HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Building 2003-4-17
"
Apr-18-2003 12:46pm From-K & A Engin88rin., Inc,
+541-684-9358
T-172 P,ODZ/OD6 F-647
r.
Community Service" Div, Building SlIfc:ty
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 5111 Streel, Springllold, OR 97477 Ph. 72ti.~759
Job Address 2388 - 35th St.
City Job * COM2,QQ3",QQ2,19
AMBLESIDE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION--lST ADDITION
Site ,Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting Design Professionals
oun anon requIrements - new structures on res! ent ot&
This form may be used 81 a temporary verification to;1low construmon to contiDue
,on the Job site until the consultant's stamped amdaVi~'?" the site soil compaction
and stabilization is submitted to the City. TIlls form m. be completed by a
licensed design professional (engineer or areldted) or lalslber authorized employee,
and submitted to the building inspector prior to requesting City inspections or
pladng foundation concrete. It Is important tbat .n questions be answered
eompletelyfor the foundation site to be approved for construction.
Owner and/or Contractor R1'ver Valley Bunders
1. Date of the desip professional's sate evalutlon?
April 17, 2003
2. Has the design professional reviewed a eopy of the geotechnkallDformatioR
for the subdivision that was provided with the building permtt? YelL No_
If not, please contact this office for a copy of the report. The design professional
must be familiar with the geotechnical information before completing this form.
3. What was the size and depth of the exeavatJon and lor fill?
The excavation 'or; ;nal1 made, in 1999} 1:5 IS proximately 45' x 50'
and ran!Jes 1 n dept !'"om - eet on t e $'OU S1 e 0 approxlma e,'y - nches
at the nortM Slae. ~nih' can"is:bd nf y@11aw/tan sandv-silts with large
sub-an~ular Qravels and cobbles. These soils are consistent with the
weathered tuff found on adjacent sitos
Was existing non.stnJctU1'8l fill or expansive soil encountered on the lot?
Yes_ NOEj If "yes''. what types, depths and locations?
What measures were taken to remedy the soil condi\ion (include type of .'
enAineered fill used to stabjUzethesoin? The. slte excavat,on 15 covered w1th
6 to f2..inches' 01' coarse 1.3-1nch minus) crusnea quarry rOCK tnat was well-
compacted. r16st of this fill wu plcal;t!.c1 lu l~!H) dud wo.~ Le:~Le:d b,y 1'51 (see attached)
1
Apr-18-2003 12:46pm From-K & A En.ineerin.. Inc,
+541-684-9358
T-172 P,003/006 F-647
Community Servj~lls Div. Building SlIfety
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
22~ ~I~ Street, Springlill1tl. OR 97477 Ph. 726-:\759
Job Addresli 2388 - 35th St.
City Job 41 COt12003-00219
Is the site as prepared adequate liJ inadequate 0 to maintain constant moisture
content in the sub grade? Note: Verification o!mo;sturt stabilization;n the sub
grade is a requirement o/the geotechnical report, and mUlt be, affirmed before
construction can continue.
If inadequate, what measures are needed to provide constant moisture content in
the sub grade?
<-
Is the site as prepared adequate JI int2iUquate 0 to support the proposed ,
shUcture? An affirmative answer is requisite to proceeding with construction.
It inadequate, what additional work is needed to provide adequate
foundation support?
4. Did the design professional witness placement anel compaction of the
engineered flU, or Is there a speciallnspect10n report forthcoming from II
qualified agency? 1 witnessed Placement 0 Speciallnsp/compact;on report .Ii
It(e. It(ftn.el'tad ::the., tl)P J '" 4 tncb.es, 9f ftll.' S'~, ~ttll,Ch.eif pst rapQrt f(:lr bottom rotl.
5. Tile deiip professional Intends to use the folloWBnl method for futallatlon
of perforated perimeter footing drains:
The design OD the attached drawing provided by the design professional...... 0
The method shown on the original construction drawings.. . .. .................... 0
The typical 'Foundation Drain' drawing attached to permit 00.0........ 0.0.0. o. . ~
Perforated perimeter drains are not tequired .0...0.0 ... .... ... ....... ..; ........... 0
Comments: .Ty.' e9",hwahJ',ba& t~s'talleS' a' 4...tneb,parferated <frat",
~pound tn~'p~r~p~~r ?f t~a~tClv~tt~R.
Note: City inspectors will inspect installed drains prior to cover upon request...
Call: 726-3769 to schedule inspection.
2
Apr-18-Z003 lZ:47pm From-K & A Engineerinl, Inc,
+541-684-9358
T-17Z P004/006 F-647
Community Services OJ,,, Building Surety
CITY OF SPR1NOFIELD, OREGON
22:; jlh Street, Springfield. OR 97477 Pit. 726.3759
lob Address 23gB.. 35t h St.
