HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09 Annexatoin of Territory to the City of Springfield (Evans, Case Number LRP2007-00018)
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
November 5, 2007
Regular Meeting
Development Services
Steve HOPkins.~~.
x3649 hj)k).
10 minutes VV(y-'
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
ACTION
REQUESTED:
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
(Evans, Case Number LRP2007 -000 18)
Conduct a public hearing and adopt/not adopt the following resolution: A RESOLUTION
INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY
COMMISSION APPROVES THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS.
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
ATTACHMENTS:
DISCUSSION:
The property owners, Michael Evans and Geraldine Betz, have requested annexation of
approximately 0.69 acre of property located at 2793 Pheasant Blvd. The subject territory is
described as Assessor's Map Number, I 7-03-22-42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700 and more
accurately described in Attachment I, Exhibit A. The site contains one residence.
Article 6.030(2) of the Springfield Development Code requires that territories considered for
annexation must be provided with "key urban facilities and services", as defined in Metro Plan
Policy 8.a, Page II-B-4. Among these key urban services are water, sewer, storm water facilities,
streets, electricity, parks, fire/emergency services, and schools. Based on analysis and comments
from the service providers, staff finds that all key urban services are available to serve the territory.
Attachment 1: Resolution
Attachment 2: Informational Attachment
Attachment 3: Vicinity Map
Attachment 4: Submittal from Applicant
The City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation using the triple
majority method. This requires consent in writing from a majority of the land owners of the
territory to be annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the territory proposed to be
annexed and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real
property in the territory proposed to be annexed. Oakdale Avenue between Game Farm Rd. and
Pheasant Blvd. is also being annexed as part of this process.
The property is comprised of three lots. Electric, water, telephone, cable and natural gas are
stubbed to each lot. Although none of the lots are connected to sanitary sewer, there is an 8"
sanitary line approximately 160' west of the subject property within Oakdale Avenue, west of
Pheasant Boulevard. There is also a 24" sanitary line approximately 250' south of the subject
property. Each lot must connect to sanitary service prior to development.
The City Council Resolution will be forwarded to the Lane County Local Government Boundary
Commission. The owners are requesting the Expedited Annexation procedure of the Boundary
Commission.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS.
WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex 0.69 acre into the City of Springfield on May 9,
2007, said territory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500,.2600 and 2700,
including a portion of Oakdale Avenue, and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this
Resolution.
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed IS within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth
Boundary, and is adjacent to the City Limits; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS. 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon
receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be
annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the territory proposed to be annexed and of real
property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory
proposed to be annexed; and,
WHEREAS, the property owners of the certain territory described in Exhibit A signed a consent to annex
(Exhibit B); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.030(2)(a) and ORS
222.111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the territory in the
annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services in an
orderly and efficient manner as defined in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, page ll-
B-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deUver urban services and facilities;
and
WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro
Area General Plan, page V-3 as wastewater service, stormwater service, solid waste management, water
service, fIre and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs,
electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district-
wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of
key urban facilities as described in Attachment 2; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request
for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City supports the applicant's request for expedited Boundary Commission processing.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
NOW THEREFORE BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common C;ouncil of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the
annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary
Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 22, Map 42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700,
including a portion of Oakdale Avenue and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this
Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of
Springfield and approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City Council recomr.nends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed
annexation authorized by QRS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and
adoption of final order required by QRS 199.461.
Section 4: The City Manager shall forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited
processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 5th day of November, 2007 by a vote
of _ for and _ against. .
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 5th day of November, 2007.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Recorder
REVIEWED & APPROVED
I~ FORM
O\""..J ~~
DATE: \~ \~ '1 ,~
LEGAL COUNSEL
ATTACHMENT 1 - 2
EXHIBIT A - P1
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 of Farmdale Subdivision, recorded in Book 27, Page 28, Lane County Oregon
Plat records in Lane Co~ty, Oregon.
RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION
Situated in the City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon, in the northwest quarter of southeast quarter of
Section 22, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian as described as follows:
A portion of the Oakdale Avenue shown on the Farmdale subdivision plat, recorded in Book 27, Page 28
of the Lane County Plat Records in Lane County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Farmdale plat; thence westerly along the
southern right of way of Oakdale -Avenue as described in said plat 255 feet more or less to the most
westerly northwest comer of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Farmdale plat, said comer also being the intersection
of the southern right of way of Oakdale Avenue and the eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard;
thence northerly along said eastern right of way of Pheasant Boulevard, said right of way also being the
western outer boundary of said plat, 100 feet more or less to the most westerly southwest comer of Lot
17, Block 2 of said plat; thence along the northern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 355 feet more or
less to the most easterly southeast comer of Lot 14, Block 2 of said plat; thence crossing said Oakdale
Avenue along the right of way of Game Farm Road to the most easterly northeast comer of Lot 1, Block I
of said plat; thence westerly along the southern right of way of said Oakdale Avenue 93 feet more or less
to the point. of beginning.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 3
EXHIBIT B - Pl
PROPER'TY OWNERS
REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED PROCEDURE
FOR ANNEXATION OR
EArrRATERRlTORIAL WATER OR WASTEWATER LINE EXTENSION
ORS 199.466
I (We), the undersigned property owner(s),.request this ~xation prop~ter l~e ~
~nsion prop~ &astewater line extension proposal) be approved without the study, public
hearing or adoption of a final order required by ORS 199.461. This request is made pursuant to
the provisions ofORS 199.466.
I (We) understand that a study, public hearing and adoption of a final ord~ may be
required if requested by any person or governing body receiving a copy of the executive officer's
analysis and recommendation as required by ORS 199.466.
This request is made in addition to and supplements all other requirements for filing an
annexation petition or tentative plan for an extraterritorial water or wastewater line extension.
Tax Lot _, Township
TaX Lot _, Township
Tax Lot . Township
S, Range _ E1W, Section _, Map _
S, Range _ ElW, Section. , Map _
S, Range _ E1W, Section , Map _
Signature ofPropertv Owner(s) Address
/idf d-r ~~
. Date: s- r _t) I
ATTACHMENT 1 - 4
Informational Attachment
For the proposed annexation of ::l::0.69 acre of property located at 2793 Pheasant Blvd. The area is
described on Lane County Assessor's Map 17-3-22-42, Tax Lots 2500, 2600 and 2700.
Zoning
The Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning of the subject property is consistent with the Metropolitan
Area General Plan. The property meets the minimum requirements for parcel size and frontage on an
east-west street (4,500 square feet and 45 feet of frontage).
Sanitary Sewer
Each lot is undeveloped and is not currently served by sanitary sewer. There is an 8" sanitary line
approximately 160' west of the site within Oakdale Avenue west of Pheasant Boulevard. There is a 24"
sanitary line approximately 250' south of the site. Each lot must connect to the sanitary service prior to
development.
Solid Waste Management
The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits.
Upon annexation, Sanipac will serve this property.
Water Service
The site is currently served by the Rainbow Water District. It will not be served by SUB until July I st of
the year following the annexation.
Electric
SUB (Springfield Utility Board) is currently providing electrical service to the lots.
Fire and Life Safety
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application and has determined that fIre and emergency services are
available to this site. The subject property is within the 4 minute response time of Fire Station #5.
Police Protection
Upon annexation, the area will receive police protection from the City of Springfield. Police protection
and response to priority calls can be provided to this site upon annexation consistent with service
protection throughout the city.
Parks and Recreation Programs
After annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject property will be within the Willamalane Park and
Recreation District boundary. City residents receive park and recreation services from the District. The
District operates two aquatic centers, a Community Center, an Adult Activity Center, and 31 parks
containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. A complete listing ofWillamalane's parks and
programs can be found on-line at www.Willamalane.org, or at 736-4044.
Land Use Controls
The City of Springfield Development Services Department has provided all planning and building
functions for the citizens and property owners of the subject property. The City of Springfield
Development Services Department will continue to provide land use control for the site after the
annexation.
ATTACHMENT 2 - 1
Communication Facilities
Qwest and AT&T currently provide communications in the area for cable service and an array of wireless
companies provide different communication services. The City has no exclusive franchise arrangements
with telecommunication or wireless companies. The field is competitive and therefore guarantees a wide
selection.
