HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03 Transportation Systems Development Charge (SDC) Methodology Update AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 6/16/2014
Meeting Type: Work Session Staff Contact/Dept.: Ken Vogeney-DPW
Staff Phone No: 736-1026
Estimated Time: 20 minutes S P R I N G F I E L D
C I T Y C O U N C I L
Council Goals: Maintain and Improve
Infrastructure and Facilities
ITEM TITLE: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDC) METHODOLOGY UPDATE
ACTION REQUESTED:
Direct staff to schedule a public hearing on the Transportation SDC methodology using Option A and provide the 90-day notice to Interested Parties that the
methodology is available for review pursuant to ORS 223-304(7)(a).
ISSUE STATEMENT: Based on Council direction from the May 19, 2014 work session, staff presents two Transportation SDC rate scenarios using different approaches for allocating
bicycle/pedestrian project costs to growth. Upon Council’s direction, the
preliminary SDC methodology will be updated with Council’s preferred approach and staff will issue the statutorily required public notices announcing the
availability of the methodology for review and comment. A public hearing will be
scheduled at least 90 days following the public notice.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Briefing Memo
2. Memo from Deb Galardi of Galardi Rothstein Group regarding preliminary Transportation System Development Charges
3. Transportation System Project List
4. Level of Service analysis graphic
DISCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT:
City staff is in the process of updating the System Development Charge
methodology for the Transportation System. Transportation SDCs were last reviewed and updated by Council in 2008. The Council adopted the city’s new Transportation System Plan (TSP) on March 11, 2014. The projects from the TSP
that are expected to be built within the next twenty years form the new project list that is used in the SDC methodology as part of the process to set SDC fee levels.
Per Council direction at the May 19, 2014 work session, the recommendations from the Citizen’s Advisory Committee have been incorporated into the proposed methodology along with the Council’s direction to assume 70% of roadway project costs will come from external funding. Staff has prepared two rate
calculations based on the two bicycle/pedestrian approaches. Option A is derived from the “Level of Service” approach. Option B continues the City’s current practice and is derived from the assumption that
growth will pay for 20% of all bicycle/pedestrian projects based upon the overall growth in vehicle trips.
The Transportation SDC is comprised of two components: the Reimbursement Fee and the Improvement
Fee. The updated Reimbursement Fee (growth’s share of the replacement cost of current arterial/collector
system less external funding and bond principal) is calculated to be $16.14 per trip end, which is a decrease from the current Reimbursement Fee. The updated Improvement Fee (cost of future projects attributable to
growth) is calculated to be $331.55 per trip end using bicycle/pedestrian Option A or $309.45 per trip end using bicycle/pedestrian Option B. Both options are an increase from the current improvement fee.
The overall Transportation SDC calculated with the updated methodology and new Transportation System
Project List is $347.69 per trip end using Option A or $325.58 per trip end using Option B. This is an increase over the current SDC of $86.39 per trip end for Option A or $64.28 per trip end for Option B. The
difference between the two bicycle/pedestrian approaches is approximately $22 per trip end.
M E M O R A N D U M City of Springfield
Date: 6/16/2014
To: Gino Grimaldi COUNCIL
From: Len Goodwin, Director DPW
Ken Vogeney, City Engineer DPW
BRIEFING
Subject: Transportation Systems Development Charge (SDC) Methodology Update MEMORANDUM
ISSUE: Based on Council direction from the May 19, 2014 work session, staff presents two
Transportation SDC rate scenarios using different approaches for allocating bicycle/pedestrian project costs to growth. Upon Council’s direction, the preliminary SDC methodology will be
updated with Council’s preferred approach and staff will issue the statutorily required public notices announcing the availability of the methodology for review and comment. A public hearing will be scheduled at least 90 days following the public notice.
COUNCIL GOALS/MANDATE:Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
BACKGROUND:
City staff is in the process of updating the System Development Charge methodology for the
Transportation System. Transportation SDCs were last reviewed and updated by Council in 2008. The Council adopted the city’s new Transportation System Plan (TSP) on March 11, 2014. The projects from the TSP that are expected to be built within the next twenty years
(2035) form the new project list that is used in the Transportation SDC methodology as part of the process to set SDC fee levels.
