Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Building 2002-8-5 .. Community Services Div, Building Safely CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 51h Slreet, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759 Job Address 283-9 i\mb 1 cs i d::; Dr. City Job # ~ '~:::.i...':~'~:.. ~_-'-"_' '~.::.'-'--:' .- . ---- :;l;.._ ':~, - -.. _._~~ _ ::::- .._....." .. AMBLESIDE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION-1sT ADDITION Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals foundation requirements - new structures on residential lots This form may be used as a temporary verification to allow construction to continue on the job site until the consultant's stamped affidavit on the site soil compaction and stabilization is submitted to the City. This form must be completed by a licensed design professional (engineer or architect) or hislher authorized employee, and submitted to the building inspector prior to requesting City inspections or placing foundation concrete. It is important that all questions be answered completely for the foundation site to be approved for construction. Owner and/or Contractor Dev Sharma - 1325 R St.. Sorinafield. OR 1. Date of the design professional's site evaluation? Auqust 5-7. 2002 ,2. Has the design professional reviewed a copy of the geotechnical information for the subdivision that was provided with the building permit? Yes...x.. No_ If not, please contact this office for a copy of the report. The design professional must he familiar with the geotechnical information before completing this form, 3. What was the size and depth of the excavation and lor fili? -Ihp PYr~inn w~s arrrox;m~tply RO' x S~' and concict~ n~ t~ terraces with a maximum depth of 4 to 5-ft. -Rll rnns,; ~t~ nf " thi n 1 i f~t....) 11'>cc th"n Ll.-inchl'>c) I"lf crllshed aggregate on the foundation area. Was existing non-structural fill or expansive soil encountered on the lot? Yes_ No-xx If "yes", what types, depths and locations? What measures were taken to remedy the soil condition (include type of engineered fill used to stabilize the soil)? Sn; 1 c; nn t hp ci t Cl r nm i ct IlL 1 to 2-ft. of dark brown. plastic orqammc siltv too soil and silts over highly weathered tuffaceous rock with igneous and sedimentary cobbles and boulders. The organic/silty top layer was removed and disposed off-site. 1 ~ COll1ll1unity St.:rvit.:t.:s Div, Building Safely CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 51h Strt.:t.:l, SpringfielJ, OR 97477 Ph,726-3759 Job Address City Job # 3589 Amblesirl~ Drive 2QQ2,Q7~02l9 The foundrttinn ~xrilvilion IAdll hI" rlrainerl h.y 1) perf~rat@.o;i p~-P-e-in french-type dra 1 n a 1 onq back of e~caVrtti on wi th thp C:;llrfi'lrp of thp exposed decomposed tuff sloping back to the ~rain. THis drain will ~xtend on each_side.of the excavation and ~aylight downslope ' L) C 0 rJ V ern: ! 0 n a I perl met e r, perT 0 rat e d d r a 1 n s s h 0 u I d be p 1 ace d a t of 00 tin 9 1 e.ve 1. and dqy,l i qhte.rJ downHop.e D .. , Is the SHe as prepared' aaequate l.iI Inadequate to mamtam constant mOIsture content in the sub grade? Note: Verification of moisture stabilization in the sub grade is a requirement of the geotechnical report, and must be affinned before construction can continue. If inadequate, what measures are needed to provide constant moisture content in the sub grade? Is the site as prepared adequate 0 inadequate D to support the proposed structure? An affirmative answer is requisite to proceeding with construction. If inadequate, what additional work is needed to provide adequate foundation support? 4. Did the design professional witness placement and compaction of the engineered fill, or is there a special inspection report forthcoming from a q~alified .agency? I w.itnessed Plac~ment 0 Special Insp/compaction report 0 eiM~ Thl s proJ ect conta 1 ns no "engl nee red II fill (A~ r; 'f- A.M.&-." 1.,\t~:n:.J L7 5. The design professional intends to use the following method for installation of perforated perimeter footing drains: The design on the attached drawing provided by the design professional ...... 0 The method shown on the original construction drawings......................... 0 The typical 'Foundation Drain' drawing attached to permit ..................... ;Q Perforated perimeter drains are not required ....,.................................. D Comments: Note: City inspectors will inspect installed drains prior to cover upon request... Call: 726-3769 to schedule inspection. 