HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/20/1999 Regular
."
.
.
.
APPROVED
MINUTES &
NOTICE OF BOARD ACTIO
LANE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
This document, upon approval in a public meeting by the Board of County Commissioners,
serves as official minutes of such meetings as required under the Open Meetings Law, ORS 192.650.
Pursuant to notice made by mailing agendas to news media, a selected list of jurisdictions and
individuals in Lane County, a meeting of the Board of Commissioners was held.
Questions should be directed to the Board Office Specialist 3, ext. 4203.
October 20, 1999
6:30 p.m.
JOINT ELECTED OFFICIALS'
MEETING
Fairgrounds
Performance Hall
THIRD READING AND CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING/Ordinance P A 1132/In the Matter of
Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan to Adopt a Revised
"Transportation Element" and Related Changes to the Plan Text; Adopting Revisions to the Eugene-
Springfield Transportation System Plan (TransPlan); and Adopting a Severability Clause.
CALL TO ORDER AND REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEARING FORMAT
Commissioner Bobby Green, Sr., presided. He called the meeting to order for the Board of County
Commissioners. Present from the Board of Commissioners: Bill Dwyer, Cindy Weeldreyer, Peter
Sorenson and Recording Secretary, Melissa Zimmer. Anna Morrison was excused.
Mayor Jim Torrey called the meeting to order for the City of Eugene. Present from the Eugene City
Council: Pat Farr, Bobby Lee, Scott Meisner, Gary Pape, Gary Rayor and Betty Taylor. David Kelly
and Nancy Nathanson were excused.
Mayor Maureen Maine called the meeting to order for the City of Springfield. Present from the
Springfield City Council: Anne Ballew, Tammy Fitch, Lyle Hatfield, Christine Lundburg and Fred
Simmons. Sid Leiken was excused.
Hilary Wylie opened the meeting for the Lane Transit District. Present from the L TD Board: Rob
Bennett, Pat Hocken, Dave Kleger, Dean Kortge and Virginia Lauritsen.
Green apologized to Hilary Wylie, Lane Transit District. He stated when they closed out the
meeting last time, he advertently called the elected officials to close their hearing and L TD officials
Page 1 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/9913 6/T
.
.
.
are appointed officials. He said he never gave her the opportunity to officially do that.
Green noted that the written record will remain open until October 29. He added that all testimony
of the record will be available.
Green read Lane County's Ordinance PA 1132 into the record.
Mayor Torrey noted it was a continuation of the previous hearing for the Eugene City Council.
Mayor Maine noted they continued the hearing for the Springfield City Council.
Hilary Wylie, Lane Transit District, stated they were continuing their hearing.
Bo Adan, 3785 Pine Canyon, Eugene, noted that Eugene and Springfield cut services and activities
for community youth. He said the TransPlan needs rethinking, revisioning and rewriting.
Eben Fodor, 394 E. 32nd Ave., Eugene, stated he is a professional planner and in Oregon, a planning
process is a goal driven process and the state has 19 goals. He noted the stakeholders of the
community were not represented, they were mostly of development and transportation interests. He
added people on the committee did not feel their input was reflected.in this plan. He said the plan
itself is not a good one. He said the plan doesn't live up to the goal and the choice is to either make
a plan that lives up to the goal or change the goal. He asked the officials to endorse the process to
make a better plan.
Anastasia Sandowl, 123 Fir Lane, Eugene, provided visual testimony on the proposed Valley River
Bridge area to the officials.
Lora Byxbe, 677 W. 23rd. Ave, Eugene, stated she wanted the Board to consider the Friends of
Eugene's proposed community process when adopting TransPlan.
David Moon, 1870 Fairmount, Eugene, commented that the TransPlan needs to be a plan and
encouraged the decision makers to be creative and innovative so the TransPlan is really a plan for
the future and not a list of road improvements for the growth of car traffic. He noted for the
TransPlan to be successful, existing neighborhoods need to be maintained. He asked that increased
emphasis be placed on bicycle transportation, walking and other alternatives. He said he supported
off-road bicycle path development. He said that the TransPlan should avoid funding and building
car oriented projects to save time. He stated he was concerned with the Interchange 150 proposal.
(Chapter 3, page 29 ofthe revised TransPlan.) He asked the leaders not to move this interchange
proposal to the funded projects category as it would harm one of the older neighborhoods in Eugene.
