HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/24/2008
GREG J, ZARTMAN, P,E,
BRETT C, MARTIN, P.E,
KENT R. INMAN, PlS
M'CHAEL J, BUCKWALD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE REPORT
HILTON GARDEN INN DEVELOPMENT
38-04
Prepared By:
Date Received:
LEI Engineerinm and Surveying
2805 19t St., SE
Salem, Oregon 97302
PH: (503) 399-3828
FAX: (503) 365-1852
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
U
DECADES OF
o ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE
~ PO BOX 25709, 2468 WEST 11TH AVE, STE, B, EUGENE, OR 97402 I (541) 683-8383
~ P.O BOX 13423, 280519TH ST SE, SALEM, OR 97302 I (503) 399.3828
WWW,LEllNC COM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[ . ~~ ~-~r: - _, _~~"_~~ble OfCO:tent.:,_ -. ~ -- :-.. ~]
1
2
3
INTRODUCTION 1
.......................................................................................................................
STORMW A TER SCOPING 1
SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1
3,1 Site Soils 1
..................................................................................................................
3.2 Precipitation........., ..........,.. ........, ......... ................... ....,.......... ............ ...................... 1
3 ,3 Topography............ ....,................ .......' ,......,..,..............,......... ..............., ....... ....... ..... 2
PRE-DEVELOPED 2
4,1 Land Use 2
,...............................................................................................11................
4,2 Hydrological Variables ... ..,........ ..,.................... ........... ..... ....... ................. ....... ........ 2
4.3 Stormwater Basins 2
,PosT-DEVELOPED 3
5,1 Land Use 3
,.................................................11..............................................................
5,2 Hydrological Variables ........... ............. ..,........... ....,...... ........................................,.. 3
5,3 Stormwater Basins 3
J ...................................................................................................
STORMW A TER QUANTITy.....,.. ..'..........".,.. ,....", ..........,....,.. ........,.. ......,..,..,.. ........,...... ........... 4
6,1 Design Variables .............,....,...: .............. ...........,.......,.... ...... ..,....,.......... ................. 4
6.2 Stormwater Conveyance ' 4
.... ...........................................................................................
6.3 1 00 Year Flood Plain 5
................................................................................................
STORMW A TER QUALITY .. ....... .......... ....,.,... ........,................ ..,... ............... ....,...,.... ..,...... ....,.... 5
7 ,1 Water Quality Design Criteria ..,....,....................,.............,..,..........,.............,.......,.. 5
7 .2 Water Quality Design Measures .........................................,.........,........,................. 5
7 .3 Water Quality Basins ........,...................................,.............,....,....,..........,............... 5
7.4 Design Flows 6
............................................................................................................
7 .5 Vegetative Stormwater Quality .....................................................,........................ 6
7,6 Non-Vegetative Stormwater Quality.......,............................................................... 7
CONCLUSION 7
4
5
6
7
8
FIGURES
1
2
Existing Site
Developed Site
/
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original submittal
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
B
C
D
E
F
Stormwater Seoping Sheet
NCRS Soil Data
City Drainage Basin Map
1 00 Year Flood Plain
ODOr IDF Curve for Zone 7
Grassy Swale Curves
APPENDIX
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 INTRODUCTION
This report is the storm water analysis and design for the Hilton Garden Inn Development located
on Lane County Tax Map 17-03-15-33, Tax Lots 1500 and 1600 in the City of Springfield. The
proposed development will replace an existing hotel with a new hotel along with associated
pedestrian facilities, parking areas, landscaping, and other site features, This report addresses
stormwater quantity and quality standards contained in the City of Springfield Engineering
Design Standards,
2 STORMWATERSCOPING
A Stormwater Scoping Sheet was submitted to the City of Springfield and the required
stormwater management scope items were identified by City Staff, A signed copy of the
Stormwater Scoping Sheet is included in Appendix 'A ' of this report,
3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS
3.1 Site Soils
The Lane County Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey was used to
identify soil types and characteristics found throughout the SIte. The site predominately consists
of Co burg Soil with a Hydrologic Group 'c', NRCS Soil Data is included in Appendix 'B' of
this report, The existing site is the location of a demolished hotel with associated paving and
deteriorated landscaping.
3.2 Precipitation
The design storm events used in this analysis are the 2-year and 25-year recurrence intervals and
the City-defined stormwater quality event. All 24-hour rainfall quantities for each event are
analyzed using the NRCS Unit Hydrograph method distributed over a Type IA hyetograph,
Table 3.2.1 lists the 24-Hour Rainfall volumes for each Recurrence Interval.
Table 3.2.1
Recurrence
'Interval (yr)
Water Quality Event
2
25
24-Hour Rainfall
Rainfall (in)
0,83
3,3
4,8
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
P \38(DJ)\38-04\Hydro\Report\5 Dramage Report doc
Page 1 of7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.3 Topography
The existing site is relatively flat with an average longitudinal slope ranging from flat to 2,0%,
The total area of the proposed development is approximately 2,83 acres, The site currently has
drainage outlets to the north onto Game Farm Road, to the east onto Gateway, and to the south
into an existing drainage ditch, As shown on the City of Springfield drainage basin map in
Appendix 'C', the existing drainage system surrounding the subject property all discharges to the
same location west of the proposed development.
4 PRE-DEVELOPED
4.1 Land Use
The entire property is approximately 2.83 acres and consists of a hotel that has recently been
demolished, an asphalt parking lot, hardscape features, and deteriorated landscaping, The
existing impervious area of the site, prior to demolition of the hotel, is approximately 2.68 acres.
Figure 1 shows the existing site outlining the existing drainage sub basins, Table 4.J.1lists the
pre-developed land cover of the existing site,
Table 4.1.1
Land Cover
Landscaped
Asphalt
Concrete
Rooftops
Pool
Area
(acres)
0.153
1.767
0.159
0.680
0.071
4.2 Hydrologic Variables
Hydrologic variables for the Pre-Developed condition used for this analysis are derived from
standard site characteristics as well as site observations, Table 4.2.1 lists the relevant composite
hydrologic variable used in this stormwater analysis for the pre-developed condition,
Table 4.2.1
Use
Pre- Developed
Curve #
94
Mannin~'s 'n'
0,02
4.3 Stormwater Basins
There are three distinct drainage basins on the existing site that all ultimately discharge to the
same City stonnwater system as shown on Figure 1, There were no stonnwater quality or
quantity provisions on the existing site.
