HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 25 Thurston Fire Station #16 - Public Comments and Project Status - P20534
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Departmeot:
Staff Cootact:
StaffPbooe No:
Estimated Time:
January 22, 2008
Regular Session
City Manager's
Carole Knapel
726-3672
10 min
. SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
THURSTON FIRE STATION #16 - PUBLIC COMMENTS AND
PROJECT STATUS - P 20534
ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider the Public Comments and Project Status for Thurston Fire
Station #16 and select one ofthe following options;
1) Determine the preferred Schematic Design option and direct staff to
proceed with the preferred design; or
2) Direct staffto return to Council on February 4,2008 with a detailed
itemization of the public review comments; or
3) Direct staff to make modifications to the Schematic Design and to
return to Council on February 4, 2008 with the modified design and
with a detailed itemization of the public review comments
ISSUE STATEMENT:
At the January 14,2008 Work Session, the staff presented three
schematic design options for the Thurston Fire Station # 16 Project. At
that time, staff advised that two Open House sessions had been scheduled
in order to obtain public comment about each of the options.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Council Briefing Memo
DISCUSSION/ .
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
. ~. '; ::'\\
.'" '.".-.;.
. At the Council Work Session on January 14, the staff presented three
schematic design options. The cost of each option is as follows:
',\ :r . '-,1"
Optioo Cost Approved Const. Cost Differeoce
Single Story (Pitched Roof) $1,697,000 $1,766,750 ($69,750)
Two Story (Pitched Roof) $1,955,000 $1,766,750 $188,250
Two Story (Low Pitch Roof) $2,051,000 with stucco $1,766,750 $284,250
Two Story (Low Pitch Roof) $1,979,000 w/o stucco $1,766,750 $212,250
At the time of the Work Session, the staff indicated that two Open House sessions had been scheduled to
provide public comment on the designs. The Open House sessions have been scheduled for January 15
and January 17,2008. Staffwill compile the public comments and present the comments to Council
,during the January 22, 2008 meeting.
In addition, during the next two weeks, the project team will meet to determine if any further reductions
can be made to the construction costs for any of the proposed schematic design.
At this time, Council may determine to select one of the proposed schematic design options and direct
staff to proceed with the design of that option. In the alternative, Council may direct staff to return on
February 4,2008 with a detailed itemization ofthe public comments and/or possible modifications to the
schematic design options.
Subject:
January 8, 2008
Gino Grimaldi, City Manager
Carole Knapel
Thurston Fire Station #16 - Schematic Design Options
COUNCIL
BRIEFING
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
ISSUE:
On October 15, the City Council authorized the project team to begin the design of the new Fire Station
#16. The approved project includes approximately 9550 square feet with a construction budget of
$1,767,000 and it will incorporate Best Management Practices for the design and operation of fire
stations. Because ofthe site limitations, the project team has developed a two-story schematic as well as a
single story option.
DISCUSSION:
The attached schematic drawings indicate the design options which have been developed by the project
team. Each of the options includes the space requirements and adjacencies which were approved in the
Functional and Space Program. The two-story option has been further developed to demonstrate a pitched
roof and a low-pitch roof.
Single-Story Option - Pitched Roof
This option includes 9545 square feet of space and provides all the required space for apparatus and
equipment, living areas and administrative areas. The cost of this design option is estimated to be
$1,697,000. The annual payments for the fmancing of this option are estimated to be $235,000.
The advantages of this option include the following;
· The cost estimate is within the approved construction cost budget.
· The single story design may be considered to be more consistent with the design of surrounding
residential properties
The'disadvantages ofthis option include the following;
· The design uses more of the site. The existing station is approximately 5000 square feet. The new
design will nearly double the size of the facility to 9545 square feet. This design will therefore
limit the options for future expansion of the station.
· Because the single story option uses more of the site, there is a limited area for outdoor staff
training. The project team has indicated however that the available site training area would still be
acceptable.
Two-Story Option - Pitched Roof
This option includes 9653 square feet of space and provides for the apparatus and equipment, living areas
and administrative space. The cost of this design option is $1, 955,000. The increased costs are the results
of the need to add an elevator, stairways, an increased number of windows and doors and an increased
amount of site work. The annual payments for financing this option are estimated to be $268,000.
The advantages of this option include the following;
· This design reduces the footprint of the building to approximately 5585 square feet. The reduced
size of the building footprint allows for future expansion space for additional apparatus bays and
living areas if a future Council should determine to increase the size of the station at this location.
· The reduced footprint allows for more outdoor training space for the fire crews.
