HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work APPLICANT 3/5/2006
TYPE II TENTATl\lE LAND DIVISION,
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
"
Project Name: Vaughn/Springfield Habitat for Humanity - Meyer Park Cluster Subdivision
Project Proposal: 12 lot cluster subdivision with propl;ed density of 9 units per acre, avg
lot ~ize 5,276 sq. ft.
Case Number: PRE 2005-00052
Project Address: 4866 Main Street
Assessors Map and Tax lot Number{s): 1702 3241 TL300, 302, 303
Zoning: TL 300 CC, TL 302 and 303 MDR
Associated Applications:
IN ;ijo/J/;'dd ~
~~!Y ~~
Refinement Plan Designation: Mixed Use Area 2 /p /?, A. ~ ~/?E
~ /hi>. If N ~"tlIe$
~ ItJ~ '" $RC /VI,
Application Submittal Deadline: March 2, 2006 ~ ?/1,{ //27 Mt' ~ ~
-cf?r~ /~~
.n /If. ~ ,:r-7.2-~
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Applicable Refinement Plan: East Main
Metro Plan Designation: MDR/Mixed Uses
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: August 12, 2005
POSITION
Project Manager
I Transportation Planninq Enqineer
I Public Works Civil Enqi~eer
I Public Works EIT
I Deputy Fire Marshall
I Community Services Manaqer
REVIEW OF
Land Use Planninq
I Transportation
I Utilities
I Sanitary & Storm Sewer
I Fire and Life Safety
I Buildinq
NAME
Linda Pauly
I Gary McKenney
I
Matt Stouder
Gilbert Gordon
I Dave Puent
PHONE
726-4608
I 726-4585
I
I 736-1035
I 726-2293
I 726-3668
APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Applicant
Teri Vaughn
4866 Main Street
Springfield, OR 97478
Owner
Springfield Habitat for Humanity
4866 Main Street
Springfield, OR 97478
Applicant's Representative
Krvsh and Associates
54''!~enten!)'ifll Loop
Eugene, OR 97401
8/ll/05
TENTATt\)E LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees
o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'/2"x 11"
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
[25J 0 0
8 V2" x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant IS not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
Complete
Incomplete See
Notes
[25J 0
0,
/Y'l
o Tentative Land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
0 [gJ 0
0 [gJ 0
[gJ 0 0
[gJ
o
o
[gJ
o
o
o
l:8J
o
o
I2SJ
o
8/11/05
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
All existing and proposed easements
Dimensions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of each building site
indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Location, widths and names of all existing and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division
Location of existing and required traffic control
devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
Location and width of all existing and proposed
sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways
and bike trails
Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in
any required planter strip
2
D
rg]
D
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate
the proposed connection points
o Phased Development Plan required if redivision is proposed. The plan must include
the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must
progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the
development and accommodating other required public improvements.
Complete
Incomplete See
Notes
o 0
Phased Development Plan
o
Notes:
8/11/05
3
.^
1. Plan submittal Dues not conform with SDC 35.040 ~Jbmittal Requirements. See
Engineering comments regarding plan sheet organization and required professionals.
The dimensions of each existing lot must be shown [SDC 35.040 (f)]. The existing
conditions must be shown in relation to the existing lot configuration, not proposed lots.
Zoning districts of the property and of properties within 100 feet of the subject property
must be shown [SDC 35.040 (g)].
2. Title report must be issued within one month of submittal [SDC 35.040 (6)(e)].
Deed for TL 300 is altered. Deeds required for each property. Please verify correlation
of deeds and tax lots.
3. The ODOT permit applications must be for the current proposal, not for a previous
proposal. Submit supporting documentation.
4. Please describe the purpose of the 80' easement and the joint use access easements
shown on sheet 3, pursuant to SDC 35.040 (9).
5. Cluster Development is permitted in residential zones subject to Special Use
Standards. In accordance with SDC 35.040 (6)(a), the application requires a narrative
addressing Special Use Standards SDC 16.100 (3)(a) through (J) AND a narrative
explaining the purpose of the proposed Subdivision.
6. SDC 35.040 (13) requires the following additional information for cluster subdivision
submittals:
(a) Front yard setbacks for buildings in established residential areas.
(b) Building height transition.
(c) Building orientation and connectivity to the fronting street.
(d) Garage door placement and design.
(e) Percentage of windows and/or dwelling doors on facades of homes facing streets,
sidewalks and multi-use paths.
(f) Design variety. Each home shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following six
building design features. Applicants shall indicate which option they are proposing on
plans: "
1. Roof pitch and design. A minimum of 4 to 12 roof pitch. Eaves.,
2. Eaves with a minimum of 6-inch overhang.
3. Arch itectu ra I featu res.
4. Architectural details. At least one architectural detail on a dwelling fa<;ade that
faces the street. Architectural details used consistently throughout the
construction of the dwelling fa<;ade that face streets. (See SDC 35.040 (13)(f)4.
for details).
(g) Open space location and percentage.
(h) Required landscaping and if required show landscaping for buffer area.
