HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 04 Thurston Fire Station #16: P20534
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
January 14,2008
Work session~
City Manager's Ice ,
Carole Knape ,
726-3672
30 min
ITEM TITLE:
THURSTON FIRE STATION #16
P 20534
ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider the Schematic Design Options which have been developed for
the Thurston Fire Station Project and identify additional alternatives for
consideration at the January 22nd Council Regular Session.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
On October 15,2007, the Council approved the Functional and Space
Program for the Thurston Fire Station # 16 Project and directed staff to
proceed with the design of a facility which would incorporate Best
Management Practices and which would address issues of gender
neutrality, ADA acc~ssibility, turnout and equipment storage "Blue
Line" separation and apparatus storage. The Council authorized the
project to inClude approximately 955U square feet
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Council Briefing Memo
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The project design team has been working with representatives of the
Fire Life Safety Department, Development Services, and IT to develop a
building layout which incorporates the Functional and Space Program as
approved by the City Council. Because of the site limitations, the project
team has developed a two-story option as well as a single story option.
The project team has identified the advantages and disadvantages of each
option, as well as the construction cost for each option.
In order to provide for public review and comment on each option, two
Open House sessions have been scheduled. On January 15, there will be
an Open House at City Hall and on January 17, there will be an Open
House at Thurston High School. Attendees will be asked to provide
comments on each option.
At the Council's Regular Session on January 22,2008, the project team
will present the options as well as all public comments and will request
that the Council direct staff to proceed with the design of their preferred
option. A summary of the budget and cost estimates for the design
options is shown below.
Construction Budget
$1,766,750
Single Story (Pitched Roof)
Two Story (Pitched Roof)
Two Story (Low Pitch Roof)
Two Story (Low Pitch Roof)
$1,697,000
$1,955,000
$2,051,000 with stucco exterior
$1,979,000 without stucco exterior
Date:
To:
January 8, 2008
Gino Grimaldi, City Manager
Carole Knapel
Thurston Fire Station #16 - Schematic Design Options
COUNCIL
BRIEFING
MEMORANDUM
From:
Subject:
ISSUE:
On October 15, the City Council authorized the project team to begin the design of the new Fire StatioI;l
#16. The approved project includes approximately 9550 square feet with a construction budget of
$1,767,000 and it will incorporate Best Management Practices for the design and operation offIre
stations. Because of the site limitations, the project team has developed a two-story schematic as well as a
single story option.
DISCUSSION:
The attached schematic drawings indicate the design options which have been developed by the project
team. Each of the options includes the space requirements and adjacencies which were approved in the
Functional and Space Program. The two-story option has been further developed to demonstrate a pitched
roof and a low-pitch roof.
Single-Story Option - Pitched Roof
This option includes 9545, square feet of space and provides all the required space for apparatus and
equipment, living areas and administrative areas. The cost of this design option is estimated to be
$1,697,000. The annual payments for the fmancing of this option are estimated to be $235,000.
The advantages ofthis option include the following;
· The cost estimate is within the approved construction cost budget.
· The single story design may be considered to be more consistent with the design of surrounding
residential properties
The disadvantages of this option include the following;
· The design uses more of the site. The existing station is approximately 5000 square feet. The new
design will nearly double the size of the facility to 9545 square feet. This design will therefore
limit the options for future, expansion of the station.
· Because the single story option uses more of the site, there is a limited area for outdoor staff
training. The project team has indicated however that the available site training area would still be
acceptable.
Two-Story Option - Pitched Roof
This option includes 9653 square feet of space and provides for the apparatus and equipment, living areas
and administrative space. The cost of this design option is $1, 955,000. The increased costs are the results
of the need to add an elevator, stairways, an increased number of windows and doors and an increased
amount of site work. The annual payments for.fmancing this option are estimated to be $268,000.
The advantages of this option include the following;
· This design reduces the footprint of the building to approximately 5585 square feet. The reduced
size of the building footprint allows for future expansion space for additional apparatus bays and
living areas if a future Council should determine to increase the size of the station at this location.
· The reduced footprint allows for more outdoor training space for the fIre crews.
The disadvantages ofthis option include the following;
· The cost of this option exceeds the construction budget by approximately $188,000.
· The pitched roof option will require a minor variance which would need to be addressed in the
Site Plan Review process.
Attachment A
Page 1 of 10
Two-Story -Low Pitch Roof
This option includes 9653 square feet of space in the same floor plan as the pitched roof design option.
