HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 08 Rainbow Water District Withdrawal EC SP 08-15, Journal Number LRP2006-00030 (International Church of the Foursquare Gospel)
I
~. ,\
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
March 17,2008
Regular Meeting
Development ~
Jim Donovan~ .
726-3660 .
Consent CaJ ar ~
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 08-14, JOURNAL
NUMBER LRP2006-00030 (INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE
FOURSQUARE GOSPEL)
ACTION
REQUESTED:
The City Council is requested to conduct a second reading and adopt/not adopt the
attached ordinance: AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN
NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET,
WEST OF 7th STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMA TEL Y 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED
AS TAX LOTS 12600 AND 12700, Tl7S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN
AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT.
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222.520) require that territory located in the
Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdrawn
from that district to prevent double taxation. ORS requires withdrawal prior to
March 31 st of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation in order to
develop the property for urban use. The subject property was annexed to the City of
Springfield effective on February 7, 2008.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Ordinance with Legal Description and Maps, Boundary Commission
Staff Report, City Council Resolution and Notices of Annexation Adoption
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
Legal notice was published in the Springfield News as required by ORS 222.520
and notices were posted in four public places. City Council conducted a public
hearing and first reading of the ordinance on March 10,2008.
ORDINANCE NO.
(Special)
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF
HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET, WEST OF 7th STREET AND INVOLVING
APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS LOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W
S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD;
HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER
DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield
by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
Number File EC SP 08-14, effective 2f7108, as recommended in City Planning File No. LRP2006-
00030 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07-59 (and further described in Exhibit A &
B), and
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow
Water District, and
WHEREAS, the City cif Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption
on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no
objections raised.
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein.
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Orego~, said property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600,
and 12700, and commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Road in Springfield; as more particularly
described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 08-14.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008,
by a vote of _ for and against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 17th day of March 2008.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Recorder
" i';'
~~~~_.~..,..h~_~'::\."",..,
?-:,.l:z. $, J c:> rs:-_........
__' :-.~ :_'~ 1 '.>.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
EXHIBIT A
--..
.....
Blackstone St.
..--
-
CD
~
en
:;
CD
3!n
~e
!:II:::!
-e~
~t.l
~
1\
j
-
CD
CD
L..
-
en
:;
/,l)
~ BlacJ<slo~e Sl
.~~~l_'~~
~~~~~~~~'1-: :'.
...--~. .. \
_._ . CD
,~~ ~
.~'- ]
"i.!
.'--0
Royal
Delle
~arlc
Cambridge SlJJ;-
T 1 /
I
Hayden Bridge Way
-
CD
!
en
-fa
-
,
..
~ ,
- ~.
CD
~ !!
- .!
en !:II
-5 i
r--.
II) ,
----J
. Not to ,fco/e
Legal Description
EXHIBIT A:- P1
Royaldel Lane '.;,.
: ". c
,
..
".0; : :;,.'
River Knoll Way ..;~:..
::":.::i.
.,;. "
.'V~
..
,
" .: '. . .::i~X~::'
. ',. :.:;....,:..
. -. -.-
" .:. -' . :: _.':~. ....:
: . . :"::3[;::
: ".:. ,'.;';::
. .' :':.~ ~:: ! :;>.:t/;:/
'. "
..
<
~.::.;.
: ',:iFg.
t..,.
.N..........,...:..:....
:~., ~ ';' ..~':~;~
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, NotificatIon No. 3810, in Section 23,
. Township 17 South,' Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; thence South 010 01' 15"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 890 53 ' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 000 01' IS" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89053' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron'pipe; thence South 00013' 30" West 319.50
feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of
Hayden Bridge Way, North 890 53' We~ 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; .
thence North 000 01 'IS" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron
pipe; and thence South 890 53"East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
less.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 2
EXHIBIT B - P1
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
(541) 682-4425
FAX (541) 682-2635
February 13,2008
Ms. Amy Sowa, Recorder
City of Springfield
225 5th Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
Dear Ms. Sowa:
The enclosed final order has been enacted by the Lane County Local Government Boundary
Commission and is forwarded in conformance with ORS 199.505.
Final Order 1332 (C SP 08 - 14) annexing territory to the City of Springfield
(International Church of Foursquare Gospel)
Please acknowledge receipt of this final order.
Sincerely,
VaJo,t3{. j~
Paula L. Taylor
Executive Officer
Enclosures
cc: lI,lternational Church of Foutsquare Gospel
Rainbow Water and Fire District
Willamalane Park and Recreation District
LCBC:LCOG: L'\BC\FOL\PH\2008\CSPOB14 FOLDOC
Last Saved: February J J. 2008
ATTACHMENT 1 - 3
.'
EXHIBIT B - P2
LANECOUNTYLOCALGOVERNMENTBOUNDARYCOMM~SION
FINAL ORDER 1332
Approved: February 7, 2008
Effective: February 7, 2008
( File C SP 08 - 14
( In the Matter of Annexing Territory
( To the City of Springfield
- Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A -
WHEREAS, Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield was filed on December 31,
2oo7-in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A)-for annexation of territory to the City of
Springfield, described in i:lttached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B; and,
WHEREAS, the commission duly published notice of the public hearing in accordance'
with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the rules of the commission and ORS 199.452(1),
conducted a public hearing on February 7, 2008; and,
WHEREAS, on the basis of the study of the proposal, which considered economic,
demographic, and sociological trends and physical development of the land including the
applicable comprehensive plan, and of the public hearing, the commission approved the proposal
and made the findings and reasons attached as Exhibit C.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: That the area described be a part of the City of
Springfield.