He added the existing interchanges are more than sufficient.
Randall Hledik, P. O. Box 7428, Eugene, stated as a member of the Transportation Demand
Page 2 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
.
.
Management Task Force that was created in 1993, he encouraged the officials to adopt TDM policies
that promote voluntary incentive oriented practices that help reduce single occupant vehicular traffic
in the Eugene/Springfield metro area. He noted that voluntarily programs like group transit passes,
ride share matching and transit use subsidies, coupled with other efforts including public education
and marketing programs, offer the best approach to implementing effective transportation
management and reduction strategies. He added the basic principle of voluntary incentive oriented
TDM remains in place. He said the revised draft plan recognizes the implementation of economic
measures such as congestion pricing in the Eugene/Springfield area would be premature, because
the. level of public acceptance is low and the costs of implementation are substantial. He said the
TDM task force was composed of people who had differing viewpoints. He asked the elected
,officials to remain steadfast to the task force principle of voluntary incentive oriented programs.
Edward Winter, 85354 Doene Rd, Eugene, stated he supports the Friends of Eugene's proposal. He
noted the TransPlan encourages building more roads in the outlying areas, preventing the plan from
meeting the state goal. He said global warming will have a devastating effect on Eugene's
environment and economy. He said walking and riding bicycles are a better and cheaper way to
reduce congestion. He added more people would bicycle if there were more convenient bicycle
paths. He stated he was opposed to the Valley River Bridge as it will destroy neighborhoods, parks
and open space, for a little gain. He said he was also opposed to the transportation utility fee.
Steven Mueller, 65 Lund Drive, Eugene, read his letter into the record. Please see Exhibit "A".
Barnev McCabe, 2816 lone, Eugene, noted he was the former chair of the Land Use Measure Task
Force, and that citizens from all areas took part in the process. He said except for one person, the
balance of the task force agreed with the goals and policies as set forth (23 out of24.) He noted the
TransPlan is a compromise and a long process. He added it is not a stack of paper, it is an ongoing
way of life. He stated neighborhood livability is a key to a successful TransPlan and to people
choosing to live in their neighborhoods and not moving farther out. He asked the officials for their
support to move forward with the plan.
Kay Bvler, 1972 Pierce St., Eugene, suggested to have trolley cars that would benefit the whole city.
She suggested giving more power to the neighborhoods so they could find sustainable choices for
their lives. She said trolley cars and gardens are the best ideas.
Doug Sabin, 570 River Road, Eugene, stated he is opposed to the TransPlan document because it
is politically based and does not address the overall needs of the community. He added in the last
thirty years, every road project impacting residential neighborhoods in the City of Eugene has been
voted down. He said the proposed Valley River Bridge would be a step in shifting the burden of
transportation in the metropolitan area to the River Road neighborhood. He said if the bridge is
built, the intersections of Beltline and Chambers connector will gridlock because of the short
distance between signals at the intersections. He added there had been no road lanes added south
of 11 th Street in Eugene in the last 30 years. He said it is time to integrate zoning infrastructure and
Page 3 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99 1 36/T
.
land use patterns with transportation needs.
John Saemann, 1775 Atkins, Eugene, stated improving transportation choices is something that'
everyone wants, but there is disagreement on how to get there. He commented that more cars and
gridlock hurts economic life. He said suburb ani zing farm land has not prevented increasing traffic
tie-ups, accidents and frustration, and will not do so in the future. He suggested to make things less
convenient and provide the best alternatives, including frequent electric buses or modern trolley cars.
He added he endorses the Friends of Eugene program.
Steve Miller, 1034 Lawrence, Eugene, noted that soon everyone will have cheap fiber optic cable
service available and high speed Internet access. He said the use of the Internet, for work, shopping
and entertainment will skyrocket. He said there will be increasing gridlock on the highways without
expensive road building. He added there will be faster and cheaper electronic access for goods and
services and it doesn't make sense to continue to expand the economy of the automobile in the
information age. He added TransPlan is trying to solve the wrong problem, the real problem is the
faith that by building more roads there will be more mobility and a better future. He urged the
officials to put together a sensible TransPlan that makes life better for people, not cars and trucks.
.
