HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 02 Franklin Boulevard Study Update
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
March 17, 2008
Work Session
Public Works QU)
Tom Boyatt.~
744-3373
30 minutes
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY UPDATE
ACTION
REQUESTED:
Provide staff with direction regarding moving ahead to amend local plans to include
the Franklin Study Design Concept for Franklin Boulevard and the McVay/Franklin
intersection.
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
Staff is seeking Council direction to advance the Franklin Study Design Concept by
amending TransPlan (TSP) and the Glenwood Refmement Plan to include the
concept, and to seek" funding for NEP A documentation (EIS or EA).
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - DRAFT Franklin Boulevard Concept Study Report
Attachment B - Franklin Boulevard Study PowerPoint Materials
Attachment C - Franklin Boulevard Concept Map
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
The Council has placed a priority on realizing the redevelopment potential of the
Glenwood Riverfront area. It is generally understood that attracting higher density,
high quality, mixed use Riverfront redevelopment depends in large part on an
associated overhaul of Franklin Boulevard. The adopted 2004 Glenwood Riverfront
Plan includes placeholder concepts for Franklin Boulevard and the Franklin/Me V ay
intersection. These concepts tend to isolate the Riverfront Opportunity Area from
Franklin Boulevard, as well as propose a 'double one way couplet' of four traffic
signals to address the travel demand on the Franklin/Me V ay intersection.
The current Franklin Study refines the original concepts by bringing the edge of the
Riverfront Area onto Franklin Boulevard using modem multi-way boulevard design,
and by replacing the four signal "square about", with a modern two lane roundabout
at McVay/Franklin.
The next step in the process of project refinement planning is to go to the Planning
Commission then the City Council this Spring to amend the Glenwood Refinement
Plan and TransPlan to reflect the evolution of design. It is important to understand
that actual design will be further refined with subsequent project development steps
likeNEP A evaluation, detailed traffic analysis, more refined project cost estimates,
and value engineering.
Attachment A - DRAFT Franklin Boulevard Study Concept Report provides a good
summary of the 10 month refinement planning process. Attachment B - Franklin
Boulevard Study PowerPoint Materials, is a slide presentation of the planning
process and the design concepts being forwarded. Attachment C is a strip map of the
Franklin Boulevard Study Hybrid Concept.
DRAFT
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT
Boulevard Study Concept
port
J
Introduction
Between May 2007 and March 2008, the City of Springfield and its consultant team led by
CH2M HILL considered and evaluated improvements to Franklin Boulevard from 1-5 to
Nugget Way and to the intersections. The improvements included arterial and multiway
boulevard options. The project's study area extended from 1-5 to the west, the Springfield
bridges to the east,' the Willamette River to the north, and Nugget Way to the south. The
process of developing and evaluating options relied on input gathered from a 17-member
Stakeholder Advisory Committee, project open houses, and meetings with the Springfield
City Council.
This report documents the alternatives considered, the screening process, andthe
development of a preferred alternative as well as the public and agency involvement
process. For clarity, the north-south section of Franklin Boulevard/McVay Highway is
referred to as the McVay Highway in this report.
Concept development and selection
rked together to develop a
rk for comparing concepts. The
and evaluation framework is attached to this
criteria in the following categories:
Project purpose and evaluation fram
The project team and Stakeholder Advis
statement of project purpose
Franklin Boulevard Study
report. The evaluatio
. Cost (proje uisition)
. Natural envi stainability, relationship to the river, environmental impacts)
. Community va a economic development (multimodal access, development
potential, impac to the existing business community)
. Transportation performance (freight, intersection performance, local and regional traffic)
The project team developed measures for criteria developed by the Stakeholder Advisory
Committee.
Concept development workshop
In August 2007, the project team held a three-day concept development workshop aimed at
generating a complete universe of improvement concepts for:
. Franklin Boulevard from 1-5 to the Springfield bridges.
3/12/2008
CH2M HILL
ATTACHMENT A - 1 of 6
DRAFT
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT
. McVay Highway from the Franklin Boulevard/McVay Highway intersection south to
Nugget Way.
. The intersection of Franklin Boulevard/ A Street/Main Street (Franklin/McVay
intersection).
. The intersection of Franklin Boulevard and Glenwood Boulevard.
The concept development workshop included the consultant team, city staff representing
the Springfield Economic Development Agency (SED A) and the transportation and
planning divisions, the general public, and members of the Stakeholder Advisory
Committee. The results of the design workshop were presented to the City Council for their
approval.
Cross sections
During the concept developlpent workshop, three potential cross-s~r,:;:tions were developed
for Franklin Boulevard: improved arterial, multiway boulevardg~cil hybrid of the
~ultiwa~ bo~levard and arterial cross se~tion~. One cross-~,e~~Il:!hat included a travel lane.
ill each duection, a center turn lane/medIan, sldewa 4"15lk~'ar~~s was agreed-upon for
the McVay Highway,
Concepts set-aside at design workshop
The alignments shown below w
. The "blue" concept would have encroached on the Greenway and reduced development
potential near the Willamette River.
