HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 19 Springfield Fire Station #16 - Recommend Construction Manager/General Contractor P20534
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL.
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
December 3,2007
Regular sessio~.
City Manager's . Ice
Carole Knape
726-3672
5 minutes
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ITE~ TITLE:
SPRINGFIELD FIRE STATION #16 - RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER I GENERAL CONTRACTOR P- 20534
ACTION
REQUESTED:
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
Authorize staff to conduct contract negotiations with John Hyland Const. Inc.
On October 1,2007, the Council authorized the construction of the Springfield Fire
Station #16 project through the use of the construction manager / general contractor
(CMlGC) process. .
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Score Sheet Summary
DISCUSSION/ The City received two proposals in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for
FINANCIAL CMlGC services for the Springfield Fire Station #16 Replacement project.
IMPACT: Proposals were submitted by John Hyland Const. Inc. and McKenzie Commercial.
The proposals were reviewed in accordance with the published selection criteria including the experience
of the fIrm, the experience of the proposed staff, the fIrm's approach to the project, the fIrm's knowledge of
the local construction industry and the proposed fee for the work. The Selection Committee included Dave
Puent, Al Peroutka, Carol Stineman, Mark Walker, Paul von Rotz, and Carole Knapel. The project
architect participated as a non-voting member.
Each proposal was reviewed and scored by each committee member and the firms were then interviewed
on October 29, 2007. Each member could award up to 175 maximum points combined for the written
proposal and the oralinterview. Both fIrms were determined to be well-qualifIed to complete this project.
The average of all scores for John Hyland Constr. Inc. was 154.33 and the average of all scores for
McKenzie Commercial was 154.25. While the scores are virtually tied, the staff is recommending the
selection of John Hyland Const. Inc. based on two factors. First, Hyland proposed a fee of 4.95%
(approximately $87,615) for the work, while McKenzie was slightly higher at 5.5% (approximately
$97,350). Second, Hyland's proposed on-site project manager has served in this role on other projects of a
similar size while McKenzies' s proposed on-site staff did not have the same level of previous experience.
Staff is requesting authorization to proceed to negotiate a contract with John Hyland Const. Inc. for
Construction Manager/General Contractor services for the Thurston Fire Station # 16 Project. Once a
contract has been negotiated, staffwill return to the City Council in January 2008 to request approval of the
agreement.
Score Summary Sheet
CM/GC Selection
Fire Station #16
Interview Questions/Criteria
Qualifications. experience and time commitment of key personnel that will work on the
project. Manner in which team is organized, and how much time the key players will be
committed to the Fire Station ro"ect.
Fee Breakdown
Cost Estimatin Process
Quali of the Presentation
TOTALS INTERVIEW:
I
I
TOTALS (RFP):I
TOTALS(COM6INEDSCQRES...FQRRFP'&:INTERVIEW):!II\
Attachment 1
...... -.. ,..
....."",. -- ---""...
......." --- -".....
.... -- ...".....
M~Kel1zi~
13.67 12.00
14.33 13.50
12.00 13.83
12.50 12.83
13.17 13.67
65.67 65.83
88.67 I 88.42 I
154;33\) m:t" 154;25 ,'I