HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/01/2005 Work Session
.
City of Springfield
Work Session Meeting
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION MEETING OF
THE SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
MONDAY, AUGUST 1,2005
The City of Springfield Council met in a work session in the Jesse Maine Room, 225 Fifth
Street, Springfield, Oregon, on Monday, August 1,2005 at 5:45 p.m., with Councilor President
Woodrow presiding.
ATTENDANCE
Present were Councilors Ballew, Ralston, Fitch, Lundberg, Woodrow and Pishioneri. Also
present were Assistant City Manager Cynthia Pappas, City Attorney Joe Leahy, City Recorder
Amy Sowa and members of the staff.
Mayor Leiken was absent (excused).
1. Request for Proposals (RFP) for Justice Center Architect.
Project Manager Carole Knapel presented the staff report on this item. The Request for
Proposals (RFP) has been drafted for the selection of an architectural firm for the Justice Center
facility. The document is being presented to the City Council for review and discussion before it
is published.
.
The next step in the development of the Justice Center project is the selection of the architect.
The architect selected for this project must be able to produce a design which will provide for the
city's justice system requirements. Equally important, the facility will be a significant
community building and therefore the design will need to reflect the values of Springfield and be
inviting and open to the citizens of the community.
The RFP identifies the criteria which will be used to select the architect for this project. The
qualifications of the firm(s) and the individuals to be assigned to the project rank highest in the
list of criteria. The successful firm must be able to demonstrate design experience in criminal
justice facilities and in community/civic center buildings. Other factors include a demonstrated
understanding of our community, experience in incorporating public participation into the design
process, experience in the design of sustainable buildings and experience in the use of a CM/GC
construction process.
Following the review of the RFP by the City Council, staff will publish the document in
accordance with ORS 279B.055 and begin the selection process.
Ms. Knapel reviewed the RFP docunient included in the agenda packet as Attachment A. The
RFP document had been reviewed by the city's Executive Team (ET), Mr. Liebert, consultant for
the Justice Center Project and a retired Architect.
Ms. Knapel noted that the selection of the Justice Center Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)
had been moved up to late September in order to get more applicants.
.
Councilor Pishioneri discussed the benefit of sustainable design. He said if we went towards a
lead building, that could be a source of state or federal funding potential for the energy savings,
etc.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
August 1, 2005
Page 2
.
Councilor Lundberg referred to Attachment A, page 7 in the proposed RFP. She said fifteen
points seemed high regarding Item 7 in the Evaluation Criteria since the council had not yet
approved the CM/GC contracting method.
Ms. Knapel said the points could be reduced or the question given less weight.
Councilor Ballew asked if contractors were checked to make sure they had Oregon insurance.
Mr. Leahy said the city's Purchasing Officer, Jon Hiltbrand, checked on those and made sure
they were Oregon companies. They must be registered to do business in Oregon. He suggested
making it clearer in the RFP.
Councilor Ballew asked about the selection committee and if the membership had been chosen.
Mr. Knapel said that was still under consideration, but most likely it would include two
representatives from the CAC, the Police Chief and one of the Captains, the City Prosecutor or
Judge, Justice Consultant Mr. Liebert, Ms. Knapel and the Assistant City Manager. They were
also considering including two councilors as ex-officio members and one member from the
Planning Commission.
Councilor Ballew asked if someone had experience working with architects.
Carole Knapel said she had that experience.
.
Councilor Fitch asked about Item 6 under Evaluation Criteria, Local Familiarity. She asked if it
was an attempt to look at local architects. She noted that it received the same number of points
as Item 1, Justice Facility Experience.
Ms. Knapel said the term "working in the Pacific Northwest in general" referred to things like
earthquake codes and other general requirements. "Springfield area" refers more to
understanding what Springfield was all about and the issues that were important to Springfield.
An important piece was knowing the right federal, state and local building codes they must
comply with.
Discussion was held regarding Justice Experience and whether or not to increase the points for
that issue.
Councilor Fitch suggested taking five points from Item 7 and adding them to Item 1, Justice
Experience.
Councilor Ballew asked if this was a contract where cost could not be a guiding influence.
Discussion was held regarding cost as an effect of this contract.
Mr. Leahy said he would confirm whether or not this is the type of contract where cost cannot be
a guiding influence or if cost lli a factor whether or not that needed to be noted in the RFP.
Councilor Woodrow complimented staff on their work.
.
2. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Study Consultant Presentation.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
August 1, 2005
Page 3
.
Deputy Fire Chief John Garitz presented the staff report on this item. In light of the continuing
decline in the reserves of the EMS fund, a national consulting firm was engaged to conduct a
comprehensive financial and operational analysis ofthe city's EMS and medical transportation
system to identify potential areas for improving financial and operational performance.