. The II green" concept would have required expensive relocations of major facilities such
as the Lane Transit District headquarters.
3/12/2008
CH2M HILL
ATTACHMENT A - 2 of 6
DRAFT
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT
. The "brown" concept would have required development on four frontages of the
Franklin/14th couplet to create an activated district and would have reduced traffic flow
on Franklin Boulevard creating a less attractive retail environment.
. The" red" concept would have impacted residential areas and would have created a
bypass that would compete with Franklin Boulevard for retail development.
Comments from Stakeholder Advisory Committee membe 'S and the general public
supported the team's recommendation to set these concepts aside.
Concepts advanced at design workshop
The project team developed concepts to realign Franklin Bouleva
widen Franklin Boulevard on its existing alignment either to
and to the south. These concepts, 14th Avenue alignmen
Franklin widened north and south, were advanced
development workshop.
4th A venue, and to
or both to the north
ned south, and
",r the concept
Intersection concepts advanced at desi
The project team also develop'
intersection. The team devel
like option (also refe
lin Boulevard/McVay Highway
.. option, a signalized option and a couplet-
Concept design wo
At the conclusion 0
consider the followin
. 19n workshop, City Council directed the project team to
'ne concepts for improvements to Franklin Boulevard:
1. 14th Avenue Multiway Boulevard
2. 14th Avenue Arterial
3. 14th Avenue Hybrid (half multiway boulevard/half arterial)
4. Franklin Boulevard Arterial, widened to the south
5. Franklin Boulevard Multiway Boulevard, widened to the south
6. Franklin Boulevard Hybrid (half multiway boulevard/half arterial), widened to the
south
7. Franklin Boulevard Arterial, widened to the north and south
8. Franklin Boulevard Multiway Boulevard, widened to the north and south
9. Franklin Boulevard Hybrid (half multiway boulevard/half arterial), widened to the
north and south
City Council also directed the project team to continue studying a three-lane enhanced
arterial concept for McVay Boulevard. They also directed the team to continue considering
a roundabout option and signalized option at the intersection of Franklin Boulevard and the
McVay Highway.
Concept evaluation and narrowing
The project team then evaluated the nine concepts against the agreed-upon criteria. Some
criteria or criteria categories were not used in this process as they did not help differentiate
between concepts. The detailed concept evaluation matrix is attached to this report.
3
3/12/2008
CH2M HILL
ATTACHMENT A - 3 of 6
DRAFT
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT
The criteria that best differentiated between alternatives included:
. Minimize project costs
. Minimize right-of-way acquisition
. Minimize impacts to businesses and residences
. Minimize impacts to private property
There were some trade-offs between the multiway boulevard and arterial options. The
multiway boulevard options all created a better pedestrian environment than arterial
options because sidewalks were adjacent to low-traffic roadways. The multiway boulevard
options also separated local and regional traffic better than arterial options. The arterial
options typically had lower project costs (excluding right-of-way) than the multiway
boulevard options.
The 14th Street alignment option would be more difficult t
of the existing alignment options. The existing alignm
south had more impacts to businesses and priva
widened south concept.
ct in phases than either
to both the north and
e existing alignment
The existing alignment widened sou
boulevard had more benefits e
could not be compared t..
project team and Stake
com bined see .
widened to'
the improved arterial and multiway
the other options. The hybrid options
way options at this stage of design. The
mmittee agreed that a hybrid design that
tiway boulevard based on the existing alignment
ed for further design.
The project team compared the costs, benefits and impacts of a roundabout and a signal
treatment at the corner of Franklin Boulevard and the McVay Highway. The signal and
roundabout options had similar construction costs, right-of-way impacts and building
displacements. With the current level of transportation analysis, both treatments are
expected to accommodate future traffic demands.
The Stakeholder Advisory Committee preferred the roundabout treatment because it
provided an opportunity to create a gateway site as you enter Glenwood from downtown
Springfield.
4
3/1212008 .
CH2M HILL
ATTACHMENT A - 4 of 6
DRAFT
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT
Signal treatment
Roundabout treatment
Preferred concept
The project team developed a hybrid option that included segments of the improved arterial
and multiway boulevard cross-sections. This preferred concept inc,' an improved
arterial segment, a segment with multiway boulevard treatme sides of Franklin
Boulevard, and a hybrid segment with multiway boulevar. . the north side of
Franklin Boulevard and enhanced arterial treatments th si ranklin
Boulevard. The Stakeholder Advisory Cornmitt e una y endors d this concept.
The Stakeholder Advisory Committee prefer
riverfront plan and community go
stakeholders. The Stakeholder
as a concept that can be modifi
Next steps
The Stakeholder AdvI
work continues on Fra
ecause it advances the
ile reflecting the input of
e requested that the design be identified
opment.
mittee requested that the following items be addressed as
oulevard and the Franklin/McVay intersection:
. Seek to minimize right-of-way and business impacts.
