Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 5/6/2008 . " MAY - 6 2008 City of Spnngfleld Development ServIces Department 225 FIfth Street Spnngfleld, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIMi)inal Submittal Date Received: Prospective Applicant Name: Roy Gray Company: 8587Skyline Estates. LLC Address: POBox 117, Walterville, OR 97489 I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: MIchael Lane Branch. P.E Phone: 915-8587 Fax: Phone: 746-0637 Company: Address: I Branch Engineenng, Inc. Fax: 745-0389 310 FIfth Street, Spnngfield, OR Property Owner: Roy Gray Phone: Company: Address: I Skylme Estates, LLC Fax: PO. Box 117, WaltervtIle, OR 97489 I ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-02/18-02-02-24 ITAX LOT NO(S): 500 and 600/1600 and 1800 Property Address: N/A Size of Property: Total SIte = 25 64 , Development Area = 56 Acres [:g] Square Feet 0 I Description of If you are filling In thiS form by hand, please attach your proposalLlescnptlon to thiS application Proposa I: To create 45 lots adhenng to cluster subdl\ l~lon <;landaI'd" Existing Use: Vacant # of Lots/Parcels: 45 Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: 5378 sf Density: 8 dujacre Prospective sr;g Applicant: Signatur '- Date: S- /( / fL1:r , r Print Case No.: 7. D"J-{j)~ -(JiJJ-t{ <)0 Application Fee: $ 500--- Date: sf (# / () r " ( I . Reviewed by: ~ ~~~ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ I 50ro 00 PROJECT NUMBER: PRS2.~- ()(X)5ft, Revised 1/1/08 f\1olly Markarian 1 of 3 · ','I ~ J ~ 1 Development Issues Meeting,Submittal Requirements Checklist [gJ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropnate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. [gJ Development Issues Meeting Application Form [gJ Five (5) Questions - list speCific questIons the applicant would like staff to answer dunng the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list IS limited to five questions. [gJ Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal IS listed below, It IS not necessary to Include all of these Items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as pOSSible given that the level of Information that Will be denved from the meeting IS commensurate with the level of detail prOVided In the application. Applicants are also encouraged to Include additional information on the plan as listed In the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land DIVISIOns - PartitIOns & SubdIvIsIons - Tentative Plan SubmIttal ReqUIrements or 5.17-120, SIte Plan ReVIew SubmIttal ReqUIrements. [gJ Drawn In Ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" [gJ Scale appropnate to the area Involved and suffiCient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' [gJ North arrow [gJ Date of preparation [gJ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number [gJ DimenSions (In feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area [gJ Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities, including connection pOints [g] On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch baSinS, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ~ Area and dimenSions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land DIVISIons [:gJ ApprOXimate location, number and dimenSions of proposed lots [:gJ How streets In the proposal area connect With eXisting streets DIMs Related to SIte Plan ReVIew o Proposed and existing bUildings: location, dimenSions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between bUildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for bUildings, st~~S,E~~~.h~~gyS, Sidewalks, patIos and other ImpervIous surfaces Parking and Circulation plan MAY - 6 2008 o o Original Submittal ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 3 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone RECEIPT #: ('" 'of Springfield Official Receipt L_.elopment Services Department Public Works Department 3200800000000000276 Date: 05/06/2008 Job/Journal Number Description ZON2008-00024 CTY Development Issues Mtg Payments: Type of Payment Check Paid By BRANCH ENGINEERING cRecemtl Item Total: Check Number AuthOrIzation Received By Batch Number Number How Received emm 9015 In Person Payment Total: Date Received: MAY ~ 6 2008 Original Submittal Page I of I 2:57:57PM Amount Due 506 00 $506.00 Amount PaId $506 00 $506.00 5/6/2008 , .,'\ ,," '''I .