ORDERED BY THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY
COMMISSION THIS 7th DA Y OF FEBRUARY 2008.
~
'2-10110//
Date
NOTE: The subject territory is within the Rainbow Water and Frre District and will remain in the
district until withdrawn through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS
222.
In accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c), the territory is hereby a part of the Lane County Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District and Willamalane Park and Recreation District.
pt: LCBC: L:\BC\FOL\PH\2~CSP08U FO.DOC
Last Savt!d: Ft!bruary 7, 2008
ATTACHMENT 1 - 4
EXHIBIT B - P3
EXHffiIT A
Beg at an iron pipe set 90.00 ft W and 600.00 ft N of a pt 2,823.48 ft (42.78 ch) S of the NE cor
of the Jacob Halstead DLC No. 47, Notification No. 3810, S23 T17S R03W WM, Lane County,
Oregon;
th SOooO l' 15"E 90.00 ft to an iron pipe;
th N89053'W 31.50 ft to an iron pipe;
th SoooO l' 15"E 150.50 ft to an iron pipe;
th S89053'E 127.59 ft to a pt on the W Ii of the William Spencer DLC No. 50 that is marked by
an Iron pIpe;
th Sooo13'30''W 319.50 ft alg sd W Ii to a pt on the N mar of Hayden Bridge Way, sd mar is
, offset 40.00 ft Nly by perpendicular measurement fr the clli of sd rd; .
th alg sd N mar N89053''W 369.77 ft mil to the SE cor Lot 2~ Block 6 of Royal Delle, as platted
and recorded in Bk 29 Pg 21 LCOPR, Lane County, Oregon;
th NOOoO l' 15"W alg the E Ii of sd Block 6 and its Nly extension 560.00 ft to an iron pipe;
th S89053'E 275.00 ft to the POB, all in Lane County, Oregon.
LCBC:LCOG: L-\BC\LEGAL\2008\CSP0814 LGLDOC
Last Saved: February n, 2008
. .
Pinal order 1332
C SP 08 - 14
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 1 - 5
EXHIBIT B
P4
EXHIBIT B
TTTl
, ANNEXATION AREA
i Includes TI...s 12600,12700,17-03-23-34
--l Owned by the International CllUrch
of Foursquare Gospel
BC File C SP08-14
-
CD
l!!
-
C/J
=
(0
J
-
CD
!
-
en
=
.Il)
. Royal
DeHe
Parle
--"
'1
!
rl
.'5-.1
Final Order 1332
C SP 08 - 14
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 1 6
EXHIBIT B - P5
EXHIBIT C
Findings:
1. This proposal was initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield
after receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance
with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to be a valid filing under .OAR
191-006.
2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (TI7S R03W S23 Map 34
tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the
International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a
church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield.
3. The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan).
4. The annexation area was zoned LDRlUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe,
in Lane County. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR
consistent with the land use designation.
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
5. The bo.undary commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the
public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties
were given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
6. After annexation to Springfield, the annexation area would be withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water and Fire District. There would be some financial impact on the district
because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was
developed with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn from the district
through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On
behalf of the City of Springtield, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly
to the annexation area. :
7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District .in accordance with ORS
199.510(2)( c).
8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c).
9. This request was consistent with this standard.
Final Order 1332
C SP 08 - 14
Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 7
EXHIBIT B - P6
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as
the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within
Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary.
11. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services
to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule,
implementing policies (1), (2), (5), and (7).
12. The proposed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan
and the boundary commission administrative' rules for ultimately providing urban
facilities and services to this territory. Annexation of tax lotted property fulfilled the
Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
13. The proposed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary
commission law and the Metro Plan.
14. This request was consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard.
Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future 'growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially via1?'e. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d)
15. The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro
Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as
subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted property assisted in fulfilling the Metro
Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
"
16. Tl1e Metro Plan recognized annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority
for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas.
17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring
urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary.
18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy
#8, page ll-c-4 and defined on page V -3, were either available or can be provided in a
timely manner.
Final Order 1332
C SP 08 - 14
Page 2 of3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 8
EXHIBIT B - P7
19. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental
step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land
uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the
metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for
the area and fulfIlled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
21. This request was consistent with this standard.
Reasons:
1. The proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner.
2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDc acknowledged Metro Plan.
3. The services required in the Metro Plan were either available or could be provided in a
timely manner when needed.
4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary comnnSSIon actions supporting
annexation to the City of Springfield.
5. The proposal was consistent with boundary co~ssion administrative rule policies.
LCBC:LCOG: L'\BC\FOL\EXC\2008\CSP0814 EXC.DOC
Last Saved: FebTllary 11.2008
Fmal Order 1332
C SP 08 - 14
Page'3 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 9
EXHIBIT B - P8
STAFF NOTES
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
(99 East Broadway. Suite 400. Eugene. OR 9140]-3] 1 I)
Eugene City HaD Council Clamber
m Pearl Street. Eugene
February 1. 2008
7:00 p.m.
