HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudies APPLICANT 5/20/2005 I • • Report of Findings 1 ~ Site Invento ry of Natural Resources COYOTE CREEK I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Natural Resource Inventory, IAssessment, Ecological Design and Permit Facilitation ll ! -t, ell,%,itc,ip......, - ,okt -A.\ , . "ok. T.-. ‘,„..__ --_, ...„i 3T- ,^: .462 `v`_•A R 5,'• 1,a _ �- .ism f Ti !$-�;.`, k • . •.. �:�} ti '� A 1 - .. '• ' }• ` r'' ;�„ Q �T.1,�•• '-'1-N,- !"rte . % '..K, • \;y ] --�e..t .ZS• �i, Fes.. fir. ` kt -:y -A. . yam. 4,. 4 t s 1 I '4- I, -,- ' ^ .... 54:,-',WA.- T• dry; '.._ ' '" ,. , a 1j st r y__,.,.7 rt., r }� `.� `� f,� h �' . tea.' c, •P. . ' ' 1.,,1.\^ ice' �. • -.T- -- , •r1• I View South of River and Meadow Edge 1 � 05 Date Received: IPlanner 1 t,-cs 50 ,o 1 27661 Crow Road Eugene,OR 97402 Philip L. Marvin / Glenwood Property Project Tel.(541)484-7336 p ary enwoo ro p IMobile(541)521-2806 Springfield, Oregon Fax.(541)484-1233 I CoyoteCreekESnpeoplepc.corn 2005 1 • • Table of Contents 1 ' SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1. LAYOUT OF THIS DOCUMENT 2 1.2. PREPARERS 2 2. METHODOLOGY 2 1 2.1. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 2 2.2. FIELD METHODOLOGIES 3 2.3. CARTOGRAPHY 3 1 2.4. COORDINATION CONDUCTED 3 3. STUDY AREA INFORMATION 3 3.1. LANDSCAPE CONTEXT 3 1 3.2. SITE HISTORY 4 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4 1 4.1. HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION 4 4.2. VISUAL RESOURCE INVENTORY 6 4.3. COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS 6 5. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 1 6. REFERENCES APPENDIX 7.1. FIGURES APPENDIX 7.2. 1 SITE PHOTOS APPENDIX 7.3. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 1 1 1 1 1 i ' • •Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L. Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon I Summary of Findings ' This report documents the natural and aesthetic resources inventory of the parcel owned by Mr. Philip L. Marvin in Glenwood,Oregon, located on the left bank of the Willamette River and immediately downstream from the bridge connecting Glenwood with other portions of the City of ' Springfield. The purpose of this investigation is to establish the status of the parcel relative to criteria for the Willamette River Greenway overlay and setback. ' Specific criteria from the City of Springfield Land Use Code to be addressed by this report are related to(following numbers taken from the Code): (3)protection of significant fish and wildlife habitats;(4)preservation of identified scenic qualities and view points;and(6)enhancement and protection of the natural vegetative fringe to the maximum extent practicable. The site can be considered to consist of 2 different landscape/habitat features: the managed meadow and scattered trees matrix that covers the majority of the Study Area; and the riparian edge that lies along the top of bank and the bank of the River. The Study Area parcel limits appear to lie along the top of bank for the Willamette River,which is considered Essential Salmonid Habitat by 1 the Oregon Department of State Lands. The inventory was compared to the Willamette River Greenway Setback and Overlay criteria. The Managed Meadow Matrix possesses neither significant habitat function nor significant visual resource function. The narrow Riparian Edge is the more significant habitat and visual resource, although somewhat diminished in function by limited size and vegetation community composition. 1 1 1 I I 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. I ' • Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L. Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon 1. Introduction This report documents the natural and aesthetic resources inventory of the parcel owned by Mr. Philip L. Marvin in Glenwood,Oregon, located on the left bank of the Willamette River and immediately downstream from the bridge connecting Glenwood with other portions of the City of Springfield. The purpose of this investigation is to establish the status of the parcel relative to criteria for the Willamette River Greenway overlay and setback. 1 Specific criteria from the City of Springfield Land Use Code to be addressed by this report are related to(following numbers taken from the Code): (3)protection of significant fish and wildlife habitats;(4)preservation of identified scenic qualities and view points;and(6)enhancement and protection of the natural vegetative fringe to the maximum extent practicable. 1.1. Layout of this Document This document is organized in a manner intended to best facilitate understanding of the data, analysis and conclusions being presented. Discussion of the results of the inventory and analysis is presented in an integrative fashion,providing an overview and context for further understanding of 1 this dynamic local landscape. Supporting data is included in the Appendices. ' 1.2. Preparers Research and documentation tasks on this project were conducted by: Michael W. Shippey Principal/Landscape Ecologist Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. ' 27661 Crow Road Eugene,Or. 97402 (541)484-7336/(541) 521-2806 cell/(541)484-1233 fax Field assistance was provided by Andrew H. Gilmore, Field Biologist;documentation was developed by Michael W. Shippey. Please see Statement of Qualifications in Appendices. 2. Methodology 1 2.1. Reference Documents Office Research included compilation of information from the US Geological Survey Map(Eugene I East Quadrangle);US Department of the Interior National Wetland Inventory Map(Eugene East Quadrangle); the US Department of Agriculture Soil Survey for Lane County Area,Oregon, (issued September 1987); plus recent and historic aerial photos obtained from the University of ' Oregon Aerial Photo Library collection. Lists of hydric soils were consulted, including the Hydric Soils of the State of Oregon(USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1987)and the Hydric Soils in Lane County Area, Oregon(USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1990). Recent lists of Species of Concern from the Oregon Natural Heritage Program(ONHP)were reviewed. Additional lists of species of interest,as maintained by the local chapter of the Native Plant Society of Oregon(NPSO)were also consulted. Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 2 I ' • Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon 2.2. Field Methodologies The entire site was walked and notes were taken regarding the various distinct habitat areas. Areas were described and characterized by landscape position,topography,soils, plant communities present and indications of human disturbance. Photographs were taken of all representative habitat zones. IPhotographs were also taken to the site from areas with particularly high visual access to the parcel,and from the parcel to significant features in the visual landscape. 1 2.3. Cartography Information regarding habitat types has been mapped onto aerial photographs and transcribed to topographic maps as available. Information regarding visual resources at the site and significant views from the site have been mapped onto similar aerial photographs and smaller scale topographic maps. 2.4. Coordination Conducted The Oregon Natural Heritage Program and the Lane County chapter of the Native Plant Society of Oregon maintain lists of protected local plant species and species of concern. Recent copies of these lists were obtained and reviewed for this project. The City of Springfield was contacted to confirm the status of Local Wetland Inventory information for the parcel(none is available at this time;Glenwood was beyond the Springfield LWI boundaries when the study was conducted.) ' 3. Study Area Information ' 3.1. Landscape Context and General Site Description The Marvin parcel consists of approximately 6.99 acres in size, located on the left(west)bank of the Willamette River, immediately downstream of the bridge between the community of Glenwood and other parts of the City of Springfield. The Project Area is approximately triangular in shape, and is located within the Urban Growth Boundary and City of Springfield limits(please see the Vicinity Map, Figure I). Specifically the site is defined as Tax Lot 100, located on Lane County Tax Assessor's Map Township 17 South-Range 03 West-Section 34, subsection 41 (please see Figures 2 &3,Tax Lot Maps). The Study Area is bordered by the Willamette River(top of bank) 1 on the eastern edge,developing industrial/commercial on the western edge, and Franklin Boulevard and the Bridge on the southern edge. The Study Area parcel is typical of areas along the Willamette River, in that much of the parcel is a high, relatively flat terrace of gently undulating topography,with steep banks and, in many places, a low terrace that is exposed at typical River levels, but inundated at Ordinary High Water conditions. The soils throughout this area strongly reflect the geomorphic influence of the Willamette River, 1 with typically deep and very well drained soils. The 1987 Soil Survey for Lane County,Oregon (Figure 3) identifies two soil series within or adjacent to the Study Area:Series #95—Newberg fine sandy loam underlies the majority of the studied parcel, and is a deep,somewhat excessively drained fine sandy loam, formed in recent alluvium. The western edge of the Study Area parcel is Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 3 ' • Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L. Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon underlain by Series #97—Newberg— Urban Land Complex, a soil series that is a mixture of primarily Newberg fine sandy loam and Urban, developed land. Water is delivered to the meadow portions of the site primarily by precipitation,augmented with runoff from higher terraces and impervious surfaces on the western edge, infrequent extreme high water events,and by fluctuating ground water levels. The Willamette River and groundwater provide for the majority of hydrology to the river banks and low terraces along the River. 1 The National Wetland Inventory(NWI)classifies the Willamette River as a Riverine/Lower Perennial/Unconsolidated Bottom/Permanently Flooded(R2UBH)system. No other wetlands are identified by the NWI within the Study Area. 3.2. Site History The Study Area has had a long history of use, as can be seen in the set of aerial photographs included in Appendix 7.3. An orchard was present across the more level portions of the site as early as the 1936 aerial, and a narrow ribbon of riparian vegetation was present along the bank and 1 at the top of bank of the River. By 1944, most of the riparian vegetation had been removed and a more active row cropping was pursued at the southeastern portion of the parcel. The orchard was more mature by the 1952 aerial photo,the row cropping was apparently abandoned,and a few trees have reappeared along the riparian edge. The orchard and row cropping were eliminated from the site by 1968 and the site was primarily in a meadow/leveled and disturbed condition,save for a re-developing riparian ribbon. The parcel begins to take the appearance of an abandoned meadow through the 1973 and 1979 aerials, with small trees becoming visible in the meadow area,as well as patches of Armenian blackberry(Rubus armeniacus). The 1990 and 2000 aerial photographs show the parcel as more clearly abandoned,with large patches of blackberry, scattered trees and numerous trails present in the meadow area,and the riparian ribbon(even though still confined to the bank and top of bank for the River)now displaying more mature trees. Anecdotal evidence indicates that for several decades, the primary use of the parcel was for transient encampments. 4. Results and Discussion 4.1. Habitat Characterization The site can be considered to consist of 2 different landscape/habitat features: the managed meadow and scattered trees matrix that covers the majority of the Study Area; and the riparian edge that lies along the top of bank and the bank of the River. The Study Area parcel limits appear to lie along the top of bank for the Willamette River, which is considered Essential Salmonid Habitat by the Oregon Department of State Lands. 1 The majority of the site consists of the Managed Meadow and Scattered Trees Matrix. This landscape feature is approximately 12' to 15' above normal River levels and is topographically very level,gently undulating ground. Soils are, as mentioned earlier,a fine sandy loam,resulting in a very well-drained site. This area has historically supported orchard and row cropping activities, but was left to vegetate with Armenian blackberry and other colonizing species. Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 4 I • •Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L. Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon IVegetation of this landscape feature is currently predominantly non-native herbaceous species, with a scattered mix of generally young native frees. These species include: IHerbs: Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) I Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua) Velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus) English Daisy (Bellis perenne) I Clover (Trifolium spp) Lance leaf Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) Geranium (Geranium spp) IShrubs and Trees: Armenian Blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) Scot's Broom (Cytisus scoparius) I Oregon Maple (Acer macrophyllum) Western Redcedar (Thuja plicata) Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesii) I Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga douglasii) Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) Oregon Oak (Quercus garryana) IThe matrix is actively and frequently mown, in part to eliminate the numerous transient encampments that were present when unmanaged. I The Riparian Edge includes the bank and a narrow strip( 0 to 8' wide typically)along the top of I bank,and is dominated by a variety of native and non-native species. This feature becomes wider at the southern end of the Study Area parcel, near the bridge. The River bank displays large boulders and rubble, indicating intentional armorment to reduce erosion of the bank by the River. IDominant plant species in the Riparian Edge include: Herbs: I Velvetgrass Tall Fescue (Holcus lanatus) (Festuca arundinacea) Wild Carrot (Daucus carrota) IShrubs and Trees: Armenian Blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) Scot's Broom (Cytisus scoparius) ISword Fern (Polystichum munitum) English Ivy (Hedera helix) Hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) I Wild Cherry (Prunus avium) Douglas Hawthorne (Crataegus douglasii) Oregon Maple (Fraxinus latifolia) I Oregon Ash (Acer macrophyllum) Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga douglasii) Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) I Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 5 • Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ' Springfield,Oregon The Riparian Edge has received little or no management of vegetation. 1 The following table displays the results of the Habitat Characterization. TABLE l: HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION Habitat Type Acreage Managed Meadow Matrix 6.20 Acres Riparian Edge 0.79 Acres 4.2. Visual Resource Inventory The studied parcel is a relatively non-descript terrace of mown grasses,made more visually significant by the location along the Willamette River. Visual features at the parcel include the 1 identifiable habitat types described in section 4.1,with the Managed Meadow Matrix presenting a large visually open space,and the Riparian Edge presenting a narrow defining ribbon of vegetation along the River's edge. A semi-circle of mature Western Redcedar at the southern edge, along the access road beneath the bridge, is the most identifiable Landmark feature at the parcel,being very visible to travelers on the bridge as they enter into the Glenwood community from the east. The parcel is very visible from two specific and significant locations: the Day Island Park, located on the eastern bank of the River,and the Bridge connecting Glenwood with downtown Springfield. Visitors to the park are generally few on a daily basis,but can occasionally reach higher numbers during community events. Exposure to the view of the study parcel is limited by view opportunities from the park. Park visitors are presented with a view of the Riparian Edge of the parcel. High numbers of westbound travelers on the Bridge are briefly presented with a view of the entire parcel: the open managed meadow and the ribbon of riparian vegetation,punctuated with 1 the landmark Western Redcedar at the base of the bridge. Views from the Study Parcel are generally short in distance,given the extensive vegetation across L the river. Views to Day Island Park are many but generally visually filtered by the Riparian Edge. Views to the Bridge are less obstructed,particularly from the interior of the parcel. No other views of significance were noted during the site visits. 43. Comparison To Willamette River Greenway Overly and Setback Criteria The preceding inventory work has been conducted to best address the specific criteria from the City of Springfield Land Use Code related to the Greenway Overlay and Setback as follows (numbers taken from the Code): (3)protection of significant fish and wildlife habitats; (4) I preservation of identified scenic qualifies and view points;and(6)enhancement and protection of the natural vegetative fringe to the maximum extent practicable. I Response to Item 3)—Protection of Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitats. A review of the Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center information indicates that significant fish and wildlife species known to reside in the vicinity(not necessarily at the parcel) include Chinook Salmon, ' Oregon Chub,Townsend's Big-eared Bat and two species of turtle. Habitat requirements for these species include the Willamette River(classified as Essential Salmonid Habitat)and the riparian zone along the river. The Study Parcel includes a narrow ribbon of riparian vegetation, approximately 0—8' in width on most of the parcel(please note that the riparian vegetation may Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 6 • •Site inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon continue down the bank to the river,adding to the width at most locations),which may provide habitat suitable for some of the identified sensitive species. The Riparian Edge is too narrow and lacking in diverse, mature native vegetation that would allow it to be considered"significant". It is, however,the most relatively significant habitat area at the site. 1 Response to Item 4)—Preservation of Identified Scenic Qualities and Viewpoints. The Scenic Qualities at the site are the same as those offered by other parcels located in a similar landscape position: the high terrace along the Willamette River. The visual accessibility to the Willamette 1 River is the primary scenic quality offered by this parcel. The semi-circle of Western Redcedar at the southern end of the property is an identifiable landmark feature near the parcel. The Managed Meadow is neither unique nor distinctive, and the Riparian Edge is too narrow to provide much scenic value. The Riparian Edge does assist in providing visual identification and definition to the river and riparian system. No particular individual viewpoints were identified at the parcel: short views to the River and across to the Day Island Park are available along much of the parcel, 1 through gaps in the Riparian Edge. The parcel is visible from westbound traffic on the Willamette River Bridge, and at a few locations from Day Island Park. 1 Response to Item 6)—Enhancement and Protection of the Natural Vegetative Fringe to the Maximum Extent Practicalbe. The Riparian Edge on this parcelis typically 0=8' in width, widening at the southern edge near the bridge. This landscape feature is dominated by a mix of native and non-native vegetation, generally young to moderately aged plants,with little management occurring. This feature should be considered a component of the"Natural Vegetative Fringe",as it provides the most significant habitat functions and some visual resource functions at the site. The Riparian Edge could be enhanced by planting of additional species,particularly more of those species typically found in a riparian setting(Wild Cherry, Douglas Hawthorne,Oregon Maple,Oregon Ash, Douglas Fir, Black Cottonwood), in a broadened corridor along the top of bank. The Managed Meadow should not be considered a component of the"Natural Vegetative ' Fringe",as it is primarily non-native species, provides no significant habitat functions and very little visual resource functions at the site. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 7 1 Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon ' 5. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 1 Corridor—a narrow strip of land that differs from the matrix on either side. 1 Dike-A bank(usually earthen)constructed to control or confine water. Dominance - A descriptor of vegetation that is related to the standing crop of a species in an area, usually measured by height,areal cover or basal area(for trees). Dominant Species - A plant species that exerts a controlling influence on or defines the character of a community. Edge—an outer band of a patch that has an environment significantly different from the interior of the patch. Emergent Plant-A rooted herbaceous plant species that has parts extending above a water surface. 1 Fill Material-Any material placed in an area to increase surface elevation. Flooded-A condition in which the soil surface is temporarily covered with flowing water from any I source, such as streams overflowing their banks, runoff from adjacent or surrounding slopes, inflow from high tides,or any combination of sources. Growing Season - The portion of the year when soil temperatures at 19.7 inches below the soil surface are higher than biologic zero (5° C). Can be approximated by the number of frost-free days. Herb-A non-woody individual of a macrophytic species, or seedlings of woody plants that are less than 3.2 feet in height. Hvdric Soil -A soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. Hvdrophvtic Vegetation-the sum total of macrophytic plant life growing in water or on a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. Indicator Status - One of the categories that describes the estimated probability of a plant species occurring in wetlands. Inundation- A condition in which water from any source temporarily or permanently covers a land surface. Interior species — a species located only or primarily away from the perimeter of a landscape element. t Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 8 • •Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L. Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon Landscape Matrix—the most extensive and most connected landscape element type present,which plays the dominant role in landscape functioning. ' Riparian—the natural vegetative fringe along a river or creek bank. 1 Ponded - A condition in which water stands in a closed depression. Water may be removed only by percolation,evaporation,and/or transpiration. 1 Sample Plot-An area of land used for measuring or observing existing conditions. Saturated Soil Conditions - A condition in which all easily drained voids between soil particles in the root zone are temporarily or permanently filled with water to the soil surface at pressures greater than atmospheric. Soil - Unconsolidated mineral and organic material that supports, or is capable of supporting, plants, and which has recognizable properties due to the integrated effect of climate and living matter acting upon parent material,as conditioned by relief over time. Soil Series - A group of soils having horizons similar in differentiating characteristics and arrangement in the soil profile,except for texture of the surface horizon. 1 Transect-A line on the ground along which observations are made at some interval. Wetlands - Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency ' and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support,a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. I r I i I I t Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 9 • •Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon I 6. REFERENCES Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station ' Environmental Laboratory,"Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual",Technical Report Y-87-1,January 1987. Forman, Richard TT and Goddron, Michel. "Landscape Ecology",John Wiley&Sons,Inc., 1986. Guard, B.Jennifer, "Wetland Plants of Oregon and Washington",Lone Pine Publishing, 1995. IJolley, Russ,"Wildflowers of the Columbia Gorge",Oregon Historical Society Press, 1988. Hitchcock,Charles Leo,et al,"Flora of the Pacific Northwest",University of Washington Press, 11 h Printing, 1998. Kozloff, Eugene N.,"Plants and Animals of the Pacific Northwest",University of Washington Press,2°d Edition, 1980. Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Database search, 2004. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,"Hvdric Soils of the State of Oregon, 1987. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,"Hydric Soils in Lane County Area, Oregon", 1990. IU.S. Department of Agriculture,Natural Resource Conservation Service, "Soil Survey of Lane County Area,Oregon", issued September 1987(1981 data). ' U.S. Department of Agriculture,Natural Resource Conservation Service, West National Technical Center, "Western Wetland Flora,Field Office Guide to Plant Species",date unknown. I U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cowardin, L.M., et. al.,"Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States",December 1979. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Reed, Porter B.,"National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest(Region 9)", 1996 National Summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,National Wetland Inventory,"Eugene West, Oregon, 7.5 Minute Quadrangle", 1994. U.S.Geological Survey,"Eugene West,Oregon, 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle", photorevised 1986. Zika,Peter, "A Key to Common Grass Genera in the Willamette Valley", 1992. I Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. 10 I • • Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon 1 APPENDIX 7.1. 1 i Figures • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 1 III ID Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project I -- - .. . — _- - - Springfield, Oregon it..) 1' �� , HAI�CUW --_�r,?D•• =Mk HAY•£N 8_RI. LI"L't5I' -.q 4<6 'I Q �I -.•T L _ HAYDEN BR,IDDGE ,. 45 it RD II- __ _ l.ee •l _••OLAP•Ir p �e .�.•. � 6111-1):7:Sete �I. 3 ler 'r a�K_ `r _- - I i 1L4 ,Sed i I Vii- I - �'= r - I .. • 58 I� 1 -P k =27Izi.,.R•+ °•. _..- - .-.:. •I j •''- - r_i._ �I� 4879 `r.. . _ .r I▪I�'-i, .I `'\ I �I T, _, _ 1 r-7 �i���-7r�� - ZlV MIMI M1 — `- fMt-WEW• � UO�u_-.J(450 Q I I ` Moifi �� L- OL YMPIC T y t - -, 1 M' '� w ryli� �l I H �j 1:14• 1-'t }3� t3I * C---! I llHamlin +; a� -t I - - CE E�Yu,11L _ 11 Jr H - �,�;.. =,.. -�-_irrah I I_� r e tamial ,....._____[_----7-71 - �I , • ■ I-•u I'Q • — 1 -4.'1V •_. - -:�:�I�®i ., 4878•.:▪'• : ' • Li, -',-1.-.-- -- : . --,• .'i 'Al'' '' ' ti,") ',il II ' ' • -— —I-IV/ft'- ''-n, f I• .I: aJf :. � I• ' — `T r`SS MII laP m slane ., ▪ A I . r@ I I •• Iii bh: i' ' I — Ir Medw } • 1 �—■ IPerk { I J 45? ,i! _ .• r !. s �1 � _fi ' �Ifr 7 " • • I J - -----_j 6• i CSwwgal i �r- 4, �— J Sr _ _ 63 i �w Dis• __ I J �'�3 I F Ii w I Brat �{ ;4 -1 - 0 J R _ = lelartei' �`�:I ii; _ --=` sr _ �m 4.74,._ , ,s J R y fk ��c —.��.II 1 lr itiEl 11 Jr9' �� �. ■ . S6 sr 1�Iw_ I--L1 !r. • .Y. r _ ��il , l ` o ldaENE]1Z ' 'Indian- J*enty+ r 1,.. t- `*.�� s t,- omm ...i s , �- p c�rf � -'� • ` . iJ;/�� i 83 �� ' - 2'30„ `` ♦r•� �- Pal I ' Tr ,� - �_�4 ::=°-4a 9▪ `` II'. I _ 'i ' 1 w ,e' _- r saoa9., - ti .M 44$- ' I ... i. i'r� II VeteHe.aht3� - - `S-3 185 i . .. • .1. �� '5:'. ,Sprite_ eld•. Trader \\vPa _ • if • `:. r 41::Ai�.f •_. . ! park ' .., i - `.1 !. 1 �,�,Ir-r, ( y l SCALE • 1:24 000 `„ 1 i 0 1 MILE 1--1 4 '-4 1.---1. 1-1 1 II 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET G¢-;,moo adlGl 1-4 }-f t-1 �� ti I-- I I T = 1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER _ 1.- 1 r-i i-1 -1—r 1--1 r 1 -- CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET �� 5 I FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP/USGS MAP PHILIP L.MARvIi/GLENwooD PROJECT SPRINGFIELD,OREGON I N Coyote Creek Environmental Services,Inc. December 2004 I I ! s Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ISpringfield,Oregon ISection 34 T.17S, R.3N WP& 17 03 34 LANE COUNTY a INDEX 1 9.. M•► IT 0\2T= 4 i Sr Y.p 17 OS 2713 .!a Map 17 03 271 4 !N Map 17 Da 27. 3 J .I' ����, w 11414~0.1414m lo ISO pW 11,1 • X424 17—tIY.: I' . qi. 2[ =a.T y y v_ 1 .. SS ---�li -- ��'� 3 �l� — . 1 en MM IT Ob 2 Tit rat J - . It 1 . SEE MAP R•OD-b4�-.I f:.. 3 1P — — —x.14— — j /// r 1 -�� + .i :t qt x i �-� �► Ism „ �yQ-- a n•.v- V 0 IEl.aa f L . (� sEE MAP IIT-Gaao , BEi' ,,'7 s i LOT 4 os.. 1 IA1 1 357 1 1 1 b[.35 L n I •1.`" r 7 1i 4i• li.;Ji L a ( ... .,,t„.IT OS !4 2 b i W�AI// C..r� .- ° Int.[I R.Ca.I•A.II - - w �� `, I I y A L M I I SE E slap a a! l ,, n DLC M i3 aft MAP t7 OS 34 1 BEE MAP 17 03 34 4 2 SEE M �T 05 �• •. ..- C.r 17 Oa !4 !I +1. WU . , ANA -„ N I LIa • 1 ��t ,■ `EE , 1? I�tr1♦ ■ ItTM AVOW( PI I.... 1. a!! YAP 'a � 17oss44a I I SEE MAP l i u td Li 17 09 54 1 a !EE MAP IT Da 14 a • 71,, 1=� 1 � .. _ Dui: r:crr■ _ F,t 4 : 1 :5 I 61. Moo IE 03 03 2 a.. M.p 11)0304 12 III Mao IS O:.03 I I I .. eh,14, FIGURE 2: TAX MAP 17-03-34 I 1 PHILIP L. MARVIN/GLENWOOD PROJECT �, SPRINGFIELD,OREGON Coyote Creek Environmental Services,Inc December 2004 I I • 0 Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ISpringfield,Oregon IF---- 1 N.E.1/4 S.E.1/4 SEC.34, T.17S. R.3 W.W.M.sEr op 17 03 34 1, LANE COUNTY — ------ ——— 17 03 34 41 KALE r - IOW OR ASSESSMENT ; \ AND AXA I ON N NAD 83/91 N s,, LY., • , - - -..: ...,........ A033414 \s., 1 .. 'On totted.. N I I' lz•••• -....„, .... 11.033523 ' CAICULED 40.4. '''•0... , ri 5:1'' I .... .......„ ....., -.4.-t„. .-, . . . . . .. .. ::., ; „.....:„...,: ; :• . N ;o6; . . —6-....... s'i -.: .....=.......=. AppRox, WO -.! N\\ ..liiiilla•B ± 11 i, ri 1 • • L. Jr.. ..--,.... 1._ .:. ...21.\\ • • § , 4 ....... . ..„ .. :j tat 41 I Ililar\ ., ..te... \ ..-• ..e.- ICS .. . I N IL NI i \ I.. N\ 4‘ 4. -P. ... .. P N ., I 1. .. a :-. i 1_11 ..04• 5cc, A.... i \ .„ „... . ....,. .... .. .. ..... r. li 1.11 6 ., • ..... i 1 4 \t • .... . 5 ., ..:. -..4 : :. t1/2. ,.\_ ... :, \-1. „ • 1 rm. i -Altr,-- - . Al / .) , .At , 1:24,le-.6 itc.' 4. ,,. 'Tar' . Tie i 400• : \ i. • ... I I I ill, i. I \ -.. • 1 -Fair=t7;-;r.-...1.::.-iz I • '9. X . •.. ‘i if‘VI* ,. . ..,,. L _. iii: ._ it i .......,- ,. 9511' ' ..,*. • k144.-r 146°: . woo • 6-•- -- .— . .. . ... ...._ ..aw 11 ..:4,..art. ""'.'"• --.. '--.-:-:s't 40 = % 82 4 •: i it aim. . '.• -14%-....14›,•---- , I I 126; _ ; ., 4 ''`*- • Sl,. ,... . ..... .. P., ...--- ---- 4.--- ----- i ....A- \ let'en \ .,..e i01---- .' 41444•A-No;\ ..,—;.,....z..,r.,.. i Ai. I 1' . . . . ., ...., 44./E -;;''',., -,,, --.* . — . ..........- ..7,,,,,... - ...0 '',' 1/2 0 • ., jr. ,*, 17 03 374-0 4 ---------7/44?...° — „X-- . •■• SEE MAP 17 03 34 44 . I rlia wr-pq-- FIGURE 3: TAX MAP 17-03-34-41 1 0111, e...c.At.e." 41 co tw tar. ma PHILIP L.M IN ARV /GLENWOOD PROJECT I . Arr 9E4 x I.1 SPRINGFIELD,OREGON Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 I ISite Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon — _ i 1• ,1„1'9. J 1 tip' ` ,- y- 119 I `----- — `, ' I -'� ,- i 18. 1 141 i, i f P ''.' , . : — ! _ �'z.: .. f 'Pr /_ -(' t\\ J N 1.7 __---_" 15,9 c / 0 --a& :a", ci \\ 1 .... i \ _ b 39 520 1 4(xelly 95 S 2, \` 15•` \ T 1 tF t 97 r 2't i ,4'', '1,:= rs. ' i - 4' :- - - ..—: r ,A6-.'L ay. 33 -- 'Y � '; �" I 35 1§1011171lik -er - 16 if'''.IC °11:\ 5. lik` • .7.!0-6A Glenwood _ .- - :f�F , ,�'. lax 'i►•. oaf - - - �� _ sue:` ': • JAIL, _ _ I L, 125F 7000 1000 0 5000 Feet f I S 0 1 K,h)mel•- Scale 1:20000 ISeries 95: Newberg fine sandy loam Non-hydric Series 97: Newberg— Urban Lund Complex Non-hydric I /ti FIGURE 4: LANE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP, SHEET 76 PHILIP L. MARVIN/GLENWOOD PROJECT I1IF SPRINGFIELD,OREGON Coyote Creek Environmental Services,Inc. December 2004 1 • • Site Inventory Report of Findings Philip L.Marvin/Glenwood Property Project 1 Springfield,Oregon tal . ,1 N.._ , _ ..I =r. Bel 5: .....,. ....„ ...., 2..,., . 1 ,, ' . wyr j ELI • '„-'4 \ .54.,..,..„.., • iiitio , :. .. -..., IV,r .iiiiiiFIFII4Mettlirli- 1 I ', \ i lit 4-1 ' l 16111-1 ' '_-1------ .::-4:irf-li r-7-_,,,--- ., 2.Auti I-. I L \\,, i _ � �_ 111111111■ • '�I I ,: ' Jr13 . I • ill I ' 6 wr-- ► „it - ••..- t''•. IF I • �, 1r te.� ' ■ i ,.�u Jt8 -lane i.=574 — ,., -� :G' 'f i- 1. P., — imp g 1 , 8e v I Ml .r . � � K. 2f a w- I �s %,. Isla oat't:•. , ' ', ,; II •u 61'Rid* •i : - it ' _ j •.. Ed/19 ' ;, , - udkl -1 t. ellck4 1 14 ;' • ' 1 Ir 1 i\-A:.):-_..i-a \' .....,,,, 4, --1,........ --'-----,...._ ", / w; i ,r AC, 'I�, ! !A A . rFOf 1 ml. , �� L -- 11,10 ':Sri �. A,,;� 1 �/f �Jllj' lit ' Ti 1 1 / ` -.I� pa' 1 T '11h 1/�// y c �� , �' ' �/+`� ! - k , . \ /�� � ��I •III � _�Pa k' Ps I �Fy/!lc:A� � �,—�•7. \ /�� .1� \\\\t 1 ill a1.'.�rAl. `1 \�`7 yY�r � 1 W ---1----I "b ifilli`ilticei,----1 - • . .1,1 -A1V '7- !•`--. \ •I''.■■■ ---;1F___ _.,,,,) yir.-,_, f `cif lti I \�r r 1 r` 74-'- E'� `` — �.,� �Tla 111 t �',1 a� ,L�` roe y `"'� I —'i A �:r1 �/ •�-MI 1`11 , I 'A,,.^.; (1,\N,, ! SCALE 1:24 00� � 1 0 1 MILE ti\ yY t O•„ taro—=— —. ` ` / )1) 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET �I F' �+ �� H rti. '-w tom-, , -a • - I ',"tip I, 0 KILOMETER ra .� // CONTOUR 20 FEET 0167%,), `1i� •111 . � � :61 „..-t.„. ......„ -„......._ ' FIGURE 5: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP(EUGENE EAST QUADRANGLE) kg', PHILIP L.MARVIN/GLENWOOD PROJECT SPRINGFIELD,OREGON Coyote Creek Environmental Services,Inc. December 2004 I . . . . . : •.. . 4 .. P t § III. z 2 ,.. millg* 0 , 0 0.1 ..1:1 8 0 cc t .... < w , tJ .... L.) 1 ..I/ r•-• .0 a... CI '1) Z 0 in 4C ti 4 ,.. U ..,.-/ A• [-• . k- co - - ...._ Et,15 lk - Ei ••• , • ..(2 k 111.1111141k • • I ... II '•' , JP' •• . IA .... ••• . • 11111"014 ..; •- • IAII;--- ' . . . . ' . .. i i A( 1 .1 ....- , — ...... er . ..... —... ,. . . 1 If th .1. — —4••••-• . - _.., 11.• . • V''4' • • v ..,`''... in, 44 , . ih a - V..HI.* . . 4 It .... i---- ... - . .... 1011, ■,; -11, . .,..,,,,.....:-.tit tiv-•:-• PP' s • . • - .......%,- 473)."--! 1 •_ _........ IP . v — ........„ , ,.. ........ 1 . . „„„..... ....... , ... ,.. 44 I. 4,-. .__ dip 64-4- . ... - . a• .. alli • .146 s -411. 1 li 4 4 Olov L iit:Itim. 11111 ,.. 13 ... .. •11,tri • A., Ir. .. . Ji • 1 164.19 •-•., C:4 .• S.. a •.... Ilb •I .4, 111%.''''' i . . , ■•• 'it5 .., 111: -vow. viii.,4 v_ i 1 III bit , ey c..) C ll. qs 4, 4 ii ,. • ....,.. . . ti 1.q . / L.* . ? - • • O. ' • i § .1) • 1111111, 'II . -'.. 17 . k ti , le . ,11 • I ' t 111' _ .._ , "Mt V' 0 ..... ...• • 0 ...... .... :1011. • l — 404 / f 11. I-. :tt AI . ... . , ---,--, , _,.. -, • -,... I t,....., • . , . . , Jr. . A. "•. , ... ...0 ... " t 11, '-' - 7'.. tr ha 1 .3,1 . . ..... ii, .. • .. Ai., Om, 1 i IP' ." a. '' ' ii.....- . abash A160.4_, 4 irt — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ,. . ....- .._. _ icy • ' . . . .::.,•.,,,i. ._ ,- r...... .0.1.r., orL.,:i..-.•.-- . -' •%.:r.:. "..,..;.:_i-, • .. . . • - . 11004011 ,,,, ....., . .• .. . (48 ',S,i• • , :) -0. .6 C> ! ' '•'.,": . k, „ II ...r , ...- . • oh mi 0 .., • E Ci ■ . A . 1 r . F 0 Ce ...-' ... • 1 4......41, 40 CL . 4 > '---- CA 4101f ,,... *.... . . ., ., ■ Ade t:-: .......> .. . _ ...e. . ..‹- -- *-• . . - D *Y.,..1Y6 - -.1.+0 C..7 • • ... . - i .. I. ,,e . ..• - ■-) ‘' ., . . ..• ill, ••• , r-• , ,...eci,..... - in” ...... ii....., .- - .-41.- 'r 0 . -NO % 4_ /ri - .. . .• A• -,.. . • 4,_.... , _.... ... . . , . . . . _ _ _ i -. , ; r 'it. 4hi.- .- t_''' . .• .... • -'. 43„, .0.' -`.. 4 . . . .. t.''' • ' ":". - • '-'•_7-- : ,... ._,.., tii.-...# i •7. r4:-. ...., it . , .44" .LIgeti, :•". SI . le . -..-.1111-. .. ' .- . 4. IIII ,. a- 0 . . . gad . • ' .,••-•*;,' , I' . ''! .d.41„.04.. _ . • ,• le ' N• •• *. • --,-..,. Pa ,•',)1-; , . , .,. . -•- . -.,-"'r...• ,_.-'-','A. ' - .0 •.'taw . , 1- • - . _ .. • . 1 - 6 ir• 1. • -'7'.: • ., • .. c .. 4,. • , • ; 0,.. . - ......, ,-74;-,.• 4,14# . .;,- -.- .-!- ":---: ' -',.#1-: '--'1 .-• Ab •11V5.•'' '.. ". - • r . • ••' . 4. .v- # - _ 0 c. , • •i.-. :- ' . .• - • _ it ......:-...1`. ;:• • ' 1,•.• • if . . „, . .. .,,_'--- , iv .. -, 4r • • - ...i.,,,,0. . ' 4Y i . ' .e. ' -'l' • :■i• •' .-: . Yi• i07:::: . _ • . _.. .4g. It ,. .0 - • -.,;1-..-,.• , _ ,-.. . --* - - — le . • .,. • • •,, t , - . . • ..i. . : . ...„, -::-..eric,•_ -.,' . . ,:4•4-- ...... ‘..".-.. •.-, . -'..•'! -• 'r d..414`, A . r.,. _ , . r ''•4iitiww.,..'-. ... 0 ,'...-. .....0.•;iali 1 /0 -....- ' .i... .. - . . .v r,!.. „,4 . .„,711.--; .- .- .• as•---.f--- ,' . ..- . - . t . ...d e.. . . ... . .- - t. , . • • ... .. . . _ . • ... -.1 i • ilk -'• V . ( 4. 0 ' .• !' ''' •TIO -.......- . _ .. . . 4.-.....• ifr ... . . • .. oh. ,-: .,.,. . - i=„,• ... •" • . -t •-• ... _..