HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Building 1996-10-21
SP~'NGF'ELD ,. ~
" " " . , , , , ',7.--.'
ffiL~. .'..... .....,\,';".~{El;I~ () ~.~LA!D.I
~~~
Page 1
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Job Number: 961255
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING SAFETY
225 North Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Office: 726-3759
Inspection Line: 726-3769
Location of Proposed Work: 1570 S A ST
Assessors Map #: 17033632
Tax Lot #: 06601
Owner: FARNEY/PATTY EDWARDS
Address: 1570 SOUTH A STREET
Phone #:
City/State/Zip: SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
Description Of Work: TRUCK SHOP ADDITION
ADDITION Value:
0.00
Contractor
Canst.
Contractor #
Expires
Phone
General:
MCLEAN MASONRY 0063200
PO Box 766 Springfield OR 974770000
02/14/97
746-5595
HANDICAP ACCESS: Y
-- OFFICE USE
QUAD AREA: 2CSW
LAND USE: 5300
Item
Sq. Ftg Main
REMODEL 1152 SQ. FT.
Square Feet
2304
x
$/Sguare Feet
Value
75,000.00
0.00
TOTAL VALUE OF PROJECT
75,000.00
Plan Check Fee:
232.70 Rec #: 23194 Date: 09/16/96 Rec By: LORNE PLEGER
BUILDING
Surcharge/Admin
MECHANICAL
Surcharge/Admin
PLUMBING
Surcharge/Admin
358.00
28.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SUBTOTAL PERMITS
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
386.64
2,765.65
TOTAL PERMIT FEES EXCLUDING ELECTRICAL
3,152.29
.",..s,pn:NGF..,.K:.E...L....D~ . .... . . .
~ .~.C!1..rt.J/J{q)j:I~/::t 0 P)j~ "I
. .~~
Job Number: 961255
Page 2
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
It is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that all inspections are
made at the proper time. To request an inspection, call 726-3769
(recorder), state your City designated job number, job address, type of
inspection requested and when you will be ready for inspection. Requests
received before 7:00 a.m. will be made the same working day, requests made after
7:00 a.m will be made the following work day.
Special Inspections: In accordance with
a special inspector shall be employed by
construction of any following "*" work.
shall be furnished to Building Safety.
Section 306 of the State Specialty Code
the Owner/Contractor during
A copy of the special testing reports
In addition to the inspections specified, the Building Official may make or
require other inspections of any construction work to ensure compliance with
the Building, City or Development Code.
FOOTING - After trenches are excavated.
SLAB - To be made after all inslab building service equipment, conduit
piping, and other equipment items are in place but prior to concrete
STRUCTURAL MASONRY - To be done during constr by State Certified
Special Inspector. Provide results to City Building Inspector.
ROUGH ELECTRICAL - Prior to cover.
FRAMING - Prior to cover.
INSULATION - Floor; prior to decking Wall/Ceiling; Prior to cover
FINAL ELECTRICAL - When all electrical work is complete.
FINAL FIRE - When all Fire Department requirements have been met.
been met.
FINAL SITE PLAN - After all requirements have been met for Minimum
Developme~t Standards or from the Development Agreement.
FINAL BUILDING - When all required inspections have been approved and
the building is complete.
--- ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
REFERRED TO JULIA POWELL FOR ANY MINIMUM
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
SUBJECT TO MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REVIEW BY JULIA POWELL
Plans Reviewed By: LORNE PLEGER
Building Site Reviewed By: LISA HOPPER
Date: 10/15/96
By signature, I state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed
application and do hereby certify that all information hereon is true and
correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shall be done
in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Springfield, and the Laws
of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that
NO OCCUPANCY will be made of any structure without permission of the
Community Services Division, Building Safety. I further certify that only
contractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.055 will be
used on this. project.