Per Council direction at the May 19, 2014 work session, the recommendations from the Citizen’s Advisory Committee have been incorporated into the proposed methodology along
with the Council’s direction to assume 70% of roadway project costs will come from external
funding. Staff has prepared two rate calculations based on the two bicycle/pedestrian approaches. Option A is derived from the “Level of Service” approach. Option B continues the
City’s current practice and is derived from the assumption that growth will pay for 20% of all bicycle/pedestrian projects based upon the overall growth in vehicle trips.
When evaluating options for inclusion in the methodology, Council and staff use the following objective evaluation criteria:
• Equity – is the fee in proportion to the system impact?
• Defensibility – is the methodology consistent with the law and other communities?
• Administrative Feasibility – is the data available to support the methodology?
• Public Understanding/Acceptance – is the methodology simple to understand and fair?
It is also appropriate to consider consistency with other City policies/methodologies where applicable.
DISCUSSION
The Transportation SDC is comprised of two components: the Reimbursement Fee and the Improvement Fee. The updated Reimbursement Fee (growth’s share of the replacement cost of
current arterial/collector system less external funding and bond principal) is calculated to be
$16.14 per trip end which is a decrease from the current Reimbursement Fee of $56.26 per trip end. The updated Improvement Fee (cost of future projects attributable to growth) is calculated
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 4
MEMORANDUM 6/12/2014 Page 2
to be $331.55 per trip end using Option A (the “Level of Service” approach for bicycle/pedestrian projects) or $309.45 per trip end using Option B (use 20% growth in auto
trips as same basis for bicycle/pedestrian projects). Both options result in an increase from the
current improvement fee which is $205.04 per trip end with Option A being slightly higher than Option B by approximately $22.
The breakdowns of the proposed Options are detailed below with further discussion of the calculations included in Attachment 2.
Reimbursement SDC
Component External % Replacement $
Net Project Cost $26,566,752
X Available Capacity Cost 11.7% $3,108,310
X Local Growth Cost 83.6% $2,598,370
Divided by Growth Trip Ends 161,016
SDC per Trip End $16.14
Improvement Fee Options ($/Trip End)
Component Option
A
Option B
Roadway Projects $171.42 $171.42
Intersections $31.52 $31.52
Bicycle/Pedestrian (Combined) $17.95 $5.98
Bicycle Only $0.10 $0.55
Multi-Use Paths $15.28 $8.30
Pedestrian – Sidewalks $4.49 $0.88
Pedestrian - Crossing $7.44 $7.44
Other Projects $4.28 $4.28
State Facilities $79.07 $79.07
Total SDC per Trip End $331.55 $309.45
Summary of Options
Component Option A Option B
Reimbursement $16.14 $16.14
Improvement $331.55 $309.45
Total $347.69 $325.58
Current Trans. SDC Rate $261.30 $261.30
Proposed Increase $86.39 $64.28
Example Residential
Transportation SDC
$3,327 $3,116
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 4
MEMORANDUM 6/12/2014 Page 3
Option A – Use “Level of Service” analysis for bicycle/pedestrian calculation in Improvement Fee
One option for calculating growth capacity for bicycle and pedestrian facilities is a Level of
Service (LOS) analysis. The LOS analysis is presented as an option for allocating costs associated with planned multi-use paths, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks. The bicycle /pedestrian
project list also includes pedestrian crossings, which like intersection projects for roadways, are
important components of the pedestrian network. However, in both options, these project costs are assumed to serve both existing and future development in proportion to future auto trips
(absent specific data on pedestrian trips or level of service).
Using a level of service approach enhances the equity of the methodology in that project cost
allocations are evaluated based on the appropriate planning/design standard for the particular improvement type. This approach will generally result in a somewhat higher portion of project costs related to growth for bike and pedestrian facilities; as existing user’s needs are assumed to
be met first by the existing inventory of facilities. Therefore, there is a greater likelihood that projects may be funded. This approach is also supported by local data and planning criteria.