Becky Rilev, 202 Hawthorne, Eugene, stated she was testifying on behalf of the nine members of
the Friends of Rasor Park Steering Committee. She said they have concerns about the TransPlan,
but are asking to take the Valley River Bridge off the project list and to send the whole document
back to planners, with the request that they work closer with community groups, including Friends
of Eugene to redraft and strengthen it. She noted that Rasor Park is the only remaining piece of
publicly owned open space of its size in the River Road area and is critical to the livability of the
neighborhood.
Charles Biggs, 2405 Willakenzie Rd., #1, Eugene, said there is an erosion of the livability from the
major wide collector streets into the area he lives in, and all the traffic volume and noise associated
with it. He said the nodal concept as of yet has little appeal and won't alleviate the TransPlan
obstacles. He said nodal living should be encouraged and rewarded by financial funding, priority
for capital improvement projects and totally subsidized L TD passes. He said there should be bicycle,
pedestrian and road improvements.
Misha Dunlop, 358 W. 4th, Eugene, said she is a member of the Eugene business community and
has a downtown business that employs 20 people. She said she is in favor of revising TransPlan to
place more money and emphasis on alternative transportation. She noted her business has been
delivering its wholesale products by bicycle on a daily basis since 1997. She added that driving is
an addiction and TransPlan and its proponents are like pushers. She asked the officials not to
subsidize the addiction and to revise the TransPlan.
Todd Blevins, 2476 Portland, Eugene, stated he supported the Friends of Eugene plan to revise the
TransPlan. He suggested to look to Europe for how to run trains. He added Eugene can do better
.
Page 4 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99 1 36/T
.
.
.
than TransPlan.
Alexa Doty, 868 Baxter St., Eugene, stated she would rather have a bike path than a road to the mall
and urged the elected officials to add more bike paths.
Janet Bott, 662 N. 12th, Springfield, stated there is a problem with the Oregon planning process.
She said the document that was produced by planners has created a public outcry and opposition.
She said public input methods need to be reassessed. She stated that TransPlan does not address
the cost of property condemnations required to construct the BR T or its crossing at the Franklin
Boulevard Bridge. She suggested a BRT might be a better fit along 105, 126, Beltline or the existing
rail corridor with its own bridge. She added the proposed BR T is in conflict with the Oregon
statewide planning goals 5, 6, 9 and 10. She urged the officials to abandoned the BRT concept and
further revise the TransPlan.
Ray Heslep, 719 Sunnyside Dr., Eugene, noted the reason for the Valley River Bridge is due to
pressure from businesses, but it doesn't mean that the City of Eugene needs it. He said the
Goodpasture Island Bridge overpass needs work and money should be put towards that.
Anthony Towne, 127 McClure Lane, Eugene, stated he has not heard one person from River Road
in favor of the bridge. He said the neighbors want to keep the park. He added he wants to see more
money spent on alternative transportation. He said with regard to the bridge and bike path, the
homeless hang out and people get scared. He asked not to create another unsafe place.
Kevin Matthews, 31728 Alroad, Eugene, stated he was on the Board of Friends of Eugene. He
discussed the three documents that Friends of Eugene presented and endorsed. He said that
TransPlan is not a good enough plan and for the officials to work with the Friends of Eugene.
Jan Spencer, 1266 W. 41\ read his letter into the record. Please see Exhibit "B".
Commissioner Green recessed the meeting for 15 minutes, to return at 8:00 p.m.
Moishe Immelman, 1292 McClean, Eugene, stated there needs to be a plan for global warming and
TransPlan is not it. He added it is not a plan that the city can live with. He suggested to reduce bus
fares and pay for them with a tax levied by county government. He added to focus on nodal
development and protecting the quality of communities and implementing the Friends of Eugene's
plan in a visionary way.
Meisha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln, Apt. 306, Eugene, stated things need to be better so there are no
more problems.
Kathy Ging, 2878 Harris, suggested that the people who helped create the Eugene Celebration could
help design creative transit. She suggested prizes be donated for a lottery for people who ride the
Page 5 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
.
.
transit. She said the bus rides could also be subsidized by other fees. She said that fast growth is
the culprit with the plan. She asked the officials to institute auto omissions measures.
