The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 16 2009-2013 Capital Improvement Program - A Community Reinvestment Plan Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Department: Staff Contact: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: March 17,2008 Regular Session Public Works Q~ Ken V ogeney "J'\ 726-1026 5 minutes AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: 2009-20 13 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN ACTION REQUESTED: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). AFTER PUBLIC INPUT, BY MOTION, ADOPT OR REJECT THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. ISSUE STATEMENT: The City of Springfield 2009-2013 Capital Improvement Program - A Community Reinvestment Plan, has been drafted by staff, reviewed by the Planning Commission (2/05/08), and the City Council in work session (3/03/08). It is now ready for public hearing and adoption. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Draft 2009-2013 Capital Improvement Program DISCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT: The draft City of Springfield 2009-2013 Capital Improvement Program, A Community Reinvestment Plan, was reviewed at the Planning Commission's February 5, 2008 meeting. The Commission recommended Council approval of the plan. The City Council then reviewed the draft CIP in work session on March 3, 2008 and approved the ClP as drafted to be brought to public hearing at this meeting. After hearing public comments, Council is requested to adopt the Capital Improvement Program by motion. . ity.O re on ". ~ ... Capital Improvement F rogram A Communit~ R.einvestment Flan ....................... 2009-20 1 J FISCAL YEARS 2009-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN City of Springfield, Oregon Mayor: Sidney ff: Leiken Councilors: Anne Ballew Christine Lundberg Joe Pishioneri David Ralston John Woodrow Hillary Wylie Prepared by: Public Works Department February 2008 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 58 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1. TABLES Capital Improvements Review Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. i Definitions of Project Categories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Glossary of Funding Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii SECTION 2. SCHEDULES Summary of Proposed Expenditures by Project Category. . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Summary of Proposed Revenues and Expenditures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2008-09. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. vi Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2009-10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Vll Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2010-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Vlll Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2011-12. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IX Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2012-13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. x SECTION 3. PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR FUNDING Development Improvements . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I-I Justice Center Facility ....................................... II-I Neighborhood Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-I Preservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IV-l Transportation Safety & Enhancement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. V-I SECTION 4. INDEX............................................... VI ATTACHMENT A PAGE 2 OF 58 TABLE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The following criteria are used to evaluate and rank projects for listing in the CIP. In order to prioritize the use of scarce funds, these criteria are used to make sure the projects in the CIP meet the City's goals and priorities. (1) Capital improvements 'should be consistent with the Metro Plan and all other phases of City planning. (2) Projects mandated by State or Federal laws or regulations should receive high priorities. (3) Capital improvements that maximize current City investment in existing capital facilities should receive high priorities. (4) Capital improvements that allow for infilling within the existing City limits should receive high priorities. (5) The review and subsequent prioritization of capital requests should consider the initial cost, life cycle cost and the long-term impacts on the City's Operating Budget. (6) Capital projects that eliminate or reduce the potential for health hazards or increase the safety and general welfare of the City should receive high priorities. (7) Projects that take advantage of economies of scale should be emphasized. (8) Use oflocal monies as leverage to secure monies from outside funding sources should be given considerable weight in the evaluation of prioritization of capital improvements. (9) Projects that address higher Council priorities for capital improvement and maintenance should receive higher priority. (10) Projects that address special Council targets should receive higher priority. TABLE II DEFINITIONS OF PROJECT CATEGORIES The following list of categories is the means by which the CIP has been organized for review. The titles are meant to be descriptive of the primary purpose of the projects in that category. Projects may serve functions of more than one category. For example, a NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT project may also include work described under TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT or PRESERVATION PROJECTS, but will only be listed in the primary category. Additionally, projects in any category may include projects that are growth related and eligible for funding with Systems Development Charge (SDC) funds. DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS - includes projects that primarily serve specific developing commercial and industrial lands, which the City has designated for future growth in the Metro Plan, or projects that generally promote economic activity in the City. Also, they may include capacity enhancement projects such as collector or arterial street improvements or a new Fire Station. Schedule I shows this category divided into project work and debt service of previously constructed projects, financed with bonds other than general obligation bonds. JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY - consists of design and construction of the justice center facility approved by voters in 2004,/under measure 20-91. The project will be financed with general obligation bonds and will house police, court and municipal jail facilities. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS - includes the small projects primarily improving individual neighborhoods. These projects may be funded by local assessment districts, if they are projects proposed by property owners for improvement of City street facilities. PRESERVATION PROJECTS - includes projects whose primary purpose is to extend the useful life or expand the capacity of existing facilities. Usually these facilities have exceeded their life expectancies or design capacities, and needed repairs or upgrading have not been performed as time and/or growth of the community have required them. This category also includes projects that add to or modify existing facilities and do not fit into the other categories. TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT - includes projects intended primarily to improve traffic safety, relieve traffic congestion, provide additional traffic capacity, and improve traffic circulation. ii <; TABLE III GLOSSARY OF FUNDING SOURCES ASSESSMENTS CURRENT REVENUES CR-SDC (OLD) CR-SDC TRANS, Improvement CR-SDC TRANS, Reimbursement CR-SDC SAN, Improvement CR-SDC SAN, Reimbursement CR-SDC STORM CR - Wastewater User CR-Drainage User CR-STREET BOOTH KELLY RESERVE GRANTS AND DONA nONS FG-CDBG FG-STp1 FG-EDA FG-UNDETER SG-ODOT1 LG-LC1 OTHER REVENUE BOND CAPITAL BOND DEVELOPER OTHER Assessments on benefitting properties. SDC funds collected under SDC laws in effect prior to 1991 which have different restrictions on use than current SDCs. SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the transportation system. SDC funds collected from development to reimburse for existing transportation system capacity used by the development. SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system. SDC funds collected from development to reimburse for existing capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system used by the development. SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the storm drainage collection system. Sewer user fees for sanitary sewer expansion, extension, and repair. Sewer user fees for drainage system expansion, extension, and repair. Funds received from State and local fuel taxes, from Lane County (urban transition), and other sources to be used for road purposes. Funds received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center. Community Development Block Grant Federal Surface Transportation Program Federal Economic Development Assistance As yet unidentified Federal Grant Oregon Department of Transportation Lane County Road Fund Long-term obligation secured by ongoing revenues such as Sewer User fees General Obligation Debt issued with approval of the voters Direct contributions from developers Undefined funding source 1 These funds may not pass through the City budget. iii SCHEDULE I 2009 TO 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY -0)> Il) ~ lOll) CD 0 Q):::T o~ -:;J 0'1- co)> I'j;:,:':::: , ..,..... . .."",,,,,,,,,,,,,,. iF' . , I 2009-2010. 201()~201tC" "C 2011;.2012' '2012-2013 .'..,' -",m, ,,; CATEGORY,,;..' . " 20QQ-2009 TOTAL '" .' .... . ..... . '.' DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 783,700 5,632,650 8,073,000 648,000 924,000 16,061,350 DEBT SERVICES 718,000 718,000 718,000 718,000 423,000 3,295,000 JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY 25,000 25,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 405,000 260,000 310,000 10,000 10,000 995,000 PRESERVATION 3,749,000 2,525,000 2,125,000 2,602,000 2,435,000 13,436,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT 800,000 575,000 902,000 340,000 375,000 2,992,000 TOTAL 6,480,700 9,710,650 12,128,000 4,318,000 4,167,000 36,804,350 Pageiv Last Update 3/4/2008 9:20 AM SCHEDULE" 2009 TO 2013 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 1~ ~ n ...~ Q~ ",- ..,. 1~,m_U~OO,~-09~~P~N ' "2011'~3~ 'REbENU~, .... . .. ....:. EX ASSESSMENTS I I 0 I 0 I Ii 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 01 0 0 CURRENT REVENUES SDC (OLD) 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SDC (TRANS IMPROV) 441 50 300 150 000 199 125 100 000 588 000 100 000 812 000 100 000 695 000 100 000 105 000 3 600 300 3 599 125 515 SDC (TRANS REIMBUR) 446 154 950 300 000 453 300 200 000 190915 150,000 152 325 125 000 109325 100000 123 325 1 029 950 1 029 250 100 SDC (SANITARY IMPROV) 443 55 000 50 000 53 000 25 000 15 000 25 000 20 000 25 000 25 000 25 000 30 000 205 000 203 000 2000 SDC (SANITARY REIMBUR) 442 60 350 200 000 186 325 150 000 211 325 150,000 162 325 150 000 150 325 100 000 99 325 810350 809 625 125 SDC (STORM) 440 140300 500 000 691 350 500 000 941 350 500 000 592,350 500,000 502 350 200 000 200 350 2 940 300 2 939 150 550 DRAINAGE CAPITAL 425 500 181 000 118000 321 000 390 000 380 000 380 000 351,000 348 000 398 000 401 000 2 243 500 2 243 000 500 WASTEWATER CAPITAL 409 129 2,100,000 2 058 000 2,100000 2 138 000 2 100,000 2,104,000 2 100,000 2,088000 2,090 000 2 102 000 10490129 10490,000 129 STREET CAPITAL 434 200,000 0 200,000 400 000 310 000 200 000 230,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 200 000 1 100000 1100,000 0 BOOTH-KELLY RESERVE 618 1 858,855 0 450 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 858 855 450 000 1,408 855 Sub-totals: 3 120,984 4,681 000 5615100 4 396 000 4910650 4 205 000 4 453 000 4 051 000 4018000 3813000 3 861 000 24 218 984 22 864 350 1,4146341 GRANTS & DONATIONS CDBG" 210 LANE COUNTY' 420 ODOT' 420 FEDERAL GRANT' 420 0 0 0 WILLAMALANE 420 0 Sub-totals: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER CAPITAL BOND 426 25 000 25 000 0 0 0 0 25 000 25 000 0 UNKNOWN SOURCE 840 000 640 000 4 600 000 4 600 000 1 500 000 1 500 000 300 000 300 000 300 000 300 000 13340000 13340000 0 OTHER 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEVELOPER 420 200 000 200 000 200 000 200 000 115 000 115 000 0 0 0 0 515 000 515 000 0 Sub-totals: 0 865 000 865 000 4 800 000 4 800 000 1 615 000 1 615 000 0 0 300 000 300 000 13940000 13940000 0 Grand Totals: 3,120,984 5,552,000 6,480,100 9,196,000 9,110,650 11,880,000 12,128,000 4,351,000 4,318,000 4,113,000 4,161,000 38,218,984 38,804,350 1,414,634 "'These funds may not pass through the City's budget. ....Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not included. Page v Last Updata 3/412008 9:20 M1 SCHEDULE 11/ - A PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 -u:>> Ill" <elll l1> 0 ",=>- Q~ ",- "':>> ~t'GE'I....",m.'i:iii..i~:~ SDC"" Ll SDC TRANSPORTATION, 1'''''/ SDC SANITARY .........1 'SDC ~NAGE W~~~~1fII\T~~ ~,!RE~I :1 OTHE~.,,< ,:, . ~,~OJECT '.No.,., .., ,< '. OLD" IIMPROVMT"I'REIMBlJ~S L '. IMPROVMT REIMBURS_I ... STORM PITAL CAPITAl"'"'' .'CAPITAl' P" TOTAl;:'I' DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1,501,100 I----- 1-1 Debt Service - SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 t--- 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 53,000 25,000 558,000 636,000 I----- 1-3 City Participation, Private Projects 40,100 14,300 2,000 125,000 15,000 251,000 t--- 1-4 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 I----- 1-6 Gray-Jaqua Agreement 50,000 10,000 125,000 245,000 t--- 1-1 Jasper Road Sewer Extension 104,000 104,000 - 1-8 Bob Straub IGA 152,100 152,100 CAPITAL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 25,000 u=1l Justice Center Facility I I Bond- 25,000 25,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 405,000 - Transportallon Demand Project 11/-1 50,000 50,000 - 11/-3 68th & "D" Street Drainage 155,000 155,000 - 11I-4 South 59th & Aster Street Drainage 150,000 150,000 - 111-5 South 61th And Ivy Street Drainage 50,000 50,000 PRESERVATION Category Total 3,149,000 - IV-1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 1,246,000 1,246,000 II----- 1V-3 Metro Waterways Study 100,000 100,000 It--- IV-4 Drainage Repair 150,000 150,000 II----- 1V-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 t--- 1V-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 25,000 I----- 1V-1 Riparian Land ManagmllAcquislllons 31,000 13,000 50,000 t--- 1V-8 Millrace Water Control Structure 50,000 50,000 r--w=s Street L1ghtln-FII//Pole Replacement 25,000 25,000 I----- 1V-10 Street Seal/OVerlay 288,000 125,000 413,000 t--- 1V-11 Woodstave Removal 50,000 50,000 I----- 1V-12 BK Building Removal Booth Kelly Fund ---... 50,000 50,000 t--- 1V-13 Building Maintenance Projects Unknown ... 600,000 500,000 I----- 1V-15 Mill Race Interim Pump 220,000 220,000 t--- IV-16 "A" Street Overlay 10,000 10,000 I-- 1V.11 Springfield Depot Repairs Unknown -to- 40,000 40,000 t--- Booth Kelly Fundj->" 1V-18 BK Internal Structural Improvements 100,000 100,000 I-- 1V-19 BK Roof Repair Booth Kelly Fun~ 300,000 300,001 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 800,000 I----- Traffic Control Projects V-1 100,000 100,00 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 250,000 250,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 - V-4 Bellllne/Gateway Intersection Developer- 200,000 200,000 - V-6 Pioneer Parkway LIghting 69,000 81,000 50,000 200,000 SCHEDULE III - A TOTAL! O( 199,125 453,300 53,000 186,3251 691,350 118,000 2,058,000 200,OOOL 1,315,000 6,460,100 Page vi Last Update 3/412008 9,20 AM SCHEDULE III - B PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 ~~ lD D> '" g. <03 OD> -::l ",- CX>)> P~G~~.. SDC '. L .... SDC TRANSPORTA:rION ::~'II~~~~V;i'CSA:I;I:;YURS~. im.S 1-.D~~i1~E,i, WATEWATER 1:.llli:'~i~EET ~Tu"'n PRO~ CAPITAL:iiiL .. PIT~.L . "....,.-..,:..:: No.' ' ""':OLD' IMPROVMr REIMBURS TOT DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 6,350,650 I-- 1-1 D9bt Service - SLI Infrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 f--- 1-2 Debt Service. Sewer Interceptor 23,000 613,000 636,000 I-- 1-3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 38,650 50,000 15,000 50,000 25,000 288,650 I-- 1-4 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 - 844,OOC 1-5 Future Growth Projects 18,000 140,000 52,000 12,000 310,000 . 52,000 30,000 50,000 - 415,OOC 1-6 Gray-Jaqua Agreement 50,000 125,000 300,000 - 1.1 Jasper Road Sewer Extension Unknown f.+ 4,000,000 4,000,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 260,000 - 11I-1 Transportation Demand Project 10,000 10,000 - 11I-2 S& T St Drainage 100,000 100,000 - 11I-4 South 59th & Aster Street Drainage 150,000 150,000 PRESERVATION Category Total 2,SI - IV-1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 - IV.2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 1,020,000 1,020,000 - IV-3 Metro Waterways Study 0 - IV-4 Drainage Repair 60,000 140,000 200,000 - IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 - 25,OOC IV-6 MS4 Permit Re<<:luirements 25,000 - 13,000 50,000 IV-1 Riparian Land ManagmtJAcquisltlons 31,000 - 25,000 IV-9 Street Light In-fiIl/Pole Replacement 25,000 - IV-10 Street Seal/Overlay 0 - / IV-11 Woodstave Removal 50,000 50,000 - - IV-13 Building Maintenance Projects Unknown 600,000 600,000 - IV-14 21 st Street Reconstruction 0 - IV-16 "A" Street Overlay 295,000 295,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT . Category Total 515,000 - V-1 Traffic Control Projects 15,000 15,000 I-- V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 250,000 250,000 f-- V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 f--- V-4 BeltlinelGateway Intersection Developer_ 200,000 200,000 f--- V-6 Pioneer Parkway lighting 0 SCHEDULE III . B TOTAL 01 588,000 I 190,9751 15,000 211,3251 941,350 I 390,000 2,138,0001 310,000 4,800,~ Page vii Last Update 3/4/2008 9,20 AM SCHEDULE III . C PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-11 ~?; "'Ill CD 0 ~::T 03 OCD -'" g;; PA~Eliiii. '.' ",'c>> '. ~~OJE(;TSi: "':i~i)((: .SDC SDC TRANSPORTATION'!> ". SDC SANITARY zp:S~~~m:II;IW:'i~ff;I~~G~' " VVATEWATER" . STREET .nn.n:D"'" PROJECT' ..,., ...~i>) ')):":.i.' '::'. . I /,';-:" ..,>"",. 'No>' ....:........"........ i...... ." OLD IMPROVMT ..' REIMBURSIMPROVMT REIMBURS TO PITAL CAPITAL CAPITAL TOtAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 8,191,000 - 1.1 Debt Service. SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service. Sewer Interceptor 636,000 636,000 - 1.3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 15,000 50,000 25,000 320,000 - 1-4 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 - 1-5 Future Growth Projects 100,000 32,000 396,000 528,001 f---- 1-1 Jasper Road Sewer Extension Unknown - 1,200,000 1,200,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 310,000 ~ Transportation Demand Project 10,0001 1 10,000 11I.2 S& T St Drainage I I 300,000 I 300,001 PRESERVATION Category Total 2,125,000 f--- IV.1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 3,000 191,000 200,000 f--- IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 10,000 850,000 920,000 r--- IV.3 Metro Waterways Study 0 f--- IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 - IV.5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 - IV-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 25,001 - IV-1 Riparian Land ManagmtlAcquisitions 31,000 13,000 50,001 - IV.9 Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement 25,000 25,000 - IV-10 Street Seal/Overlay 90,000 105,000 195,000 - IV-11 Woodstave Removal 50,000 50,000 - IV.13 Building Maintenance Projects Unknown - 300,000 300,000 - IV-14 21 st Street Reconstruction 100,000 100,000 ...m... .... " ...." ........, ., ..... .... .. . ... ..... .... .... .,.,.. . . ." ~ m . .. .............."... ...........,...= ..... ... .. .. TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 902,000 - V-1 Traffic Control Projects 15,000 15,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 242,000 \ 242,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 - 50,000 - i- V-5 S 48th St Connection Main to Daisy 360,000 Developer 115,000 535,000 SCHEDULE III . C TOTAL 01 812,000 152,3251 20,0001 162,325 592,350 380,0001 2,104,000 230,000 1,615,000 12,128,000 Page viii Last Update 3/4/2008 9:20 AM SCHEDULE III - D PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011.12 ~~ 10m '" n ~::T ~3 0'" -::> g;; PAGEI::<ii::!imROJECTS":~I:".",C SDCTRANSPORTATION :,l" SDCSANITARY ::i:idiii:i~i.,i~~~~M.i:I:i!', .. ""DRAINAGE'''' :~I\TEWATER ".~T~.E~T ::i:I!:F",..}?IP~~~1~T: , ,. ,No. " ,IMPROVMT'" REIMBURS; IMPROVMT REIMBURS " CAPITAL'.."'" CAPITAL.",'" CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1,386,000 I-- 1.1 Debt Service - SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 82,000 I-- 1.2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 20,000 616,000 636,000 f--- 1.3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 5,000 50,000 15,000 50,000 25,000 255,000 I-- 1-4 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 - 1-5 Future Growth Projects 58,000 310,000 368,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS , Category Total 10,000 I"-1l Transportation Demand Project 10,000 I I I I 10,000 PRESERVATION Category Total 2,602,000 - IV.1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 3,000 191,000 200,000 - IV.2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 1,250,000 1,250,000 - IV.3 Metro Waterways Study 0 - IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 - IV.5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 - 25,OOC IV-6 MS4 Permit Requirements 25,000 - 50,OOC IV-1 Riparian Land ManagmtlAcquisitions 31,000 13,000 - IV-9 Street LIght In-fill/Pole Replacement 45,000 45,000 - IV-10 Street SeallOverlay 91,000 55,000 152,000 - IV.11 Wood stave Removal 50,000 50,OOC - IV.13 Building Maintenance Projects Unknown -+ 300,000 300,000 - 210,000 IV-14 21 st Street Reconstruction 210,000 . TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 340,000 - V-1 Traffic Control Projects 15,000 15,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 215,000 215,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 SCHEDULE III . D TOTAL I 0 695,0001 109,325 25,0001 150,3251 502,350 348,000 I 2,088,000 100,0001 300,000 I ~ Page Ix Last Update 3/4/2008 9,20 AM SCHEDULE 11/ . E PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 d?'e lQ- (1) Dl o ~ :T "'3 0(1) -" ~; Pe~Elm"'~ PROJ~' SDC l'mSDC TRANSPORTATION .""'1,,'" 'SDCSANITARY.''''''t I INAGE \'iATEWATERI"" ,STRE,E! ' il...".,8THER """~ECT.,,... m,' ,'" ,', ".."'"",,,', , ','IIMPROVMT" ..IREIMBU~SX ,',No,' ""',. ",', ,",,'," .'.' "",;;,;; ,.." I "OLD 'REIMBURS '", IMPROVMT PITAL "CAPITAL CAPITAL '." TAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 1,341,000 - 1.1 Debt Service. SLllnfrastructure 12,325 39,325 30,350 . , 82,000 - 1-2 Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor 341,000 341,000 - 1-3 City Participation, Private Projects 50,000 30,000 50,000 15,000 50,000 25,000 280,000 - 1-4 Franklin Blvd Plan 25,000 25,000 - 1.5 Future Growth Projects . 245,000 11,000 1,000 8,000 59,000 289,000 619,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Category Total 10,000 ---m=1l Transportation Demand Project 10,000 T 1 I 10,000 PRESERVATION Category Total 2,435,000 f- IV.1 Sanitary Sewer Repair 3,000 191,000 200,000 I---- IV-2 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement 1,250,000 1,250,000 I- IV-4 Drainage Repair 50,000 150,000 200,000 I- IV-5 Channel Improvement 60,000 60,000 I--- IV-6 MS4 Pennit Requirements 25,000 25,001 I- IV.7 Riparian Land ManagmtJAcquisitions 31,000 13,000 50,001 I- IV-9 Street Light In.fiIl/Pole Replacement 40,000 40,000 - IV.10 Street Seal/Over1ay 100,000 160,000 260,000 - IV-11 Woodstave Removal 50,000 50,OOC - IV-13 Building Maintenance Projects Unknown ~ 300,000 300,000 - ( IV-14 21 st Street Reconstruction TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT Category Total 31 - V.1 Traffic Control Projects 15,000 15,000 - V-2 Gateway Traffic Improvements 250,000 250,000 - V-3 Intelligent Transport System 50,000 50,000 SCHEDULE III . E TOTAL 0 105,000 I 123,325 30,000 I 99,3251 200,3501 401,000 2,102,0001 200,000 300,000 4,161,000 Page x Last Update 3/4/2008 9:20 AM "U~ Q) ::::: lOQ) CD 0 ....