Unlike roadway and intersection projects, trip data for bicycle and pedestrian improvements is
not available. Therefore, a defensible basis for determining growth capacity needs for bicycle and pedestrian facilities is a planned Level Of Service basis. The planned LOS is defined as the
quantity of future facilities per capita served. (See Attachment 3 for a description of this
calculation). Using the City’s existing and future bicycle/pedestrian data from the project list along with the population forecast for 2035, the Level of Service analysis results in the
following allocations of the project costs to growth. These percentages are then applied to the
respective bicycle/pedestrian project costs to determine the amount to be included in the SDC.
Allocation of Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities
Miles Added for % Allocation
Existing1 Growth Total Existing Growth
Multi Use Path 7.9 3.0 11.0 72% 28%
Bicycle Lanes 35.1 18.5 53.6 66% 34%
Road Projects2 25.0 18.1 43.1 58% 42%
Bicycle Projects 10.1 0.4 10.5 97% 3%
Subtotal 35.1 18.5 53.6
Sidewalks 17.9 28.2 46.1
Road Projects 25.0 18.1 43.1 58% 42%
Pedestrian Projects 0.0 2.9 2.9 0% 100%
Subtotal 25.0 21.0 46.0
1 Existing need assumed to be met first by current facilities
2 Road project allocations reflect each group’s share of future auto trip volumes
This approach demonstrates that Option A produces a higher portion of the bicycle/pedestrian
projects are attributable to growth than if the City uses Option B which assumes that 20% of all
bicycle/pedestrian projects are attributable to growth. The overall impact to the SDC rate to use
Option A is +$22.
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 4
MEMORANDUM 6/12/2014 Page 4
Option A meets the four criteria test as it is an equitable way to allocate the projects costs to
growth, it is consistent with the law, the City has the data to support the methodology, and it is
understandable to the public although somewhat more complex to explain than Option B.
Option B – Continue to use current methodology for bicycle/pedestrian calculation in Improvement Fee
Continuing with the City’s current methodology of using the projected growth in auto trips as
the basis for growth’s share of bicycle/pedestrian projects results in an across the board
allocation of 20% of bicycle/pedestrian project costs to growth. Option B meets the four criteria
test as it is still an equitable way to allocate project costs, it is consistent with the law, the City
has the data to support the calculation and it is easy to understand by the public.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direct staff to schedule a public hearing on the Transportation System SDC methodology using Option A and provide the 90-day notice to Interested Parties
and the 60 day notice that the methodology is available for review pursuant to ORS
223.304(7)(a).
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 4
1
Preliminary Transportation System Development Charges
PREPARED FOR: City of Springfield City Council
COPIES TO: Anette Spickard, City of Springfield
Len Goodwin, City of Springfield
PREPARED BY: Deb Galardi, Galardi Rothstein Group
DATE: June 6, 2014
Introduction
The purpose of this memorandum is to present the preliminary findings of the
transportation system development charge (SDC) analysis. Table 1 below provides a
summary of the preliminary SDC options. For purposes of development of the
improvement SDC, two options were developed. Both options reflect prior City Council
direction (from the May 19, work session) to assume external funding for roadway
projects consistent with historical practices (about 70 percent). The options differ in the
determination of growth-related costs for bike and pedestrian improvements: Option
“A” is based on a level of service analysis for each type of improvement, while Option B
uses the system-wide average growth in vehicle trips (20 percent) as the basis for
growth-related costs. The resulting SDC per single-family residential dwelling (before
application of 5% administrative charges) is also provided.
Table 1
Summary of Options
Component Option A Option B
Reimbursement $16.14 $16.14
Improvement $331.55 $309.45
Total $347.69 $325.58
Current SDC Rate $261.30 $261.30
Proposed Incr. $86.39 $64.28
% Increase 33% 25%
Residential SDC $3,327 $3,116
Each component of the SDC is summarized below.
Reimbursement Fee
The reimbursement fee was developed using the same methodology as the City’s
existing transportation SDC. The replacement cost of the existing arterial and collector
network is estimated, and external funding is deducted from the total, along with
remaining outstanding bond principal associated with the transportation system.
