The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBuilding Field Test & Inspection Report 2013-11-6 oil- s $ , Dl ply �17 Bend Office (541)330-9155 ' � Geotechnical Office (503)601-8250 Carlson Testing, Eugene lemOfficec (503)589-1252 60. iL 9 Inc.Ill Salem Office (g03)$g9-1252 Tigard Office (503)684-3460 Daily Report of Structural Steel Client: SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD - STEVEN WAGES Project: GORRIE CREEK GATE PLATFORM (PROJECT #13707) C'1'1 ,1ob R': _ E1301446.B Address: SPRINGFIELD OR _._ _ Jurisdiction: SPRINGFIELD - CTI representative D_ SMITH OBOA 442 _ -- was on site this date Nov. 05, 2013 to perform Special Inspection for: Permit 513_1979... DFS //(s) PO Number: PROJECT #13707 -- SCOPE OF INSPECTION Location of steel inspection [to include grid lines, elevations (floors) and drawing details]: I. Checked in with superintendent. client or shop rep. STEVE WAGES PIECE MARK 4-9 COLUMNS AND SEAMS. PROCESS USED Name. _—_ —_._______...__ SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD WAS FLAW AND WELDS APPEAR VISUALLY ACCEPTABLE PER _ - - - - - Company: AWS D1.1 2. Inspection was "I BC" Continuous xi Periodic -` 3. Work perforated: n In the field ® At fab shop NOTE: REFERENCE EMAILS DATED 10-25-13 AND 11-04-13 (ATTACHED) KIi41 STEEL —_._.__ 4. If shop inspection do they have fabrication and QC — --- -- --"" procedures? x Yes No N/A —'"-- INSPECTION Yes NoN/A — 1. Reviewed previous inspection reports'' X •2. Verified steel materials are in compliance by reviewing - _ random samples of the mill test reports. steel ID X markings or other documentation. 3. Verified weld filler materials conform. X - 4. Checked steel members to see they were fabricated and erected in accordance with the workmanship and X _. tolerances required. 5. Checked welded studs and structural connections were installed as required. X REPORT SUMMARY 6. Verified high strength bolls and fasteners eonfomt. • x I. Work inspected was: I x I Completed 0 In progress 7. Verified the quality of welds produced by welders, welding operators,and tackers conform. X 2. Completed work inspected was in compliance with 8. Verified steel frame joint details for bracing,stiffening, ® Approved plans and specifications ri Shop drawings member locat ions,and application of joint details at each X connection are in compliance by random sampling. RpI Design Change Submittal N/A Document#(s) STEEL DRWGS (NOTE) Dated: 10-29-13 WELDER INFORMATION 3. Noncompliance item(s) were noted this date, details on Certification Name: 9025 DoNALDSON — following page(s). Yes [H No E N/A Certification .4: 0025 _ X 4. Noncompliance item(s) were reinspected this date, details Yes No N/A on following page(s). Yes [H No x N/A Verified the contractor's Welding Procedure Specifications are in conformance with x Conform LI Remain in progress AWS requirements. 2. Verified the essential variables outlined in the Report(s) findings were discussed and left with Welding Procedure Specifications were X STEVE WAGES employed during execution of the work. SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD of 3. Verified the we dnbi 06 of reinforcing steel Based on the Code,approval is required from the Building Official belbre the other than ASTM A706. _ X SPECIAL INSPECTED items anted above can be covered.Carlson Testing has no authority to direct mirk or contractors or subcontractors. See additional report page(s). [] Distribute attachments. Page of -,.! Daily Report of Structural Steel For: 11/06/2013 CTI Job 4: E13D149a.5 . Project: GORRIE CREEK GATE PLATFORM (PROJECT 413707) • Notes: In some cases more than one box may be checked for a given item on the front page. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in fi without prior authorization from this office. Under all circumstances, the information contained in this report is provided subject to all terms and conditions of CTI's General Conditions in effect at the time this report is prepared. No party other than those to whom CTI has distributed this report shall he entitled to use or rely upon the information contained in this document. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CARLSON TESTING, INC. David Smith Project Manager �� 4-2 CC: SPRINGFIELD UTILITY TICARD - STEVEN WAGES STEVENW@SUEUTIL.COM PACIFIC EXCAVATION INC - TRAVIS CRAIG 59970 HWY 99N.EUGENE OR • • WAGES Steven From: Sam Corbin [samc @branchengineering.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 9:13 AM To: WAGES Steven Cc: 'Rick Hernandez' Subject: RE: SKMBT_42113102417500 Attachments: Gorrie Creek Erection Drawing Redline.pdf Steven: Substitution of 5/8" bolts for the specified 1/2" welds studs is fine. As far as the rest of the shop drawing goes, you were correct in noting that this submission is inadequate. See attached redline to the erection drawing for the several of issues I spotted. Other items include a lack of weld symbols, part MK1 not indicating what steel section is used, and lack of proper dimensioning views on connecting plates and angles. SAM CORBIN, P.E. Project Engineer BRANCH ENGINEERING, INC. 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 p_541.746.0637 f_541.746.0389 www.branchengineering.com Springfield OR 1 Salem OR Original Message From: WAGES Steven [mailto:stevenw(asubutil.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 8:48 AM To: 'Sam Corbin ' Cc: 'Rick Hernandez' Subject: FW: SKMBT_42113102417500 The contractor is wanting to submit with bolts in lieu of welded studs (steel guys comment - unless you are mass production there' re a pain). STEVEN WAGES SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - WATER DIVISION CELL : 541.525.4113 Original Message From: Travis Craig [mailto:TravisPpacificexc.com] Sent : Thursday, October 24, 2013 6:51 PM To: WAGES Steven Cc: Beau Solesbee; mail(thkiwifab.com Subject: SKMBT_42113102417500 «SKMBT_42113102417500.pdf» Here is the erection drawing. This did not come through with the previous print. 1 WAGES Steven From: samc @branchengineering.com Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 11:57 AM To: WAGES Steven Cc: rickh @branchengineering.com Subject: RE: RFI Gorrie Creek With a full-pen weld, yes. On November 4, 2013 at 10:58 AM WAGES Steven <stevenw( subutil.com>wrote: I just got a call from the GC indicating that the steel fabricated prep the channel for the splice on the side that cantilevers over the creek? Does that work? STEVEN WAGES SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT-WATER DIVISION CELL: 541.525.4113 From: samcnbranchengineerinq.com [mailto:samc(nlbranchengineering.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 10:48 AM To: WAGES Steven Cc: rickhnbranchengineerinq.com Subject: Re: RFI Gorrie Creek "hhat'd be fine. Actually; the design load on that end of the channels is really low... l'd be ok with welding on a piece of rebar (already have weldable reinforcement on this job, so doesn't require a new spec) near the top of the channel to extend that last 8" instead of going to the trouble to full-pen splice a channel. On November 4, 2013 at 10:05 AM WAGES Steven <steven v subutil.corn> wrote: Craig with KIWI Fab wanted me to ask if it will be ok to splice the four long MC8x8.S. The MC steel conies in a 20ft length and the four pieces are 10'-8", so you would have a 8" splice that would be cast in the concrete footing. It would be a full pen weld and buried in concrete. Let me know. Thanks, • STEVEN WAGES SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT-WATER DIVISION CELL: 541.525.4113 From: Beau Solesbee [mailto:Beau @pacificexc.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 9:12 AM To: WAGES Steven Subject: Gorrie Creek 1