7. A draft of the proposed Homeowners Association CCRs is required and/or a proposal
for stormwater facility maintenance.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
8/] 1105
4
1. TL 302 and 303 are zoned Medium Density Residential. Minimum density in the MDR
zone is 11-20 units per acre. <9 units per acre is proposed.
2. The zoning shown in sheet 2 is incorrect. TL 300 is zoned Cc.
8/11/05
5
P/2~Z()/'S-0005 Z. VAU9H'
""I~.p~ &Ua:r:>lt//~/()}L e/I-z-/O..5
6;. N1CKIE"NNG(
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
.....
o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
1:f,i iii J!I tl) Copy of ROW approach Permit Application
o Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to
analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
B ~ [;g Traffic impact SturN
o Tentative Land Division Plan
liI
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ l1,t)
J0:M
J.:.;.U
Location and type of existing and proposed street
lighting
~
t';::(:'l
L::J
!ii, (y)
Location, widths and names of all existing and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division
fgI
El'..,
.,
, "
ii C")
Location of existirig and required traffic control devices
Notes:
f..AtJtJtI11iaa~ ~~ ...,~ fbr&~6e!JS9.dl.Hnl ~Pdtf8f#.'
In N~C1D ODOT AU4ISSs. ~MlT r:012- 1:>12.\\l6WA Y f,U
~At N .
l ~) "~.'e.~l~'Tl N.9 c.c~"D\. nO NoS t{ ?<-1\'dJ. s~ I .
7121104
(p
jY
TENTATt"E LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
[gj 0 0 Vicinity Map
0 ~ ~ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site
features including bUildings, curb cuts, trees and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed
0 ~ 0 Required setbacks to the proposed new property
lines for existing structures to remain on site
~ 0 0 The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
~ 0 0 The lOO-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA
Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter
of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
~ 0 0 The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of
the Springfield Development Code and delineated on
the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the
Development Services Department
~ 0 0 Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet
above the ground, significant clusters of trees and
shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock
outcroppings
~
o
o
Soil types and water table information as mapped
and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must
be submitted concurrently If the Soils Survey
indicates the proposed development area has
unstable soils and/or a high water table
i
8/12/05
0 Tentative land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
[g] D D Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
D [g] [g] All existing and proposed easements
[g] D [g] Dimensions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of each building site
indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
[8J D D Location and type of existing and proposed street
lighting
[gJ 0 D Location, widths and names of all existing and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division
[g] 0 0 Location of existing and required traffic control
devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
[g] D 0 Location and width of all existing and proposed
sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways
and bike trails
[g] D 0 Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in
any required planter strip
[gJ 0 0 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate
the proposed connection pOints
0 Grading and Paving Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
[g] D D Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer
[g] 0 0 Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
[g] D D Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
0 [g] [gJ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
8/12/05
8'~
L8J 0 ~ The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
EJ L8J r8J Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
~ 0 0 Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Management System Study provide four (4) copies of the study with
the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. (See attached for Stormwater
Scoping Sheet). The plan, calculations and documentation must be consistent with the
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual.
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ 0 [gj
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater
Management System Study
Notes:
8/12/05
tj;v
I. The location of the proposed private Irrevocable Joint-use stormwater, utility and maintenance easement does not
match the locatIon of the proposed stormwater management system shown In the draInage study
2. An apphcatIon for stormwater dIscharge shall be submItted to the Oregon Department of Transportation An
apphcatIOn for a previous development on this property was submItted to ODOT in the past, and was never signed.
However, due to the change in design, a new apphcatIOn will need to be submitted to ODOT for approval
3. The eXIsting house/shed IS shown to encroach into the proposed InfiltratIOn swale, and IS shown to remain on the
eXIsting conditions sheet. There is a 10 foot minunum setback from buildIng footings for water quahty/InfiltratIon
swales. ThIS WIll need to be accommodated for upon plan re-submIttal.
4. Plan sheet 4 depIcts a hammer head turn around in the common area that is not shown on other sheets. The
southerly portIOn of the turn around area IS located in the same place as the north end of the proposed swale.
5. The proposed mfiltratIOn swale is shown to receIve runoff from the jomt use dnveway area serving the cluster lots
Per City reqUIrements, the stormwater will be requITed to be vegetatIvely treated pnor to InfiltratIOn The area of
the joint use drIveway IS relatIvely small, so a sunphfied method for stormwater quahty management can be used
A combination water quality/infiltration swale will probably work best.
6 The proposed unprovement plan shows a 6 mch wastewater line from A Street running along the easterly property
Ime to servIce lot 12. This line wIll need to be placed In a private easement (along WIth other utIlities proposed).