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 4
Preliminary Transportation SDC Analysis
2
As shown in Table 2, the net project cost is then multiplied by the estimated available
capacity in the existing system and the “local” growth cost (net of through trips), to
determine the SDC cost basis. Finally, the cost basis is divided by the projected growth
in trip ends to determine the reimbursement cost per trip end of $16.14. The preliminary
SDC is lower than the current reimbursement SDC due to a reduction in both the
available capacity and local trip percentages, compared to the prior methodology.
Table 2
Preliminary Reimbursement SDC
Component External % Replacement $
Net Project Cost $26,566,752
X Available Capacity Cost 11.7% $3,108,310
X Local Growth Cost 83.6% $2,598,370
Divided by Growth Trip Ends 161,016
SDC per Trip End $16.14
Improvement Fee
Preliminary improvement fee options are provided in Table 3 (following page). The
options reflect the scenarios defined previously for external roadway funding and
allocation of bike/pedestrian improvements. The development of the improvement fee
cost basis involves the following steps:
1. Capacity costs are determined. Non-capacity costs generally include overlays of
existing roadways and reconstruction of existing facilities
2. Capacity costs are reduced by assumed percent of external funding, as follows:
a. State projects: 90% external funding
b. Roadway projects: 70%
c. Intersection projects: 30%
d. Bike & pedestrian facilities: 0-70% depending on type of project
3. Local roadway costs are reduced by capacity for through trips (estimated to be
about 16%).
4. The share of local capacity needed for growth (the improvement fee cost basis) is
determined, as follows:
a. Roadways: share of future traffic volumes on specific roadway or nearby
intersection
b. Intersections: 100% less any existing deficiency
c. Bike & pedestrian: 20% of future auto trips or level of service analysis
(which yields growth share of 28%-46% depending on project type)
As with the reimbursement fee, the improvement SDC per trip end is then determined
by dividing the cost basis by the projected growth in trip ends.
Attachment 2, Page 2 of 4
Preliminary Transportation SDC Analysis
3
Table 3
Improvement Fee Options ($/Trip End)
Component Option A Option B
Roadway Projects $171.42 $171.42
Intersections $31.52 $31.52
Bike/Ped (Combined) $17.95 $5.98
Bike Only $0.10 $0.55
Multi-Use Paths $15.28 $8.30
Pedestrian – Sidewalks $4.49 $0.88
Pedestrian - Crossing $7.44 $7.44
Other Projects $4.28 $4.28
State Facilities $79.07 $79.07
Total $331.55 $309.45
Option A = External funding = 70%; bike/pedestrian based on level of service
Option B = External funding = 70%; bike/pedestrian based on % future auto trips
The total project costs included on the project list are about $505 million. The figure
below shows the portion of project costs funded by SDCs under the two options ($50
million to $53 million). The majority of funds are assumed to come from external
sources.
SDC Comparison
The chart on the following page presents a comparison of the City’s existing and
preliminary revised transportation SDCs for a single-family residential dwelling unit
with transportation SDCs in other communities.