2 ~. COllll11unity Services Div, Building Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 22'1 )111 Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph,726-3759 Job Address i5Rg Al11b 11'><:: i riP nr. City Job #2002-07-0219 Low-point crawl space drains are required to prevent the build-up of excess moisture inside the foundations during (and after) construction. This drain may be installed after foundation placement onlv with the express permission of the deshm professional. a. The design professional has determined the following: The crawl space drain is required when the foundation is installed..... D The low-point drain can ~e installed after foundation placement without a significant moisture build-up problem within the foundation............. Q (The low-point drain may be installed at the frrlmi n(l stage J t t' ) post & bean" framTng, roofing, ete, OJ cons rue IOn b. Has the design professional observed and approved the installation of the required low point drain?................................... Yes, No K if "yes", where is the low point drain located under the building and where does it terminate at this time? (must be an approved location, i.e. street gutter, storm sewer, sump pump and discharge line to the street, etc.) The design professional must determine whether the approved permit drawings have adequate foundation steel. Is any additional foundation steel required that is not shown on the foundation drawings for the building? Yes ,<x No ,If "yes", describe additional steel required (or provide drawing). The following statement must be signed by the individual doing the observations and providing direction for the excavation and site preparation work on the property. 3 ComJl1unity Scrviu:s Div, Building Safety CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 2255'11 Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-:'759 Job Address ~l)g9 Amh 1 p, i d.e-D.,rj VP City Job # 2-02-07 -0219 The undersigned design professional (or authorized employee) attests that he/she observed required moisture stability procedures on this site, and that such procedures were accomplished before any changes occurred in the moisture content of the sub- grade under and around the building (where expansive soils were encountered). The undersigned further attests that the sub-grade, as prepared, is adequate to support the building proposed for this site. Additional comments: (ooti ngs shaul d 2)(:cnd t3 ~n'3i ~t~,:"t~<:~'t~ered tuff';H'o/").lIC: Y'nrk< Q~ ~~0~~tructed on comr~rtprl ,plprt Qr~nr fill romOor.eted to Ldry rlPa.illy pqlJol to or esceedinq 95% of ASTM 0698. Select qr~nular fill should extend to undisturbed tuff.~I:ill (Note): A copy of this report shall be kept on site with the approved plans at all times. This report shall be followed by an affidavit, signed and stamped by the design professional under whose auspices this report was completed, affinning the information herein, The signed/stamped affidavit together with a copy of this report shall be submitted to this office prior to requesting framing inspection for the building. Signature Name Mirhoel Rembo1dt Company K & A Enqineerinq, Inc. Phone 684-9399 Title President/Principle Enqineer Licensee ~,~irh"ol Romhnlrlt License # 19474 expires 12/31/2002 The geotechnical report for the Ambleside Meadows - 1 sl Addition Subdivision recommends immediate moisture stabilization of exposed expansive sub-grades, and that expansive soils be over-excavated and replaced with at least 12 inches of fill compacted to at least 95% of ASTM D698 for foundation preparation. The report also recommends that measures be taken to prevent water from collecting in or around the foundation areas during and after the construction process, and that positive site drainage be provided to reduce the infiltration of surface water into the expansive soils. The geotechnical report further emphasizes that the finish grade of landscape soil adjacent to the foundation should be at least 24" above the expansive bearing soils, firmlv comDacted to reduce the infiltration of water at the surface. The adequacy of fill soil material around the building must be verified to the satisfaction of the design professional. 4 . ~ .# Community ScrviCl:s Div, Building Safely CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 225 51h Street. Springfield, OR 97477 Ph,726-3759 Job Address 3589 Ambleside Drive City Job# ?nn?~n7-n?lq "; ~... ~:.._......__ J>. _. ___ __.. _. ~ ~__ .-..._~_ _....... ~...~ ~_ _.... ____ ~_ ,: ~ ... _ ...... - Affidavit For Site Investigation Questionnaire ./ Foundation Sub-Grade Approval for Residential Building Site in Ambleside Meadows - 1 st Addition Subdivision The undersigned hereby affinns that the excavation, structural fill and moisture stabilization methods for the building site at the address shown above was observed by me or an authorized employee of my finn and that the following is true: I. The foundation sub-grade is capable of supporting a minimum of 1500 psf, and is adequate to support the building proposed for this site. 2. The moisture content of the excavation was adequately maintained during the site preparation process and was adequately covered to stabilized moisture content prior to any significant change in moisture content of the sub-grade. 3. The site is adequately graded and drained to prevent the collection of water in the excavated area during construction. 4. The accompanying report titled "Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals" containing field observations and instructions made on Augus t 5-7. 2002 ,(date) for the building site was completed either by myself or by an employee of my finn under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in that report is complete and accurate. Name of Licensed Professional (print) Michael , -........... Signature' S<I ~,,~,~ , I .~ 0 Date---Au..gIJst 7 _ 2002 ~'---- .,...__...._-.-'._~.-.......- "". . .. . ...... ,. ... ...,.-..~