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
P:\38(DJ)\38-04\HydroIReport\5 Dramage Report doc
Original &ie1115p;t1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5 PosT-DEVELOPED
5.1 Land Use
The proposed development will create a new Hotel with impervious surfaces in the form of
rooftops, an asphalt parking lot, and concrete and asphalt pedestrian ways as shown on Figure 2,
Landscaping improvements will also be incorporated into the design, Table 5.1.1 below lists the
land cover areas created by this development.
Table 5.1.1
Land Cover
Undisturbed
Landscaped
Asphalt
Concrete
Rooftops
Area
(acres)
o
0.598
1.354
0.086
0.792
The post-developed impervious surface cover is less than the pre-existing condition, Therefore,
stormwater detention is not required for this project.
5.2 Hydrologic Variables
Table 5.2.1 lists the five land cover types and the corresponding Curve Number and Manning's
'n' for the developed conditions, The site has been analyzed using a composite Curve Number
and Manning's 'n' of94 and 0,02 respectively.
Table 5.2.1
Land Cover
Undisturbed
Landscaped
Asphalt
Concrete
Rooftops
Curve #
84
79
98
98
98
Manning's 'n'
0,15
0.24
0.02
0,02
0,02
Other characteristics of the post-developed condition can be found on Figure 2,
5.3 Stormwater Basins
There are fifteen basins in the proposed site shown in Figure 2, As shown on the plans, rooftop
runoff is routed to downspouts and conveyed off site to the north, 67% of runoff from the
parking lot is routed to vegetated swales, with the remaining runoff from the parking lot area
being routed to Gibson dual chamber catch basins,
p, \38(DJ) \38-04 \Hydro \Report\5 Dramage Report doc
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Originctl'~tJ~al
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6 STORMWATERQUANTITY
6.1 Design Variables
Stormwater piping is proposed to be ADS N-12 with a Manning's 'n' value of 0,01. Swales
conform to the City of Portland design standards for vegetated swales and have a design
Manning's 'n' value of 0,24,
6.2 Stormwater Conveyance
The stormwater conveyance system is designed to safely pass the 25-year storm event. Proposed
stormwater piping has been designed to have a minimum, half full, self-cleaning velocity of 3
fps, Water quality swales have been designed with slopes, cross sections, velocities and
freeboard as per the City of Portland Stormwater Management Manual. NRCS unit hydro graph
method was used to calculate the total runoff from each of the proposed basins, shown in Table
6.2.1 below,
Table 6.2.1
Basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I 11
'I 12
I 13
14
15
16
p, 138(DJ)\38-04\HydroIReport\5 Dramage Report doc
Peak Flow (cfs)
0229
0167
0058
0064
0021
0048
0015
0025
0150
0395
0080
0038
0026
0362
0395
0676
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
Page 4 of?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.3 100 Year Flood Plain
The entire site is beyond the 100 year flood plain, The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for
the site is shown in Appendix 'D t.
7 STORMW A TER QUALITY
7.1 Water Quality Design Criteria
The design standard for stormwater quality selected for this project is the City of Portland
Stormwater Management Manual, Grassy swales have been selected to address required
stormwater quality measures for 67% of the proposed parking lot area and Gibson dual chamber
catch basins for the remaining 33%.. Per the stormwater quality design standards, the maximum
storage depth may vary between 6 and 12 inches. The maximum allowable side slope is
4(H):I(V), The minimum flat bottom width is 2 feet for private swales and 4 feet for public
swales, The maximum and minimum longitudinal slopes are 5% and 0,5% respectively, The
maximum slope surrounding the swales is 10%, Swale lengths are determined from charts
provided under Grassy Swales in the Portland Stormwater Management Manual.
7.2 Water Quality Design Measures
Grassy swales have been designed to conform to the standards outlined in the previous section,
Parking lot areas not routed to grassy swales are routed to Gibson dual chamber catch basins,
7.3 Water Quality Basins
Stormwater basins routed to either grassy swales or catch basins are shown on Figure 2, Runoff
length, slope and basin areas are also labeled on this figure,
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
P \38(DJ)\38-04\HydroIReport\5 Dramage Report doc
Page 5 of7
Original Submittal,
NRCS unit hydro graph method was used to calculate design flows for each stormwater quality
facility, Stormwater quality flows are shown in Table 7.4.1 below,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.4
Design Flows
Table 7.4.1
Basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Water Quality
Flow (cfs)
0021
0015
0005
0006
0002
0004
0001
0002
0013
0035
0007
0003
0002
0032
0035
0035
7.5 Vegetative Stormwater Quality
Date Received!:
APR 2 4 2008
Method of
Treatment
Vegetative
Non-Vegetative
Non-Vegetative
Non- Vegetative
N on-Vegetative
Non-Vegetative I
Non-Vegetative I
Non-Vegetative 1
Non-Vegetative I
Vegetative
Non- Vegetative
Non- Vegetative
Non-Vegetative
Vegetative
Vegetative
Non-Vegetative
Design characteristics of runoff from areas routed to the storm water quality swales from each
basin is summarized in Table 7.5.1 below,
Table 7.5.1
Swale
1
2
3
Length
(ft)
100
145
110
Slope
(%)
0.50
0.50-1.50
0,50
Flow (cfs)
Stormwater 25 Year
Quality Event Event
0.032 0,362
0.070 0,790
0.021 0.229
The required length of each swale was derived from Exhibit 2-15 of the City of Portland
Stormwater Management Manual included in Appendix 'F'. All flow rates for the stormwater
P \38(DJ)\38-04\Hydro\Report\5 Dramage Report doc
Page 6 of7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
quality design event, as defined by the City of Springfield, require the minimum length swale of
100 feet.
7.6 Non-Vegetative Stormwater Quality
Design characteristics of runoff from areas routed to Gibson dual chamber catch basins from
each basin is summarized in Table 7.6.1 below.