Richard Coolman, 3345 Storey, Eugene, stated he is a pediatrician and father of three. He noted only
10 per cent of children walk or ride their bikes to school, down from 50% in the 50's and 60's. He
said increasing traffic jeopardizes the safety of those who walk or bike and little has been done to
improve the safety and utility of the bikeway system of Eugene. He noted the issue of a balanced
TransPlan is not whether the automobile will remain the prevailing mode of transportation, but what
is the most cost effective investment to relieve future traffic pressures. He said TransPlan needs to
adequately fund walking and biking sufficient for safety and convenience by putting road projects
on hold. He asked the officials to read the Eugene Bicycle Coalition's written testimony, that the
highest priority be given to fixing any gaps, missing links or dangerous crossings pertinent to a third
grader accessing neighborhood schools and parks. He added that prospects for children need to be
improved.
Peter Cacioppi, 630 'li W. 101\ Eugene, stated that more money from TransPlan needs to be spent
for bicycling and pedestrian use.
Jim Hale, 1715 Linnea, Eugene, stated he opposes the dedicated right of way of bus rapid transit and
the land use refinement, riders contained in the fine print of the TransPlan document. He noted the
proposed transportation utility fee is a regressive tax and most would go for roads. He said that fees
should be replaced with a straight forward local tax on gasoline and diesel fuel that should be
adopted countywide. He added the revenue stream envisioned for TransPlan is inadequate as it will
not raise enough money for the County's needs (it builds too few roads, not too many.) He said the
Valley River Bridge is questionable to him, but there other places where the need is clear, the
intersection of Beltline and Delta Highway and River Road and Belt Line. He asked the officials
to study the TransPlan and do a better job with it.
David Wade, 1673 Villiard, Eugene, stated he was not in favor of the TransPlan. He added the
public is not in favor of anything that will undermine their use of their motor vehicle. He said the
two bridges over the Willamette River should be taken out of the TransPlan. He suggested
incentives for nodal developments.
Robin Irish, 2559 Emerald, Eugene, said she is new to Eugene and gets everywhere by bicycle. She
said a flaw she found with the TransPlan is the L TD bus system. She said the people on the
transportation committee need to take the leadership role in promoting bus ridership. She added the
buses need to be more accessible and better utilized.
Paul Moore, 2586 Potter, Eugene, noted Eugene needs to be an oasis in the transportation wasteland.
He requested to develop a means of accommodating more bicycles on L TD buses, prepare local
maps for each neighborhood school, indicating appropriate bicycle routes for third graders traveling
to and from the various parts of the neighborhood that the school serves. He also suggested to fund
Page 6 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
.
.
transportation coordinators to work with the school districts to help each school develop a plan for
reducing its auto reliance in increasing the use of alternative transportation. He added in
coordination with the school districts, the development and introduction of high quality multi-
dimensional transportation curriculum should be funded in all of the schools, including on-street
bicycle safety and practical experience in taking the bus.
Bruce Miller, 88 W. 29th, Eugene, read his letter into the record. Please see Exhibit "C".
John Flaurev, 878 Almaden, Eugene, stated he wanted to see the VMT reduced. He said that people
need to feel comfortable in not owning a car or driving less. He suggested to make taxis more
efficient and widespread to make people drive less. He added that there should be additional buses
running and especially at night.
Jack Radabaugh, 1361 Luella, Eugene, noted the TransPlan is not a transportation plan, it is a road
plan. He added there is little money for buses, pedestrians or transit. He said he thinks the
TransPlan violates Eugene's commitment to slow growth. He suggested mandatory control through
parking taxes, subsidies for buses, staggered quitting times, odometer taxes and toll roads. He said
nodal development is a good way for holding the line on the urban growth boundary and that there
should be ordinances passed regarding them. He said the new Valley River Bridge proposed will
be a nightmare as it will jam up Valley River, Cal Young and Coburg, as there are no east/west
streets to handle traffic from the bridge. He added to have the amounts of the projects be included
in the TransPlan.
Mara Wile, 1347 Dalton, Eugene, stated it is impossible to build out of congestion. She said she
lives in the River Road area and no one in the River Road area that she has spoken with has been
involved in the Valley River Bridge plan. She said the proposed area is one of the most beautiful
pieces of the bike path. She suggested to reduce VMT, streets should be improved instead of putting
the money into the Valley River Bridge. She endorses the Friends of Eugene proposal and asked
the officials to vote the TransPlan in its current form, out of Eugene's future.