•'' ....'*, .--,..' • ' •-7-4.1eft "..4'3,:'!.' •■•• 1 . ...i... . - - .pt_ •'. ,, — .• ,: ( - ' ftk. .11 '7 ' •, ' a r r .0 . •''.. •- -,• ' Ail *ill'. 'Alp - - • . a •. 1. 111111 . . ' . . ... ..,,,,1 .• 4: ...,.k.-:• :iii.t-....,..-.7 i' p„ — I 3... _....d. .. 18.".11111101.am a - .--...• 4 ... - t%) • .:.;-" f dilk- ' ' ....s.fger....1. • ...1 1 .0, ...' :•IS''''' . I , 04 . lir...7r . ... it■ii. ' _ ... ..... 4 te t.> .. - „.• • 11)1141:1144- .. .H 4 ... ......h. , r.2. N 4. '.--.. . ...4_,..4... ._ .. 4W "11, t 1 ... • • .±404...,.'111...., • ftnwr, - • . .... • 6., , . • fa r...) ,,.. a • • .......ii .. .. 'e Ilig s cat - . - •• I. pc ... . 11104.•,a _. ...-- C' ' . Nrtis a., . . • , •lorzet.,..,..... • 411P . , & ..-..... ..,„,w . . .41. . .. III - :• . I:t 40 1 -,..Y,.%-",-.V.p v. gkl-t ' 1144, .6 lik-2 / .,. 4_........... 1 . % ‘ _ . • -r,...-.7.. .14:-.-.-.. • , ,-, ., ,,,, --......„. . . op, _.. ...... .... .. . • ., ..... pc„,• :. o • 1.1 p) . .... , I. ••■... OF 1/P 4 ' 1111 , Fil 1 • of‘ •, v,? ..., il 1 .. •' -4-- .` 17 • , - . -!',43,.. ..,-,-,• 1 1 1\11 . ,......• . , . . . .. , ......... ,... . ... , 4,•,,,:., ... a t t .... • .! .... ...„.. ,.., 7 . •,,, .. . . .. . . .... .... ,,.., • NI ... oit I ... ..-O Allapp. * NI. .... 1 • I'vp. 4 , .' ,,.s — v......, • . Mil IIIII MEM IIIIII MEI IMII Mil OM 1111111 I= II=1 11111 EMI EMI MI EMI IIIIII 111.1 MI ' • • Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ' Springfield, Oregon 1 APPENDIX 7.2. 1 1 Site Photos 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 1 I • 0 Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ISpringfield,Oregon i A i I. 1 - y. I . r i r -� y / -. IView Northwest of Managed Meadow and Scattered Trees Matrix fi r '7 ` T r .=. _ 1 1 IView Southwest of Managed Meadow and Scattered Trees Matrix ICoyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 ISite Inventory Report of Findings III III Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ISpringfield,Oregon R' I ti 3y qt ,.• ;' ‘---- `#.•,L.�T-'a! .r 2 a: �A ► 4 `. D"- ,t i� ti 3 ty I t� � IC q► +4. !!� I .4 41 ..., -, 11 et _ ....... I , 14.,-—.,...,zik 1 , ,4.. ; -,,,,,i\*,?,-,1:1: _..'::-.;;'--1141r ..- —,-'-'.144- 4:-'14, -,4---.:--Ir.1*•-‘,__:.:-.1: � : _ ' 4n t f t — -�`. a. 0.r�, s.7.ti h. � ti L3 ,- Jf -� ' 1 ,� ,v I , s -. OW ,,,,r,..4 i "r �s~C -: + -"4., .r y • �, r m a . 14.- View South along Riparian Edge at Mid-Point of Study Area Parcel(note River on Left) -NLA., - v . ':-A-_--- - 1_---^ri ,R - , '~ Wes-• - 4 �_r f .-�+ L N...,[ , s a _, � _ � , g S ti .... '•I yt40,- fT om . \ .-. 1 'Y :' ,a:.r i tiu J I t.s • .Y- A k '..a`l:1 1 jC IView Northwest along Riparian Edge at Mid-Point of Study Area Parcel(note River on Right) ICoyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 0 410 I Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project ISpringfield,Oregon n , A 1 als!, 7 t �� ` ,Y'-,, •5. C ,kk +.� f ' 1 i Y " x r . ;,..,$-.!., k # rf A L2 1, t ,r • , _... .-- ; ._ ' :',, A . ,ntsvitriN, 7 . AV I E r y t , 447;-°;,A' r ' J 6r + i ,. S 1,414:i'.. r--_- r' -r 4 '[r fr .-r`7 . . ,. -r:;t • 41 a \r :+. rte. ■ /�//i.. r- , 1y 1►. IView of River Bank .:....-.,7c...• f- - .. •• ' `- t y f J a s__ i o + !, or ' r, 'er_ _ r 7r , y � i, s #.t.✓ •{ Ia Jb tSX ' t�� 1 . h '• h I °ice ) l E r 1 � • ilt, ;i _ a Y y' �/, View of River Bank and Low Bench Terrace (note large boulder for bank armorment) tCoyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc- December 2004 ' • • Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon 1 APPENDIX 7.3. 1 1 Aerial Photographs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 1 .t at hi • r + L v ect • ifs - . Pt; 11. . .„, . II a . • -a. , • .., At. if /1191r7741 '',- C lit .,, . 1 lk 1;1 a 11 t:•- 711"-..-, iff' . l' i • . „. 4 c,A140. 10 , . . . . ... Lir--. _ -_-: .06 . . , • ... .... II, . i .1,-., .... 4. _ . 47.,_ • 01•41.4 4... . __ 4. „ l , *4 . . :11,01;....1114 a iit i i 111.' •\00:00106.„.... , -.' .. 4 i ti aria,4 + , t r ,, :_ . • _ „r„ , : , ..., -....; A •i• •' - • • - It 3 0 .-- - ‘ ' . ' - s , A e lopt • "9 t . It-4.- .l• r•�- •r - MI # _ r ply - .. i � • i7• ' •i 44 lite ' . -.40,„...io- A. • A• r� • ' • :tif, - ,7,3,-.:_. . • , , .' '. 0...../A- , 144•01,),.. •• ' l......._ lap . II . ,,ei. .'".-.-N.' • . • '. , ,t1114* ell i., ......V3 I .1fr 'V -ar its40,-..664_:'I ., 1, 4,11.11:11:1111. • r.....•r, 1 . • A I it i/ .401i...y 40i ir Air%L- 01 1 • 44,•••■••• a._i .."... ir iii, dr al raj -ill ■ qi .r •••pi .... ,,:t...L. - . --4C''' ..i! � . . . ...S: i it...... 4: t , . • *�_ .. .ice i irhh 41 lt • la ,:....iogim....tr-- -,_ _.--- __ --_=-- -. 7.,..4. IS ' . ■ 46, '. . t 4, • r a. ; 1..-• • Imo. . . i . l le A ali -1119. ` t i +L � _ �� 11 9 ill 1. -tom t• • 11 EP A s - tr-,0,-• Ali ` ` ll L • . S yr - f . ■' AAA .s. . • ♦ • • MN OM in MN NM — — um um im NMI NNE NE um " ri r,i , sha , ... „... ..•..._ _ '•'• t:10 . '• . - . . lat. •r.. ... , * „ ... :. , , .. _ HIN . i 4 ___ i .- , ‘-lip% : . ' ...„. _. --‘41 \;.'., 't- . *, 1, , , .. ,. , . _. . i , . ..„ ',... .. ,• ...• • • r- -- - 1 •i 'i1' . 1- .. zz .-' , oI i it- -,r I‘ - . •.sj. .' -T . K , - l yr , _AL, I , . 7,i....7,1 ., ... Illn.1 . ., r *IP - .k 1, - Ss „..i. . OP. lt,/, ---. -- 1. , , T EIIH:' _, . lit . t IP , , ,, -1 ...„6„....ar .4._ 1, ..iiiit "jig 1 f e - f • do_ T-. V6. ." .....711111111114111411116.. L. r rt - ..,:.:27 x •• ji • :4 . o sr sir lic-r. ,,,, _ . . . . . - i A 11 .......0 .' di, "1r • • , •,,• . . .. .„__ ,.... • ../. - - .,11,:* e•4147 ' life c, • • • • - - •t C- I IP iaiik . . -,1 • 41 .. ,• :II. . ••, ...44 .,.4.. k 1 . . e. .... Jr-ag" ..- „aPi' • .._ 41110P1 ,it a• • • . , .•,100 -71\ AP. e JP ir a 104.4., 1. 4 k 1 r • • „. •. - - , , _ . - • ,, . - ill• 5, 4 • t " . ' IV' 4Pf Illi , .., # k r • . •' 1 V il 141111-The • - ' 7: , en. ,5,, " . 0. 4 ! 4 . it X', #.-- VII r . 1.1.41. . A V • ir 1. - •.- II t *.., ...r .,.„ 1/4 • 4 .4 . V. 1Et. ,,, 4, , . . 1-. 4.' I. •* Nksiti. ••4' ■ -. I 1 . '40 • lir NirN . .... .. .... ,1. . „ . . ■ 11. - a • . . . . ,.. .1a J. 41 .., i ._..2 . A _,..4141 f Iiir - 41, ,. 4••• i.,i i % • ' . ti, - F • ' . . al , g -.• 4 . • 4 , . . . , it ill' • . .1 .r. .., it I, .,- i • lb .-, 1/4111:2 . V - _. . . . - ,of 4 • L-.‘ - I . ... • 1.• I ' • • - _ .. , • , .0. 1111, i •• oip , . •1;i• 4. .• S'it 1 -r . lib . - Ir. • il •••• gwlei "..... ,..., • . * 4 . , -'11 ifq s ( 11114. ab.• vi.--,•- it, , ,-4. I, • , ---.7.-------.____--- •1 -, ,, _- .:- • t ; _ ... 4 WEIS _ :. ' -', - ‘ / ' ■ 4:1 . •4), APA-_,-...i..L.„,......_ _ .7....„ . ft, • - i .: " wit • IIP _ ...4- . 7- .... .. .... .. • . * .- • . :: . r =, ...„,....s. . It `.- il ■.■ 4.1 ' .: .•_:= -----2--- --_---_-__%.-7.-.r. i- 111111110 • Joe.- ., ,(A4, , -, .. ____ - di .04 • _,.. , 16111". ' Or r .. •11.-1- / 411. ,. fil 14 va lit..--A., , . .. I, ., - .4."I 11 • ,I f . d' Ild.. rl . I " 6 •:f5.411. :*• ''... - • . •• • IP,"1' ii. .A JP..•-. as k" J - ‘ OW a A L 4.. , ,. :.... __ . .i - lei e-sti ., c .-...._ . - '.14 II, '46,.. : I ,. ..:,-..t. , . 4,, : • ._,. .„ . . -.. _ i...__ i . . r lortd • ...trt.. •_ , -- . . , ,... ill . --. ..4*--7 r . " •..4141114.0"), • ..‘ -a• ... . 1" 0 • _ 11) __It: 4. p . 0 . . I. ,, ... oda A'• .44. . 41/A.1. •4,Iiii . • alp e■ • * 4 .4 ..6..6 1 11. I- 4-1 ' i ilfrOir LAti ..1a. I _ •, s. i . I, .: • a • •r. (4- * 0 .1±•_ • 1 •' 141/1 sit' :16114.1r. Iti'011t‘i- - S111461•L4 l' ' . ' • ....4 . . „,„,,,,,.16 t._ V. i nilailw .., ...... T••••11 •• .:„. w elaw ".- ° " w ' 1 lir It".• 16 Ar - I ir,,,,,,"4, r A-411. • IM .0,2 AAP 4 IV so- t lieleri rov,...i --..._ „ r 11P411,4p.., • . .. . - „..••41 . . .--,11.4. lik• • . . !ININIP: 4., • .. , • ' .0 lt6P '4ml - * • , f4. fill I I 11 t, - 4. • ailirr Vb. Veil, _ • . • Aft, L . 7 ik. - • • , rw4i 4 ee, 'low I 111 ok .. .. . ..1.* * ip iii• ' 4--.4rzr • At-• 4 • . .4, - it . .. . _ . s ,.tr. ' - • •- a i_ 01 U -_ 1 Vit ...- .4' • iir _ _ -.: f VI rt. • •at ..:---.-44--••• ••-•-- ._ ....____ 10 -.....,___ ..i. - .;.-1.11,14 . . '- ■: : ' , Sae. ..... EF:,.. ....... p............ IF . • • -. II a ,714 " • -611 .,,, ...." •,... . 11, 1 - • W. li•6 .z_, .----•-- -- - ...,-- .1%11..4. 4 •-' .7. - ' .r.r. 4. 6 9% . 4.• . . 3 .•, - IA• A iis ''1 ----,:i. r4i," ii- rit -1 i li l' 1 - I 4` 11 4• ' I 1._. .ill OP. II;; ••.'_•".'-.-.... , .....:•-•"7-` 7, ''''■.....:- __-,......-..■- _ 1 .-11M • - '" • • ' 14- .!`• 4)ifi, %AV, , •••-_ •••••--- -...-_-__...:7-.....-_- 4. . i ..s.OK, "IP •da I IN • 7...-""-..-"117"••••=-7.--„, _ . we! .4640..,.. - " * VP IV. 1 . .t. -. .... h. ■•• IC r .... _ 0 .. f. • I • ,1, . , -. 1 ii. re'• i .) ___..................-....-•■••- ■•.. .•............. ....-•-.•••.•••-- 16,..,lb . "III i w44-.., . _Ix . __ 4- • it+ qi ill "Alb 11 1 - /AV 4 la: r alltri- *0 " ... 11474,4 • . , - 4411t!" loy•• '• -"Ft. :.et A Pri..1• -f -i" ' % Ill illr . •• ta 0 * . •_, ••,,, „.. i. * ilP*.il illb 4, -I/, * sig s• ilk ill 1• . -.• - 0 a . •-0-e.. .- *. -• lit •100 ila IL •• lel. 11 i Cyr( illitilli it a fr• ii - • • ., - .like „r , • 0 *Milt - • ' ' it *. % ell , a V aa /WA ',PP.4. 7ai:"- l'IMIlilid , /' . is-- --d4.- '• , i ' ,- di gr -f‘r , - ..-..,. -,,,, - * '• _. ii. , . . . ...iit pli „..... .....- . . r ... evi . .4........11,7..... i: •' * - 4* , 1 • ....- 4 'IL , aaf 1 Wk.- . 1P.1 le , ek'rert; ....■.... O. .1. NM 1.11 Mi MI 1111111 MI MIN MN MI 1111111 Mill MI MI ., •••,, - : "54 4;.1$■ 4 • i _J•441411111( , Mir t A 4 • •r _ lir . -_ Ilit ." • — , rat....-•■• . ---.....- r-1 ,- g-c 'el I rkirt ' Z , " i -' :■ sow. Or••* Fig, ; . --a 7 C ' ti et -' •• ... .. a . ; ‘4 '''• _ f• f dr ,4e 4 14 M714 ■ -,- I/-• 4 • 1 OE r II 1 . k 6 . 11110 , . •■ Plir".4 N b i 6,ii..--... id .7-- • •• . . . ,.f c.•t \b. • ..--• I I . ... 0 • 1 Sr c i it • - il • VW J. _ , • — lit 4 _ • -4.4. V ' -.-- - _ !I • •44..;. . I •--- - • * • 4, 4, 1 • a . _ 4., '' ` a "Sr'' 111 ' , 4 • . , ...... . . ,'. • • a f • .10 1 • IL 1 • '+Of - I. ... .0° . •11r: . --= -- •\41;: •-• . 0 ''1.* ../ NW 04 ''.., " tak s• .. •-• 0 A . \ 1 ftr- 01510illw— , . . .0 ' • 44di ' • T1 ... . If• di •4 4 ..iba *4, i• it ..4.0.11h, a „..... ,....,,,..0 - ,:ltipoellir • _ 4....• fi •4 ityi f-- , 11... '1 • • IP •• '7. 4 . . * lt, ...- 111 _ • .• . -IL • ..,. - ' 2. ii, # ,- .. (1 ••• . 1 4 ik, 4, , . . / ,a 4 4 • lir 34 • ..., " gO ' 'dr. ' '• . . . • .. Nk 11" a _ •:• , . . . .... . _ '.4 i • 3 s . ...• , ._ / 4 1 A 41011 J. • • .:-. .• ,.., P ... . ,„t•;; .,* a . ... -I• -' • - ati);:e'41 ' -.716---• -, . .7-le-1 .41'. .1 1"e!li.4:,- '... ..■e- 4... . . - -i( A - . .,--1 .41,1111111111(. p tl. •:: / . '' 4.4, • ,)000.4 :1 : . Ai _ • . .. . . • - . ,..._-4:111 • - -.... .w- , v,-- 4_11r ', NN,'1100„,....- • • r..:(, :- i- . . .-'" P4.4- 7, .... r ir. lir .it ...-- \ie. ••.,-- ......_41 , /- • , -7--.' '''.P. r4-''' .....% • J r . , - .. .. ,.-5 .:it:-•' -". -' ,*._'''", ill\ - • i- 4 - - ---,- -'i.. - • 1 ' i - .„.'LLA -4_. idi 'IN'- *- •-a , ,• . , ...r• 1 r.li . . - . •i . ., i ,... ' ' 1 4* f •■ I. -.4 ',4.;I?'".■ '-pii. --,-r-'I •.ilt .,61 ..46 1-a- -.44 -,,i. '.. dr 7•i,..' , III -111 '0 • •/`'2%Ni • - r 11114 t .. • , NI/ lie, 11 .A . -111111 i g fv ft % ,...A. "°4-r- A..4. 7.. •i 1 . 4- 'ti .. ..-14- 1 ...r.. .i.,.. . ti. 0;.. . . Titiliot- sielri PI:r8,:. 1-4116.16.):rt::17 ,. _ _., • ; ,s . ., * *lb • ir ' . - • . 1 pt. . . . T . • II ilk 1 • V * t i. ... i ''''0, _. , ,.• . ....: . • i - -• , ir f • .., • ' • '' . .g- .. t . * . 1,0' • .I. 4 1• - : •C••• •IIF * i•.1 a„,,, . r III • , , * -,rw ... 'ill • •''•.'' .. - L ...r, , -... , II 8 4 ,. ,t;1, 1 t. . i .0-. • ili . - 4 1. - i• - •ry , .. 0 . ohm* ,. .AI 4, • t-lli - i • .... ri f we, • ,,, ... • )14 • '' . 4'.a _ 4,4 -•91 - I i• 1 4 _ lilt i r _•k,1 -4..., i or lir I . • • 1.‘,14■ -.14Prie . t • ..,;* IL. 4.. .... : .i-7 0 . . 3,43-• • e i % -. • , li- ..; l - - - .;,. e----- .... - - - ._ Whew • ., Ir... -,- . •••,.." .44 1 • 7 Or —.--... t 1 . • k--, •'P. c. . , It:-:9 * ' . " os4216-," - '• . • J ... , c -I 4 14 1: - . . iit .. l■ - ......=-_ .. ''a•• 4 ' - Z ' '- -I r 'fb 11. ".114'. 4 ' Ale".■ . . - - 6 • 4 .'` '. ' . .:- •` 11P / .. -41 -.)/ -- ,- --.- - '' . '• f• t .- V. ......._ 4 ' he -ser - _ ' - 41,' , •11 - - e OP • Tr A %. • • ''. nii 1 gwismaki ■ mu .., me imi EN em im um son mil I= imi am me ow um imi sib s IF" w • , • - , •�, � r • _ . L _ I Wi • ; :: a • Y • ,„ i6.- ,. ..._„.1 _. _._ ..tee *` • 4 ' _ ,Tet,-• 1 . '� +i _ n+. S . . . = - ' art- • T p •. • ' limo . 7� _ 1 r r ^ • 1 Wk.,It a no. -- ... . ,, . 