Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 9/3/2013 Development Services apartment 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 PERMIT REVIEW INTAKE FORM (City Staff completes form) Permit Type .., ; Dept of Motor Vehicles-New: ❑ Land Use Compatibility Statement: X City: ❑ Dept of Motor Vehicles-Renewal: ❑ Zoning Verification Letter: ❑ UGB: ❑ Project Information A. •licant Name: Deanna Merriman Phone: 800-344-2944 e.3283 Com •an : The Plannin• & Zonin• Resource Corsoration Cell: Address: 100 NE 5th Street, Oklahoma Cit , OK 73104 Pro•er Owner: Gatewa Mall Partners Phone: Com •an : Gatewa Mall Partners Cell: Address: 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032200 TAX LOT NO S : 2300 Pro•ert a • • - • On n - - - Street Description of Proposal: Zoning Verification Letter including related documents, and building information. 'Record_Information° f Record No: P P-- f3 n6 5 Date Received:9/3/13 A• • lication Fee: $281 Technical Fee: $14.05 TOTAL FEES: $295.05 Assi• ned Planner:L. Miller Date Received: SEP - 3 2013 Original Submittal Revised 11 2 11 kl • The Planning & Zoning Resource Corporation PZR° 100 NE 5th Street • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104 Telephone (405) 840-4344 Fax (405) 840-2608 REPORT Toll Free (800) 344-2944 • Toll Free Fax Available on Request Please fax to my direct fax number 405-562-9208 To: Planner on Duty Fax: Email: Date: 08/28/2013 Subject: Zoning Verification Letter and Related Documents Ref. Number: 70134-5 RE: Gateway Mall, 3000 Gateway Street, Springfield, Oregon Add'I Info: SEE ATTACHED SURVEY COPY FOR YOUR REFERENCE. • Attached is our request for property information on the above-mentioned property. Please copy it onto your letterhead, provide the requested information, sign and return to me via either my direct fax, shown above, or via email to Deana.Merriman @pzr.com. It is my understanding that there will be fees associated with this request. Please be advised that the total fees are not to exceed $295.00 without my approval. If you should expect the fees to exceed this amount, please notify me as soon as possible. Furthermore, any additional costs associated with this request must be approved, in writing, prior to their incurrence. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration on the above matter. If there are any questions you are unable to answer please let me know who I should contact. If you have any questions or concerns, do hot hesitate to contact me at the toll free number 800-344-2944, extension 3283. You may also reach me by email at: Deana.Merriman @pzr.com. Sincerely, Deana Merriman ,t ate-Received. SEP - 3 2013 Original Submittal Date Received: t Planner: LM f ls- • • (PLEASE COPY ONTO YOUR LETTERHEAD) • The Planning&Zoning Resource Corporation 100 NE 5th Street Oklahoma City,OK 73104 08/28/2013 ATTN: Deana Merriman Ref. No. 70134-5 RE: Gateway Mall, 3000 Gateway Street, Springfield, Oregon Add'Info. SEE ATTACHED SURVEY COPY FOR YOUR REFERENCE. The current zoning classification for the subject property is: Adjacent property zoning designations: North: South: East: West: Is the subject property part of a Planned Unit Development? Yes, part of a PUD(See comment) No, not part of a PUD Comment: Is the subject property part of an Overlay District? Yes,within an Overlay District No, not within an Overlay District Comment: The subject property is currently regulated by: Section of the Zoning Ordinance Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. (copy attached) Site Plan Approval Case No. (copy of plan and case attached) Comment: According to the zoning ordinances and regulations for this district,the use of the subject property is a: Permitted Use by Right Permitted Use by Special/Specific Use Permit Copy Attached Copy Not Available(see comment) Legal Non-Conforming Use(no longer permitted by right due to amendments, re-zoning,variance granted or — other changes. See comments) Non-Permitted Use Comment: The subject structure(s)was developed: In accordance with Current Zoning Code Requirements and is Legal Conforming Non-Conforming(see comments) In accordance with Previous Zoning Code Requirements(amendments, rezoning,variance granted)and is - Legal Non-Conforming to current zoning requirements Prior to the adoption of the Zoning Code and is Grandfathered/Legal Non-conforming to current zoning requirements. In accordance with Approved Site Plan and is Legal Conforming to approved site plan. If any nonconforming — issues exist with respect to current zoning requirement;the subject property would be considered legal non-conforming. Comment: Information regarding variances,special permits/exceptions,ordinances or conditions: There do not appear to be any variances, special permits/exceptions,ordinances or conditions that apply to the — subject property. The following apply to the subject property(see comments): Variance-Documentation attached or is otherwise, no longer available(see comment) Special Permit/Exception Documentation attached or is otherwise, no longer available(see comment) Ordinance Documentation attached or is otherwise, no longer available(see comment) Conditions Documentation attached or is otherwise, no longer available(see comment) Comment: Rebuild: In the event of casualty,in whole or in part,the structure located on the subject property: May be rebuilt in the current form(i.e. no loss of square footage, same footprint,with drive through(s), if — applicable. May not be rebuilt in its current form,except upon satisfaction of certain conditions, limitations,or requirements. — Please see section of the current zoning code/ordinance for details. Comment: To the best of your knowledge,do your records show any unresolved zoning code violations? ElYes, there are open violations on file in our records. (See attached list and/or copies/cases) ❑ No, there are no open violations on file in our records. Please note,this request is for open violations of which you are aware. PZR is not requesting an inspection be made. To the best of your knowledge,do your records show any unresolved building code violations and/or complaints? I I Yes,there are open violations on file in our records. (See attached list and/or copies/cases) No,there are no open violations on file in our records. `Please note,this request is for open violations of which you are aware. PZR is not requesting an inspection be made. Site Plan Information: The subject property was not subject to a site plan approval process. The subject property was subject to site plan approval: a copy of the approved site plan is attached. The subject property was subject to site plan approval, but a copy of the approved site plan is no longer in existence(was lost or destroyed).All other existing documents applicable to site plan approval for the site are attached if availalbe. An approved site plan for the subject property is on file, but our office does not have the necessary resources to reproduce and distribute copies of the plan.All other existing documents applicable to site plan approval are attached if availalbe. Other, (as noted here): Were Certificates of Occupancy issued? If so,please provide all available copies.If copies are unavailable, please fill out our attached form letter. Please call the undersigned at , extension if you have questions or concerns. Sincerely: Name: Department: Title: Email: • • • (PLEASE COPY ONTO YOUR LETTERHEAD) 8/28/2013 Ref. No. 70134-5 • RE: Gateway Mall, 3000 Gateway Street, Springfield, Oregon Add'I Info: SEE ATTACHED SURVEY COPY FOR YOUR REFERENCE. Based on our records[choose one]: A valid final certificate of occupancy has been issued and is in effect for the Project. To the best of our knowledge,all required Certificates of Occupancy have been issued.The absence of a certificate of occupancy for the Project is not a violation and will not give rise to any enforcement action affecting the Project. (See Attached Copy Issued) nCertificates of Occupancy are not required. Final Building Permits have been issued and are now outstanding for the Project. (See Attached Copy Issued) nCertificates of Occupancy for projects constructed prior to the year are no longer on file with this office. The Project was constructed in . The absence of a certificate of occupancy for the Project is not a violation and will not give rise to any enforcement action affecting the Project. To the best of our knowledge,all required Certificates of Occupancy have been issued.A certificate of occupancy for the Project will only be required to the extent of any construction activity(such as restoring, renovating or expanding the Project or any part thereof). nWe are unable to locate a certificate of occupancy for the Project from our records. We have evidence in our records, however, one was issued and has been subsequently lost or misplaced. The absence of a certificate of occupancy for the Project is not a violation and will not give rise to any enforcement action affecting the Project. To the best of our knowledge,all required Certificates of Occupancy have been issued.A certificate of occupancy for the Project will only be required to the extent of any construction activity, restoring, renovating or expanding the Project or any part thereof nThis site is still being constructed. The absence of a certificate of occupancy for the Project will not give rise to any enforcement action affecting the Project. A certificate of occupancy for the Project will be issued when all final inspections have been passed. Please call the undersigned at ,extension if you have questions or concerns. Sincerely: Name: Title: