HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 6219 03/17/2008
,~{
.<--.-
I '
\
\
-~.-..
ORDINANCE NO. 6219 (Special)
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS NEPUTE,
LOCATED IN WEST SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF KELLOG ROAD AND NORTHWEST OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH POLTAVA STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 1.03 ACRES
IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOT 800, T17S R03W S34 MAP 22; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield
by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
. Number File EC SP 07-35, effective 07/30107, as recommended in City Planning File No.
LRP2007-00017 and supported by City Council Resolution No, 07- 26 (and further described in
. Exhibit A & B), and
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow
Water District, and
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption
on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no
objections raised.
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein,
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 34 Map 22, Tax Lot 800; as
more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC
SP 07- 35.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008,
by a vote of -L for and 0 against.
ATTEST:
(hy~
City Rec der
ay of March 2008.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the ity 0
";';=['1 & APPROVED
" t- -.f}'...
~~;;~~,:jj L\~\~
. . .~. ~'.~.L~~\ DS
".:. C' :::r;i'CY XrTORNEY
/
/
., !
"".: /'
I
EXHIBIT A-1
\.)
EXIllBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Beginning at a point on the east boundary of Oak Breeze Estates as platted and recorded on file
75, slides 617 and 618 of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County Oregon, said point
being the southwest comer of lot 13, Oak Tree Subdivision as platted and recorded on file 73,
slides 781 and 782, of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County, Oregon; Thence along
the southwesterly boundary of said Oak Tree Subdivision, south 89 degrees 57' 45.0" East
173.17 feet to an angle point in the said southwesterly boundary; thence continuing along said
southwesterly boundary, and its north margin of county road No. 307 (Kellogg Street), said point
beirig 20.00 feet from, when measured at right angles' to, the centerline of Kellogg Street;
Thence along said north margin, north 79 degrees 04' 20" west 167.88 feet to a point on the east
boundary of said Oak Breeze Estates; thence leaving said north margin, along the east boundary
of said Oak Breeze Estates, north 01 degree 16' 39" east 2436.57 feet to the point of beginning,
all in Lane County, Oregon.
& 814 818
~ ~~
.=
f . i
'-.
\ ~
815 817
'. , ~
\ "'n
t ~.~.
~'.J1:1'
,..
I ..
"
800 H
I. ~ 1,02 AC.
DU9-03
Site
~ 3400
f -8e+
.....SofA}: 1
t 33;;
~:
...
43 "".e.'
10...,
. 3500 : 44 ''',n" \0.11'45 '-.'''.'4
~ f 3600 , 3700 . 3800
,I. .;..
- I ~ f~.f.l1 ~_~:j .
.".,-~. ~ U ..
""'.0'
".0'
. ~".O'
5000
4900
4800 4700
j
~
~
~
42 "".101"
July 18, 2007
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
. (541) 682-4425
FAX (541) 682-2635
TO:
Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County
Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of
Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Rainbow Water and Fire
District District; John Nepute; and Tom Poage at Poage Engineering & Surveying,
Inc.
FROM:
Paula L. Taylor, Executive Officer
SUBJECT:
EC SP 07 - 35 (Expedited Procedure)
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
(Nepute)
Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as required by ORS
199.466. Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for approval without
a public hearing or further staff study.
There are two alternatives:
1. If you agree with this recommendation, yqu need do nothing.
2. If you feel that a public hearing is needed, you must request, in writing by July 30,
2007, that a hearing should be set. The request must be in the commission's
office by 5:00 p.m., July 30th. You must use the form that is provided at the end
of the staff analysis to request a hearing. For units of government, the form
should be signed by the chairman/mayor or other authorized person. If you or
your unit of government requests a public hearing, the boundary commission asks
that you attend the requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be
set for the next availabie boundary commission public hearing.
IF YOU HA VB ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE,
PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (541-682-4425).
Attachments
pt: LCBC: L'\BClEXPlMEMOI2007lECSP0735 MEM.DOC
lAst Saved: July 18, 2007
.~
EXHIBIT B - P2
I
'"
EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
Annexation of Territory to the City of Springfield (Nepute)
I. BC File EC SP 07 - 35
Initiated by Resolution No. 07-26 by the City of Springfield with property owner/elector
consent
Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(B) of the boundary commission law
Received July 3, 2007
Public hearing requests by July 30, 2007
Description
The annexation area includes one full tax lot located in western Springfield, north of and
adjacent to Kellogg Road, south of Centennial Road, and west of Kelly Butte
Property owner: John Nepute (1491 WlJDbledon Place, Springfield)
Tax lot: 800, T17S R03W S34 Map 22
Acres: :t 1.02
Estimate of existing population: 1 (one single family residence)
Existing land use: Residential
Existing zoning in Lane County: LDRIUF-lO, low-density residential with urbanizing
fringe overlay
Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
(acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended)
. Existing public services to the properties: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County
Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (Lane County, City of
Springfield), fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of
Springfield), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District), parks (WilIamalane Park
and Recreation District)
Reason for Annexation
The property owner submitted an application to the City of Springfield requesting
annexation to prepare this l:~t for residential development. The Eugene-Springfield
Metropolitan Area General pian requires properties to annex in order to receive urban
services.
