HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 5/6/2008
. "
MAY - 6 2008
City of Spnngfleld
Development ServIces Department
225 FIfth Street
Spnngfleld, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIMi)inal Submittal
Date Received:
Prospective
Applicant Name: Roy Gray
Company: 8587Skyline Estates. LLC
Address: POBox 117, Walterville, OR 97489
I
Prospective
Applicant's Rep.: MIchael Lane Branch. P.E
Phone: 915-8587
Fax:
Phone: 746-0637
Company:
Address:
I
Branch Engineenng, Inc.
Fax:
745-0389
310 FIfth Street, Spnngfield, OR
Property Owner: Roy Gray
Phone:
Company:
Address:
I
Skylme Estates, LLC
Fax:
PO. Box 117, WaltervtIle, OR 97489
I
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-02/18-02-02-24 ITAX LOT NO(S): 500 and 600/1600 and 1800
Property Address: N/A
Size of Property: Total SIte = 25 64 , Development Area = 56 Acres [:g] Square Feet 0
I
Description of If you are filling In thiS form by hand, please attach your proposalLlescnptlon to thiS application
Proposa I: To create 45 lots adhenng to cluster subdl\ l~lon <;landaI'd"
Existing Use: Vacant
# of Lots/Parcels: 45
Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: 5378
sf Density: 8
dujacre
Prospective sr;g
Applicant:
Signatur '-
Date: S- /( / fL1:r
, r
Print
Case No.: 7. D"J-{j)~ -(JiJJ-t{
<)0
Application Fee: $ 500---
Date: sf (# / () r
" ( I
. Reviewed by: ~ ~~~
Technical Fee: $0
Postage Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: $
I
50ro 00
PROJECT NUMBER: PRS2.~- ()(X)5ft,
Revised 1/1/08 f\1olly Markarian
1 of 3
· ','I ~ J ~
1
Development Issues Meeting,Submittal Requirements Checklist
[gJ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropnate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
[gJ Development Issues Meeting Application Form
[gJ Five (5) Questions - list speCific questIons the applicant would like staff to answer
dunng the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list IS limited to five
questions.
[gJ Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal IS listed below, It IS not necessary to Include all of these Items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as pOSSible
given that the level of Information that Will be denved from the meeting IS commensurate
with the level of detail prOVided In the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to Include additional information on the plan as listed In
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land DIVISIOns - PartitIOns &
SubdIvIsIons - Tentative Plan SubmIttal ReqUIrements or 5.17-120, SIte Plan ReVIew
SubmIttal ReqUIrements.
[gJ Drawn In Ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
[gJ Scale appropnate to the area Involved and suffiCient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
[gJ North arrow
[gJ Date of preparation
[gJ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
[gJ DimenSions (In feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
[gJ Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities, including connection pOints
[g] On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch baSinS, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
~ Area and dimenSions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land DIVISIons
[:gJ ApprOXimate location, number and dimenSions of proposed lots
[:gJ How streets In the proposal area connect With eXisting streets
DIMs Related to SIte Plan ReVIew
o
Proposed and existing bUildings: location, dimenSions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between bUildings, and height
Area and percentage of the site proposed for bUildings, st~~S,E~~~.h~~gyS,
Sidewalks, patIos and other ImpervIous surfaces
Parking and Circulation plan
MAY - 6 2008
o
o
Original Submittal
ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
3 of 3
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541-726-3759 Phone
RECEIPT #:
('" 'of Springfield Official Receipt
L_.elopment Services Department
Public Works Department
3200800000000000276
Date: 05/06/2008
Job/Journal Number Description
ZON2008-00024 CTY Development Issues Mtg
Payments:
Type of Payment
Check
Paid By
BRANCH ENGINEERING
cRecemtl
Item Total:
Check Number AuthOrIzation
Received By Batch Number Number How Received
emm 9015 In Person
Payment Total:
Date Received:
MAY ~ 6 2008
Original Submittal
Page I of I
2:57:57PM
Amount Due
506 00
$506.00
Amount PaId
$506 00
$506.00
5/6/2008
, .,'\ ,,"
'''I
.-.............---"~~~~_. "'
,-,
'I
I
ji
;1
I
:1
II
t.- .,
DEr-~SITY CALCULA,TIONS
" .. _ FOR ,
SKYLINE ESTATES
,,~ ..
