Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Demolition 2008-4-11 Status Issued 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676 Fax 541-726-3769 Inspection Line SITE ADDRESS: 640 C ST ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 1703352411600 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Building/Combination Permit PERMIT NO: COM2008-00S08 ISSUED: 04/11/2008 APPLIED: 04/11/2008 EXPIRES: 10/11/2008 VALUE: Springfield TYPE OF WORK: Site Work Only PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolish detached garage Owner: TERESA HENSLEY Address: 640 C ST SPRINGFIELD OR 97477 Contractor Type General Contractor OWNER TYPE OF USE: DemolItion Residential Phone Number: 541-687-7295 I CONTRACTOR INFORMATION I I PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS' Storm Sewer Atf&r/cE. Special InstrucmS PEReMIT SHAll EXPIRE fF THE WORK Notes: AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS PERMIT IS NOT COMMENCEn OR Ie;: AO,,^ND~Nr-D ror. ANY 180 DAY PERIOD - I -. I . Valuation Description BUILDING INFORMATION I $ Per Sq Ft or multiplier Square Footage or Bid Amount License Expiration Date Phone Lot Size: Sq Ft 1st Floor: Sq Ft 2nd Floor: Sq Ft Basement: Sq Ft Garage/Carport Sq Ft Other: Occupant Load: # of Units: # of Stories: Primary Occupancy Group: U Height of Structure Secondary Occupancy Group: Type of Heat: Primary Construction Type VB Water Type: Secondary Constr,.\~tf<Lq\l~-rle~~' Oregon law requir~~ 'fiype: # of Bedrooms: follow riJIl::s adopted by the Oreb~~~th: Notification Center. Those rules aSp$OiIfbnltBuilding n/a III :-A'":: :::':.J~ 93~: ~h:-::.:~r ~ ^.~ '::':! ':'~~ 0090. You may obtain COI~DEMEilJJVlRMEJlSJJ INFORMATION I calling the center. (Not : U1~ l~l~pIlUII~ number for the Oregon Utility Notification. F~ontyard SetbaCK: Center is 1_800_332_234D.verlay DISt: SIde 1 Setback: if'Street Trees Rqd: Side 2 Setback: Paved Drive Rqd: Rearyard Setback: % of Lot Coverage: Solar Setbacks: Street Improvements: Description Tvpe of Construction Pal!:e 1 of 2 REQUIRED PARKING Total: Handicapped: Compact: Sidewalk Type: Downspouts/Drains: Value Date Calculated Status Issued CITY OF SPRINGFIELD - Building/Combination Permit PERMIT NO: COM2008-00508 ISSUED: 04/11/2008 APPLIED: 04/11/2008 EXPIRES: 10/11/2008 VALUE: 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676 Fax 541-726-3769 Inspection Line Total Value of Project Fees Paid' Fee Description + 10% Administrative Fee + 12% State Surcharge + 5% Technology Fee Demolition Amount Paid Date Paid Receipt Number $5.00 $6.00 $2.50 $50.00 4/11/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 4/11/08 2200800000000000447 2200800000000000447 2200800000000000447 2200800000000000447 Total Amount Paid $63.50 I Plan Reviews I To Request an inspection call the 24 hour recording at 726-3769. All inspections requested before 7:00 a.m. will be made the same working day, inspections requested after 7:00 a.m. will be made the following work day. I ReQuired InsDections . Demolition: After demolition is complete, sewer is capped or septic is pumped and filled and inspection is requested and approved, and all debris is removed from the site. By signature, I state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that all information hereon is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shall be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Springfield and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY will be made ofany structure without permission of the Community Services Division, Building Safety. I further certify that only contractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.005 will be used on this project. I further agree to ensure that all required inspections are requested at the proper time, that each address is readable from the street, that the permit card is located at the front of the property, and the approved set of plans will remain on the site at all times during construction. \/ ,;;;(~ 1///-0% Owner or Contractors Signature Date Pal!e 2 of 2 225 Fifth Street Spring{iekt, Oregon 97477 541-.:]26-3759 Phone Job/Journal Number COM2008-00508 COM2008-00508 COM2008-00508 COM2008-00508 Payments: Type of Payment CredltCard cRecemtl RECEIPT #: DescriptIOn DemolitIOn + 5% Technology Fee + 12% State Surcharge + 10% Admlntstratlve Fee Paid By TERESA HENSLEY City of Springfield Official Receipt Development Services Department Public Works Department 2200800000000000447 Date: 04/11/2008 Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received dJb 07607C In Person Payment Total: Page 1 of 1 11 :39:00AM Amount Due 5000 250 600 500 $63.50 Amount Paid $63 50 $63.50 4/11/2008 ., SPIIUNGiFIIE'.LD 225 FIFTH STREET. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 . PH:(541)726-3753 . FAX: (541)726-3689 - DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION Address: (pt.{o C- s+- Structure to be Demolished: ~ {)o..v-o...ce... .s Job Number: COt1A7~o~- QOS-6Z The applicant is hereby notified that any redevelopment of the subject site must comply with all of the applicable laws, codes, ordinances, polices and plans in effect at the time the redevelopment proposal is accepted as complete for City review. This would include correction of substandard conditions associated with the present development. Examples of such corrections may include modification of inadequate drainage facilities; compliance with building set- backs from property lines; correction of substandard sidewalks and street improvements, including driveway width and placement; and other corrections which may be necessary to comply with existing development standards. Furthermore, if an existing use is demolished or otherwise removed prior to the development of the proposed use, then the system development charge credit for the previously existing use shall expire two years after the date of issuance of the demolition permit or other removal of the previously existing use. (Springfield Municipal Code 3-416(1)). My signature below indicates that I have read and understand the above conditions relating to the demolition of the above mentioned structure. .Y /,Al~- Signature 1-// of{' Date ATTENTION: Oregon law requires ynu t,o follow rules adopted by tl1e Oregon Ud:::Y Notification Center. Those rules ale set fa, [11 In OAR 952-001-001 0 through O^~185?-CI)1- 0090. You may obtain copies of (118 ~ ;'l~;:, J calling the center. (Note: tl18 ts:srJ:--, - -I' number for the Oregon Uti lilY No~' "c.,? - J-\ Center is 1-800-332-234[f). ;{OTICE: E WORK THIS PERMIT SHALL EXPIRE IF TH J\UTHORIZED UNDER THIS PERMIT IS NOT COMMENCED OR IS ABANDONED FOR ANY 180 DAY PERIOD. SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 . PH:(541)726-3753 . FAX: (541)726-3689 - DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATIONS Your demolition permit is currently being processed. There may be a slight delay, of up to 2 working days for small structures, due to the time required to review the history of the structure to determine if it needs to be documented before demolition. This documentation is for archival purposes only and will not affect the granting of the demolition permit. If the structure is very large or complicated the documentation process may take up to a maximum of 4 working days. Documentation will consist of photographing the building, taking measurements and making scaled drawings. The documentation will be undertaken by the City at no cost to you. Documentation is being done on all structures dated prior to 1940 that may have historic importance to the City's development. THIS DOCUMENTATION WILL NOT IMPEDE THE DEMOLITION PROCESS. An age cut-off of 1940 was chosen because this is the date that the National Parks Service and The Springfield Development Code use to determine potential historic significance. If you would prefer to complete this documentation yourself you must provide the City with the following information: l)~~Pd white photographs of each elevation, a floor plan with measureme 10 ~aT.t~N:~~~\a~~9win8s with w rutes adopted b h ymJ 0 measurements. Notification C y t e Oregoll ~~I : I" in OAR 9'" enter. Those rdles 2:9 ~"" r, Th k.c' o2-001-00iOthrotf:'ih C"'; n , an you lor your patIence. 0090. You may OD' tal'n ~ s .' ,'t J,' '" caplE'S c_ " cal mg the center (i\lr, '" ' , ,\jut_ 1,1C' number for the OJ egnll I_'~ I, Center IS 1-800-J" I grant the City of Springfield permission to enter my property to complete documentation prior to the requested demolition of the structure located at: Address: t.e y 0 c.. 5\- Property Owner Signature:....,.~ /'~~ I p Job Number: g- oos-~g Date: 4-1/~ o~ :'1'171r''=- H. ,. . [\.~ L:;. Tt-IIS J.>l:RMIT SHALL EXPIRE IF THE W~RK AUTHOHIZED UNDER THIS PERMIT IS NOT COMMENCED OR IS ABANDONED FOR ANY 180 DAY PERIOD. ~. mSTORICAL REVIEW APPLICATION, TYPE I MINOR ALTERATIONS: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DEMOLITION , City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 DATE: M~ch 13,2008 File Number: DRC2008-00020 640 'c' Street, Springfield, Oregon Owner and Applicant: Teresa Hensley (Shannon Kellow) 640 C Street Springfield, OR 97477 Type I, mSTORICAL SITE PLAN DECISION: Pending review and approval by the Springfield Historical Commission, on March 11, 2008, staff recommends, as conditioned herein, the applicant's request for demolition of a fire-damaged accessory structure located at the rear of 640 C Street. SITE LOCATION: 640 'c' Street, Springfield, Oregon, Assessor Map 17-03-35-24 Tax