HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5900 11/16/1998
.
ORDINANCE NO.
5900
(EMERGENCY)
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD
METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN TO MODIFY SECTIONS II-C-! AND IV-2 AND
TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION FOR GLENWOOD FROM EUGENE TO SPRINGFIELD;
ADOPTING SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
The City Council of the City of Springfield finds that:
'''-,
A. Chapter IV of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan ("Metro Plan") sets forth
procedures for amendment of the Metro Plan, which for Springfield are implemented by the provisions of the
Springfield Development Code Article 7.
B. Chapter IV (4)(a) of the Metro Plan allows anyone of the three governing bodies to initiate a
Type I amendrnent to the Metro Plan.
C. The Springfield City Council.y.?ted to initiate a Type I text amendment to the Metro Plan,
transferring jurisdiction for Glenwood from Eugene.to Springfield, at a meeting of the Joint Elected Officials on
September 15, 1998.
.
D. The Eugene City Council voted to support initiation of a Type I text amendment to the Metro Plan
transferring jurisdiction of Glen wood from Eugene to Springfield at its regular session on September 21, 1998.
E. At a joint public hearing on October 13, 1998 with the Planning Commissions of Springfield and
Eugene, the Lane County Planning Comrnission reviewed the proposal.
F. At the joint public hearing on October 13, 1998 the Springfield Planning Commission voted to
recommend approval ofthe proposal.
G. Evidence exists within the record as set forth in Exhibit A attached, indicating that the proposal
meets the requirements of the Springfield Development Code Article 7, and the requirements of the applicable
state and local law.
H. The Springfield City Council conducted a public hearing at a meeting ofthe Joint Elected Officials
of Eugene, Springfield and Lane County on November 16, 1998 and is now ready to take action;
I. Article 7.100 (4) of the Springfield Development Code sets the effective date of an ordinance
amending the Metro Plan as "the date the last governing body acts."
NOW, THEREFORE, THE SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section l. Section II-C, page II-:C-I of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan IS
amended to read as follows:
.
"C.
Eu!!ene and Sprin!!field Jurisdictional Responsibilitv
~
.
The division of responsibility between the two cities is the Interstate 5 Highway. However, state law
(1981) provides a mechanism for creation of a new city in the River Road-Santa Clara area."
Section 2. Policy S.b., Page IV-2 of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan is amended
to read as follows:
"5.b. A site specific Type I Metropolitan Plan amendment that involves a UGB expansion or Plan
Boundary change and a Type II Metropolitan Plan amendment between the city limits and Plan
Boundary, must be approved by the home city and Lane County (Springfield is the home city for
amendments east of 1-5, and Eugene is the home city for amendments west of 1-5). The non-home
city will be sent a referral of the proposed amendment and, based upon a determination that the
proposal will have Regional Impact, may participate in the decision. Unless the non-home city
makes affirmative findings of Regional Impact, the non-home city will not participate in the
decision."
Section 3. This amendment is hereby found and determined to impact the public health, safety and
welfare, and that an emergency exists, and that there is a need to coordinate the effective date of this
ordinance with the City of Eugene and Lane County, the. other governing bodies party to the Eugene-
Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. Therefore this ordinance shall take effect on the date the last
governing body acts to approve the amendments specified in Sections 1 and 2 as specified in Article 7.100
(4) of the Springfield Development Code.
.
,FURTHER, although not part of this Ordinance, the Springfield City Council adopts Findings as set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached, in support of this action.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or
unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity to the remaining portions hereof.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 6 for and 0 against
this 16 th day of November, 1998. - -
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 16th day of November, 1998.
ATTEST:
gdl~
Mayor
~~,~
City Re der
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DECISION CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF FACT
Except where noted otherwise, this staff evaluation and the following findings are based on information
presented in the May 4, 1998 report, Glenwood Jurisdictional Study (Attachment B), prepared by the City
of Springfield and included as part of the record of the October 13, 1998 joint public hearing.
,
Criteria #1 SDC 7.070(3)(a), EC 9.128 (3)(a), and LC 12.225(2)(a): The amendment must be
consistent with the relevant statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and
Development Commission.
Goall-Citizen Involvement: To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity
for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process.
.
Significant informal public input has occurred with respect to jurisdictional issues dating back to 1993,
including a petition signed by 450 residents, a Springfield Summit, Springfield Chamber of Commerce
Futures Committee events, a design project by students from the University of Oregon School of .
Architecture, newsletters, surveys, and an open house sponsored by the City of Springfield.