-.............---"~~~~_. "' ,-, 'I I ji ;1 I :1 II t.- ., DEr-~SITY CALCULA,TIONS " .. _ FOR , SKYLINE ESTATES ,,~ .. I I Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 Original Submittal Pl"Jj ~o 07-131 --u!:!""..z:;;--~--~~~~~-=-~ . _.._..._'_~=:'~~_,_~____.~____,_.,._~ _._.~...r=~~=-"'-",==~__.___.w____~_"--l Springfield, OR May 5. 2008 Prepared by BRANCH ENGrNEERI~G 310 F lith Street Spnng:field, OR 97477 Phone 5~1)746-0637 F2.X ( 41) 7-+6-038Q ~ '\ -- EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS This 25 ac. site is located on Tax Map 18-02-02, Tax Lots 600 & 500 and Tax Map 18- 02-02-24, Tax Lots 1600 & 1800 (see attached Fig. 1). The property is vacant and located within LDR & Hillside Development Overlay zoning. Slopes range from under 15% to over 6P%, the elevations are from 820' to 1180' and the site is mostly wooded. , ~ . ANALYSIS PROCEDURE As outlined in Springfield Development Code Sec. 3.3-520, a combination of Option "A" (Average Slope - Minimum Lot/Parcel Size) and Option "B" (Density Transfer Bonus) were used to calculate allowable density. Density cannot exceed 8 units/developable acre. The developable area is 5.6 ac. allowing a maximum of 45 units (see Fig. 2). Table used to detenrune allowable number of units within each slope range: 1<15-25% 125%-35% 1>35% 10,000 SFfUnit 20,000 SF/Unit 40,000 SF /Unit Option "A" portion of the site: Total area. 15.0 ac. Slope breakdown: Slope Range Average Slope Square Feet 44,296 SF 303.596 SF I 306,289 SF Allowable Units 4 Units 30 Units 7 Units 41 Units 1<15% 115%-35% 124.7% > 35% I - I Total for Option "A" ' Calculation for average slope within 15%-25% slope range: (O.00229)(contour interval)(total contour lenirth) = Average Slope (area in acres) (0.00229)(10)(7550) = 24.7% (70\ v .~/ Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 Originat submittat .. Option "B" portion of the s.it~: Total area: 4.1 ac: Slope Breakdown Slope Range Average Slope Square Feet <15% 0 SF 15%-25% I 9759 SF 25%-35% 35.9% I 67,275 SF >35% 1103,021 SF I Bonus Transfer for Option "B" (4x1.2) Calculation for average slope above 15%: Allowable Units, o Units I (total 180,055 SF) 4 units I 4 Units W.00229)(contour interval)(total contour length) = Average Slope (area in acres) (0.00229)(10)(6430) = 35.9% (4.1 ) Total number of units for Option "A" and Option "B'~ Option "A" = 41 Units Option "B" = 4 Units TOTAL = 45 UNITS (See Fig. 3 for illustration) Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 Original Submittal 2 - " VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 "=2000' 0- Cr) 0- Cr) I~ ; i DAISY ST -=J BOOT/-! KELLY/ WfYERHAEUSER RD ~ in,l ~ ~ I I T/-!URSTON ~ I r Q21' ~)):2/~. ',_ X F ST _0- I IE ST( _ ~;::::-r l- I ) l 0: E CT - Cl Cr) -1 Cr) <: 6: :>. >< - KI-- Q f2:oc::c: L::i . iiE=f5T ~I~- -- ~ ~~ ~ a:i _ t;:; - _" _ _ r-..; :::, ~ g~ -frs~~ 3~ A sr, / ~ A ST 0: 0: I A ST I ~F' ~ ~r t:; ~ ~- - ~'-ST ~ -; .....""J .jQl ~ ~I .,~126~ ~II I . ~ ,'J. ;;;i. g ~~f"T~"'~ ..,~ 0- ~ 0..:' A"lli SPRINGRELD ~~ ~~.., ~ ASTER ~ - ~ - - MEMORIAL ~ ,,_ <0 0- - CEMETERY 'as \)~ <0 Cr) - ~ ~~SY ~ ~ ELDERBERRY 1 ~~ r GLACIER ~. Iy~ .....- er, r:::: ~ <.f1. .., ~ 'rN~@:1 ~"' ~c5 Ci':15: ~~ I- ::S;:,..; Cr) - ..... ~ ~ T/-!URSTON ~ HIGH SCHOOL <:!:,Q:! ~s ~:::'; ...... Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 Original Submittal , '" FIGs 1 ~ ~............_--------._.~_. ..., DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE: 1"=200' Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 Original Submittal FlGe 2 .-.......-..-....__-....-......._-~- -----.....~---~_......._--- .:. ~~,,,a.,~~_..~.~.,,~,..~,,~~,~ SLOPES (15% ! L_ /5% - 25% 25% - 35% >35% -""""~~ DENSITY CALCULATION AND SLOPE MAP SCALE: 1"=200' Date Received MAY -- 6 2008 Original SubmIttal. .. FIG 0 3 - ~= ~. ~-"'."""""