7 P ' ‘ - 1 I. •• "-.X;. ' 1"'' , k . , .. eta- par • -A- , . ., ,...„ f . A vs.s.' NL ,,,,. ... -.,111 • 1 • s i . A Lr_ j ` + 4 g000, S4,• P• r • l� - .r•R - t-i f • _ .1*, ' V. . 0 t .t.f , ,•illik.....,_ team. • 1 :_ „,,,,,, „. .........„ . Lid 1:,- ,..•. • I. 1W4 le • t� 411 ` ,_ 4ts , .„,,, _... it I ;' 'T•�! _ ,i SAS "„r ''� \• t:: I. r , , �. i - ..... ...sjlitt 1 , •• ,-...11 . .... jp • . '‘‘, 1 ,„ .• •••• Ida.. -• ,..1 • Illitklill'ili; v- . a._ i•••••_ N.:... ' -- : ,; 4_.‘ .. .fge. . 4.44;, atiti.**-.. -70,:r -.7ii-A.. t . rw: , ..... . _.„....._____ . 41/4. •. Si.I: 111 4 I .141 . .... .6%. -;'--, • 4..lilti: _ • • , ■ V 41.411.441i . " ' 01. ..,' t . 1 • 4. •• Am. -17.rt. 'fit •- . . . .._.. ..- ic, ._. . .. ...,- . . ..t.......". i a i ',...1% ' •-!-.: ' .... 1 etl! 7/11. f h •11. . . , Jr g' '.111e ....-v I II a ' • • 4 '' -itit P/Y.lot II I II ,i. 1 .-�_ T i w - � l - • •T�� - •j r .y � � Ià� �� 1 P.• . .• J^:t ?� .1' i S..4.E . i 1 - '11 448a. .4'. .. 4, I O - - MN MI IMP O MI - - - MI - - - - - e -, --.=•.f- • • d• 7.A* -T 7 0 .-re: •••• - •••• Ili . Ilgr! 4' -7.%-5-"rweli-v"'-- , .• • P •1.ht-i ti-.1 . ; . _ ea. .. 46, . ' 0 VI. ' • . 1101 _ IC • I "ti•-•a2..7 if •• . .1 .. ...s. . . ii el - • .' ,. 1. • . '''. till #1 1014111 tril ' -.In 4 ' e',...... • •:' . illikr;.•'V . . .. • ... . - r • 1 , - ) - • • - 4 1 [it 1 .A - v. ..; , .-- '' . -4,-, .1 11113 1r rt Am Mi; le;. , • ," a 41„, . .....,. . . _. ,../t Ilt-41 ' , -,,,. a 0 "a 41, p - • • .•• - . • „, -• • 4-, - 4 t • .- . . .1,.. L •V. • . -Tr 7- • . '"/Illr°11-*" ..i t -1111 0 ' • .- P p ,' . . . ... L 4" ilb, , 1 .1.- I al 0 ...:. • .- t., .••• 1 4 IP ..r. . . I •" . a . • -._ ilk- -I _ f 4- 1 - ill • - - -rs. Vilm=... 1 Jr: •- NI I . ' ,- , rr- ... _- •_ _• _ • . , -- 4 i . •e. •' 0- ...4 ° 4.-t ' • ' - ' % SP 4. ..''. . , -• • - • . : • ilt: 11.- iliv...■ ag • Pli . it IP. 41 '- or di ,.. • • .. • • - 0 ',vet.- •,,•. , a lb 10,, . g•- i _le tillr.a4 "lik .r. 11 41. ' i_ lor 4 --- • 4.1#"' • • A . . • P. : °- .' , ir _ , ii• * •, - , . allikll 'Ill , • '• 4. 41 . ii . Of II . - . ..".. , .- a. A, '-'s ,-.• ••, ., ,- , - . _ 1 . _ 0,11e r, Itilk. .•1' 4 • • I 16 Iiis)rigir--- 11 1 14, . Ili ,, wg ft .., , II . it - 0"---- pliiir- - . .. -•-•• .1 _ % pier .,„ ,T ''.411c.°! , -1 _...•4 r .4..". . .9• ' • II" or. , ......: 1:00 ..ii16. ala A• . . li • • - i -, -' te- . • •,.- 1111 : . n .,.:.„ _,*:1 t ! .. . , ,. 4; . • 111 -..' f •-_ ,'_! - _ ., . 111111P .• ?... - . .• , . .. .. - - ,,„' • it ,..- . . - fw "'" 1 4 •" ,. .., ...._;-. 4.- '--.-alt . drillMeliCi if van& a■ _ . - . - ..-, - - • ,----. . • 111P a . . .ta-.4- • III. 1 A • . 1.--------'- '..---/ • ' O.: , 6 , • •.. 1r j ri IP A., -7...• J.lir- /• -- a - . 1 -* .....trlr- , .r, ' 4........- ,. • eZ - - • '''' .--• -I a • ,. ', • - ', 1.11104., . ,_ , Irl• . 6 4 • t.4 1 II• -...- r.Ct_ a I . -:. •••4 ...a • r 2:1171 , _.... ,iti-r .... . , . • • le......-eelbc t ..,. .... ,...4- . .• . .,. . • kL, IC pimp ....■--..-- i lir.. t la i7. r '14'. ' a• it -- ........., . • •„''W ?. - r; e - • &if-- , oit i -i-_. ....it . Ps -' lit- • ill it - - • - . 1., '. c,_ILI'.. '. , ! , _;... a , . a P•; _....• • s'-% . iris . 4 it 010 ' ...1..--.. .- - • 7. .•..JP-a ' -.1 '''• IP ll T1 ...: . _. - ,A*._. ... _:-. 4L.----- --iik .... w . 4.... .. : . .....,.. .,.. .. , ... • .. •,.• "..„,,.. .,... ._, . ,,_ • • ., , •. . • ,..• • si3' -::- .... , ... . _ . . ... ... , ,., an. 111,11111 so , ;11,•,-••... 1111.11116. . . -AI ... - - . ill -- - I . . _ _ 11 tt e* ■ .. . ...„. alf- 1.4 .,. 11 , - - ar$000-..--, 4t, .1.51 .. • 01116 P 61"1" . - . , J 0 ' t/ , • 7 -k4P- -, •4,.. IP 114 4. 7-14. - - I.. • _ .... ..K. I. i T AV - -',•, Ilir . - . s• . t • C ''' ' lir'.' - . ' .. , . a r 1".17,,,,,. * ,• I ..- . • P- •''' '; - I •••••vc:: • • irli- • _ m. ., .ir r".•• • • ii . .0 a 14/4 S. •- ir / _ . . _• or- - ,. I. 0 110001 li.. tit •iii, . .:- - . ..5 1 p •-. • ao qii40ii.11.tr- i 0 +. • ,•. 11• -....- ,- et . _......... . • Imp Iml EIN ... =I EIN I= ■ sol NIN NIN INI 1m =I low =I ... I= EIN Kh r p , y __..7- . if --w_ 1 � , _ r .. .0" ak , I -.• • ,.. .6 L-i T Lr . • iii;t" • I - . it 11111411°3111111111111111111111 tk?. :11 1 ... •1 . 1 N. ....• 1 F- :f 411. -- - — tie* r • `-....IP p ..., II ,... 114.0 .. ' ..-- ... 0.. .... ...... JP 40 .. .. A. ..• — ' 41.' .r , _ ,. o- • ` 74 A I 1 .A ......... 4.. -- r is 1 - r a•.a .-.. w■ $... • - '.... . .... , ,. ... . • liP- .• mil. it ..... jii„,ciiiicierell- .,. t' .`. .',Irfili,aile11;14. . \ ''..- .. _ 'V - - 4 -- '.I , .„e % 4..._..... ..\\.....,,. tip gb i 10. ... - .... I. -* .."I 4 r 'I Cr, r t=''it 46 V- t A " *iiiii , ' 111h14 • * .t• ' i I . _ _ I 0._ , ,,- . --)* • 4- :.---- I - I • re - . ...• a A - - - J 91 — ;r • - " .. ; : ' 1 - } . r- J I • r cam_- l 0 0_ 1443441. r, � s _ . �;°- " ih ft W.r • 7.0i11-- II":" • . .-A: %i • 1%4 .0. .._ . - ,-4 e- ._ , • , . _ _,.. „. 1.1, , , I I I :: ta.h .....• , - -; - • •,1• ..(jr . . - -__ _ at,- i _ _ . - :Tie— ._. ' Aa" [ 1 A 16 ' — . :: - ..-. ' .,(all a. '--r : ii,, • , i I,i). - ( tr 0, . - -4r• -.m-7"4;7': - r..Pi .. J ` L a ; ► • . -Jai* . ... - — 1— — — — — — — — — — ... ... in. ... — — — — ir■ r- ams% . _ 1 r. ,1 1174A• 14; . : itli. , : ,7 w.7 . . . .,...... p 446._ 4111141111114141•1 6 '. ' • r •IL 110111 - iiii ..... . - - L ..... . . 44 f i 1,0 . _ ./1°... AO 'ft .i I-r--: i F-1 )0......._........ 4- . 11* . 1 7 , • x-- -""•7 A ,' ■- ' all rt4/3,.....4 . , .,. r• . .. A A ... - ' : 1 .3‘.. . ti• _.: , ' MOT P . ie- • 10 .,tor • , 1-........ • . .11,, , .t ■ 444: : • sr- 1- 1,- • IP it a . ,,,, . ,. ...... , • 44- ' • — ; I...c .. • '''' / t / 1 : lii •-I. 1 - . ' - . . . •- 1 _ ___ ., , 4, 111B-?lit i . • . 9,.,.. . _ p. i.... .,-.... , _ .z., „.. , ; 4" - 4 - '- ' I ' f 24 rir— - 'r I 4 • 4 .• l• 115.‘ ille PI - . 'L.'!!...••.,: -. . ?e 1 . &.. i - : . i''-'. '...i,ar-•.1 R-. ' ,— ' 6 - . .- f.- !I • .1 , .- t ..... . it._: f i t 7 1.,I • . . IIM_, diub'__- .•• - re' . _ .. . ... ._ -/Ciiiii ....r. i --, • •....,...11 .... 6 . . . - ‘ .. A . . . _ .... - +44 ....,,,,,. 1. At r --:-..i. •.. .... I 1: .•••• 0 * 3 .••- 4 I n t ., .... . , gl, , ., ti. "..'.-- . ., IV . --,. a. , , • - i "IIR . %. . . a. - ; ■ ' a , - , - . ' ' ' :- - !- :,.4 . • :7,14f . . t •, . ..ii.... . ...* , Li . ! - ____A ..4 ..• . i,, >- , - .. 0.---2 , -.. \ 4 6'...'ri. -r, . Ai • .. ., . ,. __. _ ,, \ . :,.-.--, .\?. . . . \ . .firJ. 6 , • . . • . _ . -t a .--...-• 1 ti t f - _ JA ,kdo - a -71 s,..:7 Ts'.. -4 . -*/ . il 2 3 i - r • ' L.... • , ,4„, --1-.--' . _ ie. .,... .,„ .c...x.,::, ‘e. .- ---- _IA' '.■ __. :. wir. L A .... i - '-.i ,. L % - -..-- • li -4- ;I: v.. .....:014.•••• . I"r" • t • - v. 6i. ... mit% • wor_ .... _""Av • ... ..- \lium" - 3, 11 ' .1r 11 1 . alii - •.0 + v' .0 i," , ; ... -,'....E _ow. .... ... • - ..„-., .-.- . . • • _ -.0 • ai. - AP-• ..... 4* dr - • L . 1 _ \ 4 a .., . -.-- s. • Nip 4 - , P - --,0 1 .. .-.. - -- ' r. _. ' , , t . ,-,.,....,. , :J. .L. .: C \‘ lir T. •di ••• ( * .; -' a:,'' Vs. e ; : .. •I ps; - r. .0. m; 17.- . , • e . • •'.ill:, , ".- \ , /- ID li -- # ‘ '. .. \ . igt : II t 11 • . r y $ • g _ 3•PH ie .0- 7'" . • I /' i- . .... .. .,,...; fa • li ' fl-i ... . .1 ‘ .... ri. .it • el 1 • --4..... . '. 4111111111W1101. ir Nii . II lb ib. Cr .r. 74:4;1114s - . / t . . r / - _ I- ,!. , ,...1 . -346 -.- 74 , . .. ,_. „ ...... ilb?Ili. • ' - : . 4 ' I 11 11111 pi AP - .7 . ri ' _ -i-1 1 , . ...r ...I ',. ,S--1- 7- -• -r :,-- . r ip . ire• i 7 . 1 .,- N •" ' liti," , - .4, 4 - -M* • I . i Z I on. .....".., al. ..,"' ..111 A:6111. 1• \ ..- It . -4 ■ . ' . \ .1 ..: '•,;- .. _ . - ,-.- P - • i ' - -1 ' - 0 .... I • -., -..- ' ', t'. .. fk• t ' ' " rift ' ••••■ . , .,) , ._ itt 7,,.1 ,n ._ . : .... . .... It', nob 1. _gip_ . ::-.._-- , ::'-.: -• • -:. L I ' . . -.'4.-,-; -... ■ --a •.-- ,...-.4 •• cir . tet ' , 31: 4r, . -__ . ... 4 ., - 1 ..... 26 r 7.-.. 110 .1 :r s' ..• . ... v... • .-.." . . -• ; •--- 9 - - -i. .' , . , I , , .. _____I •-rat...J ' I ' %' , * ._..._-- - .,, 0.. • II.P4iiis 'Wirt— i _ .., ih . 4 I 1, .... N.. ... ." • . . _ .. . . -1 . .. - C7 ' ' * 4 ‘ % • iftlit • , • / 4.-- _ , ti i IA S. •• V'Ill' . -, I. I . - . • --. i-,, , • il,, .. •••-•4/ • ; 1 , -. • fir...". el,: '..-' ,..: . . -r • OM * - • .1 • ' A . I • it• ' ; - V .... - • rill tir '71: 4i el/ 1 di • LOD . 44 r • ..., i, . "KV;6, ' '•'- . '' I -___. .. • . 1 fr .Jo-- If ..-..t %N. I- • 1 f - -i. ... , . r , .• i • • 0 • . ',4 - It '-; 2" • 1 i'r 71.. ,- i - -• 0 -11 'I"- -1.._.4.1'•11 1..i'-%,,-,-.-.. I-1 I.%S,i-...-i'.t t i.;•;_i--I l a‘g'l.4--'1l:i4''t''-1 1..•s: . -. _ ..•. .. _,.•v- ' 01111 1Arr- -;---;■''Ai 1,%7 • - __ •. •11.11 AV• 1.- fr .i.,Wormrwilk.74111111141e01//1/112etask:-..- - \ . NIIMINOMMENOm ■ mimimimislomiewlmmilmi mom! isz• F' P _ . _, ___ 1.■.11 , .,i . . 7111 _ .... • III: ' .reINI 1, • 111111- : i , WI • - I I it I"' . . arv".... ... , , .. II , _ _tJ 1,-..F ili , . ....) ..„. • . .J . / 1 - _ .., t - t A 1 • ...... 4 • _....,,,,. 1 4 , . , 116 , .i. • , • .. ... . ..... . . . „„ 417 t = .12. , lb. .1 ' . ""•120' 2, I -.. . • . , or- r . fit 2. 5 411 ,.. ' 'Os ." - . ;:. . i 1/ it,ip._.'•-. (,, ... • VP 1 .. II -• ... . 01 411k, % i A - - . 7. t- 0 s olt 1 - - it it a 9 i ,, 0 . -410, Air 1 hai, . ,,.. i i.."1111.111 ( 1 ‘- Iii ab 111111110011111 ....# , Ir.- Jr- rje ._Ar.......- 4 1:_ Ar.--st• -l..i .1 ,._. e, , a1I , •C• M 1-i•• :1,I --. t. _ . .,. 1,:: . .• , - .. - - ..•■ • ;di -11:-_ " P • — I -- s 1% . , „ 'k, ,,, ; il ... 1 , II 461 111•1 a.z‘` . • . .-- - •*-•,AL, ■ile - .f IP. f _ . t \ : Ir ill IrA .. 410-4.1 'I, M g — T UPlir"I . - ' • . i . is- L.,.• . .., i■ V-T- Ilik f ' •• - eV b 4 ,it i II:0 .._ 1141 •-- • a.,Sr Pr lib• 'r r , —. . — • L t-P. * "r .. , . „A.. I -, _. 4-61# -,_ L V • . 6..... 4.., -.... so . le ovi , .. . - ..-copm. ".: ' - r Vila lialliaj :r.NI ti• i . II -'' 111011617 _4 11,"1., -. --17.11116. 0/411. rag I, r 1 4111 II to • ‘ i kill! 1141714i14111 I l A a at.I . •a II 4 V ' II IlVta I kin- r ai . . . ■b sk 1 0 IIPIIIIIrt' '. Altro** t -..ail 411-_; . frl .....4• .4 1 • .. rib, —di • - N, 1414.4710/ 1 • lir j iii* 'AP 41.2. 01. I.; 1 I I It 1 1111; latV V-1 1-1 of" • r : . . i _ it...... fa: : • • --11. . ... .4...,.. w . - • rip, . 1 -....IP•••■• as.N 11/4 • 11, ... ■ ip 4. jtat ' 41041 N% vili iiiiil tip i . . 1. 11-17.' - •111111t0 .... der ill..•MNI , ...„ L bliP e I, ok 104 46 Andli. • - --' dil . • ... . ,.„.., .1. ir, .., .. .._ .1„41,- ..... it L `..- 1 7. ' ' Mal In* tk Sr .III . • . & I * 4 '9 1 IP' • ''' Wel • 11) 4440.‘1' ' fb NO - a ■ ' ---. t. . . 1 • - . il /1/11 . '4014 ,,,, . ...... .._ . . . • , , -10 "m"-- 4 1 illiTION jo. 1111.111111111.11110.0 ... 1.1.1 OM 111.1 OM MI I.I. I•I I I 0 III.. 1.1111 EMI MI MI IIIIII MI r ell ■ - i 1. - lir • i• • is*:�i ' =i ` r �_'s 1' f ille g • F� _ +• • ' . '0 rill:, ...: ._, :j1111111*- . , , 301,_. . ,.... . .,..2 _.... • 11.,..r. I ., .._ _ . . I,. _ . • . 2 dst... . . O 'Ar z r 1 Ac- :_ - -. IP "1. _ � •- LRAt I•2; i M a F l ` ; i t '' it 4110 . • r t� ' .• .. .' 7•..... .. a_ . ....' . ...• •111' '- • - • . i C s. r M. t 1 4,01 a i• • • ! i j - w,�.. ' \,-:._ 1'7. Xs 0- S, if :it 1.: .-. .-- ''' • - .4 # r . e;r�" ...Ali. •• /e` ,....Li 1. .. • .44 . - A-1t • s ". 1„.„4,0 1,. I dip r 1 •At •P' ,r . sr 14 d" '... - 1 I di' - .4,,c, .,-) :I- A'`-. 40 1110 , ' • * � -,d� • . . i i , . • 46 Je .6 e..,_ , . . I 4 .I i.. .... • , .. , .. . .,„ 1 1- .-- . _. . ••• t ..._ _2..41101,1tii . 4 . _ larikaw. • • 4r :fre, x. • 4,, . . -.01. „t Wit . .i... ' I. .. _ iiiih - 4 : . . 4. 44 iir , - . . . ,t .4, . .. ..%. it ,,,,...1,. . . r,_. . ai. '''' . . ao.i IX ob • it-". • f f " T: • .'7 f r e . 4111014., _ . ......,„&._.4....wi .17 .1. • iw.....r - - - _ ..a' .---.%1116111146s., i 1% ale MI MI MI NM =11 MI Mil MIN IMI IM • • Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon 1 APPENDIX 7.4. ' Sensitive Species Lists (taken from ONHP and NPSO databases) 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 I • 1 • I al N s 75▪ v- - N r r r Ner Nr V' N N N N Y N N N Q Q OJ 0 J J 0 0 0 J w 0 0 WJ J 0 0 I N3 LL • J N (0(0 N fpp CO JJ f0 ' ° v r 33 = o 33 I N cNi3 33 33c�i3c�i33333 comic"� `c��3333c�ic�ic�i3 J Et ✓ m o Ly°+� E o m m al C C O ° 6 m C 7 m ° m m �' W m W 07 CD 80 V ° V 8 E o $' m m c m a m E m -CD m m n mE � « 8 m E E 8 Em g Ec EE if J �<°� m 3m Emma III ! o ItIli °c`c I -a CD- —° c � m ca o ° CDM mm LY) m 1 !! ! c ° Tm �g II m EU °° .g C m .. cc alc 00e E of ca o m.� cc_:. Ea .