. Provide a continuous bike route and safe pedestrian crossings.
. Ensure that the roundabout provides adequate truck access.
. Ensure that the roundabout provides enough traffic capacity.
CH2M HILL
3/12/2008
ATTACHMENT A - 5 of 6
FRANKLIN BOULEVARD STUDY CONCEPT EVALUATION
Criteria categories Criteria Measures ~..... _".'.."'.m'.'
widened south widened center
:::,~~ Hybrid Multiway Hybrid
,.},: \- ;.; boulevard -
1. Cost Project cost (unit costs for roadway Minimizes project cost (High- lowest __00_0 0 - 0
and urban design features) project cost)
3. Community values and Promotes mixed-use, clustered Minimizes right of way a.cquisitions on - - 0 - - 0 - 0 0
economic development redevelopment in Glenwood. the north side of Franklin
Benefits the future business Has potential for phased implementation - - - - - - 0 0 0
community as a whole.
Provides for the safety and Provides sidewalks adjacent to low-traffic - - (~ - - 0 - - 0
convenience of pedestrians roadways
including alter-abled people
Provides for safe crossing of Franklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Boulevard (all have the same crossing
distance for the arterial portion)
Provides for safety dnd Provides bike lanes or other bike facilities - - - - - - - - -
convenience of cyclists
Provides for efficient operation of Accomodates a separate lane for transit - - - - - - - - -
transit
Minimizes impacts to private Minimizes impacts to businesses and - 0 0 - - 0 0 - 0
property and businesses residences (structures)
Minimizes impacts to private property - 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0
(total right-of-way)
4. Transportation performance Accommodate long-term traffic Minimizes travel times on Franklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - -
..'
needs Boulvard J
Maximizes through-put on Franklin - e - - - - - - -
Boulevard
~
Accommodates local and regional Provies for separation of through and - - 0 - - 0 - - 0
traffic local traffic
~
>'I
>'I
~
n
:c
3:
t'l
Z
>'I
~
CO)
o
":I
CO)
.
High( meets criteria well -- 3 pts
o
Evaluation framework graphic,xls
L_
TOTAL SCORE
30
30
N/A
27
27
N/A
27
28
N/A
Medium/ meets criteria somewhat-- 2 pts
. Low /meets criteria poorly -- 1 pt
Not applicable/could not be measured
at this level of detail
o
10/30/2007
~
1-:]'
I-:]
~
n
:::r::
~
tJ:j
~
I-:]
tJj
I
Franklin Boulevard Study
I-'
o
tij
. W
--J
Study report and recommendation
Project overview
· Franklin Boulevard
~
t-j
t-j
~
()
I · McVay Highway
t-j
to _ improvements from Franklin Boulevard to railroad
trestle
- improvements from 1-5 to the Springfield bridges
tv
o
tTj
~ · Intersection of Franklin and McVay
. .~
. .
. ..
Decc~~~o[nJ p[Jocce~~
~'
f-3
f-3
~
()
::r:
3:
I:Ij
Z
f-3
tJj
w
o
I-Ij
W
-..J
~x
:.r~
,~
'; ....
.....
..~
.....
v
4
.,..:
v
....
'-..
~O
.~
~
:t:"
~
~
,:r:> ,
In
't:r:
'3:
tI:l
Z
~
.tJj
I
I'
I I
,.*" ,
I
io
i"I1
w
'j..
o
, G..
,2
! -
,
. WINTIER.20:0.1c-1008:.~
..... .., ... ", ~ .,. 1
Devel,op
preferred~ .
con~ept loa!,
hi,gher 1~:\leJ
I 'ofdefaU !
Evaluate
~ ,'+
Intersection
types
JULY 201.1
Establish
committees
FALl. 2007
AU~=U,sT2Q07 .
Hol~ design
w'Qfkshop
Analyze and
evaluate.
alternatives
SPRING 2008
Planning
Commission
recommen-
dation
City Council .
decision
'"if'
Identify
a'iternatlves '
Select
preferred
co ncept
for further
refinement
Develop
evaluation
framework
. 'j,'
-', '-
Understand
existing
and future
conditions
Project purpose
.Promote the implementation of the city's
~
~ land use plans and community development
::r::
8:
~ goals for the Glenwood community
t:d
I
lTl
o
I-Ij
~ .Provide for safety and convenience of those
walking, biking, driving, using transit and
delivering freight
~
~
1-3
1-3
~
n
:r::
~
t<:l
z:
1-3
tJj
0'\
0
t-:Ij
w ~
-..J
i:li
~
""il
~~ ......~
. "",.~-" ~!,~~,-;~--,~
_itp
.,,~
~ {l~
l:, 5'~.J: , :' '\:,' ';~:~;::~:'>'~ 1',,; ;7,: ';, i:: " "
Access:,tofbusin:esses i's, '
" " ,,~'ri\};r'\'!?"; ; ~ " , ,'" ,:,,~,
,~frt~~uent and ,fr~''11Jor..
across), through travel
, 'lanes
Develo ment matches street desi
.D:~~~I().~:R1e.rit:.i.s
r::i,nf~(3piate:lya:~j:~~tfr)p:t to
:a:rte~ri~1I ,~'id~~a,l!ksC! re
~, " "" ,'" '''''':"'' ' , <~ " ,"', '} 'Ii: ^ " ,'.{ ,
;'n:ar:tow:or, hij;rieji'stent .
