HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive PlanAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 11/4/2013
Meeting Type: Regular Meeting
Staff Contact/Dept.: Mark Metzger/DPW Staff Phone No: 541-726-3775
Estimated Time: 5 Minutes
S P R I N G F I E L D C I T Y C O U N C I L Council Goals: Mandate
ITEM TITLE: 2012 WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ACTION
REQUESTED:
Conduct a second reading and adopt AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2012
WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS A REFINEMENT PLAN OF THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN
AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) FOR APPLICATION WITHIN THE AREA OF PLANNING JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
The City of Springfield relies on Willamalane Park and Recreation District for park
and recreation planning under Statewide Planning Goal 8—Recreational Needs. The 2004 Willamalane Comprehensive Plan is a refinement plan of the Metro Plan.
The 2012 Plan is intended to update and replace the 2004 Willamalane
Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is being processed as a refinement plan amendment.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Staff Report Attachment 2: 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Attachment 3: Comprehensive Plan Appendices (Community Needs Assessment)
Attachment 4: Planning Commission Recommendation Attachment 5: Adopting Ordinance
DISCUSSION:
The Council conducted a public hearing on October 17, 2013. No testimony was
received in opposition to the proposed plan.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed 2012 Willamalane
Comprehensive Plan on July 16, 2013, voting unanimously to recommend Council approval of the plan. The Commission recommendation is enclosed as Attachment
4. Staff has evaluated the proposed 2012 Plan against the approval criteria for
refinement plan amendments found in Section 5.6-115 of the Springfield Development Code. The attached staff report (Attachment 1) contains findings which provided the Planning Commission a substantive base for recommending
Council approval of the Plan.
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 1
Staff Report
Refinement Plan Amendment- Type IV
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
Project Name: 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
Project Proposal: To adopt the 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (2012 Plan)
which amends the 2004 Comprehensive Plan. The 2012 Plan includes a new Community Needs
Assessment and makes extensive changes to the “Strategies and Actions” and the “Capital Improvement
Program” sections of the 2004 Plan.
Case Number: TYP413-00003
Application Submitted Date: June 4, 2013
DLCD Notification Date: June 4, 2013
Referral Notice to the City of Eugene: June 4, 2013
Joint Springfield and Lane County Planning Commission Hearing: July 16, 2013
Joint City Council and Board of County Commissioners Hearing: October 17, 2013
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2004 the City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners adopted the Willamalane Park and
Recreation Comprehensive Plan (2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan is a refinement plan of the Eugene-
Springfield Metropolitan General Plan (Metro Plan). It details the park and recreation needs of the
greater Springfield community and describes programs and facilities that Willamalane has developed or
is developing to meet those needs. Like other planning documents, the 2004 Plan is intended to be
periodically updated. These updates and the revisions they contain are processed as refinement plan
amendments. This proposal is to update the 2004 Plan by adoption of the Willamalane 2012 Park and
Recreation Comprehensive Plan (2012 Plan).
Planning for the 2012 Plan started in June 2010 with the initiation of a new Community Needs
Assessment (CNA). The CNA was used as the basis for crafting the first draft of the 2012 Plan. Through
the month of September 2012, Willamalane presented the draft 2012 Plan to the Springfield Planning
Commission, the Springfield City Council, the Lane County Planning Commission and the Lane County
Board of Commissioners for review and comment. The 2012 Plan was also presented to the Springfield
School District and to the general public for comment.
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 2
After gathering input from the community, Willamalane staff finalized its revisions to the 2012 Plan and
presented these to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District Board of Directors for adoption. The
2012 Plan was formally adopted on October 10, 2012 by the Willamalane Board.
The 2012 Plan includes updates to each element of the 2004 Plan, but perhaps most significant are the
changes to the Strategies and Actions and Capital Improvement Program sections. These changes
include:
• The removal of certain projects (mainly those that have been completed since 2004)
•The addition of projects (primarily based on the Community Needs Assessment findings, but also
from city refinement plans, district site master plans and new opportunities)
• The revision of existing projects (from a variety of input)
Section 5.6-115 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) provides the criteria for approving
refinement plan amendments. The section states:
“In reaching a decision on these actions [Refinement Plan Amendments], the Planning Commission and
the City Council shall adopt findings which demonstrate conformance to the following:
A. The Metro Plan;
B. Applicable State statutes; and
C. Applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules.”
Staff has evaluated the proposed 2012 Plan and has prepared a report that contains findings which
address the requisite approval criteria described above. These findings provide a basis for concluding
that the adoption of the Willamalane 2012 Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan to replace the 2004
Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, meets the approval criteria found in SDC Section 5.6-115.
II. BACKGROUND
In 2004 the City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners adopted the Willamalane 2004 Park
and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan is a refinement plan of the Eugene-
Springfield Metropolitan General Plan (Metro Plan) that details the park and recreation needs of the
greater Springfield area and describes programs and facilities that the District proposed to develop to
meet those needs. In the past eight years, Willamalane has worked to implement the 2004 Plan's
strategies and actions. Highlights of these efforts include:
• Renovation of the EWEB bike path
• A large playground, picnic area and dog park at Lively Park
• A new community recreation center (Willamalane Center) to replace the Memorial Building
• Three new neighborhood parks (Rob Adams, Jasper Meadows and Volunteer)
• A sports park with artificial turf soccer fields
• A new playground at Willamalane Park
• A new walking and bicycle path along the Middle Fork of the Willamette River (under construction)
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 3
The 2004 Plan, like other Metro Plan documents, is intended to be periodically updated. Since its
adoption, the Springfield area has experienced significant changes, and Willamalane has developed the
2012 Plan better meet the needs and desires of the community. Chapter 1 of the 2012 Plan summarizes
the process steps used in its preparation and review.
The Planning Process
The planning process included three phases (Figure 1): • Determining needs;
• Developing the plan; and
• Adopting the plan.
Figure 1: Comprehensive Planning Process (2012 Plan pg. 2)
Phase I: Determining the Needs
Willamalane conducted and completed the Community Needs Assessment (CNA) portion of the
Comprehensive Plan update between June 2010 and March 2011. The CNA was presented to the
Springfield Planning Commission for review and discussion on June 7, 2011. The City Council and Lane
County Board of Commissioners reviewed the assessment on June 13, 2011 and June 22, 2011
respectively.
The CNA identified what the community needs and wants in terms of parks, natural areas, recreation
facilities and programs. The report synthesized the results of:
• Community involvement activities
• Park and facility analysis
• Recreation services analysis
• Management and operations analysis.
The web link below opens the Community Needs Assessment document which is contained in Appendix
A to the Comprehensive Plan.
Download the Comprehensive Plan Appendices
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 4
Phase II: Developing the Plan
In the second phase of the planning process, strategies and actions were developed for acquiring,
developing, improving and managing parks, natural areas, walking and biking trails, recreation facilities,
and program opportunities in Willamalane’s planning area over the next 20 years. These strategies and
actions are based on Community Needs Assessment results, the 2004 Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan implementation, and additional public input from a variety of stakeholders,
including Willamalane staff and Board of Directors, City of Springfield, Lane County and Springfield
Public Schools.
A Capital Improvement Plan was then developed by prioritizing the proposed capital
improvement projects. Two 10-year funded phases and a third unfunded project list are
proposed, as well as cost estimates and a financing strategy. Staff then analyzed the potential
operational costs of implementing the capital projects identified in the Capital Improvement Plan.
After a public open house to review draft recommendations and priorities, as well as additional
input opportunities at Springfield SummerFair, the Draft 2012 Plan was developed for committee,
staff and community review.
Phase III: Adopting the Plan
Community Review and Comment
On June 14, 2012, Willamalane held an open house for the public to review the work to date on the
Draft 2012 Plan. Approximately 100 people attended, and 64 questionnaires were completed.
The Willamalane Board of Directors reviewed the Draft 2012 Plan on July 25, 2012. Staff received
additional input from project partners and the City of Springfield and Lane County in September 2012
and made final changes to the plan.
Formal Adoption
The Willamalane Board of Directors formally adopted the 2012 Park and Recreation Comprehensive
Plan on Oct. 10, 2012. It is now proposed for adoption as a Refinement Plan to the Eugene-Springfield
Metropolitan Area General Plan by City of Springfield and Lane County.
The web link below opens the 2012 Plan
Download the 2012 Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
III. FINDINGS
Procedural Requirements
The Metro Plan describes itself as a framework plan that is intended to be supplemented by more
detailed refinement plans, programs, and policies. (Metro Plan pg. I-6)
Refinements to the Metro Plan can include: (a) city-wide comprehensive policy documents, such as the
1984 Eugene Community Goals and Policies; (b) functional plans and policies addressing single subjects
throughout the area, such as the 2001 Eugene-Springfield Public Facilities and Services Plan (Public
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 5
Facilities and Services Plan) and 2001 TransPlan; and (c) neighborhood plans or special area studies that
address those issues that are unique to a specific geographical area (Metro Plan pg. I-6).