Alexia Kelly, 1185 Sunnyside Dr., Eugene, said she thinks the TransPlan needs to be revised as it
doesn't meet the needs of the present or future community. She said projects should be funded that
will improve the community. She asked the officials not to give in to pressure by money and have
development in areas that are left untouched. She said there is an opportunity for Eugene to set a
precedent for other areas and the rest of the country to follow, by putting people before dollars and
livability before progress. She suggested to expand alternative transportation, developing in a local
sustainable way, nodal development on a neighborhood scale and not approving TransPlan as it
stands.
Rudy Herr, 2255 Donald, Eugene, stated he supports the present TransPlan as it is a realistic
compromise between the majority in the community who rely on automotive transportation and the
few that rely on other forms of transportation. He noted there needs to be more diversity with the
speakers. He said he was against putting money for nodal development until it can be shown that
Page 7 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
.
.
there is a successful nodal development in the country. He supports the making of alternate
transportation as attractive as possible.
Commissioner Green recessed the meeting for a 15 minutes, to return at 9:30 p.m.
Commissioner Green reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Mayor Torrey reported that Councilors Meisner and Pape have been excused and they are no longer
officially in session. He stated they will reconvene as a subcommittee of the council.
Mayor Maine reported that Councilors Fitch, Hatfield and Lundberg were excused and they are no
longer officially in session. She said they will reconvene as a subcommittee of the council.
Mayor Torrey stated he has adjourned the meeting of the Eugene City Council at 9:30 p.m. and
convened a subcommittee to hear the balance of the testimony.
Mayor Maine did the same for the Springfield City Council.
Hillary Wylie did the same for the Lane Transit District.
Jan VanderTwin, 455 W. 1st Street, Eugene, stated he doesn't want another bridge. He said he
works with children on transportation education and the need is to get into the schools with the true
cost of transportation. He asked the officials to put more money towards transportation education
with youth.
Fred Simmons, 312 S. 52nd, Springfield, said that as a citizen, he stands opposed to TransPlan the
way it is written. He said there needs to be more to facilitate bike use. He added there should be a
universal pass for increasing ridership. He said he hopes that the officials will take a collective look
at this as citizens, and listen to the people and change the document. He said emphasis should be
changed from reliance on the automobile to other modes to maintain a quality oflife. He said there
should be change for the better for the direction of TransPlan.
Mark Murphv, 2015 W. 25th, Eugene, stated he is a project designer that is working with electric
vehicles. He said he has concerns about the TransPlan as it is based on a flawed assumption that the
next 20 years will reflect the previous decade's growing dependence on automobile use. He said
there is going to be a growing global oil shortfall within the first decade ofthe next century. He said
the TransPlan needs to be refocused to anticipate the events that could result in a managed transition
to alternatives of urban mobility and reduce the eGonomic and social repercussions that every
community will face as the oil crises develop. He said the TransPlan doesn't address any such
scenario and may result in an overbuilding of traffic infrastructure that will be obsolete at great
expense.
Page 8 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
.
.
Steve Adamson, 1436 E. 22nd Avenue, Eugene, said he is here as a representative of the business
community and is a partner in a downtown law firm that focuses on business law. He said that
improving TransPlan is not only an issue of the vocal minority but of mainstream Lane County
residents as the quality of life is at stake. He encouraged officials to look at Western Europe as an
example for TransPlan. He added communities with good mass transport are often healthier
communities. He urged the adoption of the proposals by the Friends of Eugene, having no bridge
at Valley River Center, increasing mass transit, and to think how mass transit could solve the
problems of TransPlan.
. Tom Lester, 1826 Lincoln, Eugene, stated he was speaking on behalf of the Mill Street Bridge
Committee. He said the Mill Street Bridge Committee urges the officials not to provide $30 million
to the Lane Transit District for bus rapid transit, instead they urge that all references to bus rapid
transit be removed from the TransPlan and establishing a ten year moratorium on funding and
implementing this project. He said there is no need to rush the implementation of bus rapid transit
as building bus rapid transit lines before traffic congestion would result in an extremely expensive,
under utilized system. He said to construct BR T at this time, within the context of a street system
absent of traffic congestion, results in alignment choices for BRT that would ruin the quality of
urban environment. He added it will not increase ridership nor decrease the levels of traffic
congestion.