I
I
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
Original Submittal
Pl"Jj ~o 07-131
--u!:!""..z:;;--~--~~~~~-=-~ . _.._..._'_~=:'~~_,_~____.~____,_.,._~ _._.~...r=~~=-"'-",==~__.___.w____~_"--l
Springfield, OR
May 5. 2008
Prepared by
BRANCH ENGrNEERI~G
310 F lith Street
Spnng:field, OR 97477
Phone 5~1)746-0637
F2.X ( 41) 7-+6-038Q
~
'\
--
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
This 25 ac. site is located on Tax Map 18-02-02, Tax Lots 600 & 500 and Tax Map 18-
02-02-24, Tax Lots 1600 & 1800 (see attached Fig. 1). The property is vacant and
located within LDR & Hillside Development Overlay zoning. Slopes range from under
15% to over 6P%, the elevations are from 820' to 1180' and the site is mostly wooded.
, ~
.
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
As outlined in Springfield Development Code Sec. 3.3-520, a combination of Option "A"
(Average Slope - Minimum Lot/Parcel Size) and Option "B" (Density Transfer Bonus)
were used to calculate allowable density.
Density cannot exceed 8 units/developable acre. The developable area is 5.6 ac. allowing
a maximum of 45 units (see Fig. 2).
Table used to detenrune allowable number of units within each slope range:
1<15-25%
125%-35%
1>35%
10,000 SFfUnit
20,000 SF/Unit
40,000 SF /Unit
Option "A" portion of the site:
Total area.
15.0 ac.
Slope breakdown:
Slope Range Average Slope
Square
Feet
44,296 SF
303.596 SF
I 306,289 SF
Allowable
Units
4 Units
30 Units
7 Units
41 Units
1<15%
115%-35% 124.7%
> 35% I - I
Total for Option "A" '
Calculation for average slope within 15%-25% slope range:
(O.00229)(contour interval)(total contour lenirth) = Average Slope
(area in acres)
(0.00229)(10)(7550) = 24.7%
(70\
v .~/
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
Originat submittat
..
Option "B" portion of the s.it~:
Total area: 4.1 ac:
Slope Breakdown
Slope Range Average Slope Square
Feet
<15% 0 SF
15%-25% I 9759 SF
25%-35% 35.9% I 67,275 SF
>35% 1103,021 SF
I Bonus Transfer for Option "B" (4x1.2)
Calculation for average slope above 15%:
Allowable Units,
o Units
I
(total 180,055 SF)
4 units
I 4 Units
W.00229)(contour interval)(total contour length) = Average Slope
(area in acres)
(0.00229)(10)(6430) = 35.9%
(4.1 )
Total number of units for Option "A" and Option "B'~
Option "A" = 41 Units
Option "B" = 4 Units
TOTAL = 45 UNITS
(See Fig. 3 for illustration)
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
Original Submittal
2
-
"
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1 "=2000'
0-
Cr)
0-
Cr)
I~
;
i
DAISY ST
-=J BOOT/-! KELLY/
WfYERHAEUSER RD
~ in,l ~
~ I I T/-!URSTON ~
I r Q21' ~)):2/~.
',_ X F ST _0- I
IE ST( _ ~;::::-r l-
I ) l 0: E CT - Cl Cr) -1 Cr) <: 6:
:>. >< - KI-- Q f2:oc::c:
L::i . iiE=f5T ~I~- -- ~ ~~
~ a:i _ t;:; - _" _ _ r-..; :::, ~
g~ -frs~~ 3~
A sr, / ~ A ST 0: 0: I A ST I ~F' ~ ~r t:; ~ ~- - ~'-ST ~ -;
.....""J .jQl ~ ~I .,~126~ ~II I . ~ ,'J. ;;;i.
g ~~f"T~"'~ ..,~ 0- ~ 0..:' A"lli SPRINGRELD
~~ ~~.., ~ ASTER ~ - ~ - - MEMORIAL
~ ,,_ <0 0- - CEMETERY
'as \)~ <0 Cr) -
~ ~~SY
~ ~ ELDERBERRY
1 ~~
r GLACIER
~. Iy~
.....-
er,
r:::: ~
<.f1. .., ~
'rN~@:1 ~"'
~c5
Ci':15:
~~ I-
::S;:,..; Cr)
-
.....
~
~ T/-!URSTON
~ HIGH SCHOOL
<:!:,Q:!
~s
~:::';
......
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
Original Submittal
,
'"
FIGs 1
~
~............_--------._.~_. ...,
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1"=200'
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
Original Submittal
FlGe 2
.-.......-..-....__-....-......._-~- -----.....~---~_......._---
.:. ~~,,,a.,~~_..~.~.,,~,..~,,~~,~
SLOPES
(15%
!
L_
/5% - 25%
25% - 35%
>35%
-""""~~
DENSITY CALCULATION
AND SLOPE MAP
SCALE: 1"=200'
Date Received
MAY -- 6 2008
Original SubmIttal. ..