City Job #r.o~'nn1_nn?1 Q
Low-point crawl space dralns are required to prevent the build-up of excess
moisture Inside the foundatlollS durin. (and after) eonstroetlon. This drain
may be Installed l1li: foundation placement onlv'wlth ebe soress oermisslon
of the desllln Drofessional.
a. The design profe~ional has d~ermined the folJowing:
The crawl space drain is required when thefoundation is installed..... 0
The low-point drain can be installed after foundation placement without a
significant moisture build-up problem within the foundation............. ~
(The low-point drain may be installed at the .p"'tUll",Q stage
of construction) pos, & bBflm, /'fdfIIlfll. rooflllB. /lfe.
b. Has the design professional observed and approved the installation of the
required low point drain?...................... ............ Yes. _ No --X.X.
if "yes", where is the low point drain located under the building and
where does it 'terminate at this time? (must be an approved location, i.e.
street gutter, storm sewer, sump pump and discharge line to the street,
etc.)
The design professional must determine whether the approved permit drawings have
adequate foundation steel. Is any additional foundadon steel required that is not
shown on the foundation drawlDgs for the buDding?
YesQ- No _' if "yes", describe additional steel required (or provide drawing).
The following statement must be signed by the individual doin, the observations and
providing directionfor the excavation and site preparation work on the property.
3
Apr-18-2003 12:47pm From-K & A Engineering, Inc,
+541-684-9358
T-172 P,005/006 F-647
Communit)' Services Djv, Building Saf.:ty lob Address '1RR - 35th St.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON City Job # COM2003-000219
225 SIh Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
The "Mer.t,_ desl,n pro/adonal (or authorlt.ed emploJleCt) attests that he/site
observed retjutnd moisture stability procedUl'ft 011 this ,Ue, and that such p1VJceduru
wer, accomplishBtl before may changes occurrM In the moisture contBnt olth, ,u-
gl'tlde under and tII'Ound the buM in, (wh".e e%plln.iv. soils were Bncounter8d). The
undersigned furtJa". atte,', that the lub-grtMlB, lIS prepsred, it tul''lUllte to support the
building proposed/or this site.
Additional comments:
(Note): A copy of this report shaJl be kept on site with the approved plans at all
times.
This report shall be followed by an affidavit, signed and stamped by the design
professional under whose auspices this report was completed, affuming the information
herein. The signed/stamped affidavit together with a copy of this report shall be
submitted to,this office prior to requesting framing inspection for the building.
Signature ~~~ -v- ~
Name ~;chaA' Rpmhnlrlt, P F lldePrinr.ip'~ Enoin~er
Company K 1:; 4 EQ9hQ'i\'"1ng.lnc
Phone fiR4-(}:~gg
Lleensee ~1ichael Remboldt
License# 19474 expires 12/31/04
The geotechnical report for the Ambleside Meadows - lit Addition Subdivision
recommends immediate moisture stabilization of exposed expansive sub-grades, and that
expansive soils be over-excavated and replaced with at least 12 inches offill compacted
to at least 95% of ASTM 0698 for foundation preparation. The report also recommends
that measures be taken to prevent water from collecting in or around the foundation areas
during and after the construction process, and that positive site drainage be provided to
reduce the infiltration of surface water into the expansive soils.
The geotechnical report, further emphasizes that the finish grade of landscape soil
adjacent to the foundation should be at least 24" above the expansive bearing soils, finnlv
compacted to reduce the infiltration of water at the surface. The adequacy of fill soil
material around the building must be verified to the satisfaction of the design
professional.
4
Apr-18-2003 12:47pm From-K & A Enlin88rinl. Inc,
+541-684-9358
T-172 P,006/006 F-647
Communily Service,. Div, 'Building SltfelY
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 5lh Street, SJ'K'ingficld. OR 97477 Ph. 726-3759
Job Addresa ' 2388 - 35th St.
CityJob* COM?OQ~_nnn?lQ
Affidavit
For Site Investigation Questionnaire
Foundation Sub-Grade Approval for
Residential Building Site in Ambleside Meadows - 1st Addition
Subdivision
The undersigned hereby affirms that the excavation, structural fill and moisture
stabilization methods for the building site at the address shown above WIl8 observed by
me or an authorized employee of my firm and that the fonowing is true:
1. The foundation sub-grade is capable of supporting a minimum of 1500 psf, and is
adequate to support the building proposed for this site.
2. The moisture content of the excavation was adequately maintained during the site
preparation process and was adequately covered to stabilized moisture content
prior to any significant change in moisture content of the sub-grade.
3. The site is adequately graded and drained to prevent the collection of water in the
excavated area during construction.
4. The accompanying report titled "Site Investigation Questionnaire for Consulting
Design Professionals" containing field obselVations and instructions made on
Ap..t 1 17, ?om (date) for the building site was completed either by
myself or by an employee of my fmn under my supervision. To the best of my
knowledge, the information contained in that report is complete and lICCurate.