Annexation of Territory to the City of Springfield (International Church of Foursquare Gospel)
N.A. Be File C SP 08 -14
Initiated by Resolution 07-59. by the City of Springfield with consents from property
owners
Action under ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commission law
Received December 31. 2007
Action to be taken by March 30, 2008
Description
The annexation area includes two tax lots located in east Springfield. north of Hayden
Bridge Way, east of 5th Street, south of Blackstone Street, and west of Old
Orchard Lane
Property owner]: International Church of Foursquare Gospel (600 Hayden Bridge Way. Springfield)
Tax lots: 12600 and 12700, T17S R03W S23 Map 34
Acres: :!: 4. I 3
Estimate of existing population: 0
Existing land use: Church and related facilities, vacant
Existing zoning in Lane County: LDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe
overlay
Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
. (acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended)
Existing public services to the property: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County
Sheriff),' schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (Lane County, City of
Springfield), fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of
Springfield), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District)
Reason for Annexation
The property owner requested aimexation to prepare the site for additional church facility
development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan requires
properties to annex in order to receive urban services.
Notice
As required by ORS 199.463(1), notice of a .public hearing must be published in a
newspaper of general circulation not more than 25 days nor less than 15 days before the
I Property owner means the owner of the title of real property or the contract purchaser of real property as shown on
the last available complete assessment roll. ORS 199.415(13)
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 - ]4) - February 7, 2008
PageIV-A-I ATTACHMENT 1 - 10
EXHIBIT B - P9
hearing. In this ca~ notice of the public hearing was advertised in The Eugene
Register-Guard on 17, 2008. A second notice may be published in a newspaper of
general circulation or notice of the hearing may be mailed to each owner of land in the
affected territory,2 as described in the petition,3 not more than 15 days before the hearing.
In this ca~ notice of the hearing was sent to the affected property owner (Tim Baskin'
and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International Church of Foursquare Gospel, owner
of the property proposed for annexation) on January 25, 2008. The final notice required
by the boundary commission law is the posting of a notice of the public hearing in ,the
affected city, district, or territory at least 15 days before the hearing. In this case, notice
of the public hearing was posted in the area of the annexation, at the Springfield dty
hall, and at the LDne County courthouse on January 23, 2008.
In conformance with OAR 191-005-0065(3), these staff notes are incorporated as part of the
record of the boundary commission public hearing of February 7, 2008.
This annexation proposal was fIled with the boundary commission in accordance with ORS
199.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by Resolution No. 07-59 by the City of Springfield. Prior to initiating
the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consent from the property owner (Tim
Baskin and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International Church of Foursquare Gospel)
requesting annexation. At the time the annexation was initiated by the city, there were no
electors4 registered within the annexation area. The statutory provision to receive consents from
owners is met.
The proposal was filed with the boundary commission on December 31, 2007, and boundary
commission action must occur by March 24, 2008 (90-day statutory time frame). If the
annexation is approved by the boundary commission. on February 7, 2009, it will become
effective upon passage of the final order. .
The proposed annexation area includes two tax lots (refer to Maps No. IV-A-l and IV-A-2). The
annexation area is currently developed with one church on site. Annexation to Springfield will
allow additional church development to occur.
The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. It is adjacent
to other noncontiguous portions of the city. The urban growth boundary (UGB) is located
approximately, 600 feet north of the', annexation area. The annexation area is designated low-
density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and is
zoned LDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay. in Lane County. Upon
the effective date of the annexation, the UF overlay will automatically be removed and the
annexed properties will be zoned consistent with the plan designation.
2 Affected territory melmS the territory descn"bed in the petition. ORS 199.415(3)
3 Petition means the documents required to initiate a boundary change and includes, but is not limited to, an initiating
document, legal description, cadastral maps, and information fonn. ORS 199.415(14), ORS 199.490(4), and OAR
J 91-006-??oo(3)
.4 Elector means an individual registered to vote at an address within the affected territory. ORS J99.49O(1) and (5)
and ORS 199.505
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP08-14) - February 7,2008
Page IV -A-2
ATTACHMENT 1 -11
EXHIBIT B - P10
The annexation was initiated by the City of Springfield on December 3, 2007. An Annexation
Agreement outlining the agreements between the city and the owner for the provision of urban
services and financing responsibility has been fully executed for the annexation area.
BOUNDARY COMMISSION REFERRALS
Boundary commission referrals were sent to the Lane County Land Management Division, Lane
County Environmental Health Division, Lane County Board of Commissioners, and Rainbow
Water and Fire District.
No referral responses were received as of January 30, 200S.
BOUNDARY COMMISSION STANDARDS - STAFF ANALYSIS
In this section of the staff notes, each applicable boundary commission standard is addressed.
These standards are derived from ORS 199 and the boundary commission's policy administrative
rule (OAR 191, Division 30).
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
This annexation r~quest was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined
. to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary
commission filing requirements). The item was placed on the boundary commission's agenda
for February 7, 2ooS. Notice of the boundary commission's public hearing has been published in
accordance with Oregon law.. Any person may attend and will be given a reasonable opportunity
to be heard.
The proposed annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The fIre district
contracts with the City of Springfield for fIre services within itS boundaries. Upon the effective
date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically withdrawn from the fire district
in accordance with ORS 199.510(2)(a) and the city will provide fIre services directly to the
annexed property.