'"' / I' 4:~"";'~" ,Y oil ~^," \'~'~>,~}:~:~" ' '<if"",
:J;::l
f-3
f-3
:J;::l
()
::r:
3:
tr:J
!Z:
f-3
lJj
....J
o
I-Ij
W
....J
Franklin Boulevard today
Development matches street design
Through lanes
provide arterial
function, speed and
capacity
Development is
adjacent't9 l.ow-
traffic stre~t"
sidewalks ,are wide"
and welcoming ,
~
1-3
1-3
~
()
::r::
3:
tr:l
~
1-3
td
ex>
o
t-:I:j
W
-.J
,""" .'<
...... "
Multiway boulevard
...
'~...- ~
'l,!!b - ~.... .~.
4~~~v:#~~:~:~~7~_
\'l;
^:~-.~
~~~.
."
"0
~
.~~
" ,
?
. "
G
'G {1- Q:t .0
o
<l>
"
(J
'"
"
'0
"'0
"~\i ~
.aO
~o ",~.o.d9G <>
,,(; I>
~,""
,I')
&
.} "
.;
<~
Ill!
-~
.~-
'Et3-
..
,s:fl .
"'7~~
"'-- '
t
~"
..;... ~>"~~'"-
~'" ~,,;f!'?
~
_'l
~
"ii-
~
"
" .~
Q' fl ~
~ ~"o '"
~!w ., ,
"".flIi ," -
o ~ C-:I
~" '
(1
_0
o
~
".
o
(fie 0
Q(l 46i)
j)
"
" <>
:J::l
~ Initial screening
.~
!2:
1-:3
td
I
f--'
lJl
o
t;:j
LV
--.J
Developed alternatives
· Held a design charette in
August 2007
- consultant team and city staff
- Stakeholder Advisory Committee
- public workshop
: · Reviewed range of .
-.J
alternatives
with City Council in September
2007
~
t-3
t-3
~
n
::r::
3:
tIj
~
t-3
tJj
f-l
0"\
Evaluation framework
· Cost
~ · Natural environment
t-3
~
(1
; · Community values and economic
t-3
~ development
I-'
-...J
~ · Transportation performance
-w
-...J
Criteria that mattered in evaluation
~ -Minimizing cost, property impacts and
1-3
~ business acquisitions
3:
t:r:J
~ -Separating through and local traffic
I
~ -Establishing comfortable pedestrian
I-xj
~ environment
~v
~
. .:"~.".L,"'C~~";"~,"", "..'"
..... ."..' .'> /4.//' ,,4 ",' , :
// ,- <./ ",/ /'
E ~ ~m .
:va~uadOn summ ry
Frank~~n~
w~dened south
Frank~in,
widened
center
14th Street
alignment
~lUJ~tt~c
. way;
~
1-3
1-3
~
n
::r:
3:
t:r:J
2:
~ Cost
ffi\IT1<?; rfn @) ~
~ OJ] ~ftD c
o/f!J@jYJ
+
=
~
=
~
I:lm
f-1
\.0
~ Commun~ty
~' va~ues
Transportat~on
. performance
{=
{=
/
W
=
=
=
~
+
=
+
IiiiIlD
~
(+) meets criteria wel~
(if) meets criteria
{-) does not meet criteria
~v
~~.
i,~~
Fr nklin alternative
advanced
· 3 alignment alternatives
- existing alignment: widened to the south
~ - existing alignment: widened from the center
n
I - 14th Street alignment
t-3
to . 3 cross-section alternatives
-- enhanced arter~al
-- multiway boulevard
- hybrid: multiway on one side and arterial on
the other
tv
o
o
I-Ij
W
-..J
I~
\,
,'~
.~~
;J::I
1-:3
~
()
::r:
3:
t:r:J
Z
1-:3
tJj
I
tv
I-'
o
'"Ij
w
-..]
SAC recommendation
Process
· SAC developed draft recommendation
~ · Draft recommendation was shared at
t-3
~ public open house
3:
~
~ - over 1 00 people attended'
td
~ - comments both supportive of the concept and
~
~ opposed to it
w
-l . SAC reviewed public comment and
developed final recommendation
~y
.~.~~~
.~~
:J;:l
t-3
t-3
:J;:l
n
::r:
~ Franklin Boulevard
IJj
I
[\J
W
o
t-]j
W
...J
SAC recommendation
· Advance a Franklin Boulevard hybrid
~ concept with both multiway boulevard
::r:
g and arterial segments
IJj
I
N
~
o
I-xJ
w
-....J
~y
........~
Franklin Boulevard
Study
Glenwood Area
HYBRID
CONCEPT
<<g.""