On August 27, 1998 notice of a September 16 joint public meeting where the elected officials of Eugene,
Springfield and Lane County considered initiation of the Metro Plan amendment was mailed to the
interested parties list in the Glenwood area. Additional notice of the meeting was accomplished through
display ads published in the Register Guard and Springfield News on September 5, 12, 14, and 16. A
news release was provided to the media on September 8 together with public service announcements.
Flyers providing notice of the September 16 initiation meeting were also posted on community bulletin
boards in the Glenwood area. About 65 people attended the September 16 meeting and many people
provided oral or written comment at that meeting (see Attachment C for meeting minutes and written
comments).
This Metro Plan amendment proposal is subject to the public notification and hearing
processes adopted by the City of Springfield in SDC 7.100, City of Eugene in EC 9.118 to 9.136, and
Lane County in LC 12.240. The amendments will be considered at a joint public hearing before the
Springfield, Eugene, and Lane County Planning Commissions on October 13, 1998. Notice of the
Planning Commissions public hearing will be published in the Register-Guard and the Springfield News.
Written notice of the Joint Planning Commissions public hearing will be mailed to residents and property
owners in Glenwood, those submitting comments at the September 16, 1998 joint elected official meeting,
and persons who have requested notice. Minutes and public comments from the September 16, 1998 joint
.
.
elected official meeting, attached to this staff report as Attachment C, were included as part of the record
of the October 13, 1998 joint planning commission public hearing.
Following a recommendation from the planning commissions, the Springfield and Eugene City Councils
and Lane County Board of Commissioners will hold a duly noticed, on the record, joint public hearing on
November 16, 1998 to consider approval, modification, or denial of the amendments. Notice of the
proposed amendments was sent to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development
(DLCD) on September 23, 1998, at least 45 days prior to the November 16, 1998 hearing on the
amendments.
These processes afford ample opportunity for citizen involvement consistent with Goal 1. Therefore, the
amendments are consistent with statewide planning Goal 1.
Goal2-Land Use Planning: To establish a land use planning process and policy framework
as a basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for
such decisions and actions.
This application to amend the Metro Plan text is consistent with Plan amendment provisions found in the
Metro Plan, as codified in the Eugene Code, Springfield Development Code and Lane County Code. The
Metro Plan is an acknowledged comprehensive plan, pursuant to provisions specified by the Land
. Conservation and Development Commission.
On September 16, 1998, the Springfield City Council initiated this Type I Metro Plan text amendment.
Provisions in the Springfield Development Code (SDC 77.010 to 7.110), Eugene Code (EC 9.118 to
9.136), and Lane Code (LC 12.240) specify the means by which the Metro Plan may be amended. This
proposal, and the process for reviewing the requested amendments, follow the procedures outlined in the
Springfield, Eugene, and Lane County Codes, thus conforming with the established land use planning
process consistent with Goal 2.
Goal3-Agricultural Land: To preserve and maintain agricultural lands.
There are no lands designated for agricultural use in Glenwood. According to the 1990 Glenwood
Refinement Plan, there are about 38 acres zoned for agriculture in the southern end of Glenwood along
Interstate 5. This zoning is interim, i.e., the plan designation governs ultimate use of the land. The Metro
Plan diagram designates this area Parks and Open Space. This designation is not affected by the transfer
of jurisdiction.
No plan designations are changed by the proposed amendments. Therefore, the amendments do not
affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 3.
. Goal 4-Forest Land: To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to
.
protect the state's forest economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure
the continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree species as the leading use on forest land consistent
with sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for recreational
opportunities and agriculture.
There are no forest lands related to this proposal and no plan designations are changed by the proposed
amendments. Therefore, the amendments do not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 4.
Goal5--0pen Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources: To conserve open
space and protect natural and scenic resources.
Two areas in Glenwood are designated Parks and Open Space in the Metro Plan diagram: the Laurel Hill
cemetery on Judkins Road and the area between 1-5 and the railroad tracks in southeast Glenwood,
described above in the discussion of compliance with Goal 3. These designations are not affected by the
transfer of jurisdiction.
According to the 1990 Glenwood Refinement Plan, an inventory of potentially regulated wetlands in
Glenwood indicates that the major wetland areas are in and around the slough north of the railroad tracks
on both sides of Glenwood Boulevard. Both of these areas act as natural drainageways in Glenwood.
Their function in relation to storm drainage is addressed in the Eugene Comprehensive Stormwater
. Management Plan, November, 1993 and Eugene basin planning efforts, now underway.
The adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan contains the following policy related to wetlands:
"2. Significant wetland areas in Glenwood shall be protected from encroachment and degradation in
order to retain their important functions and values related to fish and wildlife habitat, flood
control, sediment and erosion control, wat~r quality control, and groundwater pollution control."