The Metro Plan identifies the city as the ultimate provider of urban services within the UGB.
Policy #18, page D-C-6, in the Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the city occur,
existing special service districts within the UGB will be dissolved. The continued annexation of
properties to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which likely will result in
the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area.
Upon' annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane County Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.5IO(2)(c)]. This special district was formed to provide
the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the
cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area.
LCLGBC Staff ~otes (C SP08- ]4) - February 7, 200S
Page N-A-3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 12
EXHIBIT B - P11
Upon annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the WilIamaIane Park and
Recreation District, which provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within
the City of Springfield.
This request is consistent with this standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
The area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan.
Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Springfield is the unit
of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to territory in this area. The
proposed annexation is not contiguous to the main body" of the City of Springfield.
Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro
Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous annexation (policy #12,
page II-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the following criteria:
a. The area to be annexed will be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired
immediately by the residents/property owners.
b. The area to be annexed can be serviced. (with a minimum level of services, as
directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and is a logical
extension of the city's service delivery system.
c. The annexation proposal is accompanied by support within the area proposed for
annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in the affected territory.
This annexation . is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing
policies (1), (2), (5), and (7) whic~ recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred
method of servicing urbanizable land~
(1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service
within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through annexation to a city in order to provide urban services to urbanizable
lands.
(5) This policy encourages tbeprovision of urban levels of service within 'urban
growth boundaries.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 - ]4) - February 7, 2008
Page N-A-4
ATTACHMENT 1 -13
EXHIBIT B - P12
(7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing
city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable
lands.
. Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing
out to an acknowledged urban growth boundary, short-term boundaries are created which are
logical within the context of the future service boundary. In the long term territory within this
geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. Annexation to the city fuIf.1.lls the policies
adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
. This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard~
Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and futur.e growth. For major boundary changes~
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d)
The proposal is within the Metro Plan urban growth boundary. The Metro Plan was
acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August 19~2
and has been subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest
priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas
(policies #8 and #10, page II-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the urban
growth boundary will be annexed to an existing city (poli~y #16. page ll-C-6).
The annexation area is currently designated low-density residential in the Metro Plan. H the
annexation is approved, the tax lotted properties will be rezoned to a !.DR, a city zoning district
consistent with the plan designation.
The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in
place to serve this area. The following facilities and services are either available or can be
e~tended to this annexation area.
Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The city indicates
there is existing 6-inch water line located in Hayden Bridge Way. Service to new development
within the annexation area can be provided by this line. Following annexation, the City of
Springfidd will withdraw the property from the Rainbow Water and Fire District in accordance
with ORS 222 and the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) will provide services to the annexation
area. An intergovernmental agreement between the water district and SUB and state law will
determine the orderly transition of services and finances between the two service providers.
Electricity - Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides electric service to developed properties in
this area of south Springfield. New development in the annexation area will be served by SUB.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 200S
Page IV -A-5
ATTACHMENT 1 -14
EXHIBIT B - P13
Police services - Springfield staff indicates that Police currently provide service to other
properties in this general area already inside the city. After annexation, this proposal area will
receive police services on an equal basis with properties inside the city. Infill annexations and
development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery to this area.
FIre and emergency services - Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by the
Rainbow Water and Fire District. This special district contracts with the City of Springfield for
fIre services to territory within the district's boundaries. Upon annexation, the annexing area will
be withdrawn from the fIre district and SpringfIeld will provide fire services directly to the
annexation area. Springfield fIre stations are located near Pheasant A venue and Hayden Bridge
Way, S 471b Street and Main Street, and S 681b Street and Main Street.
Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene,
Springfield, and Lane Rural FirelRescue to centIal Lane County. The annexation area will
continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan.
Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup
coverage for each other's jurisdictions.
Parks and recreation - Upon annexation area to the City of Springfield, the annexing area will
also be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Park and recreation services
are provided to the City of Springfield by the park district. Indoor recreation facilities, such.as
the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community
Center, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents as new development
occurs. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools
and parks throughout the community. Also available..are pathways and several categories of
parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and natural area parks. There
is one park currently located in the vicinity of the annexation area, Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre
neighborhood park on Blackstone Street. Other nearby recreational opportunities include
Harvest Landing and Page Park.
Schools - Springfield School District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-Guy Lee elementary,
Hamlin and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood; however, the annexation area does not
contain any residential dwellings an~ should not generate any additional demands on the school
system. . :
Wastewater - Springfield staff indicated tat the existing church within the annexation area is not
currently connected to the city wastewater system. There are three possible connection points for
extension of wastewater service to the annexation area: an existing 6-inch line within Blackstone
Street northeast of the annexation area; an 8-inch line that extends south of Blackstone Street
roughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the east property line of the annexation area;
and an 8-inch line at the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane
(approximately 500 feet east of the southeastern comer of the annexation area). The public
wastewater lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the city limits.
However, extension of a wastewater line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 - ]4) - February 7, 2008
Page N-A-6
ATTACHMENT 1 - 15
EXHIBIT B - P14
Orchard Lane along Hayden Bridge Way would be outside the city limits until the right-of-way is
annexed.
Upon the annexation effective date. the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.510(2)(c)].
