HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/04/2005 Regular
.
City of Springfield
Regular Meeting
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
MONDAY APRIL 4, 2005
The City of Springfield council met in regular session in the Council Meeting Room, 225 Fifth
Street, Springfield, Oregon, on Monday, April 4, 2005, at 7:03 p.m., with Mayor Leiken
presiding.
ATTENDANCE
Present were Mayor Leiken and Councilors Lundberg, Fitch, Ballew, Ralston, Woodrow and
Pishioneri. Also present were City Manager Mike Kelly, Assistant City Manager Cynthia
Pappas, City Attorney Joe Leahy, City Recorder Amy Sowa and members of the staff.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Leiken.
SPRINGFIELD UPBEAT
1. Youth Day of Caring.
.
Police Chief Jerry Smith introduced Cassandra Harper, senior at Springfield High School.
Cassandra described the many activities planned for the Springfield Youth Day of Caring
scheduled for April 22. She explained the background ofthe Springfield Youth Day of Caring
and how it had grown since it's creation in 1997. Expenses and the need for adult help were also
increasing. Cassandra encouraged the Mayor and council to look over the forms that were
distributed to them regarding the Springfield Youth Day of Caring. She displayed the t-shirts the
students and adult helpers wear during the Day of Caring. She discussed the many that have
helped the program.
CONSENT CALENDAR
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR WOODROW WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
LUNDBERG TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR WITH ITEM 4.A. REMOVED.
THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
1. Claims
2. Minutes
a. February 22, 2005 - Special Regular Meeting
b. March 7, 2005 - Regular Meeting
3. Resolutions
.
a. RESOLUTION NO. 05-15 - A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT PROJECT P20276 FROM
GRANT'S LANDSCAPING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $69.294.98.
\
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 2
.
b. RESOLUTION NO. 05-16 - A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT PERMIT PROJECT
P30396. CONSTRUCTION OF STREETS. SEWER AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS IN JOHN'S WAY SUBDMSION.
c. RESOLUTION NO. 05-l7 - A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AMENDED CONTRACT WITH KPFF
CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $29.554 FOR ENGINEERING
SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE
STORM WATER SEWER IN THE MARTIN LUTHER KING. JR. P ARKW A Y.
d. RESOLUTION NO. 05-l8 - A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT PERMIT PROJECT
P30414 TEIGEN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. nND STREET.
5. Other Routine Matters
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Ordinances
.
a. ORDINANCE NO. 6122 - AN ORDINANCE CREATING AN OUTDOOR CAFE
PERMIT, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE GRANTING OF SUCH
PERMIT. AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE PERMITS. ADDING
SECTION 7.900 THROUGH 7.908 TO THE SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR WOODROW WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
FITCH TO APPROVE ITEM 4.A. FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR. THE MOTION
PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 5 IN FAVOR AND 0 AGAINST (1 ABSTENTION -
LUNDBERG).
PUBLIC HEARINGS - Please limit comments to 3 minutes. Request to speak cards are
available at both entrances. Please present cards to City Recorder.
Speakers may not yield their time to others.
l. Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Springfield Municipal Code Concerning Real Property
Compensation.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 6126 - AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING REAL PROPERTY
COMPENSATION AMENDING SECTION 2.920 "DEFINITIONS" (1) "APPRAISAL".
SECTION 2.920 "EXEMPT LAND USE REGULATION" (4)(B), SECTION 2.930
"DEMAND APPLICATION". SECTION 2.940 "APPLICATION REVIEW CRITERIA"
(2), SECTION 2.942 "INITIAL NOTICE OF DEMAND AND RECOMMENDATION BY
CITY MANAGER". SECTION 2.950 "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. REVOCATION
OF DECISION, GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATION", AND SECTION 2.953
"CITY COUNCIL DECISION EFFECT" OF CHAPTER 2 "GOVERNMENT AND
ADMINISTRATION" OF THE SPRINGIELD MUNICIPAL CODE. DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 3
.
Planning Manager Greg Mott presented the staff report on this item. As an element to the Real
Property Compensation process, the council directed staff to routinely update the ordinance to
reflect changes in the law, the interpretation of the law, and to incorporate efficiencies into the
process derived from frrst-hand experience. The amendments in Attachment 1 represent the fIrst
of these updates.
On March 14,2005, the council reviewed at Work Session the amendments in Attachment l,
together with the State Attorney General's opinion regarding blanket waivers and transferability
of waivers. The amendments include: a definition of appraisal that does not require MAl
certification; drinking water protection as an exempt land use regulation; requirement of a copy of
land use regulations in place at the time the claimant acquired the property; provisions for public
meeting notice including how and when to provide written testimony; and a provision that council
action regarding modification or removal of a regulation is transferable to the extent required by
Ballot Measure 37. At the conclusion of the Work Session, council directed staff to submit these
amendments for public hearing on April 4, 2005, with an additional amendment clarifying
benefits that may accrue to a family or business partner who performs the real property appraisal
as part of the claim for compensation.
.
Mr. Mott said some minor wordsmithing changes had been made to the ordinance. He referred to
the changes made and explained those changes. They were housekeeping changes or related to
the ripple affect the proposed changes would have on the language that existed in the text
elsewhere. He explained the changes in sections 4,5, 6(e), 7 (3), 8 (4), 9 (5)(6)(7) as noted in the
proposed ordinance. To date, the courts had not heard case and the legislature had not acted upon
this.
Mayor Leiken opened the public hearing.
No one appeared to speak.
Mayor Leiken closed the public hearing.
Councilor Woodrow thanked staff for their diligence.
Mayor Leiken appreciated staff for keeping it simple and uncomplicated.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR WOODROW WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
LUNDBERG TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 6126. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE
OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE - Limited to 20 minutes. Please limit comments to 3
minutes. Request to Speak cards are available at
both entrances. Please present cards to City
Recorder. Speakers may not yield their time to
others.
.
1. Wil Hoff. President of Neighborhood Watch Board of Directors. 658 South 57th Street. Space
#46, Springfield, OR Mr. Hoff had requested and was granted to speak for ten minutes
during tonight's Business from the Audience. Mr. Hoff said he wanted to bring the Mayor
and council up-to-date on the Neighborhood Watch Program. Neighborhood Watch was
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 4
.
started in Springfield in 1982 and was established as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. He
said today fifty-one Neighborhood Watch Groups existed in Springfield. Each consists ofa
comm1;mity, a block or a complete neighborhood. In all, there are 1400+ members, which
make up about ten percent of Springfield's population. A member could be a household, a
single person or a family group. Each group should have regular meetings for sharing local
information and training. These groups are a real help to the police as they are the eyes and
ears of the community. He gave an example of how the neighborhood group had helped in
his own community when a drug house was operating in their neighborhood. Through the
efforts ofthe neighbors in Neighborhood Watch, the owner of the drug house moved away.
He explained that the job of the Board of Directors was to provide leadership and training so
the members could spot suspicious activity. Neighborhood Watch was homeowners'
insurance that really worked. They trained on crime prevention including burglary, arson,
robbery and identity theft. They brought in professional crime prevention persons to conduct
training seminars to teach the members. Other things they offered included home inspection,
upgrading oflocks, lighting, motion lights, alarm systems, and training on how to keep
valuables secure. Neighborhood Watch posted signs and decals to show the neighborhood
was watching. Neighborhood Watch had made grant applications to two organizations to
help with expenses. He said a few weeks ago he attended a HomeLand Security conference
in Salem. HomeLand Security would depend on Neighborhood Watch. He described what
was done during World War II regarding block wardens that alerted the police to danger.
This was similar and dependent on Neighborhood Watch to do what was necessary.
HomeLand Security was concerned about any type of disaster that could occur and wanted
Neighborhood Watch members to be ready to be the ftrst responders in local situations. First
responders were those that were in the area, and may be ahead of Police and Firefighters. Mr.
Hoff thanked council for the extra time and asked that they call if they had questions. He
submitted some of the Neighborhood Watch newsletters for council to review.
.
2. Fred Simmons. 312 S. 52nd Place. Springfield. OR Mr. Simmons said he was told there
would be a resolution proposed that the council would dedicate a portion or all of the Utility
Tax to jail operations. He said the findings, the ordinance, the ballot title and referral had
been done and for council to say they would bind future councils and Budget Committees to
that was a bit of a stretch. He said the facts spoke for themselves and the ordinance and
ballot title were already written. Such a resolution would not change the facts.
3. Dan Egan. 850 North 6th Street. Springfield. OR Mr. Egan said he was the Executive
Director of the Springfield Chamber of Commerce. He referred to the editorial written by
Chamber President Corkey Gourley which urged council to link the funds from the Utility
Tax made more strongly. He said it was hard for a Chamber to come out in favor of a tax, but
they supported the jail and now the jail must be funded. The Utility Tax was a way to take
care of that problem. No one wanted to pay more taxes. Those that were committing crimes
would not want to see the funding found for the jail. He said the Chamber takes it seriously
when advocating for a tax, but they understood that with the bonding issues imposed by the
state, the burden would be placed on Springfield taxpayers one way or another. Any kind of
resolution that council could do to let the voters know that was the intent of the funds would
help with the Utility Tax.