Table 7.6.1
Catch
Basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
8 CONCLUSION
Stormwater
Quality Event
Flow
( cfs )
0.015
0.068
0.004
0007
0.006
0.001
0,002
0.002
0.013
25 Year Event
Flow
( cfs )
0,167
0.734
0.048
0,080
0,064
0.015
0.025
0,026
0.150
The proposed development provides stormwater conveyance that can safely pass the 25-year
return event and provide stormwater treatment for the City of Springfield water quality event of
0,83 inches per 24-hour period as well as the 2-year storm event. All proposed piping and water
quality swales conform to the City of Springfield standards and the City of Portland Stormwater
Management Manual.
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
P \38(DJ)\38-04\HydroIReport\5 Drainage Report,doc
Page 70f7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
Figures
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HOTEL DEVELOPMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE BASINS
LEGEND
:~.<,.,' ,'J
''\',.... ,\ ,>\'j
DRAINAGE BASIN #2
Date R ceived:
Original S~~~hiL.
~ I
I
0' 80' 160
- -- ~
"\r. -==~--= ~-~
----=.-~- ,..- \ - ~
.---"'" .) .. - \ .. ""
-",,-.--- .--- ~
_M...M...."".,...--, M \\
I
~~
~
~
~~
~
)/ #
~
/
DRAINAGE BASIN DIVISION LINES
~I//,;/
/ / /
/"////;
./ ;I .-
, ,/:" /
1:' '\ \'
\\ \ \ \ \
, \\'
.\\\\\\\
,,\\ ,\
DRAINAGE BASIN #3
DRAINAGE BASIN #1
~
..
!
I EXISTING"
DRAINAGE \
BASIN #1 ~
:i: 0, 50 ACRES;
- ----~--.I
E,JSTlNG DRAINAGE
--BAsIN #2
:i: 1.23 ACRES
......
C/)
~
o
~
ex:
~
~
~
~
IJ
--~) ~ I J
11111 III II! III ~
EXISTING DRAINAGE
BASIN #3
:i: 110 ACRES
, "J
DESIGN
W. KUENZI, EfT
SHEET
LEI ENGINEERING &
SURVEYING DRAWN
A DIVISION OF LOGGING ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC, CHECKED
APPROVED
W. KUENZI, EIT
M. DUMAN, PE
B MARTIN, PE
DWG
DATE
PROJECT
2008
\
~
~
!
~
<Q
FIGURE 1
38-04,DWG
38-04
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE BASINS
..=,;y==~
\ -- --~,
\ '" '\
j
NOTE SEE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR j
PLAN AND PROFILE OF STORM ORAl! GE
SYSTEM
r - --~ ------
~
...
~
Date Received,
APR 2 4 2008
HORIZONTAL
~ I
0' 80'
Original SubrmttaL_________<^ u
DESIGN
W, KUENZI, EIT
W KUENZI, EIT
M DUMAN, PE
B MARTIN, PE
LEI ENGINEERING &
SURVEYING DRAWN
A DIVISION OF LOGGING ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC CHECKED
APPROVED
I
~&
~~
~
~
~
~
~
~
/<<J
~
~
f
~
<0
I
I
160'
SHEET
FIGURE 2
38-04 DWG
DWG
DATE
PROJECT
38-04
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
Appendix A: Stermwater Seeping Sheet
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.
I
I
I
I
~
~
~
I
~
I
I
J9/2006 09:20 FAX 541 736 1021
(r'
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PW
III 002
rt'
pusuc WORKS Ot=PARfMt:.NT I Engineering Division
Fax: (541) 736-1021
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSlfEM SCOPE OF WORK
(AMa beJqw this /1JI.efllld out l1y ApJ Ucrmt)
(f'lease retl1171 to Mail StotJd(JY'@ CIty ofSpri71g/ield Public Works engine ~ng; Fca Ii 736-.J02J. PhoM # 73MOJS),
emazl mstouderniJci.sprin;fie/d. 01, us
Project Name: So,,',"~~e\J. ",\-e\ be""h.,,~Applicant: i~ L. P foJttI, fE:
Assessors Parcel ",..V \.,.o~.IS'1' hots I~ ...I&/Jo._ Date: 3}g JO(P
Land Usc(.s): ,i!bfl!l 'Of'4el".. ,.,.: (CA)_UR\(~1"rtt'i~~hone #: 1(54]) 926-7634
ProjectSize(Acrcs)~ 12,83aeres Fax#: (r;",,':>4J7l.h..i539
Approx,lmperv-iousArea: l,qgcllCye'$ Email: +rll(. t) r4~wes+e.c:.\1Y\
Project .Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): '/ hi!> Pr".j ~~+- '-I i II c.~~~""e ~ "~
kot~\ Aevdopnu::""t. .,."~ eXi::lH....~ S;~ i~ '" ~I)te\ -r"'~+- ~il\ \De de.~u[iS~ed +c
dCC_OMOd~~e c:..o"'S+-Y'weti 0.., 4!>~ 0.. 1A.e..,j \.4o}el. Ike r".pQ5"("cl d~ vel, f H4~",+
~,\\ dec.V"t"o..~ -t-~.e +tl+~1 iWlpe~"'i !)lA.s. ..slAV'.f"'~ G~ ~~ $i+..
I
J..
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge locatlon(s), etc, Attach additional sheet(s) if necess!lJ)':
Tke f...~p~,ord cl~"elor"'e\ot+ \"lJ~l\ 1.t,\-jliU!. e)l.\~t;~j d.\S't.lc4~~ 'oecd',,;Q,~~ t.."
Go.,. ~ ~........... 'it.oc..J,.) G-Cl-.te ~a.'f S *,-ctl Ct."",d (I.... t JI,.,\:S ~-~ j ~,h..'-' ~ 'h..se,cH" +l,,\ 5
~"'Qy-e-V+j ....~ ~.-: 'B<.\-t-wa.'f o....-y-Q,W\? ?\ecl~~ S~'t a.+-\-IL(.\..1.-E'.\ "JC.k;",;~
Je~\;~ ?....ot't>s~.t s:.;"'~ ~~"'-~Q,~'" J.\$(.\"'oCl.'d~ \, ~1lI.-t-i OI",S,
'Pronosed Stormwater Best Maoaf1!eID~t Practices: I--
The site WIll utili7.C underground ..,,,,,..Water quality faCllmes in add.1tion to oil!\''llter separator catch blll\1nJl and some of the
following best ma\lll.,gemcnt practIces from the CIty of Portland StonnwateT Mar ageracnt Manual: lnfiltration Planters, Flow
Through Planters, Vegetated Swales, Grassy Sw.ales, Vegetated Filter Strips, ani, Vegetated Infiltration Basins,
I
, (A1-~--D. below tJds lin.e filled .out In' the CitlI and Returned to tlu! MD&ant'
(At a mininntm, all boxes checked by the Cily 011 th2ftont and 6ack a/this sheet shall be submiued
for (U1 apollcation La be comolete/or submiUa/, although otM, requlreme11ls may be necessarv.)