Stormwater - Springfield staff indicated that roof runoff is directed 'onto the site and passes into a
series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin system, stonnwater
infiltrates into a drywell. There is an existing IS-inch stonnwater line adjacent to the annexation
area within Hayden Bridge Way. Approval from Lane County is needed before connection to
this system may occur. Any further development or redevelopment in the annexation area will
require appropriate stormwater management techniques in accordance with city standards.
Streets - The annexation area abuts Hayden Bridge Way on its south side, which is fully
improved with curb and gutter, pavement. sidewalks, and street lights. An interconnected
transportation system will be required in order to provide access and a transportation system for
the provision of fIre and life safety services to and from the annexing properties. Hayden Bridge
Way is not located within the Springfield city limits.
Solid waste management - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the
Lane County administered landfill.
Communication facilities - Various providerS offer both wire and wireless communication
services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the
market have the capability to provide service to future development in this area.
Land use controls - The property is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary.
Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the
city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The city will continue to
administer land use controls after annexation.
The minimum level of key urban. facilities and services, as defined on page V -3 of the Metro
Plan, are either immediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame
as needed. This request is consistent:~ith this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan'seconomic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan. as it is an incremental step in
implementing the long-range plan for this ,area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and
policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan
community. The existing and proposed uses are consistent with the long-range plan for the area
and will fulfIll the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C Sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 200S
Page N-A-7
ATTACHMENT 1 - 16
EXHIBIT B - P15
lbis request is consistent with this boundary commission standard.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The boundary commission staff recommends that the proposed annexation to the City of
Springfield (BC File C SP 08 - 14) be approved as submitted based on the following fIndings
and reasons.
The findings are organized to respond to boundary commission standards outlined in ORS 199,
the boundary commission law. The following fmdings and reasons are based on approval of the
request as submitted. If the boundary commission modifIes or denies the proposal, the [mdings
and reasons would need to be adjusted.
Findings:
1. This proposal was initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield after
receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance with
ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to be a valid fIling under OAR 191-006.
2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (T17S R03W S23 Map 34
tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the
International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a
church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield.
3. The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General P~an (Metro Plan).
4. The annexation area was zoned LDRIUF,low-density residential with urbanizing fringe,
in Lane County. Mter the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR
consistent with the land use designation.
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
5. The boundary commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the
public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties
were given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
6. Mter annexation to Springfield, the annexation area. would be withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water and Fire District. There would be some financial impact on the district
because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was developed
with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn from the district through
separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On behalf
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - ]4) - February 7, 200S
Page N -A-S
ATTACHMENT 1 ~17
EXHIBIT B - P16
of the City of Springfield, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly to the
annexation area.
7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Lane
County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District in accordance with ORS 199.5IO(2)(c).
8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.5IO(2)(c).
9. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as
the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within
Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. .
11. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services
to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule,
implementing policies (1), (2), (5), and (7).
12. The proposed annexation was the means of bou~dary change outlined in the Metro Plan
and the boundary commission administrative . rules for ultimately providing urban
facilities and services to this territory. . Annexation of tax lotted property fu1f'llled the
Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary:
13. The proposed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary
commission law and the Metro Plan.
14. This request was consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard.
,
Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
. comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d)
15. .The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro
Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as
subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted property assisted in fulfilling the Metro
Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary~
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 - ]4) - February 7. 2008
Page IV -A-9
ATTACHMENT 1 - 18
EXHIBIT B - P17
16. The Metro Plan recognized annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority
for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas.
17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring
urban levels of development within the urb~ growth boundary.
18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy
#8, page ll-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a
timely manner.
19. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental
step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land
uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the
metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for
the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
21. This request was consistent with this standard.
Reasons:
1. The proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner.
2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan.
3. The services required in the Metro Plan were either available or could be provided in a
timely manner when needed.
4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting
annexation to the City of Springfield.
5. The proposal was consistent with boundary commission administrative rule policies.
pt: LCBC: L:\BOS N\2OOlf1CSPOB14 :iN.DOC
Lost Sav~d: F~bTUQry I, 2008
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 - J4) - February 7, 2008
Page N-A-10
ATTACHMENT 1 - 19
EXHIBIT B - P18
Map No. IV-A-l Vicinity Map
Annexation to Springfield (International
Chmch of Foursquare Gospel)
C SP 08 - 14
}~~~~:,
A
tl
,
I" 0; -,.CX>O
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 2008
Page IV-A-ll
ATTACHMENT 1 - 20
EXHIBIT B - P19
Map No. IV -A-2 Site Map
Annexation to Springfield (international
Church of Foursquare Gospel)
CSP08-14
j
Blackstone Sl
Qj
l!
-
en
=
CD
.;.: ~,-.. . ~ :" : .0
;r _: :~:.; . .
;~~~f;~~{;-: .:.:,:';~>~t{. }~~~.
i
-
CD
.!
-
C/J
=
- Il)
. Royal
DeDe
.AUt
!:IIJ-
... ._- ...--
: ANNEXATION AREA
.' Includes TI...s 12600, 12700, 17-Q3-23-34
Owned by the International Church
of Foursquare Gospel ::,
BCFileCSP08-14
::.H~y~_e.n Bridge Way
":. _..~ '-':" .- . .. .