� ma 8ES�r m a m 'g mm C O1'm C AO ° " ucOL3m Qm� mam O9m Oom E 'm7 C CW �Kc EE I W ;,�. cm .4 o > E 88 _ mm�'� a. mo W a.l g 8'eap .2 mu« m Beatwoo mm C f-gE « mmq�� @mm mcig8mVoa FFm l� 41_Z2 .-.:moicm r—° EEma EmscbC' iro& tmm y F 2 c L T m c ° c c c c 5 c m a m m-o W 8 '-Deis u�a�c ° m< § c m of c Lm E 8 ° g c m c m m.00 I - � m E w a E z �'a o m m i a E m 32 g c m`$ E g O a d o c E m— c ° m m m m .co..9 E m 2 2 �'' ci " mm . E °mmmmc °0E iscm :.02:: icy m mmDozmiP a, m'1 fl d mo nomm o oC0001 ›:! 0 ::----'_ o�En ,a ac c �BaocW macm8 8 ' ogmm� ommo B mo o c mgmmm N _jk41 LLJ=KEO' 3KmX00 -3 LL mZaJ liLLOi= oXct.cnorTi6K=LL�et3IcOimaln33 U A 'O 4 a co -. y m J co m 47 q m m a I 0 ° m a Ed) W Z P W av�aj x 2 'W A c co c m E rmi $ �T 0@@ m c c• mpp $ $ m 9m p _ nil• ° a m m m> m�F m m q `m m v m 2 o e $`m r m 3. n C$C> cs of m C. m s n UIhIIIilUIilHfl�p`t5 2 n m a c c m '^ m V a r m r E 8 @m@ m e 2 m m s m o �m o o m m a 2 m c m o m a tE 1<< 0c£34 i. -yC jpc � >'EE ' � oTom Eaa�i� 8.�na m $ eaa E J �'. Bc � mQ miC Ec W � ca� � tmE° p°pmm '=Fi � o I nwg°�30 mE@ ¢ ua '3 U3 DZm£ cno h v3Err �i .c .Sve 0 ' ' m m 8 c m m 33" 0 L 5 � E E fl = i m E 6 8 $ o x sm m > o me lilU c ' $ E .m JjiflI !lliJIIhgij; m c m'c E �q mm Q- w mamc ami m' 0.0• 8 a 28 °— n°m708 o $ZE2 ° c a = - E tE ;= ° '$ o E'2vm10E c8 ° > jolEg ;Q � E E O O 2 C m m m 7 m m m m C C C B b 12 E o 'S .4a p _ . of in 0 ppm 0 > ; ; g $ 8=a co _'7 I • Q2 `m mo @@L @m8Eea am n,t, ctc; En 8 tic 'c� a 2gEte2mm �033� _ m r CO OD CO CO m CO.-- O m C 'C t L m O g b O O T- O n O U l-S {-S S O gl O 'C O O 6 rQ QU 0.300 UUUUUO OWWWLLI,=JJJJ JM2 O O. a &loco CD co into 33 W I • • I y\ 7.\ # \§ / �7 l \ S I -J •!! kA \k 1 - - - - - - I § , _I : o t, o ! , on I R ! t \ ; ; ; e ; o e / ; • !! _ k a a — in § \\ k \ \ \ } \C } t -C • 2 ` \� � . . N {/ � ) ) ftS \ ) \ \ / ,_ & $ # 0 22 \ § \ 9 § ! i ; § % « { 44 ) ) ■ } » %m {{ § k I _ ) \ 7 § \ § ! @ § § ( § § ! § § § ( °\ I § ; & aaaa & § § , , aa � . V � C _ 7 ! ! a ! / / \ to 0 to k $ � k ^ ! 0 « / 0 k g me O ! . - ! « \ 2 , ` ° k = ! 2 ! ow me a ig k \ ) ) ) ) \ \ fl \ / \ cu I { § ) I I Im 1 ` � 8 f , | aE - = \ ! ` $ « } \ ! E r § ! % ! ; , ' r , , ; , { f EC >- 2 ! ) ` mf / ( 7 u6 - \ » ) ! ! } « , , \ k; ! ! ! ) ) k I • I Oregon Natural Heritage Information •Center-December 2004 Sensitive Data - Do Not Distribute I Scientific Name: Oncorhynehus Shawytscha pop.23 Cannon Name: Chinook salmon(Upper Willamette River ESU,spring run) Federal Status: LT CRANK G5T2Q NHP Lisa: 1 Category:Vertebrate Animal State Status: SRANK S2 HP Track Y ELCODE:AFCHA02052 I EO lD 8126 First Obs: Last Obs: 1999-PRE Confirmed: Directions:WUAMETIE RIVER County Name Ecoregion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)[ • I Lane Data currently not available. Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QtadName Watershed 4412331 Eugene East 17090003-Upper Willamette Owner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name IEO Type: REARING&MIGRATION-fish Mvunum FJev.(m): Annual Observations EO Dab: SPRING RUN;ODFW DISTRIBUTION MAPS USED TO CREATE I THE 124,000 COVERAGE. EO Comments: Protection: Management I General: DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION USED IN THIS EOR WAS DERIVED FROM ODFW GEOGRAPHIC RESOURCES DATA PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED IN 2031.UNLESS SPECIFIC DATA EXISTS IN THE DATA FIELD,THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS EOR REPRESENTS THE BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT'BY ODFWS DISTRICT FISHERIES Brill &¢T;THE PRESENCE OF CHINOOK IN DESCRIBED AREAS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED UNDOCUMENTED BUT AS HAVING A POTENTIAL OF BEING PRESENT. Scientific Name: Oregonichthys craftier' Common Name: Oregon chub Federal Status: LE CRANK G2 NHP List: 1 Category:Vertebrate Animal ' State Status: SC SRANK S2 HP Track Y ELCOOE:AFCJB56010 EO 0 16426 First Obs: 1894-07-03 Last Obs: 1894-07-03 Confirmed: Directions:WLLAMETIE RIVER NEAR EUGENE I County Name Lane )=coregipn Source Feature(Uncertainy Type(Distance)[ VW Polygon[Negligible(8 m)1 Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QtadNane Watershed 0175003W 30 - 44123A1 Eugene East 1709000301-LONG TOM RIVER I 0175003W 19 17090003 -MUDDY CREEK 017S003W 18 r 017S003W 33 • 017S003W 29 ' 0175003W 32 017S004W 13 017S004W 24 0175004W 25 I Owner Name/Type Qwner Comments Managed Area Name WILLAML I I t RIVER GREENWAY E0 Type: Minimum Elev.(m): 128 Annual Observations I. E0 Dab: 1894:UNSPECIFIED#OF FISH COLLECTED. 1983:LONG& •1894-COLLECTED BOND SAMPLED THE WILLAMETTE AT THE MILL RACE IN EUGENE DURING JUNE-SEPT 1983&FOUND NO CHUB. EO Comments: 1894 ASSO.SSP:L TRIDENTATA,C.MACROCHEILUS,P.OREGONENSIS,R.BALTEATUS. I Protection: Management: General: OSU COLLECTION#OSUT 3119. I Scientific Name: Corynorhinus townsendil Cannon Name: Townsend's big-eared bat Federal Status:SOC CRANK G4 NHP List: 2 Category:Vertebrate Animal State Status: SC SRANK S2 HP Track Y ELCOCE:AMACC0801O IE00 9833 First Obs: Last Obs: 1936-PRE Confirmed:Directions:Sensitive Data-contact ORNHIC for more information Lam County Project- Page 1 of 6 Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center-December 2004 • Sensitive Data - Do Not Distribute County Name Ecoregion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)) ' Lane WV Point[Areal-Estimated(800 m)) Town-Range Sec Note Watershed ' 017S003W 1700000307-LONG TOM RIVER I 1709000302-MUDDY CREEK Owner Name/Type Owner Commends Managed Area Name University of Oregon EO Type: Minimum Elev.(m): 130 Annual Observations I EO Data: Sensitive Data-contact ORNHIC for more information EO Comrards:CAPTURED INSIDE A CAMPUS BUILDING Protection: I Management General: Scientific Name: Chrysemys pieta I Comm Name: Painted turtle Federal Status: CRANK: G5 NHP List: 2 Category:Vertebrate Animal State Status: SC SRANK S2 HP Track: Y ELCODE:ARAAD01010 • E0 D. 15117 First Obs: 1991 Last Obs: 1991-07-03 Confined: I County Directions:Na me Ecoregion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)) Lane INV Point[Areal-Estimated(8050 m)] Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QradName Watershed 0175004W 36 44123-A1 Eugene East 1700000101-MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE RIVER,LOWER 1709000205-WILLAMETTE RIVER,COAST FORK,LOWER 1709000307-LONG TOM RIVER ' 1709000302-MUDDY CREEK 170=401-MCKENZIE RIVER,LOWER Owner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name PRIVATE ' EO Type: EO Data: 1991:1 INDMOUAL OBSERVED Minimum Elev.(m): 128 Annual Observations •1991-1 EO Comments: Protection: I Management General: Scientific Name: Emys marmorata marmorata I Common Name: Norttrwestem pond turtle Federal Status: SCE CRANK G3G4T3T4 NHP List: 2 Category:Vertebrate Animal State Status: SC SRANK: S2 HP Track Y ELCODE:ARAAD02031 aE0119 10856 First Obs: 1992-05-25 Last Obs: 1995-05-25 Confirmed: Directions: - - ------- ------ - - C o u nt y Name Ecoreaion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)) ' Lane W V Point[Areal-Estimated(50 m)] Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QradName Watershed 0175003W 28 44123-Al Eugene East - 1709003302-MUDDY CREEK IOwner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name EO Type: Minimum Elev.(m): 128 Annual Observations EO Data: 1995:2 ADULTS.1994:3 ADULTS(5'-7").1992:2 ADULTS •1995-2 ADULTS •1994-3ADULTS EO Comments:SLOUGH Protection: Management: ' General: OBSERVER:CASTILLO ' Lane County Project- Page 2 of 6 Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center-December 2004 • Sensitive Data - Do Not Distribute I Scientific Name: Emys marmorata marmorata Cannon Name: Northwestern pond turtle Federal Status: SCC GRANK G3G4T3T4 NHP List: 2 Category:Vertebrate Animal State Status: SC SRANK 52 HP Track V ELIY1r1P ARAAD02031 I EOfa 13529 First Obs: 1990.10-04 Last Obs:2001 Confirmed: Directions County Name Ecoregion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)] I Lane WV Polygon[Negligible(8 m)) Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode OtadName Watershed 0175003W 33 44123-Al Eugene East 17(9003302-MUDDY CREEK Owner Name/TVpe Owner Comments Managed Area Name COUNTY ALTON BAKER PARK EO Type: Mirimum Elev.(m): 131 Annual Observations EO Data: 2001:1 turtle.1990:1 adult turtle. I EO Comments: Protection: Management General: I Scientific Name: Condo Mauls Common Name: Sharptall snake Federal Status: GRANK G5 NHP List Category:Vertebrate Animal I State Status: SRANK S4 HP Track N El MOP ARADB09010 EO ID 23245 First Obs: Last Obs: Confined: Directions: EUGENE County Name Ecoregion Source Feature(Uncertainty Type(Distance)] I Lane WV Point[Areal-Estimated(8060 m)] Town-Range Note QuadCode Ot adName Watershed 0175004W 36 44123-Al Eugene East 1709003301-LONG TOM RIVER Owner.Narne/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name . PRIVATE EO Type: Minimum Elev.(m): 122 Annual Observations EO Data: SPECIES REPORTED IN THIS VIGNDY PER ST JOHN I EO Comments: Protection: Management General: SPECIFIC LOCALITY DATA NOT AVAILABLE Scientific Name: Erigeron decumbens var.decumbens Cannon Name: Willamette Valley daisy Federal Status: LE GRANK G4T1 NHP List: 1 Category:Vascular Plant I State Status: LE SRANK St HP Track Y El/TIT'PDAST3M133 EO ID 6745 First Obs: 1927 Last ODs: 1934-06-23 Confirmed: Y Directions: EUGENE (NENDERSON,1934 I/ (BRO N,1933),NEAR EUGENE(LEACH,1927)AND(HENDERSON,1932). CouHV Name Ecorecion Source Feature fUn certainty Tvpe(Distance)] Lane WV Point[Areal-Estimated(8050 m)] Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode OradName Watershed I 018S033W 19 43123-Hi Creswell 170900030'1-LONG TOM RIVER Owner Name/Type Owner Commends Managed Area Name I EO Type: Mlrimum Ekw.(m): 0 Annual Observations EO Data: HERBARIUM COLLECTIONS:HENDERSON,6.2334,#1648461, ORE;BROWN,8-6-33,#248,ORE;LEACH,6-27-27,NO#, WTU;HENDERSON,6-2332,#14543,UC. I EO Comments: DRY OR DRIED GROUND(HENDERSON,1934);EDGE OF MEADOW(BROWN,1933). Protection: Management: 1 Lane County Project- Page 3 of 6 I Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center-December 2004 • Sensitive Data - Do Not Distribute I General: Scientific Name: Etfgeron decumbens var.decumbens Common Name: Willamette Valley daisy Federal Status: LE CRANK G4T1 NHP List: 1 Category:Vascular Plant I State Status: LE SRANK S1 HP Track Y Ft ern:PDASTSM133 EO 7555 First Obs: 1922 Last Obs: 1922-07-05 Confirmed: Y Directions:GCSHEN. I County Name Lane Ecoregfon Source Feature(Uncertainty Type(Distance)] W V Point[Areal-Estimated(8050 m)] Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QuadName Watershed 0188003W 23 43123-H1 Creswell 1703000101-MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE RIVER,LOWER I 1709(100205-VVIL AMETTE RIVER,COAST FORK,LOWER 1709000301-LONG TOM RIVER 1709000302-MUDDY CREEK I 1709000.101-MCKENZIE RIVER,LOWER Owner Name/Type Owner Commends Managed Area Name EO Type: Mkrtnum Elev.(m): 61 Annual Observations I EO Data: HERBARIUM COLLECTION:ABRAMS,7-6x22,#8719,POM. EO Comments Protection: Management IGeneral: . Scientific Name: Clmlclfuga elate Cannon Name: Tall bugbane I Federal Status: State Status: C CRANK: G3 NHP List: 1 Category:Vascular Plant SRANK S3 HP Trade Y ELCOM:PDRAN07030 EO O 2153 First Obs: 1999-06-18 Last Obs: 1999-06-18 Confirmed: ' Directions:.11-- • --...-..__ Sr a County Name Ecorenion Source Feature(Uncertainty Type(Distance)] I Lane VU/ Point[Areal-Estimated(50 m)] Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QuadName Watershed 018S003W 04 44123-Al Eugene East 1709000302-MUDDY CREEK Owner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name I CITY CITY OF EUGENE EO Type: Minimum Elev.(m): 223 Annual Observations EO Data: 250300 PLANTS,75%IN FLOWER(50%IN FLOWER BUD), '1999-250300 PLANTS I 25%IN L.EAF.10%1ST YEAR 90%MATURE.<1 HA AREA EO Comments: PSEMEN-PCEMAC/AEMCER/POL.MUN.MANY HERBS VERY VIGOROUS ESP SMILACINA RACEMOSA,ADENCAULON BICOLOR.TREE COVER:GAP BELOW,80°4 ABOVE,SHRUB 60%,HERB 100%.ASPECT:84 DEG AZ,SLOPE: 20-45%.MID SLOPE,OPEN/FILTERED LIGHT,MOIST.ASSCC SPECIES:SHRUBS:SAMBUCUS CALUCARPA,RUBUS I DISCOLOR,CORYLUS CORNUTA VAR CAL,ADENOCAULON BICOLOR,SMILACINA RACEMOSA,DRYOPTERIS SP, HEDERA HELIX,OSMORHIZA CHILENSIS,GERANIUM ROBERTAWUM,ACTAEA RUBRP5 RUBUS URSINUS, PRCSARTES HOOKERII. Protection: THREATS BY HEDERA HELLS,RUBUS DISCOLOR,GERANIUM ROBERTIANUM. I Management General: 1999 PLANT SIGHTING REPORT,BRUCE NEW-LOUSE REPORTER. Scientific Name: C/mlcifuga Nara Common Name: Tall bugbane I Federal Status: CRANK G3 NHP List 1 Category:Vascular Plant State Status: C SRANK S3 HP Track Y FI fl YIF-PDRAN07030 ECU 21448 First Obs: 1991 Last Obs: 1991-06-16 Confirmed: I Directions: h q IPS ILane County Project- Page 4 of 6 I Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center-December 2004 Sensitive Data - Do Not Distribute County Name Ecorenion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)) Lane VV1/ Polygon[Areal-Delimited(8 m)] Polygon[Areal-Delimited(8 m)J I Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QuadName Watershed 01135003W 03 44123-Al Eugene East 1709000302-MUDDY CREEK Owner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name PRIVATE I EO Type: Minmum Elev.