, the appeal penod for this decIsion expires at 5:00 p.m. on August 14,2007. Questions: Please call llnda Pauly In the Planning DIvIsion of the Development Services Department at (541) 726-4608 If you have any questions regarding this process. Prepared by: lmda Pauly Planner 3 Development Services - Urban Planning DIvIsion PartitIon Tentative Plan SUB2007-00033 11 r ATTACHMENT '1 PAULY Linda From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: BAJRACHARYA Shashl [Shashl BAJRACHARYA@co lane or us] Monday, July 02, 2007409 PM PAULY Linda BAJRACHARYA Shashl, BARRY Celia, FIELDS Phil, LEMHOUSE Brad, PETSCH John S PRE2007-00028,Partltlon,Launnat, Game Farm Rd RE: TP Flle# 9082 for PRE2007-00028 proposal Create 2 parcels Appllcant: Larry Laurlnat Assessors Map 17-03-22-00, TL 2708 Address. Vacant, Comments from Lane County Transportation Planning The subject property is located lnslde the Clty of springfield Clty Limits. The property abuts on two roads. The west edge abuts on Pheasant Blvd. and the easterly edge abuts on Game Farm Rd. Game Farm Rd lS a county road which lS functlonally classifled as an Urban MaJor Collector Rd in the Lane County Transportation System Plan. It lS a 24 feet wide, paved road with shoulder, curb and gutter along one slde (along the property edge). The segment of the road is posted for a speed limit of 35 mph. The subject property is proposed for partltion into 2 parcels. As a result of the partltion parcel #1 will have frontage on the C1ty road and parcel # 2 on the county road. Pursuant to LC15.070 (1), a lot or parcel of land adJo1n1ng a road~deslgnated as a County Road shall have a bU1lding setback 11ne Wh1Ch conforms to the appllcable zon1ng dlstrict. Setbacks shall be measured at right angles to the centerl1ne of a stralght-I1ne or as radials on a curved road to the nearest p01nt of the front wall of the building. Pursuant to LC 15.070 (1) (c) (i) (ff), the mlnlmum rlght-of-way w1dth for development setback purposes based on the functional class of the road shall be 70 feet. Pursuant to LC 15.205 (3), a fac1lity permit 1S requ1red for access serving a new structure on a vacant parcel; or a dwell1ng, lncludlng a manufactured dwell1ng; or 1f speclf1ed as a conditlon of approval in a land d1v1sion or other land use dec1sion. Parcel # 2 shall be subJect to thlS requ1rement. Pursuant to LC15.137 (6), drlveway and road approach spacing on County Roads shall co~ly with the spac1ng standards in LC 15 138 and comply w1th the city's development code w1th regards to block length and connectlvlty pol1cies and standards. A dr1veway for parcel #2 may be provlded on Game Farm Road, but it shall be located at a spaclng of 275 feet from eX1st1ng driveways. The parcels shall prov1de on-slte stormwater management. No drainage shall be permitted from the pr1vate property onto Game Farm Road pursuant to the follow1ng LC Manual. Lane Manual 15.515 - Dra1nage 1. Roads1de d1tches and other dra1nage fac1lltles shall be designed solely to promote dralnage of the County Road wlthout interferlng w1th natural waterways Whenever a road crosses a natural channel or waterway, culverts shall be 1nstalled to maintaln the natural water flow. Such natural waterway shall be 1dent1f1ed by survey of the topography and/or aer1al photography of surrounding terraln. 1i. Water shall not be diverted from a natural channel or otherwlse from private property down a County or public roadslde ditch. Lane Countv recrue~t~ t~~ fG~l0wi~a cond~t~ons of aryoroval as Dart of the tentative oartition aooroval: County faclllty permlts are required to reVlew any new dr1veway approaches and storm drainage works. The following requ1rements shall be met as part of the faclllty permit process. 1 (a) All requlrements of the fac approved as specifled in the is LC 15.200-210. 'ty permits shall be met, const~'cted, lnspected, and ~d facllity permit. Faclllty p~ t requlrements are in (. (b) Per LC 15.138(6), the facillty permlt application shall include a copy of slte plans for new development showlng the locatlon and wldth of access serving the property at the intersection of the property and road rlght-of-way, including all driveways from adjacent properties as necessary to assure conformance with spaclng standards. (c) Standards for private approaches on County Roads, as speclfled In LC 15.139, shall be met in the lssued facillty permlt. (d) The appllcatlon shall include a copy of the approved prellmlnary partition plan and conditlons of approval. Thanks for providing us the opportunlty to comment on the proposal. Please contact 682-6902 or visit httn://www.lanecountv oro/RlohtOfWav for lnformation about facility permlts and associated fees Sbasbi Bajracbarya, P.E. Sr Englneenng ASSOCiate Transportation Planning. Engineering Dlv Lane County PWD, 3040 North Delta Highway Eugene, OR 97408 (541) 682 6932 2 , - DEVELOPMENTSERWCES 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (j1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Jason Goshert SS & W Engineers 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 150 Eugene, OR 97401 Dr. Larry T~ol1";n~" 3-D Professlonal Group LLC 175 B Street Building B Springfield, OR 97477