HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Miscellaneous 1987-2-26
,-
.
.
.'
.'
!
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION AND CONSENT
TO ANNEXATION
To: City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
The Petitioner, Charles & Helen Holmes
petitions, consents, and represents as follows:
1. Real Propert~: The undersigned Petitioner(s) owns real property located
outside the ~ity Ilmits, but located within the adopted Urban Growth Boundary
depicted in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, herein referred to
as the Property and more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
2. Irrevocable Petition and Consent to Contiguous Annexation: The
Petitioner(s) hereby ,irrevocably petitions and consents to contlguous annexation of
the, Property to the City of Springfield pursuant to ORS 222.170. Petitioner(s)
petitions, consents and agrees that the City Council in its sole discretion, now or
at any time hereafter, may adopt a resolution initiating contiguous annexation under
ORS 222.170 and ORS 199.490 (2) or any other state statute, a proceeding to annex the
Property to the City. The Petitioner(s) consents to includin9 in such proceeding any
other property the City Council may ,di r'ect or whi ch the owner( s) ha ve pet i t i oned and
consented to the annexation.
Consent
and ORS
Petitioner(s) understands, consents, and a9rees that this Petition and
may be used by the City to meet the requirements of ORS 199.490 (l)(b) & (c)
199.490 (3)(b) & jc).
and
minor
to the
Petitioner(s) also irrevocably authorizes the City to present this Petition
Consent to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission to initiate any
boundary change under ORS 199.490 (1) as an interim measure to provide service
Property prior to its annexation to the City.
In consideration for this Petition and Consent A9reement, the City agrees
that the Petitioner(s) Property may receive municipal services from the City and
Petitioner(s) may undertake the development of the Property in accordance with the
Springfield Development Code and other applicable City plans, policies and standards
and with the requirements of Lane County.
3. Binding on Successors: Petitioner(s) agree that Petitioner(s) and
Petitioner(s) heirs and successors in interest in the Property shall be bound by ,this
Petition for Annexation and Consent to Annexation which shall run with the Property,
and that notice of this document will be recorded by the City in the deeds and
records for Lane County. A copy of the notice has been executed by the petitioner(s)
and is presented herewith to the City. '
4. New Use: Petitioner(s) must obtain City's approval for any new use, change
of use, or intensification of use of the Property. The City will grant approval of
the use if it is in compliance with the Springfield Development Code and other
applicable plans, policies, and standards as ,interpreted by the City.
1 \ ~O
Lo lV\..oV"\J
p,:v..JL-
*
.
.
., '
'.
5. Cost of Service in the Event Annexation Denied: If an administrative
agency or court ot competent Jurisdlctlon determlnes that the Property or part of it
may not be annexed to the City or that the City may provide no service to the
Property or the part, the City may retain all consideration theretofore paid to the
City for serving the Property and may collect in addition thereto whatever additional
considerations are due the City for services the City has provided prior to the
determination that the Property may not be annexed to the City or the City may not
provide services to it.
6. No' limitation on First Amendment RightS: Although this Petition for
Annexation and Consent to Annexatlon is blnding upon Petitioner(s), and may be used
for the purposes for which Petitioner(s) has agreed, nothing herein shall be
construed as limiting or infringing upon Petitioner(s)' right to speak out, comment
upon, or present arguments regarding the advisability of proceeding with the
annexation proceeding. It is specifically understood by Petitioner(s) that in
executing this Agreement, a situation may arise wherein Petitioner(s) may be opposed
to the annexation and would have all rights under the First Amendment to articulate
that opposition but the Petition and Consent of Petitioner(s) as contained herein
will be used for the purposes herein described by City in order to achieve and
demonstrate compliance with ORS 199.490.
7. Provision of Services: In executing this Petition and Consent it is
specifically understood that any annexation shall be contingent in its application to
any particular annexation request upon the annexing City, within a logical and
reasonable time, to provide key urban facilities and services, including, where
applicable, sanitary sewers, solid waste management, water service, fire protection,
police protection, parks and recreation programs, electrical service, land use
controls, communication facilities, public schools on a district-wide basis (in other
words, not necessarily within walking distance of all students served), paved streets
with adequate provision for storm water run-off and pedestrian travel.
the
the
8. Application:
consenting landowner
rest of the City.
DATED this ;U;"i! day of
The City shall not levy assessments, taxes or fees against
not applied to properties of similar character throughout
~.. ' :-r11~~7.
~_ _ vJ.kf::~_~_______
1 loner , , -
.4~.xf~..)
l'et It loner " -
ACCEPTANCE BY CITY:
The City of Springfield hereby accepts Petitioner(s) Petition for Annexation and
Consent to Annexation and by this acceptance acknowledges this as an Agreement
meeting the requirements of lane County Code 10~r1"05 th~gh -55.
_ ~J.<- ~ __ L\l
P I a~i nf atd' Development", rector