The disadvantages of this option include the following;
· The cost of this option exceeds the construction budget by approximately $188,000.
· The pitched roof option will require a minor variance which would need to be addressed in the
Site Plan Review process.
Attachment A
Page 1 of 10
Two-Story -Low Pitch Roof
This option includes 9653 square feet of space in the same floor plan as the pitched roof design option.
The cost of this option is estimated to be $2,051,000. In addition to the cost increases discussed for the
pitched roof option (above), there are added costs resulting from the exterior wall treatment provided in
this option. Because of the low pitch ofthe roof, the project architect is recommending a stucco exterior
for this design. If an exterior wall treatment is used similar to the pitched roof option, the cost could be
reduced by $72,300 for a total estimated cost of$1,979,000. The annual payments for financing this
option are estimated to be $284,000.
The advantages of this option include the following;
. This design reduces the footprint of the building to approximately 5585 square feet. The reduced
size of the building footprint allows for future expansion space for additional apparatus bays and
living areas if a future Council should determine to increase the size ofthe station at this location.
. The reduced footprint allows for more outdoor training space for the fire crews.
. Because of the lower profile, this option would not require a minor variance at the Site Plan
Review process.
The disadvantages of this option include the following;
. The cost of this option exceeds the construction budget by approximately $285,000.
ACTION REQUESTED:
No action is requested at this time. The project team will present these options to the community during
the Open House sessions scheduled for January 15 and January 17,2008. The project team will return to
the Council at their Regular Session on January 22 with information gathered from these Open House
seSSIOns.
./
Attachment A
Page 2 of 10
STAFF ENTRY
10
...
ci
2
2
0
~ i=
~
0 I-
~ CIl
a w
" a:
~ u:
C
..J
W
u:
~ .
2 ~
ii: ~
ll.
CIl Ii
-CD FLOOR PLAN - SINGLE STORY OPTION
9,545 sq. ft.
1/S" - " -0"
DRAWN BY:
CMHll
CHECKED BY:
PL"
DATE:
12-0J.07
TInE:
FLOOR PlAN
SCAlE:
1(8"_1-'0.
LEGEND
. APPARATUS SPACE
L.JVlNG SPAce
SHEfTNO:
. ADMINISTRATlON SPACE
1
Of 10
< 0
.-<
.j.J
s:: 4-l
Cll 0
I':l
.c C""l
u
cO Cll
.j.J O[J
.j.J cO
< p..
;",
j;
.'.!
l;:
-CD FRONT ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
'/8" "" " .O~
EBLEFT ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
_. _.. 2 ................._.._._......................._.........._._.................~..._...............__........._............m.."...n............................_.__..._..___........_....U.._..nUn.nm*............._............................................_.........._......._
11S" - l' -0'
EBRIGHT ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
-.....- 2 ......_....__.._..........m_m..n._................._............nn___.................._..................n........................................___m.............._...._......................,,_...._......................._...n......................._........
11S" - l' -0.
ffiBACK ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION . - I
_ 2 _____... ._~___~________~...~___......!....___.____.__~_
" 1 1/8" .. l' -0"
,"
f .',_
..
U)
~
c:i
z
z
0
~ ~
<l:
0 I-
0 III
~ W
~ a:
" u:
~ 0
....
W
u:
Cl Ii;
Z ~
ii: ~
c..
III ii
<:0
......
.I-l
P4-<
Q) 0
S
.c~
()
C\l Q)
.I-l bO
.I-l C\l
<:p.,
DRAWN BY;
CMHU
CHECKED BY:
PlB
DATE:
12.03--07
TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
SCAlE:
118w_1.'OM
2
't'..
t"
ROOF SYSTEMS
PREFABRICATED WOOD TRUSSES@
2.... OC WITH PLYWOOD, FELT; <to YEAR ASPHALT
SHINGLES.
'INTERIOR PARTITION SYSTEM
sTAGGERED STUD WOOD FRAMING WITH SOUrlD BATT
INSULAllON, GYPSUM BOARD 'AT EACH SIDE FOR SOUND
CONTRoL. 048" CMU AT ALL WALLS IN APPARATUS BAYS.
TURN OUT STaR.
APPARATUS
BAY
IT WCISHWR HALL
. EMS STORAGE
ffiSECTION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
__. 3 _.,..................................._._._..._............_......_....._....._.......,.._,......_............._............................................._........................._"___......______n.._....