~---""~""'~1- "~~~~~:..-::..~:." .-- Date Received: Skyline Estates Development Issues Meetmg (DIM) QuestIOns May 6. 2008 MAY - 6 2008 Original SU,bmittal B ack2:round. The development sIte consists of four tax lots tOlall11g approximately'25:6 acres' Tax Map 18-02-02, Tax Lots 500 & 600; and Map 18-02-02-24. Lots 1600 & 1800. Tax Lots 600 and 1600 front nst Street nem It'S cohvergence WIth JessIca Lane The CIty Lllmt boundary dIvIdes Tax Lot 500 The proposed subdIvIsIon will be entIrely WIthl11 the CIty LImIts. The development sIte can be descrIbed as havl11g slopes from under 15% to over 60% The proposed layout \vas conceIved WIth the overalll11tent to preserve steep slopes and mal11tam the qualIty aesthetIc charactenstIcs of the HIll"Ide Development Overlay DIstnct. To achieve this, a cluster subdl\ ISI011 is bel11g proposed utIhzl11g the hIllSIde transfer method for calculating denSIty In January 2007. a cluster subdI\'lSIOn applIcatIOn for Sky1l11e Estates was SUbI11ltted to the CIty The pre-applIcation meetl11g was held on January 12.2007 for the subdIVIsIOn (CIty FIle # PRE2007-00001/ PRJ2006-00056) The development plan and layout has changed sIgl1lflcantly trom the prevIOUS TentatIve SubdivIsIOn Plan. Therefore, we are startl11g anew With the tentatIve subdIVISIon applIcatlon process .oues tIOns' Certal11 engl11eenng challenges are present With the development. some of whIch we have questIOns. Flre/ Transportatlon- 1 Access to the proposed subdIVIsIon wIll be \, ia a Jomt access easement There are no publIc roadway Improvements proposed WIth thIS subdIVIsIon -The mam access and spurs for the subdiVIsIOn WIll be through a Jomt access easement They \\ III ha\7e, a maximum of 18% grade. The maill acce"s WIll have a total paved WIdth of 21 feet WIth a five foot \\ Ide SIdewalk (6" thICk). ThIS WIdth \\ III taper down to 15 feet at the turnaround loop on the southern portion of the subdIVIsion Both of the spms Wll! have a paved vvldth of 15 feet as well WIth a 5' WIde curbqde SIdewalk on one SIde of the proposed access for l11te111al pedestnan cIrculatIOn. All proposed vehicular surfaces WIll meet fire "elucle load reqUIrements \V'here the roadway WIdth IS less then 20 feet. the SIdewalk wIll also meet the load reqUIrement. We are proposmg rolled curb as to allow emelgency \'ehicles to maneuver on SIdewalk If needed. No parkmg WIll be allO\ved on any of the proposed road\\ ays All parkll1g WIll eIther be incorporated wlthl11 the reSIdentIal units' archIlectmal deSIgn or 111 paved areas speCIfIcally designated for parkmg Ivlul1lclpal water 1" a\ all able from the SUB water mam 011 71 s: Street. In order to PIO\ Ide adequate water pressure fOl domestic use and fIre protection. J pump Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 \ ~. ~ statIon WIll be mstalled at the base of the subdivIsion ne~Ogh'~t~P~ hydrants wIll be mstalled as needed through out the subdIvISIon. and mmUllum of 1000 gal/mm of fne flow IS proposed. AdditIOnally. a spnnkler system wIll be mstaIIed wIthm each dweIImg umt ThIS reqmrement wIll be recorded on the fmal plat No secondary fIre access IS proposed wIth the subdIVISIOn Does the FIre Department see a problem with this fIre protectIOn strategy or ' access layout, wIdth and gradmg? Does TransportatIOn have any comments wIth the access layout? PublIc vVorks - 2. The eXIstmg drall1age pattem flows in such a \vay that the maJonty of runoff is dIrected to a ravme SItuated on the northwest portIOn of the development SIte. Our dram age pro'posalll1tends to emulate the eXlstmg dramage pattem as much as practIcal There is an eXlstmg roadSIde dItch along 71 st Street. and a 15 Inch dIameter stormwater m3m stubbed to the bottom of the mentioned ravine 'We intend to route all rooftop and paved sUlface runoff to the proposed gutters and mlets wIthll1 the ma111 road of the subdIVISIOn All the runoff WIll then be conveyed to surface the ground Just west of proposed Lot 1 at the locatI0I1 of the eXIstmg ravme. Check dams wIll