The 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan is a single subject plan that is a type of
refinement of the Metro Plan. The procedural requirements for adopting a refinement plan are
described in SDC Sections 5.6-100 and 5.1-140.
Section 5.6-105 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) indicates that the Planning Director,
Planning Commission, City Council or a resident of the City can initiate adoption proceedings. Such
refinement plans are reviewed under a “Type IV” procedure (Section 5.6-110) and require public
hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council. Type IV procedures are detailed in
Section 5.1-140 of the SDC. The proposed refinement plan adoption was initiated by the Director on
June 4, 2013.
SDC Section 5.2-110 (B) requires that legislative land use decisions be advertised in a newspaper of
general circulation, providing information about the legislative action and the time, place and location of
the hearing.
The Director shall also mail notice to the Department of Land Conservation and Development as
specified in OAR 660-18-0020.
Findings:
#1. The City of Springfield initiated adoption proceedings on June 4, 2013 for the 2012
Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is not site-
specific and falls under the definition of a legislative action.
#2. A “DLCD Notice Proposed Amendment” was e-mailed with mailed copies following to the
Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on June 4, 2013 alerting
the agency to the City’s intent to amend SDC Section 4.3-145. The notice was mailed more
than 35 days in advance of the first evidentiary hearing as required by ORS 197.610 (1).
#3. Notice of the public hearing concerning this matter was published on Monday, June 24, 2013
in the Eugene Register Guard, advertising a joint hearing before the Springfield and Lane
County Planning Commissions on July 16, 2013. A second publication was made on
September 26, 2013, announcing a hearing before the Springfield City Council and the Lane
County Board of Commissioners on October 17, 2013. The content of the notices followed
the direction given in Section 5.2-115 of the SDC for legislative actions.
#4. ORS 197.047(4) requires the local government to mail a notice to every landowner whose
property would be “rezoned” as a result of an amendment to planning policies that would
limit or prohibit land uses previously allowed in the affected zone. No properties will be
rezoned by the proposed adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
Attachment 1, Page 5 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 6
#5. The 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan does not change the allowed
uses on properties within Springfield’s planning jurisdiction. Mailed notice to landowners is
therefore not required under the provisions of ORS 197.047(4).
#6. On July 16, 2013, the Planning Commissions for the City of Springfield and Lane County
conducted a joint public hearing concerning the proposed 2012 Comprehensive Plan. No
testimony was offered in opposition to the Plan. The Springfield Planning Commission voted
unanimously to recommend Council of the Plan.
CRITERIA OF APPROVAL
The 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) is a refinement plan of the
Metro Plan. SDC Section 5.6-115 lists the criteria to be used in reaching a decision to adopt or amend
refinement plans. The Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Springfield City Council shall each
adopt findings that demonstrate conformance to the following:
(1) The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan)
(2) Applicable State statutes
(3) Applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules.
CRITERION #1: CONFORMANCE WITH THE METRO PLAN
Relevant findings and policies from the Metro Plan are summarized in italics, followed by findings of
fact in normal text.
The 2012 Plan meets the criteria as a Refinement Plan to the Metro Plan as follows:
Metro Plan Diagram/Land Use Designations
#7. The Metro Plan designation “Public and Semi-Public” includes a subcategory “Parks and Open
Space." The Parks and Open Space designation is the one relevant land use designation
related to the 2012 Plan:
“This designation includes existing publicly owned metropolitan and regional-scale parks and publicly
and privately owned golf courses and cemeteries in recognition of their role as visual open space.”
“In addition to those not shown at a neighborhood scale but automatically included in the gross
allocation of residential acres, there is a need for public facilities and open space at a non-local level,
such as regional/metropolitan parks. Several are shown on the Metro Plan Diagram.” (pg. II-G-9)
#8. Willamalane’s existing, metropolitan-scale parks appear on the Metro Plan Diagram with the
Parks and Open Space land use designation. These include Island Park, Willamalane Park,
and Lively Park1 (classified as community parks in the Refinement Plan); Dorris Ranch (special
1 The majority of Lively Park is designated Parks and Open Space. The northern portion is outside the
urban growth boundary and designated Agriculture. The Agriculture designation is appropriate for this
Attachment 1, Page 6 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 7
use park); Eastgate Woodlands (natural area park); and three sports parks, Guy Lee Park, Bob
Artz Park, and the Willamalane Sports Park at 32nd and Main Streets. Other existing, non-
metropolitan-scale parks do not consistently appear on the Plan Diagram because they
function at the neighborhood level, as the Metro Plan notes above.
#9. The 2012 Plan’s proposed new parks, facilities, and trails that are not already in public
ownership (see Maps 2-2 and 2-3 on pgs. 33 and 37 of the 2012 Plan) do not appear on the
Metro Plan Diagram, because the 2012 Plan does not intend to be specific as to their
locations. (The 2012 Plan maps depict only their approximate locations). If, in the future,
Willamalane develops metropolitan-scale parks or facilities on property with land use
designations not consistent with park use, plan amendment applications will be submitted
for land use designation changes at that time, as has been done in the past (most recently
with the 32nd Street Community Sports Park).
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Metro Plan Diagram and land use designations.
A. Residential Land Use and Housing Element
This element addresses the housing needs of current and future residents of the metropolitan area.
Relevant findings from the Metro Plan listed on page III-A-2 and following include:
Metro Plan Finding 4: There is sufficient buildable residential land within the existing UGB to meet
the future housing needs of the projected population …
Metro Plan Finding 5: Undeveloped residential land is considered unbuildable and removed from the
supply if it is within … the floodway, wetlands larger than 0.25 acres in Springfield or buffers around
Class A and B streams and ponds … Development potential is reduced in Springfield on floodplain
areas …
Metro Plan Finding 8: In the aggregate, non-residential land uses consume approximately 32
percent of buildable residential land. These non-residential uses include churches, day care centers,
parks, streets, schools, and neighborhood commercial.
Relevant policies include:
Policy A.3: Provide an adequate supply of buildable residential land within the UGB for the 20-year
planning period at the time of Periodic Review. (III-A-5)
#10. Springfield recently assessed its future need for residential land through the year 2030.
According to the Springfield Residential Land and Housing Needs Analysis, prepared by
ECONorthwest, Springfield has a 378 surplus of Low Density Residential land and a 76 acre
portion of the park because it is currently an unimproved area, and because any future improvements to
this area would be those allowable under the Agriculture designation, subject to special use permit from
Lane County.
Attachment 1, Page 7 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 8
surplus of Medium Density Residential land. The study showed that Springfield has a 28 acre
shortfall of High Density Residential land2.
#11. The ECONorthwest study also calculated the anticipated need for land designated Parks and
Open space through 2030 as part of its analysis. The analysis concluded that there is a 300
acre deficit of land designated Parks and Open Space. This need does not imply that the City
should expand the UGB for parks and open space. Statewide Planning Goal 8 allows cities
and park districts to acquire land for park uses outside of urban growth boundaries and
portions of the parkland need can be met on existing residential lands within the UGB
without creating an additional deficit (with the exception of the HDR plan designation which
already shows a land deficit)3.
Table S-5 from the ECONorthwest analysis summarizes its land needs analysis.
#12. Appendix A to the 2012 Plan includes an estimate of the needed acreage for park and
recreation through the year 2030. One of the key findings in the Community Needs
Assessment states:
“The proposed overall level of service standard for parkland is 14 acres per 1,000 residents.
This is the same standard that was used in the 2002 Community Needs Assessment. Based on
this standard, 160 additional acres of parkland are currently needed. By 2030, 364 additional
acres will be needed.”4
Conclusion: The projected deficit of 300 acres (ECONorthwest) or 364 acres (Appendix A, pg. 86 of the
2012 Plan) falls within the estimated surplus of buildable land remaining for residential use in
Springfield by 2030. Therefore, the 2012 Plan is consistent with the Residential Land Use and Housing
element of the Metro Plan.
2 Springfield Residential Land and Housing Needs Analysis, ECONorthwest, January 2011, pg.iv. 3 Springfield Residential Land and Housing Needs Analysis, ECONorthwest, January 2011, pg.iv.
4 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, October 2012, Appendix A, page 86.
Attachment 1, Page 8 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 9
B. Economic Element
The focus of this Metro Plan element is on broadening, improving, and diversifying the metropolitan
economy while maintaining or enhancing the environment (III-B-3). A relevant policy includes:
Policy 3: Encourage local residents to develop job skills and other educational attributes that will
enable them to fill existing job opportunities. (III-B-4)
#13. One of the goals of the 2012 Plan is to “support community economic development.” The
2012 Plan describes this goal by stating:
“Community health and vitality are essential to attract and retain employees and businesses
and to fuel the local economy. Diverse cultural and recreational opportunities appeal to
employers and employees. Willamalane Park and Recreation District will provide attractive
parks, facilities and programs to enhance quality of life in Springfield5.”
#14. The 2012 Plan as a whole embodies Willamalane’s strategies for building cultural and
recreational opportunities and the facilities needed to implement its stated goal of
supporting community economic development. These strategies for community and focus
on collaboration with the City and other partner agencies.