.
4. Ernest Tvndall, 670 North 34th Street. Springfield. OR Mr. Tyndall said he wanted to know
if the City Council had made a decision on whether or not to accept Mr. Mott's proposal to
rezone Adam's Platt.
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 5
.
Mr. Kelly said Mr. Tyndall had been before council at previous council meetings asking for
consideration for rezoning the property where he and his neighbors lived. He noted the choices
that had been presented to council at meetings and in memorandums by Planning Manager Greg
Mott. The choices dealt with Oregon land use law and what could be done regarding refmement
plan changes, changes in zoning and cost to the citizens or the city. He said he could have Mr.
Mott come forward to explain those options. Mr. Tyndall was looking for some direction. He
knew the options, but felt that proceeding on their own would not be feasible for the property
owners because of the costs. Mr. Tyndall had asked council to consider paying for all or part of
the fees.
.
Mr. Mott came forward to explain the options. He said Mr. Tyndall and several of his neighbors
had homes on properties that were both planned and zoned light industrial. In order to reconcile
that difference, they would need to terminate their residential use and put in industrial use, or the
zoning and the plan designation would need to be changed to residential. The neighbors had no
interest in remaining industrial, but would like it changed to residential. The city had gathered
observation and data collection. Mr. Mott referred to a map from a past Communication Packet
regarding these properties and noting other properties that were zoned as such. He noted,
however, that this street was the only one in Springfield that was strictly residential. He
explained the configuration of Mr. Tyndall's street. The zoning was something from the past. He
explained the planning process. The tendency in the past was to let it be and hope it would
correct itself. That had not occurred in this case. The council had initiated this type of change in
the past. The amount of work left to do was substantially less than if nothing had been done to
this point. Some of the information had already been gathered and much of the up front costs had
come and gone. The normal fee would be about $8000 for the group processed as a single action.
Councilor Ralston said he was supportive of a property owner using the property to the best
advantage. He discussed why the property owner would want this change. Since there would be
some benefit to the owner, he would approve having the city split the cost with the property
owners.
Mayor Leiken asked how many neighborhoods in Springfield were in this situation that might
approach the city about splitting the cost of rezoning.
Mr. Mott said the city had not been approached by anyone in a similar circumstance. There had
been people who had come in to develop their property with a plan zone conflict.
Councilor Woodrow said the last time this came forward he made a motion that the city split the
cost with the owners. That motion died for the lack of a second. He would agree to make that
motion again if council were willing to vote on that, with the stipulation that it would be done for
these property owners because they had residential units on campus industrial property. He did
not want to set precedent of others who wanted to change their zoning because they can't sell
their house.
Councilor Lundberg confirmed the cost would be a total of $8000 which would be split between
property owners. For the four lots, that would be about $2000 each. She asked Mr. Tyndall if the
purpose for the rezone was to allow them to sell their property.
.
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 6
.
Mr. Tyndall explained that if any of the owners had a fire that damaged over fifty percent of their
home, they would not be covered by their insurance. He explained the issue with other property
owners. Mr. Tyndall had owned the property for three or four years, but should not have been
able to get a loan because of the zoning. The bank made an error when issuing a loan and he was
not aware of the zoning issue when he purchased the property. Others had owned their property
for a number of years. These properties were a neighborhood and should be classified as a
neighborhood. He said when Councilor Woodrow made the original motion to split the costs,
council asked for more information before making a decision.
Councilor Ralston said he did not recall that original motion, but recalled asking for additional
information.
Councilor Ballew said the city needed to do what was right for 50,000 people, not just for four
family units. She said it was important to defme who would pay and who would be benefiting.
Council had the responsibility to represent the other 58,000 people and not to set a precedent.
Mr. Tyndall said he could put down his cost.
Councilor Lundberg said she would err on the side of splitting the cost at some percentage,
because it was not a matter that was the fault of the property owner. She would opt for some type
of percentage because of a number of changes had occurred in this area. She did not know if fifty
percent would be appropriate, however.
.
Councilor Pishioneri said council wanted to do the right thing and it seemed easy to resolve this
by changing the zoning to conform. He asked if this would cause others to come forward with
the same request. He was fine with helping out these neighbors, but thought it was important to
look long term.
Councilor Ralston said council would deal with these issues one at a time. Staff had indicated
that no one else had approached the city regarding a similar request. His position was to do the
reasonable thing by the property owner.
