The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 4/4/2008 APR - 4 2008 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 Date Received: Development Issues Meeting (OIMi}inal Submittal Prospective Applicant Name: John L. Mason Company: Phone: (541) 602-2447 IFax: Address: 1920 NW 29th Place, Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI Company: Address: Satre Associates, P.c. Phone: (541) 465-4721 Fax: (541) 465-4722 101 East Broadway, SUite 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Alta Mason, Seldon Mason and John L. Mason Phone: (541) 602-2447 Company: Fax: Address: I ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-06-24 1920 NW 29th Place, Corvallis, Oreqon 97330 ITAX LOT NO(S): 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000 Property Address: 3202 Jasper Road Size of Property: Approximately 12.3 acres Acres ~ Square Feet D Description of Proposal: Existing Use: If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application Annexation for Low-Density Residential development Vacant # of Lots/Parcels: 5 I Avg. lAlt/Parcel Size: 107,158 sf Density: 0 / dujacre Prospective Applicant: ~ure- <...) 6hN Print '- Date: 3 - a 6 - () ~ L YV1 A <; d'N Case No.: .3,,",?..>ll' Ii( - ()t;D 2.-1 Date: <1 / -4 ( 0 q" Reviewed by: ~ Application Fee: $ ~e..- vJJ4.\\It'"D . Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 ~ u.JC-y \--e.A f2v' d1~ 9 I~~~~~' ~'~4~'~I:,,!j>9Wr.~- . .~~Z,,~~~~L~~'~rL p~J~~~~'!;'~1~~~'~"~: ijJr) ~b,-: (]x) ~ ~ r - iJ . ~"0 'Z6D S" - 60\:>\ Lf 3 12 r;\ ( A A ~ '2<5trb _ El5b4 'r rIllY Yr--v" J) IV l ) Revised 1/1/~ Markarian 1 of 3 Development Issues Me~ting Submittal Requirements Checklist D Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. I:8J Development Issues Meeting Application Form I:8J Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. I:8J Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It IS not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting IS commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional Information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land DiviSIOns - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. I:8J Drawn in Ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" I:8J Scale appropriate to the area Involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' I:8J North arrow I:8J Date of preparation I:8J Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number [g] Dimensions (In feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area D Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities, including connection points D On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural dralnageways to be retained D Area and dimenSions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions [2J ApprOXimate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots [2J How streets in the proposal area connect with eXisting streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review D Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between bUildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other Impervious surfaces Parking and Circulation plan Date Received: D D APR - 4 2008 ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan Original Submittal ':2 of 3 LAFLEUR Karen Subject: Location: ZON2008-00021 Development Issues Mtg/ Mason - Andy L _SP _ConfRm616 Thu 5/15/2008 2 30 PM Thu 5/15/2008 3:30 PM Start: End: Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Required Attendees: LAFLEUR Karen; lIMBIRD Andrew, MCKENNEY Gary, GORDON Gilbert, MCKEE Bart (SUB); ERNST Dennis, WALKER George, BAJRACHARYA Shashl, GOTTFRIED Charles, Englneenng Group (DIMs); Johnson Tamara (TamaraJ@subutil com), Pat French (patf@wlllamalane.org) _SP _ConfRm616 Resources: A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, May 15, 2008 @2 30 - 330 p m. In DSD 616. The planner assigned to this application IS Andy limblrd The applicant submitted plans to discuss annexing 12.3 acres Into the City of Springfield for future 80-lot SFR SUbdivIsion This will be the third DIM to be held on this development. REF ZON2005-00014; ZON2006-00045. Please confirm your attendance at thiS meeting Thanks. Karen NOTE: Due to the large number of Development Issue Meetings submitted within the last several weeks, it will now be necessary to begin having two meetings per Thursday until we can schedule out within a reasonable time frame. Thanks in advance for your patience. Karen Date Received: APR ... ~ 2008 Original SUbmittal 1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2008-00021 Vacant - S 320d & Jasper Road SITE Map 18-02-06-24 Tax Lot 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900, 4000 North ... Date Received: APR - 4 200S Original Submittal ATTACHMENT 1 IIIlJ!IlJI - SM'KE ASSOCIATES SATRE ASSOCIATES, P.C. Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 101 East Broadway, SUIte 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 465-4721 . Fax (541) 465-4722 . 1-800-662-7094 www satrepc com April 2, 2008 Date Received: City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision APR - 4 2008 ""' . . \)ngll1F-JI ~)ul.)~1\.b;j,; ___,_>._~_ DIM Questions 1. New Rules for the Annexation Process. The applicant applied to annex the subject site in September 2007 (LRP2007-00029) and City staff held a Development Review Committee meeting (October 23rd, 2007), but the city was not able to process the application forward to the Lane County Local Gpvernment Boundary Commission before the commission stopped recelVmg applications at the end of 2007. Previously, the Boundary Commission coordinated with the city to process Extra-territorial Extensions. Under the new rules for the annexation process, what is the mechanism for extra-territorial extension of urban services in Kintzley Avenue? How else will changes to the process affect this annexation? 2. Timely Processing. Considering the applicant submitted the application to annex the subject site (LRP2007 -00029), along with the required application fees, in good faith more than six months ago, and considering nothing about the applicant's submittal caused or resulted in either the delay or the requirement to repeat the entire process, what consideratIOn can the city provide in order to process the applicant's annexation agreement in a timely fashion? Is it possible to process it before processing other annexation applications received after September 28, 20077 3. Annexation Agreement. Many issues affecting the subject site were already discussed among city staff, Springfield Utility Board (SUB) staff, Willamalane Park & RecreatIOn District staff and the applicant and project team. Issues include: · Riparian areas and a portion of Jasper Slough in the property's southwestern comer · Issues regarding urban service extension and Kintzley Avenue · The proximity to the CIty stoITnwater system in Jasper Road, the city's interest in conveying stonnwater from areas east of the subject site via the applicant's property to Jasper Slough, and SUB's attention to the proximity of the Willamette Wellfield. It appears the mmexation agreement process will be complex but will provide opportunities for the parties to reach mutually beneficial agreements. What is the normal scope of an annexation agreement, what issues specific to this site must the annexation agreement address, and how can we move the process forward so city staff can draft the annexation agreement in a timely manner geared toward amicable and fair resolution of issues? City of Sprmgfield DIM Meetmg 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdIvIsIOn - DIM QuestIOns Annl 2. 2008 Page 2 4. Potential System Development Charge (SDC) Credits. Considering the open-space potential of the southwestern portion of the property, the city's interest in conveying stormwater from off-site areas via the applicant's property, and the issues regarding off-site improvements, please review these issues and discuss availability of SDC credits to off-set fees involved with the annexation. 5. Permit process after Annexation Agreement. Please discuss the permit process after the annexation agreement has been signed and confirm the suite of permits required to develop the site as a residential subdivision (as discussed in the written statement and the attached Conceptual Subdivision Plan, Sheet L3). Also, please discuss timing of these submittals under the new annexation process. For example, under the new process, can the applicant apply for tentative subdivision during review of the annexation application? Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original Submittal ~ SAlllE ASSOCIATES Satre AssocIates, P.c. 101 East Broadway SUite 480 Eugene, Oregon 97401 phone 541 465 4721 fax 541 465 4722 1 800 662 7094 www satrepc com April 4, 2008 City of Springfield Development Services Department Planning Division 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Date Received: APR, - 4 2008 Original Submittal Attn: Andy Limbird Re: 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Dear Andy, Enclosed please find Development Issues Meeting (DIM) materials for the 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision project. Included are the application, written statement, list of questions, and plans. The Written Statement contains general project information, a summary of the land use request, information about the site and existing conditions, a brief statement regarding the proposed use, and an outline expressing our understanding of applicable Springfield Development Code articles. The applicant and project team look forward to the Development Issues Meeting. As the Applicant's designated contact, Satre Associates is available to provide supplemental information as needed to facilitate the process. Thank you in advance for your consideration of the application. We look forward to working with you on the project. Ric . Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI President Satre Associates, P.C. Planners, Landscape Architects, and Environmental Specialists , DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING 32nd AND JASPER ANNEXATION AND SUBDIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table of Contents ......................... .................... ............... ............ Written Statement ............................ ...................................... ... No. of Pages 1 1 5 Attachments A. List of Questions 2 Exhibits 1. February 11,2008 Correspondence with City Staff ..................... 1 2. Forwarded Correspondence from City Staff ................................. 2 3. September 5,2006 Correspondence from Springfield Utility Board 1 Plan Sheets L 1. Aerial Photograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 L2. Springfield Data ............ ................................................ ..... 1 L3. Conceptual Subdivision Plan .................................................. 1 Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original Submittal - I8ItIBI ill SAl"KE ASSOCIATES SATRE ASSOCIATES, P.C. Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 101 East Broadway, SUIte 480, Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 465-4721 . Fax (541) 465-4722 . 1-800-662-7094 www satrepc com April 2, 2008 Date Received: APR - 4 2008 City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting 32nd & Jasper Annexation and Subdivision Original SUbmittat I. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION This Development Issues Meeting request is submitted pursuant to the applicant's desire to apply for annexation of property at 32nd and Jasper Roads under the 2008 Oregon Revised Statutes and under the amended Springfield Development Code. The applicant originally submitted an annexation request for the property on September 28, 2007, Springfield Journal Number LRP2007-00029, under the Statutes and Code in place at that time. Subiect Site The subject site consists of five properties identified as Tax Lots 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900 and 4000 of Lane County Assessor's Map 18-02-06-24. The area so defined will be referred to in this application as the subject site. The site is within the Urban Growth Boundary and contiguous to the Springfield City Limits. Size Approximately 12.3 acres. Owner/ Aoolicant The property owner and applicant is John L. Mason. Contact information follows. Aoolication Team Applicant: John L. Mason 1920 NW 29th Place Corvalhs, Oregon 97330 (541) 602-2447 * jlmcvo@gmai1.com Owners: John L. Mason, Alta M. Mason, and Seldon Mason 1920 NW 29th Place Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Attn: John L. Mason (541) 602-2447 * jlmcvo@gmai1.com Development Issues Meetmg 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIon and Subdivision Apnl 2, 2008 Page 2 Planner/ Landscape Architect/ Environmental Specialist and Applicant's Representative: Satre Associates, P.C. Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 101 East Broadway, Suite 480 Eugene, Oregon 97401 Attn: Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA (541) 465-4721 * Fax (541) 465-4722 * r.satre@satrepc.coInQate Received: Civil Engineer/ Traffic Engineer/ Surveyor: Branch Engineering 310 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Attn: Lane Branch, P .E. (541) 746-0637 * Fax (541) 746-0389 * Lane@BranchEngineering.com APR - 4 2008 Original. Submittal II. LAND USE REQUEST This request for a Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is submitted as a pre-requisite to a Type IV Annexation and as an opportunity to clarify issues regarding the contemplated development. The subject site includes approximately 12.3 acres and consists of Tax Lots 3500, 3600, 3701, 3900 and 4000, all on Lane County Assessor's Map 18-02-06-24. The applicant submitted an annexation request September 28, 2007 (annexation application catalogued as Springfield Journal No. LRP2007-00029). Staff now advises (February 11, 2008 communication, attached) that it is necessary to submit a new application and to execute an annexation agreement before the new application. It appears