The primary goal of the project is to analyze Springfield Fire and Life Safety's EMS and
ambulance transportation program to determine ifthere are options to improve efficiency,
effectiveness and economy to make the EMS program sustainable into the future.
For the past several years, the City's EMS fund has experienced a negative operating cash flow
which has reduced the EMS Fund reserve below acceptable levels.
The EMS Study consultant will present his finding to council and be available for questions.
Mr. Garitz reviewed the EMS Program and the issues it had faced over the last few years
regarding funding losses. He said they would hope to come back to council after summer recess
for options for a more sustainable EMS Program budget. He noted that staff had also made a
recommendation to the City Manager for the formation of a Fire and Life Safety Planning Task
Force and they would be asking for input on that option as well.
Mr. Garitz introduced Rick Kellar from Fitch and Associates.
.
Mr. Kellar gave a history ofthe EMS Program and funds and the reason why this study was
done. Two primary causes for the bulk of the deficit were identified. The first was the
implementation of the Medicare Fee Schedule. This schedule impacted the west coast
significantly and had been phased in since 2002. The Medicare Modernization Act mitigated the
impact to the Pacific by adding some additional revenue for Medicare reimbursement and
extending the phase-in until 2009. That did not counteract the major impact. The second major
impact was the pull-out of the City of Eugene for billing and collections and the separation of the
FireMed operations resulting in a loss of revenue. He said the Springfield system was a high
performance EMS system. He explained the characteristics of high performance EMS. He
discussed the number of medic units the EMS program runs.
Mr. Kellar said patient revenue for the 5000+ transports generated out of the EMS System was
approximately $2.5M and with the projection, came in a little better. The new projection
indicated the impacts of the Medicare of Modernization Act and that the biggest impact of the
Medicare Fee Schedule had passed. FireMed generated $500,000, billing services $300,000+
and other revenue $100,000. The revenue supporting the EMS Fund was approximately $3.5M.
The expenses allocated to the EMS Fund were approximately $4.4M. The department had been
cutting expenses so that figure may be less. The deficit may be somewhat lower than the
$900,000 projected because of the factors listed above. He discussed the expenditures from the
EMS Fund which included: approximately $3M for personnel; $600,000 for dispatch fees paid to
City of Eugene and indirect expenses paid to the City of Springfield; and the vehicle rent. The
total non-personnel costs were approximately $1.5M.
.
Mr. Kellar said during the twenty years of surplus funds in the EMS Fund, a number of positions
in the Fire Department that were not directly related to EMS and ambulance transportation were
funded through the EMS revenues. There was approximately $400,000 of specific non-EMS
personnel positions funded through the EMS Fund. The EMS and FireMed provide a positive
financial contribution to the city over and above the direct expenditures that were required to
generate those funds and operate the EMS System. If the city were to eliminate EMS, the city
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
August 1,2005
Page 4
.
would still need to locate $l.2M to fund those positions that EMS currently funds. The
dispatching fees would not be decreasing if EMS were eliminated because Fire would still be
dispatched.
Mr. Kellar described the three EMS delivery options under consideration including: 1)
Eliminate EMS; 2) Modify Staffing for Fire Services and EMS; and 3) Retain Current System.
He explained the advantages and disadvantages of each option. He discussed the EMS funding
options including: 1) Modify Use and Sources of Funding; 2) Fire District Consolidation; 3)
Ambulance District; 4) Medical Response Fee; 5) Regional Non-emergency Ambulance
Services; and 6) Expand Current Revenue Producing Programs. He discussed the advantages
and disadvantages of each of the options. He said Springfield's EMS Program was well-
respected throughout the Northwest. He said it was efficient and well run.
Mr. Kellar discussed changes locally. He talked about the South Lane County Medic Unit in
Creswell and the City of Eugene moving their medic unit to Station 6, which was in an area that
Springfield would have normally responded to. He discussed the loss in revenue relating to
some ofthose changes. He discussed the impact on Eugene when the Lane Rural District
implemented its medic program. PeaceHealth moving into Springfield would be a large impact
to the program. Discharges from the hospital would account for an increase in volume. Any
time a transport could be done that would generate revenue it was a positive.
Mr. Kellar summarized the [mdings of the report. He said Springfield had a good system and
was a positive contributor to the city. The forecast in the next five years showed it would
continue to be a positive contributor. He named things that could mitigate this deficit.
.
Councilor Ralston asked about delivery Option 2 which discussed reducing the number of people
at a station from five to four. Springfield had five stations, but only three would be affected by
this reduction.
Mr. Kellar said he would be cautious reducing staffing from Station 3.
Councilor Ralston asked why a fire truck had to follow an ambulance to a call.
Mr. Kellar said the standard was for the Fire Department to provide medical first response. The
trend was to elevate the first response to the ALS or paramedic level, which Springfield had.