Public Schools
Public School services are available through School District 19. Guy Lee Elementary School is
approximately Y<t mile away on Harlow Road. Hamlin Middle School is approximately 1 mile from the
subject property.
Stormwater Control
Any future development or redevelopment on this site will require appropriate stormwater management
techniques in accordance with City standards.
Transportation and Right of Way
The subject property is adjacent to Pheasant Boulevard to the west and Oakdale Avenue to the north. The
portion of Pheasant Boulevard adjacent to tax lot 2700 is a City street. Oakdale Avenue is outside the city
limits (within the UGB) and is a Lane County maintained road.It is functionally classified as an Urban
Local road, having a platted right-of-way width of 60 feet. It has a 24' paved surface with curb and gutter
on both sides of the street, but no sidewalk adjacent to tax lots 2500 and 2600. Sidewalk and street
lighting improvements can be obtained with an improvement agreement during the future land division.
That portion of Oakdale Avenue between Pheasant and Game Farm is included in this annexation. This
includes the entire 60' right of way for a distance of approximately 300' from the intersection with
Pheasant Boulevard to the intersection with Game Farm Rd. After annexation, this section of Oakdale
Ave. will continue to be maintained by Lane County. Annexation of the right of way will allow extension
of services without an extraterritorial agreement and will continue the connectivity of the city street
system.
ATTACHMENT 2- 2
)>
--I
--I
)>
(")
:I:
s::
m
:z:
--I
LRP2007-00018 Evans Annexation
w
-"
N
W*E
_ EvanslBetz
City streets
- Arterial, major
- Arterial, minor
--- UGB
dty limits
Nli~~
as
o
as
Miles
'ii:ii
There are.nowtlFmnDullutaa::ompany this product. .
CJ.sersassumeaD respmsibi/ity jJrany/o~ OI'damagearising
jiom Q'9' error, omissim or positialal inaccuracy of this product
~
ATTACHMENT 3 - 2
LRP2007-00018 Evans Annexation
Oakdale Ave.
'ti
0::
E
...
III
LL
Q)
E
III
(!)
o Area to be annexed
D Tax Lots
Evans/Betz
city limits
.~a
" ~FJ:",,-R'
~a.. .
.Wit"'~ ."" :. '.... . 7Jr.ere.a~.nowarrantJ.uthatarrompmytIriSPrOduct. .
Users assume an respmsibility fr my IoSl 01' tbrrage arising
". , ftom a~ eT1f7, amiss/m Of' ptJfitiauli fntz:CU1'tx:y 0( thi.J pt'OtJlct
ATTACHMENT 3 - 3
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Phone: (541) 726-3759
Fax: (541) 726-3689
SPRINGFIELD
Annexation A~lication
Location of the Property Z 1 q ~ 1>l~~A "5>A~ T ~LV b.
<;?~t4~FlE.LD I Oft.. q 147 1
Assessor's Map(s) and Tax Lot(s) of the property included in the request, (please indicate if only a portion
of a lot is included in the request and attach any additional map and tax lot numbers on a separate sheet of
paper.)
Map# \'-O"!>-'Z.1.,4't Lot# ZS'OC>
Map # \ 1.. O,!>.. 22,. 4't. Lot # 'Z.f.Ol.>
Map # l -'1 ':0 ~ - "l. oz.. 4 Z. Lot # Z. 1 C) (.)
Map #
Lot #
Area of Request "!O, (;> S '-
Square Feet or O. b '1
Acres
Existing Use(s) of the Property S\.JG..lE. FoAM \L, 't:>wE.LLl~(~ ~
O~t.. of T\"\\=- T~~ <-Ole; - TA'f-Lo\ 'Z. 106
Proposed Use(s) of the Property ?LA-CE.Mt;.I'Jr\" O\=. ~\..AJ E.LLt,J~ c; ~ T~"LoTS
'ZSCO ~,.,.,)r> "U.OO. ?p,.~'\'\\'or--1. Af4b At)~l\\~M- "D~&ll...t~ ~ TLZ7(.)O
Applicant Name
MlCJ,..\AEL E..v~<;
\.01 \ ~~Lo~ K..t:>.