The Planning and Development Strategies listed on pg. 73 of the 2012 Plan illustrate this
collaboration. Strategy F8 in particular summarizes Willamalane’s commitment to
community development:
“F8. Continue collaboration with the city and other agencies in implementing community-
wide objectives, such as downtown and Glenwood redevelopment, planning for new
development, neighborhood refinement planning, and citywide planning for tourism, open
space, wetlands, stormwater, trails and bikeways, and other efforts focused on improving
quality of life.”6
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Economic Element of the Metro Plan.
C. Environmental Resources Element
The Environmental Resources Element addresses the natural assets and hazards in the metropolitan
area. There is significant correlation between the first two goals of this Metro Plan element and the
Comp Plan:
Goals
5 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, October 2012, pg. 11
6 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, October 2012, pg. 73
Attachment 1, Page 9 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 10
1. Protect valuable natural resources and encourage their wise management, use, and proper
reuse.
2. Maintain a variety of open spaces within and on the fringe of the developing area. (III-C-2)
The following Metro Plan policies relate to 2012 Plan goals, objectives, and strategies:
Policy C.5: Metropolitan goals relating to scenic quality … open space, and recreational potential
shall be given a higher priority than timber harvest within the urban growth boundary. (III-C-5)
Policy C.21: When planning for and regulating development, local governments shall consider the
need for protection of open spaces, including those characterized by significant vegetation and
wildlife. (III-C-12)
#15. Willamalane presently manages approximately 783 acres of land in 37 parks and three
undeveloped properties, including two parks classified as Natural Area Parks. “Environment”
and “Stewardship” are two of Willamalane’s Core Values (2012 Plan p. 8); the environment
core value is elaborated on in the text:
“Preserve the natural environment
Our community looks to us to be the stewards of our present and future natural resources.
Willamalane will provide leadership in conserving these resources, and look for new and
better ways to be environmentally responsible. Willamalane will provide parks and natural
areas that offer close-to-home access to recreational opportunities, while preserving and
enhancing important natural resources.” (2012 Plan pg. 11)
#16. Four of the strategies in the General Parks and Natural-Area Parks Strategies section of the
2012 Plan support the goals and policies found in the Environmental Resources Element of
the Metro Plan:
“A7. Work with interested parties to acquire and preserve natural areas for future
generations.” (2012 Plan pg. 27)
“A39. Acquire and develop a system of natural-area parks that protects, conserves and
enhances elements of the natural and historic landscape that give the region its unique sense
of place.” (2012 Plan pg. 39)
“A40. Develop comprehensive natural resource management plans for natural areas as a
basis for making acquisition, development and restoration decisions.” (2012 Plan pg. 39)
“A41. Provide opportunities for nature-based recreation, such as wildlife viewing, fishing,
hiking, bicycling, nature play, etc.” (2012 Plan pg. 39)
A42. Protect and enhance a variety of habitat types within Willamalane’s park and open
space system, including upland and wildlife communities such as oak savanna, wetlands,
upland prairie and riparian forest.” (2012 Plan pg. 39)
Attachment 1, Page 10 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 11
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Environmental Resources Element of the Metro Plan.
(For further substantiation please see the section in this report on Goal 5 -- Open Spaces, Scenic and
Historic Areas, and Natural Resources)
D. Willamette River Greenway, River Corridors, and Waterway Element
The goal of this element is to protect, conserve, and enhance the natural, scenic, environmental and
economic qualities of river and waterway corridors (III-D-3).
Relevant policies from this element include:
Policy D.2: Land use regulations and acquisition programs along river corridors and waterways shall
take into account all the concerns and needs of the community, including recreation … (III-D-4)
Policy D.3: Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County shall continue to cooperate in expanding water-
related parks and other facilities, where appropriate, that allow access to and enjoyment of river and
waterway corridors. (III-D-4)
Policy D.4: …Springfield’s efforts to improve the scenic quality of its Millrace should be encouraged.
(III-D-4)
Policy D.8: Within the framework of mandatory statewide planning goals, local Willamette River
Greenway plans shall allow a variety of means for public enjoyment of the river, including public
acquisition areas … (III-D-5)
Policy D.9: Local and state governments shall continue to provide adequate public access to the
Willamette River Greenway. (III-D-5)
#17. The Community Needs Assessment revealed the Springfield residents love their rivers. When
asked what types of outdoor recreation features are most needed in Willamalane’s parks,
riverfront access points tied for first. Many of Willamalane’s riverfront park facilities and
access points are along the Willamette River or include tributaries to the Willamette.
#18. The following projects and actions contained in the 2012 Plan support the goals and policies
found in the Metro Plan for the Willamette Greenway. These actions include:
“Action 5.4, Clearwater Park Master Plan Implementation: Over the planning period,
Willamalane will implement the improvements identified in the Draft Clearwater Park Master
Plan. Clearwater Park is located on the Middle Fork of the Willamette River, and has been
undergoing significant changes in the last few years, including development of the new inlet
for the Springfield Mill Race, and a new boat landing. Additional improvements identified in
the master plan include an accessible fishing pier, archery range, disc golf course, nature play
area, additional waterfront trails, and native plant demonstration garden. While most of the
improvements are not directly water-related, they will improve the value and use of this
large riverfront park.” (2012 Plan pg. 17)
Attachment 1, Page 11 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 12
“Action 4.11, McKenzie River Connector: Willamalane will work with the city on development
of a multiuse path from the existing McKenzie Levee Path to 52nd Street, between Hwy 126
and the McKenzie River. This project was previously identified in TransPlan and Willamalane’s
2004 Comprehensive Plan. It is a critical east-west connection north of Main Street for
bicyclists, and would open up access to the McKenzie River—much of which is hidden behind
fences, or only visible from speeding vehicles.” (2012 Plan pg. 17)
“Actions 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, Mill Race Path: These three actions combined would build the Mill
Race Path from the future Booth-Kelly Mill Pond Park in downtown Springfield, to its
connection with the Middle Fork Path in Georgia-Pacific Park. Together with the Middle Fork
Path and the on-street bikes lanes on South Second Street, Mill Race Path development
would make an 8-mile loop, the majority along a waterway. The Mill Race Ecosystem
Restoration Project has improved the habitat in and along the Mill Race, and the Mill Race
Path will open up this resource to Springfield residents and regional visitors alike, who until
then will only have minimal access to this historic waterway.” (2012 Plan pg. 17)
#19. In addition, the following actions have relevance to Metro Plan policies related to the
Willamette Greenway:
“A45. Protect riparian areas and floodplains along creeks and rivers within Willamalane’s
park and open space system.” (2012 Plan pg. 39)
“A48. Orient riverfront parks to the rivers and their natural resource values; support water-
related recreation activities where appropriate.” (2012 Plan pg. 39)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Willamette River Greenway, River Corridors, and
Waterway Element of the Metro Plan.
E. Environmental Design Element
The Goals of the Environmental Design Element are to:
1. Secure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment which is satisfying to the mind and senses.
2. Encourage the development of the natural, social, and economic environment in a manner that is
harmonious with our natural setting and maintains and enhances our quality of life.
3. Create and preserve desirable and distinctive qualities in local and neighborhood areas. (III-E-1)
Relevant Metro Plan policies include:
Policy 1: In order to promote the greatest possible degree of diversity, a broad variety of
commercial, residential, and recreational land uses shall be encouraged when consistent with other
planning policies.
Attachment 1, Page 12 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 13
Policy 4: Public and private facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that preserves and
enhances desirable features of local and neighborhood areas and promotes their sense of identity.
Policy 5: Carefully develop sites that provide visual diversity to the urban area and optimize their
visual and personal accessibility to residents. (III-E-3)
#20. The Environmental Design Element of the Metro Plan sets broad goals and policies for the
desired quality of life in the Metro area. Many of these goals and strategies hinge on the
collaboration and planning of private and public entities. In the context of the parks and
recreation, the following strategies from the 2012 Plan’s Planning and Development
Strategies section have relevance:
“F7. Emphasize coordination with TEAM Springfield and other agency partners when
developing new public resources, such as parks, schools and public spaces.” (2012 Plan pg.
73)
“F8. Continue collaboration with the city and other agencies in implementing
communitywide objectives, such as downtown and Glenwood redevelopment, planning for
new development, neighborhood refinement planning, and citywide planning for tourism,
open space, wetlands, stormwater, trails and bikeways, and other efforts focused on
improving quality of life.” (2012 Plan pg. 73)
“F10. Work with the city to assure Willamalane’s compliance with applicable statewide
planning goals.” (2012 Plan pg. 73)
“F14. Design future parks and community facilities to minimize their impacts on adjacent
development, including impacts of noise, traffic and lights.” (2012 Plan pg. 73)
“F15. Coordinate location and site design of parks and recreation facilities with schools, fire
stations, libraries and other public facilities where possible to effectively and efficiently
provide service.” (2012 Plan pg. 74)
“F16. Balance long-term, communitywide interest with the interests of neighborhoods and
individuals when planning the district’s park, recreation and open space system.” (2012 Plan
pg. 74)
“F20. Continue to involve the public in planning and design of parks and facilities.” (2012 Plan
pg. 74)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Environmental Design Element of the Metro Plan.