1/8" = " -0"
('
, . ~',
'\
EXTERI R WALL SYSTEM
STANDARD WOOD FRAMING WITH GYPSUM BOARD
INTERIOR FINISH, BATT INSULAllON, PLYWOOD SHTG, FELT,
CEMENT BOARD SIDING WITH BRICK VENEER WAlNSCOTTlNG.
CD
...
ci
2
2
0
~ ~
<t
0 I-
~ IJJ
W
~ a:
~ u:
~
< C
-'
w
u:
(!:l to
2 ~
1r ~
ll..
IJJ
<0
.-<
+J
l=ll.H
Cll 0
]tr)
U
cU Cll
+J 00
+J cU
<P-<
EXTERIOR WINDOW SYSTEM
STANDARD VINYL WINDOWS WITH INSULATED, lOW E,
TINTED GLA2JNO, & TRANSOM UGHTS FOR NATURAL
UGtmNG AND ENERGY SAVINGS.
DRAWN BY:
CMHll
CHECKED BY:
PlB
DATE:
12-03-07
TITLE:
SECTION
SCAlf;
118-.1_'0"
3
i:1
.', <,
STAFF ENTRY
PUBLIC ENTRY
co
..
c:i
z
z
0
~, j::
0 ~
" fIl
~ W
M a::
~ it
~
< Cl
....
w_
it to
Cl
Z ~
ii:
ll.. >
fIl
EBFIRST FLOOR PLAN -TWO STORY OPTION
.m._ 4 ._........................._......._.......................'...._m....._............_._m__..____._...._.....__...mmmmm____.__.._._._..m____m__.m__.m_..................._.'''........................'''..................."...,...,......
9,651 sq. ft.
5.585 Sq. Ft.
118M = l' -0"
LEGEND
DRAWN BY:
CMHII
CHECKED BY:
Pl.
DATE:
12-03-07
TffiE:
fiRST
FLOOR PLAN
SCAlE:
118"_1_'0.
APPARATUS SPACE
UVlNG SPACE
. ADMINISTRATION SPACE
4
<:0
.....
+J
~4-l
ell 0
t=i
,.c::..o
u
Cd ell
+J co
+J Cd
<:P-<
'4.068 Sq. Ft.
<D
...
ci
2
2
0
~ i=
<(
0 I-
" III
~ w
" a:
~ u:::
C
...I
W
u::: Ii;
Cl
2 ~
a: ~
a.
III .
ffiSECOND FLOOR PLAN -TWO STORY OPTION
--5__.________.___....................__.................._.........._.___............__............._..__._..........._................__.............___......__..........._........____.__.....n.n.._____m.___mm_mm._._.............
9,651 sq. ft.
~ .
1/8" "" " _OM
LEGEND
APPARATUS SPACE
LIVING SPACE
. ADMINISTRATION SPACE
DRAWN BY:
CMHII
CHECKED BY:
PLB
DATE:
12-03-07
TITLE:
SECOND
FLOOR PLAN
SCAlf:
118~.. ,.'O~
5
<X: 0
.--l
+J
P 4-l
Q) 0
1J r--.
u
cO Q)
+J 00
+J cO
<X: P-<
EBFRONT ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION Ii..
.___n 6 ___........................._.............._........._._.._.................................._n....._________.._____.________.___._.___.~_........._......,.._._........___._....._................._..:....:___.....c_____..~--..-__:___:_-_---__::____:
1/S' ~ I' -0"
EBSIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A-
.........6................__...____....._____________________..._......_..._.........._..__._......_.__..................__..........._........................__._....._..._.........._............__.......................____.__mmm__._________
EBSIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A
.. ..... 6 _~......._-_-.:;::....._.._............._.-...........-----_--------..........,.............._._................._~___________......._.,......___....._..........,...._......._,______.........._..........................""..
l/S" - I' -0"
liS" = l' -0"
EBBACK ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A
........_6........._._...._..__........_..__.......____.__._.....______....._........__._......._....____...................:...........__.__..........._......__.._......................_m....m....._........_............_.__....___.._...._....._.__...
1/a~ = " -0"
CD <0
.... .-<
-lJ
ci ~lH
Z Cll 0
z t=l
0 ,.ceo
i= CJ
<l: Cd Cll
I- -lJ 00
en -lJ Cd
W < p..
a:
it
c
.... '
w
it -I;;
Cl
Z ~
a:
D-
en
DRAWN BY:
CMHIl
CHECKED BY:
PlB
DATE:
12-03-07
TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
SCALE:
118-.'-'0.
6
ffiFRONT ElEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B '
._.......7............_........_...............__.............._..........._.........__..._..........._m._n................._.....__....._.................................._............_........_.___m..___n.............__..........._......._.........._........__.......___-:-_............._...._._._............._............H.....