This annexation proposal was filed with the boundary commission on July 3, 2007, in accordance
with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), initiated by the City of Springfield 'with the consent from the
property owner/elector. Prior to initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received
written consent to the annexation from the property owner (John Nepute) and a majority of the
eligible electors. At the time the annexation was initiated by the city council, there one elector
registered within the annexation area and a written consent was received from the elector (John
Nepute). The statutory provision to receive consent from owners of more than one-half the land
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 1 of 9
.',
...
EXHIBIT B - P3
J
area and a majority of the electors [ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B)] is met. The applicant requested that
the provisions of ORS 199.466 (expedited procedure) be used in processing this annexation
request.
ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of anne~ations without a public hearing or adoption of a final
order if requested by the principal petitioner. Under the expedited procedure, the boundary
commission executive officer must prepare an analysis of the proposal within 15 days from its
receipt. If, after 25 days from the filing date (in this case, July 30th), no written objections are
received from direct recipients of this sta!f analysis, the request is approved. However, if any
direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled for the next regular
boundary commission public hearing. The direct recipients of this staff analysis are the
individuals eligible to request a public hearing and are listed below under the first boundary
commission standard.
The proposed annexation includes one full tax lot (refer to Maps No. 1 and 2). The tax lot in the
annexation area is currently developed with one residential unit. The annexation was initiated by
the City of Springfield after receiving the necessary consents.
The annexation area is contiguous to the City of Springfield and is in an area that is totally
surrounded by the city limits. It is located within the urban growth boundary (UGB) of the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). The Metro Plan designates
the tax lotted properties in the annexation area as low-density residential. The tax lot is zoned
LDRIUF-lO, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. Upon the
effective date of the annexation, the UF overlay will lapse and the properties will be zoned LOR
in Springfield.
Resolution No. 07-26, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council on June 4, 20m,
indicates that it had been demonstrated that the properties could be provided with key urban
services and the city requested approval of the annexation by the boundary commission.
Following is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards.
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was detennined
to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary
commission filing requirements). The petitioner requested the proposal be processed using the
expedited procedure.
This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane County boundary
commission members; Lane County commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division;
Lane County Environmental Health Division; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; City of
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP en - 35) - July 18, 20m
Page 2 of9
'J
EXHIBIT B - P4
\)
Springfield; Rainbow Water and Fire District; John Neptune; and Tom Poage of Poage
Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District, which provides water service
to properties within its boundaries. After annexation to the City of Springfield, the annexation
will be withdrawn from the district by the city in accordance with ORS 222. .The Springfield
Utility Board (SUB) is the water provider for the City of Springfield and will be the water
provider after annexation to the city occurs.
The Rainbow Water and Fire District contracts with the City of Springfield for fIre services to
properties within its boundaries. If the annexation is approved, the annexation area will be
withdrawn from the district through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in
accordance with ORS 222. The City of Springfield win provide fIre services directly to the
annexed area.
The annexation area is within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District and will remain in
the district after the annexation is approved since the city is a part of this special district. The
park district provides park and recreation services and facilities to Springfield residents.
Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane
County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.51O(2)(c)], which was formed to
provide the fInancing for the regional wastewater. treatment plant serving wastewater users within
the cities of Eugene and SpringfIeld and other users within the urbanizable area.
This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County. and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
The area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Me~o Plan.
Territory within this portion of the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. The
proposed annexation is contiguous to the City of Springfield and is in an area totally surrounded
by the city limits. Annexation of telritory to the city fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro
Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
The incremental process of annexation causes short-term boundaries to be established. The
acknowledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies the City of Springfield as the unit of
government which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area within the UGB. In the
long term, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 30f 9
~j
EXHIBIT B - P5
, I
.'
This annexation is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing
policies (1), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred
method of servicing urbanizable land.
(1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service
within urban growth boundaries when it is consistent with the. comprehensive
plan.
(2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through annexation to a city in order to provide urban services to urbanizable
lands.
(5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth
boundaries.
(7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing
city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable
lands.
Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing
out to an acknowledged urban growth boundary, short-term boundaries are created, which are
logical within the context of the future service boundary. Approval of this annexation will
eliminate the size of an existing islanded 'area.
This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield IS consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard.
Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d)
The proposal area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the
Land Conservation and Developm(:nt Commission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been
subsequently amended. The Metro, Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for
extending the minimum range of urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (policies #8
and #10, page II-C-5) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be
annexed to an existing city (policy #16, page II-C-6).
The annexation area is designated low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay in the
Metro Plan. If the annexation is approved, the annexation area will be automatically rezoned to
city LDR, low-density residential, upon the annexation effective date. .
The following services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee SP f17 - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 4 of9
,~
EXHIBIT B - P6
'J
Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. After annexation to
the city, the area will be withdrawn from the district through separate proceedings by the City of
Springfield in accordance with ORS 222 and SUB will be the water provider to the annexation
area. An orderly transition of water service will be made consistent with Oregon law and an
existing intergovernmental agreement between the two utility providers. Springfield staff
indicates there is an existing 8-inch main line adjacent to the annexation area in Kellogg Road
that can provide service to new development within the annexation area.
Electricity - Springfield staff indicates that electrical service is available from SUB-the utility
provider for territory within the City of Springfield. .
Police services - The Springfield police department can provide police protection to the area
after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Police protection and
response to priority calls can be provided to the annexation area consistent with service
protection throughout the city.
Fire and emergency services - The annexation area is provided fire and related services by the
Rainbow Water and Fire District. The district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire
services within its boundaries. After annexation to the city, the area will be withdrawn from the
district by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. Fire services will be provided
directly by the city after annexation. Springfield staff indicated that response time to the
annexation area is within the 4-minute response time standard for basic life support services.
There is an existing fire hydrant located on Kellogg Road near the intersection of Oak Meadows
Place.
Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene,
Springfield, and Lane Rural FirelRescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will
continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan.
Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup
coverage for each other's jurisdictions.
Parks and recreation - The annexation area is within the Willamalane Park and Recreation
District and will remain in the district after annexation to the city. The City of Springfield is part
of the park district and city residents receive park and recreation services from the district.
Springfield staff indicated that the district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an
adult activity center, and 31 parks containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. The
closest parks to the annexation area are Menlo Park and Eastgate Woodlands Park. Parks system
development charges will be issued for new residential develoP!Dent occurring within the
annexation area.
Schools - The area of this request is within the Springfield School District 19. Springfield staff
indicated that existing schools serving this neighborhood-Centennial elementary, Hamlin
middle, and Springfield high-will continue to serve the annexation area.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP (J7 - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 5 of9
."
,
EXHIBIT B - P7
'J
Wastewater - The existing residence is not currently connected to the city wastewater system.
Springfield staff indicates that two wastewater service lines are extended to the annexation area
from the existing 8-inch main in Kellogg Road.
Stormwater - Any future development or redevelopment of the annexation area will require
appropriate stormwater management techniques in accordance with city standards.
Streets - The annexation area is adjacent to Kellogg Road, a county road that is already inside the
Springfield city limits. The City of Springfield is recommending acquisition of right-of-way
along the annexation area's southerly boundary. Specifically, the right-of-way line along the
southern portion of the annexation area should be extended to coincide with the right.;.of-way on
the adjacent parcel to the east. This acquisition can be acquired when the annexation area is
partitioned or further developed. At that time, curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements will be
required.
Solid waste management - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the
Lane County administered landfill.
Communication facilities - Various. providers offer both wire and wireless communication
services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the
market will soon have the capability to provide service to future development in this area.
Land use controls - The property is within Springfield's portion of the UGB. Through an
intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the city already
has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The city will continue to administer land
use controls after annexation.
The minimum level of key urban facilities and services are either immediately available or can be
provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with .this
standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
The annexation proposal is consist~nt with the Metro Plan, as it is an incremental step in
implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and
policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan
community. The proposed residential use is consistent with the long-range plans for the area.
This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP (f7 - 35) - July .18, 2007
Page 6 of 9
','
EX H I B IT B - P 8
'J
Recommendation
The boundary commission staff recommends that the proposed annexation to the City of
Springfield (EC SP 07 - 35) be approved without the bearing and staff report as required by ORS
199.466.
'If a public bearing is requested, the proposal will be beard at the commission's next available
public bearing. If none. is requested, it will be approved and effective July 30, 2007 (ORS
199.466 and ORS 199.519).