I further agree to ensure that all required inspections are requested at the
proper time, that project address is readaple from the street, that the
permit car is located at the front of the property, and the approved set
of p 1~;Z: site at all times during constr/;O~;:J/_ f C
Date
Job Number: 961255
Receipt Number:
Date Paid:
Amount Received:
Received By:
'l!!J?'~~'1
- -- VALIDATION
?3~5'-/
/ttl -;U -'9?;
-;;1,/5'.2. :::<<7
a/~
. ,/Y
Page 3
H,.S~_. C!iJuIJ'~~3.!,!.h'(E][f.:t''?1J!/'J
, ...~~.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
(COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL)
Name or Company: FARNEY/PATTY EDWARDS
Location: 1570 S A ST
Developement Type: C Building Size:
1. STORM DRAINAGE
Impervious Sq Ft 1.0 X 2560
2. SANITARY SEWER
Number Of PFUs
(see Page 2)
- CITY
1.0 X 0
3. TRANSPORTATJ:ON
Number Of Units
1.0 X 1.150 X
1.0 1.150 X
Trip
3.270
0.740
X
Rate
X
Transportation Total
4. SANJ:TARY SEWER - MWMC
Number Of PFUs
o
Job No.: 961255
Lot Size:
X
Per Sq Ft =
0.216
X
44.75
Per PFU
X
Cost Per
451.26
451.26
Trip
$1,696.96
$384.02
X
X
Per PFU + MWMC Admin Fee
20.690
MWMC CREDIT If Applicable (see Page 2)
TOTAL - MWMC SDC
SUBTOTAL - (Add J:tems 1, 2, 3 & 4)
5. ADMJ:NJ:STRATIVE FEES
Base Charge (Subtotal Above) X
0.50
TOTAL SDC
Reviewed By: TROY MCALLISTER
Date: 09/19/96
Page 1
Sq Ft
$552.96
$0.00
$2,080.99
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,633.95
$131.70
$2,765.64
SPRINGFIELD,,, . .
l>~... :^~.'.~' .{q 1/ rL/J!!l;/~iH{I/A VIr/ill =i /J pJ;;~1
"~
Job Number: 961255
FIXTURE UNIT CALCULATION TABLE
Page 2
Fixture Type
Bathtub
Drinking Fountain
Floor Drain
Interceptors For Grease/Oil/Solids/Etc
Inteceptors For Sand/Auto Wash/Etc
Laundry Tub/Clotheswasher
Clotheswasher - 3 Or More
Receptor For Refrigerator/water Station/Etc
Receptor for Commercial Sink/Dishwasher/Etc
Shower, Single Stall
Shower, Gang
Sink, Bar, Commercial, Residential Kitchen
Urinal, Stall/Wall
Wash Basin/Lavatory, Single
Water Closet, Public Installation
Water Closet, Private
Miscellaneous
Number of
New Fixture
Unit
Equivalent
Fixture
Units
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS 0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
2
1
2
3
6
2
6
1
3
2
2
2
1
6
4
CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: Based on assessed value. If improvements occured
after annexation date, credits are calculated separately.
(calculations are by $1000)
Year Annexed:
Credit For Parcel Or Land Only If Applicable:
Improvement (if after annexation date) :
o
x
0.00
0,00
0.00
$0.00
(If land value is multiplied by 1 then the parcel/land credit is not accurate.)
o
x
0.00
CREDIT TOTAL =
.
.'
SPRINGFIELD
BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF DECISION
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
(541) 726,3753
FAX (541) 726,3689
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
APPLICANT: C & E Rentals and Sales
DA TE: July 9, 1996
ADDRESS: 1570 South A Street. Springfield. Oregon
CASE NO: 96-07-104
V A RII'N CE REQUEST: The applicant requested a variance from Section 9-7-14 (2) of the Springfield
Sign Code relative to the allow.able number of freestanding signs in a Community Commercial distr:ict.
At the Board of Appeals Meeting held on July 9, 1996 The Board of Appeals rendered the following
decision regarding the above referenced variance request: . .
XX'
APPROVED
, DENIED
, ' With Conditions
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1) 'The existing wall sign above the showroom will be removed:
2) The Board determined that there are unusual conditions associated with the property, i.e., two
main entrances to the property from two different streets.
3) Thcre are no other practical alternatives to sign the property for ideniification purposes.
4) The Board determined.that the applicants interpretation of tile definition of development area
was correct in this situation.
d-dJ d
Butch Baird. Chair
Board of Appeals
w
.~
.
'510
A .m-.
CITY OF SPRJNGFIELD
BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS
MINUTES
Springfield City Hall
225 Fifth Street
Library Meeting Room
Tuesday
July 9, 1996
I 1:0.0 a.m.
l.
RollCall:
Present were Butch Baird, Chairperson; Jim Ingram, Orville Tharp, and Tom
Miller. Ainslie Krans was absent.