F. Transportation Element
The Transportation Element addresses surface and air transportation in the metropolitan area.
“TransPlan, the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan, provides the basis for the
surface transportation portions of this element …” (III-F-1). The first goal of the Transportation Element
is to:
Attachment 1, Page 13 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 14
Provide an integrated transportation and land use system that supports choices in modes of travel
and development patterns that will reduce reliance on the automobile and enhance livability,
economic opportunity, and the quality of life. (III-F-1)
The components of the Transportation Element that are most relevant to the 2012 Plan are the sections
on bicycle and pedestrian system improvements, such as:
Policy F.4: Require improvements that encourage transit, bicycles, and pedestrians in new
commercial, public, mixed use, and multi-unit residential development. (III-F-5)
Policy F.26: Provide for a pedestrian environment that is well integrated with adjacent land uses and
is designed to enhance the safety, comfort, and convenience of walking. (III-F-11)
#21. Significant effort was made in the 2012 Plan to be consistent with the bicycle and pedestrian
projects in TransPlan. On Map 7 of the 2012 Plan Appendix A, pg. 60 (Existing and Planned
Multiuse Paths and Bikeways), planned projects are those that appear in TransPlan. All
TransPlan off-street bicycle and pedestrian projects within the Willamalane planning area
appear as actions in the 2012 Plan in Table 4 (2012 Plan pg. 45-48).
Relevant strategies in the 2012 Plan include:
“A9. Look for opportunities to improve bicycle/pedestrian, vehicular and visual access at
existing parks in order to improve park safety, recreation utility and connectivity to the
surrounding neighborhood.” (2012 Plan pg. 27)
“A60. Work with partner agencies to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety, especially on
streets that connect to paths, parks and recreation facilities.” (2012 Plan pg. 45)
“F12. Work with Lane Transit District to provide convenient transit access to existing and
future district parks and recreation facilities.” (2012 Plan pg.73)
“F11. Work with appropriate agencies to integrate Willamalane’s pedestrian and bicycle
network with other city, metropolitan, and regional plans.” (2012 Plan pg. 73)
#22. Shown below are actions from Table 4 (page 48) of the 2012 Plan that are relevant to the
Transportation Element (numbers in brackets refer to the TransPlan project number):
Action 4.3a EWEB Bike Path Extension [731]
Action 4.5 Lyle Hatfield Path [759]
Action 4.16 Lower Millrace Path [840]
Action 4.17 Mill Race Connector Path [859]
Action 4.19 Middle Fork Willamette Path [21]
Conclusion: The 2012 is consistent with the Transportation Element of the Metro Plan.
Attachment 1, Page 14 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 15
G. Public Facilities and Services Element
This element provides direction for the future provision of urban facilities and services to planned land
uses within the Metro Plan boundary. Parks and recreation facilities and services are among those
discussed in the Element’s introductory section, but they are addressed more directly in the Parks and
Recreation Facilities Element. The one area of correlation in the Public Facilities and Services Element
relates to joint school/park use:
Metro Plan Finding 33: Combining educational facilities with local park and recreation facilities
provides financial benefits to the schools while enhancing benefits to the community. (III-G-10)
Metro Plan Policy G.22 d: The use of school facilities for non-school activities and appropriate
reimbursement for this use. (III-G-11)
#23. School District/Willamalane coordination is a key element in the 2012 Plan. The “Highlights
of Improvements—Collaboration” section of the 2012 Plan (pg. 14) expresses the importance
of Willamalane’s collaboration with other Springfield agencies. The following quotation from
that section describes the relationship between the park District and the School District:
“Willamalane proposes to expand and strengthen this partnership through a number of
strategies and actions. One strategy is to expand the number of school/park projects in order
to help meet Springfield’s neighborhood park needs. This collaboration may vary widely,
depending on mutual benefit and individual site constraints and opportunities. Possibilities
range from joint use to shared maintenance and coordinated master planning, such as at
Douglas Gardens school/park, Page school/park, and Maple Elementary.
In addition to existing school sites, this plan proposes jointly developing and co-locating a
school and neighborhood park to meet the educational needs of students and maximize
recreational opportunities in the growing Jasper-Natron area (Action 1.18, Jasper-Natron
School/Park). By working collaboratively, SPS and Willamalane will expand the quality and
quantity of recreation opportunities available, while minimizing costly land acquisition.”
(2012 Plan pg. 14)
#24. The following actions specified in the 2012 Plan further reinforce Willamalane’s commitment
to collaboration with the School District.
“A.15: Work with School District 19 when siting and developing future parks and schools to
create school/park facilities best suited to meet the community’s needs, where consistent
with the goals and standards of this Plan.” (2012 Plan pg.27)
“A23. Work with Springfield Public Schools to create school/park complexes where parks
abut schools and to optimize the use of other school sites, or former school sites, for public
recreation, especially in areas that are underserved by neighborhood parks.” (2012 Plan
pg.28)
Attachment 1, Page 15 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 16
#25. Table 1: Neighborhood Park Actions (2012 Plan pgs. 29-32) lists 11 current or proposed
school/park programs.
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Public Facilities and Services Element of the Metro
Plan.
H. Parks and Recreation Facilities Element
The goal of the Parks and Recreation Facilities Element is to provide a variety of parks and recreation
facilities to serve the diverse needs of the community’s citizens. (III-H-2)
Relevant Metro Plan policies include:
Metro Plan Policy H.2: Local parks and recreation plans and analyses shall be prepared by each
jurisdiction and coordinated on a metropolitan level… (III-H-4)
Metro Plan Policy H.6: All metropolitan area parks and recreation programs and districts shall
cooperate to the greatest possible extent in the acquisition of public and private funds to support
their operations. (III-H-4)
#26. Willamalane Park and Recreation District is a special district whose boundaries include all of
Springfield’s planning jurisdiction. The district boundary includes some land outside of the
Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. The City of Springfield has no park department.
Willamalane provides a variety of parks and recreational services to the citizens of
Springfield. The 2012 Plan is being adopted as Springfield’s comprehensive plan for park and
recreational services in conformance with both the Metro Plan and the Statewide Planning
Goal 8.
#27. The Willamalane 2012 Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (2012 Plan) is the product of
extensive public participation and interagency collaboration. Interagency coordination and
collaboration in is at the center of the 2012 Plan’s strategy for implementation.
“Collaboration” is highlighted as one of Willamalane’s highest priorities. The 2012 Plan
states:
“One of the Comprehensive Plan’s goals is to strengthen and develop community
partnerships. Willamalane recognizes the importance of collaboration in maximizing
resources and delivering the greatest benefit to the community. In this plan, Willamalane will
continue to rely on collaboration to meet community needs. Willamalane is an important
partner in TEAM Springfield, a cooperative effort between City of Springfield, Springfield
Public Schools (SPS), Willamalane, and Springfield Utility Board (SUB).
Willamalane relies on all TEAM Springfield partners to meet community park and recreation
needs, but particularly with SPS. Elementary schools play a critical role in meeting day-to-day
park needs in Springfield, especially in those areas underserved by neighborhood parks.
Willamalane and SPS also have a history of collaborating to ensure that all Springfield
Attachment 1, Page 16 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 17
children have safe, supervised settings for play and learning after school and on no-school
days.”(2012 Plan pg. 14)
#28. The 2012 Plan section, “Planning and Development Strategies” (pg. 73-74) lists several
strategies that are relevant to the Park and Recreation policies discussed here. These
strategies are cited in Finding #19 as part of the Environmental Design Element.
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Parks and Recreation Facilities Element of the Metro
Plan.
I. Historic Preservation Element
The goal of the Historic Preservation Element of the Metro Plan is to preserve and restore reminders of
our origin and historic development as links between past, present, and future generations (III-I-1).
Relevant Metro Plan policies include:
Metro Plan Policy 2: Institute and support projects and programs that increase citizen and visitor
awareness of the area’s history and encourage citizen participation in and support of programs
designed to recognize and memorialize the area’s history (III-I-2)
Willamalane owns and operates Dorris Ranch, a 258-acre living history park on the National Register of
Historic Places. Relevant strategies in the 2012 Plan include:
“ A60: Provide special-use parks that support specific recreation activities, and/or that have unique
features, such as viewpoints, boating and fishing facilities, scenic areas, and historic sites.” (2012
Plan pg. 51)
“A61: Work with partner agencies, such as the City of Springfield and Lane County, to protect and
enhance important scenic and historic sites.” (2012 Plan pg. 51)
“A63: Develop and manage Dorris Ranch as a unique, historic natural area and recreational
resource.” (2012 Plan pg. 51)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Historic Preservation Element of the Metro Plan.