>,::T (.0.)3 o CD _:::l 01- (X)~ DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $410,000 Total Cost Street & Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""U}> OJ ::to 10 OJ eD 0 ->. :::r .J>o.3 OeD -.,:3 g:): PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 , 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other (Debt) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 410,000 , TOTAL $ - $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 410,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Sanitary, Reimbursement $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 39,325 $ 196,625 SDC Storm $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 30,350 $ 151,750 SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 12,325 $ 61,625 TOTAL $ - $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 410,000 Project Description: Oregon Special Public Works payment on a Joan for a portion of the public improvements in the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park. The total loan amount is $952,309 and is to be paid over a 20 year period. The last payment will be in 2014. Justification: The loan and repayment of the loan was approved by Council in 1994. Maintenance Impacts: No maintenance impact related to the debt service. Page / - 1 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $2,885,000.00 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0)> III ::I: 1C III lD (') ..... :::r 013 OlD -~ g:)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other (Debt) $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 341,000 $ 2,885,000 TOTAL $ - $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 341,000 $ 2,885,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Sanitary, Improvement $ 53,000 $ 23,000 $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ 96,000 SDC Sanitary, Reimbursement $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Drainage User $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater User $ 558,000 $ 613,000 $ 636,000 $ 616,000 $ 341,000 $ 2,764,000 TOTAL $ - $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 636,000 $ 341,000 $ 2,885,000 Project Description: Annual payment of 20 year revenue bonds and State Revolving Fund loan to fund the South Springfield Interceptor. Last Payment Date: Phase I 2/1/2014 Phase II 12/1/2015 Phase III 7/1/2011 A portion of the South Springfield Interceptor sewer was funded with loans and bonds amortized over a 20 year period. The SRF loan of $1,075,000 for Phase 1 resulted in an annual payment of $75,000. In Phase II, the $3.3 million revenue bond sold in 1995 resulted in an annual payment of $285,000. The payment on the $2,900,000 DEQ Revolving Loan for Phase III in FY 1997/98 equals $300,000 per year. " Relation to Plans: Consideration of the bond repayment was anticipated when setting the current sewer user rates. All loans and bonds were approved by Council. Maintenance Impacts: No maintenance impact related to the debt service. Page I - 2 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category City Participation, Private Projects Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,400,650 Total Cost Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "'0)> I1l ::I: to I1l lD 0 ..... ::r 0>3 OlD _::J ..... g;)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 257,000 $ 288,650 $ 320,000 $ 255,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,650 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 257,000 $ 288,650 $ 320,000 $ 255,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,650 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 14,300 $ 38,650 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 102,950 SDC Trans, Improvement $ 40,700 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 240,700 SDC San, Reimbursement $ 2,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 202,000 SDC San, Improvement $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 5,000 $ 30,000 $ 55,000 SDC Storm $ 125,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 425,000 Drainage Capital $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 275,000 Wastewater Capital $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL $ - $ 257,000 $ 288,650 $ 320,000 $ 255,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,650 Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City's Construction Permit process. It is necessary to budget $200,000 in each program (Transportation, Sanitary and Storm) and the programmed funds for FY09 are only those necessary to meet that need. Currently other programmed funds are not yet tied to specific projects. Justification: In many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage andlor streets beyond a size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid by the City under Council adopted participation policies. Relation to Plans: City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance impacts are dependent on the individual projects funded. Often this funding is used to upsize a sewer or storm drainage line and sometimes to improve a street's structure and length and the maintenance impacts are minimal. Page 1 - 3 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM Transportation Manager Project Manager ' Development Improvement Project Category Franklin Blvd Plannning Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $450,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "'U~ III ::t lC III CD 0 ...... ~ "'3 OCD .....:J - ~~ PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 325,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 325,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Funding Source(s) SDC-Trans, Improvement $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 SDC-Trans, Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - STP-U $ 225,000 $ - $ - LTD $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 325,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Project Description: Complete a planning study to determine future improvements to Franklin Boulevard and the McVay/Franklin intersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional traffic. Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, access, and intersections. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and anticipates redevelopment by the Springfield Economic Development Agency. Relation to Plans: TransPlan future project list for urban standards and intersection improvements. Council top priority. Maintenance Impacts: This is an ODOT Highway and if the road stays in State ownership the impact of improvement on City maintenance could be minimal. If the State does not take responsibility for street amenities outside the curbs, then improvements to landscaping, sidewalks, etc. may need to be maintained by the City. The proposed funding is for planning and has no direct maintenance impact. Maintenance considerations need to be included in the planning process. Page / - 4 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Future Growth Projects Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $2,359,000 Total Cost Street & Sewer Capital Project Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""lJ)> III ::+ 10 III CD 0 -" ~ 0>3 OCD -.,:::J -- g:)> ....KIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ 844,000 $ 528,000 $ 368,000 $ 619,000 $ 2,359,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 844,000 $ 528,000 $ 368,000 $ 619,000 $ 2,359,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ - $ 78,000 $ - $ - $ 245,000 $ 323,000 SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ 151,000 SDC Sanitary Reimbursement $ 72,000 $ 58,000 $ 7,000 $ 137,000 SDC Sanitary Improvement $ 52,000 $ 52,000 Street Capital $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 SDC Storm $ - $ 370,000 $ 100,000 $ 310,000 $ 8,000 $ 788,000 Drainage Capital $ - $ 52,000 $ 32,000 $ - $ 59,000 $ 143,000 Wastewater Capital $ - $ 30,000 $ 396,000 $ - $ 289,000 $ 715,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 844,000 $ 528,000 $ 368,000 $ 619,000 $ 2,359,000 Project Description: The amounts of funding listed each year represent the unprogrammed funds based on revenue projections over the 5 year CIP period. These funds will be programmed to specific projects as they are identified and as project budgets are refined. Justification: State law regulates the way cities can expend SDC funds and requires that the funds be expended only on projects listed on the SDC-eligible project list. Relation to Plans: This funding is not programmed, but can be used for growth-related projects identified in the Council adopted System Development Charge project list. The projects can be programmed as development pressures increase infrastructure needs in various areas of the City or to jump-start development in selected opportunity areas. Maintenance Impacts: The projects to be funded with this unprogrammed revenue have not been selected. Typically, this funding is to provide new infrastructure to support growth and new infrastructure always has a maintenance impact. Page I - 5 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Gray Jaqua Agreement Project Title $1,150,000 Total Cost N/A Street, Sewer, Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number "0)> D> ::+ co D> CD 0 ..... ::T co3 OCD .....:J ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 430,000 $ 245,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 720,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 430,000 $ 245,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 720,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Transprotation Improv ~ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Drainage Capital $ 178,500 $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 SDC Storm / $ 71,500 $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 SDC Sanitary Reimbursement $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ 70,000 Wastewater Capital $ 130,000 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 TOTAL $ 430,000 $ 245,000 $ 475,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 720,000 Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed pursuant to the Pre-Development Agreement for the Gray-Jaqua Property located at S. 75th and Main Streets. 1'<0. lI.P. e..e3 Justification: An agreement with Heritage Park, LLC was made in 2005 for development of 215 acres. The agreement would establish the City's participation at a total of $1,150,009 for off-site and/or contiguous sewer and drainage improvements, and 1/6th of the cost of transportation improvements in Main Street. GIl~Y JAQUA ENl Relation to Plans: Pending agreement with Developer. Per the Agreement, the City's share of the funding would be fully programmed by FY2009/201 O. Maintenance Impacts: Sewer and drainage improvements would be maintained by the City. Since Main Street is an ODOT facility, the impact of the street improvements on City maintenance costs should be minimal. Page' - 6 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM Page / - 7 City Engineer Project Manager Development Improvement Project Category $ 11,304,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Sewer Extension, Jasper Road Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet P20353 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIA TrONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 Design and Engineering $ - $ 104,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,104,000 Construction $ - $ - $ 2,600,000 $ 7,200,000 $ - $ - $ 9,800,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 104,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 7,200,000 $ - $ - $ 11,304,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Sanitary Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDC Sanitary Improvement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Capital $ - $ ,104,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 104,000 Developer $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Unknown $ - $ 4,000,000 $ 7,200,000 $ - $ - $ 11,200,000 TOTAL $ - $ 104,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 7,200,000 $ - $ - $ 11,304,000 "'0)> Il) :+ lOll! CD 0 N:::T 03 OCD -.,::J 8l; Project Description: Installation of 18,000 feet of 27- to 10-inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from 42nd Street to Natron and the urban growth boundary. The City is planning on borrowing the total of the project cost and collectin the developer share through agreements and reimbursements upon connection to the system. Justification: The Jasper sewer extension project will provide sewer service to areas of the urban fringe which are currently not serviced. The Jasper Road Extension project from 57th and Main Street to Brand S Road and proposals for residential and industrial development in this area will stimulate the need for sewers. 