Staff:
Dave Puent, Lisa Hopper. Secretary to the Board
2. Orville Tharp moved to approve the minutes of the April 22, 1996 Board of Appeals Meeting.
Jim Ingram seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
3. New Business:
Chairperson Baird asked the Board to declare any conflicts of interests prior to the hearing. No
conflicts were stated.
n (htewnv M.aJ.1 Partners. Qtl-07..:..l..O..1
111e property in question is located at 3000 Gateway Street. Springfield. Oregon.
11le applicant requests a var.iance from Section 9-7-14 (2) of the Springfield Sign Code relative to
the placement of a freestanding sign on an undeveloped parcel in a Community Commercial zone.
Lisa Hopper presented the staff report to the Board saying that tile applicant is proposing to install
a freestanding sign on the last vacant pad site on tile Gateway Mall property. 111e proposed sign
meets all size and hcight requirements. but the Code prohibits the placement of a sign on an
undeveloped parcel of property. Ms. Hopper stated the Mall Partnership is requesting an
agreement with the City of Springfield to install the allowable freestanding sign for the vacant pad
site at this time with the understanding that once the pad site is improved, an additional
freestanding sign would not be allowed, Ms. Hopper also said that the applicant is also agreeable
to the removal of the mall entrance monument sign on the south east entrance to tile property in
order to obtain a variance to place this requested freestanding sign.
Ms, Hopper added that staff supports the applicants request due to the unusual visual conditions
associated witil the property relating to tile placement of the new retail structure on the south west
comer of the Mall property. She said that vehicles traveling south on Gateway Street will be
unable to locate the new structure because of the height and location of the existing structures and
landscaping located on the property.
Chairperson Baird asked for clarification why this request needed to be presented to the Board.
Ms. Hopper said that the Code does not allow staff to issue permits on undeveloped parcels.
.
.
Board of Appeals
Minutes
July 9, 1996
Page 3
,'interpretation of the definition is an area which is improved as one development area. Ms. Hopper
said there are a number of developments in the City that incorporate two or more tax lots and each
of those development areas have been allowed signage for one development area as it applies to
their specific sign district.
Ms. Hopper said that staff could find no unusual conditions associated with the property and that
there were other alternatives for identification of the business. wall signage for example, Ms.
Hopper said that staff recommends denial of the request.
Stephanie Castle of Eugene Sign and Awning represented the applicant. Ms. Castle said that by
reading the definition of development area in the Sign Code, they felt they were Clltitled to two
freestanding signs since the business docs span two tax lots. She added that the existing signage
does not exceed the allowable signage for that district. Ms. Castle added that directional signs as
allowed by the Sign Code would not meet their needs because of the maximum size and height
limitations.
Scott Bocci of C & E Rentals and Sales was also present to offer additional information to the
Board. Mr. Bocci said that the current wall signage on the building is visible only during certain
times of the year. During the Spring and Summer, the street trees which have been planted along
South A Street block the wall signage to oncoming traffic. Mr. Bocci expressed concern to the
Board of his difficulties he has encountered during his recent improvement of his business and felt
frustrated that the sign he wishes to install would not be approved by staff but had to be presented
to the Board.
Buzz Blumm, also representing Eugene Sign and Awning. added that the proposed location of the
additional freestanding sign would only be seen from South A Street and will not be visible from
where their other freestanding sign is located on Main Street.
Mr. Bocci said that the property previously had a freestanding sign and ifhe would not have
removed it he could have changed the copy of the sign and maintained two freestanding signs for
. his business.
Chairperson Baird closed the public hearing.
Tom Miiler said that he felt the definition in the Sign Code was clear and the applicant is entitled
to an additional freestanding sign. Dave Puent said that when a development area incorporates
two or more tax lots, the property owner nonnally consolidates the tax lots into one. In this case,
the lot consolidation was not made.
Chairperson Baird said he agrees with Mr. Miller and that with the property having two major
entrances, one from Main Street and one from South A Street. the property docs need additional
sign age on South A Street.
Mr. Ingram asked Mr. Bocci to specit)> the location of the proposed sign. Mr, Bocci said that the
sign will be placed in the south east comer of the tax lot. meeting all minimum setbacks as
required by tile City.
Chairperson Baird asked Mr. Bocci if this variance was approved would they be willing to remove
an existing wall sign. Mr. Bocci said that the sign above the showroom would be removed.