(m): 140 Annual Observations EO Dam PL : 28 ANTS IN 4 PATCHES;EACH PATCH APPROX Dr2O •1991-28 PLANTS METERS. I EO Commends: EDGE OF PSME-PCMA FOREST Wf111 SHRUBS AND HERBACEOUS PERENNIALS,VERY FEW WEEDS.LOWER SLOPE POSITION,ALTERED,MOIST.SEDIMENTARY ROCK ASSrr SPECIES:PSME,ACMA,RUBUS,PARVIFLORA, SYMPHORICARPOS ALBA,RHUS DIVERSILOBA. Protection: Management. General: ODA SIGHTING REPORT 1991;KAYE,TOM. Scientific Name: Horkelia congests sap.congesta Carman Name: Shaggy horkella I Federal Status:SOC GRANK (3412 NHP List: 1 Category: Vascular Plain State Status: C SRANK S2 HP Track Y ELCODE:PDROSWo031 EO ID. 10321 First Obs: Last Obs: Confirmed: I County Directions:Name SPENCER BUTTE[NO TRS GIVEN] Ecoregion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distancel) Lane WI Point[Areal-Estimated(8050 m)J Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QuadName Watershed I 0183033W 19 43123-H1 Creswell 1709000205-WILLAMETTE RIVER,COAST FORK,LOWER 1703000301-LONG TOM RIVER Owner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name ' EO Type: Minimum Elev.(m): Annual Observations EO Dab: EO Commis: I Protection: Management: General: KECK D.1938.REVISION OF HORKEUA AND IVESIA.LLOYDIA 1(1-4):75-1W.HERBARIUM COLLECTION: ANDREWS 179(ORE) Scientific Name: Horkelia congests asp.congests Common Name: Shaggy horkelia Federal Status: SOC CRANK 6412 NHP List: 1 Category:Vascular Plant I State Status: C SRANK: S2 HP Track Y ELCOOE:POROSO✓031 EO IQ 18729 First Obs: Last Obs: Confirmed: Directions: GOSKEN JNOTRS GIVEN] County Name Eceregion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type(Distance)) 1 Lane WV Point[Areal-Estimated(8050 m)) Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QuadName Watershed 018S003W 23 43123-H1 Creswell 1709000205-WILLAMETTE RIVER,COAST FORK,LOWER 1 Owner Name/Type Owner Comments Managed Area Name EO Type: Minimum Elev.(m): Annual Observations I EO Data: EO Comments: Protection: Management: 1 General: KECK D.1938.REVISION OF HORKEUA AND[VESIA LLOYDV 1(1-4):75109.HERBARIUM COLLECTION:ABRAMS 8724(PO,SU) ' Lane County Project- Page 5 of 6 I 1• Oregon Natural Heritage Information• Center-December 2004 • Sensitive Data - Do Not Distribute ' Scientific Name: Carex retrorsa Common Name: Retrorse sedge Federal Status: CRANK G5 NHP List 2 Category:Vascular Plant State Status: SRANK S1 HP Track Y Fl nOciE.PMCYP038J0 ' • EC)lQ 10778 First Obs: 1992-05-21 Last Obs: 1992-06-03 Confirmed: Directions: EUGENE)-. 1 Couriv Name km22ion Source Feature[Uncertainty Type{Distance)( lane IAN Point[Areal-Estimated(400 m)1 ' Town-Range Sec Note QuadCode QtadName Watershed 0175003W 28 44123-Al Eugene East 1709000302-MUDDY CREEK Owner Nameutvae Owner Comments Managed Area Name - EO Type:• MYirrslm Elev.(m): 130 Annual Observations EO Data: [NO EODATA GIVEN' EO Comments:WET AREAS.1)SMALL WET AREA,WITH ELEOCHARIS,LYSIMACHIA NUMMULARIA,SCIRPUS,TYPHA.2) CESPITO5E;MARGIN OF.POOL,WITH CAREX STIPATA. 1 Protection: Management General: HERBARIUM COLLECTIONS.1992 CAREX WORKING GROUP DATABASE.WAGNER cLY I FC7)Ot{ msolee • ND ZIKACOLLE 14 records total • • • • I I 1 I 1 1 Lane County Project- Page 6 of 6 • 1 • 1 Key to Oregon Natural Heritage formation Center Data • ' Field Name Description Scientific Name The scientific name of the species. ICommon Name The common name of the species. Category Value that indicates the broad biological category for each species. I ELCODE Unique Heritage Program code for identifying this element 1st and 2nd byte(PD=Plant dirt, PM=Plant monocot, PG=Plant gymnosperm,PP=Plant pteridophyte,AA=amphibian,AB=bird,AF=fish,AM=mammal, AR=reptile,1=invertebrate. 3rd-5th byte(family abbreviation). 6th-7th(genus code).8th31h(species). 10th (tie breaker). I Federal Status US Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service status. LE=listed endangered,LT=listed threatened, PE or PT=proposed endangered or threatened,C=candidate for listing with enough information available for listing, SOC=spades of concern,-PD=proposed delisting,-NL=not listed(in part of the range). I State Status For animals, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife status; LE=listed endangered,PE=proposed endangered, PT=proposed threatened,SC or C=sensitivecritical,SV or V=sensitive-vulnerable,SP or P=sensitive-peripheral,SU or U=sensitive-undetermined status. For plants, Oregon Department of I Agriculture status; LE=listed endangered,LT=listed threatened,C=candidate. GRANK/SRANK ORNHIC participates in an international system for ranking rare,threatened and endangered species throughout the world. The system was developed by The Nature Conservancy and is now maintained by Nature Serve in cooperation with Heritage Programs or Conservation Data Centers(CDCs)in all 50 states, I in 4 Canadian provinces,and in 13 Latin American countries. The ranking is a 1-5 scale,primarily based on the number of known occurrences,but also including threats,sensitivity,area occupied,and other biological factors. In this book the ranks occupy two lines. The top line is the Global Rank and begins with a"G". If the taxon has a trinomial(a subspecies,variety or recognized race),this is followed by a"T"rank indicator. I A'Q"at the end of this line indicates the taxon has taxonomic questions. The second line is the State Rank and begins with the letter"S". The ranks are summarized as follows: 1 =Critically imperiled because of extreme rarity or because it is somehow especially winerable to extinction or extirpation,typically with 5 or fewer occurrences;2=Imperiled because of rarity or because other factors demonstrably make it very I vulnerable to extinction(extirpation),typically with 6-20 occurrences; 3=Rare,uncommon or threatened, but not immediately imperiled,typically with 21-100 occurrences;4=Not rare and apparently secure,but with cause for long-term concern,usually with more than 100 occurrences;5=Demonstrably widespread, abundant,and secure;H =Historical Occurrence,formerly part of the native biota with the implied I expectation that it may be rediscovered;X=Presumed extirpated or extinct; U=Unknown rank; ?=Not yet ranked,or assigned rank is uncertain. NHP list All rare species in Oregon are assigned a list number of 1,2, 3 or 4,where 1=threatened or endangered I throughout range, 2=threatened or endangered in Oregon but more common elsewhere,3=Review List (more information is needed),4=Watch List(currently stable). A null value indicates the species is not currently on our rare species list. HP Track We currently obtain and computerize locational information for only those elements marked with Y(es). I Those species marked with N(o)or W(atch)have incomplete data because we do not actively track them at this time. EO ID Unique identifier for the Element Occurrence(EO). IFirst obs First reported sighting date for this occurrence in the form YYYY-MM-DD. Last_obs Last reported sighting date,usually in the form YYYY-MM-DD. IConfirmed Indication of whether taxonomic identification of the Element represented by this occurrence has been confirmed by a reliable individual. Blank=unknown,assumed to be correctly identified.Y=Yes,confident identification. ?=identification questions. _ IDirections Site name and/or directions to site. County County name(s)in which EO is mapped. . IEcoregion Physiographic Province in which EO is mapped:CR=Coast Range,WV=Willamette Valley, KM=Klamath Mountains,WC=West slope and crest of the Cascades,EC=East slope of the Cascades, BM=Ochoco, Blue and Wallowa Mts.,BR=Basin and Range,CB=Columbia Basin,SP=Snake River Plains. I IKey to Oregon Natural Heritage nformation Center Data • Field Name Description Source Feature A Source Feature is the initial translation of a discrete unit of observation data as a spatial feature. Creation of a Source Feature requires an interpretive process.The likely location and extent of an I observation is determined through consideration of the amount and direction of any variability between the recorded and actual locations of the observation data.In most cases,the Source Feature is delineated to encompass locational uncertainty. I A Source Feature can be a point,line,or polygon. The type of Source Feature developed depends on both the preceding conceptual feature type and the locational uncertainty associated with the feature. • Uncertainty Type The recorded location of an observation of an Element may vary from its true location due to many factors, (Distance) including the level of expertise of the data collector,differences in survey techniques and equipment used, ' and the amount and type of information obtained. This inaccuracy is characterized as locational uncertainty, and is assessed for Source Feature(s)based on the uncertainty associated with the underlying information on the location of the observation. Four categories of locational uncertainty have been identified,as follows: Negligible uncertainty is less than or equal to 6.25 meters in any dimension. Source Features with negligible uncertainty are based on a comprehensive field survey with high quality mapping and a high degree of certainty. I Linear uncertainty is greater than 6.25 meters,and varies along an axis(e.g.,a path,stream,ridgeline).The true location of an observation with linear uncertainty may be visualized as effectively sliding along a line that delineates the uncertainty. Areal delimited uncertainty is greater than 6.25 meters,and varies in more than one dimension.The true I location of an observation can be visualized as floating within an area with a boundary that can be specifically delimited. Boundaries can be defined using roads, bodies of water,etc. Areal estimated uncertainty is greater than 6.25 meters,and varies in more than one dimension. A I boundary cannot be specifically delimited based on the observation information,i.e.,the actual extent is unknown.The true location of the observation can be visualized as floating within an area for which boundaries cannot be specifically delimited.Source Features with areal estimated uncertainty require that the user specify an estimated uncertainty distance to be used for buffering the feature to incorporate the locational uncertainty. I Town-Range,Sec,and United States rectangular land survey(also known as the Public Land Survey System)legal township, Note range,and section descriptions that best define the location of the Element Occurrence. Township first(4 bytes), range second(4 bytes). For example: 0045029E=Township 4S, Range 29E. All locations are ' with reference to the Willamette Meridian. Fractional ranges or townships are indicated in the Note field. Quadcode USGS code for the USGS topographic quadrangle map(s)where the record is mapped. Quadname Name of the USGS topographic quadrangle map(s)where the record is mapped. Watershed Watershed(s), identified according to the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS)Hydrologic Unit Map 10-digit code,within which the Element Occurrence is located. I Owner Name/Type and Federal,State, Private,etc. Comments • I Managed Area Name BLM District, USFS Forest, Private Preserve EO Type For animals,type of occurrence,eg.roost,nest,spawning,etc. • EO Data Species and population biology-numbers,age,nesting success,vigor,phonology,disease,pollinators,etc. ' EO Comments Habitat information,e.g.aspect,slope,soils,associated species,community type,etc. I Minimum Elevation Minimum elevation of the area covered by the range of the taxon,in meters.-339 or blank=not determined. Annual Observation Summary of yearly observation. Protection Comments on protectibility and threats. Management Comments on how the site is managed. • General Miscellaneous comments. . 