FIG 0 3
- ~= ~. ~-"'."""""~---""~""'~1- "~~~~~:..-::..~:." .--
Date Received:
Skyline Estates
Development Issues Meetmg (DIM) QuestIOns
May 6. 2008
MAY - 6 2008
Original SU,bmittal
B ack2:round.
The development sIte consists of four tax lots tOlall11g approximately'25:6 acres' Tax Map
18-02-02, Tax Lots 500 & 600; and Map 18-02-02-24. Lots 1600 & 1800. Tax Lots 600
and 1600 front nst Street nem It'S cohvergence WIth JessIca Lane
The CIty Lllmt boundary dIvIdes Tax Lot 500 The proposed subdIvIsIon will be entIrely
WIthl11 the CIty LImIts. The development sIte can be descrIbed as havl11g slopes from
under 15% to over 60% The proposed layout \vas conceIved WIth the overalll11tent to
preserve steep slopes and mal11tam the qualIty aesthetIc charactenstIcs of the HIll"Ide
Development Overlay DIstnct. To achieve this, a cluster subdl\ ISI011 is bel11g proposed
utIhzl11g the hIllSIde transfer method for calculating denSIty
In January 2007. a cluster subdI\'lSIOn applIcatIOn for Sky1l11e Estates was SUbI11ltted to
the CIty The pre-applIcation meetl11g was held on January 12.2007 for the subdIVIsIOn
(CIty FIle # PRE2007-00001/ PRJ2006-00056) The development plan and layout has
changed sIgl1lflcantly trom the prevIOUS TentatIve SubdivIsIOn Plan. Therefore, we are
startl11g anew With the tentatIve subdIVISIon applIcatlon process
.oues tIOns'
Certal11 engl11eenng challenges are present With the development. some of whIch we have
questIOns.
Flre/ Transportatlon-
1 Access to the proposed subdIVIsIon wIll be \, ia a Jomt access easement There
are no publIc roadway Improvements proposed WIth thIS subdIVIsIon -The mam
access and spurs for the subdiVIsIOn WIll be through a Jomt access easement
They \\ III ha\7e, a maximum of 18% grade. The maill acce"s WIll have a total
paved WIdth of 21 feet WIth a five foot \\ Ide SIdewalk (6" thICk). ThIS WIdth
\\ III taper down to 15 feet at the turnaround loop on the southern portion of the
subdIVIsion Both of the spms Wll! have a paved vvldth of 15 feet as well WIth
a 5' WIde curbqde SIdewalk on one SIde of the proposed access for l11te111al
pedestnan cIrculatIOn. All proposed vehicular surfaces WIll meet fire "elucle
load reqUIrements \V'here the roadway WIdth IS less then 20 feet. the SIdewalk
wIll also meet the load reqUIrement. We are proposmg rolled curb as to allow
emelgency \'ehicles to maneuver on SIdewalk If needed. No parkmg WIll be
allO\ved on any of the proposed road\\ ays All parkll1g WIll eIther be
incorporated wlthl11 the reSIdentIal units' archIlectmal deSIgn or 111 paved areas
speCIfIcally designated for parkmg
Ivlul1lclpal water 1" a\ all able from the SUB water mam 011 71 s: Street. In order
to PIO\ Ide adequate water pressure fOl domestic use and fIre protection. J pump
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
\ ~. ~
statIon WIll be mstalled at the base of the subdivIsion ne~Ogh'~t~P~
hydrants wIll be mstalled as needed through out the subdIvISIon. and mmUllum
of 1000 gal/mm of fne flow IS proposed. AdditIOnally. a spnnkler system wIll
be mstaIIed wIthm each dweIImg umt ThIS reqmrement wIll be recorded on the
fmal plat No secondary fIre access IS proposed wIth the subdIVISIOn
Does the FIre Department see a problem with this fIre protectIOn strategy or '
access layout, wIdth and gradmg? Does TransportatIOn have any comments
wIth the access layout?
PublIc vVorks -
2. The eXIstmg drall1age pattem flows in such a \vay that the maJonty of runoff is
dIrected to a ravme SItuated on the northwest portIOn of the development SIte.
Our dram age pro'posalll1tends to emulate the eXlstmg dramage pattem as much
as practIcal There is an eXlstmg roadSIde dItch along 71 st Street. and a 15 Inch
dIameter stormwater m3m stubbed to the bottom of the mentioned ravine 'We
intend to route all rooftop and paved sUlface runoff to the proposed gutters and
mlets wIthll1 the ma111 road of the subdIVISIOn All the runoff WIll then be
conveyed to surface the ground Just west of proposed Lot 1 at the locatI0I1 of
the eXIstmg ravme. Check dams wIll be constructed to slow the velocitIes.
and mImmlze eroSIOn An area dram/ mIet wIll be ll1stalled at the base of the
ravme. which wIll cOlmect to the eXlstmg IS" stormwater ma111m 71st Street.