'5~~c'nI=-i6-L~ I OK... '\ 14c77 Phone: t"'Z...6>- ~S~~
M lC.~E..L E.v~S \t brE..eAL ~,~e.... 5E.Tl....
,
to, \.~A,~l.....u...,J RD, .
S~,'U~(",F\E-LDI DiZ-41~11 Phone: "1"Z...,.... BS'z..~
Address
Owner Name(s)
Address
Tbe undenigned acknowledges tbat tbe information in tbis application is correct and accurate.
Applicant Signature\M.O~Q,A" 0 ~ [~ Date 1- - z.4.. () 1
If tbe applicant is otber tban tbe owner, tb..e owner bereby grants permission for tbe applicant to act in bis/ber bebalf
OwnerSignab.rre...g~ Q.~. Date If.~'f-07
For Office Use Only:
JoumalNo. eRr 2.m'7- ti3:J(c(S Received By ~
Map No. 11-0.3-22..-4-2- Tax Lot 2.500, zIoO()) ~70()
Date Accepted as Complete . ,
Rcviseo. J.L.IL.n/uu
-2(y'l"?ot>b- OGl.")/tl-- U~ L. Anyt-exrJ,~~
.J A TT ACHMtNT . '4' '- ,
ANNEXATION NARRATIVE
PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED
LOCATION:
2793 Pheasant Blvd.
ASSESSOR'S MAP:
TAX LOTS:
17-03-22.42
2500 - 9,583 Square Feet
2600 - 9,583 Squar~ Feet
2700 - 10, 890 Square Feet
30,056 Square Feet = 0.69 Acre
TOTAL AREA:
COMP PLAN & ZONING DESIGNATION
Low Density Residential- LDR/UF-I0
SITE DESCRIPTION
Tax lots 2500 and 2600 are vacant parcels created as Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 Farrndale Subdivision.
Tax lot 2700 contains a two story single-family dwelling that is served by a subsurface sewage
disposal system located on the parcel. It was created as lot 4, Block 1, Farrndale Subdivision.
Electric, telephone, television, Rainbow Water and Northwest Natural Gas facilities are located
along the West side of tax lot 2700, and the North side of tax lots 2500, 2600 and 2700. Utility
service connections exist upon each parcel.
The property is level with an elevation of approximately 439 feet MSL except the most Northerly
and Westerly 10 feet, which slopes down approximately 1 Yz feet to the top of curb.
Tax lots 2500 and 2600 and the South 50 feet of 2700 consists of a grass cover with a few small
scattered trees along the back and side boundaries. The North portion of tax lot 2700 contains a
dwelling and typical residential yard, shrub and tree landscaping.
The property does not contain any special site features and is within floodplain zone X - above
the 500 year flood.
PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION
Without annexation one additional dwelling might be possible on tax lot 2600 with a supporting
subsurface sewage disposal system on tax lot 2500.
. Annexation will allow the extension of public sewer to serve the individual parcels which
otherwise have all utilities and services available that are necessary to allow residential
development.
The annexation will allow the construction of single-family dwellings on tax lots 2500 and 2600,
and an additional dwelling (after partitioning) on tax lot 2700. .
ATTACHMENT 4 - 2
FORM #1
PETITION
ANNEXATION TO THE .CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
TO: LANE COUNTY L6cAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
We, the undersigned, constitute the owners of at least one-half of the land area of the property described in the
attachment marked "Exhibit A" AND
We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map is attached marked "Exhibit B," showing the
affected territory and its relationship to the present city limit boundaries.
The annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under the Boundary Commissio~ Act and should therefore
be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study, a Final Order should be entered by the Boundary
Commission.
By \N\ ~ ~V':.\) ~ f~
,
.
By..&a1duu . ll. ~
Date ~-'Z.~-01
Date 4 ..t.~ - 01
By Date
By Date
MAP# \' - . 0 ~- "l. 't.. 4"L LOT# Z.Soc\ 't. '-00\ 't.. lOb
MAP# LOT#
With the above signature, I am verifying that I have the authority to consent
to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my fIrm, agency or trust. .