, David Zupan, 87 W. 23rd, Eugene, said he works with the Eugene Peaceworks and disagrees with
the draft of the TransPlan. He said the problem is air pollution that is in the community already and
the TransPlan doesn't reflect that. He said it should be a city for everyone and suggests revising the
TransPlan.
Judy Granatstein, 390 N. Polk, Eugene, stated she does not support the draft TransPlan as it is
currently written. She said it is written for the past, reflecting a culture that dwindling resources can
no longer support. She said that TransPlan fails to find a realistic balance between transportation
modes and sets the future up for sprawl and suburban growth. She said existing infrastructure needs
to be worked with to ease congestion instead of adding another bridge to compete with operations
and maintenance funds. She added that TransPlan should be a vision based on community values.
Anand Keathley, 389 N. Polk St., Eugene, said that TransPlan as it is currently envisioned, is
expanding car access. He said if it goes forward as it is, it will end up in the courts.
Wendy Lowe, 65 W. 29th Ave, Eugene, stated she bought her house so she could be within walking
and bicycling distance of the things that were important to her. She said time is important, but what
lies in the path of the proposed Valley River Bridge took the park 86 years to reach and if the new
bridge is built, all the labor will have been sacrificed to shave less than two minutes off of a bus ride.
She urged the officials not to vote for the bridge.
Howard Grooters, 650 W. 12th Eugene, said that commuting by bicycle in Eugene is ajoy and he
Page 9 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
.
.
hopes it remains that way. He added autos do cause risk to public safety, noise, and carbon
monoxide polutions. He suggested to make the auto less convenient, not more. He said TransPlan
is not just about building roads, it is about building a road to hell. He asked the officials to follow
the Friends of Eugene.
Chris Clemow, 25340 Vaughn Rd., Veneta, noted it was not a special interest Eugene plan. He said
TransPlan is a metropolitan area transportation plan that includes Springfield and Lane County. He
added there were not a lot of people from Springfield and Lane County who attended. He said the
TransPlan document is not perfect, it is a planning document that will be revised. He added it should
be revised as soon as this one is adopted.
Xochitz Hernandez Howe, 2544 Kincaid, suggested the TransPlan should facilitate the community's
future independence from inefficient polluting. She said it would encourage Eugene to become a
leader. She proposed that an updated TransPlan set forth a yearly goal of completion of a number
of miles with non-automobiles constructed for safety, and bike paths. She asked for the plan to
reserve a particular budget of no less than $60 million for the development of bike paths that would
be allocated to businesses in the form of grants or utilized by the city to complete specific bike paths.
Randy Prince, P. O. Box 927, Eugene, said there should be bicycles to prevent auto traffic. He said
he likes the rapid transit part of the TransPlan because there are restricted lanes of traffic that are
efficient. He added there should be a toll role where people could pay as they went and taxis should
be considered.
Ted Butler, 695 River Loop, #1, Santa Clara, said he is 15 years old and he does not have the ability
or option to drive a car. He said there is a large contingency of young people that need to get around.
He read a poem that he had composed.
MOTION: to approve the Third Reading and Continued Public Hearing and setting a Fourth Reading
and Discussion for Ordinance PA 1132 on December 1, 1999.
Sorenson MOVED, Dwyer SECONDED.
VOTE: 4-0.
Mayor Maine noted that the Springfield City Council will take this up at their first work session on
TransPlan on December 6.
Wylie stated she is closing their public hearing and adjourning their meeting.
Green thanked everyone for taking the time to speak.
There being no further business, Commissioner Green adjourned the meeting at 10: 15 p.m.
Page 10 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99 I 36/T
. '
I
'\
.
.
'\ ')
y\\)' ~~/l j
Melissa Zimmer
Recording Secretary
)
<~l,j) IY~
'-.
Adopted by .the Springfield City Council on November 15, 1999 by a vote of 5 for
and ~ against.
~~1A~
Maureen M. Maine
Mayor
ATTEST:
~
~
Page 11 -- Continued Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- October 20, 1999
WP bc/m/99136/T
.