J. Energy Element
The first goal of the Energy Element of the Metro Plan is to maximize the conservation and efficient
utilization of all types of energy (III-J-3). There is one policy relevant to the 2012 Plan:
Metro Plan Policy 8: Commercial, residential, and recreational land uses shall be integrated to the
greatest extent possible, balanced with all planning policies to reduce travel distances, optimize
reuse of waste heat, and optimize potential on-site energy generation. (III-J-5)
The 2012 Plan has one action that is most relevant to the Energy Element:
Attachment 1, Page 17 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 18
Table 9, Action 9.3 (Energy Efficiency Program): Develop energy-efficiency programs at District
facilities to minimize consumption and utility costs. (2012 Plan pg. 69)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Energy Element of the Metro Plan.
K. Citizen Involvement Element
The goal of the Citizen Involvement Element of the Metro Plan is to continue to develop, maintain, and
refine programs and procedures that maximize the opportunity for meaningful, ongoing citizen
involvement in the community’s planning and planning implementation processes consistent with
mandatory statewide planning standards. (III-K-2, 3)
The following Citizen Involvement Element policy is relevant to the 2012 Plan:
Metro Plan Policy 3: Improve and maintain local mechanisms that provide the opportunity for
residents and property owners in existing residential areas to participate in the implementation of
policies in the Plan that may affect the character of those areas. (III-K-3)
#29. With regard to Citizen Involvement, the 2012 Plan (pg. 3) states: “Community involvement
was a critical part of the Community Needs Assessment. Feedback was solicited from district
stakeholders and residents regarding their needs and preferences related to parks, natural
areas, recreation facilities and programs over the next 20 years. Activities were planned to
ensure the participation of a diverse cross-section of the population. Community
involvement activities included the following:
• July 2010: A Comprehensive Plan booth at Springfield SummerFair (316 participants
completed a questionnaire, and over 600 children voted for their favorite park
activity);
• September-October 2010: An on-line and print Community Survey (completed by
approximately 1,060 people);
• October 2010: A Spanish-language version of the Community Survey (completed by
approximately 31 people); and
• January 2011: Three Teen Workshops (with approximately 77 participants).
Over 2,000 participants were included in the planning process, including children and youth.
In addition, the Spring 2010 Recreation Survey included input from 728 residents.” (2012
Plan pg. 3)
#30. The 2012 plan lists several strategies that are the most relevant to the Citizen Involvement
Element:
“F20. Continue to involve the public in planning and design of parks and facilities…
Attachment 1, Page 18 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 19
F23. Continue to promote volunteerism to involve individuals, groups, and businesses in the
planning, design, operation, and programming of parks and recreation facilities…
F26. Increase efforts to inform residents about the benefits of parks and recreation and the
value of district natural, historic and recreation resources.
F27. Emphasize inclusivity and ethnic diversity in district communications, programs, and
policies.
F28. Increase efforts to inform Spanish-speaking residents of district programs and services.”
(2012 Plan pg. 74)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the Citizen Involvement Element of the Metro Plan.
CRITERION #2: APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES
Applicable state statutes are those authorizing and implementing the state and local park planning
administrative rule, and those allowing park uses in exclusive farm use zones.
Authorizing statutes for Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) Chapter 660, Division 034, State and Local
Park Planning, are Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 183, ORS Chapter 195, and ORS Chapter 197
Statutes implemented by OAR Chapter 660, Division 034, State and Local Park Planning, are the
following:
ORS Chapter 195 (Local Government Planning Coordination) section 120 (Rules and planning goal
amendments for parks required; allowable uses; application of certain land use laws) through
section 125 (Existing uses in state parks; approval by local governments);
ORS Chapter 197 (Comprehensive Land Use Planning Coordination), Section 040 (Land Conservation
and Development Commission -- Duties of Commission; rules); and section 225 (Goals Compliance –
Preparation; adoption) through section 245 (Commission amendment of initial goals; adoption of
new goals); and
ORS Chapter 215 (County Planning; Zoning; Housing Codes), section 213 (Uses permitted in exclusive
farm use zones in counties that adopted marginal lands system prior to 1993)
The discussion and findings in the preceding section of this report demonstrate that the 2012 Plan
conforms with the Metro Plan. The following section includes discussion and findings demonstrating
conformance with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and administrative rules. Since the Metro Plan,
the Goals and the administrative rules all specifically implement the authorizing statutes; therefore,
these findings also demonstrate that the 2012 Plan conforms to applicable state statutes.
CRITERION #3: APPLICABLE STATE-WIDE PLANNING GOALS AND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
Attachment 1, Page 19 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 20
STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
Statewide planning goals are written in bold, and relevant approval criteria is summarized in italics,
followed by findings of fact in normal text.
Goal 1 – Citizen Involvement
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases of the planning process.
#31. Requirements under Goal 1 are met by adherence to the citizen involvement processes
required by the Metro Plan and implemented by the Springfield Development Code Sections
5.14-100 and 5.2-100 and by noticed public hearings prior to final adoption by the Lane
County Board of County Commissioners and Springfield City Council. The finding under the
Metro Plan Citizen Involvement Element provides additional details on the Citizen
Involvement efforts for the 2012 Plan that ensures compliance with Statewide Planning Goal
1.
#32. With regard to Citizen Involvement, the 2012 Plan states: “Community involvement was a
critical part of the Community Needs Assessment. Feedback was solicited from district
stakeholders and residents regarding their needs and preferences related to parks, natural
areas, recreation facilities and programs over the next 20 years. Activities were planned to
ensure the participation of a diverse cross-section of the population. Community
involvement activities included the following:
• July 2010: A Comprehensive Plan booth at Springfield SummerFair (316 participants
completed a questionnaire, and over 600 children voted for their favorite park
activity);
• September-October 2010: An on-line and print Community Survey (completed by
approximately 1,060 people);
• October 2010: A Spanish-language version of the Community Survey (completed by
approximately 31 people); and
• January 2011: Three Teen Workshops (with approximately 77 participants).
Over 2,000 participants were included in the planning process, including children and youth.
In addition, the Spring 2010 Recreation Survey included input from 728 residents.” (2012
Plan pg. 3)
#33. The 2012 Plan lists several strategies that are the most relevant to the Citizen Involvement
Element:
“F20. Continue to involve the public in planning and design of parks and facilities…
F23. Continue to promote volunteerism to involve individuals, groups, and businesses in the
planning, design, operation, and programming of parks and recreation facilities…
Attachment 1, Page 20 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 21
F26. Increase efforts to inform residents about the benefits of parks and recreation and the
value of district natural, historic and recreation resources.
F27. Emphasize inclusivity and ethnic diversity in district communications, programs, and
policies.
F28. Increase efforts to inform Spanish-speaking residents of district programs and services.”
(2012 Plan pg. 74)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan meets and exceeds the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 2
Goal 2 – Land Use Planning
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decision and
actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and
actions.
Goal 2 focuses on the requirements for developing and adopting local land use plans. Willamalane
underwent a deliberate and thorough process of updating the 2012 Plan in accordance with the
IGA Regarding Coordinated Planning and Urban Services with the City of Springfield and its
approved Citizen Involvement Program, in order to ensure compliance with the Metro Plan and
Goal 2.
#34. The first element of Willamalane’s comprehensive planning process was the development of
the Community Needs Assessment (CNA). The CNA process included a wide-range of
community involvement opportunities as well as technical analysis of facilities, programs,
and finances. Part of the technical analysis included a detailed inventory of parks and
facilities, a demographic analysis, community profile, and summary of related planning
efforts.
The findings of the CNA were the foundation of the 2012 Plan’s Strategies and Actions
section (Chapter 4). The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) in Chapter 5 details a three-phase
implementation strategy, with cost estimates and funding projections developed for phases
one and two of the Comprehensive Plan. The projects included in the CIP are derived from
the Action Tables in Chapter 4. The 2012 Plan includes an identified action (11.17 on page
76) which commits to “assess community needs and update the district’s Park and
Recreation Comprehensive Plan every 5-10 years to respond to changing needs.”
#35. The Draft 2012 Plan was completed in early September 2012. On June 14, Willamalane held
an Open House for the public to review the work to date on the 2012 Plan. Approximately
100 people attended, and 64 questionnaires were completed. The Willamalane Board of
Directors reviewed the Draft Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan on July 25. Staff
received additional input from project partners the city of Springfield and Lane County in
September and made final changes to the plan.
Attachment 1, Page 21 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 22
#36. The general public was able to review copies of the Draft Plan at the Willamalane
Administration Center and on the Willamalane Web Site (www.willamalane.org).
In response to the input received from the public and community officials, changes were made to the
Draft Plan in early October 2012. The Willamalane Web Site was updated with the final draft of the
2012 Plan. On October 10, 2004 the Willamalane Board of Directors held a public hearing and approved
the 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan.
Notice of the intent to adopt the 2012 Plan was sent to Department of Land Conservation and
Development on June 4, 2013. A joint public hearing with the Springfield and Lane County Planning
Commissions was held on July 16, 2013. The Springfield City Council and the Board of County
Commissioners are tentatively scheduled to conduct a joint public hearing on October 17, 2013 to adopt
the 2012 Plan.