:t::'~4;;"'St;.~
! ~C.~{"'Y.lUo
1t-3
I~
'. () "" -)<''''''~'''''''~~
; ::r: "" ."".",. ~
: € l.X~~W'.l1rt1
t,Ij
~~<tl\>>,Cflt'ir'l!'''-~
i=j ).A>Jf'jIIf'~'O(I~,,~...'l1 I
tJj
\
\
tv
lJ1 ~.
o
I-zj
. '
I'!I
II!
*]
" "l
" II j!i .,
J
.P
tJ** ~
~
It
<Ml.IpXW!~Yi$1:QEt~.~e~i~g~~g;;~~g~~~~~~
'CiI
I:'
t
I-'
I ~
In.
.iD
~...
",,0
.,.
Ci'l
~
-
, .....
, . ---~
.... ..- ":;:;Z::
, *~... '!:
, ~"~
~
:~
n
'{
i~.~~~~'~':
'.1$" .'1
........~~ r;
_ ~>(.1. , l
l' _
~
,
;
~fi~it=~..~
irr'I!..,,_,:_:ti...~f""'_~1iii ft'~,,-~_.. ~~_"_~_'1!.4<~L..,..L""':4.":~'~"'"'"
~~,
~ ')
oil .)
jj
~~'f~
;;J
i~~
fi7~~~~
I f ::!j'&iC,~i""i"
Items for additional study
The SAC requests further work on the
following:
~
t-3
~ · Seek to minimize right-of-way and
t:r:J
~ business impacts
I
~ · Identify the design as a concept that can
I-J:j
~ . be modified to fit with development
· Provide a continuous bike route
~
Glenwood to Henderson
r P\~,(,~SF,I)
. ~lGHT Of WAY
~
1-3
1-3
~
n
:I:.
3:
~
Z
1-3
tJj
tv
(X)
~
" '. f'.,J'
.... :,
;. ~-;<L?:;
~I' "
;:-"'fJ'"CI' (.-{'~
~~.at.I:~~ p-
~ 4"'....
o
t:Ij
t ]3'
I ......"
P;..RIo:I~ I]J.N:
f
W
-.J
'-~
~-
~.,~, tJJ;":.
f.l - -11. ..Jfi1 ~ 11-'
- A~ ,r J'. t
~~ . .., ""-'J=f.:"
'~tr r"""":':"':'-l1
~7';' ~
;.0" -- 1 U I
T~AVEl
~ANI;
1t
L~,
T~""Bl
I,Ji:N~
. ~'AOPOS8D ".
.,.1iT OF WAY ,
~
i
6' i 8.' i
/"'. /, )
[IJlCf 2\S.iALLEL
LAi-!: PAR~:lt~Go
1.3'
S':I:\:\'!I'ALK
t
!
11'
ilRA'o'EL
I!AN~
J
24'
a.u:
TilA''''a, "'.,N;~
~
1 ]'
T2A....R
1,At.e;
1
"'.
IHOROtlGH'.ARE
-'--~ ---------1
AI(Jl'O$t.[):it <')'.w
~
~~
rr~:PCl~frs
u....iT or WAif
0:
>Ij;
w.
~t
'I'
18
~JrIEwJ(!."
.'
Henderson to Mississippi
"~I ~ '. ..' ..;J~, ~~''',dJ'
."'..~~! -"-,.'
.~:~..-;~ ~n~l
~fr>""" .#!
"t.... .,' _...:1
., ~~P,;Pi,V:~ T-..
(,.t ,';"'t '..i.s"':/>-'
~ t".l~ f--"
> {I
t . _ ._~--r- ~
I
I
rHl
t~51
.~.- ~_ t
18'
......j ld.&:!
~lI'o!C
:.i'
12J ~~
jqlil.~l
t4NE
~:
r.
AOOE$$ ~II;
'{
'v'
~1
~
~
'~
'w: .
,~--..
#q: ~~,
,~
t~~.~.
,",... ~
------, -----....
~ (~::-="!_,~ ,.2' C_.' ,
A~ r ~ E:~ r
~:~r ~~::-~
24'
I
j
I
,
I
- ~
~<~'r.
~:
IT-' i"":
l'
I ) I
11l.il....El
l.~!;I
~1-:
~:
.il'.
t
, ~3j. ,
.,
. ,';/'
..
...) I f.'i,.,::"'.
~
, .
'i.'
l':?
l'~,"E l
WU
.AC(~S$ LANf
.1'1I0'~~
llY.::rJ1'~ WJ>.v I
I I
1 "_~"'I. ~~CltT~~k I
l~.di:hllr.
i
I
~
~
. ~-~
, i ~..
I '
1: '
I
,.'
1
I
I
,
It:;' j
FIJi.f'.\1I'f.!;;.