###
Sign and return this fonn to the boundary commission office ONLY if you desire that a public
hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregon 97401-3111
Pursuant to QRS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A PUBUC HEARING and STAFF
STUDY be conducted on an annexation of territory to the City of Springfield (EC SP 07 - 35) as
required by ORS 199.461. This form must be filed in the commission office no later than 5:00
p.m., Julv 30.2007.
Reason for requesting public bearing:
Date
Signature
Title
Representing
Note: If you or your agency requests a public bearing, tbe commission asks that you attend the
requested bearing.
pt LCBC:LCOG: L-\BC\EXP\2007\ECSP0735 SN.DOC
Last Suv/!d: July J 8, 2007
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee sp en - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 7 of9
o~
'~
EXHIBIT B - P9
MAP No.1 VICINITY MAP
Annexation to Springfield (Nepute)
EC SP 07 - 35
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee SP07 - 35) - July 18,2007
Page 8 of 9
t:;
;~}
MAP No. SITE MAP
Annexation to Springfield (Nepute)
EC SPfJ7 - 35
2~
~34
I i
t ~
SEE loW' 17 03 Xl 33 .
., ~I
-- ---.....--- ~ ----""
~
~/:. ....' II... ,,. ,,_,.
r. J:"._....v /J.L.C "
7
;f-~--~.~ ~ z._
- - ~.-_'M 11_".,
NAI
'.-cn .~
llAME 011,1
i:; i~~..':?~!
rJ.
,
._...n;~.,,_ _ ~ ~__
ANNEXA nON AREA
Includes TL BOO, 17-03-34-22'
Owned by John Nepute '
(Ee SP 07 - 35)
.L __
~I.
1100 I.
,
Jurt:
4J I....
''''''ilI,.
3:. ~
~_ _-fl ...
lL/
lL/
0:
Iii
3500
,
;
40400
s
~
3200
.21 N:.
5000
4300
3100
-'
'~
;:!
...J
~
~ 24CO
~
~..J&~5
STREET
-"3 ' ,
,29 "']1'''U; ':""
2200 ,;; 2000 1 goo J2 .-- J3 '\..10.. 34
j !.j '. . 1800 17llO 1800
" .' '" !; :..
Ifl il -. I
-~I.'s. J I . -
-;
.,. ..~ ". .. s...... I~
. .; ~yri-n.:;
.,
..,' - :. .: ". ~
i ~ _ - -~r.:>'~''''i'"~ ~
q TAX lDTTED ON J N
:' j.-::t ~~RP-----Kq.1oC.
t -. i ~i IW' 17-03-34-21 f- u...kNllPW'
I ~... 1
:, '1. ---...,..--
I II
.. .~j:+~: '.
,)
..~
,: 3000
;F
. .-. r-...'
910' --f: 2900
;1'
· 2800
909
2& ...-....4
~2&CO
S
~
..
-
.~.;,.
-
2 ";~.,.
: 2800 ":
;. ~-' :,
...r..._ ~
17
2700
g- r ..- ~
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP CJT - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 9 of9
..1
J
EXHIBIT B - Pll
...
~
RESOLUTION NO. 07-26
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS.
WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex 1.03 acres into the City of Springfield on April 19,
2007, said territory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 36 West, Section 34, Map 22, Tax Lot 800 and more particularly described in
Exhibit A of this Resolution. '
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth
Boundary, and is adjacent to the City Limits; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) to initiate annexation upon
receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in the territory proposed to be
annexed; and,
WHEREAS, the property owners of the certain territory described in Exhibit A signed a consent to annex
(Exhibit B); and, .
WHEREAS, one registered voter resides within the territory and has signed a consent to annex (Exhibit
B); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.030(2)(a) and ORS
222.111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to.initiate annexation when the territory in the
annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum leVel of key urban facilities and services in an
orderly and efficient manner as defmed in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, page II-
.B-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities;
and
WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro
Area General Plan, page V-3 as. wastewater service,'stormwater service, solid waste management, water
service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection,.city-wide parks and recreation programs,
electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district-
wide basis; and .
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of
key urban facilities as described in Attachment 2; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request
for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City supports the applicant's request for expedited Boundary Commission processing.
~
~
EXHIBIT B - P12
'J
NOW THEREFORE BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the
annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Loclll Government Boundary
Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 34, Map 22, Tax Lot 800, and more particularly
described in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon' adoption by the Common Council of the City of
Springfield and approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed
annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and
adoption of final order required by ORS 199.461.
Section 4: The City Manager shall forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited
processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this ~ th day of June, 2007 by a vote of
-h. for and --0. against.