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan meets and exceeds the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 2.
Goal 3 – Agricultural Lands
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands.
#37. This goal does not apply within adopted, acknowledged urban growth boundaries. The City of
Springfield does not have any agricultural zoning districts. Outside of the urban growth
boundary, within the Metro Plan boundary, there are four existing Willamalane properties
that are partially designated as agriculture in the Metro Plan. OAR 660-034-0040 addresses
local park use on agricultural land. By reference, this administrative rule lists a number of
uses that may occur on parks located on agricultural land, including but not limited to picnic
shelters, play structures, recreational trails and interpretive facilities (OAR 660-034-0035).
The rule provides that a local government is not required to adopt an exception to Statewide
Planning Goals 3 or 4 for [these uses] on agricultural or forest land within a local park
provided such uses, alone or in combination, meet all other statewide goals and [are]
described and authorized in a local park master plan that has been adopted as part of the
local comprehensive plan (OAR 660-034-0040(4) (a)).
Proposed uses for these sites are described in the 2012 Plan in Chapter 4, Strategies and
Actions:
Project 2.5 Lively Park Development (2012 Plan, pg. 36)
Project 2.6 Lively Park/ Springfield School District Coordination (2012 Plan, pg. 36)
Project 3.3 Georgia-Pacific Natural Area Park (2012 Plan, pg. 40)
Project 5.7 Wallace M. Ruff Jr. Memorial Park (2012 Plan, pg. 52)
Project 3.1 Harvest Landing (2012 Plan, pg. 36)
Conclusion: These uses are consistent with those allowed on agricultural land; therefore no goal
exception is necessary. The 2012 Plan meets the requirements for Statewide Planning Goal 3,
Agricultural Lands.
Goal 4 – Forest Lands
Attachment 1, Page 22 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 23
To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state’s forest
economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous
growing and harvesting of forest tree species as the leading use on forest land consistent with
sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for
recreational opportunities and agriculture.
#38. This goal does not apply within adopted, acknowledged urban growth boundaries. The City
of Springfield does not have any forest zoning districts. Willamalane does not have any
current or proposed parks or facilities with a Forest Land designation in the Metro Plan;
therefore Statewide Planning Goal 4 does not apply.
Goal 5 – Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources
To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources.
This goal focuses on the resources that need to be inventoried by local governments in order to “adopt
programs that will protect natural resources and conserve scenic, historic, and open space resources
for present and future generations.”
#39. The Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Willamalane and City of Springfield states,
the “District shall be responsible for preparing, maintaining and updating a comprehensive
parks, recreation and open space refinement plan for the area within its boundaries,
including the City of Springfield and adjacent urbanizable area, for the purposes of meeting
statewide Planning Goal 8 requirements and ensuring long-range public parks, recreation,
and open space facilities/services.”
#40. As the IGA directs, Willamalane’s responsibility is in meeting Goal 8 requirements. The City
of Springfield is responsible for meeting Goal 5 requirements. However, recreation-related
open spaces are addressed in the Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, per the direction
of the Metro Plan.
#41. The Metro Plan notes in the Environmental Resources Element (III-C-1), “open space can also
be a park … examples of regional Parks (sic) that provide significant public open space areas
for metropolitan residents include … Willamalane Park and Recreation District’s Clearwater
Park, Eastgate Woodlands, and Dorris Ranch.” The Metro Plan goes on to acknowledge later
in the Environmental Resources Element (III-C-5) “open space provides many benefits in an
urban area, including …provision of recreation opportunities.”
#42. Springfield Natural Resources Special Study, adopted in 2005, includes an inventory locally
significant upland, riparian and wetland resource sites. A number of Willamalane’s existing
park sites are included on that inventory, including Dorris Ranch, Willamette Heights, and the
Eastgate Woodlands. The development of natural area park facilities is subject to the Goal 5
program of protection. These protection measures allow for limited recreational use
including, but not limited to multi-use paths and low impact passive recreation.
Attachment 1, Page 23 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 24
#43. Two of Willamalane’s core values are “Environment” and “Stewardship” (2012 Plan pg. 9)
listed in Chapter Two of the 2012 Plan. Willamalane elaborated on these relevant core
values in the two supporting Plan Goals shown below:
• Provide opportunities to enjoy nature--Willamalane's parks, programs and facilities offer
unique opportunities to enjoy nature, view wildlife and develop a sense of well-being that
grows from a deep relationship with nature and a connection to the natural world. (2012
Plan pg. 10)
• Preserve the natural environment--Our community looks to Willamalane to be stewards
of our natural resources. Willamalane will provide leadership in conserving these resources,
and look for new and better ways to be environmentally responsible. Willamalane will
provide parks and natural areas that offer close-to-home access to recreational
opportunities, while preserving and enhancing important natural resources. (2012 Plan pg.
11)
#44. The 2012 Plan distinguishes “General Parks” from “Natural Area Parks.” Natural Area Parks
include natural areas, linear parks and trails that are intended to enhance the livability and
character of a community by preserving habitat and open space. Natural areas also provide
opportunities for passive outdoor recreation, such as hiking and wildlife viewing. Chapter 4
of the Plan (2012 Plan pgs. 39-40) includes a list of “Natural Area Parks Strategies.” These
strategies are relevant to Goal 5:
“A39. Acquire and develop a system of natural-area parks that protects, conserves and
enhances elements of the natural and historic landscape that give the region its unique
sense of place.
A40. Develop comprehensive natural resource management plans for natural areas as a
basis for making acquisition, development and restoration decisions.
A41. Provide opportunities for nature-based recreation, such as wildlife viewing, fishing,
hiking, bicycling, nature play, etc.
A42. Protect and enhance a variety of habitat types within Willamalane’s park and open
space system, including upland and wildlife communities such as oak savanna, wetlands,
upland prairie and riparian forest.
A43. Work with others, as appropriate, to acquire significant natural areas. Priorities include
sites that: are large; provide uninterrupted corridors that link parks, schools, habitats and
natural-resource areas; have high outdoor recreation potential; serve as greenbelts or urban
buffers; protect water resources; and provide significant views.
A44. Work with other agencies and providers to support conservation and acquisition of
nearby key regional natural-resource areas, consistent with the Rivers to Ridges
Metropolitan Regional Parks and Open Space Study.
Attachment 1, Page 24 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 25
A45. Protect riparian areas and floodplains along creeks and rivers within Willamalane’s
park and open space system.
A46. Explore the feasibility of a wetland mitigation banking program at district park sites.
A47. Work with other agencies and providers to encourage the development of appropriate
recreation amenities in nearby natural areas where appropriate.
A48. Orient riverfront parks to the rivers and their natural resource values; support water
related recreation activities where appropriate.
A49. Acquire, develop and manage parks and facilities to protect and enhance wetlands,
waterways and water quality, and to take advantage of their natural amenities and
recreation values.
A50. Incorporate natural resource enhancement into plans for park and facility development
where appropriate.
A51. Work with the city and developers to coordinate park and open space planning with
planning for stormwater, wetlands mitigation/protection, multipurpose trails and natural
resource conservation, as appropriate.
A52. Continue to participate in the TEAM Springfield-sponsored Mill Race Ecosystem
Restoration Project, representing public recreation and education interests.”
Conclusion: The connection between the purpose of Goal 5 and the core values and the Natural Area
Parks Strategies expressed in the 2012 Plan are mutually supportive and in many instances overlap.
The section in this report concerning the Metro Plan Environmental Resources Element describes in
detail how the 2012 Plan meets and exceeds the requirements for that element and Statewide
Planning Goal 5.
Goal 6 – Air, Water and Land Resources Quality
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state.
This goal is primarily concerned with compliance with federal and state environmental quality statutes,
and how this compliance is achieved as development proceeds in relationship to air sheds, river basins
and land resources.
#45. The 2012 Plan lists strategies for protecting air, water and land resources in the context of
General Park and Natural Area Park management. Three of these strategies are most
relevant to Goal 6:
A16. Coordinate with the city on implementing stormwater Best Management Practices to
assist in meeting state and federal water-quality standards and Endangered Species Act
requirements. (2012 Plan Pg. 27)
Attachment 1, Page 25 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 26
A51. Work with the city and developers to coordinate park and open space planning with
planning for stormwater, wetlands mitigation/protection, multipurpose trails and natural
resource conservation, as appropriate. (2012 Plan Pg. 39)
F9. Continue collaboration with the city and other agencies in implementing communitywide
objectives, such as downtown and Glenwood redevelopment, planning for new
development, neighborhood refinement planning, and citywide planning for tourism, open
space, wetlands, stormwater, trails and bikeways, and other efforts focused on improving
quality of life. (2012 Plan Pg. 73)
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan meets the requirements for Statewide Planning Goal 6.
Goal 7 – Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards
To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.
The focus of this goal is on natural hazard comprehensive planning, implementation, and coordination.