Mr. Mott said with the plan zone conflict the city had an obligation to correct that. He said the
council was not obliged by law to make the same decision on subsequent property owners with
the same request. It would not be a question of unequal treatment, as each situation would be
different. It would be difficult to imagine an identical circumstance to this situation.
Councilor Fitch said her fIrst thought was not to have the city pay any of the costs. She said she
now was willing to listen to this and for the sake of moving it along, would agree that if all four
would agree to pay fifty percent of the total costs, subject to a quick timeline, council could
approve payment of the other fifty percent. If only one property owner accepted this offer, it
would not be valid.
.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR FITCH WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR RALSTON
TO HAVE THE CITY PAY FIFTY PERCENT OF THE TOTAL COSTS OF THE REZONE
PERMIT FEES OF $8000 IF THE FOUR PROPERTY OWNERS AGREED TO ACCEPT THE
OFFER WITHIN THIRTY DAYS TO PAY THE OTHER FIFTY PERCENT. THIS OFFER IS
ONLY GOOD FOR THIS PARTICULAR CASE AND ONLY IF ALL FOUR PROPERTY
OWNERS APPLY. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 7
.
Mr. Kelly said because ordinance and procedures did not allow council to waive or discount fees,
if the motion passed, the city would pay the additional $4000. The total $8000 would be paid:
$4000 by the city and $4000 by the property owners.
5. David Rodriguez. 87984 Heather Drive. Springfield. OR. Mr. Rodriguez referred to an issue
that he brought to council twenty years ago regarding the drift boat as the city emblem. He
said the city council at that time dug in as deeply as this City Council had regarding
RiverBend. He said he brought the driftboat to the voters through an initiative and the voters
chose to have it as the city logo. He said two Friday's ago, he had come to the Public Works
Department to look through a file regarding RiverBend and Baldy View Lane. He had
earmarked some files that he wanted copied. He said one of those documents, an
interdepartmental memo which referenced three feet of fill at the entrance of the flood
channel, was removed and disappeared. He said he was ashamed of Springfield. He said
council had the opportunity to analyze the risk of channel migration, but did not direct staff to
look into this risk. He said that would be considered gross negligence on the part of the
council should the channel realign. He discussed Councilor Ralston's votes against this
project in the past and the vote of support he made tonight. Mr. Rodriguez said the fill at the
mouth of that channel could likely impact the entire flood plain analysis. Ifthat was illicit
fill, the flood plain analysis would be invalid. He explained why. He discussed the Sony fill
and said there was no permit. He said he wished council would have asked staff to look into
this issue. Because they didn't, it didn't show due diligence on council's part.
.
6. Curtiss Greer. 357 55th Street. Springfield. OR. Mr. Greer said he felt that the council trying
to mislead the people into thinking the Utility Tax could be diverted to one thing was a bad
move. He said council should look at other sources of revenue to solve the jail operations
issue.
COUNCIL RESPONSE
CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
1. Correspondence from Wil Hoff, President of the Springfield Neighborhood Watch, 344 North
A, Springfield, OR Requesting Additional Time to Speak Before Council.
2. Correspondence from Christopher D. Horton, 1085 Calvin Street, Eugene, OR Regarding the
Soup Kitchen and the American Legion Hall.
3. Correspondence from Judith E. Harold, Youth Services Manager, Springfield Library, 225
Fifth Street, Springfield, OR Regarding the Early Literacy Program Offered at Springfield
High School's Young Parent Class.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR WOODROW WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
LUNDBERG TO ACCEPT THE CORRESPONDENCE FOR FILING. THE MOTION
PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
BIDS
ORDINANCES
.
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Springfield.
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 8
.
l. Committee Appointments
a. Arts Commission Appointment
Librarian Barbara Thompson presented the staff report on this item. The Arts
Commission has one vacancy on its board. Member Sandra Dominguez has moved from
Springfield and has therefore resigned from the commission. Her term would expire Dec.
31, 2007. Rosalee Baker has applied for the position.
The council reviewed Rosalee Baker's application during the March 2l work session.
The Arts Commission recommends that Rosalee Baker be appointed to the commission,
with a term to expire December 31, 2007. .
The Arts Commission reviewed her application. Ms. Baker was unable to attend the
commission's regular March meeting, but did meet with a delegated group of members
on March 17.
.
Ms. Baker, now retired, taught music in the Springfield school district for several years.
The commission believes that Ms. Baker's connections with the school district and
involvement with the music community will be of special benefit to the Springfield
community. The commission believes she is well qualified to be appointed to the Arts
Commission.