$53 $50
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
Option A Option B
$
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
Cost Basis Option
Total Project Costs vs. SDC Costs
SDC Costs Total Costs
Attachment 2, Page 3 of 4
Preliminary Transportation SDC Analysis
4
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
Cr
e
s
w
e
l
l
Pe
n
d
l
e
t
o
n
Gr
a
n
t
s
P
a
s
s
Th
e
D
a
l
l
e
s
Mi
l
w
a
u
k
i
e
Co
t
t
a
g
e
G
r
o
v
e
Eu
g
e
n
e
Ho
o
d
R
i
v
e
r
Sa
l
e
m
Ve
n
e
t
a
Al
b
a
n
y
Co
r
v
a
l
l
i
s
Sp
r
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
(
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
)
St
a
y
t
o
n
Po
r
t
l
a
n
d
Gr
e
s
h
a
m
Ne
w
b
e
r
g
Ro
s
e
b
u
r
g
Sp
r
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
(
O
p
t
i
o
n
B
)
Ma
d
r
a
s
Sp
r
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
(
O
p
t
i
o
n
A
)
Cl
a
c
k
a
m
a
s
C
o
u
n
t
y
Me
d
f
o
r
d
Re
d
m
o
n
d
La
k
e
O
s
w
e
g
o
Be
n
d
Gr
e
s
h
a
m
-
P
l
e
a
s
a
n
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
Wi
l
s
o
n
v
i
l
l
e
Be
a
v
e
r
t
o
n
Tu
a
l
a
t
i
n
Gr
e
s
h
a
m
-
S
p
r
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
Ha
p
p
y
V
a
l
l
e
y
Residential Transportation SDC Comparison
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
,
P
a
g
e
4
o
f
4
City of Springfield Transportation SDC Draft Project List
Project
NumberProject NameTotal Cost
R01Extension From Royal Caribbean Way to International Way $4,300,000$433,44010%
R02Gateway Street/International Way to UGB$950,000$65,9457%
R03New collector; Game farm Rd. east to International Way $6,300,000$635,04010%
R04Maple Island Road Ext. Deadmond Ferry to Beltline$3,100,000$312,48010%
R05Riverbend Drive Extension$1,600,000$161,28010%
R06Improvements to Baldy View Ln & New McKenzie Loop Roadway $10,200,000$1,028,16010%
R08Mallard Avenue ‐ Gateway Street to Game Farm Road$4,530,000$456,62410%
R09Connectivity from Laura St. to Pioneer Pkwy $3,300,000$182,9526%
R12Franklin Riverfront Collector$7,700,000$523,9087%
R16E 17th Ave: Glenwood to Henderson $1,900,000$129,2767%
R17Henderson, East19th Ave to Franklin $3,400,000$211,6856%
R18E. 19th Street, Henderson to McVay $3,500,000$226,1256%
R2419th Street; Hayden Bridge Road to Yolanda Avenue$2,400,000$169,3447%
R25Hayden Bridge Road$12,000,000$809,5447%
R26Yolanda Avenue; 23rd Street to 31st Street$460,000$29,8716%
R2731st St to 34th St $9,400,000$663,2647%
R28 New 3‐L Collector; Marcola Road to 31st Street $9,000,000$635,0407%
R2931st Street; Hayden Bridge Road to U Street$3,800,000$248,4197%
R34Centennial Blvd Extension; 28th Street to 31st Street $9,500,000$718,2008%
R3642nd Street Improvements, Marcola to RR Crossing $6,000,000$378,0006%
R37Commercial Ave from 42nd St. to 48th St. north of main street $19,000,000$3,830,40020%
R39S. 48th Street Extension; Aster to Daisy Street$3,200,000$258,0488%
R41S 54th Street, Main to Daisy Street$960,000$31,4503%
R42Glacier Street; Holly Street to S. 55th Street$6,300,000$952,56015%
R45Jasper‐Natron Area Improvements $67,000,000$10,130,40015%
R46Mt Vernon, Bob Straub Pkwy to Mountain gate Dr.$2,500,000$378,00015%
R47Haul Road Green Street, Mt Vernon Road to UGB $11,000,000$1,023,5019%
R4979th Street Extension; Thurston Road to Main Street $8,200,000$578,5927%
R50Gateway/Beltline Phase 2 Project $12,000,000$1,183,07110%
US03Aspen St. from Centennial Blvd. to West D St.$2,800,000$170,2756%
US04Urban standards, 21st St. from D St. to Main St.$2,300,000$108,4245%