Conclusion: This goal does not apply to the 2012 Plan.
Goal 8 – Recreational Needs
To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where
appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination
resorts.
Goal 8 states that recreational needs, “now and in the future, shall be planned for by governmental agencies having responsibility for recreation areas, facilities and opportunities: (1) in coordination with private enterprise; (2) in appropriate proportions; and (3) in such quantity, quality and locations as is consistent with the availability of the resources to meet such requirements.”
“(1) in coordination with private enterprise;”
#46. Chapter 3 of the 2012 Plan discusses the importance of collaboration with public agencies and with the private sector “to promote community economic development and leverage public funds with private dollars (2012 Plan pg. 14).” The following projects are identified actions listed in the 2012 Plan that illustrate the importance of collaboration with the private sector to provide needed park and recreation services and facilities: “Action 1.3, Pacific Park Subdivision Neighborhood Park is cited as an example of how Willamalane proposes to work with the city and property owners of the Pacific Park subdivision to acquire and develop a neighborhood park for area residents. The existing privately owned park is run-down and beyond repair. Willamalane pledges to continue partnerships with both public and private sectors to maximize the benefits delivered to residents for each dollar of public investment.” (2012 Plan pg. 14) “Actions 4.13 and 4.14, Glenwood Riverfront Linear Park A and B: As the Glenwood area of
Springfield is redeveloped, Willamalane has an opportunity to work with public and private
Attachment 1, Page 26 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 27
partners to develop a riverfront linear park and multiuse path, and expand the popular
Willamette River path system.” (2012 Plan pg. 15)
“Action 1.26, Glenwood Neighborhood Park Blocks: Willamalane intends to work in
collaboration with the city and private partners to pursue development of neighborhood park
blocks in Glenwood.” (2012 Plan pg. 15)
“(2) in appropriate proportions; and (3) in such quantity, quality and locations as is consistent with the
availability of the resources to meet such requirements.”
#47. The Community Needs Assessment (CNA), found in Appendix A of the 2012 Plan, includes a
park and facility analysis to document the type, number, and condition of parks and
recreation facilities available to District residents today and the analyzed the ratio of facilities
to population (current level of service), assess current and future needs. This analysis
provided a basis for the development of Chapter 4 Strategies and Actions sections of the
plan. (2012 Plan pg. 22)
#48. The CNA used a variety of methods to assess current and future park and recreation facility
needs: • Public Involvement Activities: A comprehensive public involvement program involved
over 2,000 people, including children and youth, in assessing needs (Appendix A pgs. 17-
21).
• Park and Facility Analysis: District parks, community recreation facilities, and indoor
and outdoor recreation facilities were inventoried and analyzed (2012 Plan Appendix A
pgs. 23-89, Table 8, pg. 69). All District parks and facilities were visited, and input from
key staff was gathered to assess their current condition and develop an understanding of
the system of parks and facilities available to residents. The Park and Facility Assessment
is included in (2012 Plan Appendix A pgs. 83-87).
• Geographic Distribution Analysis: Maps were created to illustrate current park,
recreation and open space resources and their distribution throughout the planning area
(Appendix A, Map 3, pg. 27).
• Standards Analysis: Standards are minimum - not maximum - goals for service. To
establish standards for Willamalane, the current level of service provided was compared
to standards of other agencies and historic NRPA standards. Community demand was
considered and standards for Willamalane were proposed for both parkland (Appendix A
Table 5, pg. 31) and recreational facilities (Appendix A Table 10, 79).
Conclusion: A thorough and deliberate process was used to develop and adopt the 2012 Plan, which
meets and exceeds the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 8. (For further substantiation please
see Findings #25-#27 in the section in this report concerning the Metro Plan Parks and Recreation
Facilities Element, (pg. 15 of this report).
Goal 9 – Economic Development
Attachment 1, Page 27 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 28
To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities
vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens.
This goal is intended to address the land use needs (inventory) for employment opportunities in
commercial and industrial sites, and correlates with one of the goals in the 2012 Plan, which is to
“Support community economic development” (2012 Plan pg. 11).
#49. “Support community economic development” is one of the listed goals of the 2012 Plan. The Plan states: Community health and vitality are essential to attract and retain employees and businesses and to fuel the local economy. Diverse cultural and recreational opportunities appeal to employers and employees. Willamalane Park and Recreation District will provide attractive parks, facilities and programs to enhance quality of life in Springfield.
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan does not affect commercial or industrial lands inventories, nor does it limit
access or other services to such sites. It recognizes the role of recreational services and facilities as a
support for community efforts to retain businesses and employees and attract new businesses to the
area. The 2012 Plan is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 9.
Goal 10 – Housing
To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state.
Similar to Goal 9, this goal is intended to protect residential lands inventories and require
implementation measures that promote housing opportunities in a variety of economic ranges and
densities. Please see the section in this report concerning the Metro Plan Residential Land Use and
Housing Element for the detailed explanation of why the 2012 Plan (pgs.6-8) will not negatively affect
the residential land inventory.
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with the purpose of Statewide Planning Goal 10.
Goal 11 – Public Facilities and Services
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development.
Conclusion: The emphasis of this goal is on key urban services other than parks and recreation, and
the focus is on the need for a 20-year public facilities and services plan (PFSP). Please see the section
in this report concerning the Metro Plan Public Utilities, Services, and Facilities Element (pgs. 13-
14)for the detailed explanation of why the 2012 Plan is consistent with that Element and, therefore,
Statewide Goal 11.
Goal 12 - Transportation
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system.
Conclusion: The focus of this goal is on the development of a transportation plan. TransPlan is the
adopted metropolitan-area transportation plan. Please see the section of this report on the Metro
Attachment 1, Page 28 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 29
Plan Transportation Element (pg.13-14) for the detailed explanation of why the 2012 Plan is
consistent with TransPlan, and therefore consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 12.
Goal 13 – Energy Conservation
To conserve energy.
Conclusion: This goal is intended to require local jurisdictions to include energy consequences during
decision-making. The 2012 Plan calls for “Develop[ing] energy-efficiency programs at District facilities
to minimize consumption and utilities costs (Table 9, p. 69, Project/Action 9.3). The Metro Plan
Energy Element provides a detailed explanation of why the 2012 Plan is consistent with that Element,
and therefore consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 13.
Goal 14 – Urbanization
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use.
The focus of this goal is on urban growth boundaries, their establishment and change, and to a lesser
degree, the treatment of land within and outside of urban growth boundaries.
The Willamalane Park and Recreation District is designated in the Metro Plan as the park and recreation
service provider for Springfield and its urbanizable area, including Glenwood. The current District
boundary includes the area within Springfield’s city limits, as well as areas outside of the city limits and
within the urban growth boundary (UGB). Any newly developed areas annexed by the City of Springfield
are automatically annexed to the District.
The planning area for the proposed 2012 Plan includes the area of potential development over the next
20 years, and therefore, it is broader than the current District boundary. The planning area generally
covers the entire area within the Springfield UGB or the District Boundary, whichever is greater, and
properties owned by Willamalane Park and Recreation District within the Metro Plan Boundary.
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan will not hasten, slow down or otherwise influence the transition of rural
land to urban land use, therefore it is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 14.
Goal 15 – Willamette River Greenway
To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural,
economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River as the Willamette
River Greenway.
Conclusion: Willamalane Park and Recreation District has a number of current and proposed parks
and properties within the Willamette River Greenway. Please see the section in this report
concerning the Metro Plan Willamette River Greenway, River Corridors and Waterways (pgs. 10-12 of
this report) for the detailed explanation of why the 2012 Plan is consistent with that element, and
therefore consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 15.
Attachment 1, Page 29 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 30
Goal 16 Estuarine Resources, Goal 17 Coastal Shorelands, Goal 18 Beaches and Dunes, and Goal 19
Ocean Resources
These statewide planning goals do not apply to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area.
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
Applicable administrative rules are those establishing policies and procedures for the planning and
zoning of state and local parks in order to address the recreational needs of the citizens of the state
(OAR Chapter 660, Division 034, Section 0000), and secondarily, those implementing the requirements
for agricultural land as defined by Goal 3 (OAR Chapter 660, Division 33, Section 0010), and those
implementing the requirements for open space as defined by Goal 5 (OAR Chapter 660, Division 023,
Section 0220).
OAR 660-034-0040(1) refers to requirements for implementing “local park master plans” as part of the
local comprehensive plan. There is no definition for “local park master plans” in Division 34. In
preparing the 2004 Plan, staff spoke with Bob Rindy at DLCD for clarification. According to Mr. Rindy,
language referring to “local park master plans” and “local park plans” pertain to site-specific park master
plans (i.e., a master plan for a new or existing park), not for community-wide park and recreation
comprehensive plans, such as the 2012 Plan. Sections (1)(a) and (1)(b) of 660-034-0040 only apply if one
is adopting a site-specific park master plan.
Conclusion: Since the 2012 Plan is a comprehensive, system-wide plan for parks and recreation, and
not a site-specific park master plan, the rule does not apply.