Revised 12/28/00
5
ATTACHMENT 4 - 3
PETITION REQUIREMENTS
FOR VALIDATION OF SIGNATURES
FOR ANNEXATIONS TO DISTRICTS
OR FORMATION OF DISTRICT
(1-8-2002)
. Petition sheet must include: (see attached example)
. Signature
. Printed name
· Residential address/city
· Associated map & tax lot #
. Whether land owner (if it will b~ utilize<;l for Assessment & Taxation also), registered voter, or both
. Date of Signature
. Completed petitions must be submitted as a group.
. Completed petitions must include a complete list of all affected map & tax lots in number order.
Once petition signatures are submitted, Lane County Elections will:
· Determine the total valid registered voters for the affected area.
· Validate the number of valid signatures of registered voters. . .
· Certify the percentage of valid signatures to the total valid registered voters for the affected area.
I:\CDCaELEC\FRM\annex formation PETITIONS REQUIREMENTS. doc
Revised 12128/00
8
ATTACHMENT 4 - 4
INFORMATION SHEET
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
NORTH PLAZA LEVEL, PSB
99 E. Broadway, Suite 400
Eugene, Oregon 97401
PHONE: 681-4425
M\L101rA-;..L if? E.v~ ~
(Petitioner's Name)
S~u....,,~ c=.t€-LC I Oi-
(City)
tOl (
l~~.R~..
(Address)
q 14 7 '1
(Zip)
l'Z..'''BS'z. S
(Phone)
The attached petition is for (annexation to) liM" ~witllllFlW'al frglR~ the
$ pcz..n-\ Gt f I CJ..r> (City) or
(District)
PLEASE SUPPLY THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING THE AREA TO BE ANNEXED
OR WITHDRAWN.
Estimated Population (at present): C~ I:'
Number of Existing Residential Units: 0 N. E..
Land Area:
D. " ~
Acres or
Square Miles
Is the area within a Domestic Water Supply District? '( I;. ~
RA\M1S6~
WAre'i:. 1:) ~ <;. ~\c:... T'
(Name)
Is the area with a Rural Fire Protection District? N C
(Name)
ANNEXATION TO CITIES OR WATER DISTRICTS ONLY
A. If the property is entirely or substantially undeveloped, what are the plans for future development? (Be
specific-if site or development plans have been prepared, please submit a copy)
, ,
CoI4 ~ \"tl...vc~ ~'-J..1.E..\.LI....(C., S ON TA-"tlc>~ z.Soc" ~bOO
\ ( .
"PA\2.. '\ \. 't'~ uN.. Cf:. ~ ~rlU>c.\ A~ A-bt>\ 't\ o,.J,~ ~~ EL<"'/ ,c..,( (.,
\ .
o....l T~+Ll:>r L 1 C ()
B. Can the proposed development be achieved under current county zoning?
Yes No X .
If no, has a zone change been sought from the county either formally or informally forthe property under
. consideration? Yes_ No~.
Revised 12/28/00
11
ATTACHMENT 4 - 5
Please describe outcome of zone change request if answer to the proceeding question is "Yes."
ALL PROPOSALS
A. Does this proposal include all contiguous property under the same ownership? 'if.. ~
----'-- If not, are you in the process of a major_or minor _ partition?
. ~o) .
If you are not in the process of a subdivision, please state your reasons for not including entire ownership.
B. ORS 199.462 of the Boundary Commission Act states: "When receiving a boundary change, a boundary
commission shall consider economic, demographic and sociological projections pertinent to the proposal, and
past and prospective physical developments ofland that would directly or indirectly be affected by the proposed
boundary change." Considering these points, please provide the reasons the proposed boundary chanl!e
should be made. Please be very specific. Attach additional page if necessary.
'T\~ c_ 'P Cl...:> PE.JZ... "'l ~ e...c..t ~v E.. ~ ALL u ft.13A+-l t;. ~R.\Jl c..1!. <;
rJE..C.E..SSAtt.'( Fo~ Ce..'-'~Lc..:>PM~ '\ ~c;t<;' iE,N'\ ~n",-, T1~::...