1 • • Site Inventory Report of Findings Phil Marvin/Glenwood Property Project Springfield,Oregon 1 APPENDIX 7.5. Statement Of Qualifications 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. December 2004 t l: , T • S COYOTE CREEK MICHAEL W.SHIPPEY,MLA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. PRINCIPAL/LANDSCAPE ECOLOGIST Education Master of Landscape Arch.,Landscape Ecology focus,Univ. of Oregon, 1991 Bachelor of Landscape Architecture,University of Oregon, 1989 Bachelor of Fine Arts(Visual Arts),Bio. Sciences minor,Or. State Univ., 1976 Professional Society of Wetland Scientists, Member since 1993 Affiliations Society for Ecological Restoration, Member since 1989 ' . Professional 2002—present,Principal/Landscape Ecologist, Coyote Creek Environmental Services, Inc. Experience 1998-2002, Associate/Natural Resources Manager, Satre Associates,P.C. 1991-1998, Wetland Resource Specialist,Oregon Department of Transportation 1989-1991,Wetland Field Researcher, Scientific Resources Inc. Supplemental June 2004,Presenting Data and Information,Training,Edward Tulle Coursework Feb. 2003,Native Plant Restoration in the Willamette Valley Workshop, OSU Feb. 2003,NW Stream Restoration Design Symposium,NW River Restoration Org. Jan. 2002,Mitigation Planting Workshop,Oregon Division of State Lands Nov. 2001, Watershed Restoration Workshop, American Fisheries Society April 2001,Mitigation Goals,Objectives and Success Criteria Workshop,O.D.S.L. March 2001,HydroGeoMorphic Assessment Methodology Workshop,O.D.S.L. May 2000,ESA and Biological Assessments Workshop, Society of Wetland Scientists Feb. 1999, Stormwater Solutions,Implementation of NPSP Control,City of Medford May 1997,Designing and Implementing Habitat Modifications for Salmon and Trout,O.D.O.T. May 1997,Integrating Stormwater Management&Wetlands, Society of Wetland Scientists 1 Feb. 1997,The Hydrogeomorphic Functional Assessment Method, CTE Teleconference July 1996,Hydric Soil Geomorphology and Identification Course,OSU July 1994, Grasses, Sedges and Rushes Course,Hortus Northwest June 1994, Streambank Protection using Vegetation Workshop,Wash.Dept. of Ecology ' Feb. 1993, Stream Habitat Restoration: App. of Geomorphic Principles,OSU Oct. 1992, Wetland Delineation Course, 1987 Manual, Wetland Training Institute July 1992, Wetland Plant Identification Course, Salix Associates April 1992, Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment,Unified Sewerage Agency Through the combination of interests,education and experience,Mike has developed a strong reputation for solid ' natural resource research,innovative environmental design solutions, thorough construction inspection and insightful post- construction monitoring. He has demonstrated the ability to deliver complex projects within the estimated timeframe,and has developed strong working relationships with a wide variety of regulatory and resource agency staff members. Additionally, Mike also provides'an enthusiastic and creative approach to problem-solving,based upon knowledge of the regulations and ' regulatory processes, integrated with the needs of the client and responsible stewardship of the resource. Mike consistently and successfully receives both State and Federal concurrence for his delineation projects. Mike's ' compensatory mitigation designs have often integrated wetland needs with other resource needs, such as threatened and endangered plant population conservation zones and fish habitat mitigation. Mike has participated in many major projects of local and statewide importance,such as providing delineation services for over 600 acres in the West Eugene area;providing delineation,rare plant survey and permitting services for expansion of the second largest airport in the state;providing ' delineation and compensatory design services for widening of 15 miles of Interstate 5 for the Oregon Department of 'Transportation; providing compensatory design services for realignment of 7 miles of State Highway 20,which integrated coastal salmon habitat needs with wetland mitigation requirements;and providing compensatory design and construction monitoring services for a 46 acre wetland mitigation bank site. In addition,Mike has co-authored the Guide to Wetland Issues for Transportation Designers for the American ' Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. This publication was issued in September 1996 and has been distributed nationally,receiving very strong praise from a varied audience. Mike is currently working on a private wetland mitigation bank at his 47 acre farm in the Coyote Creek basin southwest of Eugene and has recently celebrated 2 years of his own business enterprise,Coyote Creek Environmental Services,Inc. I 1 0 • Wetland Determinations,Delineations and Documentation of Findings Mike has received formal training in all aspects of wetland delineation, including intensive delineation training utilizing the 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual;wetland plant identification and hydric soil geomorphology(please see resume I for additional professional coursework.) In his 10+years conducting and providing consulting oversight for wetland delineations,Mike has successfully received both State and Federal concurrence for all of his delineation projects. • Each of the projects listed below required a complete technical report(Wetland Determination, Wetland Delineation), ' either for inclusion within required National Environmental Policy Act documents(Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements),or as supporting documents for various regulatory permit applications. The following list is a sample of the many projects Mike has personally delineated or supervised: IProject Name County . Study Area(Acres? 1135 Amazon Floodplain Restoration Lane 170 I Amazon Creek(2 parcels) Lane 5 Bear Creek Restoration Columbia 2 Canary Road Lane 1 mile Coburg Local Wetland Inventory Lane 770 I Coyote Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank Lane 47 Diamond Ridge Subdivision Lane 260 Dragonfly Bend Habitat Enhancement Proj. Lane 7 I Eugene Airport Expansion Lane 335 Fern Ridge Bikepath(3 parcels) Lane 15 Gilham Parent Council Lane 5 Greenhill Road @ Barger Drive Lane . 7 I Halsey-Lane Co. Line Linn 12.5 miles Hwy 238-Jackson Street Jackson 10 miles Legacy Estates Subdivision Lane 18 Lorane Highway Bridge Replacement Lane 1.0 MP 7/Florence—Eugene Highway - Lane 1 . North Jefferson-North Albany Linn 5 miles I Oaklea Developments,Inc. Lane 264• Oregon Coast Highway @ 131st Lincoln 2 Parsons Creek Substation(EPUD) Lane 10 Peacefealth Riverbend Hospital Lane 55 I Pleasant Valley-Greentimber Tillamook I mile Royal Avenue TGM Project Lane 220 Silverton Rd-State St Marion 5 miles I Siuslaw River Road Bridge Lane 5 Spencer Creek Bridge Lincoln 10 Springfield Quarry Lane 10 I . Stone Forest Industries Lane 55 Tangent Local Wetland Inventory Lane 2200 W i lth-Garfield(Phase 1) Lane 1.5 miles W 11th-NCL(Phase 1)(Eugene Beltline Lane 47 IMitigation Site) IWetland and Stream Restoration Design and Project Permitting With his background in Landscape Architecture and Biology,Mike brings to a mitigation design project a depth of understanding of landscape processes and habitat specifics. Mike has developed a strong reputation as an environmental 1 designer, integrating multiple needs and constraints to optimize the functioning of mitigation designs. Additionally,Mike has extensive experience in developing Joint Permit Applications for removal/fill projects,and has established a good working relationship with many of his regulatory and review agency peers. I . The following is a sample list of mitigation design projects Mike has successfully conducted,many of which also • required permits. I • . I 0 • Project County Site Size(acres) I Amazon Creek Widening Project Lane 10 Bear Creek Channel Restoration Columbia 0.25 Bob Artz Park Lane 1 I Chrome Plant-Cedar Pt Coos 25+ Cox Cr. and W.Cox Cr.Br. Linn 4 Coyote Creek Mitigation Bank Lane 38 Diamond Ridge Subdivision Lane 25 I Dragonfly Bend Habitat Enhancement Proj. Lane 7 E. Courtney Cr. Bridge Linn 2 Eddyville-Cline Hill Lincoln 8 I Eugene Airport Expansion Lane 90 Greensprings-Midland Klamath 18 Greenwood Dr-Vida Lane 18 I Linn Co.-McKenzie River Lane 0.5 Martinsen Mitigation Bank Lane 46 Noti-Veneta Lane 5 Oaklea Dr.-Jct 58 Lane 0.5 I Olalla Cr-Hoover Hill Rd Douglas 8+ Or. Coast Hwy @ Sandlake Rd Tillamook 1 Pleasant Valley-Greentimber Tillamook 2 I Salt Cr Falls-Klamath Co Lane 15 Shadowridge Subdivision Lane 4 Silverton Rd-State St Marion 6 Siskiyou Rest Area Jackson 12 I Spoon Cr. Bridge Linn 3 SPTC-Silverton Rd Marion 4 St.Vincent de Paul Lane I I State St-N. Santiam Hwy Marion 6 Walnut Blvd Extension Benton 6 Wlith-NCL Lane 47 II Construction Inspection I Mike has been in the unique position of providing environmental advice on many major construction projects. This has allowed him to follow projects for which he conducted the delineation and mitigation planning,and ensure that the mitigation sites were developed according to the letter and intent of permit conditions. IThe following is a sample list of projects for which Mike provided construction monitoring and insµztion. I Project Name Coun Study Area(acres) Amazon Creek Enhancement/City of Eugene Lane 2.0 Ash Meadows/St.Vincent de Paul Lane 1.5 Bear Creek Channel Restoration/City of Vernonia Columbia 0.25 I Bob Artz Park/Willamalane Parks&Rec. Lane I Cox Cr. and W. Cox Cr. Br./ODOT Linn 4 E. Courtney Cr.Bridge/OFOT Linn 2 I Greensprings—Midland/ODOT Klamath 18 12.5 Halsey-Lane Co.Line/ODOT Linn miles Joseph St.-Stayton City Limits/ODOT Marion 18 Legacy Estates/David Corey Lane 18 I Linn Co.-McKenzie River/ODOT Lane 0.5 Martinson Mitigation Bank Lane 46 Noti—Veneta/ODOT Lane 5 1 Olalla Cr-Hoover Hill Rd/ODOT Douglas 8+ Or. Coast Hwy @ Sandlake Rd/ODOT Tillamook 1 Parsons Creek Fish Screen/EPUD Lane 0.25 1 Paninaula Do.sA rulvart/T.ono Vmint.,DPW T ant. A 15 • Pleasant Valley—G�timber/ODOT Tillam• 2 Salt Cr Falls-Klamath Co/ODOT Lane 15 I Shadowridge Subdivision Lane 4 Silverton Rd-State St/ODOT Marion 6 Spoon Cr. Bridge/ODOT Linn 3 SPTC-Silverton Rd/ODOT Marion 4 Woahink Creek Culvert/Lane County DPW Lane 0.25 I . Post-construction Monitoring Mike has conducted post-construction monitoring for many of the previously-listed projects and others. This has I involved designing the appropriate monitoring strategies which would measure the characteristics of each particular mitigation site and inform the detennination of success,as specified in the state and federal permits. Mike is familiar with a variety of monitoring protocols,has participated in interagency working groups focused on the issue of mitigation success,and has made ' presentations on Wetland Mitigation Design and Success Criteria. Habitat Characterization and Sequential Rare Plant Surveys IBased upon Mike's education in Landscape Architecture,Landscape Ecology and Biology, supplemented with training in various landscape assessment methodologies,Mike is fully able to characterize and assess functions and values of a wide I variety of habitat types. These include wetland areas, riparian areas, upland areas and disturbed/agricultural/urbanizing areas. Mike has received formal training in the identification of a wide range of native plants. The following list is a sample of projects for which Mike has performed Habitat Characterization and/or Sequential I Rare Plant Surveys: Project Name County Study Area(acres) Dates I 1135 Amazon FloodPlain Project Lane 75 2000 3'd—4th Avenue Connector Lane 10 2003 A-1 Channel Realignment Lane 10 2004 I Airport Road Realignment Lane 25 2004 Candlelight Park Project Lane 15 2004 Coyote Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank Lane 47 1999 Dragonfly Bend Project Lane 70 2003 I Eugene Airport Expansion Lane 350 1999-2002 Fern Ridge Bikepath(3 parcels) Lane 15 1999-2000 Greenhill Channel Relocation Lane 10 2003 I Laurel Hill Reservoirs Project Lane 8 2002 PeaceHealth/Riverbend Project Lane 160 2002 Pioneer Parkway Expansion Lane 10 2002 -2003 ' Royal Avenue TGM Nodal Project Lane 220 2000 Fish-Culvert Replacement Monitoring IBased upon Mike's education and supplemental training regarding fish passage and salmonid life cycle requirements, Mike has conducted construction monitoring on several culvert replacement projects. This work typically involves on-site I inspection of the work in progress,paying particular attention to issues of erosion control,sedimentation stabilization, isolation of instream work areas,measures to ensure protection of sensitive and endangered fish species. The following table displays a list of these projects. I Project Name County Dates Clear Lake Road Project Lane 2001 Hills Creek Road Project Lane 2001 ' Peninsula Road Project Lane 2001