I
,
Draill~e Study Tvnt fEDSPM Section 4.03,2)~ (Note. VB mav ~ substituted for Rational Method)
o Small Site Study - (use Rational Method for calculations) Ji
D Mid-Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for c leu lations)
Ii Full Drainage Development Study - (use Umt Hychograph Method Ii,r call;ulations)
Environmental Considerations: I
Ii Wellhead Zone. ""'I ~,.. 2- y~ '1 ~ ,riM; ji Hillside Development: rV1'
.. WctlandIRiparlan: fi, 1\ -IF100dWaYIFJOOdPlain: i:;i~
. Soil Type; )i- - ~ U~, OtherJurisdictions--
Downstream Analvsis: ) ~
I} Nt A
o Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
o Design HGl to use for starting water surface elevation:
o Manhole/Junction to take anal)sis to:
uate Received'
Return to Matt Stouder@ Cff:y of Spnngf;a/d. emaif: mstauder@ct.l:~nnafield.or,I,lS, FAX: (541) 73&.-1021
I APR 2 ~ 2008
I
I Original Submittal
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I,
I
Ii
J9/2006 09:20 FAX 541 736 1021
Cl~~ U~ ~YKINGtl~LV YW
I(!JUUJ
.
,
r
r-
ror Ot'/lelJollJse On/}-
fJJ.<
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
'* Based upon 1M information provided 011 the front of thIS SNW. the follow.'ing represents a mlllimum afwhatlS neededfo,. an
application to bll conrpktefar submiltal wi1h 1'rtS~ct to drai~: haweuer, thisli$l should nat be used in lieu of the Spnngfmld
Development Code ($DC) or the CIty s Engineering Design Manual. Compllance'lllleh these requsnm4nJ.S does nol COf/.1lltute site
approval; Addinaruzl siJs $~cdM: irrform(ljion may be nlqulred Nole. Upon scopir,g sheet submiltal, enswe completedfor", }nr been
signed in the ~e provided beluw'
Interim Desl~ SbndardsIWater Quality (EUSI'M Cbaptn 3)
Retr'il NIA
.. D All non-building rooftop (NBR) inlpet"llious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e,g, multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
nlcdia) for slormwlItcr quality, Additionally, a mmimum of 50% of the NSR impervious surl8cc shall be treated by
vegetated methods
II 0 Wherc ~quired, veget-ative stormwater design shall be conSIStent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section :;,02), st=t
forth b}' the BurCiu of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS),
o 11 For new NfJR imperviOllS area less than 15,000 square feet. a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by
the BES for vegetative treatment.
, 0 rf a smrmwater treatment s~le is proposed, submit calc.ulations/speeiflCations for si2Jng, velocity. flow, side slopes, bottom
slope. and ~ mlX consistent WIth either 6ES or CWS requirements, .
. ] Water Quality calculatlon.q as required in S~ion 3 03,) of tbe EDSPM'
o Ii All building rooftop mounted equipment, Or other fluid contaIning ~uipment loctlted outside of the building, shall
bt; provided with ~"'eol'ld8l)' containrnont Of' woathcr reslGtMt enclosure,
General Study R.equlrementB (E...~t ,d $ec:tioa 4.03)
~ 0 Druinage :rtudy prepared by a proressional Civil Engineer licensed in the stale of OregOl:l,
o A completl: dl1l1nage study, 11$ required In EDSPM SectIon 4.03,1. including a hydrological Study map,
o Calculations showmg system capacity for a 2-year stDrm event and ovefflow effccts of a 2S-year stomJ evcnt.
liThe time of concentratton (Tc) smll be determined using a 10 nunute start time for developed basins,
Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4,03.4,q
o 1M A downstteam drni11age analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4,03 4 C, On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSe)
o jj.BlcvatiOll$ of me HGL and flow Jines for both city and private systems where applicable.
Design orstonn Systans (EDSPM Section 4.04) :
fjj. ] Flow lines, slopes, ritu c1CVl1tions, pipe type mid SIzeS clearly mdiclltod ~n the l'lml sct.
o .. Msnimwn pi~ cover shall be I B Inches for reinfofCed pipe and '36 Il'lches for plain conctete and plastic pipe materials. or
proper enzin=ing calculation~ ~hall be provided when less. The covet shall be sufficicnt to support an 80,000 Ib load
without failW'e of the pipe stracttlTc.
o .Manning's "TI" values F()t pipes shall bc consistent with Table 4-1 oftbe BOSP, All StOrm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity ofthrcc (3) feet per second at 0,5 pipe full'based 01'1 Table 4.1.as well,
Other/Misc
Ii 0 Existwg and proposed contours. located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains
. 0 Pnvatc stQ1'mwater casements shall be clearly depicted on Itlans when private storm water flows from one property to
another
o ." Drywells ~hall not rccc:ive runoff from any surfl1Ce w/o being treated by one or morc BMPs, with tb~ exception of residential
building roofs {EDSP Section 3.03.4,A), Additional provisions apply to this as rcquire.c:l by tbe DEQ. R.cfcr 10 the wcbsitc,
www dea.,saue,-oT uslWt'l/~l'i2lOI'dwalulchome.hcm for more Ulfonnation,
o ~ention ponds sh~l1 bc dcslgned 10 limit runoff'ro pre--devclopmcDt rates for the 2 through 2S~year storm events
"'This/onn l/tcUI ~ included (l$ IUI artacllml!'fl4 i1L~ide the jrOlff c;o~u. of tl,e sto- ...",..1Lr IStlldy
* IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW ANfJ SIGNt
AS the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items ere
complete and included with the submitted stonnwater stud)' and plan set
Sign~ J-
V
(
Date Received:
Date-S-Izy/dc.