100% of project costs are proposed to be funded with City funds, with an estimated 50% to be reimbursed to the City by grants, developer contributions, or assessments. Decommissioning of two existing pump stations is included in this project Given recent developments of the Bob Straub Parkway, it is a priority to have service to the area by June 2010. / ~\4~~~L '-, \ Relation to Plans: Springfield Sanitary Sewer Master Plan (update is expected to be complete by the end of FY07). Furthers the Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the high priority target of Jasper Natron development Maintenance Impacts: Sewer system expansion will cause additional maintenance impact Decommissioning the 2 pump stations will reduce maintenance and power costs. Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM City Engineer Project Manager Devlopment Improvement Project Category Bob Straub IGA wI Lane County Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $532,500 Total Cost Street, Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ~'J> 10::+ <D 0 ",:r ....3 O~ .... ..... 01'J> ()) PRIOR Costs APPROPRIA liONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - Construction $ 379,800 $ 152,700 $ - $ 152,700 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 379,800 $ 152,700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 152,700 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 344,800 $ 152,700 $ - $ 152,700 SDC Storm $ 35,000 $ - $ - TOTAL $ 379,800 $ 152,700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 152,700 Project Description: This funding is set aside as part of an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County to upsize some of the storm drainage structures and install additional conduit for future transportation needs. It also allows for some extra paving to accommodate future intersections. The IGA is being finalized with Lane County and will be brought to the City Council for approval later this year. Justification: The addition of this work to that already scheduled by Lane County will better facilitate future growth in the Jasper/Natron area while avoiding major reconfigurations later. Relation to Plans: Furthers the Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the high priority target of Jasper Natron development. Maintenance Impacts: This work should have minimal impacts on future maintenance, but should allow for growth without major reconfigurations. Page I - 8 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM "'0)> OJ ::+ (Q OJ CD 0 I\.):::T 1\.)3 o CD _:J (]1...... 0))> JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY Assistant City Manager Project Manager Justice Center Facility Project Category $28,249,650 Total Cost N/A Budget Subprogram Justice Center Facility Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet P50434 Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 100,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Construction $ 24,065,136 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 1,283,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL '$ 25,448,136 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Funding Source(s) Bond Measure 20-91 $ 25,448,136 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 25448136 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25 000 ""0):- III ::+ lC III co 0 N::T (.)3 Oco ....:J g:; Project Description: This project includes the construction of a replacement facility for the Police Department, Municipal Court and City Prosecutor's Office and jail facility. Construction is expected to start in the in Spring 2007. Justification: This facility will provide updated space for Police Department patrol, investigation, dispatch, record keeping and administration. It will also house municipal court, prosecutor and jail functions, and provide a public meeting space. The current facilities are outdated and do not meet current needs. Relation to Plans: Conforms to Council initiated bond measure 20-91, in November 2004. Maintenance Impacts: When completed, the facility will be maintained by the City. During the design process, decisions will made in consideration of both initial construction cost and ongoing maintenance costs. Page II - 1 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:22 AM "0)> Q)...... (Om CD () rv::T ./:>.3 o CD _:J 01...... (0)> NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Transportation Manager Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category Transportation Demand Project Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $250,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0)> Ill:::: lC III lD 0 N::T 013 OlD -;:!. ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 Construction $ 90,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,000 Other $ 60,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 160,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 90,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 160,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 90,000 TOTAL $ 160,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 90,000 Project Description: This project covers the Commuter Solutions Program local match, and partnering on transportation options projects in the Gateway area to address congestion. The project also includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-auto travel links in the community like the 60th and "E" Street multi-use path and park and ride facilities coordinated with transit stations. Justification: TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM), or 'transportation options' policies and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessary to meet those requirements. Relation to Plans: TDM Goal, policies and projects in TransPlan. Maintenance Impacts: Reduces road maintenance costs by reducing vehicle miles traveled. Some minor maintenance costs will be associated with the construction of separate multi-use paths. Page 11/ - 1 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:23 AM City Engineer Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category S & T Street Drainage Between 10th & Debra Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $400,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0)> 11>::+ 1C II> <1l 0 J\)-:J 0>3 O<1l _:J - ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 Construction $ - $ 25,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 325,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 400,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Storm $ - $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 400,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 400,000 Project Description: Construction of a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along T and S Streets between 10th and Debra Streets. The Draft Stormwater Master Plan expands upon the original Channel 6 report. When the Stormwater Master Plan is adopted the expanded description will be included in the CIP, along with updated costs. Justification: Will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the S Street area. Relation to Plans: This drainage system was identified as undersized in the SCS Channel No.6 report. , " ---/--- l/":- " " '-, Ji ~ ____ v> '" .., III "~ ~ ~ ~. j< _~_ ___~ :-~.----.-.r, . " < Maintenance Impacts: Construction of this facility will add some maintenance effort and cost, but should reduce some expenditures related to existing localized flooding. -r--;~"'!":" " Page 111 - 2 Last Update 3/412008 9:23 AM City Engineer Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category 68th & "0" Street Drainage Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $155,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number J?}> l.C:+ CD 0 ~::J" .......3 O~ .... ...... ~}> Ibts t"'KIUK APPROPRIATIONS 2007 -2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 3p,000 $ 30,000 Construction $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 Funding Source(s) CR-SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ - CR-SDC Trans, Improvement $ - CR-SDC San, Reimbursement $ - CR-SDC San, Improvement $ - CR-SDC Storm $ 155,000 $ 155,000 CR-Drainage User $ - $ - CR-Wastewater User $ - $ - $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 Project Description: Construct 900 to 1000 feet of new storm pipe and disconnect the 68th and "0" Street inlets from the 60 inch pipe in the 69th Street drainage channel. Currently the pipe connecting the inlets is flat and causes localized flooding of the 68th and "0" Street intersection during winter rain storms. Justification: During the winter months, the 69th Street channel carries a high volume of storm water which causes a backflow problem at the 68th and "0" Street inlets due to the configuration at which the pipes outfall to the open channel. Relation to Plans: Maintenance Impacts: Construction of this new facility will reduce significant maintenance efforts associated with localized flooding and add a minor amount of effort and cost to maintain the new pipe section. Page 11/ - 3 Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:23 AM City Engineer Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category South 59th and Aster Drainage Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $ 300,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number ~)> lO~ CD 0 ",:::T co3 O~ - ... 0'1)> co PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 Design and Engineering $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 Construction $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Other $ 30; 000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 TOTAL $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Funding Source(s) CR-SDC Storm $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 300,000 CR-Draiilage User $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 150 000 $ 150 000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300 000 Project Description: Install 350 feet of 42 inch storm sewer in the area of South 59th Street and Aster Street. Justification: This project will complete a piped storm system for the Mountaingate area drainage. The current system now consists of a piped system in the unimproved Aster Street Right-of-Way that outfalls into a open ditch in a wetland area. The wetland then drains back into a piped system. The open ditch does not have the capacity to convey storm water from large rain events creating a flooding situation over South 59 Street and In adjoining properties. ~ -en "'-.-J""-' , '1""-", ,- -_....~ ----.-.-.-- Mi..,"'" Relation to Plans: Provides trunk drainage service to developed and undeveloped areas. Maintenance Impacts: Construction of this new facility will reduce significant maintenance efforts associated with localized flooding and add minor amount of effort and cost to maintain this pipe section. I / / ,.}jj), .,.