(Environmental Design Policy #2, page 92)
The 1992 Draft Metropolitan Natural Resources Functional Plan identifies two natural resource sites in
Glenwood. A riparian area about 22 acres in size and the riparian area along the Willamette River. The
inventory is in the process of being updated; and updated or new study recommendations will be proposed
as part of periodic review.
The amendments do not change Goal 5 inventoried resources in Glenwood. Therefore, the amendments
do not affect compliance with Goal 5.
Goal6-Air, Water and Land Resources Quality: To maintain and improve the quality of the
air, water and land resources of the state.
.
.
The proposal for Metro Plan text amendments to transfer jurisdiction of Glenwood does not concern waste
and process discharges that would impact the quality of air, water, and land resources. Any and all future
development in the area will comply with all local, state, and federal standards and guidelines and will be
consistent with the Metro Plan diagram which is not proposed for change as part of this proposal. Goal 6
considerations will be addressed by the City of Springfield, following the transition, through the site
planning process as future development occurs in the area. The proposal for a Metro Plan text amendment
does not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 6.
Goal 7-Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards: To protect life and property from
natural disasters and hazards.
According to the Glenwood Refinement Plan, a significant portion of Glenwood's river frontage,
especially south of the Springfield Bridge, is within the 100-year flood zone; some of this property is also
within the floodway. The floodway includes the actual channel of the river and the part of the adjacent
floodplain that must be served for the flow of floodwaters. In both Eugene and Springfield, new
construction can occur in the flood hazard area outside the flood way if the floor elevation is constructed
one foot above the base flood elevation.
.
As part of a development request, any future construction in these areas would have to comply with
Springfield Development Code regulations concerning construction within the floodplain. This would
also be the case if the area remained in Eugene. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 7
and continued compliance will occur through protections established by the City of Springfield's
floodplain development regulations. The amendments will not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 7.
GoalS-Recreational Needs: To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and
visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including
destination resorts.
Willamalane Park and Recreation District has continued to make its facilities and services available to
residents in Glenwood without requiring out-of-district fees. Following transition to Springfield,
Willamalane Park and Recreation District will provide park services to the area. Therefore, the
amendments comply with Goal 8.
Goal 9-Economic Development: To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for
a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon 's citizens.
The proposed Metro Plan text amendments do not change Metro Plan diagram designations or economic
development policies. Therefore, the amendments will not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 9.
.
GoallO-Housing: To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state.
.
.
.
The adopted Metro Plan was acknowledged by LCDC to be in compliance with Goal 10. The proposed
Metro Plan amendments do not change Metro Plan diagram designations or housing policies. Thus, the
amendments will not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 10.
Goalll-Public Facilities and Services: To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient
arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework.for urban and rural development.
Glenwood properties now within Eugene city limits are provided services by the City of Eugene for
sanitary sewers, stormwater management, parks and recreation, land use planning and building, roads,
police, and fire and emergency medical; by EWEB for water and electric; and Eugene 4J School District
for schools. There is a mutual aid agreement for fire by which Springfield Fire and Life Safety responds
to Glenwood properties inside Eugene. Solid waste collection is provided by individuals or by private
haulers with regional transfer and disposal managed by Lane County.
The Metro Plan provides for land in the UGB to be converted to urban land following annexation when a
minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly and efficient manner;
that a full range of services be provided based on need and budgetary priorities; and that Eugene and
EWEB and Springfield and SUB shall be the water and electric service providers within the UGB, as
stated in the following Metro Plan policies.
"7. Land within the urban growth boundary may be converted from urbanizable to urban only
through annexation to a city when it is found that:
a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area in an
orderly and efficient manner. They consist of sanitary sewers, solid waste management,
water service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, parks and
recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, communication facilities, and
public schools on a district-wide basis (in other words, not necessarily within walking
distance of all students served). Paved streets with adequate provision for stormwater
runoff and pedestrian travel, meeting applicable local policies, are important, particularly
in new developments and along existing streets heavily used by pedestrians." (Metro
Plan Policy #7, page II-B-4)
"8. A full range of key urban facilities and services shall be provided to urban areas according to
demonstrated need and budgetary priorities. They include, in addition to the minimum level
of key urban facilities and services, urban public transit, natural gas, storm drainage
facilities, street lighting, libraries, local parks, local recreation facilities and services, and
health services." (Metro Plan Policy #8, page II - B-4)
"16. Eugene and Springfield and their respective utility branches, Eugene Water and Electric
Board and Springfield Utility Board, shall be the water and electrical service providers
within the urban growth boundary." (Metro Plan Policy #16, page II-B-6)
.