the annexation agreement is the critical path in terms of processing the annexation request in a timely fashion. Therefore, in light of the situation, it is to the applicant's best interest for staff to resume drafting the annexation agreement as soon as possible. Contingent upon approval of the requested annexation, the applicant anticipates developing the subject site as a residential subdivision under the cluster subdivision regulations contained in the Springfield Development Code. Questions for City staff are listed in Attachment A. The remainder of this narrative provides basic information regarding the site and the development contemplated for the site. A list of questions is provided herewith. III. THE SITE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Location The subject site is located south of the intersection of 32nd Street and Jasper Road and west of Kintzley Avenue. Development Issues Meetmg 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdIvIsIOn Apn12,2008 Date Received: Page 3 APR - 4 2008 Lots Affected bv the Prooosed Annexation The following tax lots (listed in Table 1, below) are included in the annexation request. Original Submittal Table 1. Tax Lots and Area Proposed for Annexation I Map Number I 18-02-06-24 I I I I I Total Acreage (approximately) Tax Lot Number 3500 3600 3701 3900 4000 Acreage 0.7 acres 3 7 acres o 86 acres 6.03 acres 1.03 acres 123 acres Ownershio Ownership of the subject tax lots is as follows: . Lots 3500 and 3600 are owned by Alta M. Mason, John L. Mason, and Seldon T. Mason; . Lots 3701 and 3900 are owned by Sheldon Mason and Alta M. Mason; and . Lot 4000 is owned by John L. Mason. Plan Designation. Zoning and Use The adopted Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) Diagram designates the development area as Low-Density Residential and within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The properties are not within the area of any neighborhood refinement plans. All five properties are zoned LDR Low Density Residential on the Springfield Zoning Map and, because they are within the UGB, the UF-lO Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District applies to all five properties. Per Springfield Development Code Section 3.3.810(B)(2), the UF-10 Overlay District shall cease to apply after annexation to the city. All five tax lots are vacant. Tax Lots 3600 and 3900 were previously developed with one single- family residence on each lot. Both structures have been demolished. Context The north side of the subject site abuts Jasper Road with approximately 300 feet of street frontage. Jasper Road is classified as a minor arterial on the Springfield Street Classification Map. Jasper Road is the southern city limit at this point and the subject site is therefore contiguous to the City of Springfield. The east side of the subject site has approximately 490 feet of frontage on Kintzley Avenue, a local access road that is outside the City limits but inside the urban growth boundary. It is the applicant's understanding that Kintzley Avenue is subject to intergovernmental agreements between the City of Springfield and Lane County and is therefore considered to be within the jurisdiction of the City of Springfield. Kintzley Avenue is partly developed with single-family detached homes. The south side of the subject site abuts the urban growth boundary. Properties contiguous to the southwestern side of the site are outside the city limits but inSIde the urban growth boundary and primarily undeveloped. One property contiguous to the northwestern comer of the site is owned by the City, is within the City limits and contains a pond. Development Issues Meetmg 32nd & Jasper AnnexatIon and Subdivision Apnl2, 2008 Date Received: APR - 'I 2008 Page 4 Original Submittal The southwestern corner of the subject site includes a portion of the Jasper Slough. The Local and National Wetlands Inventory Maps for Springfield show this portion ofthe Slough is on the Local Wetlands Inventory but not on the National Wetlands Inventory. It is the applicant's understanding that the site includes areas in the 100-year and 500-year floodplains (FIRM Map 41039Cl161F). In addition, Jasper Slough is shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map as a tributary to a Water Quality Limited Watercourse. Groundwater protection, specifically Time of Travel Wellhead Protection for the Willamette Wellfield, is discussed in the attached List of Questions (Attachment A). Utilities We have obtained existing utility data from the City of Springfield. Plan Sheet L2, submitted herewith, documents utility locations. As shown on Sheet L2 and as indicated by city staff and Springfield Utility