$1Yli p
, ~'
l
1 J,
13'" - ,jI'. TI .,'
l'l!b....i:11 Tp:,l."o'EL
!#i l.~!iiI
E!4:.;
r;:,s.~.I..~.l'iE:;
~O~QUJGtiiF.-Aml~
!/'2'
r~:::q;:]SD P.::t\'!=l'.
, !l.il,'J:5.
tU.ft
. ,
f 1{1' .~.
!>I.iIf'l. Ilk(;,
S.1U"
:J::l
1-3
1-3
:J::l
::r::
~
tr:l
Z
1-3
IJj
w
o
W
--.J
Mississippi to Brooklyn
1:.t1'J.}:.;I~~
:1I~JCiHT Of W".1
ROCJi'IJ~ "
Gl(iHT 0;: WIo'( .,.
. i
. :'>0"1
':
..,."1.,...~"":'.~
~. ':'f.. -L.;
. ('\.,,: ']a
~k '~"'10 ..'c....
~ :;(~"'.I .~ 1
'~ "-.,/1 -;
~ '\.~ :"".,
~
"":
l'~ -- : \ . -=.;.;;;.;"
~i'T ~ ~~E - I~
~ ~ LA.:.....l L -.
I"'" ~ --r-; . -.->1-
f~-1r . ,r;:;r; .' , I ,.,,-. I j =,
__.I !...~. )1' , "I' Ii: ,', '''f
_~--._i~.._ .._. '-'__"_' -_..,..
2.1'
E,....i;
n....\Ifl. [...;.itS
T 1. I ·
"''-11'-.o'--n.3'---.i-6_8'~1]'-t
nl''''!. nv;.u m.e f"""'"u~. ~4uEw...,lI';
I,ANIi t.."", lANE >,A.R<II-Ji;j.
,
~T .....
. 16' ' 18'-----.<-1-2'
Sl[lf......lU.F; Al',n)l!!'D I1D"''lr...
~.ol,[ll~....c. ~hJ.JE
I .\L J.
Il11~13'----+--11'-.."
1',-Ilr~N~ .i. 1l:A}"U ;;&;"'1<:..
,-nL> . [..Nt l-'>L;:
!
I
1
ACC"S LANIE
fiHOIlOUGHFAJtE
l
I
lSr J
f1I.(1~~1l D.CW.
~
~~
~
1-:3
.1-:3
~
()
::r::
8:
tr:l
Z
1-:3
lJj
I
. W
I-'
o
I-Ij
W
...J
Franklin/McVay intersection
SAC recommendation
· Advance roundabout concept at
~ Franklin/McVay intersection
n
::r::
3:
trj
Z
f-j
tJj
I
W
!\.)
o
tij
W
-..J
, .
,
, ,
,,- .,. , -
, .
Items for additional study
SAC requests work to ensure that the
~ roundabout:
()
::r:
3:
~ · Provides adequate truck access
tJj
~ · Provides enough traffic capacity
o
~
~. · Minimizes business and property impacts
· Includes safe pedestrian crossings
~
~
.I'~
Fr~n_k!in/lY1cY~y intE3f?ect,io
: ."" . :;'..I.J"- ,-' ~./
,'tij ". ,/
~ ~'~. . ~
;" ~,
~.,#~."-
\" -~fc ,
\. -::~ .
(1,'1; i', ..
\ \ \ '\(, \'.:.
">:'~::~.. \'\ ,~\\::, '
\~\\ ". \\\~ "\\ \
,\" \\ \....
'~\ \, \',
:~" "', . :\ :
", \, ,,'\..,., .",~. , ~ - /1 /:
~\,<~ '),., ' '~;"<, \/;/ . J
, .', ~,"~' ~:f; f,.
?:'.~,~ ~,,"-~;,.. / \/ /'
':--... '-_ '>'.' './ I
. .'" .,.:""= '- '- (f ""'\
.~, "
\, 't
... "J,
,";-..~.. ~
, \ ""'~' ~
,. "
r:.-,'- '>,"'" '.
I ,~, '",", ...;.
":; ~".>,:,~S'~; ~ ,,",'
I ":'~~... ~~,\ "..
!....--;-
,l "
\ .: \1\'
! ,\ "\
\,~, '\,
\ \ \.,
. II ~\i' ,
, .~~. '"\
I \.
'/ ".C,
1;:-
/,\
'...rJ'{'1.,
" '\ \\". \
i,ll \' \
.,-y 1'",_
II ~
1.1
Lr
~
1-3
1-3
~
n
::r::
:s:
t:Ij
z
1-3
td
.,
, '
71"""'1
r _ Ii
........=..)
~ .~.
FAANI<t!.N BL\!O.
,;;.<::;_:;;; ~c
-~.."""'""--
t:~~0~
i
h
~~-._...J ,';:"
~~~J7"'-;..7f
;-j::::"'i':;&~Ll- _
I ~'--:--.
,
w
~
f'
o
tij
"l
-.......
w
.....]
I.