Form VersioD 2; March 2004
APR 2 4 2008
Original submittal
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original submittal
Appendix 8: NRCS Soil Data
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
SOIL SURVEY OF LANE COUNTY AREA, OREGON
APft12 4 2008
Meters
200
- -
o 50 100
o 200 400
800
1,200
Feet
1,600
(.rf<<t~3mmtal
3/ I 0/2006
Page 1 00
-
-
-
0
-.
ra:
~ 0
~
en )> I.\)
.....
c " CD
CT ::::c
3 ....., ;0
;:;: CD
6) .. 0
....., CD
(::)
(::) <
co CD
Q.
USDA Natural Resources
Iiiii ConservatloB Semce
-
-
- -
MAP LEGEND
.
SOIl Map Units
CItIes
DetaIled Counties
. Interstate Highways
Roads
Ralls
oC
~ Water
Hydrography
Oceans
-
- -
-
-
- -
-----
SOIL SURVEY OF LANE COUNTY AREA, OREGON
MAP INFORMATION
Source of Map Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web SOIl Survey URL http Ilwebsollsurvey nrcs usda gov
r
Coordinate System UTM Zone 10
SOIl Survey Area Lane County Area, Oregon
Spatial Version of Data 2
SOil Map Compilation Scale. 1 20000
The orthophoto or other base map on which the sOil lines were complied and
digItIzed probably differs from the background Imagery dIsplayed on these maps
As a result, some minor shifting of map umt boundanes may be eVident
3/10/2006
Page 2 00
I
Sot! Survey of Lane County Area, Oregon
I
I
I
Map Unit Legend Summary
Lane County Area, Oregon
Map Umt Symbol Map Umt Name Acres III AOI
Percent of AOI
26 Chehahs sIlty clay loam, occasIOnally 18 2
flooded
73
I
I
I
32
Coburg-Urban land complex
795
31 9
75
Malabon sIlty clay loam
490
197
79
McBee sIlty clay loam
57
23
I
96
Newberg loam
28
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
I
APR 2 4 2008
Original SubmIttal
I
USDA Natural Resonrces
'" Conservation Senlce
Web SoIl Survey 1 0
NatIonal CooperatIve SoIl Survey
3/1 O/200t
Page 3 of3
I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Physical Soil Properties
Lane County Area, Oregon
[Entries under "ErOSion Factors-- T" apply to the entire profile Entries under "Wind Erodibility Group" and ''Wind Erodibility Index" apply only to the surface layer Absence of an entry Indicates that
data were not estimated]
Erosion factors Wind Wind
Map symbol MOIst bulk Saturated Available Linear Organic erodl- erodl-
Depth Sand Silt Clay hydraulic water extensl-
and SOil name density conductiVity capacity bllity matter blllty bllity
Kw Kf T group Index
In Pct Pet Pet g/ec mIcro m/see In/In Pet Pct
5
Awbng 0-7 27-30 130-140 400-1400 018-022 30-59 20-50 32 32 3 7 38
7-29 50-60 1 30-1 40 001-042 o 03-0 05 60-89 1 0-2 0 37 37
29-60 27-40 1 30-1 40 1 40-4 00 017-020 30-59 00-1 0 32 32
26
Chehalls 0-13 30-40 1 10-1 30 400-1400 o 19-021 30-59 50-10 24 24 5 7 38
13-55 25-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 017-021 3 0-5 9 20-3 0 28 28
55-70 25-45 1 30-1 50 400-1400 019-021 00-29 00-1 0 32 32
31
Coburg 0-18 27-35 1 20-140 400-1400 018-020 30-59 2 0-6 0 28 28 5 7 38
18-53 35-45 1 20-140 1 40-4 00 018-020 30-59 o 5-2 0 37 37
53-65 15-30 1 20-1 40 1400-42 00 013-015 o 0-2 9 o 0-0 5 24 24
0
~ -.
32 <9.
Cobur~ 0 0-18 27-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 018-020 30-59 20-6 0 28 28 5 7 38
:Jl> m 18-53 35-45 1 20-1 40 1 40-4 00 018-020 30-59 o 5-2 0 37 37
en ......
c: ." ('I) 53-65 15-30 1 20-140 1400-4200 013-015 o 0-2 9 00-0 5 24 24
CT ::::c :::0
3 '"
Urban ~d ..I::- CD
II) 0
fI'o>o,.) CD
75 (::) <
(::)
Malabc n CO CD 0-12 27-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 018-020 30-59 40-60 24 24 5 7 38
a. 12-42 35-45 1 20-1 40 1 40-4 00 018-020 30-59 05-40 28 28
42-60 20-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 018-020 30-59 00-05 32 32
USDA Natural Resources ThiS report shows only the major SOils In each map unIt Others may eXist
~ Conservation Service Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005 Page 1 of 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Physical Soil Properties
Lane County Area, Oregon
Erosion factors Wind Wind
Map symbol MOist bulk Saturated Available Linear Organic erodl- erodl-
Depth Sand Silt Clay hydraulic water extensl-
and sOil name density matter billty blllty
conductivity capacity blllty
Kw Kf T group Index
In Pct Pct Pct glec micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct
76
Malabon 0-12 27-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 018-020 3 0-5 9 40-60 24 24 5 7 38
12-42 35-45 1 20-1 40 1 40-4 00 018-020 3 0-5 9 o 5-4 0 28 28
42-60 20-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 018-020 30-59 00-05 32 32
Urban land 5 8 0
79
McBee 0-24 27-35 1 20-1 40 400-1400 019-021 30-5 9 30-60 28 28 5 7 38
24-41 25-45 1 20-1 40 400-1400 013-021 30-59 o 5-4 0 28 28
41-62 25-45 1 20-1 40 400-1400 013-021 3 0-5 9 o 2-1 0 28 32
95
Newberg 0-14 7-15 1 20-1 40 1400-42 00 012-015 o 0-2 9 2 0-4 0 28 28 3 3 86
14-65 5-15 1 20-1 40 1400-4200 012-015 o 0-2 9 05-1 0 24 28
96
Newberg 0 0-14 7-15 1 20-1 40 14 00-42 00 o 20-0 23 o 0-2 9 20-40 32 32 3 5 56
... 14-65 5-15 1 20-1 40 1400-4200
cO' 012-015 o 0-2 9 05-1 0 24 28
:5 0
119 ~ Q)
Salem en )> -- 0-7 15-20 1 20-1 50 400-1400
C " CD 011-017 o 0-2 9 20-60 20 28 3 6 48
CT ::::0 ;0 7-26 25-35 1 20-1 50 400-1400 o 09-0 17 30-59 1 0-30 20 37
3 ~
;::;. CD 26-60 0-15 1 30-1 60 141 o 03-0 05 o 0-2 9 01-1 0 02 15
6) ~ 0 00-705 00
'" CD
(::) <"
Urban land ~ 5 8 0
CO CD
n.