US0528th Street: Centennial Boulevard to Main Street$4,300,000$281,7437%
US06South 28th from Main St. to South F street$6,000,000$350,3816%
US14Thurston from Weaver Rd. to UGB$4,800,000$305,8806%
Subtotal $253,700,000$27,601,32111%
R50Intersection Improvements at Main Street and Mountaingate Drive$900,000$90,00010%
R58Interchange at OR126/52nd St$40,000,000$4,000,00010%
R59Interchange at OR126/Main St$50,000,000$5,000,00010%
R24Intersection Improvements 19th Ave and McVay Blvd.$2,500,000$250,00010%
R19Franklin Blvd/MacVay Hway Roundabout$7,000,000$700,00010%
R25Multimodal Improvements McVay Blvd; 19th Ave to I‐5$47,000,000$1,544,5693%
R14Q Street Improvements, 5th Street to Laura Street$1,600,000$62,4004%
R18Franklin Blvd Multi‐Modal$35,000,000$1,085,0003%
Subtotal $184,000,000$12,731,9697%
R11Intersection Improvements at 5th Street and Q Street$550,000$148,30927%
R30Intersection Improvements at Marcola Rd/19th St.$320,000$100,48231%
R31Intersection Improvements 31st St and Marcola Rd$1,900,000$1,081,79457%
R32Intersection Improvements at 42nd Street and Marcola Road$2,800,000$1,638,44859%
R33Intersection Improvements at Centennial Blvd and 28th St.$1,800,000$1,053,28859%
R38Intersection Improvements at S. 42nd Street and Daisy Street$1,800,000$1,053,28859%
Subtotal $9,170,000$5,075,60955%
S‐1Phase 2 of Beltline/Gateway Improvements $225,000$90,00040%
S‐2OR 126 Expressway Management Plan (ODOT)$80,000$8,00010%
S‐3Pioneer Parkway/Q Street/Laura Street (ODOT)$125,000$12,50010%
S‐4New Crossing of OR 126 betw. 5th & 15th Streets$100,000$00%
S‐5Centennial Blvd. ‐ Prescott Lane to Mill St.$100,000$00%
S‐6Pioneer Parkway/Centennial Blvd. Intersection$100,000$00%
SDC Portion
Roadway Projects
State Projects
Study Projects
Intersection Projects
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 2
City of Springfield Transportation SDC Draft Project List
Project
NumberProject NameTotal Cost SDC Portion
S‐7Centennial Blvd. ‐ Pioneer Parkway to Mohawk$100,000$00%
S‐8Mohawk/Olympic/18th/Centennial Triangle $100,000$15,00015%
S‐9New Bridge ‐ Walnut Rd/W. D to Glenwood/Franklin$150,000$30,00020%
S‐10Main St./S. A St. Improvements ‐ Mill Street to 21st Street (ODOT)$20,000$2,00010%
S‐11Glenwood Industrial Areas$75,000$22,50030%
S‐12Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge betw. Glenwood & Dorris Ranch$100,000$30,00030%
S‐13Access on Main St. betw. 28th Street and 32nd Street (ODOT)$100,000$10,00010%
S‐14East‐West Connectivity betw. 28th Street & 32nd Street$125,000$18,75015%
S‐15New Crossing of OR 126 near Thurston High School$100,000$10,00010%
S‐16Connectivity South of OR 126 and Jessica Street$50,000$40,00080%
Subtotal $1,650,000$288,75018%
PB01McKenzie River Path; Existing Terminus to Maple Island Road $3,000,000 TBDTBD
PB02Multiuse Path Between Flamingo Ave and Gateway St$70,000TBDTBD
PB03Ped/Bike Improvements from Game Farm Road to Gateway Loop $80,000 TBDTBD
PB04MUP; Riverbend Trail to Ann Ct./Wayside Loop $80,000 TBDTBD
PB05Hartman Ln. and Don St; Harlow Road to OR126 $180,000 TBDTBD
PB07MUP Extension in EWEB ROW; Pioneer Prkwy to Don Street$1,730,000TBDTBD
PB08Intersection Improvements Along Hayden Bridge Way $260,000 TBDTBD
PB09EWEB Path Crossing $50,000 TBDTBD
PB10Intersection Improvements at 2nd Street and Q Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB11Multiuse Path (By‐Gully) Extension Pioneer Prkwy to 5th Street$590,000TBDTBD
PB12Multiuse Path; By‐Gully Path South Along I‐5 East Side$2,900,000TBDTBD
PB13By‐Gully Path at Anderson Road to Centennial Blvd$90,000TBDTBD