1/8" - I' -0"
_CDSIDE ElEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B
_Q)~IDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B
1/8" = l' -0"
1/8- = " -0"
__CDBACK ElEVATION - TWO_ STORY OPTION B
1/S" = l' -0"
(Q <t10
... .--<
ci .j..J
~4-l
Z Q) 0
z 13
0 ,.c:0'\
t= U
c:( C\l Q)
~ .j..J bO
lI) .j..J C\l
w <t1 p...
a:
u:::
0
...l
W
u:::
c:l
z
ii:
Q,
lI) s
DRAWN BY:
CMHII
CHECKEOBY:
PL8
DATE:
12.03-07
TInE:
ELEVATIONS
SCAlE:
1/8-_1.'0.
7
ROOF SYSTEMS
T Jl TRUSSES@24"DCWlTH PI. VWOOD,
4 PLY MDDII'IED BUILT UP ROORNO
FLOOR YSTEM
T.II WOOD TRUSSES WITH 3" GVP-CAETE
TDPPltiG Sl.AB OVER PI. VWOOD SUPPORTED 'MTH GLUE
LAM BEANS. (WlL.L REQUIRE CNU WALLS TO 2ND FLOOR)
INTERIOR PARTITION SYSTEM
STAGGEREO STUO WOOD FRAMING WITH SOUND BATT
INSULATION, GYPSUM BOARD AT EACH SlOE FOR SOUND'
CONTROL. eMU AT All WALLS IN APPARATUS BAVS.
EXTERI R WALL SYSTEM
STANDARD WOOD FAAMlrtO WITH GYPSUM BOARD
l"lERJOR AraSH, BATT IHSULAnON, PLYWOOD SHTG, FEL.T,
STUCCO RNISH wtTH BRlCKlSTONE VEHEER WAINSCOTTING.
eMU WALLS AT APPARATUS (EXPOSED OR COVERED)
KITCHEN
PHYSICAL
TRAINING
DINING
ROOM
.
0
CD ~
...
ci f
Z
Z ~
0
~ j:::
<r:
0 I-
~ (Jl
W
" a::
~ u::
< C
....I
W
u::
c:l Ii;
Z' ~
ii: ~
II..
(Jl i
APPARATUS
BAV
EXTERIOR WINDOW SYSTEM
STANDARD V1HYL WINDOWS WITH INSULATED, Lowe,
TINTED GLAZING, & TRANSOM LIGHTS FOR NATURAL
L1GH11NG AND ENERGY SAVUtG5.
CD~=~~'?~~,~~? ~~?~~?~~I?~~
ROOF YSTEMS
1/8" = " _0"
PREFABRICATED WOOD TRUSSES@
2.4" OC wtTH PLYWOOD, FELT, .40 YEAR ASPHALT
StaNGLE$.
EXTERIOR WINDOW SYSTEM
DRAWN BY:
CMHll
CHECKED BY:
PlB
DATE:
12-03-07
TffiE:
SECTION
SCALE:
118".1.'0"
FLOOR SYSTEM
TJI WOOD TRUSSES WITH 3" GYP-CRETE
TOPPING SLAB OVER PLYWOOD SUPPORTED WITH GLUE
LAlli BEAMS. {WILL REQUIRE eMU WALLS TO 2ND FLOOR}
INTERIOR PARTITION SYSTEM
'" STAGGERED STUD WOOD FRAI\IING WITH SOUND BATT
INSULATION, GYPSUM BOARD AT EACH SIDE FOR SOUND
CONTROL CMU AT ALL WALLS IN APPARATUS BAYS.
EXTER OR WALL SYSTEM
STANDARD WOOD FRAMING WITH GYPSUM BOARD
INTERIOR RNISH, BATTINSULATlON, PLYWOOD SHTG, FELT,
CEMENT LAP SIDING Yt'1TH BRICK VENEER WAINSCOTTING.
eMU WALLS AT APPARATUS (EXPOSED OR COVERED)
IQTCHEN
STAI'tDARD VINYL WINDOWS WITH INSULATED, LOW E,
TINTED GLAZlNG,I. TRANSOM UGHTS FOR NATURAL
UGHllNG AND ENERGY SAVINGS.
APPARATUS
BAV
~
_CDSECTION - TWO STORY OPTION B
8
118M"" l' -0"
"
0
< ,...,
+-l l.H
P 0
Q)
] 0
E'-I
()
tU Q)
+-l 00
+-l tU
< ~