USDA Natural Resources ThiS report shows only the major solis In each map unit Others may eXlsl
~ Conservation Service Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005 Page 2 of 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Engineering Properties
Lane County Area, Oregon
[Absence of an entry rndlcates that the data were not eslimated]
ClaSSification Fragments Percent passrng sieve number--
Map symbol Depth USDA texture LiqUid PlastiCity
and soli name >10 3-10 limit rndex
Unified AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 40 200
In Pet Pet Pet
5
Awbng 0-7 Silty clay loam CL A-6, 0 0 100 95-100 90-100 85-95 35-45 15-25
A-7
7-29 Clay, Silty clay CH, A-7 0 0 100 90-100 90-100 80-95 55-75 25-45
MH
29-60 Clay loam, Silty clay loam CH, A-7 0 0 100 90-100 90-100 75-95 50-65 20-35
MH
26
Chehalls 0-13 Silty clay loam CL A-7 0 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 40-50 20-30
13-55 Silty clay loam, Slit loam ML A-4, 0 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 35-45 5-15
A-6,
A-7
55-70 Loam, Silty clay, Silt loam CL A-6, 0 0 100 100 90-100 70-90 30-45 10-20
A-7
31
~ CoburgQ 0-18 Silty clay loam CL A-6 0 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 80-95 30-40 10-15
-.
cO" 18-53 Silty clay, Silty clay loam CL A-7 0 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 80-95 40-50 15-25
5" 0 53-65 Clay loam, Frne sandy loam, ML, A-4 0 0 90-100 85-100 70-90 40-65 25-35 NP-10
~ 00 Loam SM
en )> CD
c "
32 0" ::0 :;0
3 ~ 0-18 Silty clay loam CL A-6 0
Coburg;:;: CD 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 80-95 30-40 10-15
..... -=- ~ 18-53 Silty clay, Silty clay loam CL A-7 0 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 80-95 40-50 15-25
Q)
~ 53-65 Clay loam, Fine sandy loam, ML, A-4 0 0 90-100 85-100 70-90 40-65 25-35 NP-10
(::) <"
(::) Loam SM
CO CD
a.
Urban I rnd
USDA Natural Resources
~ Conservation Service
ThiS report shows only the major SOils In each map unit Others may eXist
Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005
Page 1 of 3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Engineering Properties
Lane County Area, Oregon
ClaSSification Fragments Percent passing sieve number--
Map symbol Depth USDA texture liquid Plasticity
and sOil name >10 3-10 limit Index
Umfied AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 40 200
In Pet Pet Pet
75
Malabon 0-12 Silty clay loam ML A-6 0 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 75-95 35-40 10-15
12-42 Silty clay, Silty clay loam CL A-7 0 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 80-95 45-50 20-25
42-60 Clay loam, Loam ML A-4, 0 0 95-100 85-100 70-100 60-80 30-40 5-15
A-6
76
Malabon 0-12 Silty clay loam ML A-6 0 0 95-100 90-100 80-100 75-95 35-40 10-15
12-42 Silty clay, Silty clay loam CL A-7 0 0 95-100 90-100 85-100 80-95 45-50 20-25
42-60 Clay loam, Loam ML A-4, 0 0 95-100 85-100 70-100 60-80 30-40 5-15
A-6
Urban land
79
McBee 0-24 Silty clay loam ML A-6 0 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 35-40 10-15
24-41 Clay loam, Silty clay loam, CL, A-6 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-95 34-40 10-15
0 Silt loam ML
.., 41-62 Gravelly loam, Silty clay, Silt CL, A-6, 0 0 55-100 50-100 50-100 45-95 35-50 10-25
cg' loam GC A-7
::l 0
Q)
95 (J) )> I.\)
......
Newber~ -c CD 0-14 Fine sandy loam SM A-2, 0 0 100 100 60-85 30-50 20-25 NP-5
:::c
3 ....., ;0 A-4
;::+. ~ CD 14-65 Coarse sandy loam, Fine SM A-2, 0 0 75-100 75-100 40-85 25-50 20-25 NP-5
.- 0
Q) sandy loam, Sandy loam A-4
....., CD
(::) <"
c::;)
96 CO CD
Newber!; a. 0-14 Loam ML A-4 0 0 100 100 90-100 65-85 30-35 NP-5
14-65 Coarse sandy loam, Fine SM A-2, 0 0 75-100 75-100 40-85 25-50 20-25 NP-5
sandy loam, Sandy loam A-4
USDA Natural Resources ThiS report shows only the major SOlis In each map umt Others may exist.
~ Conservation Service Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005 Page 2 of 3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Engineering Properties
Lane County Area, Oregon
Map symbol ClaSSification Fragments Percent passing sieve number--
and soli name Depth USDA texture LiqUId PlastlClty
Unified AASHTO >10 3-10 4 limit Index
Inches Inches 10 40 200
In Pct Pct
119 Pct
Salem 0-7 Gravelly slit loam CL-ML, A-4 0 0-5
55-80 50-75 45-75 40-70 25-35 5-10
GC-GM,
GM,
ML
7-26 Gravelly clay loam, Gravelly CL, A-2, 0 0-5 55-80 50-75
40-70 20-65 35-45 10-20
sandy clay loam, Gravelly GM, A-6,
slity clay loam ML, A-7
SM
26-60 Very gravelly loamy sand, GP, A-1 0 10-15 25-55 15-50 10-35
Very gravelly sand, GP-GM, 0-10 0-14 NP
Extremely gravelly sand SP,
SP-SM
Urban land
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Or; .