be constructed to slow the velocitIes. and mImmlze eroSIOn An area dram/ mIet wIll be ll1stalled at the base of the ravme. which wIll cOlmect to the eXlstmg IS" stormwater ma111m 71st Street. Does the CIty have comments on thIS dramage strategy? PublIc Works- 3. There is an eAIstll1g 8" samtary seweI mam that termmates at a cleanout frontmg Tax Lot 2100 There IS also an eXIstmg 8'" samtary sewer mam that termll1ates at a manhole frontmg Tax Lot 300 (approxnnately 145 feet we~t of the site on JeSSIca Dnve) The proposal would-ll1clude extendmg one of these lmes to the subdIVISIon entrance and constructmg a pubhc sewer serVIce 11l1e along the proposed main road of the subdIVISIon. All lots WIll be prOVIded WIth access to CIty samtary serVIces Power, cable TV, and commumcatIons are also avmlable to the SIte m 71 st Street frontmg the SIte. PublIc UtilIty Easements WIll be establIshed to faCIlItate access to mamtam all publIc utIlItIes Would PublIc 'Works comment 011 thIS proposal':> Plmmmg - 4 We have calculated the denSIty of the subdIVISIOn per 3 3-520B. \vhich states that a combmatlon of OptIOn '"A" - Average Slope - Mll1l1llUm Lot/Parcel SIze, and OptIOn "B" - Density Transfer Bones, can be used. Vle used both OptIOn "A"' and "B" to compute the maxnTIum denSIty or umb pel aCie. Plea<;e see the attached denSIty calculatIons for detmls The resultll12: denSItv fOl thI<; 01 ~ '-.; :-.ubdI\ISIOn equated to 45 dweIImg umts for the development area, wl11ch meets the maXImum denSIty of 8 umts per acre for hIllside development transfer. Would the CIty Plannmg comment on thIS density evaluatlOn~1 :There are two portions of the total development SIte that the developer would lIke to sectlon off, apmt from the proposed subdIvIsIOn. SpecifIcally. a fIve acre portIOn of Tax Lot 500 on the southeast comer of the SIte. and a one acre portion of Tax Lot 1600 frontmg 71st Street What would be the recommended process to'achleve thIS m the most tlme effIcIent and streamlIne manner? Should we partltlon the land pnor to proceedmg WIth this subdIVIsIOn applIcatIon. 01 could we accomplIsh this separation through the subdIvisIOn plat? Planmng - 5. The eXlstmg folIage on the undeveloped SIte can be descnbed as wooded Trees will only be removed If they are wlthm the access way. cutl fIll areas, or bUIldmg SIte. All other trees outsIde of the development area WIll remam. We WIll submIt a Tree Fellmg PermIt applicatIon wIth the TentatIve SubdIVISIon applIcatIon. We WIll submIt a tree protectIon plan mcorporatmg a procedme for tree removal WIthm the access way. cutl fill areas, and bUIldmg SItes or envelopes. Because of the quantIty of trees on the SIte and the grade of the land, \\ e would lIke to request an exceptIOn to showmg on the tree felll11g plot plan the locatlon. SIze and ~pecIes of each tree to be Iemoved Instead. we WIll provIde an estImated amount of trees that WIll be removed 111 each area (access way. cutlflll, and bUIldl11g envelope) Would Plmillmg respond to tIllS request 7 Date Rece\ved: MAY - 6 2008 Original submittal- LAFLEUR Karen Subject: Location: ZON2008-00024 Development Issues Meeting (Skyline Estates) Mark Metzger _SP _ConfRm616 Thu 6/5/2008 1 30 PM Thu 6/5/2008 2 30 PM c Start: End: Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Required Attendees: LAFLEUR Karen, METZGER Mark; Englneenng Group (DIMs), MCKENNEY Gary; GORDON Gilbert, MCKEE Bart (SUB) _SP _ConfRm616 Resources: A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, June 5, 2008 @ 1 30 - 230 P m In DSD 616 The planner assigned to this application is Mark Metzger The applicant submitted plans to discuss creating a 45-lot cluster subdiVIsIon, to be known as Skyline Estates Please confirm your attendance at this meeting Thanks Karen Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 Origin...l Gubmatal 1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2008-00024 Skyline Estates Vacant - So portion of S 71st Street Date Received: MAY ~ 6 2008 Original Submittal. SITE Map 18-02-02-00 Tax Lot 500, 600 and 18-02-02-24 TL 1600,1800 North +