Council President
APPROVED by the-Mayor of the City of Springfield this ~ th day of June, 2007.
tJ~~
~or Council President
ATTEST:
CityRe~ .g~
>'. I::" ~,. ..:. r.", t i '!"- , '!
; I' . :. . ~ .'
~ O~\'LL'* J \...\"-A\~\
.. ":?-]2.:;-1 Cl
~
EXHIBIT B - P13
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Beginning at a point on the east boundary of Oak Breeze Estates as platted and recorded on file
75, slides 617 and 618 of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County Oregon, said point
being the southwest comer of lot 13, Oak Tree Subdivision as platted and recorded on file 73,
slides 781 and 782, of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County, Oregon; Thence along
the southwesterly boundary of said Oak Tree Subdivision, south 89 degrees 57' 45.0" East
173.17 feet to an angle point in the said southwesterly boundary; thence continuing along said
southwesterly boundary, and its north margin of county road No. 307 (Kellogg Street), said point
being 20.00 feet from, when measured at right angles to, the centerline of Kellogg Street;
Thence along said north margin, north 79 degrees 04' 20" west 167.88 feet to a point on the east
boundary of said Oak Breeze Estates; thence leaving said north margin, along the east boundary
of said Oak Breeze Estates, north 01 degree 16' 39" east 2436.57 feet to the point of beginning,
all in'Lane County, Oregon.
~"Ia.. ~
~ 814
,
'-. f ~ .
\ ~
815
" ,
\ ' ~ _T
:l -.,..'
~1,"5'
I ft
800
,. ~ . , ,02 N:..
!l
I ~
'.
~ . .. OU9-03
:1 I~
Site
'0....
.3500 :: 44 '''.n' \0'.11'45 10.........
. : f 3600 , 3700 . 3800
. '.
- .'.c i....,! O~9 .
1.".0'
. 10".0'
5000
4900
!
.
~
=
~
4800 4700
~
:
42 "".'101'
(
. ,
.
EXHIBIT B - P14
EXHIBIT B
CONSENT TO ANNEX
. ":
EXHIBIT B - P15
'.\
FORM #1
PETITION
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
We, the undersigned, constitute the owners of at least one-half of the land area of the property described in the
attachment marked "Exhibit A" AND
We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map is attached marked "Exhibit B," showing the
affected territory and its relationship to the present city limit boundaries.
The annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under the Boundary Commission Act and should therefore
be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study, a Final Order should be entered by the Boundary
Commission.
By ~ Date ~ .~. \11
\
By Date
By Date
By Date
~# 17-03-34-22
LOT# 800 .
~#
LOT#
With the ab~ve Sign~verifying that I have the authority to consent
to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm, agency or trust.
Revised 12128/00
5
f
.
J
..
.
Office of the Secretary of State
BILL BRADBURY
Secretary of State
EXHIBIT B - P16
Ardrlves Division
MARY BETH HERKERT
Director
800 Summer St. NE
Salem, Oregon 97310
(503) 3'73-0'701
Facsimile (503) 373-0953
September 7, 2007
Lane County Local
Government Boundary Commission
Paula L Taylor
99 East Broadway, Suite 400
Eugene OR 97401-3111
Dear Ms. Taylor:
Please be advised that we have received and filed the following Annexation(s):
Ordinance Number
EC FL 07-40 (Florence)
EC SP 07-35 (Springfield)'
EC IC 07-25 Gunctian City)
C ED 06-69 (Eugene)
Our File Number
Date
AN 2007-0292
AN 2007-0293
AN 2007-0294
AN 2007-0295
9/06/2007
9/06/2007
9/06/2007
9/06/2007
Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexations through the application of
ORS 199.519
Our assigned file number(s) are included with the above information.
Sincerely,
~__.J- B~~
Linda Bjornstad :
Official Public Documents :::
Lane County Clerk
ODOT /Highway Division
PRC/Population Research Center
Revenue Cartography Section
cc:
'-
www Server - http://arcweb,sos.state.or.us . Intemet E-mail -reference.archives@state.or.us
Oregon Genealogy Listserv - or-roots@archivel4.sos.state.or.us
I
"
EXHIBIT B - P17
&
JONES Brenda
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
TAYLOR Paula L [PTAYLOR@lcog.org}
Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:53 AM
SCOLLA Connie J; SCHULZ Stephanie E; HOPKINS Steve; JONES Brenda
Michael Kaiser
Annexation (Nepute)
No public hearing was requested on the Nepute annexation to the City of Springfield (ECSP07-35), so
the annexation is approved and effective July 30, 2007, at the end of the day.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Paula Taylor, Executive Officer
Lane County Local Government Boundaly Commission
(541) 682-4425
Fax: (541) 682-2635
1