Following adoption of the proposed Metro Plan text amendments, Springfield and Eugene and their
respective utilities, EWEB and SUB, will engage in a process to transition service provision in Glenwood
from Eugene to Springfield. This transition process will need to address servicing issues related to the
incorporated portions of Glenwood because these areas are now receiving municipal services from
Eugene. Intergovernmental agreements will be revised or developed to ensure service levels are
maintained in incorporated areas during the transition.
The proposed Metro Plan amendments will transfer from Eugene to Springfield ultimate responsibility for
providing services to Glenwood. The City of Eugene has made a major investment in Glenwood in
expenditures for sanitary sewers and development of the Glenwood Refinement Plan. An
intergovernmental agreement between Eugene and Springfield to reimburse Eugene for these costs will
accompany the ordinance to amend the Metro Plan text; and the Cities of Springfield and Eugene will
coordinate with Lane County to amend the separate Urban Transition Agreements On Streets and Roads
to reflect the transfer of jurisdiction.
The May 4, 1998 Glenwood Jurisdictional Study identifies a number of issues related to the provision of
services to Glenwood. The ordinance adopting these Metro Plan text amendments and the accompanying
intergovernmental agreement will include actions to be taken to resolve issues associated with the
transfer. These actions will ensure a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and
services to serve Glenwood.
. This proposal does not change project lists in the Eugene-Springfield Public Facilities Plan (PFP).
Following a transfer of jurisdiction, key urban facilities and services will continue to be provided to
incorporated areas in Glenwood consistent with the Metro Plan. Project lists in the PFP will not be
affected by this proposal. Therefore, this proposal is in compliance with Goal 11.
Goal 12- Transportation: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic
transportation system.
The proposal will change service providers in the incorporated area of Glenwood from the City of Eugene
to the City of Springfield. Springfield will maintain the same level of service in incorporated areas and
will provide service to newly annexing areas. All of the road projects in Glenwood in the Metropolitan
Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) are on the state system.
Section 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule requires evaluation of a comprehensive plan
amendment to determine if the amendment significantly affects a transportation facility. The proposed
Metro Plan text amendments do not: change the functional classification of an existing or planned
transportation facility; change standards implementing a functional classification system; allow types or
levels of land uses which would result in levels of travel or access which are inconsistent with the
functional classification of a transportation facility; or reduce the level of service of a facility below the
minimum acceptable level identified in the Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan).
.
.
The proposed amendments will not significantly affect a transportation facility and will not affect
compliance with policies or projects contained in TransPlan, a functional refinement to the Metro Plan,
acknowledged as complying with the requirements of Goal 12. Therefore, the amendments will not affect
Metro Plan compliance with Goal 12.
Goal 13-Energy Conservation: To conserve energy.
This Goal is not relevant because the amendments do not involve any additional development
that would consider energy conservation systems, or the recycling and reuse of vacant land per the
guidelines associated with Goal 13. The amendments will not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal
13.
Goall4-Urbanization: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban
land use.
Glenwood is within the metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary and has been or can be provided all
necessary urban services. The amendments do not convert land from rural to urban use. Therefore, this.
Goal is not relevant and the amendments will notaffect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 14.
.
Goal 15-Willamette River Greenway: To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the
natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands aloYJg-the
Willamette River as the Willamette River Greenway.
Policy 6 in the Metro Plan Willamette River Greenway Element states that "New industrial development
that locates along the Willamette and McKenzie Rivers shall enhance natural, scenic, and environmental
qualities" (page III-D-4). Metro Plan policy applies to the Glenwood area regardless of whether the area
is within Eugene's or Springfield's jurisdiction. Therefore, the amendments will not affect Metro Plan
compliance with Goal 15.
Goals 16 through 19 (Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes, and Ocean'
Resources):
There are no coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune resources involved in the amendments.
Therefore, these Goals are not relevant and the amendments will not affect Metro Plan compliance with
Goals 16 through 19.
Criteria #2 SDC 7.070(3)(b), EC 9.128 (3)(b), and LC 12.225(2)(b): Adoption of the amendment
must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent.
\
.
The Metro Plan text amendments will not create any internal inconsistencies in the Metro Plan. Metro
Plan policy calls for the City of Springfield and SUB and the City of Eugene and EWEB to be the water
. . .
.
and electrical service providers within the urban growth boundary (Metro Plan Growth Management and
Urban Service Area Policy # 16, page II-B-6). This amendment transfers jurisdiction of Glenwood from
one city and to the other. Services will continue to be provided to the area by the current providers until
the transfer is complete, consistent with this policy. Thus, the proposed Metro Plan text amendments will
not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Based on the findings in this staff report, the proposed amendments to the Metro Plan text are consistent
with relevant statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission;
and adoption of the amendments will not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. F or these reasons,
staff recommends adoption of the proposed Metro Plan text amendments.
.
.