TransPlan Testimony by Steven Mueller
65 Lund Drive, Eugene, OR 97404
10120/99
The projects in TransPlan come with a host of costs to the community. I'm not talking
about the million-dollar pricetags listed in the document, I'm talking about the perma- '
nent loss of our quality of life resources, which everyone values, but which are increas-
ingly in short supply--natural open space, pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods, safety,
peace and quiet. These losses are much more significant than the dollars spent, and I
think we all know that, yet I see no effort to evaluate livability costs in this process.
Of course, ease of transportation contributes to our quality of life too. So when you
evaluate the projects in TransPlan, you should ask: Is the overall effect to increase or
decrease livability? Is the benefit worth the cost?
In projects which add to existing roads, the costs may be minor and the benefits obvi-
ous. But in projects that create new roadways through natural or developed areas, the
sacrifices are much greater and the benefits much more dubious. Some projects, when
scrutinized, can turn out to be just plain counterproductive.
.
I believe this is the case with the Valley River Bridge. If built, it would cost my neigh-
borhood dearly, its benefits would be negligible, and it would violate many of
TransPlan's own goals.
Would a new bridge reduce reliance on cars and encourage alternate modes? If any-
thing, it would make cars more attractive for short trips. Also, the area around the
bridge and its interchanges would be a decidedly unfriendly environment for pedestri-
ans, so more people would be getting into their cars.
Would a new bridge integrate with local land use? Like an 800 lb. gorilla. Where it
penetrates the Greenway it would ~isplace wildlife and "diminish peoples' enjoyment of
the natural space. Where it penetrates residential areas it would diminish the value of
every home within earshot. If it were located anywhere near Rasor Park, the park's
value would be diminished as well.
Are there overriding benefits that would make a new bridge worth building? Overall
miles travelled would decrease by only 0.2 of 1 percent, not a significant amount in the
context of TransPlan projections.
.
Drivers would have one more option for crossing the river, but how practical an option?
For River Road residents, most driving destinations would be along Beltline Road, so
EXHIBIT "Nt
.
.
.
"
..
why not take the Beltline Bridge? If we want to get to Valley River, we already have a
successful alternate route in the bike bridge. If Goodpasture Island Road residents are
heading downtown or out West 11 th, the existing bridges are more direct. If they did cross
a new bridge and landed on River Road, they'd either head for Beltline (in which case
they could've taken the BeItline Bridge), or they'd have to backtrack to Chambers Over-
pass, or navigate through residential areas, to pick up any of the northwest conduits--not a
very efficient route.
Is the new bridge an integral part of the Bus Rapid Transit system? Its only benefit seems
to be to enable one BRT line to cover two areas, River Road and Valley River. Why not
just have two routes? Bus riders would certainly prefer this.
To summarize, the Valley River Bridge has steep livability costs and few compelling
reasons for being. I know there is a lot of bureaucratic momentum behind this project, but
as final decision-makers it's your responsibility to act in the public interest and, I think, to
justify these actions to the public. If you cannot identify the benefits which would justify
the costs of this bridge, and if you cannot convey those benefits in a way that 1, and the
people in this room, and the community at large, can understand and support, you have no
right to approve this bridge.
Thank you.
~V\~
"
Testiomony by Jan Spencer, 1266 W5th Eugene
.
Judging by the Transplan Draft and its budget, \ve are looking at how to facilitate automobile usage rather
than what makes sense for transportation for people and goods. Are we trying to move people or or are we
trying to move cars?
Sixty years ago, many city transportation systems \vere bought out by front companies controlled by
General Motors, Standard Oil of-California and Firestone Rubber Company. Trams and trolleys \vere
allowed to deteriorate and then replaced by products these companies had to sell such as buses, tires and
fuel and later automobiles. We are left with the legacy of automobile dependence. Paradoxically, this
market driven economy seeks production methods as efficient as possible to maximize profits while at the
same time offering products that are the inverse of efficient or smart, Automobiles are tragically inefficient
and when one considers the amount of energy they consume and the amount of useful work they perform.
The infrastructure they require is oppresive and an insult to our sensitivities. Alternatives do exist.
Far too much of our urban space is devoted to transportation infrastructure, roads and parking. It is an ugly
landscape. Autos kill some 50,000 people in the US each year while injuring hundreds of thousands more
directly and millions indirectly through air and noise pollution, stress and an urban environment that To my
mind interferes tremendously with quality of life in many ways.