The ambulance would arrive shortly after the fire truck to transport the patients if needed. The
ambulances were busier than the fire trucks, so the fire truck could generally arrive before the
ambulance. He said operational changes mayor may not be able to be made, but those were the
operations standards. Once the ambulance arrived and it was determined the fire truck was not
longer needed, it was released.
Mr. Garitz said there were five fire engines and three medic units. The fire engines were more
geographically disbursed around the city and could arrive to the call sooner than the medic units
and begin on the care of the patient. He discussed the standard and the nationwide goal to reach
the scene in four minutes or less ninety percent of the time.
Mr. Kellar said the response time for an ambulance was more like ten minutes. He discussed the
importance of getting medical attention to the patient as quickly as possible.
.
Chief Murphy said the number of personnel at the scene related to how quickly they could get a
patient out, especially with multiple injuries. He explained. Even if the city eliminated the
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
August 1, 2005
Page 5
.
ambulance service, the Fire Department would still be first responders and would need to have
the personnel to assist.
Councilor Ralston asked if it took two people to run a fire truck and get it to a location.
Chief Murphy said it did take at least two people to drive the truck. He explained. Federal
OSHA guidelines required four people on every fire apparatus to respond and initiate the interior
attack for a fire. Springfield only uses three, but with the ambulance there are four or more on
the scene. Any combination of fire truck and ambulance could be used.
Councilor Ralston said that was for fire, but he was asking about emergency response.
Councilor Ballew said EMS had done a lot of work, but they were not self-supporting. The
paramedics paid from the General Fund were doing more of the work. She was not saying to
stop EMS, but she felt changing the billing to only do direct billing did not make sense. These
were all city services.
Mr. Kellar said the ambulance transport component of EMS generated the revenue as well as
FireMed. The amount of money that came in for the patient revenue and FireMed in the billing
services was more than what it cost to provide those services. He said even without EMS, the
city would need to find $ 1. 2M to fund other non-EMS positions in the city's fire department.
Councilor Ballew said she didn't agree and felt it was not a complete picture.
.
Councilor Fitch said things were changing in the fire service. She asked about the ratio of the
number of calls for EMS versus fire.
Mr. Kellar said it was seventy percent medical and thirty percent non-medical. He said that was
fairly consistent from fire service to fire service. He said this was on the high side of non-
medical. Many times it was seventy-five to eighty percent medical.
Councilor Fitch asked about the number of firefighters on each apparatus and if that was enough
according to the standards based on Federal guidelines.
Mr. Kellar explained the number of personnel on the apparatus. The majority of fire departments
operate with three personnel on each fire engine and have a mechanism to bring it back to four.
He said he did not know of any fire departments that had cut back to two personnel per
apparatus. Some cities rotate which stations are closed on a given date.
Councilor Fitch discussed the option Eugene had adopted in responding to certain calls and
asked if something similar had been considered for Springfield.
Mr. Kellar discussed the option Eugene had used in using civilian paramedics rather than
firefighter paramedics. There was not a great financial benefit for Springfield to change to that
option. He said the only flexibility would be not to use traditional shifts.
Councilor Pishioneri asked if staffscheduling options were part ofthe analysis.
.
Mr. Kellar discussed the minimum requirement for a service area and the East Lane County area.
He said scheduling was not specifically in the analysis, but was considered. He discussed the
. .
.
.
.
City of Springfield
Council Work Session Minutes
August 1, 2005
Page 6
issue regarding changing the scheduling, maintaining staffmg and the risk involved if the units
were understaffed.
Chief Murphy discussed ISO ratings from the insurance company. Springfield's ISO rating is
three. He noted that Springfield had grown faster than the services. He discussed funding for
EMS personnel and fire engines. It was difficult to isolate funding and expenses.
Councilor Ballew asked about serving East County and if it was worth reducing.
Mr. Kellar said servicing that area was regulated by the state and they probably would not
change their service areas. He reminded council of existing capacity and the revenue that comes
from it. He said Springfield was behind on the firefighter personnel side but not on the
ambulance personnel side.
Ms. Pappas said that information could be covered at a subsequent meeting after council recess.
Councilor Ralston said he was happy with the service Springfield had, but there needed to be a
balanced budget. He discussed expanding billing services and asked about the actual cost of
running the EMS Program. He said he would like a better picture of projections. He noted that
he was opposed to districts. He referred to Mr. Kellar's comment about needing more equipment
if the service area was expanded and asked about ambulance service in outlying areas and if
there was already enough service in those areas.
Chief Murphy suggested a task force of community members that could bring forward options.
Council asked staff to bring back answers to their questions and options to balance the budget at
a Work Session sometime following council recess.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:02 pm.
Minutes Recorder - Amy Sowa
Attest:
!Jl(j.~
City Recorder