Does the CIty have comments on thIS dramage strategy?
PublIc Works-
3. There is an eAIstll1g 8" samtary seweI mam that termmates at a cleanout
frontmg Tax Lot 2100 There IS also an eXIstmg 8'" samtary sewer mam that
termll1ates at a manhole frontmg Tax Lot 300 (approxnnately 145 feet we~t of
the site on JeSSIca Dnve) The proposal would-ll1clude extendmg one of these
lmes to the subdIVISIon entrance and constructmg a pubhc sewer serVIce 11l1e
along the proposed main road of the subdIVISIon. All lots WIll be prOVIded WIth
access to CIty samtary serVIces Power, cable TV, and commumcatIons are also
avmlable to the SIte m 71 st Street frontmg the SIte. PublIc UtilIty Easements
WIll be establIshed to faCIlItate access to mamtam all publIc utIlItIes Would
PublIc 'Works comment 011 thIS proposal':>
Plmmmg -
4 We have calculated the denSIty of the subdIVISIOn per 3 3-520B. \vhich states
that a combmatlon of OptIOn '"A" - Average Slope - Mll1l1llUm Lot/Parcel SIze,
and OptIOn "B" - Density Transfer Bones, can be used. Vle used both OptIOn
"A"' and "B" to compute the maxnTIum denSIty or umb pel aCie. Plea<;e see the
attached denSIty calculatIons for detmls The resultll12: denSItv fOl thI<;
01 ~ '-.;
:-.ubdI\ISIOn equated to 45 dweIImg umts for the development area, wl11ch meets
the maXImum denSIty of 8 umts per acre for hIllside development transfer.
Would the CIty Plannmg comment on thIS density evaluatlOn~1
:There are two portions of the total development SIte that the developer would
lIke to sectlon off, apmt from the proposed subdIvIsIOn. SpecifIcally. a fIve
acre portIOn of Tax Lot 500 on the southeast comer of the SIte. and a one acre
portion of Tax Lot 1600 frontmg 71st Street What would be the recommended
process to'achleve thIS m the most tlme effIcIent and streamlIne manner?
Should we partltlon the land pnor to proceedmg WIth this subdIVIsIOn
applIcatIon. 01 could we accomplIsh this separation through the subdIvisIOn
plat?
Planmng -
5. The eXlstmg folIage on the undeveloped SIte can be descnbed as wooded
Trees will only be removed If they are wlthm the access way. cutl fIll areas, or
bUIldmg SIte. All other trees outsIde of the development area WIll remam. We
WIll submIt a Tree Fellmg PermIt applicatIon wIth the TentatIve SubdIVISIon
applIcatIon. We WIll submIt a tree protectIon plan mcorporatmg a procedme
for tree removal WIthm the access way. cutl fill areas, and bUIldmg SItes or
envelopes. Because of the quantIty of trees on the SIte and the grade of the
land, \\ e would lIke to request an exceptIOn to showmg on the tree felll11g plot
plan the locatlon. SIze and ~pecIes of each tree to be Iemoved Instead. we WIll
provIde an estImated amount of trees that WIll be removed 111 each area (access
way. cutlflll, and bUIldl11g envelope) Would Plmillmg respond to tIllS request 7
Date Rece\ved:
MAY - 6 2008
Original submittal-
LAFLEUR Karen
Subject:
Location:
ZON2008-00024 Development Issues Meeting (Skyline Estates) Mark Metzger
_SP _ConfRm616
Thu 6/5/2008 1 30 PM
Thu 6/5/2008 2 30 PM
c
Start:
End:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Meeting organizer
Required Attendees:
LAFLEUR Karen, METZGER Mark; Englneenng Group (DIMs), MCKENNEY Gary; GORDON
Gilbert, MCKEE Bart (SUB)
_SP _ConfRm616
Resources:
A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, June 5, 2008 @ 1 30 - 230 P m In DSD 616 The
planner assigned to this application is Mark Metzger The applicant submitted plans to discuss creating a 45-lot cluster
subdiVIsIon, to be known as Skyline Estates Please confirm your attendance at this meeting Thanks Karen
Date Received:
MAY - 6 2008
Origin...l Gubmatal
1
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
ZON2008-00024
Skyline Estates
Vacant - So portion of S 71st Street
Date Received:
MAY ~ 6 2008
Original Submittal.
SITE
Map 18-02-02-00
Tax Lot 500, 600
and
18-02-02-24 TL
1600,1800
North
+