As written, Trans Plan is the local manifestation of big business at the public trough as it manipulates
information and public process for its own e~richment. The big losers are the environment, the community
and the future. Alternatives do exist.
.
As written, Trans Plan is not only anti environment and would insult our sensitivities even more than at
,present; it is anti democratic. The Shaping Eugene process several years ago clearly showed the majority
of people in Eugene want clean air, alternatives to sprawl and alternatives to congestion. They want better
transportation options and to preserve our quality of life. Big bu~iness is anti democratic and we see it in
Trans Plan.
As written, Trans Plan would continue and encourage the the big pusiness agenda of continued unwanted
influence over our transportation system and by extension over much of how we live our lives. Trans Plan
and big business ignore or seriously undervalue natural beauty, community, a clean environfnent, all sorts
of aesthetics, democracy and transportation efficiency. The private sector is enriched while the public
sector is made to suffer. We are not seeing a free market at work, we are seeing a continued effort of
economic control by big business that is contrary to the well being of Eugene and all of its residents,
human and otherwise.
What is ironic is that building and developing does not have to be contrary to the public good. Innovations
in manufacturing, technology, planning and design offer new opportunities to be profitable in ways that
contribute to the quality of life and'a healthy economy. Transportation is a critical part of our lives and
Trans Plan is a critical opportunity to make best use of new ideas and new attitudes. Alternatives do exist.
Re \vrite Trans Plan to reflect democracy, to preserve our quality of life and a clean environment. Eugene
. can be in the vanguard of smart choices for the future. We can be a community others can look to and
benefit from our example. Make autos pay the full price for the negative impact they have on our town.
Increase dramatically bike and walking infrastructure. Make riding the bus a serious challenge to the auto.
- ,
Be a part of creating a transportation system and community that is for the people and by the people and
creates a far healthier leagacy for the future.
1:;' vu TnT 'T' " n ' ,
. '. .
oc 1 ~6j 1'199
()ruce L/J-lIj(er
. ~o/(}3bi.561b8 ;
" fu~ aU( q7'10~ ,-
J~m ~ iferJtI1 JJJ ~'h ~ J~. '. / JJJ- /t~ ~'c
Q~ 1 od?Jif^ J~ 2~ fo,~:/o, dM/JmdJfJ
1" 'ah ~ tL ~ " - -
- _ 1 , "n - '--
r JL ,~, '" ,,' ", ,,', '",'
Ijo ;;. dJ. . " " '-' S1.0J~
' ': J ~;i r~kt/d;J /e~. . 4 l4i& ~
'Atfv~ IL "'t~ilJ':dfdJtJ;jpir/lcim - , "~~,
tt/ll' .. ..-. ~ ~.- --oJ."--. --.- --- . . ~. r.A4L...'
I _ . . ._ _ . _ ._. __. _ . _ _ _ __.
~fJ7). '
. ... ........ . - . '/ -
/; "- ~ aiId
--fA $1" " <<f ,... 'C , un , , ," --7'
J / ^' If; tllid-~- d)' '."... .~ Tv covelL
rf6V-~ e,1-C. " "
'J ,jJs ~(~oJfJD/ 'fll/IA.:rc;fok '.J.. dj~/,~ /4ML
J~,aejvM(J~(21'';'' ~ )~C~/ JY11 ~
,~oJ;on. (!j(ca/t; 7V(?dIJ~ /l/J-~ / ~lUIo
. d is ~ .ft/r{/)l eV~ M ~ gCJo~
!;NO ~ ~,
T7"'-.TllTTIT"., ",..",
: " ~el~(d0- /e~/r/fjffVt; fd l!Jfecure-J/Jrff If' J-M2L
l/lj reJa;;js ~ ~mw Vbf4 J 4t
hJ.Jf,U1~Jvjool~ j6</la/ ~C/~ Ihff~ A . < ~
Cll1rc(JLoir) 1IM1~' .... ....
.wjJ ~ wlAf wA ~ o1~r{/l!~ .'-
. .. . I ~,d I J . rdf~~.
4;. ~r ~A
rfr~JeGf fr~//hdjjJ ;t~f;j}; ~
. '. ~ h~w1lJJ1)/ ~ /vl )~~
r~ HI' ell J' /J11ft !e~ fl4Q. 71!6/~ rt~ I
C/!ri1k ;L/ - i {) ~ ~e.
.