The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscellaneous Miscellaneous 2013-12-13 Task J r filoA RFI 1 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic ?`2a/3_.off z/c Concrete - Clarification Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 1 Date Due: 12/13/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: "Please confirm that with the deletion of the LG1 and LG1A luminaries, per owner's bulletin 1 that structural detail 11 on S2.0, architectural detail 20 on A7.1 and 9 on A9.0 are no longer required for construction. " Response: That is correct, those details can be eliminated as that light fixture is no longer being used..Please provide KeyBank with a credit for any materials, supplies and/or labor. Thank You. Attachments There are no attachments for this section. Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. Page: 1 of 1 12/13/2013 Task RFI 2 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Lighting - Clarification Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 2 Date Due: 12/13/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: On print E2.1 the LD4 fixture dimension is listed at a length of 15' 10". On print A1.0 of bulletin# 1 is 17' 1"from wall face to wall face. Please clarify the exact dimension of this fixture so that the manufacturer can provide this fixture with the proper length. Response: Please find the below response from Jeff Salvagin @ TBA: Both dimensions mentioned below are correct. From wall face to wall face is 17'-1". The 15'-10" indicated for the fixture length on the electrical drawings is excluding the 90 degree corners specified with the fixture. The fixture run length with (2) 90 degree corners comes to 17'-1"total. Please let us know if you require a sketch. Thank You, Jeff S. Attachments There are no attachments for this section. Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. Page: 1 of 1 12/14/2013 Task • RFI 3 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Structural Metals - Clarification Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst • RFI Number: 3 Date Due: 12/19/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: S1.1,Addendum 1 at gridline 1, between D & F calls out the TOS for the HSS7x5x5/16" at 19'-4 1/4"this appears to conflict with the approved submitted shop drawings from KO custom fab. Comments on KO custom fab drawing E3 call for a TOS of 18'-11 1/4" and the cloud would appear to capture the TOS of the 1-155 4x4x5/16 as well as the 5x7x5/16. Detail 3 on S3.1 addendum 1 shows the 5x7 beam • below TOS of the 4x4 beam. Please confirm TOS for both the 4x4 and 5x7 beams in this area. Response: Please find the Structural Engineers Response below: Top of steel for the HSS7x5 and the HSS4x4 is 18'-11-1/4". Thanks, Patty Fellenstein -TBA Attachments There are no attachments for this section. Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. Page: 1 of 1 12/16/2013 • Task RFI 4 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Doors & Windows - Request Alternate Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 4 Date Due: 12/19/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: On sheet A1.2, at doors 100A and 1006 HW Set 1 calls out for panic hardware part number 33A-NL-OP. This part is used for single doors and is rim style, this part will not work for pair of doors. Please advise. Response: Use 3347A-NL-OP Von Duprin concealed vertical rod exit device night latch cylinder assembly. • • Attachments There are no attachments for this section. Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. • • Page: 1 of 1 12/16/2013 Task RFI 5 • 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Structural Metals - Proposed Alternate Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 5 Date Due: 12/19/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: Sheet S3.0, detail 11, "beam to column connections" shows knife plates inserted into slots in the tube steel column. Section D-D shows a 1/4"fillet weld where the plates intersect. This weld will not be possible as shown. Steel fabricator proposes continuing slotted steel tube to top of column, bench weld the knife plates together then insert assembly into tube. Please see attached detail and confirm that this is an acceptable solution. Response: The proposed detail is acceptable. Thanks, Patty Fellenstein -TBA • Attachments 11 on S3.0 proposed.pdf 31 Kb Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. Page: 1 of 1 12/13/2013 Task RFI 6 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Concrete - Clarification Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 6 Date Due: 12/16/2013 • Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: Sheet S1.0 addendum 1, there are multiple call outs for detail 9A on S2.0. should this call out read 9 on S2.0? there is no 9A on Sheet S2.0, addendum 1 Response: Please see the response below from the Structural Engineer: Section 9A callout is correct. Section 9A is the plate detail shown at the upper right hand portion of section 9. Thanks, Patty Fellenstein • Attachments There are no attachments for this section. • Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. • Page: 1 of 1 12/14/2013 • Task RFI 7 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Concrete - Clarification Assigned By: david brookhart Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 7 Date Due: 12/19/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: On sheet S1.0, addendum 1, at the intersection of gridlines J-6, there are 4 footing details that overlap or abut each other. Detail 9 on S2.0, detail 1 on S2.0, detail 6 on S2.1 and detail 12 on S4.1. Please provide a section thru or isometric to show how the various footing details should connect. Response: Please see the Structural Engineers Response below: See section 12/S4.1. This section is cut on elevation 1/S4.0 which is called out on S1.0. Thanks, Patty Fellenstein-TBA Attachments There are no attachments for this section. Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. • Page: 1 of 1 12/16/2013 Task RFI 8 10010 - Mohawk & Olympic Concrete - Clarification • Assigned By: david brookhart • Assigned To: Scott Wallenhorst RFI Number: 8 Date Due: 12/18/2013 Status: Completed Category: In Process Request: Due to Over excavation for adding compacted structural fill below the building footings, it has been proposed to pour the perimeter footings in multiple pours to allow pea gravel backfill at the over X condition. the extra pour will create a cold joint approximately 8' below top of slab. Please confirm that the use of pea gravel as back fill and cold • joint at perimeter footings is acceptable. Response: Please find a response below from the Structural Engineer: A cold joint is acceptable but the depth of the cold joint must be coordinated with the required concrete depth for the holddown anchors at the shearwalls and the anchor rods at the columns. The required depth for the anchor rods shall be provided by one pour. Therefore there cannot be a cold joint thru the anchor rods where the required depth is made up by the 2 pours. This will also need to be coordinated with the slab reinforcement with regards to the slab dowels to ensure that the slab dowels are tying the 2 pours together. The surface of the first pour shall be left as a roughen surface prior to the 2nd pour. Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Patty Fellenstein -TBA • Attachments There are no attachments for this section. Document Links (Existing documents within Expesite) There are no attachments for this section. Page: 1 of 1 12/16/2013 •