// 4~i!Y- r , ,I I -~- Page 111- 4 Last Updated 3/412008 9:23 AM Page 11/ - 5 City Engineer/Maintenance Manager Project Manager Neighborhood Improvements Project Category South 67th And Ivy Drainage Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $ 50,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram S. 67th & Ivy Drainage Improvement Project Number -0)> ~~ CD 0 ",:::T CD3 O~ .... - 0'1)> co PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 Construction $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Funding Source(s) CR-SDC Storm $ 50,000 $ 50,000 CR-Drainage User $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 50 000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50 000 Project Description: Install 300 feet of 8 inch storm sewer under the Ivy Street sidewalk between South 67th and South 68th Street. Connect this 8 inch pipe to the existing storm system in Ivy Street. Connect the residential storm laterals and down spouts to this 8 inch pipe. !ii t-- _...__I______~- \\ /-----.--/ /-------,-,/ I t ------\..___1 /1- I I;: I D,r-.----.I (/)!.. /~~ co I / liE 1 -- I Justification: .\'l ,I I co /-7 This project corrects. a .proble~ati~ stormwat~r d.rainage condition in the area of South 67th and Ivy Street. D D -;'V;~i L ---..--L.....l,.___.. j:: I '. _l Storm water from eXisting residential homes IS directed onto Ivy Street through curb weep holes. Ivy Street '. .'-.. __ is a shed design and the water fans out onto and across the roadway. During freezing weather icing occurs I I :. IVY ST ;;::::::::"y hazamo", onndmoos foe mmo",ffi approach;ng fhe ;nle~on of Soolli 67th and Ivy ~~ll~ 6 .~~ a J~-~ --[I . Drainag~_Im~Ove _~j Maintenance Impacts: Construction of this new facility will significantly reduce maintenance efforts associated with sanding Ivy Street and add minor amount of effort and cost to maintain this pipe section. Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:23 AM "U)> Q) :+ (0 Q) CD () w:::r 03 o CD _:J 01- (0)> PRESERVATION PROJECTS City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Sanitary Sewer Repair Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,540,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0)> III ~ 10 III CD n w::T -""3 OCD ....::J ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 100,000 Construction $ 520,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 900,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 540,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Funding Source(s) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Capital $ 395,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 197,000 $ 197,000 $ 197,000 $ 891,000 SDC San, Reimbursement $ 145,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 109,000 TOTAL $ 540,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000 Project Description: This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers other than those being rehabilitated under the formal Wet Weather Flow Management Plan being done in cooperation with MWMC (see sheet IV-2). Justification: The project will repair and/or replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life or is otherwise causing problems within the collection system. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Relation to Plans: The projects selected will be chosen not only to remove infiltration and inflow, but to replace aging lines which cause maintenance or other problems. Maintenance Impacts: The amount of funding available for repair and replacement of sanitary sewers in this program and within the Wet Weather Flow Management program will keep the system in a steady state of repair. However, we have an aging sewer system infrastructure and the overall condition of the system is not expected to improve significantly with this level of funding. Therefore, these programs help keep maintenance needs for the existing system static, while expansion of the system causes an added maintenance impact. Page IV - 1 Last Update 3/4/20089:26 AM City Engineer Project Manager Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Preservation Project Category $7,341,000 Total Cost Sewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "0)>- III ~ lC III CD 0 w~ 1\.>3 OCD -~ g;)>- PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 80,000 $ 125,000 $ 100,000 $ 70,000 $ 90,000 $ 125,000 $ 510,000 Construction $ 1,575,000 $ 1,121,000 $ 920,000 $ 850,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,125,000 $ 5,176,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 1,655,000 $ 1,246,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 920,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,686,000 Funding Source(s) SDC San, Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ 70,000 Drainage Capital $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Wastewater Capital $ 1,655,000 $ 1,246,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 850,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,616,000 TOTAL $ 1,655,000 $ 1,246,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 920,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 5,686,000 Project Description: The cities of Eugene and Springfield are currently cooperating in a Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) dealing with excess infiltration and inflow of rain and ground water into the sanitary sewer system. Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities in the most cost-effective manner identified by the plan. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Relation to Plans: The WWFMP plan will guide the use of these funds. Maintenance Impacts: The amount of funding available for repair and replacement of sanitary sewers in this program and within the Sanitary Sewer Repair program will keep the system in a steady state of repair. However, we have an aging sewer system infrastructure and the overall condition of the system is not expected to improve significantly with this level of funding. Therefore, these programs help keep maintenance needs for the existing system static, while expansion of the system causes an added maintenance impact. Page IV - 2 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Environmental Services Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category Metro Waterways Study Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $400,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram P50388 Project Number "U}> III ...... (0...... CD ~ (.0.)':3" (.0.)3 OCD -;a ~}> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Storm $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Project Description: Springfield is participating along with Eugene and Lane County inan Army Corps of Engineers General Investigation Study authorized under the Water Resources Development Act. Springfield's share (25%) of this approximately $3,500,000 project is $875,000. The current project is a feasibility study necessary to identify future water quality projects within the Eugene/Springfield metropolitan watershed. The Cedar Creek Drainage Basin has been identified as Springfield's highest priority study area. Other CIP projects, such as Channel Improvements, Floodplain Mapping and McKenzie Oxbow will qualify as in-kind match and satisfy the balance of the local obligation. The McKenzie River Floodplain mapping is currently underway as part of this project. Justification: This planning study will assist the City in future years to gain access to federal funding (similar to the Mill Race funding) for capital improvement projects that address drainage capacity, water quality, and flood control. Relation to Plans: This project relates to many plans affecting land use and public facilities throughout the Metro Area. Examples in Springfield include the Stormwater Management Plan, under development to meet Clean Water Act requirements, and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This is a planning project and has no direct maintenance impact until projects are selected. Page /V - 3 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Drainage Repair Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $1,270,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0):- Dl :::: 10 Dl m 0 (..)~ -1'0-3 Om ....::J ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIA liONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 20,000 $ 15,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 95,000 Construction $ 300,000 $ 135,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 855,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 320,000 $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 950,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 270,000 $ 150,000 $ 140,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 740,000 SDC Storm $ 50,000 $ - $ 60,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 210,000 TOTAL $ 320,000 $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 950,000 Project Description: This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace older pipe in the system and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe. Projects include: Repair West B St. storm outfall to WillameUe River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St., Channel 6th, 72nd St and 48th St. canals; Repair damagedguUer bars causing localized flooding at 2138 9th St., 1105 S St., 34522nd St., 15008 St and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations; Replace catch basin at 717 71 st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St. intersection, A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin from intersection of 17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Pipe the backyard drainage ditc~ between 46th - 47th St. and Bluebell- Aster St; Drainage repairs on Quarry Street and Park Street. Justification: The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenance and operating costs of the drainage system. Relation to Plans: Facilitates goals of the Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This is a minimal program for system repair and replacement and, while sufficient at this time it does not represent an amount of repair and replacement which will provide sustainable replacement of an aging system. Page IV - 4 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Channel Improvement Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $420,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram NIA Project Number ""0> III ::I: <0 III CD 0 w::T 013 OCD -h-~ g;)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 24,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 60,000 Construction $ 96,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 240,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ , 60,000 $ 300,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 120,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 $ - TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 300,000 Project Description: This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality and fish habitat functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and channel restoration. Justification: This project addresses the "Take Guidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in their issuance of the Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook Salmon. This project also enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality through channel restoration improvements. Relation to Plans: This project helps implement and is associated with the federally-funded Mill Race Restoration project, the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the DEQ Stormwater discharge permit, and the Metro Waterways project. Maintenance Impacts: While this is a maintenance-type project, some of the drainage way improvements will likely increase maintenance responsibility as the drainage ways take on more of a function for stormwater quality management, not just stormwater conveyance. Page IV - 5 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Environmental Services Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category Implement MS4 Permit Requirements Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $175,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U)> III ::l: to III CD 0 (.o)::T 0)3 OCD .....