.' ---'
~r -~~ '
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 -14) - February 7, 200S
Page IV-A-12 ATTACHMENT 1 21
EXHIBIT B - P20
RESOLUTION NO 07-59
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXA nON OF CERTAIN TERRiTORY
TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT TIlE LANE COUNTY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXA nON
WHEREAS, the City received a request to annex approximately 4.13 acres into the City of Springfield on November
22, 2006, said territory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600
Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this
Resolution.
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is
adjacent to the .city Limits; and, .
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon receiving cons~nt
in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent
from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of
the land in the territory proposed to be annexed and of real property therein representing more than half of the
assessed value of all real property in the territory proposed to be annexed;
WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property ownerS of the territory signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); and,
WHEREAS, there are no registered electors in the territory to be annexed (Exhibit C); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.070~ ORS 222.111 and other
. applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the territory in the annexation proposal can be
provided with the minimum key level of urban facilities and services in an orderly and efficient manner as defined in
the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, Page II-B-4, and where there will be a logical area and
time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and, .
WHEREAS, minimum level of key urban services and facilities are defmed in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area
General Plan, Page V-3 as sanitary sewer service, stonnwater service, solid waste management, water service, fIre
and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use
controls, communication facilities and services, and public schools on a district-wide basis; and,
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key urban
facilities and services, with the exception of City stonnwater and sanitary sewer, services which are available within
public streets near the property; and,'
,
WHEREAS provision of City stonnwater and sanitary sewer services has been arranged through an Annexation
Agreement that has been negotiated with City staff and the property owner, as described in Attachment 2, Case
Number LRP2006-00030; and,
WHEREAS, an Annexation Agreement has been proposed for execution by the City of Springfield and the property
owner (International Church of the Foursquare Gospel operating as Springfield Faith Center) which will memorialize
the Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum
level of key urban services and facilities as required for an affIrmative City recommendation fat the annexation
request; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request
to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when an Annexation Agreement is entered into by the
City of Springfield and International Church of the Foursquare Gospel (Owner);
ATTACHMENT 1 - 22
rJ
EXHIBIT B - P21
- .
NOW TIffiREFORE BASED ON TIffi FOREGOING RECITALS, 1HE COMMON COUNCIL OF 1HE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recom:rpend approval of the annexation of the
subject territory to the City by the Lane County Local Gov~ment Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said
territory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600
Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly descnoed in Exhibit A of this
Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of Springfield and
approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City. Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation upon
execution of an Annexation Agreement as described in the recitals.
Section 4: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Final Annexation Agreement which memorializes the
Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of
key urban services and facilities.
Section 5: The City Manager shall forward this Resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request to the Lane
County Local Government Boundary Commission.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, 2007, by a vote of
6 for and 0 against
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, 2007.
City ~,bun...
ATIEST:
r.r-=''.1-:.,;Jr-n ,~. ,..:cr;[H:JI\UED
r....." .....dL,"'" ...~ uT. ftUV
A:~ -; 0 .ORM
~b_1tlj L~"
-, f!'.""'c. " a ~ I Q- .
!JI',I_.~~
Or-riCE OF CITY ATTORNEY
City of Springfield, Oregon
CElmAED TRUE COPY
~Jaw~
City R order
ATTACHMENT 1 - 23
~l;'c;:nTTT'T'Tnl'\T Nn n7_,Q
EXHIBIT B - P22
EXHJBIT A
-......... .....
- 3!!IlI
- ~~ i
CD CII::J "
e -e '.
- Blackstone S1. - ~~
UJ : " n
~ = ~
(0 ..
, '.
. '. " , ':-.
- l} , . , ..
"- CD .' ' ,
e .".: .' ..
./ Blac, kstone S1. '
J - , , Royaldel Lane. ,:;;
UJ
: , "
= : , .. .
Il) " , .' .' ..,
- .. :j'"
. '. ..
'. . ..
~,~"~ '.... . .' ,
Royal .. ,.
..
Delle .. .' '. " ~ : l":: . :~l.~
parle '.., \ .. :.;.
-.
..' '.
, .. .. . :~
. CD River Knoll Way ..~~,'..
., ..
c:: .' l:..~l:;
CD
r.W ..J , , ;;"::.;"
'E ."
',' Vi .'~~~.. .~ .~ C'II r/ ,,~
L.. . . ..c:. "
_ u
Cambridge st,' '! :5 0
y-~ '.
u - ..
_ 0 ,
I-....j ~ .~ :.
aa ',' , ,
i . ." :'-: ..
I l ' .
. :::
'.,,~,~,....,~
"
Hayden Bridge Way :.". .-.: :
. -" . ........
.':,:. . ;''':);":~<,:';'~';:~;~~t'
-
..... . ..;:.:
. '-... , ,
<
.. :..;.~
.. ~ . . :;f.::-:.
CD ;' r:" ~ '.:
, . .... ~.
e - ~. , ':..
- CD '. .,
- ! t..,.
C/J 3!
= .. ~
--..- UJ
10 CII . ,
:5 i .:..N. :~,:
--.J .....
lIJ , . :'. ~
":\. .:~ :..:.;"~~~
. Not to .Jeale
Legal DescriptioD
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, NotificatfonNo. 3810, in Section 23,
. Township 17 So~ Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; thence South 010 01' 15"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 890 53 ' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 000 0 I' 15" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89053' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number SO that is marked by an iron'pipe; thence South 00013' 30" W~st 319.50
feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by perpendicular measurement :from the centerline of said rOlld; thence along said north margin of
Hayden Bridge Way, North 890 53' We~ 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon;
thence North 00001 '15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron
pipe; and thence South 890 53' "East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
less. .