If one assumes that the 2012 Plan is synonymous with the definition of a “local park master plan” in
Division 34, the 2012 Plan is consistent with the intent of the Rule. The relevant text is below:
(1) … If a local government decides to adopt a local park plan as part of the local comprehensive
plan, the adoption shall include:
(a) A plan map designation, as necessary, to indicate the location and boundaries of the local park;
and
A plan map designation is not necessary for proposed parks, as they are not site-specific and are not
necessarily metropolitan-scale. As discussed in the section in this report concerning the Metro Plan
Diagram/Land Use Designations (pg. 6), it is consistent that the 2012 Plan’s proposed parks, facilities,
and trails that are not already in public ownership do not appear on the Metro Plan Diagram, because
those proposed parks, facilities and trails are not site-specific. If, in the future, Willamalane develops
metropolitan-scale parks or facilities on property with land use designations not consistent with park
use, plan amendment applications will be submitted for land use designation changes at that time, as
we have done in the past (most recently with the 32nd Street Sports Park). Existing land use designations
are consistent with the Metro Plan. Division 34 continues:
Attachment 1, Page 30 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 31
(b) Appropriate zoning categories and map designations (a “local park” zone or overlay zone is
recommended), including objective land use and siting review criteria, in order to authorize the
existing and planned park uses described in the local park master plan. (OAR 660-034-0040(1)(a)(b))
Existing City of Springfield zoning categories and Metro Plan map designations are sufficient, as they
relate to existing parks and facilities, not proposed projects. Community Needs Assessment Appendix
A-1 “Park and Facility Classifications and Definitions” in the 2012 Plan provides information that may be
used as objective siting review criteria when developing proposed parks and facilities in the future.
The rule also provides that “a local government is not required to adopt an exception to
Statewide Planning Goals 3 or 4 for [these uses] on agricultural or forest land within a local park
provided such uses, alone or in combination, meet all other statewide goals and are each use
must be described and authorized in a local park master plan” that has been adopted as part of
the local comprehensive plan (OAR 660-034-0040(4) (a)).
Conclusion: The 2012 Plan is consistent with this rule. Please see the discussion in the section of this
report on Statewide Planning Goal 3 – Agricultural Lands (pg. 21).
Lastly, OAR 660-023-0220 defines “open space” to include parks. It allows local governments to
“adopt a list of significant open space resource sites as an open space acquisition program. Local
governments are not required to apply the requirements of OAR 660-023-0030 through 660-023-
0050 [Inventory Process] to such sites unless land use regulations are adopted to protect such sites
prior to acquisition.” (OAR 660-023-0220(3))
Conclusion: Map 2-3 (2012 Plan pg. 43) Proposed Natural Area Park Projects in the 2012 Plan shows
the general location of future natural area park facilities. Some of those sites are not yet in public
ownership and their location is general in nature. There are no land use regulations being proposed
to protect such sites prior to acquisition. Therefore, the 2012 Plan is consistent with this rule.
CONCLUSION
Willamalane Park and Recreation District is designated in the Metro Plan as the park and recreation
service provider for Springfield and its urbanizable area. A 1995 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)
between the City and Willamalane requires the two agencies to collaborate in planning for parks,
recreation and open space. The IGA designates Willamalane as the agency responsible for preparing
and updating a park and recreation comprehensive plan, and it specifies that the comprehensive plan
shall be adopted as a refinement plan to the Metro Plan.
Willamalane initiated the 2012 Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan planning process with the
Community Needs Assessment in June of 2010. The CNA identifies future needs for parks, open space,
recreation facilities, programs, and services within the Springfield area. The 2012 Plan responds to
identified community needs and provides an action plan to ensure the most effective use of community
resources. Strategies and actions were developed with input from a broad spectrum of community
members, through such means as an online and printed community survey in English and Spanish that
was completed by more than 1000 citizens, a Springfield SummerFest booth visited by more than 900
citizens, Teen workshops, and public meetings. Input was also received throughout the planning
process from elected and appointed officials, including members of the Springfield School District,
Attachment 1, Page 31 of 32
2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan
TYP413-00003
October 17, 2013 Page 32
Springfield City Council and Planning Commission, Lane County Board of Commissioners and Planning
Commission, and the Willamalane Board of Directors.
Staff has compared the 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan and the process
used to develop it against the approval criteria for making refinement plan amendments found in
Section 5.6-115 of the Springfield Development Code. It is the opinion of staff that the 2012 Plan meets
or exceeds the applicable criteria with respect to consistency with the Metro Plan, applicable state
statutes, and applicable Statewide Planning goals and administrative rules.
The findings contained in this report provide a substantive basis for Springfield City Council to approve
the proposed 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan.
Attachment 1, Page 32 of 32
Park and RecreationComprehensive Plan OCTOBER2012
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 1
Appendix A
Community Needs Assessment
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 1
Attachment 4, Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2012 WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS A REFINEMENT PLAN OF THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD
METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) FOR APPLICATION WITHIN THE
AREA OF PLANNING JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND ADOPTING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield relies on the Willamalane Park and Recreation
District (Willamalane) for the provision of park and recreation services, sites,
maintenance, acquisition, development, programs, administration and Board of
Directors oversight; and
WHEREAS, Chapter III-H of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General
Plan (Metro Plan) recognizes this affiliation between Willamalane and the City of
Springfield, as well as the role of Willamalane in park and recreation planning in the
metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, in 2004, Willamalane prepared and the governing bodies of Lane
County and Springfield adopted the Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive
Plan as a Refinement Plan of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
(Metro Plan); and
WHEREAS, in 2011, Willamalane conducted a Community Needs Assessment
(CNA) to assess the changing needs and desires of the community since the adoption of
the 2004 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, The completed CNA and the findings therein were presented to the
City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners on June 13, 2011 and June 22,
2011 respectively; and
WHEREAS, In response to the CNA, Willamalane has prepared the 2012
Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan which updates the goals,
strategies and actions of the 2004 Plan to meet better meet the needs and priorities of
the greater Springfield community; and
WHEREAS, the Willamalane Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Willamalane
Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan on October 10, 2012 at a public hearing and
has now submitted the Plan to the City of Springfield for review and adoption; and
WHEREAS, the goals, strategies and actions contained in the 2012 Willamalane
Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the policies of Chapter III-
H of the Metro Plan, with Chapter 660 Division 34 of the Oregon Administrative Rules,
and with Statewide Planning Goal 8; and
Attachment 5, Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the City of Eugene received a referral of the proposed Willamalane
Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan on June 4, 2013 and returned a response of no
regional impact, opting out of the adoption process; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commissions of Springfield and Lane County conducted
a joint public hearing on the proposed 2012 Willamalane Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan on July 16, 2013, and forwarded recommendations to the
Springfield City Council and the Lane County Board of Commissioners to adopt the Plan
for application inside the city limits of Springfield and outside of the Springfield city
limits but within the Metro Plan Boundary, respectively, which includes properties
owned by Willamalane Park and Recreation District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a joint public hearing on this proposal on
October 17, 2013 with the Lane County Board of Commissioners, and is now ready to
take action based upon the above recommendations and evidence and testimony
already in the record as well as the evidence and testimony presented a the joint
elected officials public hearing; and
WHEREAS, Section 5.14-100 of the Springfield Development Code addresses the
requirements of adoption or amendment of refinement plans of the Metro Plan and
Policy 12, Chapter IV of the Metro Plan requires a demonstration that all refinement and
functional plans are consistent with the Metro Plan, but does not require an
amendment to the Metro Plan to adopt functional plans found to be consistent with the
Metro Plan; and
WHEREAS, substantial evidence exists within the record demonstrating that the
proposal meets the requirements of the Metro Plan, Springfield Development Code
Section 5.14-100, and applicable state and local law as described in the findings
attached as Exhibit A, incorporated here by this reference and adopted in support of this
Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Springfield does ordain as
follows:
Section 1: The Willamalane Park and Recreation District Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan (October 10, 2012), as more particularly described and set forth in
Exhibit “B” attached and incorporated here by this reference, is hereby adopted as a
refinement plan to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan)
for land within the land use planning jurisdiction of the City of Springfield, and within
the Metro Plan boundary, including all properties owned by the Willamalane Park and
Recreation District as shown in the adopted refinement plan.
Attachment 5, Page 2 of 3
Section 2: The findings set forth in attached Exhibit A are adopted as findings in
support of this Ordinance
Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 4: Notwithstanding the effective date of ordinances as provided by
Section 2.110 of the Springfield Municipal Code 1997, this Ordinance shall become
effective upon the date that all of the following have occurred; (a) at least 30 days have
passed since the date the ordinance was approved; and (b) the Lane County Board of
Commissioners adopts an ordinance containing substantively identical provisions to
those described in Sections 1 and 2 of this Ordinance.
Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this ____day of
_______________________, 2013 by a vote of _____ in favor and _____ against.
Approved by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this _____ day of
_______________________, 2013.
__________________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________________
City Recorder
Attachment 5, Page 3 of 3