6,)M~S(ue.. ?lA+-\ OE..S\G7~A.\t~~ (['E.C;l~e.....rl"IAL) U~~
A~E..'f-.A-\"\"N.. Pu[!)Llc.. ~Ptf.-Jt 'rA-Q..-; SE.wElL Mu<;r ."S.E-
E:. 't "t'6.H t>e. b A-~~ ~ ( M~ 'r e..L"( 9 C,) F-E.e. '\ 'l"C l\'\€. <; \ \E.. ,
C. Names of Persons to Whom Staff Notes and Notices Shall be Sent
M\C.~~E..'- ? Ev~C;
~ame)
l 01 \ t-\'At:..L~ \<.. t:>,
(Address)
~?~JLi6t F-1E..u::>, OlL q 1~ 11
(City) (Zip)
(Name)
(Address)
(City)
(Zip)
~ame)
(Name)
(Address)
(Address)
(City)
(Zip)
(City)
(Zip)
Revised 12/28/00
12 .
ATTACHMENT 4 - 6
E
Q
ON
ORS 199.466
. I rNe), the undersigned property owner(s),request this (annexation proposal) (water line
extension proposal) (wastewater line extension proposal) be approved without the study, public
hearing or adoption of a final order required by ORS 199.461. This request is made pursuant to
the provisions ofORS 199.466.
I rNe) understand that a study, public hearing and adoption of a final order may be
required if requested by any person or governing body receiving a copy of the executive officer's
analysis and recommendation as required, by ORS 199.466.
This request is made in addition to and supplements all other requirements for :filing an
annexation petition or tentative plan for an extraterritorial water or wastewater line extension.
2700 \ '(. ('f$' ;2'Z..4'Z. ,
TaX Lot _:.':", Township ~ S, Range::.....~ 1_ 1::.1 VV, Section ~- .. ~, Map i. "1-03 - ~'Z..,-zA
TaX Lot""Z5l:Y\ Township -L1- S, Range.Q2.- E/W, Se~tionZ'ZA1', Map L1-~- z..~ z..4
. ,Tax Lot~'o, Township -1l- S, Range Q3... E/W, Section ZZ.itz., Map ~ ~ :s-ar z.4-
Simature ofPropeIty Owner(s) Address '
#..\A.A.~-~JL.. ,...Q. -t 7" ~ lOO-t l \*~O'v{ f3.~ ~ft.b q-zt '(7
Date:
ATTACHMENT 4 - 7
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
\\.;\TER SER\'ICE CENTER 202 South 18th Street Springfield, OR 97477-5240 Tel 541.726.2396 Fax 541.747.7348 www,subutil.com
May 21,2007
Steve Hopkins
City of Springfield
225 N. 5th Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Dear Steve:
SUBJECT:
ANNEXATION #LRP2007-00018 EV ANS/LAND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
17-03-22-42 TL 2500,2600,2700 2793 PHEASANT BLVD
Listed below are our comments for the above referenced development proposal:
1. The Springfield Utility Board Water Division has no objection to the proposed annexation.
2. The proposed development is currently within the service territory of the Rainbow Water District
and will be served by RWD until the [lIst day of the July following annexation to the City of
Springfield, at which time SUB will become the water service provider. .
Sincerely,
G ~ VVlc...J~
Bart E. McKee, P .E.
Senior Civil Engineer - Water Division
BEM:mkm
cc: Mike Evans, Land Planning Consultants, 1071 Harlow Rd, Springfield OR 97477
S:\SITEPLAN\2793 Pheasant Blvd annexation 5-21-07.docxx:
ATTACHMENT 4 - 8
Page 1 of 1
HOPKINS Steve
From: GORDON Gilbert
Sent: Friday, May 25, 20071:13 PM
To: HOPKINS Steve
Cc: GERARD Alan; FECHTEL Melissa
Subject: Annexation LRP2007-00018 Mike Evans/Land Planning Consultants
Steve,
This lot can be served by Fire Department services. Access and water supply are already pre-
existing via public roads and a fire hydrant provided by Rainbow Water District. The proposed
annexation site is right next door to Fire Station 5.