Name of Licensed Professional (print) Mi chae 1 Rambo 1 dt.
Signatu~ ~ -
.".
~- -
~
Date ADrf 1 18. 200
lP~;ll1iformati01i u
1:.". To Build On
..,......,. ~. ....,
FIELD DENSITY REPORT
SOIL AND SOIL-AGGREGATE
1040 - A Shelley Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
(541)746-9649 - (541)746-7163 fax
Pad at 33rd and V St. Springfield,OR
Date Performed:
P.O. No.:
B.P.No.:
Technician:
October 25, 1999
Letter
4
Client:
Address:
River Valley Builders, Inc,
Greg Larkin
PO Box 2041
Corvallis, OR 97339
Project No.:
Project:
Project
Location:
722-90435-7
Ambleside Subsivision House
Mike Dewey
Equipment: Troxler: 3430
SN: 27408
Laboratory Soil / Aggregate Data: Native Soil
*For percent moisture only,
Field Density Tests: Nuclear Method (ASTM 02922)
Test No. Approximate Test Location Approximate Dry Density Percent Percent
Test Elev. Ibs.lcu.ft. Moisture Compaction
, ,
1 Northeast corner of building pad excavation, lot #48, FSG 99,3 19,3 ----
2 Southeast corner of building pad excavation, lot #48 FSG 79,2 40,8 ----
3 Southwest corner of building pad excavation, lot #48 FSG 94,8 23.1 ----
4 Northwest corner of buildihg pad excavation, lot #48 FSG 84,6 20.3 ----
.;!
, ,
"
\ i
'i,
, ,
Tests performed at finished subgrade In tre locations listed above. ,
Test #1, 3, 4 = Fill, per Troy Hull, PE. Test #2 Cut, per Troy Hull, PE.
Test results were verbally reported to Jeff with River Valley Builders,
c:
~et~ ~
Raymond V. Aliperti, CS Dept. Manager
Springfield Branch
"
, THIS REPOpT I.') PROVIDED FOR THE INFORMA TlON OF THE CLIENT ONL y, THE REPRODUCTION OF THIS REPORT ~' . ~NY METHOD, AND ITS TRANSMITTAL TO A THIRD PARTY BY ANY MEANS EXCEPT IN FULL
IS PROHIP . WITHOUT
, , THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ; SSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES,
. '
~
l r" ~ ;1 [riformation
~~. .To Build On
Engineering. Consulting · Testing
DAILY FIELD REPORT
Date:
October 25, 1999
River Valley Builders, Inc.
Greg Larkin
PO Box 2041
Corvallis, OR 97339
Report Number:
722-90435-6
Client:
Project Name:
Ambleside Subdivision House
Project Location:
Pad - 33rd & V St.{Lot #48),
Springfield, OR
P.O. No.:
Type of Inspection:
Letter
Soils
Permit No.:
Weather:
Field Observations and Comments
PSI Representative observed proofroll of in-situ native soil (in southeast quadrant) and native soil fill (in the other three
quadrants) of the excavation for building pad within lot #48, Proofroll was conducted with a fully loaded dual-axle dump
truck, weighting approximately 48,000 Ibs. (per Jeff of River Valley Builders, Inc.). No rutting or deflections were
observed under wheel load, This result indicates of a firm, well consolidated subgrade,
.
PSI Representative conducted nuclear moisture measurements to determine whether subgrade moisture levels were at
or above the laboratory determined optimum moisture content of 26.5%, as required by Troy Hull, PE Engineer of
record, for subgrade acceptance, with exception of the southeast corner of the building pad which measured 40.8%
moisture. The rest of the pad displayed moisture content below the 26.5% specification. Please see our Field Density
Report No. 722-90435-7, for exact values.
PSI Representative informed Mr. Greg Larkin of River Valley Builders, of these results. Mr. Larkin indicated that he
, would proceed with placement of crushed rock fill of less than 4 inch thickness at the time and that he would contact PSI
at a later date this winter to re-evaluate the subgrade moisture condition.
Inspector: Mike Dewey
!'
If you have any questions regarding this report; please feel free to contact us at 541-746-9649.
:~dUIIY~ ~
',.' Raymond V. Aliperti, CS Dept. Manager
Springfield Branch
c:
THIS REPORT IS PROVIDED FOR THE INFORMA nON OF THE CLIENT ONL y, THE REPRODUCTION OF THIS REPORT, BY ANY METHOD, AND ITS TRANSMITTAL TO A THIRD
PARTY, BY ANY MEANS, EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, IS PROHIBITED,
Professional Service Industries, Inc,. 1040A Shelley St.. Springfield, QR 97477. Phone 541/746-9649. Fax 541/746'7163