A TT ACHMENT 1 - 24
EXHIBIT B - P23
EXHIBIT B
FORM #1
PETITION
ANNEXATION ,TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
. . .
TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
We. the undersigned, constitute the oWners of at least one-half of the land area of the property described
in the attachment marked "Exlnoit A'" AND
We desire to be annexed to the City of Sprinifield. A map is attached marked ~"bit B.... showing the
affected teIIitoI)' and its relationship to the present city lD;nit boundaries.
The ~exation constitutes a minor'boundary change under the Boundar). Commission Act ~d should
therefore be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study. a Final Order should be entered by the
BoUndary Commission. '" .' . .' . . .
Date .Tn1 y Ei. 'nnF\
B Date July 6. 200fi
.By Date
By Date '.
MAP# 1-7 - 03 .....2-3 - sL/ LOT# (":J...f- 00
MAP# (7- 03 -)..3 - 3<( LOT#- )).. 7l5()
~
With the above signature, I am v'erifying ~hat I have the authority:to
consent to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm,
agency 'or trust. .
s
ATTACHMENT 1 - 25
EXHIBIT B - P24
VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS
I have caused a search to be made of the assessment and taxation records, Lane County
Department of Assessment and Taxation (A&1), on 17-03-23-34-12600 and 17-03-23-34-12700.
'those records reflect that the International Church of the FourSquare GOsPel are.the owners
. of record of the property identified by th~ tax lots described on the attached sheet. . A&T is not
responsible for subsequent deed activity which may not yet be reflected on the A&T
computerized taX roll.
~ ~dA-Iu-
Lane Couuty Department of Assessment and Taxation
11/14/07
Date
I:\A TINFO\BusinessProces"~~m'fnfq1y2"'6erification fmm.doc
. 6/27/07 .
PETITION FOR rtJ ANNEXATION TO DISTRiCTS 0 FORMAl'ION OF DlSTRICT
011 . SIGNATURE SHEET
TO THI! COUNTY m.Rcr;ONS FILING Ol'1'I~m:mCT 0"- .~ l'-? .... J (;'I' e \ d
PETITION I.D.
THIS IS A CITY I DISTRICT
PETITION. SIGNERS OF THIS
PAGE MUST BE REGISTERED
VOTERS IN LANE COUNTY ONLY.
~GN~~~ DATI: SIGNED PRINT NAME usmlENCI: APDRDI ~AP & TAX LOT ..0. aEllI.
&IO/UA YIYlL .lTJlEJ:T. NUMBER" CITY U\\....... OWH&a
1. ~ YrN.4A 7/6/06 B a's kin ARRt. Sa: . . 1910 ~ - t 7 -o;),,~~ .3Y l::l'~
~. I Tim J C". w. 1\ I' In?-^ -l. '") ~-.rY 1.:1. 7'~t"i
~/l ~ L- I -7/06/06 ste~ lUU t I'
. "'./l .....- Lvnda J. Gunton. Asst ( on os AnlieleB .CA g( 026
3--:- U. L U . . -
I'
~ 4. t',
.....): 5. ,t' ".
.C ....
~ 6. . '
,,.
:.:: 7.
.
B.
I 9.
..... 10.
11. . .
-
12.
13. . ,
14.
IS. '
16. .
17.
. .
lB. ,
19.
CIRCULA TOR".S VERIFICA TJON
. ~
THIS VERIFICATION MUST DE
SIGNEU BY THE CIRCULA,TOR
SIGNA TtJIm OF ClRCOLA T
SHEET NUMBER
CIRCULATOR'S ADDRESS (stre't
~~ :<<~ ci.,.p1'-~ R..d~
.~ "........., 'tL,~ .<-4...~ ,,_1 ~ ...... b
....
0
ti
:ij
0
- '
.~
U
;El
. . Ii
0
~:
'I ~
.' J:
l! OJ
.... ' -1
0
u (')
III
0
oS
~ .U
B lE
'l:l f'"
''''
U
P.
:n ~
B (J)
I. 6
t:::
.r;; .
tl
G ~
.<:l Q
~
EX H I BIT B - P'2 6
FORM #2A
'CERTIFICATION OF REGISTERED VOTERS
I hereby certify that if signatures on the attached petition are registe~ voters and reside in
the area descnoed in the petition. These signatures represent not less than SO percent of the registered voters
residing within the annexation or withdrawal area described in this petition.
. ,,~;..:.~ ....~~,~~
~ . "t=~~'\Y C.~'-
~ ~OJu>~)~~J'
Lane County, Oregon '~i ~ ... 6
. ~., ~o~
.... (\~~.. o-tf."-';'
'tJ;'j ".-,,;":'...,1,! .~
~o-J J... \ ;;).. oQ. -, -;;'L~,*1'1
Date
~.