There IS no pnvate easement proposed on the "easement" plan
7. There are no proposed spot elevatIOns or contours shown on the plan set
8 The SIte assessment plan of eXIstIng conditIOns shall only show eXIstIng Information for clanty Please submIt only
one plan sheet of eXIsting condItIons SInce It appears two eXIsting conditions plan sheets were submitted The site
assessment plan shall Include all existing property hnes as currently recorded today Please do not mclude
proposed p' vperty lines on this sheet for clanty
9. It appears that some of the informatIon being shown as eXIsting per recent partItIon applicatIOn, however, SInce this
partItIon IS not platted, all eXIstmg conditions shall be based on what IS currently recorded only ThIS subdiVIsion
apphcatIOn can not be conditIoned on other apphcations bemg finaled or platted. Examples include but are not
lunited to existIng easements (that are not recorded), property lInes, agency approvals from earher apphcatIOns.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
10. An 8 inch storm stub IS shown to service lot 12. The stub runs from lot 12 and enters Into the south end of the
proposed infiltratIOn swale. ThIS Ime will need to be placed m a pnvate easement, and a restriction will be placed
on lot 12 stIpulating that only rooftop runoffwill be allowed to enter this lIne (and Infiltration swale).
8/12/05
\ ~
f
~~ G; ;7~5--COOS2-
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
FIRE
o Tentative Land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ [] LJ
Locatlonr widths and names of all existing and
proposed streetsr alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land dIvision
'ijJ
[],
~L
v@L
[]
Location of existing and required fire hydrants
Notes:
Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application:
UA5rfr;A~M:!4~~1
Ccnt4~ Lb.
I4cce 0'7' ~ W, {9CV (~ ~ _
f!-Sf~-~~d4'
fvo ~ <P71 '
M~A;~~.
4/6/04
//
y
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT
SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable Not
Applicable
~
IU
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's
Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submIttal of a Cluster
Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3)
Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited
Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of
any direct tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high
water table present
Where the development area is within an overlay district
applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay
district
~
rl
L:.J
[J
FIJ
'L:3J
IU
rl
U
IU
IU
D
D
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified in SDC Article 38
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon DiviSion of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland
on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or eVidence the permit application has been
submitted for review
o
IU
IU
rl
U
[g]
[J
Where any grading, filling or excavating IS proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted with the land use application
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified
in SDC Article 10 or 11
r:l
t::..J
r;:-l
~
8/11/05
Iz..
j1
y~~ iJ"/.'
~ ~I ,-trOu ~~/- ~.J-vf/~ .JP"2 /1,/ '" ~ k~
~&~.n- h. ":JL?2- ~ ~~ b /n~/~ ~
H ~lwtfl~ "AJfl/M~ 5''',
.,r //,.dU:4' fr ~ rr.~ '}t?;!' #& 3~3 . rfl-(?v~CJo n
. I ~/tA;U.II/ z,,. ~ ~ J I ip~vd(^
7zffihh"r 5-..)-~d\ ~rtfkh~
;or ~ / ,ltPt:7 '
@--<!t..r- - 71::~ p;-. ~~..e, ; ?1#/h/ /
~)o;.~ /ttt:4i:14/f
,-- --- ~ ~
/t./. //M-<. - hut /Jf #h . / Ar/A ;L 1fpl 3<t't?")
/, ~~ 2. "311:3 J ~_l l IflLv",,/ ~I &tft~ 2
\' ~ ~ ~M4L ~
~ .t"/...w.. - M~/L /'tfIU/I ~' . )
,- .JfK,kut ? .Ail h1/5 . &1~ , 1tZ>/e. l' I1!1-LI CC_Jl~ tt:
L /vfl1t(:r.hV c?- un / ~ .
I
II
i-k, rtf' ~~ ~ wJy ~ v'2r-Zt;7~eJ
III * trnn/ f'h/Pt, -.~ ,./5" ~
/ .' .~c-/i · ~ 3-4--1J~. ~
INf n1L. t-' J'Z/v~ v.-
- . '~~~
r IU{(/t,n c/, kll1~ .
er Jf /(LIf/pn-<<~
/LZllL .m;yf' 111 Mf 5'
/
,
1t/i/ AI!~
_ /U7.~
,t1U- ~tf'~-tfl/t? #$ /4l2:J~~. - il[~~
__?-~N' 7//3 --tf'tf'/l#/ .tJIM,. fif'J/r-'--'-. }
_ ~J!J!.f Z:,tZe'5"":,fir t? ~~ /,M///J ,n."tbttnlf: J/ct~ Nf~~
\ f/1Z,t Z//B-t1't?'C7// //,lIA/;i7"n-- ~
I /-
\ - Jtrv; -$, 2-8~
_ lrJtInIf-lue
~.. /?up~
~?~/. .~~~. L-tf-Z/~~
/lJ"t ~~
JM1!MJ' ~"'? 4--~j~ /#~ ~ ~1z;;' AMUJt:,c /;L~t1d:-.-
,
. e x/rll/141 ~h1/t1/7HtJ h11V
1f1f!7/ ./ fl1tw f;rl' (pis. /
w/~
~UjLLwt
1# /J IUS .
!
.;
II
I
!
-- j
I
~
i
.'
THIS APPLICATION IS:
o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
[g] INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
~I/1t~~
e1ty Planner f/
r.... /2-2e?t?S-
Date
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections
3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a
limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-
day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is
submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must
indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within
seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the
missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing
information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was
submitted for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing Information. If you
refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and
processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-
day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after
the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the
120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the
120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if
the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is
sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects
the application proposal and additional review is required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City within the lSO-day timeline.
Owner/Applicant's Signature
8/11/05
13
)2'