Lot 11600, Washburne Historic District, Historic Overlay District. mSTORY OF APPLICATION PROCESS Property owner, Teresa Hensley, contacted staff on May 8, 2007 to discuss the demolition of a fue-damaged garage located on the rear of her property. Staff advised Hensley that there was an application process, which would require both a fee and a minimum of two, independent assessments of the condition of the garage. NATURE OF APPLICATION AND SITE INFORMATION: The applicant has submitted a proposal to demolish a fue-damaged garage because it is 1) structurally unsafe for use, and 2) the cost of repairs exceed both the economic and historical value of the structure. Two contractors have advised the applicant that the cost of the fire repairs; the cost of restoration repairs; and, the cost to put a foundation under the accessory structure, would far exceed 50 percent of the value and replacement costs of the structure. Research of office records by staff did not reveal any specific information pertaining to the garage. There is no 1984 survey information on the structure. The Summer 2003 Property Information up-date survey includes a notation that refers to the garage as an "associated resource c.1924 garage". Staff did not fmd any historical survey records that describe the style or materials used in the garage. No records were found that described the condition of the garage prior to, or after, the 1998 fire damage. The 1998 fue originated next door in the neighbor's garage at 626 'c' Street. The west end of the applicant's structure and the roofwere severely damaged. The roof of the 1 structure has been covered with heavy plastic for the last 10 years and no repairs have been initiated during that time. The structure is beginning to lean off center. Staff photographed the garage on February 12,2008. It is a wooden structure approximately 19' x 25'; there are no windows; there i~ an 8' door that opens onto the alley (north elevation); on the east elevation there is another 8' opening that is boarded up with plywood; there is a door on the south elevation; it is single-story with a gable roof and wood, 4" lap siding. REVIEW DECISION: After review by the Springfield Historical Commission on March 11, 2008, the applicant's request to demolish the garage was approved as conditioned herein. The Commission's March 11,2008 decision is for demolition and disposal of the existing fITe-damaged accessory structure, only; this decision does not extend to construction of a new garage. New construction will require a Type II Historical Site Plan Review. REVIEW PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA mSTORICAL REVIEW. TYPE I Procedural Finding #1: Pursuant to SDC Section 5.1.125, Type I decisions are made by the Director without public notice and without a public hearing; however, SDC Section 3.3-100 states: The regulations of the overlay district shall supplement the regulations of the underlying zoning district. In cases where the regulations conflict, the overlay district regulations shall supersede the underlying zoning district regulations. Staff, as representative of the Director, has made recommendations to the Historical Commission regarding the applicant's proposal and the Commission, pursuant to SDC Section 3.3-915 C 1, has reviewed and approved, as conditioned, the applicant's request. Procedural Finding #2: Pursuant to SDC Section 3.3-905 the purpose of SDC 3.3-900 is to encourage the restoration, preservation, and adaptive use of the City of Springfield's Historic Landmark Structures and Sites. Furthermore, Section 3.3-900 implements the historic policies of the Metro Plan, the Washburne JIistoric Landmark District, Chapter I of the Springfield Code (1965), and OAR Chapter 660. Procedural Finding #3: Pursuant to SDC Section 3.3-910 A, all structures and sites within the Washburne Historic Landmark District are subject to the regulations ofSDC 3.3-900. CRITERIA OF REVIEW AND APPROVAL : Procedural Finding #4: Pursuant to SDC Section 3.3-915 C 1, demolition of an accessory structure shall be reviewed under a Type I procedure. 