Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Correspondence 2007-4-13 Ap r. n 2007, 10: OOAM I 1 ~ No,l/1J ~ ~ c3 /J"J,.. ~ 71v K & A Engineering, Inc. l- ., _J 33~7 Roanoke Ave., Eugene, OR 97408 G., (jjJJ fJfTJ1vl/ (541) 684-9399 Voice t{J1Jf I 1/ (541) 684-9358 FAX engineering Fax To: Paul - Mettebeke Construction From: Marvis Remboldt Fax: 686-2400 Pages: 7 Date: April 13, 2007 Subject: Springfield Questionnaire - Lot 38 Dear Paul, Attached is a copy of the completed questionnaire for Lot 38 If you have any questions, please call our office. Thank you for your business. Sincerely, ~~ Marvis M. Rembolclt K & A Engineering, Inc. Business Manager Apr,..13: 2,007,10:00AM I~ 0, III j I, L C\'1l1l1IlJl1'1\' ~~'I \ KL~ l>1\' Build:,'!! 0.\1(:\) CITY (H' SPR [:'\1(;\= [I- I I),OREC;O!\; ::!:::~ 5'1',\(i\'L'L Srllll~TII\':<1 OR \)7~77 Ph 7:::()-~?5l) Mountaingate Subd. Lot # _4f) I I I , , ,.~ ./. r ',l.. . '... ..L~~~ , I _.' i . '," ,." ., "." I . . .." 8l'i...'~!.l!IiloM~""'I'i~"ila.lIilllliO~~ ;:" ." '" ""',, ,;,:..\1!~1I .______._~_;-..Ii_II~~~.~~.~\~:t::l ~~~I.J\\A' ;" ~~~1:~ ',',it:~ , l,(!"...3>~r~~.~I~~}?:-- I" l I,,,: I' J, 1_"_'",:,::,','_' ~l~)." ~~i.'\~ ::....... ~, ' " Mountaingate Subdivision . Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals SITE ADDRESS ~B'\Iu ~, CITY JoB # 0~-i~1 Foundation reouirements - new structures on residential lots This form. may be used as a verification to allow construction to continue On the job site until the stamped' AFFIDAVIT For Site Investhzation Questionnaire' is submitted to the City. This form mu~t be completed by a licensed design professional (engineer or architect) or hisfher authorized representative, and submitted to the building inspector prior to requesting City inspections Of placing foundation concret~. It is important that all questions be answered completely for the foundation site to be approved for construction. Owner \0{u-\:- \Jl)~\J\cl-\ . ~ Contractor \\\ ~\ \e\jete- Co\G~OY\ \ A. Datt)?f the design pl'OfessionaPs site evaluation? ~.; ~f.l '1iq,tJr'~-'L. tI 1'1/?A-.,7 _ I - (J - T, I B. Has the design professional reviewed a copy of the geotechnical information that was prepared for the subdivision relating to this site? Yes';&No_ ~f' 1lot, please contact this office for a copy of the report. The design professional must be familiar with the geotechnical infonnation before completing this form. C. In which Geotechnical Investigation category is this site located? Level I )L Level II _ Note: J-,evel II reauires a site~sDecific l!eotechnical investigation & report Were any site conditions identitled that would change the category? YES_ NO X- (POI' Ctllen" determining categ.ol')I, see the specific GeotechnIcal Report for the eorrect phase of the subdiviSIon) If "yes", explaIn (use the reverSe side of this sheet or an added sheet if necessary) 10f5 A p r, 13 1 2.0 0 7 ' 1 0 : 00 AM NO III j 1"', j COI11I11Unl!) ~l'r\'lu.:\ 1)1\. Building ">dlLl) lITY Or' ~PRr!\"Cib!!'L[). OREGON n.:; .:;,/. <;IIU'! Sp11lil!!ll"ld, ()R <)7477 Ph 7 2(1- ~'/5t) Mountaingate Subd. Lot # ~ W a~ a geotechnical engineer involved at the site to venfy that conditions are suitable for construction of the propol:.ed building(s)? Y e~ j{ No_ Name of geotechnical eng11lcer l' D. What was the nature of the excavation and lor fill? 'Z- /JR- .h~(kx:~ P-J--U-- O--Uf..t2- '7_"-/' -z.1 IJ~ 8~J..i 'CJ(Y____,4.JVJc-,. ~P-TI ~1..2T ~lc:r o'-fK- r.4"~"'ih~A..J ~T!~ <JfT~ Was existing non-structural tlll or expansive soil encountered on the lot? Yes~ No_ If "yes", what types, depth~ and locatIOns, and how does it affect the building foundation'! 2./~ ,,?J d]Z- <drl (7;t4~/c: s;:~ ~/T1f ~rr5--- What measures were taken to remedy the soil condition (include type of ~ engineered fill used to stabilize the soil)? 7~ /!1d.J.~, 1Lf:114()v(n;;-, ~~~/ L ~fF'<J 1..>/.0::.11 ~l..l.{ ((f-Fn ~(.rC ~.. A&fZQ x.. v;J:, ~i ~ ~!f1(~'/ ~~-fFfJ ~1U=-G-~ f...Jl5"/CF L~F"77 b...tv iJ I ~ /(t'7 Ai IVJJ-T7VF ~n.iE?