gmal SUbm;tt I
a _____
USDA Natural Resources
~ . Conservation Service
Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005
This report shows only the major sOils In each map unIt Others may eXist
Page 3 of 3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Water Features
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Lane County Area, Oregon
[Depths of layers are In feet See text for defimtlons of terms used In this table Estimates of the frequency of pondlng and floodmg apply to the whole year rather than to mdlvldual months Absence of
an entry Indicates that the feature IS not a concern or that data were not estimated]
Map symbol
and sOil name
HydrologiC
group
5
Awbng
D
26
Chehalls
B
31
Coburg C
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
USDA Natural Resources
~ Conservation Service
Surface runoff
January
February
March
Apnl
May
November
December
January
February
March
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
November
December
Month
Water table
Upper limit
Ft
o 0-0 9
o 0-0 9
00-09
00-09
00-09
o 0-0 9
00-09
1 5-2 5
1 5-2 5
1 5-2 5
1 5-2 5
1 5-2 5
1 5-2 5
1 5-2 5
Lower limit
Surface depth
Ft
Ft
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005
Pondlrlg
Duralion
Flooding
Frequency
Duration
Frequency
None Bnef Rare
None Brief Rare
None Bnef Rare
None Bnef Rare
None Bnef Rare
None Bnef Rare
None Brief Rare
None Bnef Occasional
None Bnef Occasional
None Bnef OccasIOnal
None Bnef Occasional
None Bnef Occasional
None None
None None
None None
None None
None None
None None
None None
Thrs report shows only the major SOils rn each map unrt Others may eXIst
Page 1 of 3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Water Features
Lane County Area, Oregon
Water table Pondlng Flooding
Map symbol Hydrologic Surface runoff Month
and soil name group Upper limit Lower limit Surface depth Duration Frequency Duration Frequency
Ft Ft Ft
32
~ Coburg C January 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
February 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
March 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
Apnl 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
May 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
November 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
December 1 5-2 5 >60 None None
Urban land 0 Jan-Dec None None
75
Malabon C Jan-Dec None None
76
Malabon C Jan-Dec None None
Urban land 0 Jan-Dec None None
79
McBee C January 20-30 >60 None Bnef Frequent
February 2 0-3 0 >60 None Bnef Frequent
Date Received: March 2 0-3 0 >60 None Bnef Frequent
Apnl 20-30 >60 None None
November 2 0-3 0 >60 None Brief Frequent
APR 2 4 2008 December 20-30 >60 None Bnef Frequent
Original Submittal
USDA Natural Resources
~ Conservation Service
ThiS report shows only the major salls In each map unIt Others may eXIst
Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005
Page 2 of 3
-
-
95
Newberg
96
Newberg
119
Salem
Urban land
-
Map symbol
and soil name
-
-
Hydrologic
group
8
B
8
D
USDA Natural Resources
~ Conservation Service
-
-
Surface runoff
-
Month
January
February
March
December
January
February
March
December
Jan-Dec
Jan-Dec
-
-
-
Water Features
Lane County Area, Oregon
Water table
Upper limit
Lower limit
Ft
Ft
Tabular Data Version 4
Tabular Data Version Date 12/13/2005
-
Surface depth
-
Ft
Pondrng
Duration
-
-
-
Flooding
-
-
-
Frequency
Durabon Frequency
Bnef OccasIonal
Bnef Occasional
Bnef Occasional
Bnef Occasional
Bnef Occasional
Bnef Occasional
Bnef Occasional
Bnef Occasional
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Onginal Submittal.
ThiS report shows only the major sOils .n each map unrt Others may eXist
Page 3 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008 )
Orig.inal Submittal .
Appendix C: City Drainage Basin Map
"" - ""-, ::' (.-:;:/ ,/ - . -~
"-, > ',,'V" / .. , "
\// mil-I. ~08/, __ _ "
.. - -SMH: 016 . Rim 4:3Q:f!' 'OMH 10:7 ~ -
, Rim. -4-30;;8 Deptn \ [) - .. Rim: 431 13' ..
Oep~ I - 5.. Pro; ~t1-_( 75LQQ Depth: 3' .. - ..
Pro r 00-006 '. -1 I~ _ Pro; P30_0Z,1 _00 502 -
~ - ~ ~ ,~ - - OM 102
5Q.3~ t!t _ .. f _ _--_IOl.......... 430 ~2'
- J" '<...V--U'- ", epth 3
703- ~.- - _':'0:." "~FL42?_" " 351 yON 8'" ProF OSP_0291_00
330' 165 -<Dl~ ,.j.., 250 ^.. - - ~ "T
--:"~~?:,":_.--~ --___ 40 CONlO" T~ '353-<.;tT'~AMr.rwhFjl;f-<~~8~D.Fl419.4
.. ~::!."..?-./_-- - y:HD J:lbL -_ -=::~ __ ..
.. .... - ---~ .. - 235'..-- ~ -1L429 5 -';! DMH 1 1 , '",,:'_ 5Q1. ~ .
.. Fl4291..--..-- - ..-- STRIP: .. ~Im..... 43 8 f>"_,, '\~ 'b
- 3 \ - - - :.mI-;::; ..-- ON 8" 2 2 -=-Dept'" , -, _.. ~ '\ _
.. ~ CON ,8" 407 FL4291 C oRAEfil 4)2 ProJ: OSP _ 91_00 ~ ~(;
\ " 9~ '--.._________. 1: ,{: :~.- - ~
~~ - ~
.., .. -' ~ '<"'>0. 1, d - ~~..
'- '" 0467 .. I~ DMH 103 -:.. 0
.. ~12 431 ~5' /
'" c -?
.... r oC
-~ -'- = .. " 7 , ~
--_~ ~~o ..-- .. ~06' - I r
-. ~ "" ~-~-_. --~ ..;S ~ 4: 1; G; i
~ - -70" ~ ~ ,T'" --,
~--_.... ---.0 7~-~..2..-=-" ~O ~~: ..4-:~~~ 1~g"9' __~ /y ~.;..- .. M-'3 !