The cost of this option is estimated to be $2,051,000. In addition to the cost increases discussed for the
pitched roof option (above), there are added costs resulting from the exterior wall treatment provided in
this option. Because of the low pitch of the roof, the project architect is recommending a stucco exterior
for this design. If an exterior wall treatment is used similar to the pitched roof option, the cost could be
reduced by $72,300 for a total estimated cost of$1,979,000. The annual payments for fmancing this
option are estimated to be $284,000.
The advantages of this option include the following;
. This design reduces the footprint of the building to approximately 5585 square feet. The reduced
size of the building footprint allows for future expansion space for additional apparatus bays and
living areas if a future Council should determine to increase the size of the station at this location.
. The reduced footprint allows for more outdoor training space for the ftre crews.
. Because ofthe lower profile, this option would not require a minor variance at the Site Plan
Review process.
The disadvantages of this option include the following;
. The cost of this option exceeds the construction budget by approximately $285,000.
ACTION REQUESTED:
No action is requested at this time. The project team will present these options to the community during
the Open House sessions scheduled for January 15 and January 17,2008. The project team will return to
the Council at their Regular Session on January 22 with information gathered from these Open House
sessIOns.
Attachment A
Page 2 of 10
STAFF ENTRY
co i
r-
ei ~
,~
2: ~
2:
0
~ j::
~ ~
~ II)
W
::i a:
~ u:
~ Q
.....
w
u: ~
Cl
2: ~
ir i
a.
II)
_QlLOOR PLAN - SINGLE STORY OPTION
9,545 sq. ft.
1/S" _ " -0"
DIlAWNBV:
CMHlI
CHECKfD BV:
PlB
DA.TE:
12-03007
Tm~
FLOOR PLAN
SCAU,
1/8.....,-.0..
LEGEND
. APPARATUS SPACE
UV\NG SPACE
SHEET NO:
. ADMINISTRATION SPACE
1
OF 10
<l:l 0
..--4
.j.J
~ ~
al 0
13
.c: C'I')
t.l
C\l al
.j.J 00
.j.J C\l
<l:l p..,
_CDFRONT ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
1/S". " -0.
ffiLEFT ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
......_. 2 _______~.._.__.__.._........._.......,._.................,........._......._._--"~'--"'----'-""-""'''--'''-''-'''-'''''''-''''-'''--'--''''''.-........-...--....---........
118' - l' -0'
EBRIGHT ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
..._...," 2 .....n.. ...._".....__..,....._....,............_..._<__.___.........__~_.__._._.__......_............................_.........__..__'........._....................._......_...................--..-...............-........................."-......-........-.-
118" - I' -0'
EBBACK ELEVATION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
__ 2 ____..___._._..__.__...._.__._.__..._._._~....,_._._..,._.._.__.....--....-......--......-.........-............--..-..........-...................,.
1/S"... " .0"
~
10 ~
...
ci ~
2 ~
2 ~
0
~ i=
<(
~ ~
a en
w
~ a:
" u::
~ C
...J
W
u::
C:l ~
2 E
C2 ~
ll.
en i
<0
.-l
~
l=l~
QJ 0
]""
u
CIl QJ
~ bI)
~ CIl
<Po<
DRAWJ\IBY:
CMHlI
CHECKED BY:'
PLB
DATE:
12-03-07
nn.e:
ELEVATIONS
SCALE:
1/8-.1-'0.
SHEET NO:
2
OF 10
E
SrMOARO WOOD FRAMUtQ wmt GYPSUM BOARD
INTERlOR RN!SH, BAn (HSUlAl1OH, PLYWOOD SHTa. FELT,
CEMENT BOARD SotHO WITH BRICK VEMEn WAlNSCOmHo.
.
Ul ~
... g
ci 9
Z i
z ~
0
~ i=
<t
0 I-
~ III
e W
~ 0:::
~ u::
~
. C
...I
W
u:: I
Cl
z
C2 ~
c..
III .
~
WI DOW STEM
APPARATUS
BAV
EMS STORAGE
IT
EBSECTION - SINGLE STORY OPTION
____ ,3 ~_~_.___m"..__.._._".__~___.,_______..._____..___________._.._.._____._______u_._._..,_._..__....~.__.___
118M = l' -0"
DIlAWfi BY:
c_
CHECKED 8Y:
PlB
DATE:
12-03-07
nnf:
SECTION
SCAlf:
118-.1.'0.
SHl:ET NO:
3
OF 10
<0
.......
-IJ
S::4-l
Q) 0
]Lrl
(.)
CIj Q)
-IJ bO
-IJ CIj
<p..,
CD i
... 0
0 ~
~
z ~
z
0
~ i=
<(
0 l-
e III
a w
~ a:
~ ii:
~
. 0
....I
W
ii:
'eJ ID
z E
a: ~
"-
III ;
EBFIRST FLOOR PLAN -TWO STORY OPTION
..m__ 4 ____.__.____.h_..___......__....__n.__..__..._________.__........._......_____.........._________._....._...
9,651 sq. ft.
5,585 Sq. Ft.
1,a" l':I: " -0"
LEGEND
DRAWN BV:
CMHlI
CHECKED BY:
PU
DATE:
12-03-07
TIne
fiRST
FLOOR PLAN
SCAU!:
lla~",.'Q.
IB APPARATUS SPACE
UVlNG SPACE
-. ADMlNJSTRATION SPACE
SHfEr NO:
4
0f'10
<l:lo
.--l
.j.J
~4-l
Q) 0
.E\D
U
Cll Q)
.j.J bJJ
.j.J Cll
<l:lP-<
ffiSECOND FLOOR PLAN -TWO STORY OPTION 4.068 Sq. Ft.
-.-" 6 _---'-_________.__...__.______._.__._.....___.___._.____._..._._....__...".._.,_..___.._....._.__......__._.~___._,____....____.______....____
9,651 sq. ft. , .
LEGEND
APPARATUS SPACE
LIVING SPACE
. ADMINISTRATION SPACE
1/8" ... l' -0"
CD
...
ci
z
z
0
~ i=
<I:
i I-
III
w
~ a:
" u:
~ C
...I
W
u:
(!:l ~
z &
ii: i
c..
III i
<0
......
.j.J
1=l4-1
CU 0
]"
tJ
tIl CU
.j.J 00
.j.J tIl
<p...
DRAWN BY:
CMHlI
CHECICEO eY:
PLB
DATE:
12-03-07
llTlf:
SECOND
FLOOR PLAN
SCAlE:
118-_1.'0.
SHfETNO:
5
ffiFRONT ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A
_..... 6 .._.__.__._____.__._........_............._...___......__..._n.__...._._.......___....._._.__....___..__h..._...__.................
1/S' a I' .0'
1:.:( .;:'.,..: I:Il.,.
~rrm~;b":~~-~-flID .
. .' .
,,,----.rrrn---.--.~~ill-
,,'r
',:"..:l'.I:,:l:':l:.l:,l:.
EBSIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A
___ 6 .___n....____._____..__--------'--_...____....._.__..._______.__.___._.........__.._______....____...........".__...._.._..
liS" a I' .0'
EBSIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A
__m_ 6 ..___.._.__.___._.__.......__...___.__...........__..___......___.__..__..u.........._...._.___.__________.___.__.......______.._...____
liS' _ 1'.0"
ffiBACK ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION A
....__6_____________....~____~_.__._____________._...__._._.-.-.-....----.....---..........--..---..---..-..--.-----..--.-----.-_.__..__.~------
. . liS' - I' .0'
U) ~
.... 3
0 ~
2: ~
2: ~
0
~ i=
<C
i I-
CIl
UJ
~ a:
~ u:
~
< 0
...l
UJ
u: ~
C)
2: ~
0: ~
0..
CIl ii
<0
..-l
+J
~lH
Q) 0
a
,.coo
tJ
ell Q)
+J on
+J ell
<p...
DRAWN 8Y;
CMHlI
ot!!'CKED BY:
PlB
OAT!!':
12-03-01
TmE,
ELEVATIONS
SCAlf:
1/8-.'.'0.
SHffTNO:
6
OF 1.0
-'-'"
EBFRONT ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B
..___ 7 ___________~___..____......._._____..__..._______..._...._.__.___._.______..___.._____.__....._.___~.._
liS" - l' -0"
---,,--,,-'---,'
"',
..."
- - - - - - -- - -"~._~,- - -- -- - -- - - - - - --
EBSIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B
--.- 7 ..._._...__.____...___.____...__._.__..._...____....____.__._.____,_____....._.._..______.....:..._.___......_.._..______._,_
liS" = l' .0"
EBSIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B
___ 7 "........._.._.._.__._._....___.._.._____.........."._.__...___._....._.....______.__.__..___._...._________.__....._....___~
liS" = 1'.0"
EB BACK ELEVATION - TWO STORY OPTION B
__... 7 .__....__-:._.____._.._.._..__._..__._______...._____...____.__._.........,__.._____...._......_._._....._._......_.__....__.___.___...__......
liS". l' -0"
CD
....
ci
z
z
0
~ i=
<C
~ I-
a II)
w
" a:
~ i!