Ms. Baker meets the residence requirement that members have a business or reside within
the 97477,97478, or 97482 zip code areas.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR WOODROW WITH A SECOND BY
COUNCILOR LUNDBERG TO APPOINT ROSALEE BAKER TO THE ARTS
COMMISSION WITH A TERM TO EXPIRE DECEMBER 31, 2007. THE MOTION
PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 6 FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
2. Business from Council.
a. Committee Reports
l. Councilor Ballew said she met with Curtiss Greer and Fred Simmons regarding
sanitary sewer rates. They didn't come to agreement, but did discuss that the
difference between Springfield and Eugene is that Springfield uses rates to fmance
some capital projects that Eugene may use SDC's for. It is a long range policy that
could be considered in the future.
2. Councilor Ralston said on a humorous note, he received the lyrics to Kumbaya from
a citizen.
.
3. Mayor Leiken said he attended a press conference on bio-diesel at Rexius Forest By-
Products. He said Springfield had been a leader in environmental issues. He was
pleased with our Public Works Department as they have bought diesel vehicles that
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 9
.
could be powered by bio-diesel. Rexius had been doing this for a full year. He gave
accolades to Marcy Parker in the Public Works Maintenance Department for her role
in this project. He noted that Royal Caribbean would power their generators using
bio-diesel when they built their facility in Springfield.
Councilor Ralston noted that LRAPA had been a leader in the use ofbio-diesel.
4. Councilor Lundberg said the Community Development Advisory Committee
(CDAC) met last week and there was also a meeting with Colonial Drive neighbors.
She said the neighbors were still very unhappy about not receiving a soundwall on
the other side of Beltline opposite of Patrician. Transportation Manager Nick Amis
would bring this forward in a work session to discuss the issue with council. The
CDAC had many requests for funding. The committee completed the work and
would bring it to council soon.
5. Councilor Woodrow said several weeks ago he made a motion to direct the use ofthe
Utility Tax funds to Public Safety and Jail. He made an amendment to that motion.
He referred to Mr. Simmons comments and acknowledged that this council could not
commit future councils to anything, but once something was in place it would be
difficult to change.
.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR WOODROW WITH A SECOND BY
COUNCILOR RALSTON TO DEDICATE THE UTILITY TAX REVENUE TO
JAIL OPERATIONS. (Voting results below)
Councilor Ballew said the Utility Tax was to assist the General Fund. There needed
to be enough fmancing to support the city and the jail would be a new expenditure.
There was enough difficulty trying to deal with the fmancing issues the city faced
now. She said she would not support this dedication.
Councilor Lundberg said the ballot measure stated that this was on the ballot for
General Services. It would be misleading to tie something down when it was not on
the ballot. The ballot stated it was for General Services and that was why it went to
referendum to give voters the chance to decide. She said she would not support
dedicating these funds. She agreed with Councilor Ballew that there was a budget to
balance now and the jail was a separate function. She acknowledged that the council
asked the voters to approve a ballot measure that stated the jail would not be built
until funding was found of the jail operations. She said no matter how supportive she
was in trying to address the city's needs regarding the jail, there were other ways to
come up with the funding. She said the city needed to look at ways to balance the
budget now and to fund the jail. She said it would send the wrong message to the
community because it was not a united front among councilors.
.
Councilor Fitch said she would support the motion. Council put out to the voters the
opportunity to state whether or not they wanted the city to build a jail along with the
rest of the public safety facility. In a compromised move, it was part of the measure
that the city would not build the jail without funding for operations. She felt the
funding source had been found through the Utility Tax. There would always be
challenges with the revenue for the General Fund, but this could be a way to identify
City of Springfield
Council Regular Meeting Minutes
April 4, 2005
Page 10
.
the source to fund the operations so the jail could be built. Future councilors could
change this decision, but right now if a majority of the councils agreed, the funds
would go to the operation of the jail during this cycle.
Councilor Ralston referred to Greg Shaver's comments about using the Utility Tax
for funding for the jail and the difference it would make in how his family would
vote. Councilor Ralston said the jail was something the citizens felt strongly about
and if council wanted to show faith to the voters that council would go forward with
a way to fund the jail, this motion would be important. Ifthe funds were not
dedicated, they would be gone by the time the jail was ready to be built. He said that
although he had said in the past that he would not support the Utility Tax, under these
circumstances he would change his mind.
THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 4 FOR AND 2 AGAINST (BALLEW
AND LUNDBERG)
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY MANAGER
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8: 10 p.m.
.
Minutes Recorder Amy Sowa
Attest:
~~
City Rec der
.