_0 --T .. 352 {'j;ih v 4" W .. '_ "'<,<:, - SMH _007...;;:>1 I
~ _'-"'::::"~mr~~
c _ u~Jlm--' ,Jr-- \
~.oj:":::OO-:\)OO -
~ 1~
-~
-=-c
.. 5Mb
A f~
1 L - - \ 3520 I Pro.
40~rn ~~' i~~:l~3:'~~ o-_.~-~--_/ - '\ --~' 0~
, ~-'-:~(;)N 12" l' ProF ..OO-~ '" -.- 1', 0 --l
" , / ~ -_,"" J .. - I' __ L~\ 3521 ~
" -' j l' --, -'-_"-~' ""0,, --- (,I;:......, --- 1
. ---~ --------------r '- / -- -"" .. , , ' , '-, ' ff
~========== --ti~ -~-~_,' >:?-?~~ ~ ___,o~~, ~~D8 r 2~ 25(08'
---I. -- -_ '~~~--..-~ - -=====- -- -~ 50' jo" <' ~~grDb~a..oo_..
~ ---- ~ - -, ~ ~- '. - _-----_ ./' Im-~'-=","
- -u~, U~:R~~j\~),~~--~)\ ~,o~ - ~,~' ~~~<1a
//' , 1,) /)) / BELTLINE RD"""") >-'-354 I-'-::~-' ~-'\
//0" . c:....L Ittal y / , / / // / ~ .-----:
/" namal ,,~,...llI.1m , ' , / / I / - . 104 , ..----- ^I /
- " /' 1 ,/ / " 5~6 0 434 pS ~-:- _-=:::::::-<- -:
_n J. I / / 590 / / Depth 0 (~~ ~ .t",
- ;/ 1~' -- ~~ - -~----,=-------- / ~o; 00-000 -f -'6'r--'s-7485
I __ ~ - =-==------- _=________ ,... __ ____ .. ,. ___ __ _ D _~ _ _ ~ =---=
,...---- '1,' ti/' ~.-:::::-:-~._- ..~: 0 --- :::::0.. :",-,~~ 4-3$"7 '-.~/ - \ / -~ --5MH 011 /00 ;Of
' ....---------.., I 0 ------ A4ll..~- .... - -= -"--=', / , " 'I' I Rm~344'
";}//~,!' ~~ ~~:'~~~l~;_-'~-^-'~_-~:\r,,~_/:'_ \,' \'-;~r,,~~g"60oi.
I
) ..-
.-
I
I
1 _ lJS":~
------
----~
-Q:
..._----...........
~, 1
,
---.J
~ "'-'--;1
_ -; .;:0 ~ i
- ,
i
r-
'--
-0-
I
_~ l ._-,~ I
......._~~ '-Ji'=--' "-
r
..'
,-
,', ....---........
._~ ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
Appendix D: 1-00 Year Flood Plain
-
-
\
.J.
o
--1
~~
WI~
O2
::> -
w'o:
LL c..
o if) I
~ (5,
U~
U
I
>-J I
~,'-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ZONE X
LANE COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED AREAS
415591
GAME
~
~
BEL TUNE ROAD
))
-
-
-
-
-
-
'itW~
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
500 0 500
=- I
~ I ~.~ II NAnONAL ~~D INSURANCE PROGRAMI
r I .
I FIRM
i I! FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
"I LANE COUNTY,
OREGON AND
1111, .1 INCORPORATED AREAS
'I I II 'j PANEL 1133 OF 2975
F I' i: (SEE MAP INDEX f:OR PANELS NOT PRINTEO}
I Ii
I :.! II I CONTAINS
I COMMUNfIY
EUGENE OTY Of
SPftINGFlElO CITY OF
LANE COUNTY
I UNI""OAPORA TED AIIEAS ....., 1tl3
II 1,'1
:j~1
ItD
II 11f.8
,I.lIJII.I Federal Emergency Management Agen~
NUMBER PANEL SUfAX
"10t22 1133
410692 1tl3
MAP NUMBER
41039C1133 F
EFFECTIVE DATE:
JUNE 2, 1999
This IS an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map ft
was extracted uSing F-MIT On-Line This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may ha\fe been made subsequent to the date on the
title block For the latest product information about Natlonall=lood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at WNw msc fema gOY
'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original submittal
Appendix E: OOOT IOF Curve for Zone 7
-------------------
r
RAINF ALL INTENSITY - DURA TrON - FREQUENCY CURVES
5.0 -I , ! - :- III '- 1111111:1
I
-.::r:: - 0
4.0 - -- Zone 7 -.
- ra:
I ::J 0
- l>>
3.0 - - - I.\)
- ~ en )>
- ++t+++++H+H-H- .....
- c -0 CD
- -
- - CT :::c ;0
- - ""- 3
~
;:;: CD
~ - ..0- n
2.0 - ~ '" CD
L - -- (::) <"
- -- 1-- (::)
:J - -- co CD
0 - -- .... 0-
J::. - --
" ...... ....
Cf) - --r
CD --I ...
.c. I"
() 1.0 - ~= -I II . II
c
.- 0.9
. -
>- 0.8 - =
-..I I- --~~
-
II) 0.7 - ==~~
=-:
Z - -
w 0.6
I-
z
0.5
.J
.J r 100 Yr.
.:{ 0.4 moot ill ~ ~
1..1... ~ 50 Yr.
Z
-
.:{ - 25 Yr.
0:: 0.3
- 10 Yr.
- --
- -
- -
0.2 - - - 5 Yr.
- -
-
- --
:1' 2 Yr.
_L ~ 4-1+/-1.1--
- --
- -- - w._.
---- - -_.
0.1- -- ro. .
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 too 150 200 300 400
RAINF ALL DURA nON. Minutes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
Appendix F: Grassy Swale Curves
,-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Grassv Swale
Exhibit 2-15 (Sheet 1)
Swale Length at 1.5% Longitudinal Slope
180
I Bottom WIdth = 6'
I
170 I -
I Bottom Width;: 4' ,
I
I
160 . _1- _
- I
CD I
~ 150 I
, . - - - f- -
.r::. I
I
- 140 I
en I - --
C I
CD I
..J 130 I
I
~ Swale Data
ctI 120
3: Side slopes are 4'1
en 110
- - r - - Minimum length IS
I ,
, , 100'
100 , ,
I
I
90 I
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Flow Rate, Q, cfs
---- -- - ---
Date- Received:
APR 2 4 2008
Original Submittal
Stormwater Management Manual
Adopted July 1, 1999; revised September 1, 2004
Page 2-72