.
.
Board of Appeals
Minutes
July 9. 1996
Page 4
Mr. Ingram suggested the sign he located on the comer of 15th and South A Street to avoid the
sign from being blocked by the man lifts and the trees, Mr. Bocci said that if the sign were to be
placed on the corner, the Joey's Pizza sign would block the view of the sign. Mr. Bocci added
that if the variance is approved. he will not allow the rental equipment on the property to block the
new freestanding sign.
Mr. Miller moved to approve the variance as requested, Mr. Tharp seconded the motion. The
motion passed unanimously.
3. Business from the Board:
4, Business from the Staff:
None.
a. Change in ~ivision Responsibilities. Mr. Puent announced to the Board that the Building
Safety Section of the Community Services ~ivision has gone through a small reorganization. He
said that Lisa Hopper has recently received a promotion and will be overseeing the penn it and
inspection services for the Division.
b. Annual Contractor Meeting. Me. Puent said that although the tumout was small, the annual
meeting was very infonnative. The contractors made very good suggestions on improving some
of our policies and fonns. He added that the suggestions made will be implemented by January I,
1997. Chairperson Baird suggested that two annual contractor meetings be held, one for
residential contractors and one for commercial/industrial contractors. Mr. Puent said that if in the
future we can obtain a larger attendance to these meetings, dividing the meetings into the two
types of construction would be very beneficial to both those in attendance and staff.
c, Sign Code Update. Ms. Hopper told thc Board that she will be having a meeting for interested
sign contractors on July 23rd at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the proposed changes to the Sign Code and
invited the Board to attend.
5. Business from the Audience:
None.
6. The meeting was adjourned at I :25 p.m.
.
.
Board of Appeals
'Minutes
July 9, 1996
Page 2
Barry O'Connor and Richard Atkinson were present to represent the applicant. Mr. O'Connor
reaffinned Ms. Hoppers comments relative to the agreement the Mall Partnership would like to
enter into with the City of Springfield for the "exchange" of one freestanding sign for another. He
added that in addition to not allowing an additional freestanding sign for the business who will be
locating on the pad site, the Mall Partnership will also remove the entrance monument sign.as
stated earlier by Ms, Hopper.
Mr. O'Connor said that the new retail store which is under construction at this time has visibility
from 1-5, but there is no visibility from the entrance on Gateway Street. He added that the
proposed sign will be 20 feet high and meet all required setbacks.
Chairperson Baird closed the public hearing.
Mr. Ingram reaffirmed with Mr. Atkinson that the existing monument sign will be removed if this
variance is approved. Mr. Atkinson said that was correct.
Mr. Tharp moved to approve the applicants request. Mr. Ingram seeonded the motion.
Chairperson Baird asked Mr. O'Connor if directions to the site will be placed on the proposed
sign. Mr. O'Connor said there will be no direction given on the proposed sign, however. the Mall
Partnership is working on directories to be placed on the mall property. Mr. Atkinson added that
once a customer has turned off Gateway Street onto the mall property, the retail store will be
visible.
Chairperson Baird called for the vote. The motion passed by a vote of 3 to I with Chairperson
Baird voting in opposition.
Mr. Atkinson asked the Board if they would discuss the possibility ofa change to a previous
variance approval from the Board for a four foot sign band at the Gateway Mall. Mr. Atkinson
said that the Emporium wishes to place a sign within the approved four foot band. but the "E" in
Emporium is six feet tall. Chairperson Baird said that any request to the Board needs to be
advertised as a public hearing and the Board could not discuss the request at this meeting.
h r & E Renlal~ ;mrl S(lh~~ Qii-07..:..l..(M
TIle property is located a~ 1570 South A Street} The applicant is requesting a variance from
Section 9-7-14 (2) of the Springfield Sign Code relative to the number of allowable freestanding
signs.
Lisa Hopper presented the staff report to the Board saying that the property is located in a
Community Commercial zone which allows one freestanding sign. At this time. the development
area has one freestanding sign placed on the Main Street side of their property. She added that
staffs opinion is that C & E Rentals and Sales eurrent wall signage is visible for customer
identification from South A Street.
Ms. Hopper explained that although the definition of a development area in the Sign Code does
identify a development area as a development that is contained within a single tax lot, staffs