HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Miscellaneous 1998-9-3
'';
f
'-
,
.
.
@
Branch Engineering
31 0 5th Street
Springfield. Oregon 97477
(541) 746-0637
Fax [541) 746,0389
9-3-98
Jim Donovan
City of Springfield
225 N. 5th Street
Springfield, Oregon
97477
l7..-tJ 1;' i-A uP-A
)
)
Subject: Northwest Notions project, journal no. 1998-03-0060
Dear Mr. Donovan:
'\
*
We have requested authorization to proceed with that portion
of the structure which encroaches on the public utility easement,
as per our discussions of 9-2-98 and 9-3-98.
The portion of structure in question was required by the City of
Springfield as condition of approval #4.
We may be required to remove that portion of structures that are
in the P.U.E., and to reconstruct those same structures. We
acknowledge and accept such conditions.
~ 1fJ'~
Bill Gerhart, project owner
IJ {j, J:/uk;d- ~ e 1J1. ~ t?o/f
TRANSPORTATION
CIVIL
SURVEYING
/
~
.
To:
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
Site Plan Review Committee
Planner:
:Ii M 0 (y U Ov/M)
journal#: '78 - 0:<' - 06 0 ,A/o/~17ltJ~sr /l/OTlfY-!S
J...A.uf<A r S ' PLA c~
I. Overhead Service [] Underground Servi~
II. Location of nearest electrical connection:
ill. Easement Location and Width
~,~
-~~,~~.,.._'----
_n_________~ ~-=:
'''LTfL\
,.j/')P7/-1u./I.'.S5~-!d)I!.DL!!J' /NS/;.t.iL,U/J(;. A CO;VliuRI!.s.sO~ I j)
I /I
/J/./I)/lJ 77'~ -;;/5@.It;
Comments:
..sug EL~C!f,lc,
ihF',NOi /,!A Id- A PRnl?LE/--1
i.2:'u.1wff..-/ e~j) 7f1,A T br JILL ElJc&nAc.l-l
ALDIUG ;1ItS" No1?Tfl ?/(ofJEIo/ L//J~
nom: Springfield Utility Board - Electric Department
Eng~:::"[echnician: r~
~ -
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
i(;()!' .11.-l!N S"'NhFT, S/)/USGFIE!.D. OREG"ON 97477-fJ054 (503J 726-J3')5 FAX (5t),~U 7J()-:':YY;
I 'ct
66<:C: 9C:L I VS J.d30 ::J I ClJ.::J3i3 8ns 1'~OClcJ
~'~'79~: l I 8f:'3 ~ -130-";;'
~ . .
.
.
DONOVAN Jim
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
DONOVAN Jim
MARX Tom
98-02-53 Northwest Notions Ceramics plant on Laura Street
Thursday, September 03. 1998 5:05PM
TM,
I'm advised that my acoustical protections are encroaching into an easement at north property line at this site,
Please help me meet my goal of acoustically protecting the residential zone to the north by considering these
factors:
1) the pads and block screens are solid, but they' are removable similar to fences, Heavy duty fences, I know, but
the applicant has been advised of his responsibility to remove. if necessary and has verbally obliged, (I could get it
in writing if necessary,)
2} I would not flinch to ask them to remove and reconstruct the screens, but SUB has PUEs up, down, across,
around and through this site and subdivision, We would have options if and when enough utilities are stacked in
there to present a problem, . ,
Let me know if this is an acceptable interpretation of the situation, if you think we need documentation, or if we can
give the go ahead to the contractor for the pour, Or if I have possibly gone round the bend......
JD
3) olLl
-J&
(-
$< )fA/l.--'
vJ/ 6~
f S,-uS
efDrv-R ~fON~<<"""
6AJ
J- 'J- 16'
~
Page 1