- s;.~' ~ r~ I ~'tl;!!J2. I~ the ~ite as prepared adequate ~ rnadequate 0 to maintain constant moisture content in the sub grade? Note: Verifiwtion of moisture stabilization in the sub glade is a requirementfor site preparation, and must be affirmed befure consTruction can continue. If inadequate, what measures arc to be taken to provide constant moi~ture content in the sub grade? IN Is the site, as pleparcd, adequate~ inadequateD to support the proposed structure? An a.fJinnative an'lWer IS requisite to proceeding with construcTiOn. If l.nadequate, what additional work is needed to provide adequate foundation support? E. Did the design professional witness placement and compaction of the engineered fill, Or is there a special inspection report forthcoming from a qualified agency? I witnessed Placement M. Speciallnsp/compaction report lX1 :5"~~ Ar-tr-))Clf-F(} (l g'4<T 20f5 A p r... 13. 2007, 1 0 : 00 AM No, I / I j ~, if C0I11Il1\JlI1L) SCl\ It<:' DI\'. J3LII!dlng ~.\kl\ CITY Of SPR.l~(ir; !1:.LD. ORH~()!'\ ::!2') :;'1' SIIl'l'(. :;PIIIlt'lldd, OR t)7-lTi Ph 72<', ~75'J Moumaingate Subd. Lot # ~ F. The design professional intends to use the following method for installation of perforated perimeter footing drains: The design on the attached drawing provided by the design profe)~ional. . .. 0 The method shown on the original constrUction drawings. . . . . . . , " .. . . .. 0 The typical 'Foundation Drain' drawmg attached to permIt .., ................ ~ Perforated perimeter drains are not required...,. ......................... .,. 0 Comments: - Note; City inspeclOrs will inspect installed drains prior ro Cover upon request... Call: 726-3769 ro schedule inspection. G. Low-point crawl space drains are required to preyent the build-up of excess moisture inside the foundation') during (and after) construction. This drain may he installed after foundation placement only with the eXDress nermission of the desi~n nrofessional. u. The design professional has determined the following: The crawl space dram is required when thefoundati011 is instalLed...__ 0 The low-point drain can be inszalled after foundation placement without a sign~fi('ant moisture build~up problem within thefoundarion............. ,0 (The low-point drain may he installed at the stage f 1 t. ) pOiI & b(,cll/l, frumillli. rt}ofillg, ('It ~ cons rue um . b. Has the design professional observed and approved the installation ofzhe required low point drain?................................... Yes, No if "yes", where is the low point drain located under the building and where does U Ienninate at this time? (Must be an approved location, I.e. sZreet gutter, stonn sewer, sump pump and discharge line to the street, elc. ) A1l> L --!5?J5- ;ZA-N~.-r- -O-/? ...d....aJ /5" /lZF ~VLil[~ik The de~ign profe')sional must determine whether the approved permit drawings have adequate foundation steel. Is any additional foundation steel required that is not shown on the foundation drawings for the building? Yes No Y" {f "yes", describe additional steel required (or provide drawing). 30f5 A P L. 13. :J 0 0 I 1 0 : 01 AM I~ o. III j \, J C,)l11lill'I1Ily SLI \ ICC~ [)I\ B\ldt1J1lg Satel) CTi Y OF S PR 1 \;(1 FTr-:, ,[) OR F(j()i\ , ~~5 "'i(i, ~tl ~d. SJ1lln~f1L'ld, OJ{ l)7477 Ph 7:/1- \750 Mountaingate Subd. Lot # A.ro The individual doing the observations and providing directionfor the excavation and site preparation work on the property must siJ;n the following statement. The undersigned design professional (or authorized employee) attests that he/she observed requzred moisture stability procedures On this site, and that such procedures were accomplished before any changes occurred in the moisture content of the sub- grade under and around the building (where expansive soils were encountered). The undersigned further attests that the sub-grade, as prepared, is adequate to support the building proposed for this site. Additional comments: (Note): A copy of this report shall be kept on site with the al>proved plans at all times. , . This report shall be followed hy an affidavit, signed and stamped by the design professional under whose auspices this report wac; completed, affirming the information herein. The signed/stamped affidavit together with a copy of this report shall be submitted to this office prior to requesting framing inspection for the building. ~~~ Signature~ .. . - . Nam~/, r-M(i>A7/>-r- Title~JLfc/.Pt.I='". .