~ g:)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 Project Description: Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements. Justification: In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which will authorize the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The permit requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health and aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007 the City received the permit and this will become an ongoing program to maintain the permit. Relation to Plans: This project will assist with federal and state regulatory compliance as demonstrated through implementation of the City's Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, and facilitates City growth and development consistent with the Municipal and Development Codes. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance impacts will be considered and identified as projects are selected. Page /V - 6 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Envir. Services Mgr/City Engineer Project Manager Riparian Land Management/Acquisitions Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Preservation Project Category $350,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0)> Q) - cc- <1l Q) o (..)~ .......3 0<1l _:J g:; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total on-going program Land and Right-of-Way $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 50,000, $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Funding Source(s} SDC Storm $ 74,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 185,000 Drainage Capital $ 26,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 65,000 $ - TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Project Description: This project provides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them, and for purchase of riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. Justification: This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Code requirements and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, Springfield waterways routinely do not meet federal and state water quality safety standards for human and aquatic life. In addition to Federal Clean Water Act requirements to improve stormwater quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for at least 75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve this objective and some riparian protection has been established in the Development Code. In cases where riparian area protection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners, this funding will enable the City to identify priority areas for protection and to compensate property owners. Relation to Plans: This project supports implementation of the City Development Code, the Stormwater Management Plan, the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, along with compliance with the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act. Maintenance Impacts: Any City stormwater management facilities located within the acquired riparian areas will require increased maintenance. Anyon-going land management responsibilities will also require increased maintenance. Projects have not yet been selected. Cooperation with Willamalane and with environmental organizations, such as is being planned on the Ox~ow property, may mitigate City responsibilities and costs. Page IV - 7 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Page IV - 8 Maintenance Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Mill Race Water Control Structure Project Title $6,421,494 Total Cost Surface Drainage Maintenance Budget Subprogram P10667 Project Number \J)> III ~ (Q III (I) 0 (.U:::T CXl3 0(1) -~ ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way(Vinyard) $ 633,700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 340,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 5,397,794 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 6,371,494 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Funding Source(s) Federal Grant $ 4,080,270 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Capital Bond $ 526,724 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDC Storm $ 680,500 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Drainage Capital $ 350,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Existing City Assets $ 733,700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 6,371,494 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Project Description: Design and construct a new inlet from the Middle Fork of the Willamette to the Mill Race and modify hydraulic characteristics of the Mill Race and Mill Pond in order to improve water quality and stabilize year round flows. Obtain federal and state agency's approval as required. Justification: Restoration of the aquatic ecosystem of the Springfield Mill Race from Clearwater Park to 7th Street (the Booth- Kelly crane shed) bridge is the primary objective of this project. Additional project benefits include maintaining the groundwater level in the Springfield Utility Board's S. 28th Street well field; prevention of flooding along the Mill Race; and maintenance of adequate water supply for use by Springfield Forest Products. Due to potential adverse impact on anadromous fish, federal and state regulatory agencies have limited our use of equipment in the river to maintain Mill Race flows; these agencies are requiring construction of permanent flow management facilities. The estimated value of the existing City property and in-kind services form a portion of City match for this project. Relation to Plans: Addresses a Council top priority target of Mill Race development, inlet to outlet. Maintenance Impacts: Maintenance costs are expected to increase by about $28,000 per year after the construction of the new facility. That cost increase is mostly related to maintaining the additional planted area, public walkways, and other amenities which will be provided with the project. There have been discussions with Willamalane which will continue, regarding their interest in taking on some of these obligations after project completion. .o"" .----~:,:::;--~\ Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Traffic Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Street Light In-fill & Pole Replace Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $285,000 Total Cost Transportation Power and Light Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U)> III ..... (0..... CD ~ w::r t03 OCD ....::J ..... g:)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 17,500 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 35,000 Construction $ 107,500 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 35,000 $ 30,000 $ 125,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 125,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 160,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans. Reimburs $ - $ - Street Capital $ 125,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 160,000 TOTAL $ 125,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 40,000 $ 160,000 Project Description: Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by the public through the CIP process and throughout the year. Replace low pressure sodium (LPS) lights in concentrated areas. Test light poles at 7-10 year intervals and replace rotting poles and broken conduits of City- owned street light system. Justification: Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. Pole testing reveals condition of all City owned poles. The proposed project replaces poles identified as at the end of useful life. Relation to Plans: Lighting will be installed consistent with Street Lighting Program approved by the City Council in April 2004. Furthers the Council goal of continuing to make Springfield a safe and attractive community. Maintenance Impacts: Historically, the new street lighting program has added 5-10 new street lights per year. Estimated maintenance and operation cost for each LPS light added is $75 per year, and about $70 per year for HPS, and $71 per year for MH, so each year of the program would add $350 to $700 in annual O&M cost. Replacing LPS lights will reduce O&M in the long term. Page IV - 9 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM City Engineer Preservation Street Seal/Overlay Capi~1 Project Manager Project Category Project Title Improvement Projects $1,811,400 Street Capital Projects N/A Sheet Total Cost Budget Subprogram Project Number ""0)> III ::; co III CD 0 .j>..::r 03 Q~ .-+ ~)> ~ Project Description: A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement slurry seal and/or overlay performed by contract. Following is a partial list with of the highest priority Overlays: Gateway St. (6,820 ft., $1,193,500), Harlow Rd. (3,934 ft., $688,500), Laura St. (2,625 ft., $285,000), W. "0" St. (925 ft., $162,000), "0" St. (1,790 ft., $313,500), W. "0" St. (4,508 ft., $790,000), W. Fairview Dr. (3,700 ft., $647,500), 19th St. (531 ft., $93,000), 18th St. (2,069 ft., $363,000), 28th St. (5.087 ft., $891,000), 36th St. (2,452 ft., $429,100), 42nd St. (2,889 ft., $506,000), Commercial Ave. (496 ft., $87,000). PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year T Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 30,000 $ 41 ,000 $ - $ 19,000 $ 15,000 $ 26,000 $ 101,000 Construction $ 761,400 $ 372,000 $ - $ 176,000 $ 137,000 $ 234,000 $ 919,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 791,400 $ 413,000 $ - $ 195,000 $ 152,000 $ 260,000 $ 1,020,000 Funding Source(s) SOC Trans. Reimburs $ 185,400 $ 288,000 $ - $ 90,000 $ 97,000 $ 100,000 $ 575,000 Street Capital $ 606,000 $ 125,000 $ - $ 105,000 $ 55,000 $ 160,000 $ 445,000 TOTAL $. 791,400 $ 413,000 $ - $ 195,000 $ 152,000 $ 260,000 $ 1,020,000 Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs is a relatively low-cost method of prolonging the street life. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. Relation to Plans: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Maintenance Impacts: Public Works has estimated that an annual budget of $1 ,000,000 per year for street capital maintenance is necessary to adequately keep the existing street system in its present condition. Therefore the present funding available is insufficient and will, in the long run, result in a deterioration of the streets and greater future maintenance cost. Page IV - 10 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category Woodstave Removal 1 Oth to 14th Capital Project Title Improvement Projects P50174 Sheet Project Number $300,000 Total Cost Drainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram "'U)> III ::; to III CD 0 .j:>.:::r ......3 OCD _:J g;}: , PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 Design and Engineering $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) Drainage Capital $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Project Description: Project to take the last active portion of the wood stave storm line out of service. Portions of this line lie under buildings and across properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposal requirements. Justification: This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problems and costs. Relation to Plans: This project will conform to recommendations of the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This section of line is a significant pending maintenance concern. Because of the line coating, any maintenance on the line must be done with special procedures and precautions. Removal and replacement of the line will avoid larger future maintenance costs. """'~--- , ""';':','.:'" ~) lA-IlLL POND '-- .~ ------.-.;---.-,.... r.........,-._ Page IV - 11 ' Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Building Official Project Manager Preservation Project Category Booth-Kelly Building Removal Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $100,000 Total Cost Booth-Kelly Capital Projects Budget SubprQgram N/A Project Number "'U)> Il>::; lC Il> CD 0 ....:::T "'3 OCD -;:!. ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Funding Source(s) Booth Kelly Reserve. $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Project Description: Removal of building, wood pilings and Millrace bank restoration. Justification: In conjunction with the Army Corp of Engineers Mill Race project, the City is responsible for the removal of the building constructed over the Mill Race west of the spillway dam. If the Mill Race project is delayed, the removal of the building and all ancillary work will not occur. Relation to Plan: This project supports Booth-Kelly development consistent with the Booth-Kelly Development Plan. Maintenance Impacts: Removes maintenance demands of the existing building. Page IV - 12 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Page IV - 13 Building Maintenance Supervisor Project Manager Preservation Project Category Building Maintenance Projects Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $2,100,000 Total Cost Building Maintenance Budget Subprogram NIA Project Number "U)> Il) ~ lOll) CD 0 -l>o.:::T "'3 OCD ....::J ~; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 160,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 2,100,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 160,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 2,100,000 Funding Source(s) SDC (old) $ 160,000 $ - $ - unknown $ - $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 160,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,900 $ 2,100,000 Project Description: Perform various planned preservation maintenance and repair projects on City-owned buildings, including painting, roof replacement, HVAC maintenance and replacement, lighting and alarm system replacement and upgrade, elevator repairs, etc. Justification: These projects are necessary to maintain and preserve City-owned buildings. Project needs, costing and prioritization are identified in the comprehensive DLR Building Condition Report. Nearly $600K in deferred maintenance (backlog) and $1.5M in 5-yr CIP is identified. Extending beyond the 5-yr CIP, the funding need will increase to a $1,000,000 per year after 2013. Relation to Plans: Carries out Council Priority - Building Preservation Maintenance Impacts: Project management and support will require 1.0 FTE per year. Funding for an additional position will be requested through the budget process, Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:26 AM "U}> III ::l: to III III 0 ~::::J" ~3 o III _::J - ~}> City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category 21 st Street Reconstruction D Street to Main Street Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $370,000 Total Cost N/A Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ 80,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 270,000 $ - $ 270,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 370,000 Funding Source(s) Street Capital $ - $ , - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 SDC Trans, Improvement $ - $ - $ 270,000 $ - $ 270,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 270,000 $ - $ 370,000 Project Description: Major rehabilitation/reconstruction of 21st Street from D Street to Main Street. The project will include new sidewalks, bike lanes and pavement. The total project cost is estimated to be $900,000. Justification: During the summer 2006 the J Street to D Street section of 21 st Street was reconstructed. In 2005, Olympic Street to Centennial Boulevard was overlayed. The D Street to Main Street section represents the final segment of 21 st Street to be repaired. This section is serious structural decline and current maintenance levels cannot keep up with the current rate of decline. The intersection at Main Street will also be addressed with this project. Relation to Plans: Adopted in the Central Lane TMA Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan. Maintenance Impacts: Due to the street's current condition, this project will reduce the on-going maintenance effort and cost. Page IV - 14 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Page IV - 15 Maintenance Manager Project Manager Preservation Project Category Mill Race Interim Pump Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $ 220,000 Total Cost Surface Drainage Maintenance Budget Subprogram Project Number PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 Construction $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220 000 Funding Source(s) Federal Grant Capital Bond SDC Storm Drainage Capital $ 220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 220,000 TOTAL $ - $ 220 000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 220 000 "'0)> l\) ::+ lO l\) CD " -"':::T 013 OeD ...,:J g:; Project Description: Install a electric water pump at Clearwater Park to provide flow in the Mill Race when flows in the Willamette River are not sufficient to sustain adequate water needs in the Mill Race to meet municipal and industrial supplies. Install 300 feet of 10 inch pipe across the parking lot. Contact Springfield Utility Board to supply electric service to pump. Programmed funds are for design and construction of the new pump and pipe system Justification: The PW-Maintenance Division is responsible for maintaining flows in the Mill Race. Flows in the Willamette River are frequently insufficient to meet municipal and industrial water resource needs. Consequently, the PW Maintenance Division regularly pumps water into the Mill Race from the Willamette River at the Mill Race inlet. Due to shifting river bed loads, river flows will not gravity feed into the Mill Race during low water situations, Although pumping is tolerated by regulating agencies it will not be acceptable the coming year 2008. A new pumping alternative that is acceptable to the Federal and State agencies is to install a pump at Clearwater Park near the proposed new Mill Race inlet. This alternative makes use of the future Mill Race course. It is anticipated that this pump will be remain at the new inlet when constructed to support continued Mill Race flows during low river flow events. Relation to Plans: This pump configuration will utilize the planned Mill Race course. Maintenance Impacts: Currently the Division rents a diesel pump to maintain flow the Mill Race. Pump rental, fuel and labor amount to approximately $40,000 per year. Installation of an electric pump will alleviate fuel and the labor to fuel the pump, in favor of lower electric costs. Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:26 AM City Engineer Project Manager Preservation Project Category "A" Street and 4th Street Overlay Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $520,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number ~']> 10:::: (1) (') -",,::T 0)3 O~ -.... 01']> CXl PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 Construction $ - $ 450,000 $ 450,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 70,000 $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 520,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 70,000 $ 155,000 $ 225,000 SDC Trans, Improvement $ - Street Capital $ - $ 295,000 $ 295,000 Urban Renewal Funds $ - $ - $ - $ - redevelopment and reQional traffic. $ - $ 70,000 $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 520,000 Project Description: Overlay "A" Street from 5th Street to Mill Street, and 4th Street from Main Street to "C" Street. Some locations may require more extensive base repair due to the dilapidated condition. Justification: To make way for the construction of the Justice Center, L TD Bus traffic was put onto "A" Street. "A" Street is due for an overlay which will also bolster the structure . to withstand the additional stress of the added bus traffic. Along with "A" Street, 4th Street will also be overlayed between Main Street and "C" Street. This project will be scheduled once all major construction components are completed on the jail and all in street utility work is done. Relation to Plans: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Maintenance Impacts: This project is seen as a priority to keep the status of the City's collector and arterial roadways in a manageable state and is identified under the Street Seal/Overlay Category. By overlaying this portion of "A" Street, we can lengthen the life of the street and avoid a costly reconstruction project. Page IV - 16 Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Page IV - 17 Assistant City Manager Project Manager . Preservation Projects Project Category Springfield Depot Repairs Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $40,000 Total Cost N/A Budget Subprogram P11001 Project Number ~)> lO~ CD 0 .J>.:::T ......3 O~ -- 0'1)> <Xl PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - "- TOTAL $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 Funding Source(s) $ - 208-62271-611008 $ - $ - Unknown $ 40,000 $ 40,000 " $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 Project Description: In the event the City takes ownership of the Springfield Depot facility, the funds in 2007-2008 are for initial repairs, including HVAC and railing repairs, The 2008-2009 portion is for an A & E to evaluate the depot for required, necessary or suggested improvement and to design those improvements as necessary. Justification: In the event the City takes ownership the initial improvements will be necessary to make the building a safe comfortable place for tenants. The second phase will allow the City of determine improvements that will add life to the building and improve it to attract new and hire paying tenants. Relation to Plans: Maintenance Impacts: This will be a new facility to be maintained by Public Works. Capital projects will be designed to reduce the amount of maintenance needed by upgrading the facility. Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Building Official Project Manager Preservation Project Category Booth-Kelly Internal Structural Improvements Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $200,000 Total Cost Booth-Kelly Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U}> Q) ::t 1C Q) lD 0 .J>.:::r 003 OlD ....::J g;; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 90,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Funding Source(s) Booth Kelly Reserve $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Project Description: Structural repair/improvements to the Booth-Kelly Center. Justification: This project will complete the internal structural rehabilitation of certain areas of the facility that were considered non-essential when the initial repairs were completed in the early 1990's. Certain structural and/or lease space modifications are also anticipated due to tenant vacancies. This project also includes new roof covering for the southeast portion of the facility and waterline replacement in the east-west alleyway. Relation to Plans: This Project supports Booth-Kelly development consistent with the Booth-Kelly Devlopment Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This project completes some of the needed maintenance for the Booth-KellyK facility. Page IV- 18 Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:26 AM Page IV - 19 Community Services Manager Project Manager Booth-Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Preservation Project Category $300,000 Total Cost Booth-Kelly - Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "'0)> Il) ~ co Il) CD 0 .j>..:::T co3 OCD ....::J g:; PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Funding Source(s) Booth-Kelly Reserve $ 300,000 $ 300,000 618 92300-93033 $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Project Description: Complete roof replacement or epoxy overcoating of the existing metal roof decking of the "saw-tooth" building, commonly referred to as Building G at the Booth-Kelly Center. Justification: The existing roof material of the "saw-tooth" building ;s over 50 years old and no longer provides adequate weather protection for the building users or interior equipment. Relation to Plans: This project supports the preservat tion of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth-Kelly Development Plan Maintenance Impacts: The replacement or overcoating of the roof decking will significantly reduceleliminate the ongoing maintenance demands of the roof for a period of approximately 20 years. Last Updated 3/4/2008 9:26 AM ~~ TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT cofii (l) () ~ ~ IMPROVEMENTS _::J (11...... (X))> Traffic Engineer Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Traffic