2 Procedural Finding #5: Pursuant to SDC Section 3.3-915 C 1, on March 7, 2008 the applicant submitted a Type I application as directed by staff, which was presented to the Springfield Historical Commission on March 11, 2008. PROCEDURAL REVIEW CRITERIA FOR DEMOLITION OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE Springfield Development Code Section 3.3-950 Demolition Standards. Criteria (A) through (C) apply to demolition of historic landmark structures within the H-OVERLAY DISTRICT. Review Criteria (A): (SDC Section 3.3-950 A) No demolition permit will be granted for any Historic Landmark site or structure unless the owner has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Historical Commission that one of the following criteria applies: Criteria A-I: The condition of the Historic Landmark Structure constitutes a serious and immediate threat to the safety of the public or occupants, which cannot be eliminated without repairs that would exceed 50 percent of the value of the structure itself. Criteria A-2: The property owner has demonstrated that there would be no reasonable long-term economic benefit from preservation of the Historic Landmark structure. In making this determination, the owner shall demonstrate that all potential uses or adaptive uses for the Historic structure have been thoroughly examined. · Finding #4: After the 1998 fire, the applicant covered the roof of the garage with heavy plastic to prevent further weather damage. In June of 2007 the applicant had the garage inspected by two licensed contractors. Both contractors agreed that due to years of neglect of the c 1924 structure and due to the damage caused by the 1998 fire, the structure was not only a safety hazard, but that repairs would exceed 50 percent of the value of the structure itself The contractors estimated that it would cost approximately $30,000.00 to install a concrete floor, replace the necessary structural members, replace the roof, and scrape and paint the exterior lap siding. Criteria A -1 has been met because the garage has been determined to be unsafe andfire-damage repair costs will exceed 50 percent of the value of the struqture itself · Finding #5: Prior to the fire, it is presumed by staff that the garage was in need of extensive structural repairs due to the deterioration of the roof and interior weather damage. The structure did not originally have a foundation and the ground-contact mud seal members are rotten. Consequently, any preservation and adaptive use of the garage would require a concrete foundation and replacement of 100 percent of the, original structure's mud seals and lower siding. Criteria A-2 has been met because potential uses or adaptive uses require unreasonable economic costs due to extensive replacement of original materials. The end result would be a historic-looking garage reconstructed of all new 3 materials and partially covered with the original 4" lap siding The applicant has an estimate of approximately $24,000.00 to demolish and replace the garage. Review Criteria (B): (SDC Section 3.3-950 B) If a Historic Landmark Site or Structure is permitted to be demolished, the property owner shall provide the Historical Commission with: Criteria B-1: Four sets of measured drawings prepared by a qualified draftsperson showing the primary floor plans and the primary exterior elevation. Criteria B-2: A set of photographs that document the exterior and interior details including significant architectural elements. · Finding #6: The applicant did not submit a measured drawing of the garage; however, she did submit an extensive set of photograph, which documents both the exterior and the interior details of the structure. Staff finds that both the applicant's photographs and the existing photographs that are in the office file are sufficient for historical purposes; therefore, both Criteria B-1 and Criteria B- 2 have been met. Review Criteria (C): The property owner shall also supply the Historical Commission with any artifact or other architectural element as identified by the Commission. The artifact or architectural element shall be carefully removed and delivered to the Commission in good condition to be used in future conservation work. · Finding #7: Criteria C does not apply because there are no artifacts or architectural elements of merit identified within or on the structure. CONCLUSION: The applicant's request for approval to seek a demolition permit to remove a fire- damaged, deteriorating garage from the property at 640 'c' Street is hereby approved because it satisfies the criterion as listed herein. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE NEXT: Prior to any demolition of the garage, the applicant shall discuss the proposal with the Springfield Building Department and determine if a demolition permit is necessary. There is no appeal process for a Type I application; however, if the applicant is dissatisfied with this decision, a Type 2 application may be submitted and reviewed by the Historical Commission a second time. If the Historical Commission reaches the same decision, then the applicant may submit an Appeal to the Planning Commission. If additional information is required please contact Kitti Gale @ 726-3632 or after March 28, 2008, contact Supervisor, Linda Pauly @ 726-4608. 4 ~ 'I 1" " .,... ~::.' -~- .4__j_ _ .~ .< "':"-~..,,,.... .....:-1:........""-. "-\;,J...- ',' .'