...l! ,
., I UI
'.~
~ "Z-
1,(1"~
o
, 0
~
! ,
.,1
, -
f -
,I<.
I
~TIWY.
i:~
.\ ':,
'L /"
" , .>/>'-
, . <;:>.;/
.//
c/o/./'
." ~;;
../:
n
"
",'
~g,: .
I.
\1,
'~I
\\
'\'
I
I
~
-,
I
':
.'
'.
"'-,
\,
''I
\
..
I,
\
\
\
\,
\.
\
\
\
\
\,j
\.
, I
'":.......
:--... ,"
"':;.,'
.J
/
: j
T
\'
.~
t~~_
Roundabout and signal
v
1 :
aye.
~=~ ~i:;~ :!::cc;;:...~~
::r::
3:
.t:t:L
Z~
1-3
td
I~
,(![:It
r~
"I
~;
U;\
G), %
,n ,~
.;:;J '"
r;\
,I
,~_."_____1.
~-''\
.1:
~....
:.....
Why this recommendation
· Supports riverfront plan
~ · Provides improvements to Franklin that
~
()
~ will support realization of Glenwood's
~
~ potential
w
~ · Is a plan developed with the help of
w
" stakeholders rather that by a developer
· Is a proactive plan that will ensure that
changes to Franklin are done right
i<il',;tI~~iI'i
1llIl
~,
G
i'
'l\\\il l1"'>(('-
,'" JiI'
~ ~'
~
~,,,.,,,
., ,,' ~
,^' . . "',~ ,.
~ c', ' - . '"'f"
.;"tr.
';"~ ~~ 1ft
~
ii!l ~ 'il\l
~; ~
~ JIl ''''
etrl,'Y'l
~
';I;
~
,);:
~
~
'll
M ~
tg
*"~~:},f.
, 'H
*
~
". ~ ~
: 't.
.
~ "'
ill
,~
" ",'il f ~~ ,fii
:~!~'k; ~ /P
i1/l!""
.. tlm
Ill."-
"
'iI
.v#i lif.
~
91
':1'
~ ~
,~
'"
i'1lI
,r~
p
III
'"'.. ,1lll
III
:-.
..'-.-J
;0'1 ~ 00
~
i;';?
~
~l\
" I
!$<<r,' ~
~
~
~ @
\t
~
"'Mo,
I'~!\\ ~ "
". '01 Iii
~ 't\i~ ~ s("#
pj
~~it
~g.' ~,~
'!l! ~
'\fi ~;: ~~ lI!
e!" /!Il
~~ '~~~I ~~ ~
~ .' l ,$ 'iil ,p
~
.,,,al
:~,~
~
\'!l
..
'"
]l;
$;-
"
.vw
~~~;@
'!"!
'.
~!>l'J5 ~~ ~;,.;:}'J~ -~ .:' ~
Ct~;;~~
~ ~1'Ii
~~~ 'i
'"
"' OOi\lil'!" ft! '" IIli
....
~
ill<
~~
<:<1
'"
rn'L\'~n: ~ ~i
~
'"
'!Ii
t
,',$
1tf';
~
~
ilT.
~
II
~
~ '"
"
~ ,t;}~ ~
Iii
~ '"
!>!'
~ ':1(., ~'IJ !I.il
If;! ~.~ ..}
..fl\1~;... .' i!;!
".;f '~,...
" Iii ~
~'1 rU ,.~~ ~
.
,..i'/"'
"ri" -
, ~'
"
...
~
,
ii$\ m~t
':e~ l~ ,_l d;
'M r- ...;,~\
-!<'l ~ ...----l !f.....
- .' tl~
~...Jl ..
~~ I
"'~'"
,> i!i:l
~~ \:lSi'J
ill! 'I p' I~,
t:'
~
~ ~ M ~
ill iii ill
"*
~ '"
~
dM ;t. f. \'
'~t J'
_ J.ll
1, ~
~~ ~ m
'Il ~
~
~
~ ,,,,.~,~ oIlI
. ,..,...
.. \l!l~,
@[{11
'Ot""~
..
.,,,:!/iii.,,
.~. ~ ti'r;.; ~.~ ~f"~
II 'i~ ,~
.,
"II~>
..
;f'.c.....~ rt
~r::1 11
't}
~
fiI
!<'i
~ g, ltl'
'/IfJ
!!!l;
!Ii
ii1< j :ill
~3
'"
rI""
~
~ 'Iilo ~
~
p..o/w
~ 'II
.~
~~ if],
Ii,;
~
II!
;~:i~i ;&;
'"
iW
~
~
~
ik. 'li>T.