Board personnel (please refer to Springfield Journal No.'s ZON2006-00045 and LRP2007-00029), the subject site can be served by the orderly extension of key urban servIces. IV. PROPOSED USE The proposed use after the desired annexation is as a low-density residential subdivision of single-family detached homes using the Cluster Development policies contained in the Springfield Development Code at SDC 3.2.230 and the subdivision standards at SDC Section 5.12.100. V. APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND FINDINGS It is the applicant's understanding that the applicable criteria for the contemplated development include the following sections ofthe Springfield Development Code. Section 5.1-100: Development Approval and Land Use Decision Procedures Section 5.7-100: Annexations Section 3.~.200: Residential Zoning Districts Section 3.3-200: Drinking Water Protection Overlay District Section 3.3-400: FP Floodplain Overlay District Section 5.15.100: Minimum Development Standards Section 5.17.100: Site Plan Review Standards Sectrion 4.1-100/4.2-100/4.3-100: Public and Private Improvements Section 5.12.100: Subdivision Standards Section 5.19.100: Tree Felling Standards Subsequent applications will present findings to address specific relevant criteria of approval contained in each of the listed sections. VI. CONCLUSION Questions for the Development Issues Meeting are included as Attachment A. The applicant requests that representatives from City of Springfield planning, public works, engineering, Development Issues Meetmg 320d & Jasper AnnexatIOn and SubdivIsIOn Apnl 2, 2008 Page 5 transportation, environmental services, and emergency service divisions, staff from Springfield Utility Board water and electrical departments and staff from Willamalane Park and Recreation District be present for the Development Issues Meeting. We are interested in ensuring that the process proceeds smoothly for everyone involved and hope that the information included in this submittal is helpful in that regard. We appreciate any feedback staff has at this time that will help streamline the planning and development processes. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Richard M. Satre at Satre Associates, P.C., via telephone at (541) 465-4721. Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Original Submittal Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT 1 Tim Shinabarger ..---- --~.-8ate-R~eeived: From: L1MBIRD Andrew [alimblrd@cl spnngfield or us] Sent: Monday, February 11,2008 11 31 AM To: Tim Shlnabarger Cc: BENOY Leslie, DONOVAN James Subject: RE LRP2007 -00029 APR - 4 2008 Original Submittal Tim The City IS operating under a new Annexation Ordinance after the recent changeover of responsibility from the Lane County Boundary Commission Because the City IS now processing annexation requests as land use decIsions, all applicants are required to go through a new Development Issues Meeting (DIM) - even If one was held In the past (In this case on October 5, '2006) It IS standard practice to schedule the DIM on a first-come, first-served baSIS upon receipt of a completed application Mr Mason can choose to submit questions similar to the ones addressed In the 2006 DIM, or perhaps reVised questions In light of the new annexation procedure and a change of development Intent (Ie there are no Immediate development plans m the works) At the DIM, staff Will explain the updated annexation procedure, mcludlng new Annexation Agreement proVIsions and application requirements Additionally, fees that would have been paid to the Boundary Commission are now collected by the City so, among other things, a new check Will be required for the reVised annexation application (when It IS submitted) I would note that the annexation fees have not changed so It Will be simply a matter of substituting the Boundary Commission check With a check made out to the City Please let me know If you have any questions Thanks Andy Llmblrd City of Spnngfleld From: Tim Shmabarger [mallto:t.shlnabarger@satrepc.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 9:58 AM To: BENOY Leslie Cc: LIMBIRD Andrew Subject: Spam: LRP2007-00029 Greetmgs, Les & Andy, I'm wntlng With regards to John Mason's application to annex hiS property at 32nd and Jasper Road (Spnngfleld Case No LRP2007-00029), which was submitted September 28,2007, to respectfully request you proceed to initiate a draft Annexation Agreement Your reply regarding the timing for thiS would be most welcome Thank you, Tim Tim Shlnabarger, MCRP Planner II Satre ASSOCiates, P C 101 East Broadway, SUite 480 Eugene, Oregon 97401 Phone 5414654721 Fax 541 4654722 t shmabarger@satrepc com 4/4/2008 EXHIBIT 2 Richard Satre From: Sent: To: Subject: Rob Dehnert Monday, March 24, 2008 5 00 PM Richard Satre, Tim Shlnabarger FW John Mason Annexation Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Purple FYI Date Received: Robln G. Dehnert, AICP Plannlng Manager APR - 4 2008 SATRE ASSOCIATES, P. C. 541.465.4721 Fax 541.465.4721 Original Submittal -----Original Message----- From: John Llvely Sent': Monday, March 24, 2008 3:45 PM To: Rob Dehnert SubJect: FW: John Mason Annexatlon Rob, Here is the informatlon I got back on the John Mason annexatlon request when I asked. John -----Original Message----- From: GRILE Bill [mailto:bgrlle@ci.springfleld.