< 0
...J
W
i! ~
Cl,
Z' ~
ii: ~
Q.
VI iii
<0
.-I
.j.J
Q4-l
Q) 0
a
,..c::0\
c.J
ell Q)
.j.J bll
.j.J ell
<p..
ORAWN BY:
CMHlI
CHECKED BY:
PL.
DATE:
12-03-07
mLE:
ELEVATIONS
SCAlf:
1/8"_1.'0.
SHEET NO:
7
OF 10
00 S MS
TJI TAUSSfS 0 248 OC WITH PLYWOOD,
.. PLY MODlREa BWLT UP ROOANQ
E
APPARATUS
BAY
L OR M
r.l WOOD TRUSSES 'MTH 3Y a~RETe.
TOPPING SLAB OYER PLYWOOD SUPPORTED NTH alUE
LAM DEAMS. (.....LL REQUIRE CIIU WAlLS TO 2tlD FLOOR)
INTERIOR PARTITION SYSTEM
STAGGERED STUD WOOD FHANlNG WITH SOUND BATT
INSULAllOH, GVPSUM BOARD AT EACH SIDE FOA SOUND
CONTROL. CMU AT ALL WALLS IN APPARATUS BAYS.
STAHDAAD WOOD fRUIINO WITH GYPSUM BOARD
InTERIOR AtaSH. BATT I"SULATION, PLYWOOD SHTO, FELT,
STUCCO ANlSH \MTH BRlCKlSTOHE VENEER WAlHSCOmHI1
eMU WALLS AT APPARATUS (EXPOSED OR COVEREDI
KITCHEN
PHVSlCAL
TRAlNlHO
W~C3
!
I
CD I
....
ci ~
z ~
z ~
0 '.
~ i=
c:l:
~ ~
III
W
~ II:
~ u::
~
. C
....I
W
u:: ~
Cl
z e
a: ~
II..
III i
EXTERIOR WINDOW SYSTEM
STAfiDARD VlHYL WINDOWS WITH INSULATED, LOW f,
lIRTED GLAZING, 6. TRANSOM UGHTS FOR flA1URAl
uaHTlNO AltO EflEROV BA\/INOS.
ffiSECTION - TWO STORY OPTION A
.......... 8 ............._.uun................_._......_........._..._._.._....._.,_..._"H..".....__..........__...."..._...._....__.__...."..._.___....................,.........._,......_ "....
ROOF S ST S
1/S" - 1'-0.
PREfABfDCATED WOOD TRUSSES@
24H OC WITH PLYWOOD, FEU, 40 YEAR ASPHALT
SHINGLES.
E E 0
EM
DRAWN 8Y:
CMHII
CHECKED BY;
PlB
DA.TE:
12"03--01
nnE:
SECTION
SCAlE:
118M_1_'OM
TJI WOOD TRUSSES WITH 3M GYP-CRETE
TOPptHG SLAB OvER PLYWOOD SUPPORTED WITH GLUE
LAM BEAMS. (WILL REQUIRE CNU WALLS TO 2ND fLOOR)
INTERIOR PARTITION SYSTEM
STAGGERED STUD WOOD FRAMING WITH SOUND BAn
INSULATION, GYPSUM BOARD AT EACH SIDE FOR SOUND
CONTROL. eMU AT ALL WALLS IN APPARATUS BAYS.
STANDARD WOOD FRAMING WITH GYPSUM BOARD
INTERIOR FINISH, BAn ItlSULATION. PLYWOOD SHTG, FELT,
CENEttT LAP S1D1t1G WITH BRICK VENEER W....HSCDTnNo.
CMU WALLS AT APPARATUS (EXJlQSED OR COVEREDI
KITCHEN
EXTERIOR WINDOW SYSTEM
STAftDARD ~t1YL WINDOWS WITH INSUlATED, LOW E,
TINTED GLAZING, 6. TRAHSON UGHTS FOR NATURAL
UGHTING AND ENERGY BAVl.NGS.
APPARATUS
BAY
_CDSECTION - TWO STORY OPTION B
SHiEr NO:
8
11S" - " -0"
0
<11 .......
+J 4-l
s:: 0
OJ
] 0
.......
CJ
I'd ,,0)
+J 00
+J I'd
<11 p...