Control Projects Project Title $600,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Project Number "U}> III ::t lC III lD 0 01::T ......3 OlD -a ~}> Project Description: This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of roundabouts at various intersections in town. Potential candidate intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th S1., 42nd & Marcola Road, 28th & Main, 21st & Main, 40th & Daisy S1. and 28th & Centennial. The modification of signals may include change to permissive left turn at some existing signalized intersections. School speed zones beacons and miscellaneous striping and signing improvements may also be implemented under the Traffic Control Projects. PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Ongoing Program Land and Right-of-Way $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Design and Engineering $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 38,000 Construction $ 160,000 $ 80,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ 312,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 400,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 400,000 TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 400,000 Justification: As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop sign control. The intersections will meet roundabout or signal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed. The modification of existing signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and to enhance traffic flow. Relation to Plans: This project is consistent with the Metro Area Transportation Plan for improving traffic flow, traffic safety, and reducing vehicular accidents. . Maintenance Impacts: Traffic signals will increase costs for power, lamp replacement, and timing modifications. Roundabouts will increase costs for irrigation and landscape maintenance. Annual cost for roundabouts is about half the cost of traffic signals, with annual per signal cost being about $6,500 and annual roundabout maintenance cost being about $3,300. Page V - 1 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:27 AM "U}> III ::+ (C III CD 0 O1:T N3 OCD ....:J - ~}> Transportation Manager Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category $1,657,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram Project Description: Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity and relieve congestion. Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and reduce fuel use and to allow for continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years ago resulted in a list of priority projects. Relation to Plans: Furthers Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the top priority target of Gateway Development. Conforms to Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis recommendations. Maintenance Impacts: Any improvements which expand the infrastructure in the area will result in added maintenance costs. Page V - 2 Gateway Area Traffic Improvements Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet N/A Project Number Last Update 3/4/2008 9:27 AM Transportation Manager Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Intelligent Transport Systems Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $350,000 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U)> III .... 10.... m ~ 01:::r (.)3 Om -;a. g:)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way Ongoing Program $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 25,000 Construction $ 90,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 225,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Improvement $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Project Description: Installation of various traffic control, information and data collection systems such as signal interconnect equipment, detection and count loops, incident management and traffic conditions signing, traffic responsive signal systems and software, and traveler information systems. Justification: To provide centralized data collection, control of traffic signals and signs in outlaying areas which enhance the ability to communicate driver information, control traffic flow, and coordinate signals with each other. Relation to Plans: Oregon Department of Transportation Eugene-Springfield ITS Plan. Maintenance Impacts: Dependent on the type of systems installed. Page V - 3 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:27 AM Transportation Manager Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Beltline/Gateway Intersection Project Title $7,845,505 Total Cost Transportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number ""0)> OJ ::+ 10 OJ CD 0 01:::r -l>-3 OCD -~ ~)> PRIOR Costs APPROPRIA liONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ 3,245,505 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 4,200,000 $ 200,000 ' $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 7,445,505 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 Funding Source(s) Developer $ 6,797,195 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 STP ODOT -STP $ 573,160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - LTD $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ODOT ROW $ 50,150 TOTAL $ 7,445,505 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 Project Description: Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, including construction of a couplet and purchase of right-of-way. Justification: Needed for improving level of service at the intersection and maintaining proper function of the intersection in relationship to the 1-5/Beltline Interchange. Relation to Plans: This improvement is required as part of the 1-5/Beltline Interchange improvements as described in the Environmental Assessment ofthe 1-5/Beltline project Maintenance Impacts: There will be additional lanes, landscaping and intersections to maintain. Page V - 4 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:27 AM City Engineer Project Manager South 48th Street Connection Main Street to Daisy Street Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category $710,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram N/A Project Number "U~ III ::; lC III CD (') 01:::T 013 0(1) -~ ~~ PRIOR Costs APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other $ - $ - $ 535,000 $ - $ - $ 535,000 TOTAL $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ 535,000 $ - $ - $ 535,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - SDC Trans, Improvements $ - $ - $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 360,000 Developer $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ 175,000 TOTAL $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ 535,000 $ - $ - $ 535,000 Project Description: Construct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South 48th Street Intersection. Justification: Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street to support planned land development Project #901 IN RTP and TransPlan. Relation to Plans: The project is listed in the Systems Development charge projects and is adopted in the Central Lane TMA Regional Transportation Plan. Maintenance Impacts: This project will add roadway, sidewalks and facilities to maintenance effort. Page V - 5 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:27 AM Traffic Engineer Project Manager Transportation Safety & Enhancmt Project Category Pioneer Parkway Lighting "Q" Street to Hayden Bridge Way Project Title Capital Improvement Projects Sheet $250,000 Total Cost Street Capital Projects Budget Subprogram Project Number ~'J> 10::1: III 0 01'::J 013 o~ ..... ..... ~'J> Ibsts PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 5 Year Total Land and Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Design and Engineering $ - Construction $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 Other $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Funding Source(s) SDC Trans, Reimbursement $ 81 ,000 $ 81,000 SDC Trans, Improvement $ 25,000 $ 69,000 $ - $ - $ 69,000 Street Capital $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 50,000 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Project Description: Install new street illumination poles, fixtures, services, and raceways to illuminate Pioneer Parkway East and Pioneer Parkway West to current standards. Illumination of Pioneer Path is not included in the scope of this project and is expected to be completed by L TO's EmX project due to the proximity of the path to the transit ways. Justification: Traffic volumes and truck usage of Pioneer Parkway is increasing with the opening of Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkway. The road will continue to experience increases in use as the RiverBend area develops. Street illumination improves traffic safety and user comfort by increasing driver perception of the road users and environment around them. Relation to Plans: No street lighting planning document exists. Projects are identified by staff and citizens as needs arise. Maintenance Impacts: Increases in payments made to Springfield Utility Board for energy, operations and maintenance are expected to amount to approximately $4,600 per year. Page V - 6 Last Update 3/4/2008 9:27 AM INDEX Attachment A Page 57 of 58 INDEX Street/Traffic Signal Projects "A" Street and 4th Street Overlay....... ........ ........ .....IV-17 21st Street Reconstruction 0 to Main Street..... ....... ..... .IV-15 Beltline/Gateway Intersection........................ ......... .V-4 Bob Straub IGA With Lane County.. ................... .......... .1-8 Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure.. ................ ......... ...1-1 Franklin Boulevard Planning....... .................. ...........1-4 Gateway Area Traffic Improvements.. ................ ......... ...V-2 Intelligent Transport Systems........ ............ ............ ..V-3 Pioneer Parkway Lighting "Q" Street to Hayden Bridge Way...... .V-6 S. 48th Street Connection Main to Daisy....... ........ ........ .V-5 Street Light In-fill and Pole Replacement... ......... ........IV-10 Street Seal/Overlay.......................................... IV-ll Traffic Control Projects...................................... .V-1 Transportation Demand Project.............. ......... .........111-1 Sanitary Sewer Project Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor. .................. ......... ...1-2 Jasper Road Sewer Extension........ .............. ........... ...1-7 Sani tary Sewer Repair......................................... IV~ 1 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement........... ............ ..IV-2 Storm Sewer Projects 68th & "0" Street Drainage...................................III-3 Channel Improvement........................................... IV-5 Drainage Repair............................................... IV-4 Implement MS4 Permit Requirements............. ....... .........IV-6 Metro Waterways Study....... '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IV-3 Mill Race Interim Pump....................................... IV-16 Mill Race Water Control Structure........... ....:.... ....... ..IV-8 Riparian Land Management Acquisitions...... .......... ........ .IV-7 S & T Street Drainage between 10th & Debra.......... .........111-2 South 59th and Aster Drainage............... ......... ........111-4 South 67th and Ivy Drainage............... ........... ........111-5 Woodstave Removal 10th to 14th ............ .......... ........IV-12 Miscellaneous Projects Booth-Kelly Building Removal............... ........... .......IV-13 Booth-Kelly Internal Structural Improvements.......... .......IV-19 Building Maintenance Projects........................ ...... ..IV-14 City Building Maintenance........................... ......... .IV-9 City Participation, Private Projects............... ........... .1-3 Future Growth Projects........................................ .1-5 Gray-Jaqua Agreement............................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-6 Justice Center Facility........................... ........... .11-1 Springfield Depot Repair........................... ........ ..IV-18 Attachment A Page 58 of 58