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:16 PM To: John Llvely SubJect: FW: John Mason Annexation -----Original Message----- From: DONOVAN James Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:19 AM To: GRILE Blll SubJect: RE: John Mason Annexatlon Bill, After two rendltlons, changes of ownershlp, applicant delays and bringing Satre ln, the Mason annexatlon team dld not flnlsh an annexatlon agreement wlth PW before the Dec 31st LCBC deadllne and subsequently turned lnto a pumpkln. Seriously, they fell lnto the never never land of startlng under the bc ordlnance and havlng to finish under our new ordinance conslstent wlth ORS 222 (process still under constructlon). The new DIM lS free for those half dozen appllcants caught in the never never land and is deslgned to advlse them of the new process, provide new forms, ask for a new check cut to the Clty (lnstead of the BC, no new fees or increases, just new recipient) and jumpstart thelr AA because it is now a condition of re-submittal When we have the AA and revlsed paperwork we will deem it complete under the new ordlnance and start a 120 and move this to DRC and CC agenda. No apologies necessary here, just responding to a new statute and ordlnance. JD 1 -----Orlginal Message----- From: GRILE Blll Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:07 AM To: DONOVAN James SubJect: FW: John Mason Annexatlon Jlm: Please glve me an update but don't respond to John. Thanks. ... .Bill 2 Date Received: APR - 4 2008 '\. " "" < '3\ ~;"y\ ~r ~ t_ _~<V'_ H_"__ ~/ ~ . .. -~ 1E~-re---rfuff-fE r='\ I . -0 ---'--.----- "'\ ' SEP SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD :.... ~ EXHIBIT 3 I 1:0U6 ~ I I , , _ , II ,ITER <;ER"Ic..E CI:~TEFi 202 South 18th,Street Springfield, OR 97477-S240 lei 541 1'5A16RE ~SSOelA:rESuJi com September 5, 2006 Date Received: Mr. Andy Llmbrrd CIty of Sprmgfield 225 - 5th Street Spnngfield, OR 97477 APR ~ 4 2008 Original Submittal Dear Andy. SUBJECT: ZON#2006-00045 (18-02-06-24 TL 3500,3600,3701,3900,4000) DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 21,2006 DRINKING WATER PROTECTION AREA CONCERNS 32nd & Jasper Road We would hke to submIt the followmg comments for consIderatIOn as development IS pla:rmed for these properl1es Satre and AsSOCIates have noted that the land surface area m the project site IS Wlthm the two-year and five-year tnne-of-travel zones for the Wl11amette Wellfield. Smce storm water from tills SIte Wlll go mto the Jasper Slough, It IS cnhcal to understand that water entenng the slough and Spnngfield M1.1l Race IS dIverted through the Gory Creek Headgates mto the Wlllamette Wellfield TIns water becomes a drrect recharge to the aqUlfer used for the pubhc dnnkmg water supply. Once water from the slough enters the Spnngfield Mill Race, the tIme-of-travel to the wellfield can be a matter of nnnutes rather than years, as the tIme-of-travel zones would mdIcate Storm water management for the project SIte IS cnhcal for dnnlang water protectIOn and Spnngfield Uhhty Board staff Wlll work closely Wlth the CIty of Spnngfield and the developer to protect both surface water and groundwater recharge quality Smcerely, ~~ Charles S. DaVIS Water Quahty Program Manager. : CSD.mkm cc' WIllamette Development SefV1ces, 110 - 3rd Street SE, Albany, OR 97321 John Mason, 1920 NW 29th Place, Corvalhs, OR 97330 Satre ASSOCIates PC" 132 East Broadway, SUlte 536, Eugene, OR 97401 Lane Branch PE, Branch Engmeermg, 310 FIfth Street, Spnngfield, OR 97477 \\svr-data\wscengnr\SITEPLAN\32nd & Jasper SubdlVlSlOn DWP doc 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676 Fax Description UGH Development Issues Mtg s \ Tidemark\forms\casefees l.rpt Fees Associated ~-T,th Case #: ZON2008-~ ~J21 3229 JASPER RD MASON SHELDON & AL TAM Trans Code Revenue Account Number Date Calculated Original Calculated By Amount 4/4/2008 T AJ 0.00 Total Due: 1214 100-00000-425002 I) C~ 10~ ~ ~ DCPL6lJtU-<-J clue- -fn oj yvw ud-uA 0 ; DYL- Date Received: APR - 4 2008 Onginal SubmIttal Page 1 of 1 4/16/2008 7: 18.37AM Amount Due 0.00 $0.00