*-:{IJ-~I~('4~r- Company---, ~,~ t::D~JJvjr"1Stt.J#Cr~ F..u~; ,. Phone~4 - '95 '1 q _ Liccnsee-Yr~ ~hdLl'.Jr P? (-5... , License # /94- 7d- .- _ . ~xPires-Lz/ ~j /0 e> The geotechnical report for each phase of the Mountaingate Subdivision makes recommendations for placement of building constmction on each site. Thc report also recommends that site preparation during wet weather conditions be avoided unless special measures are taken to mitigate ~oft soil conditions and moisture collecting in or around the foundation areas during and after the construction process. PositIve site drainage must be provided. 40f5 A pr, 13. 200 / 1 0 : 01 AM I~o, I/U ~, b CI'I1lillUllLl~ ~crVlce-; \)1\', lluJldill~ SakI) CITY OF SPR fNUHl:.LD. OREGON 2.25 )'11 Sired Spr1ilt!fil'ld OR <17477 Ph 7'2(l-,7YJ Mountaingate Subd. Lot # 4B =-~;;:t~t;~ '::_ ..._J-,)o ~,.,.,. .'.".~'I, of:"",. ..["...,<. .,. ""~. '"....' 'c' '~""""'I"_J_"~'''''''' _'. ,~'<~ ~ _--.-.~ _~:"'.\~!/!"I~~J" 'I'-l(~," ~ 'l~ \l1 q 1 ~' ~~~~i:/~x~r~('\, ;1 ,I ~" ',~ ~ Site Addre% ,,-~_\ ~';'::;~',:~',Y;',," " ',~ AFFIDAVIT For Site Investigation Questionnaire Foundation Sub-Grade Approval for Residential Building Site in Mountaingate Subdivision The undersigned hereby affirms that the excavation, structural fill and moisture stabilizalion methods for the buIlding site at the address shown above were observed by me or an authorized employee of my firm and that the following is true: 1. The geotechnical information for the subdivision, specific to this site, wa.:; utilized as part of the detennination for foundation preparation and drainage requirem.ents. 2. The foundation sub-grade is capable of supporting a minimum of 1500 psf, and is adequate to support the building proposed for this site. 3. The moisture content of the excavation was adequately maintained during the site preparation pro~ess and the site 1S adequately graded and druined for discharge to an approved locatlon in order to maintain stable moislure content throughout the construction process and [hereafter. 4. The accompanying report titled "Site Tnve~ti2:atjon Ouestionnaire for Consulting Desi!!n ProfeSSIOnals" containing field observations und instructions made on (dates) for this building site was completed eIther by me or by an authorized representative under my supervision. To the best of my know ledge, the information contained in that report is complete and accurate. Date ~/i6 .~ Name of Licensed Professional (print) _M I CI;f-/Jt:F / Signaturc-~ .. ~, , ,A ~ r " ,13, ~ 0 07, 1 0 : 01 AM No, 1/13 ~,I Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregates In-Place ASTM 02922 and 03017 Proieet: 42 07 Site Address: 6005 Graystone Loop Permit No: C7 -297 Oate: 4/3/2007 Densltv Test Type': DT-6" Operator: SS Material Type: 3/4" (-) S~rmgfieJd quarry Maximum Dry Denstiy, pcf 128 Standardization and Relerence Check Ii Density (Standard Deviations) (S.D.) 066 f1 Moisture, .(S.D:) 0.66 Test No. 1 2 3 Moist Density, pet 130.5 137,01 134.3 Dry Density, Water pet Content, % ---- 119.1 9.6 123_9 10.5 123.31 9,0 I I I Con paction. % 93.0% 96.8% 96.3% Remarks I I --.- I -I - I l -I I I I I -l j I - I j I I -I I I Average' 95.4% Std. Dev.: 2.04% 1 Direct Transmission (01) (specify deprh, In_) or Air Gap Backscatter (AGB) (specItrY(T)ouchable or (U)ntouchable mode Test performed USing Seaman Nuclear Corp model C-300, SN 21113 Client' Meltebeke Construction Project: 42 07 I( & A Engmeering. Inc.