PB14Rainbow Dr., Centennial to W. D St.$60,000TBDTBD
PB15W. D St; D St. Path to Mills St.$10,000TBDTBD
PB16W. D St; Aspen to D St. Path$190,000TBDTBD
PB17Multiuse Path; I‐5 to Willamette River Bridges (Glenwood)$2,500,000 TBDTBD
PB18Multiuse Path; Willamette River Bridges in Glenwood South to UGB$2,900,000TBDTBD
PB19New Bridge Over Willamette River Betweek Glenwood and Downtown$10,300,000TBDTBD
PB20Mill Street, Centennial to Main$90,000TBDTBD
PB21Intersection Improvements at Pioneer Parkway and D/E/F Streets$80,000TBDTBD
PB22Intersection Improvements at 5th St. and Centennial Blvd.$560,000TBDTBD
PB235th Street; Centennial Blvd to A Street $50,000 TBDTBD
PB24D, E or F Street; 5th St. to 28th St.; Bike Route Improvements $190,000 TBDTBD
PB25Visibility Improvements, 5th Street and D Street$10,000TBDTBD
PB26A Street from W. A Street to 10th Street$40,000TBDTBD
PB27MUP, South 2nd Street to Mill Street$3,100,000TBDTBD
PB29Mill Race Path, S 2nd Street to Jasper Street$7,100,000TBDTBD
PB3033rd Street from V Street to Bike Path $10,000 TBDTBD
PB32Multiuse Path Between Willamette River and OR126, 42nd to 52nd $3,700,000 TBDTBD
PB33Main Street Pedestrian Crossing between 34th and 35th Streets$90,000TBDTBD
PB34Main Street Pedestrian Crossing at 38th Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB35Main Street Pedestrian Crossing at 41st Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB36Bike Route on Virginia and Daisy Streets, S 32nd to Bob Straub$130,000TBDTBD
PB37Booth Kelly Rd$2,817,000TBDTBD
PB39Main Street Pedestrian Crossing between 48th/49th Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB40Ped Improvements at 51st/Main Streets$10,000TBDTBD
PB41Main Street Pedestrian Crossing at Chapman Lane$90,000TBDTBD
PB42Main Street Pedestrian Crossing at 57th Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB43Bob Straub Parkway/Daisy Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB44Mountain Gate Drive from 57th Pl to Dogwood Street$260,000TBDTBD
PB45Ped Crossing Improvements at Bob Straub Prkwy and Mt Vernon Road$390,000TBDTBD
PB46Haul Road Path South 49th to UGB$3,600,000TBDTBD
PB47Intersection Improvements at Thurston Road and 66th Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB48Intersection Improvements at Thurston Road and 69th Street$90,000TBDTBD
PB4967th Street, Main St. to Ivy St.$160,000TBDTBD
PB50Ivy Street; 67th Street to Main Street$20,000TBDTBD
PB5170th Street, Main St. to Ivy St.$50,000TBDTBD
PB52City Wide RRFB Installations $4,400,000 TBDTBD
US01Game Farm Road South Mallard Ave to Harlow Road $4,100,000 TBDTBD
US11Clearwater Lane; Jasper Road to UGB$470,000TBDTBD
Subtotal $57,227,000
Total $505,747,000
Bike/Pedestrian Projects
Attachment 3, Page 2 of 2
1
Total Future
Facility Miles
(ex. 80 miles)
Total Future
Population (ex.
80K)
Miles per Capita
(1 mile per 1,000
population)
Bike & Pedestrian Level of Service
Allocation
(example calculation using hypothetical data)
Existing Need = Existing population (ex. 50K) * Planning Standard = 50 miles
Growth Need = Growth population (ex. 30K) * Planning Standard = 30 miles
Step 1: Determine Planning Standard:
Step 2: Determine Total Capacity Needs
Existing Need (ex, 50 miles) – Existing Facilities (ex. 40 miles) = Deficiency (10
miles)
Step 3: Determine Existing Deficiency
Step 4: Growth Share = Additional Facility Miles – Existing Deficiency
Ex 40 additional miles – 10 mile deficiency = 75% growth
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
4
,
P
a
g
e
1
o
f
1