Gilbert R. Gordon
Deputy Fire Marshal
Springfield Fire and Life Safety
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Phone: 541-726-2293
E-Mail: ggordon@ci.springfield.or.us
9/26/2007
ATTACHMENT 4 - 9
Page 1 of3
HOPKINS Steve
From: KWOCK Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, September 26,20073:10 PM
To: HOPKINS Steve
Cc: MCKENNEY Gary; BENOY Leslie
Subject: RE: LRP2007-00018: EvanslBetz Annexation
Steve,
Based on our conversation just now:
It seems to make some sense that the City goes forth and annexs the portion of Oakdale Street directly in front of
the subject properties...or at the very least, annex that portion that would allow sidewalk connectivity. PW
Transportation would support annexation of the entire roadway though.
Saying that, it would be the City Engineer that has the final decision on this, working though Les Benoy. They
may have other issues that we are not aware of.
At any rate, some reason for/against annexing:
For
* Pheasant Blvd, to the west, is within the City limits. Annexing Oakdale Avenue would continue the connectivity
of the City street system, especially in the event that * .
* Game Farm Road becomes a future city facility.
* The sidewalk system extends in front of the first parcel to the west. The next two parcels are empty lots and
does not have sidewalk on its frontage. The sidewalk then picks up just to the east of the subject parcels.
Annexing at least that portion of the roadway would allow construction and connectivity of the sidewalk system. If
we did not annex, then we would at least want to get an IA for the sidewalk, even though we'd be foregoing a
sidewalk facility now. (By the way, we'd want to get an IA for street lights whatever happens.)
* Without annexing the street portion, the residents could run into the issue of who supplies emergency services.
Against
Maintenance for the roadway would not be a City responsibility.
The road is not "fully" developed according to City code...as there are no street lights along.this portion of the
roadway.
Again, there may be other reasons for annexing or not from PW Engineering's perspective.
The picture below shows the 3 properties of concern highlighted.
Greg K.
X7134
9/26/2007
ATTACHMENT 4 -10
HOPKINS Steve
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
FIELDS Phil [PhiI.Fields@co.lane.or.us]
Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:41 PM
HOPKINS Steve
LEMHOUSE Brad; PETSCH John S; BAJRACHARY A Shashi; BARRY Celia
LRP2007-00018 (Evans/Land Planning Consultants) (Pheasant Blvd. & Oakdale Ave.)
TP File No.:
Spfld. No.:
Applicant:
Location:
TRS:
Tax Lots:
9036
LRP2007 -00018
Mike Evans/Land Planning Consultants
2793 Pheasant Blvd., Springfield
17-03-22-42
2500,2600,2700
Proposal:
Annexation
Comments from Lane County Transportation Planning:
This proposal is adjacent to two roads, namely, Pheasant Boulevard to the west, and Oakdale Avenue to the north.
The portion of Pheasant Boulevard adjacent to TL 2700 is a City street.
Oakdale Avenue is a Lane County maintained road (LCR) within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. It is functionally
classified as an Urban Local road, having a platted right-of-way width of 60 feet. It has a 24' paved surface with curbs and
gutters, but no sidewalk adjacent to TLs 2500 and 2600.
Driveway spacing for this road is 20 feet [LC 15.138(2)]. A facility permit is required for each new access.
LANE COUNTY FACILITY PERMIT
A Facility Permit shall be required for placement of facilities within the right-of-way of Oakdale Avenue. Facilities and
development includes, but is not limited to, road improvements, sidewalks, new or reconstructed driveway or road
approach intersections, utility placements, excavation, clearing, grading, culvert placement or replacement, storm water
facilities, or any other facility, thing, or appurtenance [LC 15.205(1)].
Please contact 541-682-6902 or visit http://www.lanecountv.ora/RiahtOfWav/default.htm#forms for information about
facility permits.
Phil Fields
Lane County Transportation Planning
3040 N. Delta Hwy.
Eugene, OR 97408-1696
541-682-6976
phi I. fields@co.lane.or.us
i) e-~d . t b-b.) ,tlfh..r) ~ I~~ I ~ 1
1
ATTACHMENT 4 -11