Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 3/25/2008 Date Reel .:lid" ., " pty of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 MAR 2 5 2008 ,..~,,.,1', ' ,"'. \ '" j ""1~~.J, r~:., ,",,,,..,lmt,,i:,._ Development Issues Meeting (DIM) - - - - -- --- - - Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: MIke Butler Phone: (541)744-2660 Company: Address: I Future B Homes Fax: (541) 744-0116 POBox 7425, Eugene, OR 97401 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: James Branch Phone: (541) 746-0637 Company: Address: I Branch Engmeermg, Inc Fax: (541) 746-0389 310 5th Street, Sprmgfield, OR 97477 Property Owner: Dan Jackson Company: Address: I Owner Phone: (541) 554-0918 Fax: 2778 19th Street, Sprmgfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-24-31 TAX LOT NOeS): Portion of2000 Property Address: 2778 19th Street Size of Property: 9 +/- Acres [gI Square Feet D Description of If-ytKI ar€: ~ ~III:; [:':,:1: Lt' hdllO, pleas.: a~~a~!. ,~..;: I-",~;:.~"..I Jc.:>'-::tJ~:;j;: l~ ~fflS aj>;:llcatlon- Proposal: Subdivide parcel mto 30+/-lots Existing Use: 1 Smgle Fallllly Residence # of Lots/Parcels: 30+/- I Prospective Applicant: ~ Signature ttf, kt Prin~ . Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: 10,000+/- sf Density: 3 dujacre d t f ~~/I Date: 3~)-h J - - ~equired Proj~ct)nform~tio~ (City Intake 5.taff: complete Jh~s sectif'n) , Case No.: J~ .0D ~ - CiSDi '+, Date: 3/2 is / D~ Application Fee: $ '5C6-DV Technical Fee: $0 Reviewed by: -hvz- Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ ;Db.~ PROJECT NUMBER: Pf\S2.D07-o00~3 , 2fY' 2cb~ - ctDS i C ~W^r 111M 1W ~cJ~~ ') Development Issues .eting Submittal Requirements Checklist \ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicab,le application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form \~ ~ ~ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting, So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan, However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5,12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements, ~ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" E Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ,,'\:J North arrow ~ Date of preparation ""'~ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number 'hJ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ~ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points @ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ~ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for , common open spaces '\.DIMS Related to Land Divisions ~ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ~ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review o o Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, drivewpys, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ,Date Rece;ved: , Parking and circulation plan o ~aAR ' ~ ~<.V'18 .9'. ....... \A....--:I OrigiN,:~ ::,u:!~,;t~= '_.__ ("I LAFLEUR Karen ~ Subject: Location: ZON2008-00018 Development Issues Mtg - Mike Butler/Future BAndy L _SP _ConfRm616 \ Thu 511/20081,30 PM Thu 5/1/20082.30 PM Start: End: Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Resources: LAFLEUR Karen, UMBIRD Andrew, MCKENNEY Gary; GORDON Gilbert; MCKEE Bart (SUB); BARRY Cella; GOTTFRIED Charles; Engineering Group (DIMs), Johnson Tamara (TamaraJ@subutil com), WALKER George _SP _ConfRm616 Required Attendees: A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, May 1, 2008 @ 1.30 - 2 30 p,m In DSD 616 The planner assigned to this application IS Andy Llmblrd, The applicant submitted plans to discuss creating a 30-lot SFR subdIVision, formally discussed as Jackson SubdiviSion off 19th & Vera Streets (lON2006-00057). Please confirm your attendance at thiS meeting, Thanks Karen Date Received: MAR 2 5 2008 Original Submittal 1 QUESTIONS FOR DAN JACKSON DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING Date Received: MAR 2 5 2008 Original Submittal TRANSPORTATION The proposal includes extension of Vera street to 19th Street, improvement of 19th Street frontage, connection to Hayden Bridge Road to the east and construction of two cul-de- sac streets extending west from 19th Street. 1, Is the city in general agreement with the proposed street layout? Are there any changes you would suggest? 2. Access to proposed comer lots along 19th Street will occur from the east-west streets, not from 19th Street. The remaining lots fronting on 19th Street will take direct access onto 19th Street. Is the city OK with the proposed driveway accesses onto 19th Street? 3. The owner would like to retain an access easement along the east edge of Lot 30 for access to the orchard to the north for farming purposes. It is anticipated that access to Lot 30 and access to the orchard would be a joint access at 19th and Hayden Bridge, Does the city see any problem with this? PUBLIC WORKS 4, The concept drainage plan includes a water quality inlet for the runoff from the south cul-de-sac and connection to the existing 12" pipe from Grand Vista. Vera and 19th Street runoff will be directed to a proposed treatment/swale to be located immediately north of the subdivision and outside the UGB. The north cul-de-sac runoff will be directed to the swale also, Overflow from the swale will be directed to the 18" pipe extending from Grand Vista and connecting near the proposed line between lots 20 & 21. Per input from city staff at the fIrst DIM for this project, storm water detention facilities are being designed & will be built west of this site. The new facilities will accommodate required detention for this project. We would appreciate any comments the city might have with this proposal. 5. It is likely that the north half of the project will require' fIll to elevate the ground surface to or above the 100 yr flood level. What level of flood elevation will be required to obtain a fIll permit? CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2008-00018 2778 19th Street /:) ---.--/ v---- ~~~ ~~~ ~ HfJi. I -J ' t- en w ""'---- Date Received: MAR 2 5 2008 ()y-~lnJSI,)l!>MllttJJ.. ,a ~--- SITE Map 17-03-24-31 Tax Lot 2000 North ...