A TT ACHMENT 1 - 28
EXHIBIT B - P27
Informational Attachment
F or the proposed annexation of :1::4.13 acres of property located at 600 Hayden Bridge Way. The area is descnoed
on Lane COmIty Assessor's Map 17-03-23-34, 11.. 12600 & 12700. The legal description of the property follows:
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23,
Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian; Lane County, Oregon; thence South 010 01' 15"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 890 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 000 01' 15" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence Soutli 89053' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; thence South 000 13' 30" West 3 19.50
feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of
Hayden Bridge Way, North 890 53' West 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane COmIty, State of Oregon; ,
thence North 000 01' IS" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly eXtension 560 teet to an iron
pipe; and thence South 890 53'.East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
. less.
Zoning
The Low DensitY Residential (LDR) zoning of the subject property and existing use is coilsistent with the
Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and the City's Development Code. Churches are listed as a
Discretionary Use in the LDR District. A site review permit for the church was issued by Lane County in July,
1984 and upheld by the Lane County Hearings Official in September, 1984 (Case PA1315-84).
Sanitary Sewer
The existing church is not currently connected to the city sanitary sewer system. There are three possible
connection points for extension of sanitary sewer to the property: an existing public sanitary sewer line within
Blackstone Street northeast of the property;.a public sanitary sewer line that extends south of Blackstone Street
roughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the east property line of the site; and a sanitary sewer line at the
intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane (appro.ximately 500 feet east of the southeastern comer of
the site). The public sanitary sewer lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the City
limits. However, extension of a sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard
Lane would require approval of an extraterritorial extension along Hayden Bridge Way.
Solid Waste Management
The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise amngement for garbage service inside the city limits. Upon
annexation, Sanipac will serve this property.
Water Service ,
Rainbow Water District is currently serving the site with water and will continue to do so mItil the July following
the completion of annexation, at which time SUB Water will be the provider . Water service to the property
originates from a 6-inch water main in Hayden Bridge Way. '
Electric
SUB Electric is currently serving the site with power from an overhead line running north-south along the western
boundary of the site.
Fire and Life Safety .
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application ~d has determined that fire and emergency services are available to
this property. The building has an existing fire sprinkler system and there is a fire hydrant at the southeast comer of
themte. .
Police Protection
Upon annexation, the area will receive police protection from the City of Springfield. Police protection and
response to priority calls can be provided to this site.JlPQn anIlep.tion consistent with service protection throughout
ATTACHMEN'-l -~~ .
EXHIBIT B - P28
the city.
Parks and Recreation Prog:raD18
After annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject property will be within the Willamalane Park and
Recreation'District boundary. City residents receiv!= park and recreation services from the District. The District
operates two aquatic centers, a Community Center, an Adult Activity Center, and 31 parks containing a variety of
outdoor recreational amenities. There is one park currently located in the vicinity of the annexation area: Royal
Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park at 401 Blackstone Street. Among other features, the park contains an open
play area, basketball court, playground, picnic shelter and tables, ~d night lighting. Other ne~by recreational
opportunities include Harvest Landing and Page Park. A complete listing ofWillamalane's parks and programs can
be found on-line at www.Willamalane.oflt.or.at 736-4044.
Although the site is zoned LDR, there are no occup~ed dwellings on the site and none ~ proposed. For this
reason, the property should not generate any additional demands for park and recreation facilities.
Land Use Controls
. The City of Springfield Development Services Department has provided all planning and building functions for the
owners of the subject property. The City of Springfield Development Services Department will continue to provide
land use control for the site after the annexation.
Communication Facilities
Qwest and AT&T currently provide communications in the area for cable service and an array of wireless
companies provide different communication services. The City has no exclusive franchise arrangements with
telecommunication or wireless companies. The field is competitive and therefore guarantees a wide selection.
Public Schools
Public School services are available through School Distrjct 19. Page Elementary School is located just to the east
of the subject property. As stated previously, the site does not contain any dwellings and should not generate any
additional demands on the school system.
Stormwater Control .
Roof runoff is directed onto the site, and passes into a series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the
catch basin system, stormwater infiltrates into a drywell. There are existing public stormwater facilities adjacent to
the site within Hayden Bridge Way. Any future development or redevelopment on this site will require appropriate
stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards. Approval of an extraterritorial extension is
not required to extend private stormwater lines through unincorporated areas to serve the site.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 30
EXHIBIT B - P29
Office of the Secretary of State
BILL BRADBURY
Secretary of State
Archives Division
MARY BETH HERKERT
Director
800 Summer St. NE
Salem. Oregon 97310
(503) 373-0701
Facsimile (503) 373-0953
February 19, 2008
Lane County Local
Government Boundary Commission
Pallia L Taylor
99 East Broadway, Suite 400
Eugene OR 97401-3111
Dear Ms. Taylor:
Please be ad~ed that we have received and filed the following Annexation(s):
Ordinance Number
Our File Number
Date
C SP 08-14 (Springfield)
EC EU 07-50 (Eugene)
AN 2008-0018
AN 2008-0019
02/14/2008
02/14/2008
Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexations through the application of
ORS 199.519 '
Our assigned file number(s) are included with the above information.
Sincerely,
d~j~ I3~..JL
Linda Bjornstad
Official Public Documents
cc: Lane County Clerk
ODOT /Highway Division
PRC/Poplliation Research Center
Revenue Cartography Section
WWW Server - http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us . Internet E-mail -reference.arcmves@State.or.us
Oregon Genealogy Listserv - or-roots@arcmve14.sos.state.or.us
ATTACHMENT 1 - 31