,Pll/ Ii-'
it. ,~
Ii!'< flI
~
ill i!l 'Iii ~ iIllIli
~
"!! ~
'iii' tiIIl_ ~ilio .11'1
,. ~'llJ oil il!I\lI 'ffl
~
~i'l \io ~ ~ r:
!Ii >lI) t ., ''f~~ III t~
i11l!l !iI '" '." ...."..: 1ll""o1, ~~
III
~
i&~
~!I~ Wi1.~f.:
{jl '1t tI !'.I'm ~ ~ 'ii! "'"
!&"~ i!\l.;, ~ ~ ,
rl$, ~ ~ ",..~ II>>! iii!' ';;pi
.. ,~<#; 4 ''f ill
,'~ !II 'lli';!! 'ii ~~ i! I ~
~ 1f@"I'i,~ t >i< ~
.. ~~" Iil~~~
~ I ill" It-\
'" ., ~ ~~, ~ ~ ""I "'1' '" !I!"
l' f ~ f1!'.~.j,~ '~I~"~ ~!;~q; .. II" ... ~ ~
~,,","~ ~tt ~ ~<ui!",l1'iifj' ~~. '" ~ '. lll\1!
~ .. II' ~., ~ ~ i ~ ~ " ,pl1o Ii
1r:rt~ ~./ -~ ~ " ~~ . ~~ .~. ~
:- i.tI ifI'r.', "t":..D", i? 1] iJllIl ~, ~ 1\1. ~
. :""'. ~...~ 1..1' .1 ....,.. '" '%\
<i;f,;\";' f!! ~.' 1~ ~~~" ,..: ~SJ; 't~'" '1',
"''l'''')~''''':Il;'.,,~ liI'h- ;!! " ~ l/,j ~ ~
~" ":r't ~ ~ "~-' \-
'0'" ~' 'Ilf .""01 ."'14 .
."''''. '" "" - ~ !!Ii
~~;J~'~
~ "" if1/;*,
q ~_i 'lloolfll"~
"', ~
'!l
~ !ll' 'Ilt
~
'ii'
0'.
.,
;$S
~
11'
;;'lI
\.~
'" ti'
tmil ~~?~
'"
f0
~ ~ ~'"'1J't
I!l'l
it'!
,,~ ~
~ I'll. ~ ~
ffi
~~
fr
I'}".~
Ii'
~
~~~~ ai41 ~
~
\!il 1~1 ,;jl1
',? -~
"
m! Il!i
"-"".~
Ii;.
'\li
'iff
"
iili
~
Ii'
~- III
'" ~,
iii
~
l!I; IlIl
.. {\~~Z.,
f" ,.'~
!II!
ill
~\ r;< ~ III
~~ R
II' ~
\i!!i
i!i
fi.
.
l'< , ~
..
f
"
ill
~
~ " .."'
Ii< ~
'J!j,A .~",:",;
~
J'
fI
fj(
~
'1i
!l'
ii1>1 '" 1l'llI 51 II!
~ ~ ilIo'" ;IllI
iil
..!II\~~
!If ~!!I
~
~ rn"~ ~ If>
- -~ ','Ij GI ~
" '^, 'l1il 'll$ fiiiiil .1 '"
. " - - ."",/, ~
II ~ ~"ll<~ili~~~ .,.;t!' '2""1. " ·
~~''''''~ ,I .:r~1'.
~ ~'.IiI"fili,",' ~I :~\ iii' ~ Iii. .~1' I,ti
\,.." .,,:. "<.. ,', '1
fffi..., , .,rJ: ,'li.l, ,~"'\" ~ :If" 1i!r'
ill ., ""i ' ~ '".. ~
~ ~ 8'" "',~.'" "'" ',~, l'b :.'..
"-:; , ::.;~.
'i'; ,!!i',,"\1(
1li
~ ~~"
'~~''!ll
~'"'ii .
~ t'il
I1i!' .~I'l
'IE "'#II! Ii ,,. ~
'~1t1 ~ ;/Ii
. "" ~ ;1J
~il! ri,iIa 'iii ~~.~ ~':i>1
.. ..,. '"
~"I ,:J/} ~.
W;r~~~ ~ii\<
"~ ~
~~:- ~ 1m
@ fj1
\lI, s
~ >\1i1 !l!
~ ~
~
~ ~
iJ
'iI~ ,(/j ilfll
i!
III
~
~ ~
~~
d-~'"i
~ III
'Ill~ IIm,;j?
I. ~"
~
Jf:" III 1;: ~,
1';' ~'t""~
~ ~
~
'i1'~", jil
=!;" ~ ~
," . ~ 'l,;
III
t.a,!t~
" I'
III!' I\i
rI,'
ill
(&4\ ~ (J!?, fI&l.~ \\?t lIi1
~. ~ ~;.,~1! m
l'~. ~"'_. ;J,t'
,.J \.. ~;:. .(:.11<"
,~ .. .~:;', 'I!l~
. ,. .
\, ~
~~ 1\
"
'"
~
'il
ti
!'7'
~
!Ill
Wdftm
iIt1
..~ 1!J
H
~
!~
~ ~~ .:~'~
~1f!J"Ji..If~ IJII
"".. '
~'i~1!lJ
IU: 1Iim~\ ell ~,~ K"
~
~
~
~
R
,!
~
III